Chronic Rejection After Intestinal Transplant: Where Are We in Order to Avert It?

[Current State of Intestinal Transplantation]

According to the current practice guidelines of the German Medical Chamber, intestinal transplantation is the only causal option for complicated chronic intestinal failure. However, due to demanding immunological, perioperative, infectious challenges, intestinal transplantation is a complementary treatment option secondary to intestinal rehabilitation, after overt failure of parenteral supplementation. This review contains a selected summary of international literature and guidelines, as well as the transplant practice guidelines of the German Medical Chamber. The field of intestinal transplantation comprises a variety of single and combined transplant procedures which are tailored to individual patients and their comorbidities secondary to complicated chronic intestinal failure. The indication is typically preceded by intense intestinal rehabilitation. Nowadays, around 100-150 intestinal transplants are performed worldwide, resulting in 1- and 3- year survival rates of almost 80 and 70%, respectively. This makes intestinal transplantation the rarest of all vascularised organ transplants which is typically only indicated after all modern measures of intestinal rehabilitation have been exploited.

Intestinal transplantation: Significance of immune responses

Intestinal allografts, with many resident immune cells and as a destination for circulating lymphocytes of the recipient, appear to be the most challenging solid organ transplants. The high incidence of acute rejection and frequent reports of fatal graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after intestinal transplantation call for more research to describe the molecular mechanisms involved in the immunopathogenesis of post-transplant complications to define new therapeutic targets. In addition, according to the rapid development of immunosuppressive agents, it is time to consider novel therapeutic approaches in managing treatment-refractory patients with rejection or severe GvHD. Herein, the main immunological challenges before and after intestinal transplant including, brain-dead donor inflammation, acute rejection, antibody-mediated, and chronic rejections, as well as GvHD have been described. Besides, the new immune-based therapies used in experimental and clinical settings to improve tolerance toward intestinal allograft, and cases of operational tolerance have been reviewed.

Immune reactions following intestinal transplantation: Mechanisms and prevention

For patients with intestinal failure, small bowel transplantation remains one of the most effective treatments despite continuous advancements in parenteral nutrition techniques. Long-term use of parenteral nutrition can result in serious complications that lead to metabolic dysfunction and organ failure. However, the small intestine is a highly immunogenic organ with a large amount of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue and histocompatibility antigens; therefore, the small intestine is highly susceptible to severe immune rejection. This article discusses the mechanisms underlying immune rejection after small bowel transplantation and presents various options for prevention and treatment. Our findings offer new insights into the development of small bowel transplantation.

Immune cell profiling in intestinal transplantation

Since the first published case study of human intestinal transplantation in 1967, there have been significant studies of intestinal transplant immunology in both animal models and humans. An improved understanding of the profiles of different immune cell subsets is critical for understanding their contributions to graft outcomes. While different studies have focused on the contribution of one or a few subsets to intestinal transplant, no study has integrated these data for a comprehensive overview of immune dynamics after intestinal transplant. Here, we provide a systematic review of the literature on different immune subsets and discuss their roles in intestinal transplant outcomes on multiple levels, focusing on chimerism and graft immune reconstitution, clonal alloreactivity, and cell phenotype. In Sections 1, 2 and 3, we lay out a shared framework for understanding intestinal transplant, focusing on the mechanisms of rejection or tolerance in the context of mucosal immunology and illustrate the unique role of the bidirectional graft-versus-host (GvH) and host-versus-graft (HvG) alloresponse. In Sections 4, 5 and 6, we further expand upon these concepts as we discuss the contribution of different cell subsets to intestinal transplant. An improved understanding of intestinal transplantation immunology will bring us closer to maximizing the potential of this important treatment.

[Indications and results of intestinal transplantation for short bowel syndrome after mesenteric ischemia]

BACKGROUND

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is the only causal treatment for complicated chronic intestinal failure after mesenteric ischemia and impending failure of parenteral supplementation. Isolated or combined ITx with the inclusion of the intestine is associated with demanding immunological, perioperative and infection associated challenges.

AIM

The characterization of chronic intestinal failure, the indications, transplant survival, transplantation techniques and success rates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Collection, summary and critical appraisal of international guidelines, the guidelines of the German Medical Chamber, and the international literature.

RESULTS

The first successful ITx were performed in 1987 and 1988 at the University of Kiel Germany and the University of Pittsburgh, USA. The number of ITx rose continuously but in phases from the end of the 1990s to over 200 per year but has currently decreased to 100-150 per year due to optimized intestinal rehabilitation. While the 1‑year and 3‑year transplant survival rates were 30% and 20% before 1991, they increased in phases up to 60% and 50%, respectively, after 1995 and have now achieved almost 80% and 70%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The substantial improvement in the results of ITx can be partly explained by progress in operative techniques, intensive care medicine and a better understanding of mucosal immunity; however, optimized strategies in immunosuppression as well as prevention of infectious diseases and malignancies have also made decisive contributions.

Endoscopic Surveillance of the Intestinal Allograft: Recommendations From the Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant Association Working Group

Intestinal transplant (ITx) rejection lacks a reliable noninvasive biomarker and rejection surveillance relies on serial endoscopies and mucosal biopsies followed by histologic assessment. Endoscopic biopsies are also essential for identifying other ITx-related complications such as infectious, allergic, and inflammatory graft enteritis as well as post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease or graft versus host disease. In spite of its central role in ITx, published guidelines on endoscopy and biopsy are lacking and significant variability between centers in terms of timing and technical performance exists. Therefore, an international expert group convened and discussed several aspects related to the surveillance endoscopy after ITx with the aim to summarize and standardize its practice. This article summarizes these considerations on endoscopic ITx monitoring and highlights practices of surveillance and for-cause endoscopy, biopsy techniques, pathologic evaluation, potential risks and complications, outsourcing, and less-invasive monitoring techniques.

Including the liver in the visceral allograft: Impact on donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and long-term outcomes

Humoral immunity emerges as a risk factor for graft failure after visceral transplantation (VTx) and development of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) has been linked with poor outcomes. In most cases, a simultaneous liver transplant can be safely performed in sensitized patients with DSA and appears protective against lymphocytotoxic antibodies. We investigated the incidence of acute (AR) and chronic rejection (CR) in 32 VTx without any B cell-depleting pre-treatment (6 isolated intestinal transplants (IT) and 26 liver-containing, multivisceral transplants (MVT) and assessed the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) pre- and post-transplantation. Twenty-one patients (65 %) developed AR, 15 (57 %) of the MVT and 6 (100 %) of the IT (p = 0.05). CR occurred in 4 IT (60 %, p < 0.001). At one month, de novo DSA were present in 71 % of VTx (66 % MVT vs 100 % IT, p = 0.09). At the last available follow-up, 69 % of the MVT and 50 % of the IT patients were DSA-free. De novo DSA seemed more persistent (7/19, 37 %) than pre-Tx DSA (1/6, 17 %; p = n.s.), de novo DSA were more frequently specific for HLA class II than class I, 16/19 (84 %) vs. 7/19 (37 %; p = 0.003), and HLA-DQ was their most frequent target HLA. DQ mismatches appeared to be a risk factor for developing de novo DSA. In conclusion, liver-containing visceral allografts have superior short- and long-term outcomes compared with liver-free allografts. De novo DSA develop early and frequently after VTx performed without B cell-depleting induction therapy, but the exact role of DSA in the pathogenesis of rejection remains unclear.

Effects of fecal stream deprivation on human intestinal barrier after loop ileostomy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Intestinal homeostasis is closely associated with the normal intestinal luminal physiological environment. Temporary loop ileostomy changes the intestinal structure and diverts the fecal stream, thereby disturbing the intestinal environment. This study aimed to clarify the changing situation of the human intestinal mucosa barrier in the absence of a fecal stream after loop ileostomy.

METHODS

We obtained paired samples from the fed (fecal stream maintained) and unfed (no fecal stream) portions of the loop ileostomy and subjected these samples to RNA sequencing. We also determined transepithelial electrical resistance. The mucus layer thickness and content of MUC2, tight junction proteins, and common antimicrobial peptides in ileum mucosa were studied.

RESULTS

Transcriptome data revealed that genes associated with enhancing the intestinal barrier function of the unfed ileum were significantly decreased and genes associated with immune defense response were significantly increased. The transepithelial electrical resistance was lower and the mucus layer thickness was thinner in the unfed ileal mucosa than in the fed ileum. The MUC2, Occludin, and zonula occludens 1 content was lower in the unfed ileum than in the fed ileum. α-Defensin 5, α-defensin 6, and lysozyme content was higher in the unfed ileum than in the enterally fed ileum.

CONCLUSION

Intestinal barrier function is weakened after long-term fecal diversion, but antimicrobiota defense function is strengthened. Thus, the intestinal mucosa barrier adopts an alternative stable state during fecal diversion, which may explain the clinical paucity of cases of enterogenic infection caused by loop ileostomy.

Endoscopic ultrasound in the monitoring of the intestinal allograft

Objective

Chronic rejection (CR) of the small intestinal allograft includes mucosal fibrosis, bowel thickening and arteriopathy in the outer wall layers and the mesentery. CR lacks non-invasive markers and reliable diagnostic methods. We evaluated endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as a novel approach for monitoring of the intestinal allograft with respect to CR.

Design

In intestinal graft recipients, EUS and enteroscopy with ileal mucosal biopsy were performed via the ileostomy. At EUS, the wall thickness of the intestinal graft was measured in standard mode, whereas the resistive index (RI) of the supplying artery was assessed in pulsed Doppler mode. At enteroscopy, the intestinal mucosa was assessed. Findings were compared with histopathology and clinical follow-up.

Results

EUS was successfully performed in all 11 patients (adequate clinical course (AC) n=9; CR n=2) after a median interval of 1537 days (range: 170–5204), post-transplantation. The total diameter of the wall (layer I–V) was comparable in all patients. Meanwhile, the diameter of the outermost part (layer IV–V; that is, muscularis propria–serosa) was among the two CR patients (range: 1.3–1.4 mm) in the upper end of measurements as compared with the nine AC patients (range: 0.5–1.4 mm). The RI was >0.9 in both CR patients, while the RI was ≤0.8 in all AC patients. Both CR patients had abnormal findings at enteroscopy and histopathology and deceased during follow-up.

Conclusion

EUS is a promising tool providing detailed information on the intestinal graft morphology and rheology, which may be used for assessment of potential CR in long-term follow-up of intestinal allograft recipients.

The role of endoscopy in the small intestinal transplant recipient: A review

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is the treatment of choice for patients with intestinal failure who have developed life-threatening complications related to long-term parenteral nutrition. Patients may also undergo ITx as part of a combined liver-intestine or multivisceral transplant for a variety of indications, most commonly intestinal failure-associated liver disease or porto-mesenteric thrombosis. Endoscopy plays a critical role in the posttransplant management of these patients, most commonly in the diagnosis and management of rejection, which occurs in up to 30-40% of patients within the first-year posttransplant. With a lack of noninvasive biomarkers to identify the presence of rejection, endoscopy and biopsy remain the gold standard for its diagnosis. Endoscopic evaluation of the graft is also important in the identification of other complications post-ITx, including posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, graft-versus-host disease, and enteric infections. Each patient's posttransplant anatomy may be slightly different, making endoscopy sometimes technically challenging and necessitating clear and frequent communication with the surgical team in order to help identify the highest yield approach. Herein, we review the most common pathologies found endoscopically in the post-ITx patient and describe some of the unique challenges the endoscopist faces when evaluating these complex patients.

Long-term outcomes of intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, data from the intestinal transplant registry, recent publications and reviews in the field will be used to describe mortality, morbidity, complications, nutritional and psychosocial outcomes in intestinal transplant recipients with a focus on those furthest out from transplant.

RECENT FINDINGS

Registry data show static long-term survival data (41% 10-year survival in the most recent analysis), but experienced centres report improvements with survival between 60 and 70% at 10 years. Chronic rejection remains a problem for long-term graft survival, but understanding of humoral immunity is increasing. Nutritional outcomes are good with most recipients achieving enteral autonomy with an unrestricted diet. Health-related quality of life data generally shows improvement in the years after transplant, educational attainment is good, but some patients have ongoing psychosocial problems.

SUMMARY

Most patients do well in the long-term after transplant. Survival outcomes have improved in experienced centres, and nutrition and quality of life outcomes are good. Recognition of psychosocial outcomes is increasing. Nevertheless, challenges remain in areas such as infectious complications, renal function, chronic rejection, social support and mental health.

Late graft loss after intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite improvement in short-term outcomes after intestinal transplantation in the last 20 years, long-term rates of graft attrition and patient survival remain unchanged, with worse outcomes compared with other solid organ transplants. This review investigates the multiple causes of late graft loss, including chronic rejection, infection, graft-versus-host disease, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and postsurgical complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

New insights into immunology of the intestine and evolution of immunosuppression, as well as review of current persistent causes of late graft loss, shed light on findings that may help improve long-term intestinal allograft survival.

SUMMARY

Although intestinal transplantation remains a life-saving intervention with significant advancements since its inception, further understanding of mechanisms of injury is needed to improve long-term outcomes and prevent late intestinal graft loss.

Intestinal transplantation: an overview of the recent experimental studies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Experimental intestinal transplantation (ITx ) has generated invaluable knowledge that has ultimately benefited the clinical activity. Herein, we appraise the recent publications pertaining to experimental ITx and highlight the main current research topics.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the recent years, ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have gradually replaced acute rejection as the main research topic. New additives to established preservation solutions and relatively novel approaches such as luminal interventions during cold storage may prolong the storage time and alleviate IRI. High donor age does not seem to worsen preservation injury. The ischemic susceptibility seems to differ between species, which may impact the translatability of the experimental findings. A new experimental model of modified multivisceral transplantation including the donor spleen may offer a new tool with which to study GVHD, besides the classical Lewis-Brown Norway rat combination. Flushing the graft with fludarabine may mitigate GVHD in rats. T-cell activation inhibitor-mitochondrial was downregulated in the peripheral blood leukocytes before other signs of acute and severe chronic rejection could be observed.

SUMMARY

Experimental research in ITx has largely shifted focus from acute rejection to IRI and GVHD. Several lines of research have matured toward clinical translation, yet no breakthrough is imminent.

Pattern of organ remodeling in chronic non-communicable diseases is due to endogenous regulations and falls under the category of Kauffman's self-organization: A case of arterial neointimal pathology

Clinical diagnosis is based on analysis of pathologic findings that may result in perceived patterns. The same is true for diagnostic pathology: Pattern analysis is a foundation of the histopathology-based diagnostic system and, in conjunction with clinical and laboratory findings, forms a basis for the classification of diseases. Any histopathology diagnosis is based on the explicit assumption that the same diseased condition should result in formation of the same (or highly similar) morphologic patterns in different individuals; it is a standard approach in microscopic pathology, including that of non-communicable chronic diseases with organ remodeling. During fifty years of examining diseased tissues under microscopy, I keep asking the same question: Why is a similarity of patterns expected for chronic organ remodeling? For infection diseases, xenobiotic toxicity and deficiencies forming an identical pathologic pattern in different individuals is understandable and logical: The same infection, xenobiotic, or deficiency strikes the same target, which results in identical pathology. The same is true for Mendelian diseases: The same mutations lead to the same altered gene expressions and the same pathologic pattern. But why does this regularity hold true for chronic diseases with organ remodeling? Presumable causes (or risk factors) for a particular chronic disease differ in magnitude and duration between individuals, which should result in various series of transformations. Yet, mysteriously enough, pathological remodeling in a particular chronic disease always falls into a main dominating pattern, perpetuating and progressing in a similar fashion in different patients. Furthermore, some chronic diseases of different etiologies and dissimilar causes/risk factors manifest as identical or highly similar patterns of pathologic remodeling. HYPOTHESIS: I hypothesize that regulations governing a particular organ's chronic remodeling were selected in evolution as the safest response to various insults and physiologic stress conditions. This hypothesis implies that regulations directing diseased chronic remodeling always preexist but normally are controlled; this control can be disrupted by a diverse range of non-specific signals, liberating the pathway for identical pathologic remodeling. This hypothesis was tested in an analysis of arterial neointimal formation, the identical pathology occurring in different diseases and pathological conditions: graft vascular disease in organ transplantation, in-stent restenosis, peripheral arterial diseases, idiopathic intimal hyperplasia, Kawasaki disease, coronary atherosclerosis and as reaction to drugs. The hypothesis suggests that arterial intimal cells are poised between only two alternative pathways: the pathway with controlled intimal cell proliferation or the pathway where such control is disrupted, ultimately leading to the progressive neointimal pathology. By this property the arterial neointimal formation constitutes a special case of Kauffman's self-organization. This new hypothesis gives a parsimonious explanation for identical pathological patterns of arterial remodeling (neointimal formation), which occurs in diseases of different etiologies and due to dissimilar causes/risk factors, or without any etiology and causes/risk factors at all. This new hypothesis also suggests that regulation facilitating intimal cell proliferation cannot be overwritten or annulled because this feature is vital for arterial differentiation, cell renewal, and integrity. This hypothesis suggests that studying numerous, and likely interchangeable, non-specific signals that disrupt regulation controlling intimal cell proliferation is unproductive; instead, a study of the controlling regulation(s) itself should be a priority of our research.

Current outcomes after pediatric and adult intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, we will review the outcomes of patients with intestinal transplant (ITx) with a focus on factors affecting long-term graft and patient survival.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most recent International Intestinal Transplant Registry reports a 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival of 71%, 50%, and 41% respectively, for ITx grafts transplanted since 2000. Over the past decades, significant improvements have been achieved in short-term graft and patient outcomes for ITx recipients. The improvement in short-term outcomes may be related to the focused treatment of antihuman leukocyte antigen antibodies, the use of induction immunotherapy protocols, refinements in surgical techniques, establishment of dedicated ITx units, and improved postoperative management.However, long-term graft and patient outcomes for ITx recipients remain stagnant. Issues impairing long-term outcomes of ITx include the challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, progressive decline in renal function, and long-term infectious and malignancy risks especially related to cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after ITx.

SUMMARY

Addressing and preventing early and late complications is the key to improving short-term and long-term outcomes after ITx.

Characterization of T cell immunophenotypes in intestinal transplantation: A pilot study

Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells has been shown to be a useful, non-invasive method of predicting acute cellular rejection (ACR) following intestinal transplantation (ITx). Our objectives were to characterize differences in the T cell immunophenotype of ITx recipients in peripheral blood samples (1) collected late versus early after ITx and (1) associated with episodes of ACR and infectious enteritis. An IRB-approved, cross-sectional study of ITx recipients was performed. Peripheral blood samples were collected during normal visits and episodes of allograft dysfunction. A total of 38 patients were included in the analysis: 31 ITx recipients (87% liver-inclusive allografts) and 7 intestinal failure control patients. Of the ITx patients, 26 patients were pediatric patients (<21 years). A total of 70 samples were analyzed from ITx recipients, including 51 during normal visits and 19 during episodes of allograft dysfunction (median of 2 samples per patient; range of 1-6 samples per patient). In the late (n = 32) versus early post-ITx (n = 19) normal samples, there was a significantly higher percentage of central memory CD4 T cells (p = .001). In the ACR (n = 5) versus infectious enteritis (n = 14) samples, there was a higher percentage of CD8 T cells expressing HLA-DR (p = .002), CD57 (p < .001), and KLRG1 (p < .001) and a higher percentage of CD4 T cells expressing CD57 (p = .03). Additional studies are needed with larger cohorts to validate these changes in the T cell immunophenotype. Further elucidating T cell immunophenotypes in ITx will lead to a better understanding of immune mechanisms of allograft dysfunction, identification of potential biomarkers in ITx, and optimized selection of immunosuppressive therapies.