1
|
Ollech JE, Eran-Banai H, Goren I, Sharar Fischler T, Avni-Biron I, Snir Y, Broitman Y, Cohen S, Friedenberg A, Pauker MH, Dotan I, Yanai H. Tofacitinib is an effective treatment for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, and intestinal ultrasound can discriminate response from non-response: a pragmatic prospective real-world study. Ann Med 2024; 56:2358183. [PMID: 38813808 PMCID: PMC11141311 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2358183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Real-world data on tofacitinib's effectiveness is limited and mainly retrospective or registry-based. We elected to conduct a pragmatic prospective study to assess the efficacy of tofacitinib for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC), aiming to evaluate the ability of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) to discriminate responders vs. non-responders in real-time. METHODS This pragmatic prospective clinical study included consecutive adult patients starting tofacitinib treatment for active moderate to severe UC. Patients were evaluated at baseline and after 8 weeks of tofacitinib (clinical, biomarker, endoscopy, and IUS). The primary outcome was clinical response defined by a decrease in the full Mayo score (fMS) of ≥3 at week 8. Next, we explored ultrasonographic parameters in the sigmoid colon as potential real-time classifiers to differentiate between responders and non-responders at week 8. RESULTS Overall, 30 adult patients started tofacitinib; the median age was 26.3 years (IQR 22.5-39.8), and 50% were female. Most patients (86.6%) had left-sided or extensive colitis, 96.7% had previously failed biologic therapy, and 60% (18/30) were on oral corticosteroids at the start of tofacitinib. At week 8, clinical response (a decrease in the fMS ≥ 3) and remission (fMS ≤ 2) rates were 40% (12/30) and 20% (6/30), respectively. Biomarker response (FC < 250µg/g) and biomarker normalization (FC ≤ 100µg/g) were achieved in 47.6% (10/21) and 38.1% (8/21) of patients, respectively. Endoscopic healing (endoscopic Mayo sub-score [EMS] ≤ 1) was achieved in 33.3% (10/30) of patients. Sigmoid bowel wall normalization as assessed by IUS (sBWT ≤ 3) was achieved in 18.2% (4/22). The best sBWT cut-off at week 8 to accurately classify endoscopic healing vs. no healing was a sBWT of 3.6 mm (AUC of 0.952 [95% CI: 0.868-1.036], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In this real-world pragmatic prospective study, tofacitinib was an effective treatment for moderate to severe UC, and IUS at week 8 accurately discriminated treatment response from non-response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob E. Ollech
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hagar Eran-Banai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Idan Goren
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, U.S.A
| | - Tali Sharar Fischler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Irit Avni-Biron
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yifat Snir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yelena Broitman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shaked Cohen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Adi Friedenberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Maor H. Pauker
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Iris Dotan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Henit Yanai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cataletti G, Schwartz DA, Maconi G. Tofacitinib in Chronic Inflammatory Pouch Diseases: A Systematic Review. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:975-977. [PMID: 38085961 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Cataletti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical & Clinical Sciences, "L.Sacco" Hospital, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - David A Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Giovanni Maconi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical & Clinical Sciences, "L.Sacco" Hospital, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ribaldone DG, Testa G, Verstockt B, Molnar T, Savarino E, Schmidt C, Vieujean S, Teich N, Meianu C, Juillerat P, Grellier N, Lobaton T. Treatment of Antibiotic Refractory Chronic Pouchitis With JAK Inhibitors and S1P Receptor Modulators: An ECCO CONFER Multicentre Case Series. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:720-726. [PMID: 37965867 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data regarding the effectiveness and safety of Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate [S1P] receptor modulators in antibiotic refractory chronic pouchitis [CARP] are lacking. METHODS This ECCO-CONFER project retrospectively collected data for JAK inhibitor or S1P receptor modulator treatments for CARP with at least 3 months of follow-up. The outcomes included corticosteroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response and remission at 3 and 12 months, and trends in modified pouchitis disease activity index [mPDAI], endoscopic PDAI, C-reactive protein, and calprotectin. RESULTS Seventeen treatments in 15 patients were evaluated. Previous pouchitis treatments included infliximab [5/15], adalimumab [4/15], vedolizumab [9/15], and ustekinumab [5/15]. Pooling data on JAK inhibitors [eight tofacitinib, one filgotinib, and six upadacitinib] after 3 months [T3], steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response was achieved in 53.3% [8/15], and steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical remission was achieved in 40% [6/15]. Of the patients with at least 12 months of follow-up, steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response was achieved in 50% [3/6] and remission in one patient [16.7%], endoscopic response in 50% [3/6], and endoscopic remission in 50% [3/6]. Of the two ozanimod treatments at T3, steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response was achieved in one patient, without remission; both discontinued ozanimod before T12. No side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS Small molecules may represent a suitable option for CARP refractory to multiple biologics, deserving further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giulia Testa
- Gastroenterology-U, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Carsten Schmidt
- Medical Clinic II, Hospital Fulda, Fulda, Germany
- Medical Faculty of the Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Sophie Vieujean
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Niels Teich
- Medical Faculty of the Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
- Gastroenterology Practice, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Corina Meianu
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- Gastroenterology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Pascal Juillerat
- Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Bern University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
- Crohn and Colitis Center, Gastro-enterologie Beaulieu SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nathan Grellier
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Triana Lobaton
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Resál T, Bacsur P, Keresztes C, Bálint A, Bor R, Fábián A, Farkas B, Katsanos K, Michalopoylos G, Ribaldone DG, Attauabi M, Zhao M, Barak HA, Yanai H, Bezzio C, Rispo A, Castiglione F, Bar-Gil Shitrit A, Pugliese D, Armuzzi A, Savarino EV, Kolar M, Lukáš M, Chashkova E, Filip R, Rozieres A, Nancey S, Krznarić Ž, Schäfer E, Szamosi T, Sarlós P, Franko M, Drobne D, Knyazev OV, Kagramanova AV, Limdi J, Wetwittayakhlang P, Lakatos PL, Maharshak N, Bannon L, Nyári T, Szepes Z, Farkas K, Molnár T. Real-Life Efficacy of Tofacitinib in Various Situations in Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Worldwide Multicenter Collaborative Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30:768-779. [PMID: 37542737 PMCID: PMC11063556 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Tofacitinib (TFB) appears to be effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC); however, available real-world studies are limited by cohort size. TFB could be an option in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). We aimed to investigate efficacy and safety of TFB in moderate-to-severe colitis and ASUC. METHODS This retrospective, international cohort study enrolling UC patients with ≥6-week follow-up period was conducted from February 1 to July 31, 2022. Indications were categorized as ASUC and chronic activity (CA). Baseline demographic and clinical data were obtained. Steroid-free remission (SFR), colectomy, and safety data were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 391 UC patients (median age 38 [interquartile range, 28-47] years; follow-up period 26 [interquartile range, 14-52] weeks) were included. A total of 27.1% received TFB in ASUC. SFR rates were 23.7% (ASUC: 26.0%, CA: 22.8%) at week 12 and 41.1% (ASUC: 34.2%, CA: 43.5%) at week 52. The baseline partial Mayo score (odds ratio [OR], 0.850; P = .006) was negatively associated with week 12 SFR, while biologic-naïve patients (OR, 2.078; P = .04) more likely achieved week 52 SFR. The colectomy rate at week 52 was higher in ASUC group (17.6% vs 5.7%; P < .001) and decreased with age (OR, 0.94; P = .013). A total of 67 adverse events were reported, and 17.9% resulted in cessation of TFB. One case of thromboembolic event was reported. CONCLUSIONS TFB is effective in both studied indications. TFB treatment resulted in high rates of SFR in the short and long terms. Higher baseline disease activity and previous biological therapies decreased efficacy. No new adverse event signals were found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Resál
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Péter Bacsur
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Csilla Keresztes
- Department for Medical Communication and Translation Studies, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Anita Bálint
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Renáta Bor
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Anna Fábián
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Bernadett Farkas
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Kostas Katsanos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - George Michalopoylos
- Gastroenterology Department, General Hospital of Athens G. Gennimatas, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Mohamed Attauabi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Mirabella Zhao
- Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Hadar Amir Barak
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Henit Yanai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Cristina Bezzio
- IBD Unit/Gastroenterology Unit, Rho Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Rho, Italy
| | - Antonio Rispo
- IBD Unit Department, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabiana Castiglione
- IBD Unit Department, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Ariella Bar-Gil Shitrit
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Daniela Pugliese
- IBD Center, Centro Malattie Apparato Digerente, Unità Operativa Complessa di Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- IBD Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Martin Kolar
- IVth Medical Department, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Milan Lukáš
- IVth Medical Department, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Elena Chashkova
- Irkutsk Scientific Center of Surgery and Traumatology, Irkutsk, Russia
| | - Rafał Filip
- Department of Gastroenterology with IBD, Unit of Clinical Hospital No. 2 im. Sw. Jadwigi Królowej, Rzeszow, Poland
| | - Aurore Rozieres
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Centre International de Recherche et Infectologie, INSERM U1111, Lyon, France
| | - Stéphane Nancey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Centre International de Recherche et Infectologie, INSERM U1111, Lyon, France
| | - Željko Krznarić
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- Department of Nutrition, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Eszter Schäfer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Military Hospital Medical Centre, State Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Szamosi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Military Hospital Medical Centre, State Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Patrícia Sarlós
- Division of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Matej Franko
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - David Drobne
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Oleg V Knyazev
- Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A. S. Loginov, Moscow, Russia
- National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology named after A. N. Ryzhykh, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna V Kagramanova
- Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A. S. Loginov, Moscow, Russia
- Research Institute of Health Organization and Medical Management, Moscow, Russia
| | - Jimmy Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Panu Wetwittayakhlang
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Nitsan Maharshak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Lian Bannon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Tibor Nyári
- Department of Medical Physics and Informatics, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Szepes
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Klaudia Farkas
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Tamás Molnár
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carvalhas Gabrielli AM, Ferretti F, Monico CM, Tombetti E, Maconi G, Romeo S, Piazza O Sed N, Caprioli F, Mazzola AM, Alicante S, Bertè R, Lolli E, Scribano ML, Buscarini E, Ricci C, Carmagnola S, Ardizzone S, Cannatelli R. Effect of Tofacitinib on One-Year Colectomy Risk in Anti-TNF Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Multicenter Italian Study. Dig Dis Sci 2024; 69:1785-1792. [PMID: 38530500 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08394-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor recently approved to induce and maintain remission in ulcerative colitis (UC). AIMS Considering the number of anti-TNF non-responders, this study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in a cohort of multi-failure patients with moderate-to-severe UC at 52 weeks. METHODS From January 2021 to March 2023, we performed a prospective multicenter study observing adult patients with moderate-to-severe UC starting tofacitinib after an anti-TNF failure for a 52-week-long period. Effectiveness and safety were assessed in terms of colectomy rate, clinical remission and response, endoscopic remission, steroid-free clinical remission, and rate of adverse events. RESULTS We included 58 patients with UC with an age of 42 ± 14.4 years, 59% males, 96.6% left-sided or pancolitis, who were failure to a single (65.5%) or more than one anti-TNF (34.5%). Only 6 (10.3%) patients underwent colectomy. Colectomy was clinically associated with the necessity and the number of extra cycles of tofacitinib 10 mg bid at W8 (p = 0.023) and W24 (p = 0.004), and with a higher partial Mayo score at W8 (p = 0.025). At W52, clinical remission, clinical response, and steroid-free clinical remission were 53.4%, 43.1%, and 48.3%, respectively. Of 22 performed colonoscopies at W52, 11 (50%) showed endoscopic remission. Adverse events occurred in 14 (24.1%) patients, but only 2 (3.4%) led to tofacitinib discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS In a real-life setting of patients with anti-TNF refractory UC, tofacitinib has proved to be effective in preventing colectomy and inducing clinical and endoscopic remission at 52 weeks with a good safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Carvalhas Gabrielli
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, L. Sacco Hospital, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi, 74, 20157, Milan, MI, Italy.
| | - Francesca Ferretti
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, L. Sacco Hospital, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi, 74, 20157, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Camilla Maria Monico
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, L. Sacco Hospital, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi, 74, 20157, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Enrico Tombetti
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Maconi
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, L. Sacco Hospital, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi, 74, 20157, Milan, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Samanta Romeo
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Dept, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Di Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Nicole Piazza O Sed
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Flavio Caprioli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Mazzola
- Department of Clinical and Sperimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Saverio Alicante
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Dept, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Di Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Roberto Bertè
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Dept, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Di Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Lolli
- Gastroenterology Department, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Elisabetta Buscarini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Dept, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Di Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Chiara Ricci
- Department of Clinical and Sperimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Spedali Civili Di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefania Carmagnola
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, L. Sacco Hospital, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi, 74, 20157, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Sandro Ardizzone
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, L. Sacco Hospital, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi, 74, 20157, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Rosanna Cannatelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, L. Sacco Hospital, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi, 74, 20157, Milan, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khan N, Sundararajan R, Patel M, Trivedi C, Yang YX. Effectiveness of Tofacitinib in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Nationwide Veterans Administration Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2024:00000434-990000000-01074. [PMID: 38483302 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is paucity of data on the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib among elderly patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS Through a retrospective cohort study among the US National Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, we evaluated effectiveness among the elderly (≥65) and young (<65) patients with UC initiated on tofacitinib. RESULTS Among 158 patients (53 elderly, 105 young), effectiveness at 12 months was 50.94% in the elderly and 33.33% in the young ( P = 0.032). DISCUSSION In a nationwide cohort of patients with UC initiating tofacitinib, effectiveness was seen in half of the elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabeel Khan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ramaswamy Sundararajan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Manthankumar Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chinmay Trivedi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yu-Xiao Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vieujean S, Laharie D, Buisson A, Roblin X, Fumery M, Nancey S, Wils P, Altwegg R, Seidel L, Caron B, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Histological healing induced by tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis: A multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:613-621. [PMID: 38065698 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the efficacy of tofacitinib to induce and maintain clinical and endoscopic remission is well established in ulcerative colitis (UC), little is known about its efficacy to induce histological remission. METHODS We conducted a retrospective multicentric cohort study. UC patients ≥ 16 years treated by tofacitinib in whom histological activity has been evaluated before and after induction were eligible. The primary endpoint was the histological remission at the end of induction, assessed by the Nancy index and the epithelial neutrophilic infiltrate. RESULTS A total of 42 patients with UC (93% previously exposed to an anti-TNF and 81% to vedolizumab) were included between July 2018 and April 2022 and were followed for a median duration of 84 weeks [IQR, 35-134]. At the end of induction period (whether prolonged or not), 19% and 24% of patients achieved histological remission, using the Nancy index and the epithelial neutrophilic infiltrate, respectively. Survival without tofacitinib discontinuation was significantly longer in patients without epithelial neutrophilic infiltrate at the end of induction (whether prolonged or not) compared with patients with epithelial neutrophilic infiltrate (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION Tofacitinib induced histological remission in one fifth to one quarter of patients with UC who have previously failed anti-TNF or/and vedolizumab after induction (whether prolonged or not).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Vieujean
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - David Laharie
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anthony Buisson
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Inserm, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 3iHP, Service d'Hépato-Gastro Entérologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Xavier Roblin
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Mathurin Fumery
- Gastroenterology Unit, Amiens University Hospital and PeriTox, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens UMR-IO1, France
| | - Stephane Nancey
- Gastroenterology Department CHU Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM U1111 - CIRI, Lyon, France
| | - Pauline Wils
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1286 - Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, Lille F-59000, France
| | - Romain Altwegg
- Hepato-gastroenterology Department, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Laurence Seidel
- Biostatistics and medico-economic information department, Liège, Belgium
| | - Bénédicte Caron
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy F-54500, France; INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine, Nancy F-54000, France; NFINY Institute, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy F-54500, France; FHU-CURE, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy F-54500, France
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy F-54500, France; INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine, Nancy F-54000, France; NFINY Institute, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy F-54500, France; FHU-CURE, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy F-54500, France; Groupe Hospitalier privé Ambroise Paré - Hartmann, Paris IBD centre, Neuilly sur Seine 92200, France; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bao MM, Kennedy JM, Dolinger MT, Dunkin D, Lai J, Dubinsky MC. Cytomegalovirus Colitis in a Patient with Severe Treatment Refractory Ulcerative Colitis. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2024; 6:otae014. [PMID: 38444641 PMCID: PMC10914341 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otae014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can be reactivated in ulcerative colitis (UC), but its role in progression of inflammation is unclear. Risk factors include severe colitis and treatment with immunosuppressive medications, particularly corticosteroids and immunomodulators. Methods We report a case of cytomegalovirus colitis in a pediatric patient with pancolitis who had been refractory to aminosalicylate, infliximab, and ustekinumab and was in clinical remission and with transmural response on upadacitinib. Results This is a case of a 13-year-old male with UC refractory to multiple therapies who were in clinical remission on upadacitinib 30 mg daily. He developed an acute increase in symptoms and did not respond to therapy escalation with increased upadacitinib 45 mg daily for 2 weeks and prednisone for 1 week. He was diagnosed with cytomegalovirus colitis on flexible sigmoidoscopy biopsy. He was treated with intravenous ganciclovir with tapering of immunosuppressive regimen. Despite initial response, he underwent subtotal colectomy and subsequent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal-anastomosis. Conclusions Despite our patient having multiple risk factors for developing CMV colitis, upadacitinib may have played a role when considering its known impact on the herpes family of viruses. CMV colitis should be evaluated for in any patient who presents with worsening symptoms without evidence of other infection or response to increase in therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Bao
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Susan and Leonard Feinstein Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Juliana M Kennedy
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Susan and Leonard Feinstein Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Michael T Dolinger
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Susan and Leonard Feinstein Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - David Dunkin
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Susan and Leonard Feinstein Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Joanne Lai
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Susan and Leonard Feinstein Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Marla C Dubinsky
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Susan and Leonard Feinstein Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Honap S, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Are All Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Inflammatory Bowel Disease the Same? Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2023; 19:727-738. [PMID: 38404416 PMCID: PMC10885424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are chronic, progressive inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) and are without a known cure. Janus kinase (JAK) is a family of cytosolic tyrosine kinases that mediate signal transduction in response to extracellular stimuli. Abrogating the proinflammatory cytokine signaling cascades using JAK inhibitors (jakinibs) has been shown to be highly effective in the treatment of numerous inflammatory diseases, including IBD. Jakinibs currently licensed for moderate-to-severe IBD include the first-generation, nonselective tofacitinib and the second-generation JAK1-selective inhibitors filgotinib (licensed outside of the United States) and upadacitinib; several other jakinibs in the therapeutic pipeline are in various stages of clinical development. The jakinib class of small-molecule drugs share numerous commonalities such as their oral administration, nonimmunogenicity, short half-life, rapid onset of action, and the same class-wide regulatory restrictions owing to safety concerns. However, jakinibs differ on several fronts, translating into important clinical practice points for health care providers managing IBD patients. This article provides an overview of the jakinib class in IBD, examines how each drug differs in terms of pharmacology as well as efficacy and safety, and offers perspectives on challenges that remain and future opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sailish Honap
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, INFINY Institute, FHU-CURE, Nancy University Hospital, and INSERM, Nutrition-Genetics and Environmental Risk Exposure, University of Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Salvatori S, Neri B, Marafini I, Brigida M, Monteleone G. Emerging oral drug options for ulcerative colitis. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2023; 28:191-201. [PMID: 37668153 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2023.2254686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the availability of a variety of therapeutic compounds and improved management strategies, one-third of UC patients with moderate-to-severe disease do not benefit from the existing treatments or experience drug-related side effects. This has boosted intensive research focusing on the development of new drugs for UC therapy. This article aims to summarize the available evidence on oral drugs, which are now being explored in clinical trials or are ready to enter the clinics. AREAS COVERED From May 15 to June 11, we searched on PubMed using the keywords 'oral drugs ulcerative colitis,' 'ulcerative colitis clinical trials,' 'UC phase 2 and 3 trials' excluding case reports, case series, phase 1 and 4 studies, and studies about approved therapies. EXPERT OPINION The findings discussed in this article suggest that the future treatment of UC patients will be probably characterized by the possibility of using various small-molecule drugs. All these new compounds, even those belonging to the same class, differ in terms of efficacy and safety. Identification of predictors of response could help optimize the efficacy and safety of these treatments, thus improving resource allocation through a pretreatment stratification of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Salvatori
- Gastroenterology Unit, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetto Neri
- Gastroenterology Unit, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Irene Marafini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Brigida
- Gastroenterology Unit, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Monteleone
- Gastroenterology Unit, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dalal RS, Sharma PP, Bains K, Pruce JC, Allegretti JR. Clinical and Endoscopic Outcomes Through 78 Weeks of Tofacitinib Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis in a US Cohort. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023:izad242. [PMID: 37843044 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed outcomes through 78 weeks of tofacitinib therapy for UC in a real-world setting. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included adults initiating tofacitinib for UC from May 1, 2018, to April 1, 2021, at a large academic center in the United States. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission at 78 (+/-4) weeks (SFCR 78; simple clinical colitis activity index ≤2 with no corticosteroid use within 30 days). The secondary outcome was tofacitinib discontinuation due to nonresponse (treatment persistence). Additional outcomes were endoscopic response/remission and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS Seventy-three patients initiated tofacitinib, with a median follow-up of 88 weeks. Among patients with available data, 31 of 60 (51.7%) achieved SFCR 78, 21 of 47 (44.7%) achieved endoscopic remission during follow-up, and 25 of 73 (34.2%) discontinued tofacitinib during follow-up due to nonresponse (including 11 patients who required colectomy). Nineteen AEs were reported among 15 patients during follow-up: shingles (n = 4, all without documented vaccinations), deep venous thrombosis (n = 2), elevated liver enzymes (n = 2), skin abscess (n = 2), pneumonia (n = 2), possible miscarriage (n = 2), norovirus (n = 1), COVID-19 (n = 1), lymphopenia (n = 1), Clostridioides difficile infection (n = 1), and heart block (n = 1). One patient discontinued therapy due to an AE (elevated liver enzymes), and no deaths occurred. CONCLUSION Tofacitinib treatment was effective in achieving SFCR for the majority of patients with UC through 78 weeks. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of tofacitinib, and AEs requiring discontinuation were rare. Due to limitations regarding sample size, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul S Dalal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kanwal Bains
- Department of Nutrition, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jordan C Pruce
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica R Allegretti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chiorean M, Ha C, Hur P, Sharma PP, Gruben D, Khan NH. Experience with Tofacitinib in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Data from a United States Claims Database. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3985-3993. [PMID: 37639057 PMCID: PMC10516786 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08063-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). AIMS To evaluate real-world data in US patients with UC receiving tofacitinib. METHODS Characteristics and outcomes of patients with UC initiating tofacitinib between 2018 and 2019 were assessed using data from the IBM® MarketScan® claims database. The index date was the first tofacitinib claim; pre- and post-index periods were 12 months. Outcomes included tofacitinib adherence/persistence, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. RESULTS Of 276 patients with UC who initiated tofacitinib, 68 (24.6%) were bio-naïve, and 208 (75.4%) bio-experienced. At month 12, overall median tofacitinib adherence (proportion of days covered) was 0.82 (mean 0.68); 43.8% of patients discontinued tofacitinib (90-day gap). Of patients receiving OCS during the post-index 16-week tapering period, 40.4% discontinued OCS up to 12 months post-index. OCS use decreased in patients continuing tofacitinib versus those discontinuing tofacitinib (29.7% vs 59.5%, respectively). Reductions in all-cause and UC-related outpatient visits were observed for bio-naïve (- 1.34 and - 0.88, respectively) and bio-experienced (- 4.72 and - 5.16, respectively) patients, post-index. Decreased UC-related costs per year were observed for bio-experienced patients (difference in post-index vs pre-index, - US$12,448; driven by changes in pharmacy costs), but not for bio-naïve patients (US$47,152). CONCLUSIONS In this real-world analysis in a mostly bio-experienced population, the majority of US patients with UC initiating tofacitinib remained on therapy at 12 months, and OCS use was reduced with tofacitinib treatment. HCRU (all patients) and UC-related costs were reduced in bio-experienced patients. The majority of patients with ulcerative colitis starting tofacitinib in this real-world study continued therapy at 12 months; there was a reduction in the use of steroids, and a decrease in healthcare resournce utilization and costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Chiorean
- Swedish Medical Center, 751 Northeast Blakely Drive, Suite 3020, Issaquah, Seattle, WA, 98029, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | - Nabeel H Khan
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tursi A, Mocci G, Cingolani L, Savarino E, Pica R, Cocco A, Zippi M, Napolitano D, Schiavoni E, Pugliese D, Scaldaferri F, Costa F, Marzo M, Serio M, Scarcelli A, Bolognini L, Bendia E, Maconi G, Cannatelli R, Piergallini S, Bodini G, Calabrese F, Ferronato A, Pranzo G, Elisei W, Monterubbianesi R, Faggiani R, Rodinò S, Sebkova L, Grossi L, Gaiani F, Dè Angelis G, Lorenzetti R, Allegretta L, Cazzato AI, Scorza S, Della Valle N, Sacco R, Forti G, Colucci R, Tonti P, Neve V, Rocco G, Sacchi C, Zampaletta C, Pagnini C, Graziani MG, Di Paolo MC, Onidi FM, Usai Satta P, Picchio M, Papa A. Use of tofacitinib as first or second-line therapy is associated with better outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis: data from a real-world study. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:1649-1656. [PMID: 37358928 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2230126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data regarding the real-world (RW) use of tofacitinib (TOF) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are limited. We aimed to investigate TOF's RW efficacy and safety in Italian UC patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A retrospective assessment of clinical and endoscopic activity was performed according to the Mayo score. The primary endpoints were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TOF. RESULTS We enrolled 166 patients with a median follow-up of 24 (IQR 8-36) weeks. Clinical remission was achieved in 61/166 (36.7%) and 75/166 (45.2%) patients at 8-week and 24-week follow-ups, respectively. The optimization was requested in 27 (16.3%) patients. Clinical remission was achieved more frequently when TOF was used as a first/second line rather than a third/fourth line treatment (p = 0.007). Mucosal healing was reported in 46% of patients at the median follow-up time. Colectomy occurred in 8 (4.8%) patients. Adverse events occurred in 12 (5.4%) patients and severe in 3 (1.8%). One case of simple Herpes Zoster and one of renal vein thrombosis were recorded. CONCLUSIONS Our RW data confirm that TOF is effective and safe in UC patients. It performs remarkably better when used as the first/second line of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Tursi
- Territorial Gastroenterology Service, Asl Bat, Andria, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giammarco Mocci
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | - Linda Cingolani
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | - Roberta Pica
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Cocco
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Zippi
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Napolitano
- CEMAD (Digestive Disease Center), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisa Schiavoni
- CEMAD (Digestive Disease Center), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Pugliese
- CEMAD (Digestive Disease Center), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
- School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Scaldaferri
- CEMAD (Digestive Disease Center), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
- School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Costa
- IBD Unit, Department of General Surgery and Gastroenterology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Manuela Marzo
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Veris-Delli Ponti" Hospital, Scorrano (LE), Italy
| | - Mariaelena Serio
- Division of Gastroenterology, "San Salvatore" Hospital, Pesaro, Italy
| | | | - Laura Bolognini
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Digestive Endoscopy and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Ancona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Bendia
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Digestive Endoscopy and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Maconi
- Division of Gastroenterology, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosanna Cannatelli
- Division of Gastroenterology, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Piergallini
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "A. Murri" Hospital, Fermo, Italy
| | - Giorgia Bodini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "San Martino" Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Calabrese
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "San Martino" Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Pranzo
- Ambulatory for IBD Treatment, "Valle D'Itria" Hospital, Martina Franca (TA), Italy
| | - Walter Elisei
- Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Camillo-Forlanini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Faggiani
- Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Camillo-Forlanini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Rodinò
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ladislava Sebkova
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Laurino Grossi
- Gastroenterology Unit, "Spirito Santo" Hospital, "G d'Annunzio" University, Pescara, Italy
| | - Federica Gaiani
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Dè Angelis
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Roberto Lorenzetti
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Nuovo Regina Margherita" Territorial Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Allegretta
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy
| | | | - Stefano Scorza
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy
| | | | - Rodolfo Sacco
- Division of Gastroenterology, A.O. "Ospedali Riuniti", Foggia, Italy
| | - Giacomo Forti
- Division of Digestive Endoscopy, "S. Maria Goretti" Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Raffaele Colucci
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, "San Matteo Degli Infermi" Hospital, Spoleto (PG), Italy
| | - Paolo Tonti
- Division of Gastroenterology, "A. Perrino" Hospital, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Viviana Neve
- Division of Gastroenterology, "A. Perrino" Hospital, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Giulia Rocco
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Belcolle" Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Carlotta Sacchi
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Belcolle" Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Cristiano Pagnini
- Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Giovanni - Addolorata" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Paolo Usai Satta
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Brotzu" Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marcello Picchio
- Division of General Surgery, "P. Colombo" Hospital, ASL Roma 6, Velletri (Roma), Italy
| | - Alfredo Papa
- CEMAD (Digestive Disease Center), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
- School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Friedberg S, Choi D, Hunold T, Choi NK, Garcia NM, Picker EA, Cohen NA, Cohen RD, Dalal SR, Pekow J, Sakuraba A, Krugliak Cleveland N, Rubin DT. Upadacitinib Is Effective and Safe in Both Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: Prospective Real-World Experience. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:1913-1923.e2. [PMID: 36898598 PMCID: PMC11016252 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Upadacitinib is a novel selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that has shown efficacy in the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), and has received Food and Drug Administration approval for UC. We report a large real-world experience with upadacitinib in UC and CD. METHODS We performed a prospective analysis of clinical outcomes on upadacitinib in patients with UC and CD using predetermined intervals at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 as part of a formalized treatment protocol at our institution. We used the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index and the Harvey-Bradshaw index, as well as C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin to assess efficacy, and also recorded treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events. RESULTS A total of 105 patients were followed up for 8 weeks on upadacitinib, 84 of whom (44 UC patients, 40 CD patients) were initiated because of active luminal or perianal disease and included in the analysis. One hundred percent previously received anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, and 89.3% had received 2 or more advanced therapies. At 4 and 8 weeks of treatment for UC, 19 of 25 (76.0%) and 23 of 27 (85.2%) achieved clinical response and 18 of 26 (69.2%) and 22 of 27 (81.5%) achieved clinical remission, respectively. Of those who previously were tofacitinib-exposed, 7 of 9 (77.8%) achieved clinical remission by 8 weeks. In CD, 13 of 17 (76.5.%) achieved clinical response and 12 of 17 (70.6%) achieved clinical remission by 8 weeks. Of those with increased fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein levels, 62% and 64% normalized by week 8, respectively. Results were seen as early as week 2 in both UC and CD, with clinical remission rates of 36% and 56.3.%, respectively. Acne was the most commonly reported adverse event, occurring in 24 of 105 patients (22.9%). CONCLUSIONS In this large real-world experience in medically resistant patients with UC or CD, we report that upadacitinib is rapidly effective and safe, including in those who had prior tofacitinib exposure. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Chicago (IRB20-1979).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Friedberg
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David Choi
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Thomas Hunold
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Natalie K Choi
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nicole M Garcia
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Emma A Picker
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nathaniel A Cohen
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Russell D Cohen
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sushila R Dalal
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joel Pekow
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Atsushi Sakuraba
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Noa Krugliak Cleveland
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Laffleur F, Mayer AH. Oral nanoparticulate drug delivery systems for the treatment of intestinal bowel disease and colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2023; 20:1595-1607. [PMID: 38044874 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2023.2289586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The most popular method for delivering drugs locally and systemically is oral. However, the gastrointestinal tract's severe physiological (mucosal and enzymatic barrier) and physicochemical (pH) environment places restrictions on the oral drug delivery system's bioavailability and targeted design. AREAS COVERED Various nanoparticulate drug delivery systems (NPDDSs) based on lipids or polymers, such as liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, polymeric micelles, nanospheres, and nanocapsules and their application in successful treatment of serious diseases such as intestinal bowel disease and colorectal cancer (CRC). These systems can ensure advantages over conventional systems liked improved bioavailability, prolonged residence time, and enhanced solubility of poorly soluble drugs. Moreover, the nature of these NPDDSs led to numerous breakthroughs in bioavailability, active and passive targeting, controlled release, and cost-efficient production on an industrial scale in recent years. EXPERT OPINION An expert opinion on orally administrable lipid and polymer based NPDDS, the physiological barriers and their use in the treatment of intestinal bowel disease and CRC is provided within this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Laffleur
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Institute of Pharmacy, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alexander Heinz Mayer
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Institute of Pharmacy, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gupta N, Papasotiriou S, Hanauer S. The evolving role of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2023; 19:1075-1089. [PMID: 37226522 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2023.2214728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are a new class of oral therapies for the treatment of moderate-severe ulcerative colitis with additional potential for the treatment of moderate-severe Crohn's disease. In contrast to biologic therapies JAKi provide the opportunity for non-immunogenic once or twice daily oral therapies. AREAS COVERED Janus Kinase inhibitors for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease based on mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical trial and real-world data regarding safety and efficacy; focusing on regulatory approvals in the U.S. and Europe. EXPERT OPINION Janus Kinase inhibitors are considered among the 'advanced therapies' for IBD and are approved for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis in adults with pending approvals for Crohn's disease in the U.S. JAKi offer non-immunogenic, oral options for patient not responding to other conventional agents but, have been 'restricted' by the FDA to patients with inadequate response to TNF blockers. JAKi offer rapidly acting oral alternatives to biologic agents for moderate-severe ulcerative colitis where the risks of cardiovascular and thrombotic events noted in rheumatoid arthritis have not been observed in IBD clinical trials. Nevertheless, monitoring of infections (primarily herpes zoster) and risk factors for cardiovascular and thrombotic complications is appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Gupta
- Jerry L Pettis Memorial Veterans Hospitals Loma Linda Va Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Sam Papasotiriou
- Midwestern University Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| | - Stephen Hanauer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Neurath L, D'Amico F, Danese S. Emerging drugs for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: review of phase II and III clinical trials. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2023; 28:27-42. [PMID: 36876333 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2023.2186399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current therapeutic options for patients with ulcerative colitis comprise monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), alpha4/beta7 integrin, and interleukin (IL)12/23 as well as small molecules such as tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ozanimod, and filgotinib. However, many patients fail to respond to these agents or have loss of response over time. Therefore, there is a large unmet clinical need for new therapeutic agents. AREAS COVERED Here, we review recent phase 2/3 studies in active ulcerative colitis and discuss preliminary data on the efficacy (clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission) and safety of novel drugs including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, IL23 blockers, integrin inhibitors, and S1P1R modulators. EXPERT OPINION We highlight the potential impact of these agents for the future therapeutic landscape of this disease with special emphasis on clinical impact, unmet needs, safety aspects, and advanced combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Neurath
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ferdinando D'Amico
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Buisson A, Nachury M, Guilmoteau T, Altwegg R, Treton X, Fumery M, Serrero M, Leclerc E, Caillo L, Pereira B, Amiot A, Bouguen G. Real-world comparison of effectiveness between tofacitinib and vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis exposed to at least one anti-TNF agent. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 57:676-688. [PMID: 36401585 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data comparing tofacitinib and vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) are lacking. AIMS To compare the effectiveness of tofacitinib and vedolizumab in patients with UC who had prior exposure to anti-TNF therapy METHODS: In this multicentre study, we included consecutive patients with UC ≥18 years old with partial Mayo score >2 and prior anti-TNF exposure, who started tofacitinib or vedolizumab between January 2019 and June 2021. Comparisons were performed using propensity score analyses (inverse probability of treatment weighting). RESULTS Overall, 126 and 178 patients received tofacitinib and vedolizumab, respectively. Intensified induction (vedolizumab infusion at week 10 or tofacitinib 10 mg b.d until week 16) was performed in 28.5% and 41.5% of patients, respectively. After propensity-score analysis, corticosteroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤2) was achieved at week 16 in 45.1% and 40.2% of patients receiving tofacitinib and vedolizumab, respectively (aOR = 0.82 [0.35-1.91], p = 0.64). Endoscopic improvement (corticosteroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic Mayo score ≤1) (aOR = 0.23[0.08-0.65], p = 0.0032) and histological healing (endoscopic improvement + Nancy histological index ≤1) (13.4% vs 3.2%, aOR = 0.21[0.05-0.91], p = 0.023) were higher at week 16 in patients treated with tofacitinib. No factor was predictive of tofacitinib effectiveness. At least one primary failure to a biologic (OR = 0.46[0.22-0.99], p = 0.049), partial Mayo score >6 (OR = 0.39[0.17-0.90], p = 0.029) and CRP level > 30 mg/L at baseline (OR = 0.08[0.01-0.85], p = 0.036) were associated with vedolizumab failure. CONCLUSION Tofacitinib and vedolizumab are effective in UC after failure of anti-TNF agents. However, tofacitinib seems more effective, especially in severe disease and primary failure to biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Buisson
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Inserm, 3iHP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Université Clermont Auvergne, Inserm U1071, M2iSH, USC-INRA 2018, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Maria Nachury
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1286 - INFINITE - Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, Lille, France
| | - Thomas Guilmoteau
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Inserm, 3iHP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Romain Altwegg
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, CHU St Eloi Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Xavier Treton
- Gastroenterology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Clichy, France
| | - Mathurin Fumery
- CHU Amiens, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Unité Peritox, France
| | - Melanie Serrero
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Marseille Nord, Aix-Marseille, Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Eloïse Leclerc
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Inserm, 3iHP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Ludovic Caillo
- Service d'hépato-gastro-entérologie, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, DRCI, Unité de Biostatistiques, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Aurélien Amiot
- EC2M3-EA7375, Department of Gastroenterology, Groupe Hospitalier Henri Mondor-Albert Chennevier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Guillaume Bouguen
- CHU Rennes, Univ Rennes, INSERM, CIC1414, Institut NUMECAN (Nutrition Metabolism and Cancer), Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Viazis N, Drygiannakis I, Karmiris K, Theodoropoulou A, Zampeli E, Tzouvala M, Bamias G, Liatsos C, Theocharis G, Vrakas S, Tsironi E, Mathou N, Mantaka A, Christidou A, Koustenis K, Veretanos C, Papathanasiou E, Zacharopoulou E, Tribonias G, Kitsou V, Kartsoli S, Theodoulou A, Michopoulos S, Thomopoulos K, Koutroubakis IE, Mantzaris GJ. The natural history of COVID-19 in vaccinated inflammatory bowel disease patients. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:305-309. [PMID: 36658043 PMCID: PMC9843500 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
AIM Assess the characteristics of break through COVID-19 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients, despite complete vaccination. METHODS Patients who reported a COVID-19 at least 3 weeks after complete vaccination were asked to answer an on-line anonymous questionnaire which included patient and disease characteristics, vaccination history, and the evolution of COVID-19. RESULTS Among 3240 IBD patients who reported complete vaccination between 1st May 2021 and 30thJune 2022, 402 (12.4%) were infected by SARS Cov-2 [223 male, 216 Crohn's disease (CD), 186 Ulcerative Colitis (UC), mean (SD) age 42.3 (14.9) years, mean (SD) IBD duration 10.1 (9.7) years]. Three hundred and sixty-nine patients (91.8%) were infected once and 33 (8.2%) twice. The mean (SD) time between last vaccination and infection was 4.1 (1.6) months. Overall, 351 (87.3%) patients reported mild constitutional and/or respiratory symptoms, 34 (8.4%) were asymptomatic and only 17 patients (4.2%) required hospitalization. Of hospitalized patients, 2 UC patients died of COVID-19 pneumonia. The remaining hospitalized patients did not need high flow oxygen supply or ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS A minority of completely vaccinated IBD patients developed COVID-19 which evolved with mild symptoms and a favorable outcome. These results reinforce the importance of vaccination especially in vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Viazis
- Gastroenterology Department, Evangelismos-Polykliniki General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - I Drygiannakis
- Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - K Karmiris
- Gastroenterology Department, Venizeleio General Hospital Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - A Theodoropoulou
- Gastroenterology Department, Venizeleio General Hospital Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - E Zampeli
- Gastroenterology Department, Alexandra General Hospital, Greece
| | - M Tzouvala
- Gastroenterology Department, General Hospital Nikaia Piraeus Agios Panteleimon-General Hospital Dytikis Attikis Agia Varvara, Greece
| | - G Bamias
- Gastroenterology Unit, 3rd Academic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sotiria Hospital, Greece
| | - C Liatsos
- Gastroenterology Department, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Greece
| | - G Theocharis
- Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Patras, Greece
| | - S Vrakas
- Gastroenterology Department, Tzaneio Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - E Tsironi
- Gastroenterology Department, Metaxa Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - N Mathou
- Gastroenterology Department, "Konstantopoulio-Patision" General District Hospital, Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece
| | - A Mantaka
- Gastroenterology Department, General Hospital of Chania, Crete, Greece
| | - A Christidou
- Gastroenterology Department, Evangelismos-Polykliniki General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - K Koustenis
- Gastroenterology Department, Evangelismos-Polykliniki General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ch Veretanos
- Gastroenterology Department, Evangelismos-Polykliniki General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - E Papathanasiou
- Gastroenterology Department, Alexandra General Hospital, Greece
| | - E Zacharopoulou
- Gastroenterology Department, General Hospital Nikaia Piraeus Agios Panteleimon-General Hospital Dytikis Attikis Agia Varvara, Greece
| | - G Tribonias
- Gastroenterology Department, General Hospital Nikaia Piraeus Agios Panteleimon-General Hospital Dytikis Attikis Agia Varvara, Greece
| | - V Kitsou
- Gastroenterology Unit, 3rd Academic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sotiria Hospital, Greece
| | - S Kartsoli
- Gastroenterology Department, Tzaneio Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - A Theodoulou
- Gastroenterology Department, Metaxa Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - S Michopoulos
- Gastroenterology Department, Alexandra General Hospital, Greece
| | - K Thomopoulos
- Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Patras, Greece
| | - I E Koutroubakis
- Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - G J Mantzaris
- Gastroenterology Department, Evangelismos-Polykliniki General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Malatani RT, Bilal S, Mahmood A, Sarfraz RM, Zafar N, Ijaz H, Rehman U, Akbar S, Alkhalidi HM, Gad HA. Development of Tofacitinib Loaded pH-Responsive Chitosan/Mucin Based Hydrogel Microparticles: In-Vitro Characterization and Toxicological Screening. Gels 2023; 9:gels9030187. [PMID: 36975636 PMCID: PMC10048094 DOI: 10.3390/gels9030187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Tofacitinib is an antirheumatic drug characterized by a short half-life and poor permeability, which necessitates the development of sustained release formulation with enhanced permeability potential. To achieve this goal, the free radical polymerization technique was employed to develop mucin/chitosan copolymer methacrylic acid (MU-CHI-Co-Poly (MAA))-based hydrogel microparticles. The developed hydrogel microparticles were characterized for EDX, FTIR, DSC, TGA, X-ray diffraction, SEM, drug loading; equilibrium swelling (%), in vitro drug release, sol–gel (%) studies, size and zeta potential, permeation, anti-arthritic activities, and acute oral toxicity studies. FTIR studies revealed the incorporation of the ingredients into the polymeric network, while EDX studies depicted the successful loading of tofacitinib into the network. The thermal analysis confirmed the heat stability of the system. SEM analysis displayed the porous structure of the hydrogels. Gel fraction showed an increasing tendency (74–98%) upon increasing the concentrations of the formulation ingredients. Formulations coated with Eudragit (2% w/w) and sodium lauryl sulfate (1% w/v) showed increased permeability. The formulations equilibrium swelling (%) increased (78–93%) at pH 7.4. Maximum drug loading and release (%) of (55.62–80.52%) and (78.02–90.56%), respectively, were noticed at pH 7.4, where the developed microparticles followed zero-order kinetics with case II transport. Anti-inflammatory studies revealed a significant dose-dependent decrease in paw edema in the rats. Oral toxicity studies confirmed the biocompatibility and non-toxicity of the formulated network. Thus, the developed pH-responsive hydrogel microparticles seem to have the potential to enhance permeability and control the delivery of tofacitinib for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rania T. Malatani
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sana Bilal
- Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Asif Mahmood
- Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Chakwal, Chakwal 48800, Pakistan
- Correspondence: (A.M.); (H.A.G.)
| | | | - Nadiah Zafar
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, Bandar, PuncakAlam 42300, Malaysia
| | - Hira Ijaz
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pak-Austria Fachhochschule: Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology, Mang, Khanpur Road, Haripur 22620, Pakistan
| | - Umaira Rehman
- College of Pharmacy, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
| | - Shehla Akbar
- Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan
| | - Hala M. Alkhalidi
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Heba A. Gad
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmacy Program, Batterjee Medical College, P.O. Box 6231, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia
- Correspondence: (A.M.); (H.A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
REMIT-UC: Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Tofacitinib for Moderate-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Canadian IBD Research Consortium Multicenter National Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:861-871. [PMID: 36580497 PMCID: PMC10144270 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS REMIT-UC is a Canadian multicenter cohort study. Standardized data collection was performed on 334 consecutive adult outpatients with UC treated with tofacitinib. The primary outcomes were achievement of clinical and endoscopic remission. Safety outcomes were reported using incidence rates (events/100 patient-years of exposure). A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate predictors of loss of response after tofacitinib dose de-escalation to 5 mg twice daily (BID). RESULTS Clinical remission was achieved by 35.3% (106/300), 36.0% (104/289), and 35.2% (93/264) of patients at weeks 12, 24, and 52, respectively. Endoscopic remission was achieved by 18.5% (15/81), 23.0% (28/122), and 25.7% (35/136) of patients at weeks 12, 24, and 52, respectively. Incidence of serious infections, herpes zoster, and venous thromboembolism were 2.1 [0.9-4.2], 0.5 [0.1-1.9], and 1.1 [0.3-2.7], respectively. Among responders, 44.5% (109/245) lost response during follow-up, which was recaptured in 54.9% (39/71) of patients who re-escalated to 10 mg BID. Patients with a baseline Mayo endoscopic score of 3 (adjusted hazard ratio 3.60 [95% confidence interval: 1.70-7.62]) and prior biologic failure (adjusted hazard ratio 3.89 [95% confidence interval: 1.28-11.86]) were at a higher risk for losing response after dose reduction. DISCUSSION One-third of patients with UC treated with tofacitinib achieved clinical remission with few serious adverse events. However, half of patients lost response with de-escalation, which was only partially recaptured with increasing the maintenance dose. Those with negative prognostic factors should be counselled about the risks and benefits of continuing high doses of tofacitinib.
Collapse
|
22
|
Shin SH, Oh K, Hong SN, Lee J, Oh SJ, Kim ES, Na SY, Kang SB, Koh SJ, Bang KB, Jung SA, Jung SH, Kim KO, Park SH, Yang SK, Choi CH, Ye BD. Real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis: a KASID multicenter cohort study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231154103. [PMID: 36950251 PMCID: PMC10026122 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231154103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Tofacitinib is a small molecule that inhibits Janus kinase and has been reported to be effective in Western patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the real-life data on tofacitinib in Asian UC patients are limited. Objective To investigate the real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib induction and maintenance treatment in Korean patients with UC. Design This was a retrospective study on patients with UC who received tofacitinib treatment at 12 hospitals in Korea between January 2018 and November 2020. Methods Clinical remission at week 52, defined as a partial Mayo score of ⩽2 with a combined rectal bleeding subscore and stool frequency subscore of ⩽1, was used as the primary outcome. Adverse events (AEs), including herpes zoster and deep vein thrombosis, were also evaluated. Results A total of 148 patients with UC were started on tofacitinib. Clinical remission rates of 60.6%, 54.9%, and 52.8% were reported at weeks 16, 24, and 52, respectively. Clinical response rates of 71.8%, 67.6%, and 59.9% were reported at weeks 16, 24, and 52, respectively. Endoscopic remission rates at weeks 16 and 52 were 52.4% and 30.8% based on the Mayo endoscopic subscore and 20.7% and 15.2% based on the UC endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS), respectively. A higher UCEIS at baseline was negatively associated with clinical response [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.774, p = 0.029] and corticosteroid-free clinical response (aOR: 0.782, p = 0.035) at week 52. AEs occurred in 19 patients (12.8%) and serious AEs in 12 patients (8.1%). Herpes zoster occurred in four patients (2.7%). One patient (0.7%) suffered from deep vein thrombosis. Conclusions Tofacitinib was an effective induction and maintenance treatment with an acceptable safety profile in Korean patients with UC. Plain language summary Real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib treatment in Korean patients with ulcerative colitis Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory disorder of the colonic mucosa that usually presents with bloody diarrhea and abdominal pain. Tofacitinib is a small molecule that inhibits Janus kinase and has been reported to be effective in Western patients with UC. However, real-life data on the effectiveness of tofacitinib in Asian patients with UC are limited. To investigate the real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib treatment in Korean patients with UC, we retrospectively analyzed the data of 148 patients with UC who received tofacitinib treatment at 12 hospitals in Korea between January 2018 and November 2020. Clinical remission (i.e. complete improvement of symptoms) was achieved in 60.6% and 52.8% of patients at weeks 16 and 52, respectively. Endoscopic remission was achieved in 52.4% and 30.8% of patients at weeks 16 and 52, respectively. A higher baseline score of the UC endoscopic index of severity, which is one of the endoscopic indices that evaluate the severity of inflammation of the colon, was negatively associated with clinical response (i.e. partial improvement of symptoms). Adverse events (AEs) including herpes zoster and deep vein thrombosis occurred in 19 patients (12.8%) and serious AEs occurred in 12 patients (8.1%). Our real-life study shows that tofacitinib is a clinically effective treatment for Korean patients with UC, and the incidence of AEs was also similar to those observed in other real-world studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jungbok Lee
- Department of Biostatistics and Clinical
Epidemiology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Ju Oh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyung Hee
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Soo Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National
University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Soo-Young Na
- Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St.
Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea,
Incheon, Korea
| | - Sang-Bum Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of
Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea,
Daejeon, Korea
| | - Seong-Joon Koh
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver
Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Ki Bae Bang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook
University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Sung-Ae Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Hoon Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St.
Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea,
Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyeong Ok Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine,
Daegu, Korea
| | - Sang Hyoung Park
- Department of Gastroenterology and
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine,
Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk-Kyun Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology and
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine,
Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Hwan Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang
University College of Medicine, 102 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06973,
Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Straatmijer T, van Schaik FDM, Bodelier AGL, Visschedijk M, de Vries AC, Ponsioen CY, Pierik M, van Bodegraven AA, West RL, de Boer NKH, Srivastava N, Romkens TEH, Hoekstra J, Oldenburg B, Dijkstra G, van der Woude JC, Löwenberg M, Mujagic Z, Biemans VBC, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Duijvestein M. Effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis: two-year results of the ICC Registry. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 57:117-126. [PMID: 36282200 PMCID: PMC10092078 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor and is registered for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). The effectiveness of tofacitinib has been evaluated up to 12 months of treatment. AIM The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of 24 months of tofacitinib use in UC patients in the Netherlands. METHODS Patients initiating tofacitinib treatment were included in the ICC Registry, a nationwide, observational registry. Patients were prospectively evaluated for up to 24 months. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSFR, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] ≤2) at week 104. Secondary outcomes included biochemical remission (C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤5 mg/L and faecal calprotectin (FC) ≤250 μg/g), safety, and discontinuation rate. RESULTS We included 110 patients of whom 104 (94.5%) were anti-TNF experienced. After 104 weeks of tofacitinib, 31.8% (34/107) were in CSFR, 23.4% (25/107) in biochemical remission and 18.7% (20/107) in combined clinical and biochemical remission. Of the patients in CSFR at week 52, 76.5% (26/34) remained so after 104 weeks of treatment. Sixty-one patients (55.5%) discontinued tofacitinib after a median duration of 13 weeks (IQR 7-34). The main reasons for discontinuation were non-response (59%), loss of response (14.8%), and adverse events (18%). There were 33.9 possible tofacitinib-related adverse events per 100 patient-years during follow-up. Adverse events most probably related to tofacitinib were skin reactions and headaches. There were 6.4 herpes zoster infections per 100 patient-years. CONCLUSION Tofacitinib was effective in 31.8% of patients after 24 months of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Straatmijer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marijn Visschedijk
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cyriel Y Ponsioen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Pierik
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ad A van Bodegraven
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Bas Oldenburg
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Dijkstra
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark Löwenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zlatan Mujagic
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Straatmijer T, Biemans VBC, Visschedijk M, Hoentjen F, de Vries A, van Bodegraven AA, Bodelier A, de Boer NKH, Dijkstra G, Festen N, Horjus C, Jansen JM, Jharap B, Mares W, van Schaik FDM, Ponsioen C, Romkens T, Srivastava N, van der Voorn MMPJA, West R, van der Woude J, Wolvers MDJ, Pierik M, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Duijvestein M, van Workum M, de Jong D, van Dop W, van der Marel S, El Ghabzouri H, Talhaoui K, Oldenburg B, Boontje N, Fidder H, Hirdes M, Creemers RH, Hoekstra J, Smid J, Mujagic Z, François-Verweij M, Schakel- van den Berge T, Maljaars J, Theeuwen R, van den Berg D, Gerretsen S, Yocarini X, D’Haens G, Lowenberg M, Grootjans J, Gecse K, Bouma G, Waaijenberg P, Muskens B. Superior Effectiveness of Tofacitinib Compared to Vedolizumab in Anti-TNF-experienced Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Nationwide Dutch Registry Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:182-191.e2. [PMID: 35644343 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Clinicians face difficulty in when and in what order to position biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and tofacitinib in anti-TNF-exposed patients with UC in our prospective nationwide Initiative on Crohn and Colitis Registry. METHODS Patients with UC who failed anti-TNF treatment and initiated vedolizumab or tofacitinib treatment were identified in the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis Registry in the Netherlands. We selected patients with both clinical as well as biochemical or endoscopic disease activity at initiation of therapy. Patients previously treated with vedolizumab or tofacitinib were excluded. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index ≤2), biochemical remission (C-reactive protein ≤5 mg/L or fecal calprotectin ≤250 μg/g), and safety outcomes were compared after 52 weeks of treatment. Inverse propensity score-weighted comparison was used to adjust for confounding and selection bias. RESULTS Overall, 83 vedolizumab- and 65 tofacitinib-treated patients were included. Propensity score-weighted analysis showed that tofacitinib-treated patients were more likely to achieve corticosteroid-free clinical remission and biochemical remission at weeks 12, 24, and 52 compared with vedolizumab-treated patients (odds ratio [OR], 6.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.81-10.50; P < .01; OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.89-4.84; P < .01; and OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.15-2.99; P = .01; and OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.96-5.45; P < .01; OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.14-3.07; P = .01; and OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.06-3.09; P = .03, respectively). There was no difference in infection rate or severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Tofacitinib was associated with superior effectiveness outcomes compared with vedolizumab in anti-TNF-experienced patients with UC along with comparable safety outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Straatmijer
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marijn Visschedijk
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Adriaan A van Bodegraven
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal, and Intensive Care Medicine (COMIK), Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen-Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Dijkstra
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Noortje Festen
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Bindia Jharap
- Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Wout Mares
- Ziekenhuis Geldersche Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cyriel Ponsioen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Rachel West
- Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marije D J Wolvers
- Amsterdam UMC, department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Pierik
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marjolijn Duijvestein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Real-world evidence of tofacinitib in ulcerative colitis: short and long-term effectiveness and safety. Am J Gastroenterol 2022:00000434-990000000-00579. [PMID: 36716287 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To assess the durability, short and long-term effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical practice. METHODS Retrospective, multicentre study including UC patients who had received the first tofacitinib dose at least 8 weeks before the inclusion. Clinical effectiveness was based on Partial Mayo Score (PMS). RESULTS A total of 408 patients were included. Of them, 184 (45%) withdrew tofacitinib during follow-up (mean=18 months). The probability of maintaining tofacitinib was 67% at 6 m, 58% at 12 m, and 49% at 24 m. Main reason for tofacitinib withdrawal was primary non-response (44%). Older age at the start of tofacitinib and higher severity of clinical activity were associated with tofacitinib withdrawal. The proportion of patients in remission was 38% at week 4, 45% at week 8, and 47% at week 16. Having moderate-severe vs. mild disease activity at baseline and older age at tofacitinib start were associated with lower and higher likelihood of remission at week 8, respectively. Of 171 patients in remission at week 8, 83 (49%) relapsed. The probability of maintaining response was 66% at 6 m and 54% at 12 m. There were 93 adverse events related to tofacitinib treatment [including 2 pulmonary thromboembolisms (in patients with risk factors) and 2 peripheral vascular thrombosis], and 29 led to tofacitinib discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Tofacitinib is effective both in the short and in the long-term in patients with UC. The safety profile is similar to that previously reported.
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen SL, Faye AS, Chang S. Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in the Older Adult: a Review of Postoperative Outcomes and Pouchitis Treatment. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY 2022; 20:564-581. [PMID: 36844648 PMCID: PMC9957085 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-022-00405-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the preferred surgical treatment for patients with medically refractive ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous studies have suggested that outcomes of this procedure may be worse in older patients; however, more recent reports have suggested that IPAA in select patients is safe, feasible, and results in good quality of life. In this review, we discuss the recent literature surrounding clinical considerations and treatment management of IPAA in older adults. RECENT FINDINGS IPAA complication rates and adverse events are similar in the older adult population, as compared to the younger adult patient population. Although fecal urgency and incontinence may be more common among older adults, chronological age alone is not a contraindication for IPAA surgery, as good quality of life can still be achieved. In this review, we will also discuss the development of pouchitis after IPAA, particularly among older adults, as the emergence of newer biologic drugs has shifted the treatment landscape. SUMMARY IPAA can be a safe and effective treatment modality for older adults with UC, with high self-reported patient satisfaction. Patient optimization and careful case selection are vital to achieving these outcomes, and specialized preoperative assessments and counseling can help facilitate the proper treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina L. Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 305 East 33rd Street, NY 10016 New York, USA
| | - Adam S. Faye
- Department of Gastroenterology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 305 East 33rd Street, NY 10016 New York, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Department of Gastroenterology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 305 East 33rd Street, NY 10016 New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA is the procedure of choice when colectomy is needed for medically refractory ulcerative colitis. Pouchitis is one of the most common complications among patients who have undergone IPAA and represents a spectrum of disease varying in both phenotype and clinical course. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assist clinicians and surgeons in the treatment of both acute and chronic pouchitis, including newer therapies and future directions. DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT Diagnosis is made by endoscopy of the pouch with biopsy because other conditions may produce similar symptoms such as increased stool frequency, abdominal cramps, and urgency. Pouchitis is classified by duration (acute versus chronic), disease pattern (infrequent, relapsing, and continuous), and response to antibiotics (responsive, dependent, and refractory). The Pouchitis Disease Activity Index may be used to measure disease activity. The management of pouchitis is guided by the disease phenotype. Acute episodes are treated with an initial 2-week course of antibiotics (typically ciprofloxacin or metronidazole), although patients with relapsing or chronic pouchitis may require long-term antibiotic treatment or the cycling of different antibiotics. Certain probiotics may also be used for maintenance therapy in those with chronic symptoms. For patients with chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis, oral budesonide, immunosuppressive agents (azathioprine), or biologic therapy (infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab) may be required for both induction and maintenance with close monitoring for potential side effects. In rare cases, diverting ileostomy or pouch excision may be required. CONCLUSION Pouchitis represents a spectrum of disease phenotypes, ranging from acute antibiotic responsive pouchitis to chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis. The management of pouchitis is primarily directed by the disease phenotype.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kochar BD, Cheng D, Cai T, Ananthakrishnan AN. Comparative Risk of Thrombotic and Cardiovascular Events with Tofacitinib and Anti-TNF Agents in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:5206-5212. [PMID: 35113275 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07404-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been associated with increased risks for thromboembolic and cardiovascular events, but drug attributable risk is unknown. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a US claims database. We identified patients with IBD by International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes, stipulated 180 days of continuous enrollment prior to tofacitinib or anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) initiation to determine new users. Primary outcomes were ICD codes for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cardiovascular (CV) events. We constructed propensity score (PS)-weighted Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and time-to-event outcomes comparing tofacitinib and anti-TNF. We conducted a subgroup analysis of patients ≥ 50 years. RESULTS We identified 305 patients with IBD initiating tofacitinib and compared them with 19,096 initiating anti-TNFs. After weighting, balance was achieved across all demographic covariates. VTE occurred in 5% of patients treated with tofacitinib and 4% of anti-TNF users; in a PS-weighted cohort, tofacitinib did not confer a significantly elevated VTE risk compared with anti-TNF therapy (HR: 1.72, 95% CI: 0.74-3.01). A major CV event (MACE) occurred in 2% of tofacitinib users and 1% of anti-TNF users; tofacitinib also did not confer a significantly elevated risk for MACE (HR: 2.50, 95% CI: 0.37-6.18). Those with a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 2 had greater risks for thromboembolic and cardiovascular events. Similar findings were noted in patients ≥ 50 years. CONCLUSIONS In this large, active comparator, study, we demonstrate that tofacitinib was not associated with a higher risk of adverse thrombotic events compared with anti-TNFs in patients with IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharati D Kochar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Cheng
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tianxi Cai
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,, Boston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cohen NA, Steinberg JM, Silfen A, Traboulsi C, Rodriguez TG, Singer JM, Patel S, Cohen RD, Dalal SR, Sakuraba A, Pekow J, Micic D, Rubin DT. Endo-histologic Normalization Is Achievable with Tofacitinib and Is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 68:1464-1472. [PMID: 36242686 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07716-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent real-world effectiveness studies investigating tofacitinib have been encouraging. Questions remain regarding the long-term effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib, effect on endoscopic remission rates, histologic changes, and alterations in fecal calprotectin levels. METHODS This retrospective study includes consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who initiated tofacitinib therapy. We reviewed electronic medical records for demographic and clinical data, as well as all adverse events and hospitalizations. All patients receiving tofacitinib were included in the safety analysis and only patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) were included in the effectiveness analysis. RESULTS 119 patients with IBD (97 UC, 12 CD, and 10 pouchitis) seen at our center between 2014 and 2020 were included in this study. Median follow-up was 32 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 3-252). Clinical response and remission were observed in 70% and 21%, 59% and 33%, and 49%, and 37% at weeks 8, 24, and 52, respectively. Endo-histologic healing was achieved by 11%, 25%, and 37.5% of patients at weeks 8, 24, and 52, respectively. Histologic normalization occurred as early as 24 weeks in this cohort and was achieved by 26% of patients in endoscopic remission. Overall, there were 27 (25%) adverse events with 6 (5%) resulting in treatment discontinuation. There were 11 (10%) infections, none required treatment discontinuation. Ten (10.3%) patients underwent colectomy during the follow-up period. There were no cardiovascular adverse events in the cohort during follow-up. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the effectiveness and long-term safety of tofacitinib in patients with UC. Importantly, we show that the endpoint of endo-histologic healing is achievable with tofacitinib and can occur as early as week 8 of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel A Cohen
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Joshua M Steinberg
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Alexa Silfen
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Cindy Traboulsi
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Tina G Rodriguez
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Jorie M Singer
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Shivani Patel
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Russell D Cohen
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Sushila R Dalal
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Atsushi Sakuraba
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Joel Pekow
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Dejan Micic
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mishra S, Jena A, Kakadiya R, Sharma V, Ahuja V. Positioning of tofacitinib in treatment of ulcerative colitis: a global perspective. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:737-752. [PMID: 35875997 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2106216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tofacitinib has emerged as a useful drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). AREAS COVERED There is an unmet need for cost-effective, non-immunogenic drugs with a safe adverse effect profile to treat patients with ulcerative colitis. In the present review, we evaluate the available literature to inform the appropriate positioning of tofacitinib in the current drug landscape and identify subsets where its use should be done with caution. EXPERT OPINION Tofacitinib is helpful in the treatment of patients where the standard conventional or biological therapies have failed or were not tolerated. With lower costs of the generic drug than the biologicals (or biosimilars), it could be an important therapy in low- to middle-income countries. The risk of infections, especially Herpes Zoster and tuberculosis, needs to be addressed before initiation. Tofacitinib should be avoided in patients with venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Due to limited evidence, the use is not recommended in pregnancy, while it should be used with caution in elderly citizens. Future trials should look into the head-to-head comparison of tofacitinib with biologicals. The role of tofacitinib in acute severe colitis needs evaluation with comparative trials with current standards of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shubhra Mishra
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Anuraag Jena
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rinkalben Kakadiya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Vishal Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Vineet Ahuja
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Verstockt B, Volk V, Jaeckel C, Alsoud D, Sabino J, Nikolaus S, Outtier A, Krönke N, Feuerhake F, De Hertogh G, Rosenstiel P, Vermeire S, Schreiber S, Ferrante M, Aden K. Longitudinal monitoring of STAT3 phosphorylation and histologic outcome of tofacitinib therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 56:282-291. [PMID: 35484689 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is the first in class, pan-JAK inhibitor approved for ulcerative colitis (UC). Clinical efficacy has been shown, but long-term real-life endoscopic and histologic data are lacking. AIM To investigate the effects of tofacitinib in patients with refractory UC focussing on endoscopic, histologic and molecular outcomes, including STAT3 phosphorylation (pSTAT3) detection in the spatial context of mucosal inflammation METHODS: We prospectively monitored 59 highly refractory patients (96.7% anti-TNF exposure, 91.7% vedolizumab exposure) initiating tofacitinib at two IBD referral centres and assessed outcome at the end of induction and after 48 weeks of therapy. Endoscopic improvement was defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1, endoscopic and histologic remission as Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 and Nancy histologic score 0. Multiplex immunohistochemistry with multispectral imaging was used to assess pSTAT3. RESULTS Endoscopic improvement was achieved by 24.4% and 30.5% of patients at weeks 8 and 48, respectively. Endoscopic and histologic remission rates were 11.1%, 23.7 and 16.7%, 21.4%, respectively. Endoscopic improvement at week 8 was significantly associated with treatment continuation in the long-term (72.7% vs 20.6%, p = 0.003). Although we observed a gradual decrease of mucosal pSTAT3 levels in both remitters and non-remitters (p < 0.05), no association with treatment outcome could be demonstrated. However, lamina propria pSTAT3 was significantly associated with the Nancy Histologic index (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION Tofacitinib can induce and maintain endoscopic and histologic remission in up to one-quarter of highly refractory UC patients. Longitudinal monitoring of nuclear pSTAT3 in mucosal tissue compartments reflects distinctive on-target effects, independently of long-term treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Valery Volk
- Institute for Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Charlot Jaeckel
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Dahham Alsoud
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - João Sabino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Susanna Nikolaus
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - An Outtier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicole Krönke
- Institute for Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Gert De Hertogh
- Laboratory of Morphology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Philip Rosenstiel
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine I, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine I, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Konrad Aden
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine I, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sah J, Teeple A, Muser E, Gutierrez C, Dassopoulos T. Treatment persistence and maintenance dose titration among ulcerative colitis patients on biologics: a pooled study of three United States claim databases. Curr Med Res Opin 2022; 38:1093-1101. [PMID: 35475385 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2071041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This real-world study evaluated biologic treatment patterns in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS IQVIA PharMetrics, IBM MarketScan, and Optum Clinformatics were pooled to identify UC patients with ≥1 claim for UC and ≥1 claim for adalimumab (ADA), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), or vedolizumab (VDZ). The index date for each biologic was the first claim for that biologic. Patients could be included in >1 cohort if they switched biologics during the identification period. Continuous eligibility for medical/pharmacy benefits was required for 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the index date. Patients lacking claims for any biologic during baseline were categorized as bio-naïve; those with any biologic claim were categorized as bio-experienced. Persistence was defined as the proportion of patients that remained on the index biologic without a gap between claims of >28 days for ADA, >56 days for GOL, and >112 days for IFX and VDZ. Dose titration was assessed among patients with ≥2 maintenance doses during follow-up among ADA, GOL, and VDZ patients. RESULTS In total, 6,106 bio-naïve UC patients and 1,027 bio-experienced UC patients were identified. Patients treated with VDZ and IFX had the highest persistence followed by ADA and GOL patients for bio-naïve and bio-experienced, respectively. ADA patients had a numerically higher proportion of patients with 50% dose escalation, followed by VDZ and GOL; 50% dose reduction was observed in ≤1% patients. CONCLUSIONS In this descriptive study of UC patients without confounder adjustment, VDZ persistence was numerically highest followed by IFX, GOL, and ADA across both populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janvi Sah
- STATinMED Research, HEOR, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Erik Muser
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | | | - Themistocles Dassopoulos
- Baylor Scott & White Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Long MD, Afzali A, Fischer M, Hudesman D, Abdalla M, McCabe R, Cohen BL, Ungaro RC, Harlan W, Hanson J, Konijeti G, Polyak S, Ritter T, Salzberg B, Seminerio J, English E, Zhang X, Sharma PP, Herfarth HH. Tofacitinib Response in Ulcerative Colitis (TOUR): Early Response After Initiation of Tofacitinib Therapy in a Real-world Setting. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022; 29:570-578. [PMID: 35700276 PMCID: PMC10069660 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Using a novel electronic reporting tool, we aimed to prospectively describe the onset of tofacitinib efficacy during induction therapy in a real-world study. METHODS Patient-reported outcome data (PROs) including the simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI), PRO Measurement Identification Systems (PROMIS) measures, and adverse events were collected daily for the first 14 days and at day 28 and 56. Paired t tests and P for trend were utilized to compare changes in SCCAI over time. Bivariate analyses and logistic regression models were performed to describe response (SCCAI <5) and remission (SCCAI ≤2) by clinical factors. RESULTS Of all included patients (n = 96), 67% had failed ≥2 biologics, and 61.5% were on concomitant steroids. Starting at day 3, PROs showed significant and persistent decline of the mean SCCAI (-1.1, P < 000.1) including significantly lower SCCAI subscores for stool frequency (-0.3; P < .003), bleeding (-0.3; P < .0002) and urgency (-0.2; P < .001). Steroid-free remission at day 14, 28, and 56 was achieved in 25%, 30.2%, and 29.2% of patients, respectively. Neither prior biologics nor endoscopic severity were independently predictive of response or remission in multivariate models. Numeric improvements in all PROMIS measures (anxiety, depression, social satisfaction) were seen through day 56. Rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were low. CONCLUSIONS In this prospective real-world study, tofacitinib resulted in a rapid and persistent improvement in UC disease activity PROs. The safety findings were consistent with the established safety profile of tofacitinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Millie D Long
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Anita Afzali
- Ohio State University, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Monika Fischer
- Indiana University, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Maisa Abdalla
- University of Rochester, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Benjamin L Cohen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryan C Ungaro
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Will Harlan
- Digestive Health Partners, Ashville, NC, USA
| | - John Hanson
- Atrium Health Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | - Steven Polyak
- University of Iowa, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | | | - Jennifer Seminerio
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Emily English
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Xian Zhang
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Panaccione R, Abreu MT, Lazariciu I, Mundayat R, Lawendy N, Salese L, Woolcott JC, Sands BE, Chaparro M. Persistence of treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis who responded to tofacitinib therapy: data from the open-label, long-term extension study, OCTAVE open. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 55:1534-1544. [PMID: 35246988 PMCID: PMC9311428 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
SummaryBackgroundTofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC).AimThis post hoc analysis evaluated tofacitinib persistence in patients with UC in OCTAVE Open, an open‐label, long‐term extension study of patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily.MethodsKaplan‐Meier estimates for tofacitinib drug survival and reasons for discontinuations were evaluated. Baseline factors were analysed as predictors of persistence.ResultsThis analysis included 603 patients: 280 entered OCTAVE Open with a clinical response (164 in remission and 116 not in remission), 220 were delayed responders, 75 were retreatment responders and 35 were dose escalation responders, treated for up to 7 years in OCTAVE Open. Of these, 118 (42.1%) responders, 121 (55.0%) delayed responders, 40 (53.3%) retreatment responders and 17 (48.6%) dose escalation responders discontinued tofacitinib with a median time to discontinuation of 5.6, 4.5, 4.0 and 4.4 years, respectively. The estimated 2‐ and 5‐year drug survival rates in the responders (including patients in remission and not in remission) were 73.9% and 54.5%, respectively. Corresponding persistence values for delayed responders were 69.5% and 45.2%, for retreatment responders, 70.7% and 40.0%, and for dose escalation responders, 74.3% and 32.8%.ConclusionIn OCTAVE Open, a high proportion of patients maintained tofacitinib treatment, with the median survival by group ranging from 4.0 to 5.6 years although these analyses are post hoc and limited by sample size. Further research should focus on factors to enhance persistence with tofacitinib treatment in patients with UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Maria T. Abreu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Crohn’s and Colitis CenterUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiFloridaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bruce E. Sands
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of GastroenterologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - María Chaparro
- Gastroenterology Department of Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS‐IP)Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd)MadridSpain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wang W, Pekow J. Editorial: response to tofacitinib is associated with high rates of long-term treatment persistence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 55:1222-1223. [PMID: 35429025 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Panaccione et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16848
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenfei Wang
- IBD Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Joel Pekow
- IBD Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chiorean MV, Allegretti JR, Sharma PP, Chastek B, Salese L, Bell EJ, Peterson-Brandt J, Cappelleri JC, Guo X, Khan N. Real-world characteristics, treatment experiences and corticosteroid utilisation of patients treated with tofacitinib for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:177. [PMID: 35397501 PMCID: PMC8994921 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02215-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of UC. We aimed to describe the real-world treatment experience and corticosteroid utilisation of patients treated with tofacitinib in a US claims database. Methods Patients with a UC diagnosis who initiated tofacitinib, vedolizumab or tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment between May 2018 and July 2019 were identified from the Optum Research Database. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who initiated tofacitinib, vedolizumab or TNFi were described. Oral corticosteroid use prior to and following tofacitinib initiation was evaluated. Tofacitinib adherence (proportion of days covered) and continuation was assessed for 6 months following initiation. Analyses were descriptive and stratified by prior biologic use (naïve, 1 or ≥ 2; minimum of 12 months prior to tofacitinib initiation). Results Among patients initiating tofacitinib (N = 225), mean age was 45.6 (SD 16.5) years and 50.2% were female. Of these, 43 (19.1%) patients were biologic-naïve and 182 (80.9%) had prior biologic use (92 [40.9%], 1 prior biologic; 90 [40.0%], ≥ 2 prior biologics). Among patients with 1 prior biologic, 82.6% were previously treated with a TNFi. Among patients with ≥ 2 prior biologics, 54.4% were previously treated with vedolizumab and a TNFi, 16.7% with two TNFi and 28.9% with ≥ 3 prior biologics. In the 6 months prior to tofacitinib initiation, 65.8% of patients had received oral corticosteroids (74.4%, 60.9% and 66.7% for biologic-naïve, 1 and ≥ 2 prior biologics, respectively). The proportion of patients with ongoing oral corticosteroid use 3–6 months after tofacitinib initiation decreased to 13.3% (9.3%, 18.5% and 10.0% for biologic-naïve, 1 and ≥ 2 prior biologics, respectively), and 19.6% of patients discontinued oral corticosteroid use during the 6 months after tofacitinib initiation. Overall, tofacitinib adherence, as determined by the mean proportion of days covered during the 6-month follow-up, was 0.7 (median 0.8). During the 6-month follow-up, 84.9% of patients continued tofacitinib. Conclusions Among patients with UC initiating tofacitinib, the majority had prior biologic use. Tofacitinib adherence was high, discontinuation was low and oral corticosteroid utilisation decreased irrespective of prior biologic use. Further research with longer follow-up and a larger sample size is required. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02215-y.
Collapse
|
37
|
Lichtenstein L, Koslowsky B, Ben Ya’acov A, Avni-Biron I, Ovadia B, Ben-Bassat O, Naftali T, Kopylov U, Haberman Y, Eran HB, Eliakim R, Lahat-Zok A, Hirsch A, Zittan E, Maharshak N, Waterman M, Israeli E, Goren I, Ollech JE, Yanai H, Ungar B, Avidan B, Ben Hur D, Melamud B, Segol O, Shalem Z, Dotan I, Odes SH, Ben-Horin S, Snir Y, Milgrom Y, Broide E, Goldin E, Delgado S, Ron Y, Cohen NA, Maoz E, Zborovsky M, Odeh S, Abu Freha N, Shachar E, Chowers Y, Engel T, Reiss-Mintz H, Segal A, Zinger A, Bar-Gil Shitrit A. COVID-19 in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Israeli Experience. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10030376. [PMID: 35335008 PMCID: PMC8950285 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10030376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) affecting millions of people worldwide. IBD therapies, designed for continuous immune suppression, often render patients more susceptible to infections. The effect of the immune suppression on the risk of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is not fully determined yet. Objective: To describe COVID-19 characteristics and outcomes and to evaluate the association between IBD phenotypes, infection outcomes and immunomodulatory therapies. Methods: In this multi-center study, we prospectively followed IBD patients with proven COVID-19. De-identified data from medical charts were collected including age, gender, IBD type, IBD clinical activity, IBD treatments, comorbidities, symptoms and outcomes of COVID-19. A multivariable regression model was used to examine the effect of immunosuppressant drugs on the risk of infection by COVID-19 and the outcomes. Results: Of 144 IBD patients, 104 (72%) were CD and 40 (28%) were UC. Mean age was 32.2 ± 12.6 years. No mortalities were reported. In total, 94 patients (65.3%) received biologic therapy. Of them, 51 (54%) at escalated doses, 10 (11%) in combination with immunomodulators and 9 (10%) with concomitant corticosteroids. Disease location, behavior and activity did not correlate with the severity of COVID-19. Biologics as monotherapy or with immunomodulators or corticosteroids were not associated with more severe infection. On the contrary, patients receiving biologics had significantly milder infection course (p = 0.001) and were less likely to be hospitalized (p = 0.001). Treatment was postponed in 34.7% of patients until recovery from COVID-19, without consequent exacerbation. Conclusion: We did not witness aggravated COVID-19 outcomes in patients with IBD. Patients treated with biologics had a favorable outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lev Lichtenstein
- Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; (L.L.); (E.M.); (M.Z.)
| | - Benjamin Koslowsky
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; (B.K.); (A.B.Y.); (E.G.)
| | - Ami Ben Ya’acov
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; (B.K.); (A.B.Y.); (E.G.)
| | - Irit Avni-Biron
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; (I.A.-B.); (H.B.E.); (I.G.); (J.E.O.); (H.Y.); (I.D.); (Y.S.)
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
| | - Baruch Ovadia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel;
| | | | - Timna Naftali
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Yael Haberman
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Hagar Banai Eran
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; (I.A.-B.); (H.B.E.); (I.G.); (J.E.O.); (H.Y.); (I.D.); (Y.S.)
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
| | - Rami Eliakim
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Adi Lahat-Zok
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Ayal Hirsch
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eran Zittan
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Ha’emek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Afula, Israel;
- Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; (M.W.); (D.B.H.); (Y.C.)
| | - Nitsan Maharshak
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Matti Waterman
- Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; (M.W.); (D.B.H.); (Y.C.)
- Rambam Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eran Israeli
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel
| | - Idan Goren
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; (I.A.-B.); (H.B.E.); (I.G.); (J.E.O.); (H.Y.); (I.D.); (Y.S.)
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
| | - Jacob E. Ollech
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; (I.A.-B.); (H.B.E.); (I.G.); (J.E.O.); (H.Y.); (I.D.); (Y.S.)
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
| | - Henit Yanai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; (I.A.-B.); (H.B.E.); (I.G.); (J.E.O.); (H.Y.); (I.D.); (Y.S.)
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
| | - Bella Ungar
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Benjamin Avidan
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Dana Ben Hur
- Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; (M.W.); (D.B.H.); (Y.C.)
- Rambam Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Bernardo Melamud
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel
| | - Ori Segol
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel;
| | - Zippora Shalem
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Institute, Shamir Medical Center, Be’er Ya’akov, Israel
| | - Iris Dotan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; (I.A.-B.); (H.B.E.); (I.G.); (J.E.O.); (H.Y.); (I.D.); (Y.S.)
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
| | - Selwyn H. Odes
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Mayanei HaYeshua Medical Center, Bnei Brak, Israel
| | - Shomron Ben-Horin
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Yf’at Snir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; (I.A.-B.); (H.B.E.); (I.G.); (J.E.O.); (H.Y.); (I.D.); (Y.S.)
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
| | - Yael Milgrom
- Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; (Y.M.); (A.Z.)
| | - Efrat Broide
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Institute, Shamir Medical Center, Be’er Ya’akov, Israel
| | - Eran Goldin
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; (B.K.); (A.B.Y.); (E.G.)
| | - Shmuel Delgado
- Assuta Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University, Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel;
| | - Yulia Ron
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nathaniel Aviv Cohen
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eran Maoz
- Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; (L.L.); (E.M.); (M.Z.)
| | - Maya Zborovsky
- Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; (L.L.); (E.M.); (M.Z.)
| | | | - Naim Abu Freha
- Soroka Medical Center, Be’er Sheva, Israel; (N.A.F.); (A.S.)
| | - Eyal Shachar
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Yehuda Chowers
- Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; (M.W.); (D.B.H.); (Y.C.)
- Rambam Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tal Engel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Hila Reiss-Mintz
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; (T.N.); (U.K.); (Y.H.); (R.E.); (A.L.-Z.); (A.H.); (N.M.); (E.I.); (B.U.); (B.A.); (B.M.); (Z.S.); (S.H.O.); (S.B.-H.); (E.B.); (Y.R.); (N.A.C.); (E.S.); (T.E.); (H.R.-M.)
- Mayanei HaYeshua Medical Center, Bnei Brak, Israel
| | - Arie Segal
- Soroka Medical Center, Be’er Sheva, Israel; (N.A.F.); (A.S.)
| | - Adar Zinger
- Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; (Y.M.); (A.Z.)
| | - Ariella Bar-Gil Shitrit
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; (B.K.); (A.B.Y.); (E.G.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis: Done is better than perfect. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:151-153. [PMID: 34953762 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
39
|
Macaluso FS, Maida M, Ventimiglia M, Orlando A. Effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A single-arm meta-analysis of observational studies. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:183-191. [PMID: 34011482 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several observational studies on Tofacitinib (TOFA) in ulcerative colitis (UC) have been published over the last 2 years. AIMS To estimate effectiveness and safety of TOFA arising from real-world experience. METHODS PubMed Central/Medline and Embase were systematically searched for real-world observational studies on TOFA for the treatment of UC through November 2020. RESULTS Seven studies comprising 759 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate rates were 49% for clinical response, 40% for clinical remission, and 34% for corticosteroid-free clinical remission at induction, while the rates of endoscopic response and endoscopic remission were 37% and 19%, respectively. At maintenance, the pooled estimate rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission were 36%, 35%, and 24%, respectively. The pooled estimate of incidence rate of adverse events was 53.0 per 100 person-years (PY), while the pooled estimate of incidence rate of withdrawal of TOFA due to adverse events was 9.3 per 100 PY, with a pooled rate of infections of 17.6 per 100 PY. CONCLUSIONS Cumulative analysis of data from real-world studies confirmed the good efficacy of TOFA in UC shown by randomized controlled trials for both induction and maintenance, while the safety profile was consistent with previous reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcello Maida
- Section of Gastroenterology, "S.Elia-Raimondi" Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy
| | - Marco Ventimiglia
- IBD Unit, "Villa Sofia-Cervello" Hospital, Via Trabucco 180, Palermo 90146, Italy
| | - Ambrogio Orlando
- IBD Unit, "Villa Sofia-Cervello" Hospital, Via Trabucco 180, Palermo 90146, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Avni-Biron I, Bar-Gil Shitrit A, Koslowsky B, Levartovsky A, Kopylov U, Weisshof R, Aviv Cohen N, Maharshak N, Hovel D, Israeli E, Naftali T, Goren I, Snir Y, Ollech JE, Banai-Eran H, Broitman Y, Sharar-Fischler T, Dotan I, Yanai H. Short-term effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis - real world data from tertiary medical centers in Israel. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:192-197. [PMID: 34887214 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to define the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in a real-world (RW) cohort of Israeli patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS This was a multi-center retrospective observational cohort study (2019-2020) to assess the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib induction and maintenance therapy up to 26 weeks. Clinical response and remission were defined as a reduction in Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) or partial Mayo score (PMS) of ≥3 points, and SCCAI ≤2 or a PMS ≤1, respectively. RESULTS We included 73 patients, 47% male; median age 26 years [IQR: 19.5-39.5], disease duration 7 years [IQR: 2.5-14.5], follow-up 7.1 months [IQR: 3-12], 91% biologics-experienced, and 74% ≥ 2-biologics. Half of patients used concomitant corticosteroids (CS). Overall, 56.1% discontinued therapy due to either lack of response and/or adverse events (AEs), median time to discontinuation - 9.7 months [IQR 3.4-16]. Overall, response, remission, and CS-free-remission were achieved in 47.6%, 20.6%, and 17.5% of patients, respectively. At early maintenance (week 26), response, remission, and CS-free-remission were achieved in 65%, 22.5%, and 20% of patients, respectively. At week 26, tofacitinib 10 mg BID was still used in 43%. Seventeen patients (23.2%) had an adverse event including herpes zoster- 2.7%, hospitalization- 12.3%, and colectomy- 2.7%. CONCLUSIONS Tofacitinib was effective in achieving CS-free-remission in about 1/5 of highly biologics -experienced patients with UC. Despite a considerable proportion of patients maintained on tofacitinib 10 mg bid, it was well tolerated and safe. Earlier positioning of tofacitinib in the therapeutic algorithm may result in improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irit Avni-Biron
- IBD Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Ariella Bar-Gil Shitrit
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Benjamin Koslowsky
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Asaf Levartovsky
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Roni Weisshof
- Gastroenterology Institute Rambam Health Care Campus, Israel; Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | - Nathaniel Aviv Cohen
- IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nitsan Maharshak
- IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - David Hovel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eran Israeli
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Timna Naftali
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Meir Medical Center, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Idan Goren
- IBD Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yfat Snir
- IBD Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jacob E Ollech
- IBD Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hagar Banai-Eran
- IBD Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yelena Broitman
- IBD Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tali Sharar-Fischler
- IBD Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Iris Dotan
- IBD Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Henit Yanai
- IBD Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hernández Martínez A, Navajas Hernández P, Martín Rodríguez MDM, Lázaro Sáez M, Olmedo Martín R, Núñez Ortiz A, Argüelles Arias F, Fernández Cano MDC, Gallardo Sánchez F, Marín Pedrosa S, González García J, Vázquez Morón JM. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: real-life experience in Andalusia. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2022; 114:516-521. [PMID: 35000397 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8380/2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). In the present study we aimed to evaluate its efficacy in a real-life setting. METHODS Retrospective and multicenter observational study including UC patients treated with tofacitinib. Short and long-term treatment effectiveness, treatment survival, need for dose escalation and safety are analyzed. Clinical response and remission were defined in accordance with the partial Mayo score. RESULTS Seventy-four patients were included, 98.3% of whom had received prior biological treatment: 55.4% with 3 or more biologicals and up to 64.9% with 2 or 3 different mechanisms of action. Clinical remission and response rates were 37.8% and 77% at 8 weeks, and 41.8% and 70.1% at 16 weeks. Of non-responders at 8 weeks, 37,5% achieved a delayed clinical response at 16 weeks. Mean treatment duration was 19 months (95% CI: 16-22), with a treatment survival of 56% at 28 months, and remission and response rates at 24 months of 53.8% and 61.5%. Twenty-three treatments were withdrawn, most of them (18) during the induction period. There were adverse events in a quarter of the patients; only 4 were severe and led to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION Tofacitinib demonstrates in clinical practice its efficacy to induce and maintain clinical response in treatment-refractory UC patients, with an acceptable safety profile.
Collapse
|
42
|
Taxonera C, Olivares D, Alba C. Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022; 28:32-40. [PMID: 33586766 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izab011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge of the real-world effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis (UC) is relevant to confirm the benefit observed in clinical trials. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the real-world effectiveness of tofacitinib for moderate to severely active UC. The primary outcome was clinical remission evaluated at week 8, weeks 12 to 16, and month 6. Secondary outcomes were response, corticosteroid-free remission, mucosal healing, colectomy, and safety. RESULTS Seventeen studies with a total of 1162 patients with UC were included. Remission (11 studies) was achieved in 34.7% of patients at week 8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.4%-45.1%), 47% at weeks 12 to 16 (95% CI, 40.3%-53.6%), and 38.3% at month 6 (95% CI, 29.2%-47.5%) at month 6 duplicated. Response was achieved in 62.1%, 64.2%, 50.8%, and 41.8% of patients at week 8, weeks 12 to 16, month 6, and month 12, respectively. Corticosteroid-free remission (5 studies) was achieved in 38.4%, 44.3%, 33.6%, and 31% of patients at week 8, weeks 12 to 16, month 6, and month 12, respectively. Mucosal healing was achieved in 48.3% and 45.3% of patients at week 8 and weeks 12 to 16, respectively. Patients who were biologic-naïve (11.6%) had a significantly higher rate of response at week 8 (1.38; 95% CI, 1.03-1.84). The incidence rates of serious adverse events and herpes zoster was 8.9 and 6.9 per 100 patient-years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis of real-world studies confirms the effectiveness of tofacitinib in a highly refractory population of patients with moderate to severely active UC. Tofacitinib showed an acceptable safety profile. These findings were consistent with clinical trials and further support the use of tofacitinib in UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Taxonera
- From the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos and Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Olivares
- From the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos and Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Alba
- From the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos and Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Shen B, Kochhar GS, Rubin DT, Kane SV, Navaneethan U, Bernstein CN, Cross RK, Sugita A, Schairer J, Kiran RP, Fleshner P, McCormick JT, D'Hoore A, Shah SA, Farraye FA, Kariv R, Liu X, Rosh J, Chang S, Scherl E, Schwartz DA, Kotze PG, Bruining DH, Philpott J, Abraham B, Segal J, Sedano R, Kayal M, Bentley-Hibbert S, Tarabar D, El-Hachem S, Sehgal P, Picoraro JA, Vermeire S, Sandborn WJ, Silverberg MS, Pardi DS. Treatment of pouchitis, Crohn's disease, cuffitis, and other inflammatory disorders of the pouch: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:69-95. [PMID: 34774224 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00214-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Pouchitis, Crohn's disease of the pouch, cuffitis, polyps, and extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease are common inflammatory disorders of the ileal pouch. Acute pouchitis is treated with oral antibiotics and chronic pouchitis often requires anti-inflammatory therapy, including the use of biologics. Aetiological factors for secondary pouchitis should be evaluated and managed accordingly. Crohn's disease of the pouch is usually treated with biologics and its stricturing and fistulising complications can be treated with endoscopy or surgery. The underlying cause of cuffitis determines treatment strategies. Endoscopic polypectomy is recommended for large, symptomatic inflammatory polyps and polyps in the cuff. The management principles of extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with pouches are similar to those in patients without pouches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Shen
- Center for Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Gursimran S Kochhar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Udayakumar Navaneethan
- Center for IBD and Interventional IBD Unit, Digestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Charles N Bernstein
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, MD, USA
| | - Akira Sugita
- Department of Clinical Research and Department of inflammatory Bowel Disease, Yokohama Municipal Citizens Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Jason Schairer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ravi P Kiran
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip Fleshner
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of California-Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James T McCormick
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - André D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Samir A Shah
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Miriam Hospital, Gastroenterology Associates, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Revital Kariv
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Xiuli Liu
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, USA
| | - Joel Rosh
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Goryeb Children's Hospital/Atlantic Health, Morristown, NJ, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ellen Scherl
- Jill Roberts Center for IBD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork Presbytarian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - David A Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - David H Bruining
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jessica Philpott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bincy Abraham
- Houston Methodist and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Rocio Sedano
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Maia Kayal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stuart Bentley-Hibbert
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dino Tarabar
- IBD Clinical Center, University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Sandra El-Hachem
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Priya Sehgal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph A Picoraro
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - William J Sandborn
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Darrell S Pardi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ishida N, Miyazu T, Tamura S, Tani S, Yamade M, Iwaizumi M, Hamaya Y, Osawa S, Furuta T, Sugimoto K. Real-World Efficacy and Safety Monitoring for Predicting Continuation of Tofacitinib Therapy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:3984-3992. [PMID: 34460029 PMCID: PMC8403693 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07233-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the clinical efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) has been assessed in the OCTAVE trial, there is a lack of adequate data on its efficacy in real-world clinical settings. AIMS To analyze the efficacy of tofacitinib and the predictors of its continuation. METHODS Changes in clinical activity index (CAI), blood test results (C-reactive protein [CRP], albumin [Alb], and hemoglobin), and endoscopic scores (Mayo endoscopic subscore [MES], ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity [UCEIS]) were evaluated, and we investigated the factors that affect the rate and continuity of tofacitinib. RESULTS Twenty-two patients with UC who were treated with tofacitinib were enrolled. Tofacitinib was continued in 16/22 (72.7%) patients. CAI significantly improved 4 weeks after tofacitinib induction (P < 0.01). In the blood tests, only Alb level improved significantly at week 2 compared with baseline (P = 0.03). In the non-failure group, serum Alb and CRP levels improved significantly from week 0 to week 24; however, similar changes were not observed in the failure group. After 6 months, the overall MES and UCEIS had significantly improved (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that those with baseline UCEIS ≥ 5 had significantly lower tofacitinib continuation rate than those with baseline UCEIS ≤ 4, suggesting that baseline UCEIS may be a predictor of tofacitinib continuation (log-rank test: P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Tofacitinib is a promising therapeutic agent for the induction and maintenance therapy in UC. Baseline UCEIS may predict its therapeutic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natsuki Ishida
- First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192 Japan
| | - Takahiro Miyazu
- First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192 Japan
| | - Satoshi Tamura
- First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192 Japan
| | - Shinya Tani
- First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192 Japan
| | - Mihoko Yamade
- First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192 Japan
| | - Moriya Iwaizumi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Japan
| | - Yasushi Hamaya
- First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192 Japan
| | - Satoshi Osawa
- Department of Endoscopic and Photodynamic Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Japan
| | - Takahisa Furuta
- Center for Clinical Research, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Japan
| | - Ken Sugimoto
- First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sedano R, Ma C, Jairath V, Feagan BG. Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Management of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2022; 18:14-27. [PMID: 35505771 PMCID: PMC9053496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, knowledge about the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has led to the development of novel therapies and biologics with differing mechanisms of action. A major innovation has been the development of small molecules. Tofacitinib was the first pan-Janus kinase (Jak) inhibitor approved for the treatment of IBD, targeting the 4 isoforms of cytokine-associated Jaks (Jak1, Jak2, Jak3, and tyrosine-protein kinase 2). Compared with biologic agents, novel small molecules have a short half-life, a rapid onset of action, and no immunogenicity, but they are associated with a potentially increased risk of off-target side effects. These differences in properties between biologic and oral small molecule therapies may be important when considering their relative treatment positioning and role in clinical practice. Although tofacitinib has been demonstrated to be highly effective as both first- and second-line therapy for ulcerative colitis, concerns about safety, including the risk of infection, venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, and malignancy, have dampened enthusiasm for its widespread use. Subsequently, several Jak inhibitors with more selective profiles, and potentially improved safety while maintaining treatment efficacy, are currently in late-stage clinical trials for use in patients with IBD. This article summarizes the current data regarding the use, safety, and efficacy of Jak inhibitors in patients with IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocio Sedano
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Alimentiv, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher Ma
- Alimentiv, London, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Alimentiv, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian G. Feagan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Alimentiv, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lucaciu LA, Constantine-Cooke N, Plevris N, Siakavellas S, Derikx LA, Jones GR, Lees CW. Real-world experience with tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14:17562848211064004. [PMID: 34987608 PMCID: PMC8721385 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211064004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) recently approved for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) based on robust efficacy and safety data derived from OCTAVE clinical trials. Evidence on the outcomes of tofacitinib therapy in real-world UC patients is needed, as a number of these patients would be deemed ineligible for clinical trials. We have therefore summarised data derived from observational, real-world evidence (RWE) studies on the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in moderate to severe UC patients. METHODS We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for observational studies on the use of tofacitinib in UC patients, published between 30 May 2018 and 24 January 2021. Pooled induction (8-14 weeks) and maintenance (16-26 weeks) clinical response and remission rates were calculated, as well as the proportion of reported adverse events using random effects models. RESULTS Nine studies were included, comprising 830 patients, of which 81% were previously treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and 57% with vedolizumab. Induction of clinical response and remission were achieved in 51% (95% confidence interval, 41-60%) and 37% (26-45%) of patients, after a median follow-up of 8 weeks. At the end of a median follow-up of 24 weeks, maintenance of clinical response and remission were met in 40% (31-50%) and 29% (23-36%) of patients, respectively. Thirty-two percent of the patients had at least one adverse event, the most commonly reported being mild infection (13%) and worsening of UC, requiring colectomy (13%). A third of the patients (35%) discontinued tofacitinib, most frequently due to primary non-response (51%). CONCLUSION Tofacitinib is a safe and effective therapy in real-world UC patients, as previously reported by clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A. Lucaciu
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Nathan Constantine-Cooke
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Lauranne A.A.P. Derikx
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gareth-Rhys Jones
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Charles W. Lees
- Centre for Genomics and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Garrido I, Lopes S, Macedo G. Hit the Road JAK! The Role of New Oral Treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021; 27:2010-2022. [PMID: 33742651 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izab037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are considered chronic disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, lifelong medication often being necessary. Furthermore, they have significant implications on the quality of life. In the past few years, major advances have been achieved concerning the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. These advances are expanding the possibilities for managing these patients. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors represent the most auspicious treatment to date because they consist of drugs that are orally administered, with a short half-life and low antigenicity. In addition, they seem to concurrently lessen various proinflammatory routes. In fact, tofacitinib has already been approved in patients with UC, both naïve and with prior exposure to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. In CD, the results with tofacitinib have been less impressive. Several other JAK inhibitors are currently being investigated. However, given the wide spectrum of immunosuppressive effects, special attention has been given to the safety profile of these drugs, namely with regard to the occurrence of thromboembolic events, opportunistic infections, and malignancy. In this article, we review key evidence on the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors concerning both UC and CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Garrido
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.,World Gastroenterology Organization Porto Training Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Susana Lopes
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.,World Gastroenterology Organization Porto Training Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.,World Gastroenterology Organization Porto Training Center, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wiles CA, Shah NB, Bell J, Pabla BS, Scoville EA, Dalal RL, Beaulieu DB, Schwartz DA, Horst SN. Tofacitinib Adherence and Outcomes in Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2021; 3:otab075. [PMID: 36777280 PMCID: PMC9802481 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otab075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tofacitinib has been approved for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis and studied in Crohn's disease. Understanding medication adherence to oral medications in severe disease is essential. Methods We retrospectively reviewed adherence and real-world outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease patients who initiated tofacitinib at a single care center. Adherence was measured by proportion of days covered. Results Sixty-three patients were identified. All patients failed at least one prior biologic therapy. Mean proportion of days covered was 95.7% for ulcerative colitis and 93.1% for Crohn's disease. Significant clinical and endoscopic response was seen. Conclusion Adherence was high in a cohort with highly refractory disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Alex Wiles
- Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nisha B Shah
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jake Bell
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Baldeep S Pabla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Scoville
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robin L Dalal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Dawn B Beaulieu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - David A Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sara N Horst
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA,Address correspondence to: Sara N. Horst, MD, MPH, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37232, USA ()
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
The Era of Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms222111322. [PMID: 34768752 PMCID: PMC8582842 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
For a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), primary non-response and secondary loss of response to treatment remain significant issues. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have been licensed for use in IBD. Other disease-related pathways have been targeted as well, including the interleukin 12/23 axis and lymphocyte tracking. However, the need for parenteral administration and the associated costs of dispensing and monitoring all biologics remain a burden on healthcare systems and patients. Janus kinase inhibitors are small-molecule drugs that can be administered orally and are relatively inexpensive, thus offering an additional option for treating IBD. They have been shown to be effective in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), but they are less effective in those with Crohn’s disease (CD). Nonetheless, given the immune-system-based mechanism of these drugs, their safety profile remains a cause for concern. This article provides an overview of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and new trends in the treatment of IBD.
Collapse
|
50
|
Straatmijer T, van Gennep S, Duijvestein M, Ponsioen CIJ, Gecse KB, D'Haens GR, Löwenberg M. Real-world clinical and endoscopic outcomes after one year tofacitinib treatment in ulcerative colitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33:1288-1297. [PMID: 33405424 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated clinical and endoscopic efficacy, safety and drug survival of tofacitinib up to one year in a real-world cohort. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, 36 UC patients were included who received tofacitinib. The primary outcome was combined with steroid-free clinical remission [Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) ≤2] and endoscopic improvement (Mayo score ≤1) at 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included clinical (SCCAI drop ≥3) and endoscopic response (Mayo score drop ≥1), biochemical remission [fecal calprotectin (FC) ≤150 mg/kg and C-reactive protein ≤5 mg/L), safety and drug survival. RESULTS Median disease duration was 7 (3-14) years and 89 and 42% of patients failed prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and vedolizumab treatment, respectively. Combined corticosteroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic improvement were observed in 8/36 patients (22%), 6/35 (17%) and 12/31 (39%), at 16, 36 and 52 weeks, respectively. Corresponding combined clinical and endoscopic response rates were 15/36 (42%), 12/35 (34%), 15/31 (48%) and biochemical remission rates were 11/33 (33%), 10/32 (31%) and 10/29 (34%). Nine infections (two herpes zoster) led to dose reduction or (temporary) drug withdrawal. Permanent withdrawal occurred in 14/36 patients (33%) after a median duration of 9 (5-30) weeks. Drug survival at 1 year was 60%. Patients that failed anti-TNF were less likely to discontinue tofacitinib treatment early compared to patients without prior anti-TNF use (hazard ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.65). CONCLUSION In a refractory UC population, combined steroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic improvement were found in 39% of patients at 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Straatmijer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|