The association between calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P and headache in pituitary tumours

The role of calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P in the pathogenesis of dialysis headache

AIM

The present study aims to establish the role of serum CGRP and SP levels in the disease pathophysiology in patients with dialysis headache not accompanied by primary or secondary headaches, and also whether there is a correlation between these vasoactive peptides and the severity of headache.

METHOD

This study was designed as prospective and multicenter. A total of 30 dialysis headache patients and 30 patients without headache as the control group in the Nephrology outpatient clinics which implement similar dialysis procedures were included in the study. Blood samples were taken from all the patients before hemodialysis, and post-hemodialysis samples were collected. CGRP and SP contents in serum samples were measured using the ELISA method with detection kits.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were included in the study with 17 female and 13 male patients in the dialysis headache group and 18 female and 12 male patients in the control group, and there were no significant differences in sex and age between the groups. CGRP levels in the headache group were found to be significantly higher compared with the control group both before and after hemodialysis. Furthermore, pre-hemodialysis CGRP levels were significantly higher than post-hemodialysis CGRP levels in both the headache and control groups. Serum SP levels in the headache group were found to be higher compared with the control group both before and after hemodialysis, there was no significant difference between the groups. Even though SP levels in both groups decreased after hemodialysis, there was again no significant difference between the groups. No correlation was found between the patients' severity of headache and serum CGRP and SP levels.

CONCLUSION

This study concludes that CGRP and SP, even though the latter is not statistically significant, play a role in the pathophysiology of the dialysis headache, and further studies with a larger and more specific patient population may reveal the relationship between the neuropeptides and dialysis headache more clearly.

Substance P and Neurokinin 1 Receptor in Chronic Inflammation and Cancer of the Head and Neck: A Review of the Literature

Head and neck cancer is a growing worldwide public health problem, accounting for approximately 1,500,000 new cases and 500,000 deaths annually. Substance P (SP) is a peptide of the tachykinin family, which has roles related to a large number of physiological mechanisms in humans. The implications of SP in carcinogenesis have recently been reported through the stimulation of the neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R), or directly, through the effects derived from the constitutive activation of NK1R. Consequently, SP/NK1R seems to play relevant roles in cancer, upregulating cell proliferation, cell migration and chronic inflammation, among other oncogenic actions. Furthermore, there is growing evidence pointing to a central role for SP in tumour progression, singularly so in laryngeal and oral squamous cell carcinomas. The current narrative review of the literature focuses on the relationship between the SP/NK1R system and chronic inflammation and cancer in the head-and-neck region. We described a role for SP/NK1R in the transition from chronic inflammation of the head and neck mucosa, to preneoplastic and neoplastic transformation and progression.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide: A promising bridge between cancer development and cancer-associated pain in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Nerves have been widely demonstrated to exert major effects in tumor-associated microenvironments. Due to the characteristic innervation of the oral cavity and the fact that cancer-associated pain is a distinct feature of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), the sensory nerves may dominate in the OSCC-nerve microenvironment. As the most abundant neuropeptide in the trigeminal ganglion, the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) exerts a dual effect on cancer development and cancer-associated pain in various types of cancer. The present review explored the potential molecular mechanisms of the roles of CGRP in cancer development and cancer-associated pain, suggesting that CGRP may be a promising therapeutic target for OSCC.

Pre- and postoperative headache in patients with meningioma

Background

Meningiomas are generally slowly growing intracranial tumors. They are often incidentally diagnosed, given that symptoms may be absent even in cases of an enormous tumor size. Headache is a frequent but not consistent symptom. Therefore, we examined the association between structural, biochemical and histochemical tumor parameters with preoperative as well as postoperative occurrence of headache.

Methods

In our study, we prospectively investigated 69 consecutive patients enrolled for meningioma neurosurgery. Anatomical, histological and biochemical parameters were acquired, and headache parameters were registered from the clinical report and from a questionnaire filled by the patients before neurosurgery. The headache was re-evaluated one year after neurosurgery. The study was designed to exploratively investigate whether there is an association of acquired clinical and biological parameters with the occurrence of preoperative and postoperative headache.

Results

Edema diameter and the proliferation marker MIB-1 were negatively associated with the incidence and intensity of preoperative headache, while the content of prostaglandin E2 in the tumor tissue was positively associated with preoperative headache intensity. Headache was more prevalent when the meningioma was located in the area supplied by the ophthalmic trigeminal branch. Compared to preoperative headache levels, an overall reduction was observed one year postoperative, and patients with a larger tumor had a higher headache remission. In parietal and occipital meningiomas and in those with a larger edema, the percentage of the headache remission rate was higher compared to other locations or smaller edema. Multivariable analyses showed an involvement of substance P and prostaglandin E2 in preoperative headache.

Conclusions

The study demonstrates new associations between meningiomas and headache. The postoperative headache outcome in the presented patient sample is encouraging for the performed neurosurgical intervention. These results should be tested in a prospective study that incorporates all patients with meningiomas.

Clinical Presentation and Management of Headache in Pituitary Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides an overview of headache in the setting of pituitary adenoma. The purpose of this article is to educate providers on the association, possible pathophysiology, and the clinical presentation of headache in pituitary tumor.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent prospective evaluations indicate that risk factors for development of headache in the setting of pituitary adenoma include highly proliferative tumors, cavernous sinus invasion, and personal or family history of headache. Migraine-like headaches are the predominant presentation. Unilateral headaches are often ipsilateral to the side of cavernous sinus invasion. In summary, this paper describes how the size and type of pituitary tumors play an important role in causation of headaches. Pituitary adenoma-associated headache can also mimic primary headache disorders making recognition of a secondary process difficult. Therefore, this paper highlights the association of between trigeminal autonomic cephalgias and pituitary adenomas and urges practitioners to maintain a high index of suspicion when evaluating patients with these uncommon headache presentations. However, on balance, given the prevalence of both primary headache disorders and pituitary adenomas, determining causality can be challenging. A thoughtful and multidisciplinary approach is often the best management strategy, and treatment may require the expertise of multiple specialties including neurology, neurosurgery, and endocrinology.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for headache associated with non-functioning pituitary adenomas

Background Headaches associated with pituitary adenoma have been reported to be related to the structural characteristics and endocrine factors of the tumour itself. Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of, and the risk factors for, non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA)-associated headaches in Chinese patients with normal endocrine activity. Methods Ninety-seven patients with a NFPA with normal endocrine laboratory results were prospectively enrolled in this study. The relevant clinical demographic data were collected and examined with the appropriate statistical methods. Results The pre-operative prevalence of tumour-associated headaches was 48.5%; 87.2% of these patients had migraine-like headaches. A family history of primary headache (odds ratio (OR) 3.67; p = 0.032) and a higher tumour Knosp grade (OR 1.83; p = 0.001) were identified as risk factors for the occurrence of NFPA-associated headaches. The patient's age, sex, visual disturbances, optic chiasm compression, tumour size and tumour volume were not significantly associated with NFPA-associated headaches ( p > 0.05). In addition, headache severity was significantly correlated with the Knosp grade ( r = 0.339; p = 0.001). The sides of the headaches and of cavernous sinus invasion were significantly concordant (48.9% agreement; κ = 0.257; p = 0.007). Conclusions Migraine-like headaches are a common clinical manifestation in patients with NFPAs. A family history of primary headaches and cavernous sinus invasion are risk factors for NFPA-associated headaches.

Chronic cluster headache and the pituitary gland

BACKGROUND

Cluster headache is classified as a primary headache by definition not caused by an underlying pathology. However, symptomatic cases of otherwise typical cluster headache have been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 47-year-old male suffered from primary chronic cluster headache (CCH, ICHD-3 beta criteria fulfilled) since the age of 35 years. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of the brain in 2006 came back normal. He tried several prophylactic treatments but was never longer than 1 month without attacks. He was under chronic treatment with verapamil with only a limited effect on the attack frequency. Subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg injections were very effective in aborting attacks. By February 2014 the patient developed a continuous interictal pain ipsilateral to the right-sided cluster headache attacks. An indomethacin test (up to 225 mg/day orally) was negative. Because of the change in headache pattern we performed a new brain MRI, which showed a cystic structure in the pituitary gland. The differential diagnosis was between a Rathke cleft cyst and a cystic adenoma. Pituitary function tests showed an elevated serum prolactin level. A dopamine agonist (cabergoline) was started and the headache subsided completely. Potential pathophysiological mechanisms of pituitary tumor-associated headache are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Neuroimaging should be considered in all patients with CCH, especially those with an atypical presentation or evolution. Response to acute treatment does not exclude a secondary form of cluster headache. There may be shared pathophysiological mechanisms of primary and secondary cluster headache.

Quantitative evaluation of headache severity before and after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma

OBJECT The relationship between headaches, pituitary adenomas, and surgical treatment of pituitary adenomas remains unclear. The authors assessed the severity and predictors of self-reported headaches in patients referred for surgery of pituitary adenomas and evaluated the impact of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery on headache severity and quality of life (QOL). METHODS In this prospective study, 79 patients with pituitary adenomas underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal resection and completed the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) QOL questionnaire preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS Preoperatively, 49.4% of patients had mild headache severity, 13.9% had moderate severity, 13.9% had substantial severity, and 22.8% had intense severity. Younger age and hormone-producing tumors predisposed greater headache severity, while tumor volume, suprasellar extension, chiasmal compression, and cavernous sinus invasion of the pituitary tumors did not. Preoperative headache severity was found to be significantly associated with reduced scores across all SF-36 QOL dimensions and most significantly associated with mental health. By 6 months postoperatively, headache severity was reduced in a significant proportion of patients. Of the 40 patients with headaches causing an impact on daily living (moderate, substantial, or intense headache), 70% had improvement of at least 1 category on HIT-6 by 6 months postoperatively, while headache worsened in 7.6% of patients. The best predictors of headache response to surgery included younger age, poor preoperative SF-36 mental health score, and hormone-producing microadenoma. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study confirm that surgery can significantly improve headaches in patients with pituitary adenomas by 6 months postoperatively, particularly in younger patients whose preoperative QOL is impacted. A larger multicenter study is underway to evaluate the long-term effect of surgery on headaches in this patient group.

Truncated somatostatin receptor 5 may modulate therapy response to somatostatin analogues--Observations in two patients with acromegaly and severe headache

BACKGROUND

Somatotropinomas have unique "fingerprints" of somatostatin receptor (sst) expression, which are targets in treatment of acromegaly with somatostatin analogues (SSAs). However, a significant expression of sst is not always related to the biochemical response to SSAs. Headache is a common complaint in acromegaly and considered a clinical marker of disease activity. SSAs are reported to have an own analgesic effect, but the sst involved are unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated sst expression in two acromegalic patients with severe headache and no biochemical effects of octreotide, but a good response to pasireotide. We searched the literature for determinants of biochemical and analgesic effects of SSAs in somatotropinomas.

RESULTS

Case 1 had no biochemical or analgesic effects of octreotide, a semi-selective SSA, but a rapid and significant effect of pasireotide, a pan-SSA. Case 2 demonstrated discordance between analgesic and biochemical effects of octreotide, in that headache disappeared, but without biochemical improvement. In contrast, pasireotide normalized insulin-like growth factor 1. Both adenomas were sparsely granulated and had strong membranous expressions of sst2a in 50-75% and sst5 in 75-100% of tumor cells. The truncated sst5 variant TMD4 (sst5TMD4) showed expression in 20-57% of tumor cells.

CONCLUSIONS

A poor biochemical response to octreotide may be associated with tumor expression of a truncated sst5 variant, despite abundant sst2a expression, suggesting an influence from variant sst5 on common sst signaling pathways. Furthermore, unrelated analgesic and biochemical effects of SSAs supported a complex pathogenesis of acromegaly-associated headache. Finally, assessment of truncated sst5 in addition to full length sst could be important for a choice of postoperative SSA treatment in somatotropinomas.

Prolactinoma-associated headache and dopamine agonist treatment

AIM

The aim of this article is to investigate the phenotype and etiology of prolactinoma-associated headache as well as present and discuss the plausible pain-relieving effect of dopamine agonist treatment.

METHODS

In this case-based audit we included 11 patients with prolactinomas and one patient with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia presenting with headache that subsequently improved or resolved after dopamine agonist treatment.

RESULTS

A significant ipsilateral location of tumor mass and reported headache symptoms was observed (p = 0.018). After dopamine agonist treatment seven out of 12 patients became pain free within 2.5 months; after one year of treatment 11 out of 12 reported headache improvement or resolution. Average tumor volume reduction after treatment was 47 ± 22% during 9.5 ± 8.4 months of follow-up. There was no significant association between headache relief and tumor shrinkage (p = 0.43) or normalization of serum prolactin (p = 1.00), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

1) The significant association between lateralization of tumor and headache suggests a mechanical origin of the headache, 2) headache responded to dopamine agonist treatment in most patients, and 3) our observations encourage future prospective controlled trials to investigate the role of hyperprolactinemia in the pathogenesis of headache as well as the therapeutic effects of dopamine agonists.

Headache and pituitary disease: a systematic review

Headache is very common in pituitary disease and is reported to be present in more than a third of all patients with pituitary adenomas. Tumour size, cavernous sinus invasion, traction or displacement of intracranial pain-sensitive structures such as blood vessels, cranial nerves and dura mater, and hormonal hypersecretion are implicated causes. The present review attempts to systematically review the literature for any combination of headache and pituitary or hormone overproduction or deficiency. Most data available are retrospective and/or not based on the International Headache Society (IHS) classification. Whereas in pituitary apoplexy a mechanical component explains the almost universal association of the condition with headaches, this correlation is less clear in other forms of pituitary disease and a positive impact of surgery on headaches is not guaranteed. Similarly, invasion into the cavernous sinus or local inflammatory changes have been linked to headaches without convincing evidence. Some studies suggest that oversecretion of GH and prolactin may be important for the development of headaches, and treatment, particularly with somatostatin analogues, has been shown to improve symptoms in these patients. Otherwise, treatment rests on general treatment options for headaches based on an accurate clinical history and a precise classification which includes assessment of the patient's psychosocial risk factors.

Treatment of severe trigeminal headache in patients with pituitary adenomas

BACKGROUND

The incidence of headache in patients with pituitary adenomas is high, and the underlying pathological mechanisms are not completely understood.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the efficacy of percutaneous ganglion block and trigeminal rhizotomy in the treatment of severe trigeminal/autonomic headache associated with pituitary tumors.

METHODS

Eleven patients treated surgically for pituitary adenomas in whom intractable trigeminal headaches developed were enrolled in the study and underwent ictal cerebral single-photon emission computed tomography before starting treatment. Initially, all patients underwent a 6-month medical treatment trial. Patients who did not experience improvement in headache severity, addressed by the Headache Impact Test-6 scale, underwent trigeminal percutaneous ganglion blockade. Two patients subsequently underwent trigeminal balloon rhizotomy.

RESULTS

Among the 11 patients, 6 did not have improved Headache Impact Test-6 scale scores after 6 months of treatment with medications and underwent trigeminal ganglion blockade. Significant improvement in headache severity was noted in 3 of them. Long-term response was obtained in 1 patient, and the other 2, in whom the response was transient, were then successfully treated with trigeminal rhizotomy. Cerebral single-photon emission computed tomography showed increased uptake in the thalamus/hypothalamus region in patients who responded well to manipulation of the trigeminal-hypothalamic system.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous ganglion blockade and trigeminal rhizotomy may be promising alternative options for the treatment of severe headache in selected patients with pituitary adenomas.

Secondary headaches: secondary or still primary?

The second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders makes a distinction between primary and secondary headaches. The diagnosis of a secondary headache is made if the underlying disease is thought to cause headache or if a close temporal relationship is present together with the occurrence of the headache. At first glance, this may allow clearly secondary headaches to be distinguished from primary headaches. However, by reviewing the available literature concerning several selected secondary headaches, we will discuss the hypothesis that some secondary headaches can also be understood as a variation of primary headaches in the sense that the underlying cause (e.g. infusion of glyceryl trinitrate [ICHD-II 8.1.1], epilepsy [7.6.2], brain tumours [7.4], craniotomy [5.7], etc.) triggers the same neurophysiologic mechanisms that are responsible for the pain in primary headache attacks.

Headache attributed to non-vascular intracranial disorder

This chapter deals with non-vascular intracranial disorders resulting in headache. Headache attributed to high or low cerebrospinal fluid pressure is separated into headache attributed to idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), headache attributed to intracranial hypertension secondary to metabolic, toxic, or hormonal causes, headache attributed to intracranial hypertension secondary to hydrocephalus, post-dural puncture headache, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula headache, headache attributed to spontaneous (or idiopathic) low CSF pressure. Headache attributed to non-infectious inflammatory disease can be caused by neurosarcoidosis, aseptic (non-infectious) meningitis or lymphocytic hypophysitis. Headache attributed to intracranial neoplasm can be caused by increased intracranial pressure or hydrocephalus caused by neoplasm or attributed directly to neoplasm or carcinomatous meningitis. Other causes of headache include hypothalamic or pituitary hyper- or hyposecretion and intrathecal injection. Headache attributed to epileptic seizure is separated into hemicrania epileptica and post-seizure headache. Finally headache attributed to Chiari malformation type I (CM1) and the syndrome of transient headache and neurological deficits with cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytosis (HaNDL) are described.

Headache in patients with a meningioma correlates with a bone-invasive growth pattern but not with cytokine expression

We included 58 patients with meningioma in a prospective study to analyse the prevalence of and risk factors for different types of meningioma-associated headache. Twenty-three patients (40%) had meningioma-associated headache. Of these, the pain was migraine-like in five (22%) and tension-type headache (TTH)-like in 13 (57%). Sixteen of 21 (76%) experienced relief of pain intensity of at least 50% after 18–24 months. Univariate analysis revealed bone-invasive growth pattern ( P = 0.007) as a risk factor for headache and intake of antiepileptic drugs ( P = 0.04) or large surrounding oedema ( P = 0.04) as possible protective parameters. For migraine-like headache, risk factors were a positive history of migraine ( P = 0.009) and bone-invasive growth pattern ( P = 0.046) and, for TTH-like headache, only bone-invasive growth pattern ( P = 0.009). Binary logistic regression analysis added to assess predictability and interaction effects could not identify a single factor predicting the occurrence of headache in the presence of a meningioma (correct prediction in 74% by a model consisting of bone-invasive growth pattern, history of head surgery, intake of antiepileptic drugs, temporal tumour location and moderate and large surrounding oedema). Analysis of 38 tumour specimens could not confirm the hypothesis that the occurrence of headache correlates with the expression magnitude of signal substances known to be present in meningiomas [stroma cell-derived factor 1, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, vascular endothelial growth factor A] or thought to be relevant to headache/pain pathophysiology [prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2, calcitonin-related polypeptide alpha, nitric oxide synthase (NOS) 1, NOS2A, NOS3, transforming growth factor-alpha, tumour necrosis factor, tachykinin, vasoactive intestinal peptide]. The affection of bone integrity and the expression of molecules thought to be relevant to headache pathophysiology might be important for meningioma-associated headache in predisposed individuals.

Chronic headache and pituitary tumors

Pituitary tumors come to clinical attention due to endocrine dysfunction, distortion of local structures surrounding the pituitary fossa, or as an incidental finding during neuroimaging for headache. Explanations for pituitary tumor-associated headache include stretching of the dura mater and invasion of pain-producing structures within the cavernous sinus. However, small functional pituitary lesions may present with severe headache without cavernous sinus invasion or suprasellar extension. Prolactinomas and growth hormone-secreting tumors have a high prevalence of rare headache phenotypes with or without autonomic features, suggesting that biochemical abnormalities within the hypothalamo-pituitary axis may play a role in headache. Somatostatin analogues may be highly effective at aborting headache associated with functionally active pituitary lesions, particularly in the case of acromegaly. A proposed mechanism for this is inhibition of nociceptive peptides. This article summarizes the clinical features, pathophysiology, and potential treatment approaches to pituitary tumor-associated headache.

Neuropeptide and kinin antagonists

Neuropeptides and kinins are important messengers in the nervous system and--on the basis of their anatomical localisation and the effects produced when the substances themselves are administered, to animals or to human subjects-a significant number of them have been suggested to have a role in pain and inflammation. Experiments in gene deletion (knock-out or null mutant) mice and parallel experiments with pharmacological receptor antagonists in a variety of species have strengthened the evidence that a number of peptides, notably substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and the kinins have a pathophysiological role in nociception. Clinical studies with non-peptide pharmacological antagonists are now in progress to determine if blocking the action of these peptides might have utility in the treatment of pain.

No relationship between vasoactive intestinal polypeptide expression and headache in pituitary tumours

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies have noted the common presentation of pituitary tumours with significant headache. This has been considered to be one, or a combination of, increased cranial pressure, tumour size with dural stretch, or cavernous sinus invasion. Newer hypotheses suggest an association between the presence of pituitary tumour-associated headaches and the expression and release of nociceptive substances. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), a marker of the cranial parasympathetic system, is increased during acute attacks of some primary headaches, and with its expression in the pituitary may link some pituitary tumours to their headache presentations.

METHODS

Using immunohistochemical techniques, VIP expression in pituitary tumour specimens was examined to determine if there was a relationship between the presence or absence of pituitary-associated headache and the expression of VIP immunoreactivity (VIP-IR). A qualitative analysis of the VIP-IR in pituitary cells was performed by observers blinded to the headache status of each patient. The presence of VIP-IR and headache were treated as binary variables and associations tested with chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Forty-five per cent of specimens positive for VIP were from patients presenting with headache. There was no statistically significant association between the presence of VIP-IR and headache (chi(2) = 0.077, P = 0.781).

CONCLUSION

Although the significance of VIP positivity in pituitary tumour-associated headache is unknown it seems unrelated to headache. It remains possible that the mechanism of these headaches relates to the production of either an as yet unidentified peptide, or a combination of nociceptive peptides.