Effects of high efficiency post-dilution on-line hemodiafiltration or conventional hemodialysis on residual renal function and left ventricular hypertrophy

Expanded Hemodialysis with Theranova Dialyzer and Residual Kidney Function in Patients Starting Long-Term Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Expanded hemodialysis using a medium cutoff dialyzer improves the clearance of middle-molecular toxins compared with conventional hemodialysis. This study evaluated the effect of expanded hemodialysis on preserving residual kidney function in patients starting treatment with long-term hemodialysis.

Methods

Patients who initiated long-term hemodialysis were randomized to receive dialysis with either a Theranova 400 (Baxter) or a high-flux dialyzer with a similar surface area over 12 months. The primary outcome was a change in GFR over 12 months, as determined by the mean of urea and creatinine clearance. The secondary outcome was a change in 24-hour urine volume, middle molecules, and kidney injury markers.

Results

A total of 80 patients on hemodialysis (mean age [SD]: 63 [12] years; male: 52 [65%]) underwent randomization. Over 12 months, the Theranova group demonstrated a significantly smaller decrease in GFR than the high-flux group (least squares mean difference of change [95% confidence interval], −1.4 [−2.4 to −0.5] ml/min per 1.73 m2). Theranova maintained greater 24-hour urine volume until 9 months, not at 12 months, compared with the high-flux dialyzer. The reduction ratio for κ/λ free light chains, TNF-α, and growth differentiation factor-15 was higher in the Theranova group than in the high-flux group. The increase in the kidney injury marker, IGF-binding protein 7, was attenuated in the Theranova group. Hospitalization rate and mortality did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusions

This trial suggests that expanded hemodialysis using the Theranova dialyzer slowed decline in residual kidney function compared with a high-flux dialyzer in patients starting treatment with long-term hemodialysis.

Echocardiographic Indices in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease and Their Association with Hemodialysis-to-Hemodiafiltration Transfer: A Prospective Observational Study

Background and Objectives: The assessment of cardiac function in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is vital due to their high cardiovascular risk. However, contemporary echocardiographic indices and their association with hemodialysis-to-hemodiafiltration transfer are underreported in this population. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 36 ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis-to-hemodiafiltration transfer, with baseline and 3-month post-transfer comprehensive echocardiographic assessments. The key parameters included the global work index, global constructed work, global wasted work (GWW), global work efficiency (GWE), and global longitudinal strain (GLS), with secondary measures from conventional echocardiography. The baseline measures were compared to general population reference values and changes pre- to post-transfer were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Patients exhibited significant deviations from reference ranges in GWW (179.0 vs. 53.0-122.2 mmHg%), GWE (90.0 vs. 53.0-122.2%), and GLS (-16.0 vs. -24.0-(-16.0)%). Post-transfer left ventricular myocardial work and longitudinal strain remained unchanged (p > 0.05), except for increased GWW (179.0, IQR 148.0-217.0 to 233.5, IQR 159.0-315.0 mmHg%, p = 0.037) and improved mid-inferior peak systolic longitudinal strain ((-17.0, IQR -19.0-(-11.0) to -18.7, IQR -20.0-(-18.0)%, p = 0.016). The enrolled patients also showed higher left atrial diameters, left ventricular volumes, and mass, with impaired systolic function in both ventricles compared to reference values. Conclusions: This study highlights baseline impairments in contemporary echocardiographic measures (GWW, GWE, GLS) in ESRD patients versus reference values, but found no association between hemodialysis-to-hemodiafiltration transfer and most myocardial work and strain parameters.

Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD) are two possible modalities for people with kidney failure commencing dialysis. Only a few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated PD versus HD. The benefits and harms of the two modalities remain uncertain. This review includes both RCTs and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of PD, compared to HD, in people with kidney failure initiating dialysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies from 2000 to June 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for NRSIs from 2000 until 28 March 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and NRSIs evaluating PD compared to HD in people initiating dialysis were eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two investigators independently assessed if the studies were eligible and then extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using standard Cochrane methods, and relevant outcomes were extracted for each report. The primary outcome was residual kidney function (RKF). Secondary outcomes included all-cause, cardiovascular and infection-related death, infection, cardiovascular disease, hospitalisation, technique survival, life participation and fatigue.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 153 reports of 84 studies (2 RCTs, 82 NRSIs) were included. Studies varied widely in design (small single-centre studies to international registry analyses) and in the included populations (broad inclusion criteria versus restricted to more specific participants). Additionally, treatment delivery (e.g. automated versus continuous ambulatory PD, HD with catheter versus arteriovenous fistula or graft, in-centre versus home HD) and duration of follow-up varied widely. The two included RCTs were deemed to be at high risk of bias in terms of blinding participants and personnel and blinding outcome assessment for outcomes pertaining to quality of life. However, most other criteria were assessed as low risk of bias for both studies. Although the risk of bias (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) was generally low for most NRSIs, studies were at risk of selection bias and residual confounding due to the constraints of the observational study design. In children, there may be little or no difference between HD and PD on all-cause death (6 studies, 5752 participants: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.07; I2 = 28%; low certainty) and cardiovascular death (3 studies, 7073 participants: RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.59; I2 = 29%; low certainty), and was unclear for infection-related death (4 studies, 7451 participants: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.46; I2 = 56%; very low certainty). In adults, compared with HD, PD had an uncertain effect on RKF (mL/min/1.73 m2) at six months (2 studies, 146 participants: MD 0.90, 95% CI 0.23 to 3.60; I2 = 82%; very low certainty), 12 months (3 studies, 606 participants: MD 1.21, 95% CI -0.01 to 2.43; I2 = 81%; very low certainty) and 24 months (3 studies, 334 participants: MD 0.71, 95% CI -0.02 to 1.48; I2 = 72%; very low certainty). PD had uncertain effects on residual urine volume at 12 months (3 studies, 253 participants: MD 344.10 mL/day, 95% CI 168.70 to 519.49; I2 = 69%; very low certainty). PD may reduce the risk of RKF loss (3 studies, 2834 participants: RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.68; I2 = 17%; low certainty). Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on all-cause death (42 studies, 700,093 participants: RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98; I2 = 99%; very low certainty). In an analysis restricted to RCTs, PD may reduce the risk of all-cause death (2 studies, 1120 participants: RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.86; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty). PD had uncertain effects on both cardiovascular (21 studies, 68,492 participants: RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.19; I2 = 92%) and infection-related death (17 studies, 116,333 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.42; I2 = 98%) (both very low certainty). Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on the number of patients experiencing bacteraemia/bloodstream infection (2 studies, 2582 participants: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.18; I2 = 68%) and the number of patients experiencing infection episodes (3 studies, 277 participants: RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.62; I2 = 20%) (both very low certainty). PD may reduce the number of bacteraemia/bloodstream infection episodes (2 studies, 2637 participants: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.71; I2 = 24%; low certainty). Compared with HD; It is uncertain whether PD reduces the risk of acute myocardial infarction (4 studies, 110,850 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.10; I2 = 55%), coronary artery disease (3 studies, 5826 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.97; I2 = 62%); ischaemic heart disease (2 studies, 58,374 participants: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.28; I2 = 95%), congestive heart failure (3 studies, 49,511 participants: RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.21; I2 = 89%) and stroke (4 studies, 102,542 participants: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99; I2 = 0%) because of low to very low certainty evidence. Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on the number of patients experiencing hospitalisation (4 studies, 3282 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.30; I2 = 97%) and all-cause hospitalisation events (4 studies, 42,582 participants: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.29; I2 = 91%) (very low certainty). None of the included studies reported specifically on life participation or fatigue. However, two studies evaluated employment. Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on employment at one year (2 studies, 593 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.43; I2 = 97%; very low certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The comparative effectiveness of PD and HD on the preservation of RKF, all-cause and cause-specific death risk, the incidence of bacteraemia, other vascular complications (e.g. stroke, cardiovascular events) and patient-reported outcomes (e.g. life participation and fatigue) are uncertain, based on data obtained mostly from NRSIs, as only two RCTs were included.

Carbon dioxide automated digital subtraction angiography for endovascular arteriovenous fistulas creation

Recent literature shows how residual renal function (RKF), defined as the urinary clearance of urea and creatinine, is associated with a lower mortality risk in HD patients. The use of non-nephrotoxic contrast media during radiological procedure, may be useful for preservation of RKF in patients with chronic kidney disease not yet in haemodialysis. We describe the case of a 51-year-old male suffering from chronic kidney disease from 2018, due to a right nephrectomy for an adenocarcinoma, who was considered for an endovascular arteriovenous fistula (endoAVF) creation (WavelinQ endoAVF System, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, US), using Carbon Dioxide as contrast media instead of conventional iodinated ones, with optimal results. CO2 DSA permits to well recognize the patency of target vein, its connection to the perforator vein and finally the endoAVF creation without requiring supplemental iodate contrast medium. We propose, CO2 automated digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as a safer technique that could be substitutive of the standard iodinated ones, in the creation of endo AVF.

Comparison of the Impact of Conventional Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration Techniques on the Evolution of Certain Mineral Bone Parameters in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the impact of conventional hemodialysis (HDC) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) techniques on the evolution of the parameters of phosphocalcic metabolism in chronic hemodialysis patients. Methods: This is a retrospective, descriptive and analytical study carried out in the hemodialysis center of Agadir medico-surgical center during 2015. The total number of patients is 34, 18 were treated by HDC ie 52.9% of cases. Also, 16 patients underwent HDF, ie 47.1% of cases. With each of the 2 techniques, the following parameters were measured: To assess the PTH level, we performed 3 measurements. To evaluate calcium, phosphorus, albumine and CRP levels, 7 measurements were taken. The data were entered via Excel and analyzed through Jamovi 1.6.9 software. We used the Wilcoxon or the Mann-Whitney test for the means. The factors associated with the variation of the studied parameters were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyzes using the binary logistic regression model. Results: Our population was made up of 41.2% women and 58.8% men. Their average age was 55 ± 11 years. Also, 82.3% of cases had a normal build, 11.7% were overweight and 6% were moderately obese. The distribution of patients according to the causal nephropathy of chronic renal insufficiency presented a predominance of diabetic nephropathy (32.3%) followed by vascular pathology in 10 patients (29.4%). There was no statistically significant difference in the evolution of the levels of the parameters studied (PTH, calcium, phosphorus, albumin and CRP levels) over time. Univariate analysis showed that only the initial nephropathy factors: other nephropathy-vascular nephropathy (p= 0.028; OR=0.060; IC95% [0.004-0.734]) and diabetic nephropathy-vascular nephropathy (p= 0.011; OR=0.050; IC95% [0.004-0.508]) were associated with the variation of the studied parameters. The same factors also emerge in the multivariate analysis: other nephropathy-vascular nephropathy (p= 0.034; OR=0.044; IC95% [0.002-0.791]) and diabetic nephropathy-vascular nephropathy (p= 0.009; OR=0.032; IC95% [0.002-0.429]).   Conclusion: According to our results, it seems that there are no significant differences in the evolution of some mineral bone parameters studied with the HDC and HDF techniques.

CONVINCE in the context of existing evidence on haemodiafiltration

Haemodiafiltration (HDF) provides a greater removal of larger solutes and protein-bound compounds than conventional high-flux haemodialysis (HD). There are indications that the patients receiving the highest convection volumes of HDF result in an improved survival compared with HD. However, the comparative efficacy of HDF vs HD remains unproven. Here we provide a comparative account of the methodology and aims of ‘the comparison of high-dose HDF with high-flux HD’ (CONVINCE) study in the context of the totality of evidence and how this study will contribute to reaching a higher level of certainty regarding the comparative efficacy of HDF vs HD in people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).

Quality of Life and Hemodynamic Effects of Switching From Hemodialysis to Hemodiafiltration: A Canadian Controlled Cohort Study

Background:

Recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated beneficial effects of hemodiafiltration (HDF) compared with hemodialysis (HD) on mortality and hemodynamic stability. Data on quality of life in HDF compared with HD is limited.

Objective:

This study aimed to determine whether patients receiving HD experience improvements in quality of life, hemodynamic and laboratory parameters after switching to HDF.

Design:

Observational controlled cohort study.

Setting & Patients:

Adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis were followed for 3 months both before and after transfer to a new unit, where they received HDF. Prior to transfer, control patients were already treated by HDF.

Methods:

Quality of life at baseline and follow-up was measured using the validated minutes to recovery (MR) question. Dialysis data were collected for 3 consecutive sessions monthly; laboratory values were collected monthly. Wilcoxon signed rank test and repeated measures analysis of covariance were used to evaluate pre/post transfer changes and quantile regression to identify predictors of change in recovery time.

Results:

Of 227 patients, 82 died, were transplanted, were hospitalized or did not transfer, leaving 123 subjects and 22 controls for analysis. MR did not improve with switching to HDF, although patients with MR > 60 min before transfer experienced a significant decrease in their MR, compared with controls. There was no improvement in intradialytic hypotension with HDF. There were no differences in laboratory values before vs after switch.

Limitations:

Nonrandomized single-center study, including only small numbers of patients and covering a short follow-up period; hemodynamic values only evaluated over 1 week per month; residual kidney function not recorded.

Conclusions:

In this Canadian experience of HDF, patients remained stable with respect to several laboratory and dialysis related parameters. Switch to HDF was associated with substantially reduced recovery time in patients with MR > 60 minutes at baseline.

The role of once-weekly online hemodiafiltration with low protein diet for initiation of renal replacement therapy: A case series

Incremental hemodialysis (HD) has become an exciting approach according to the recognition of the importance of preserving residual kidney function (RKF). However, not all incident HD patients are suitable for this approach, particularly once-weekly HD. This is the first study which reported the effectiveness of once-weekly online-hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) plus low protein diet (LPD) in incident HD patients. All stage 5 CKD patients who had chosen HD as their treatment modality at the HD center of King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, with RKF ⩾ 3 mL/min calculated by renal clearance of urea and urine output ⩾ 800 mL/day, started the treatment with once-weekly OL-HDF. Dietitians advised patients to consume LPD (0.6-0.8 g/kg/day) on non-dialysis days and a regular protein diet on the dialysis day (1.2 g/kg/day). Eleven incident HD patients were enrolled in the study. The mean RKF and urine volume at baseline were 4.56 ± 2.21 mL/min and 2,019.54 ± 743.73 mL/day, respectively. After 6 and 12 months of follow-up, the mean RKF of the patients who remained in the once-weekly OL-HDF protocol were 3.82 ± 1.68 mL/min and 3.28 ± 0.95 mL/min, respectively. The median duration of once-weekly OL-HDF before transitioning to twice- or thrice-weekly OL-HDF was 7 months (3-24 months). The most common indication for stepping prescription was too low RKF. We reported that dialysis initiation in the university-based center with once-weekly OL-HDF in carefully selected incident HD patients combined with LPD under serial monitoring is practical. Further studies on the clinical benefits of once-weekly OL-HDF are still required.

Comparison of the effects of hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration on left ventricular hypertrophy in end-stage renal disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Whether hemodiafiltration (HDF) is better than conventional hemodialysis (HD) in improving left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), defined as reduction of the left ventricular mass index (LVMi) and increasing the ejection fraction (EF), is unclear. A systematic literature search was performed. Primary outcome was the mean difference between pre- and post-procedural LVMi. Secondary outcome was the mean difference in EF. Seven studies with a total of 845 patients were included. The pooled mean difference between pre-and post-procedural LVMi was -8.0 g/m² (95% confidence interval [CI] -13.1, -2.8). On subgroup analysis, the mean differences between pre- and post-procedural LVMi for HD and HDF were -6.7 g/m² (95% CI -14.5, 1.1) and -9.3 g/m² (95% CI -16.3, -2.3), respectively (P for subgroups = .62). Pooled mean difference between pre- and post-procedural EF was 2.4% (95% CI -1.8, 6.5). On subgroup analysis, the mean differences between pre- and post-procedural EF for HD and HDF were 3.6% (95% CI -2.7, 9.8) and 2.0% (95% CI 2.9, 6.8), respectively (P for subgroups = .68). On meta-regression, age (Beta -0.35 ± 0.05, P < .001) and longer dialysis duration (Beta -0.12 ± 0.02, P < .001) were associated with lower mean difference between pre-and post-procedural EF. No significant effects on changes in LVMi and EF were observed with HDF compared with conventional HD.

Online hemodiafiltration and mortality risk in end-stage renal disease patients: A critical appraisal of current evidence

The life expectancy of end-stage renal disease patients undergoing regular hemodialysis (HD) remains significantly lower than in the general population. Reducing excess mortality by improving renal replacement options is an unmet medical need. Online post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been promoted as the gold standard, offering improved clinical outcomes, based on numerous observational studies that suggest a reduced mortality risk and lower morbidity with HDF compared with standard HD. However, most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have failed to demonstrate a significant beneficial effect of HDF on all-cause mortality. The effects on secondary outcomes were often negligible or absent. Unfortunately, these RCTs were characterized by a moderate to high risk of bias. In post-hoc analyses of the largest RCTs and meta-analysis of individual participant data from four RCTs, HDF patients receiving the highest convection volume consistently and dose-dependently saw superior outcomes. However, as these studies were not designed a priori to clarify this issue, and there are no indisputable mechanisms underlying reduced mortality risks, we cannot exclude the possibility that the health status of patients (with vascular access as a proxy) may affect outcomes more than the convective technique itself. There is currently insufficient evidence to support the contention that high-volume HDF confers relevant benefits to patients over standard HD. The conflicting data of published RCTs reduce confidence in the superiority of high-volume convective therapy. Hopefully, ongoing large RCTs (for example, CONVINCE) may supply an indisputable answer to the crucial question of high-volume HDF.

Individualized Hemodialysis Treatment: A Perspective on Residual Kidney Function and Precision Medicine in Nephrology

Background: Residual kidney function (RKF) is often expected to inevitably and rapidly decline among hemodialysis patients and, hence, has been inadvertently ignored in clinical practice. The importance of RKF has been revisited in some recent studies. Given that patients with end-stage renal disease now tend to initiate maintenance hemodialysis therapy with higher RKF levels, there seem to be important opportunities for incremental hemo­dialysis by individualizing the dose and frequency according to their RKF levels. This approach is realigned with precision medicine and patient-centeredness. Summary: In this article, we first review the available methods to estimate RKF among hemodialysis patients. We then discuss the importance of maintaining and monitoring RKF levels based on a variety of clinical aspects, including volume overload, blood pressure control, mineral and bone metabolism, nutrition, and patient survival. We also review several potential measures to protect RKF: the use of high-flux and biocompatible membranes, the use of ultrapure dialysate, the incorporation of hemodiafiltration, incremental hemodialysis, and a low-protein diet, as well as general care such as avoiding nephrotoxic events, maintaining appropriate blood pressure, and better control of mineral and bone disorder parameters. Key Message: Individualized hemodialysis regimens may maintain RKF, lead to a better quality of life without compromising long-term survival, and ensure precision medicine and patient-centeredness in nephrology practice.

Prescribing Hemodialysis or Hemodiafiltration: When One Size Does Not Fit All the Proposal of a Personalized Approach Based on Comorbidity and Nutritional Status

There is no simple way to prescribe hemodialysis. Changes in the dialysis population, improvements in dialysis techniques, and different attitudes towards the initiation of dialysis have influenced treatment goals and, consequently, dialysis prescription. However, in clinical practice prescription of dialysis still often follows a "one size fits all" rule, and there is no agreed distinction between treatment goals for the younger, lower-risk population, and for older, high comorbidity patients. In the younger dialysis population, efficiency is our main goal, as assessed by the demonstrated close relationship between depuration (tested by kinetic adequacy) and survival. In the ageing dialysis population, tolerance is probably a better objective: "good dialysis" should allow the patient to attain a stable metabolic balance with minimal dialysis-related morbidity. We would like therefore to open the discussion on a personalized approach to dialysis prescription, focused on efficiency in younger patients and on tolerance in older ones, based on life expectancy, comorbidity, residual kidney function, and nutritional status, with particular attention placed on elderly, high-comorbidity populations, such as the ones presently treated in most European centers. Prescription of dialysis includes reaching decisions on the following elements: dialysis modality (hemodialysis (HD) or hemodiafiltration (HDF)); type of membrane (permeability, surface); and the frequency and duration of sessions. Blood and dialysate flow, anticoagulation, and reinfusion (in HDF) are also briefly discussed. The approach described in this concept paper was developed considering the following items: nutritional markers and integrated scores (albumin, pre-albumin, cholesterol; body size, Body Mass Index (BMI), Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS), and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)); life expectancy (age, comorbidity (Charlson Index), and dialysis vintage); kinetic goals (Kt/V, normalized protein catabolic rate (n-PCR), calcium phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), beta-2 microglobulin); technical aspects including vascular access (fistula versus catheter, degree of functionality); residual kidney function and weight gain; and dialysis tolerance (intradialytic hypotension, post-dialysis fatigue, and subjective evaluation of the effect of dialysis on quality of life). In the era of personalized medicine, we hope the approach described in this concept paper, which requires validation but has the merit of providing innovation, may be a first step towards raising attention on this issue and will be of help in guiding dialysis choices that exploit the extraordinary potential of the present dialysis "menu".

The protective effect of different dialysis types on residual renal function in patients with maintenance hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Residual renal function (RRF) is an important determinant of mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Different dialysis types may have different effects on RRF. We therefore conducted this meta-analysis to examine the RRF protective effect of different dialysis types for hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Dialysis types included low-flux hemodialysis (LFHD), high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD), hemodiafiltration (HDF), and hemodialysis and hemoperfusion (HD+HP). The mean of endogenous creatinine clearance rate (CCR) and urea clearance rate (Curea), or urine volume was used to estimate RRF [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 6.05-16.80].

RESULTS

There were 12 articles involving 1224 patients, including 11 random controlled trials and 1 cohort study. Meta-analysis showed that the RRF protective effect of HFHD [mean difference (MD) = 1.48, 95% CI (2.11 to 0.86), P < .01] and HD+HP [MD = 0.41, 95% CI (0.69 to 0.12), P = .005] was better than that of LFHD, and the RRF decline rate was the lowest in HFHD group [MD = 0.13, 95% CI (0.17 to 0.09), P < .01]. Descriptive analysis showed that HDF could better protect RRF when compared with LFHD. However, there was no consistency among other interventions when removing LFHD due to limited data.

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, the HFHD, HD+HP and HDF may better protect RRF, compared with LFHD.

Incremental dialysis for preserving residual kidney function-Does one size fit all when initiating dialysis?

While many patients have substantial residual kidney function (RKF) when initiating hemodialysis (HD), most patients with end stage renal disease in the United States are initiated on 3-times per week conventional HD regimen, with little regard to RKF or patient preference. RKF is associated with many benefits including survival, volume control, solute clearance, and reduced inflammation. Several strategies have been recommended to preserve RKF after HD initiation, including an incremental approach to HD initiation. Incremental HD prescriptions are personalized to achieve adequate volume control and solute clearance with consideration to a patient's endogenous renal function. This allows the initial use of less frequent and/or shorter HD treatment sessions. Regular measurement of RKF is important because HD frequency needs to be increased as RKF inevitably declines. We narratively review the results of 12 observational cohort studies of twice-weekly compared to thrice-weekly HD. Incremental HD is associated with several benefits including preservation of RKF as well as extending the event-free life of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. Patient survival and quality of life, however, has been variably associated with incremental HD. Serious risks must also be considered, including increased hospitalization and mortality perhaps related to fluid and electrolyte shifts after a long interdialytic interval. On the basis of the above literature review, and our clinical experience, we suggest patient characteristics which may predict favorable outcomes with an incremental approach to HD. These include substantial RKF, adequate volume control, lack of significant anemia/electrolyte imbalance, satisfactory health-related quality of life, low comorbid disease burden, and good nutritional status without evidence of hypercatabolism. Clinicians should engage patients in on-going conversations to prepare for incremental HD initiation and to ensure a smooth transition to thrice-weekly HD when needed.

Factors associated with residual urine volume preservation in patients undergoing hemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease in Kinshasa

BACKGROUND

Decreased residual urine volume (RUV) is associated with higher mortality in hemodialysis (HD). However, few studies have examined RUV in patients on HD in Sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of RUV among incident hemodialysis patients in Kinshasa.

METHODS

This historical cohort study enrolled 250 patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis between January 2007 and July 2013 in two hemodialysis centers in Kinshasa. RUV were collected over 24 h at the initiation of HD and 6 and 12 months later during the interdialytic period. We compared the baseline characteristics of the patients according to their initial RUV (≤ 500 ml/day vs >  500 ml/day) using Student's t, Mann-Whitney U and Chi2 tests. Linear mixed-effects models were used to search for predictors of decreased RUV by adding potentially predictive baseline covariates of the evolution of RUV to the effect of time: age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, diastolic blood pressure, diuretics, angiotensin conversion enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers, hypovolemia, chronic tubulointerstitial nephropathy, left ventricular hypertrophy and initial hemodialysis characteristic. A value of p < 0.05 was considered the threshold of statistical significance.

RESULTS

The majority of hemodialysis patients were male (68.8%, sex ratio 2.2), with a mean age of 52.5 ± 12.3 years. The population's RUV decreased with time, but with a slight deceleration. The mean RUV values were 680 ± 537 ml/day, 558 ± 442 ml/day and 499 ± 475 ml/day, respectively, at the initiation of HD and at 6 and 12 months later. The use of ACEI at the initiation of HD (beta coefficient 219.5, p < 0.001) and the presence of chronic tubulointerstitial nephropathy (beta coefficient 291.8, p = 0.007) were significantly associated with RUV preservation over time. In contrast, the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy at the initiation of HD was significantly associated with decreased RUV over time (beta coefficient - 133.9, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Among incident hemodialysis patients, the use of ACEI, the presence of chronic tubulointerstitial nephropathy and reduced left ventricular hypertrophy are associated with greater RUV preservation in the first year of dialysis.

The Relationship of Residual Renal Function with Cardiovascular Morbidity in Hemodialysis Patients and the Potential Role of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1

BACKGROUND

Residual renal function (RRF) provides several benefits to patients on dialysis. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) plays an important role in atherosclerotic lesions. We considered the relationship between RRF and cardiovascular morbidity and the significant role of MCP-1 serum concentrations in hemodiafiltration (HDF) patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 76 patients on on-line HDF. RRF was defined by interdialytic urine output, and we studied the patients in two groups according to the preservation or not of urine output. MCP-1 levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. χ2 tests were applied for the association between RRF and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral artery disease (PAD), and systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction. We built an adjusted model using logistic regression analysis for the factors which might impact on the loss of urine output.

RESULTS

χ2 tests showed a significant association between the loss of urine output and LVH, diastolic dysfunction, and PAD (χ2 = 7.4, p = 0.007; χ2 = 14.3, p = 0.001; χ2 = 4.2, p = 0.03, respectively), although the association with CAD and systolic dysfunction was found to be nonsignificant. The patients without RRF had significantly higher MCP-1, and the urine volume was inversely associated with MCP-1 (r = -465, p = 0.03). In the built adjusted model, the elevated MCP-1 was found to be a significant predictor for the loss of RRF.

CONCLUSION

The loss of RRF was significantly associated with LVH, diastolic dysfunction, and PAD in HDF patients. The increased MCP-1, affected by the lack of urine, may act as an additional underlying factor on this relationship, reflecting a progressive inflammation/oxidative stress condition.

Evaluation of the dialyser inner diameter in online haemodiafiltration

INTRODUCTION

Online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) has been associated with increased survival. To date, the influence of the inner diameter of the hollow fibres of the dialyser on convective volume has not been well established. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of increasing the inner diameter of the dialyser on the convective volume and removal capacity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included 16 patients in posdilutional OL-HDF with autosubstitution. Each patient was analysed in 4 sessions in which the inner diameter varied; 185μm (FX60 Cordiax and FX80 Cordiax) versus 210μm (FX600 Cordiax and FX800 Cordiax). Different solutes were measured at the beginning and end of each dialysis session.

RESULTS

No differences in the convective volume were found with an increased inner diameter: 32.3±3.1 vs. 31.8±3.6 l/session (FX60 vs. FX600) and 33.7±4.3 vs. 33.5±3.8 l/session (FX80 vs. FX800). The reduction percentages also did not differ: urea 83.7±4.5 vs. 84.1±3.4 for FX60 and FX600, and 82.7±4.1 vs. 83.6±3.8 for FX80 vs. FX800; creatinine similar 78.2±5.6 vs. 77.8±4.6 y 77.1±5.4 vs. 78.1±4.9; β₂-microglobulin 82.2±4.3 vs. 82.9±4.2, and 82.9±4.7 vs. 84.0±3.8; myoglobin 71.0±10 vs. 70.2±9 and 72.8±11 vs. 75.0±10; prolactin 70.4±9 vs. 68.1±9, and 72.2±10 vs. 73.4±8.2; and α₁-microglobulin 22.9±10 vs. 21.6±10, and 26.5±12 vs. 28.8±11, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The increase in the inner diameter of the hollow fibres did not result in improved convective volume and removal capacity.

The impact of dialysis modality and membrane characteristics on intradialytic hypotension

The risk of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is determined by various factors, among them dialysis modality and dialyzer membrane. We conducted a literature search in PubMed on November 1, 2016 and selected relevant randomized controlled and cross-over trials, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies published in English that investigated the association between IDH and dialysis modality and membrane, respectively. This literature search revealed 669 publications on dialysis modality, 64 on dialysis membrane, and 24 on acetate/bicarbonate dialysate. After omission of duplicate papers and publications outside the scope of this review, we selected 34 papers for inclusion, 19 on dialysis modality, 8 on dialyzer membrane, and 7 on acetate/bicarbonate dialysate. Several strands of evidence indicate that hemodiafiltration (HDF) is associated with lower IDH rates compared to hemodialysis (HD). Data do not show an unequivocal benefit of synthetic vs nonsynthetic dialyzer membranes with respect to IDH occurrence. Acetate-based vs bicarbonate-based dialysate appears to be associated with an increased IDH rate.

Preservation of residual kidney function in hemodialysis patients: reviving an old concept

Residual kidney function (RKF) may confer a variety of benefits to patients on maintenance dialysis. RKF provides continuous clearance of middle molecules and protein-bound solutes. Whereas the definition of RKF varies across studies, interdialytic urine volume may emerge as a pragmatic alternative to more cumbersome calculations. RKF preservation is associated with better patient outcomes including survival and quality of life and is a clinical parameter and research focus in peritoneal dialysis. We propose the following practical considerations to preserve RKF, especially in newly transitioned (incident) hemodialysis patients: (1) periodic monitoring of RKF in hemodialysis patients through urine volume and including residual urea clearance with dialysis adequacy and outcome markers such as anemia, fluid gains, minerals and electrolytes, nutritional, status and quality of life; (2) avoidance of nephrotoxic agents such as radiocontrast dye, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and aminoglycosides; (3) more rigorous hypertension control and minimizing intradialytic hypotensive episodes; (4) individualizing the initial dialysis prescription with consideration of an incremental/infrequent approach to hemodialysis initiation (e.g., twice weekly) or peritoneal dialysis; and (5) considering a lower protein diet, especially on nondialysis days. Because RKF appears to be associated with better patient outcomes, it requires more clinical and research focus in the care of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients.

Residual Kidney Function Decline and Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients

In patients with ESRD, residual kidney function (RKF) contributes to achievement of adequate solute clearance. However, few studies have examined RKF in patients on hemodialysis. In a longitudinal cohort of 6538 patients who started maintenance hemodialysis over a 4-year period (January 2007 through December 2010) and had available renal urea clearance (CL_urea) data at baseline and 1 year after hemodialysis initiation, we examined the association of annual change in renal CL_urea rate with subsequent survival. The median (interquartile range) baseline value and mean±SD annual change of CL_urea were 3.3 (1.9-5.0) and -1.1±2.8 ml/min per 1.73 m², respectively. Greater CL_urea rate 1 year after hemodialysis initiation associated with better survival. Furthermore, we found a gradient association between loss of RKF and all-cause mortality: changes in CL_urea rate of -6.0 and +3.0 ml/min per 1.73 m² per year associated with case mix-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 2.00 (1.55 to 2.59) and 0. 61 (0.50 to 0.74), respectively (reference: -1.5 ml/min per 1.73 m² per year). These associations remained robust against adjustment for laboratory variables and ultrafiltration rate and were consistent across strata of baseline CL_urea, age, sex, race, diabetes status, presence of congestive heart failure, and hemoglobin, serum albumin, and serum phosphorus levels. Sensitivity analyses using urine volume as another index of RKF yielded consistent associations. In conclusion, RKF decline during the first year of dialysis has a graded association with all-cause mortality among incident hemodialysis patients. The clinical benefits of RKF preservation strategies on mortality should be determined.

Revisiting the Middle Molecule Hypothesis of Uremic Toxicity: A Systematic Review of Beta 2 Microglobulin Population Kinetics and Large Scale Modeling of Hemodialysis Trials In Silico

Background

Beta-2 Microglobulin (β2M) is a prototypical “middle molecule” uremic toxin that has been associated with a higher risk of death in hemodialysis patients. A quantitative description of the relative importance of factors determining β2M concentrations among patients with impaired kidney function is currently lacking.

Methods

Herein we undertook a systematic review of existing studies reporting patient level data concerning generation, elimination and distribution of β₂M in order to develop a population model of β₂M kinetics. We used this model and previously determined relationships between predialysis β₂M concentration and survival, to simulate the population distribution of predialysis β₂M and the associated relative risk (RR) of death in patients receiving conventional thrice-weekly hemodialysis with low flux (LF) and high flux (HF) dialyzers, short (SD) and long daily (LD) HF hemodialysis sessions and on-line hemodiafiltration at different levels of residual renal function (RRF).

Results

We identified 9 studies of 106 individuals and 156 evaluations of or more compartmental kinetic parameters of β₂M. These studies used a variety of experimental methods to determine β₂M kinetics ranging from isotopic dilution to profiling of intra/inter dialytic concentration changes. Most of the patients (74/106) were on dialysis with minimal RRF, thus facilitating the estimation of non-renal elimination kinetics of β₂M. In large scale (N = 10000) simulations of individuals drawn from the population of β₂M kinetic parameters, we found that, higher dialytic removal materially affects β₂M exposures only when RRF (renal clearance of β₂M) was below 2 ml/min. In patients initiating conventional HF hemodialysis, total loss of RRF was predicted to be associated with a RR of death of more than 20%. Hemodiafiltration and daily dialysis may decrease the high risk of death of anuric patients by 10% relative to conventional, thrice weekly HF dialysis. Only daily long sessions of hemodialysis consistently reduced mortality risk between 7–19% across the range of β₂M generation rate.

Conclusions

Preservation of RRF should be considered one of the therapeutic goals of hemodialysis practice. Randomized controlled trials of novel dialysis modalities may require large sample sizes to detect an effect on clinical outcomes even if they enroll anuric patients. The developed population model for β₂M may allow personalization of hemodialysis prescription and/or facilitate the design of such studies by identifying patients with higher β₂M generation rate.

Association Between Hemodiafiltration and Hypoalbuminemia in Middle-Age Hemodialysis Patients

The advantage of hemodiafiltration (HDF) is well known. One of the disadvantages of HDF is loss of serum albumin, but this issue is still obscure. Some risk factors associated with mortality were age dependent. Studies on serum albumin/hypoalbuminemia and HDF in different age stratification were limited. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the role of HDF and other clinical variables on serum albumin values in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients of different age groups. We recruited a total of 1216 patients on MHD. Patients were divided into 4 groups by age stratification of youth (<30 years old), young-middle age (30-44 years old), middle age (45-64 years old), and old age (≥65  years old). Biochemical, hematological, nutritional, inflammatory parameters, and receiving HDF or not were recorded. The associations between age groups, HDF, and variables mentioned above were analyzed. Only in middle-age group, patients with HDF was significantly (P = 0.013) associated with serum albumin <4 g/dL. In middle-age group, a multivariate-forward logistic regression analysis showed that male sex (2.169 [1.029, 4.574], P = 0.042), inflammation (4.167 [2.043, 8.498], P < 0.001), cardiovascular disease (2.92 [1.019, 8.402], P = 0.046), serum creatinine level (0.639 [0.538, 0.758], P < 0.001), and cholesterol level (0.984 [0.975, 0.993], P = 0.001) were associated with serum albumin level <3.6 g/dL. Hepatitis C virus infection (1.911 [1.186, 3.077], P = 0.008), HDF (2.143 [1.298, 3.540], P = 0.003), inflammation (2.309 [1.549, 3.440], P < 0.001), use of arterio-venous fistula (0.518 [0.327, 0.820], P = 0.005), Kt/V (0.395 [0.193, 0.809], P = 0.011), nonanuria (0.542 [0.337, 0.870], P = 0.011), serum creatinine level (0.744 [0.669, 0.828], P < 0.001), and cholesterol level (0.993 [0.987, 0.998], P = 0.013) were associated with serum albumin level <4 g/dL. HDF can predict serum albumin level <4 g/dL in middle-age HD patients. The effect of age needs to be taken into consideration when interpreting the correlation between hypoalbuminemia and HDF.

Clinical Expectation of Online Hemodiafiltration: A Japanese Perspective

Many pieces of evidence of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) have been reported, and the clinical advantage of postdilution online HDF with sufficient substitution is now established. After the approval of online HDF in 2012, the number of online HDF patients has been dramatically increasing in Japan and reached 10% of the total dialysis population at the end of 2013. One of the marked characteristics of Japanese online HDF is a widespread use of predilution treatment and, in 2013, 90.8% of online HDFs were carried out with the predilution mode. The main reason for the wide use of predilution online HDF results from the low blood flow rate in Japan, by which it is difficult to substitute a sufficient volume during the limited treatment time. Other reasons to choose the predilution mode include the reduction of albumin loss and the suppression of membrane fouling during treatment. Contrary to postdilution treatment, adequate clinical evidence has not been reported for predilution online HDF to provide a better outcome of the patients. A further clinical trial is expected to elucidate the clinical advantages over conventional hemodialysis for predilution online HDF.

Online-haemodiafiltration vs. conventional haemodialysis: a cross-over study

BACKGROUND

The main short-term advantages of haemodiafiltration (HDF) are supposedly better removal of Beta2-microglobulin (ß2-m) and phosphate, and better haemodynamic stability. The main disadvantage is higher costs. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and biological parameters associated with HDF and high-flux haemodialysis (HD), using a cross-over design, while maintaining the same dialysis parameters.

METHODS

All patients on a 3 × 4 hours schedule were observed during 3 identical 6-months periods: HDF1 - HD - HDF2. The mean values for the 2 last months of each period were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients (76 % males, 45 % diabetic) with a mean age of 74 ± 15 years, and who had been on dialysis for 49 ± 60 months were included. The mean blood flow (329 ± 27 ml/min), dialysate flow (500 ml/min), and convection volumes (21.6 ± 3.2 L) were recorded. Patient medications were not changed. Predialysis blood pressure, phosphataemia, calcaemia, iPTH, Kt/V, nPNA and intradialytic events were similar throughout the 3 periods. Only serum albumin (34. 4 ± 3.6, 35.9 ± 3.4, 34.1 ± 4 g/L, p < 0. 0001) and ß2-m serum levels (26.1 ± 5.4, 28 ± 6, 26.5 ± 5 mg/L, p < 0.001, values shown for HDF1, HD, HDF2, respectively) were significantly lower during the HDF periods. Factor associated with higher delta serum albumin levels between HD and HDF periods was mainly a lower convection volume.

CONCLUSION

Comparing HDF and HD, we did not observe any differences in haemodynamic stability or in serum phosphate levels. Only serum ß2-m (-6% vs. HD) and albumin (-5% vs. HD) levels changed. The long-term clinical consequences of these biochemical differences should be prospectively assessed.

A randomized trial of hemodiafiltration and change in cardiovascular parameters

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Increased left ventricular mass (LVM), low ventricular ejection fraction (EF), and high pulse-wave velocity (PWV) relate to overall and cardiovascular mortality in patients with ESRD. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) versus low-flux hemodialysis (HD) on LVM, EF, and PWV.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Echocardiography was used to assess LVM and EF in 342 patients in the CONvective TRAnsport STudy followed for up to 4 years. PWV was measured in 189 patients for up to 3 years. Effect of HDF versus HD on LVM, EF, and PWV was evaluated using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 63 years, and 61% were male. At baseline, median LVM was 227 g (interquartile range [IQR], 183-279 g), and median EF was 65% (IQR, 55%-72%). Median PWV was 9.8 m/s (IQR, 7.5-12.0 m/s). There was no significant difference between the HDF and HD treatment groups in rate of change in LVM (HDF: change, -0.9 g/yr [95% confidence interval (95% CI), -8.9 to 7.7 g]; HD: change, 12.5 g/yr [95% CI, -3.0 to 27.5 g]; P for difference=0.13), EF (HDF: change, -0.3%/yr [95% CI, -2.3% to 1.8%]; HD: change, -3.4%/yr [95% CI, -5.9% to -0.9%]; P=0.17), or PWV (HDF: change, -0.0 m/s per year [95% CI, -0.4 to 0.4 m/s); HD: change, 0.0 m/s per year [95% CI, -0.3 to 0.2 m/s]; P=0.89). No differences in rate of change between treatment groups were observed for subgroups of age, sex, residual kidney function, dialysis vintage, history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or convection volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with online HDF did not affect changes in LVM, EF, or PWV over time compared with HD.