Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies

Review of the facilitators and barriers to adoption of biofortified foods and food products

Biofortification - the process of increasing the concentrations of essential nutrients in staple crops - is a means of addressing the burden of micronutrient deficiencies at a population level via existing food systems, such as smallholder farms. To realise its potential for global impact, we need to understand the factors that are associated with decisions to adopt biofortified crops and food products. We searched the literature to identify adoption determinants, i.e. barriers to (factors negatively associated) or facilitators of (factors positively associated) adoption, of biofortified crops and food products. We found 41 studies reporting facilitator(s) and/or barrier(s) of adoption. We categorised the factors using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research 2.0, resulting in a set of factors that enable or constrain adoption of biofortified foods across twenty-four constructs and five domains of this meta-theoretical determinant framework from implementation science. Facilitators of orange sweet potato adoption included knowledge about importance, relative advantage, efficient production and management practices; barriers included lacking timely access to quality vines and market remoteness (28 studies total). Facilitators of vitamin A cassava adoption included awareness of its benefits and access to information; barriers included poor road networks and scarcity of improved technology including inadequate processing/storage facilities (8). Facilitators of high-iron bean adoption included farmers' networking and high farming experience; barriers included low knowledge of bean biofortification (8). Barriers to vitamin A maize adoption included low awareness and concerns regarding yield, texture and aflatoxin contamination (1). These barriers and facilitators may be a starting point for researchers to move towards testing implementation strategies and/or for policymakers to consider before planning scale-up and continuous optimisation of ongoing projects promoting adoption of biofortified crops and food products.

Use of Implementation Science Concepts in the Study of Misinformation: A Scoping Review

Misinformation hinders the impact of public health initiatives. Efforts to counter misinformation likely do not consider the full range of factors known to affect how individuals make decisions and act on them. Implementation science tools and concepts can facilitate the development of more effective interventions against health misinformation by leveraging advances in behavior specification, uptake of evidence, and theory-guided development and evaluation of complex interventions. We conducted a scoping review of misinformation literature reviews to document whether and how important concepts from implementation science have already informed the study of misinformation. Of 90 included reviews, the most frequently identified implementation science concepts were consideration of mechanisms driving misinformation (78%) and ways to intervene on, reduce, avoid, or circumvent it (71%). Other implementation science concepts were discussed much less frequently, such as tailoring strategies to the relevant context (9%) or public involvement in intervention development (9%). Less than half of reviews (47%) were guided by any theory, model, or framework. Among the 26 reviews that cited existing theories, most used theory narratively (62%) or only mentioned/cited the theory (19%), rather than using theory explicitly to interpret results (15%) or to inform data extraction (12%). Despite considerable research and many summaries of how to intervene against health misinformation, there has been relatively little consideration of many important advances in the science of health care implementation. This review identifies key areas from implementation science that might be useful to support future research into designing effective misinformation interventions.

Evidence adaptation and tailored implementation of family bereavement support in specialised palliative care: A multi-method study

Background

Families experiencing the loss of their close other following advanced illness have varying degrees of needs that stretch into bereavement. Evidence-based recommendations for bereavement support are often not well implemented in palliative care services due to multiple system barriers and lack of contextual fit. To close this know-do gap, we undertook an implementation science research project.

Objective

To adapt evidence-informed recommendations for supporting bereaved families to the local context, and to develop a tailored implementation strategy for their integration in specialised palliative care services.

Settings and participants

Two specialised palliative care services located at urban teaching hospitals in German-speaking Switzerland. Participants were palliative care staff working in the service, including nurses, physicians, chaplains, psychologists, and two service users.

Methods

Multi-method implementation research project combining community engagement strategies, qualitative contextual analysis, and theory-driven implementation design processes for integrating evidence-informed interventions in new contexts: First, evidence was identified and adapted through co-design staff workshops and service user consultations, following intervention adaptation guidelines. Next, focus group interviews were held to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Drawing on implementation mapping methodology, a systematic and participatory process was used to develop an implementation plan that specified activities needed to address identified barriers and support integration into palliative care services.

Results

The study resulted in an adapted bereavement support pathway with three core functions of evidence-informed practices delivered during dying, at death, three-to-six, and if necessary nine-to-twelve months post-loss: screening and assessing family needs and risks, intervention and support activities for families, and team collaboration and coordination within and across providers. Implementation was expected to be influenced by the features of the intervention itself, staff competencies, and organisational conditions, with resources required being a frequent barrier, whereas workplace culture and the project-related network acted as facilitators. A multifaceted implementation strategy with 16 distinct activities was developed to reach 70 % of bereaved families: designing a practical, implementable pathway, creating necessary team capacity and roles, optimizing workflow, offering education and clinician support, ensuring leadership and organisational commitment, and facilitating mutual exchange and learning. An implementation research logic model specified expected mechanisms of impact and outcomes.

Conclusions

The project resulted in an adapted bereavement support intervention fitted to local palliative care contexts and a tailored implementation plan. Adapting evidence to specific contexts and understanding potential barriers and facilitators is necessary to prepare implementation.

Registration

https://osf.io/qgr7y.

Developing a Theory of Change and Implementation Plan to implement a novel child- and family-centred outcome measure in paediatric palliative care

BACKGROUND

To achieve benefits of person-centred outcome measures within routine children's palliative care, implementation plans and the intended pathways to impact must be established.

AIM

To develop a Theory of Change and Implementation Plan for sustained implementation of a novel person-centred outcome measure into routine hospital care for children with life-limiting conditions and to identify potential causal mechanisms.

DESIGN

Participatory workshops and a directed content analysis developed a Theory of Change. Framework analysis of workshop qualitative workshop data, supported by Normalisation Process Theory Informed an implementation plan.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Health and social care professionals and parent/carers were recruited to six online workshops through social media and networks.

RESULTS

Eight health and social care professionals and eight parents participated. The Theory of Change identified overall impact of improved care and quality of life, through improved identification of symptoms and concerns and improved communication between healthcare teams. However, for this to happen, education and training on the outcome measure, anticipated benefits, how to implement and use it are required. Logistical, resource and staffing barriers must be addressed, alongside the development of a detailed implementation plan. Analysis of workshop transcripts identified seven themes relating to the domains of Normalisation Process Theory: education and information needs, the importance of a tailored approach, stakeholder engagement and the role of champions, healthcare records and IT system support requirements, improved health outcomes, improved experience of care and evidence for service provision, development, evaluation and expansionConclusion:Future work should pilot test the Theory of Change and Implementation Plan.

Facilitators, barriers, and guidance to successful implementation of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions: A qualitative systematic review using the consolidated framework for implementation research

Background

Multidisciplinary transitional care interventions aim to improve the coordination and continuity of healthcare during hospitalization and after discharge for patients with complex care needs related to physical, nutritional, or psychosocial status. Implementing such interventions is complex as they involve many stakeholders across multiple settings. Numerous studies have evaluated patients', family members', and healthcare professionals' experiences with multidisciplinary transitional care interventions, which can provide insight into facilitators and barriers to their implementation.

Objective

To provide an overview of facilitators and barriers to implementing multidisciplinary transitional care interventions, which could be considered before developing implementation strategies.

Design

A qualitative systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Settings

Hospitals and primary care.

Participants

Adult patients admitted to a hospital, regardless of their diagnosis, as well as their family members and hospital and primary care healthcare professionals.

Methods

Embase, CINAHL, and Medline were searched for qualitative studies evaluating multidisciplinary transitional care interventions through patients', family members', and healthcare professionals' experiences and views from inception until June 2024. The methodological rigor was assessed with the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. We identified facilitators and barriers to the successful implementation of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Facilitators and barriers were categorized into pre- or post-discharge or general factors.

Results

Twelve studies were included and appraised. We identified 79 factors, mostly linked to three domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Innovation, Inner setting, and Individuals involved. Facilitators included "comprehensive follow-up care needs assessment"(pre-discharge), "immediate, tailored follow-up care"(post-discharge), and "improved communication between stakeholders"(general). Barriers included "shortage of hospital beds" and "lack of time"(pre-discharge), "lack of available primary care professionals"(post-discharge), "inconsistencies of stakeholders' schedules" and "intervention costs"(general).

Conclusions

The factors identified could serve as a non-exhaustive inventory list to inspire readers who wish to implement a multidisciplinary transitional care intervention in their settings. Digital tools and alternative financing models might overcome cost and reimbursement issues, the increasing complexity of patient care, and shortcomings, such as the lack of available hospital beds or professionals. Further research should identify effective implementation strategies, considering the pre-, post-discharge, and general factors identified.

Registration

The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023421423).

Tweetable abstract

Effective communication aids in implementing transitional care interventions, but patient care complexity and healthcare system pressures present challenges.

Home is "a different planet" when transitioning from hospital after acquired brain injury: can digital technology help bridge the two worlds?

PURPOSE

Adjusting to life following an acquired brain injury (ABI) is challenging particularly navigating the timepoint of transitioning from hospital-to-home. Digital technology has been proposed to mitigate broader transitional issues, however whilst still in its infancy more research is recommended within the ABI population. It is important to understand individual experiences in healthcare design. This study aims to identify for people with ABI [1] their unique problems experienced when transitioning hospital-to-home, and [2] how they believe digital technological solutions could solve these issues.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Interpretive description guided the review of experiences of four participants with ABI from a larger participatory action research project, where co-design workshops explored digital technological solutions supporting the transition home from inpatient ABI rehabilitation. Comparative analysis was used to analyse the data and develop themes.

RESULTS

Six themes emerged including "being told I was ready is different to being ready," "home is a different planet," digital technology can "help connect me to the real word" and "ensure everyone is on the same page."

CONCLUSION

Participants' desire to use tailored digital technology as a transition home strategy highlighted opportunities to manage expectations, and focus on unique preparation needs of participants, rather than organisational discharge goals.

A pragmatic randomized trial to compare strategies for implementing primary HPV testing for routine cervical cancer screening in a large healthcare system

BACKGROUND

Recent updates to national guidelines recommend primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening for routine cervical cancer screening alongside previously recommended screening options. However, limited guidance exists for implementation approaches that best facilitate cancer screening practice substitution and achieve optimal stakeholder-centered outcomes. We compared "centrally-administered + locally-tailored" (here after referred to as locally-tailored) vs. "centrally-administered + usual care" (here after referred to as centrally-administered) approaches for achieving substitution of HPV and cytology co-testing with primary HPV screening for routine cervical cancer screening to examine the effect of local tailoring on implementation and stakeholder-centered outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a pragmatic, cluster randomized trial embedded in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) health system, randomly assigning site groups to study arms at the level of the geographic service area (12 service area randomized). The study took place between 2020-2022. Centrally-administered implementation strategy bundles included physician and staff educational activities. Sites in the locally-tailored arm underwent local needs assessment followed by local selection, tailoring and deployment of implementation strategy bundles. The primary outcome was the proportion of primary HPV screenings among all screenings performed. Secondary stakeholder-centered outcomes included patient (knowledge, emotional reaction, satisfaction, volume of patient inquiries) and provider outcomes (perception, knowledge, acceptance, and satisfaction) measured via repeated surveys or electronic health records. The generalized estimating equation framework and the difference-in-differences approach were used to compare outcomes across study arms.

RESULTS

The proportion of appropriate screenings (i.e., use of primary HPV screening) during the post-intervention period was high, with no observed difference between study arms: 98.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96.3%-100%) for the locally-tailored arm and 99.1% (95% CI: 97.8%-100%) for the centrally-administered arm (p = 0.34). There were no statistically or clinically significant differences in patient- and provider- outcomes between study arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary HPV screening was feasible and demonstrated high fidelity in all KPSC service areas. The locally-tailored practice substitution approach and centrally-administered practice substitution approach both achieved near complete uptake of primary HPV screening. Further, similar effects on stakeholder-centered outcomes were observed for both approaches. However, generalizability of our findings may be limited due to unique features of our integrated health system.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04371887. Registered 30 April 2020, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04371887?cond=primary%20HPV%20screening&rank=5 .

How do we leverage implementation science to support and accelerate uptake of clinical practice guidelines in transfusion medicine

BACKGROUND

Developing and disseminating clinical practice guidelines is a common strategy used to inform practice and address evidence-to-practice gaps that are prominent in transfusion medicine. Despite a highly systematic method for synthesizing evidence into guideline recommendations, comparatively little attention is paid to the real-world implementation of the recommendations in routine practice. A more scientific approach drawing on learnings from the field of implementation science is therefore warranted.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this article, we propose a methodological roadmap to embed implementation science principles, frameworks, and methods to facilitate the development and uptake of transfusion medicine guidelines. We draw upon research undertaken in partnership with the International Collaboration of Transfusion Medicine Guidelines (ICTMG) to illustrate the roadmap in action.

RESULTS

The methodological roadmap constitutes five steps which have been matched to existing processes for developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines: (1) environmental scan; (2) detailing who needs to do what differently, per guideline recommendation; (3) barriers and enablers assessment; (4) tailoring implementation strategies to identified barriers and enablers; and (5) implementation and evaluation of implementation strategies. For each step, we define the key concepts and methods involved, and share examples from work done with ICTMG to support transfusion medicine guideline implementation.

DISCUSSION

We intend this methodological roadmap for clinicians, researchers, and organizations involved in supporting clinical practice guideline use. Informed by principles, frameworks, and methods from implementation science, the roadmap can provide a more structured, transparent, and replicable approach to improve the implementation of guideline recommendations in transfusion medicine.

Maintaining the use of telehealth for delivering rehabilitation services in a regional hospital post-COVID19: Learning from telehealth delivery rates and staff experiences

ObjectiveTo examine what delivery format had been used to facilitate rehabilitation services over recent years and to identify barriers and enablers to using telehealth in the future.DesignMultiple method research approach.Setting:Outpatient rehabilitation service in a large regional hospital in Australia.Participants:Clinicians that deliver rehabilitation interventions including allied health professionals and nurses.Main measuresFirst, a retrospective audit of data examining the rate of telehealth use. Second, semi-structured focus groups with clinical staff to identify barriers and enablers to using telehealth. Data were thematically analysed and mapped to a behaviour change framework.ResultsPre-pandemic, 82% (n = 45,960) of rehabilitation services were delivered in-person; during peak restrictions, in-person delivery was 54% (n = 49,337). Following the ease of restrictions, 71% (n = 49,337) of the rehabilitation services were delivered in-person, 28% (n = 21,624) via phone and 1% (n = 493) via video. Telehealth use increased 11% from pre-pandemic to when restrictions were eased, driven by increased use of phone consultations. Six themes related to barriers and four themes related enablers to using telehealth were identified. Using the behaviour change framework, five interventions functions (education, training, environmental restructure, modelling and enablement) were recommended to facilitate telehealth use.ConclusionsTelehealth-delivered rehabilitation rates increased post-pandemic, primarily via phone consultations. Reported barriers and enablers highlight the need for targeted strategies, with five intervention functions identified that may support increased telehealth adoption in rehabilitation settings. Future efforts should address clinician-raised barriers to optimise telehealth integration into service delivery.

A Mixed Method Evaluation of Practitioners' Perspectives on Implementation Strategies for Healthy Eating and Active Living Policy, Systems, and Environmental Changes

CONTEXT

The National Cooperative Extension System is a leader in delivering healthy eating and active living (HEAL) policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) changes; however, these interventions are challenging, and technical assistance efforts often misalign with implementation science concepts.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to understand the importance of implementation strategies and tailoring needs to support Louisiana Nutrition and Community Health (NCH) practitioners' delivery of rural HEAL PSE changes.

DESIGN

An explanatory sequential mixed method study design was used, including a survey to rank the importance of implementation strategies for HEAL PSE changes and a follow-up interview. A review of available implementation strategies (practice activities/resources) for Louisiana HEAL PSE changes was also conducted.

SETTING

This study occurred within Louisiana and focused on NCH practitioners' ongoing HEAL PSE change efforts throughout the state, with emphasis on rural community settings.

PARTICIPANTS

All NCH practitioners were eligible to participate. "Practitioners" included Extension NCH administrators and agents/educators directly delivering HEAL PSE changes.

MAIN OUTCOMES

The main quantitative outcome was the ranked importance of implementation strategies to support NCH practitioners' delivery of HEAL PSE changes. For explanatory interviews, perceptions of higher and lower ranked implementation strategies and tailoring opportunities were of interest. The alignment of available activities/resources with possible implementation strategies was also assessed.

RESULTS

Highly ranked implementation strategies focused on engaging dedicated community partners and community members and starting small to ensure success, generate buy-in, and demonstrate feasibility. Opportunities for capacity building in these areas were identified. A lower ranked implementation strategy, changing organizational structures, was considered less likely to occur but possibly necessary to improve job satisfaction, retention, and return on investment. Available activities/resources overlapped with a few available implementation strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified opportunities to use implementation science concepts to improve program support for NCH practitioners delivering complex HEAL PSE changes.

Unravelling facilitation complexity in community pharmacy: A pragmatic tool for implementation strategy selection

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacy practice is becoming increasingly patient-centric with the development of community pharmacy services. Their implementation appears to be affected by causal relationships and interdependencies of determinants. To address these determinants, change agents need to select, operationalise strategies, and measure their impact. However, there is little real-world guidance on efficiently selecting strategies tailored to determinants.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to (1) explore the relationships between determinants and implementation strategies identified during the implementation of a Minor Ailment Service in Spanish community pharmacies and (2) develop a visual tool that links implementation strategies tailored to specific determinants for change agents to use during the facilitation process.

METHODS

The study employed a mixed methods approach within a three-year pragmatic type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. Data collection was facilitated by change agents, who utilised on-site and remote communication methods. The objectives of the change agents were to identify determinants, design and operationalise tailored implementation strategies. These data were documented and transformed into Sankey diagrams.

RESULTS

Ten change agents systematically documented 4236 determinant-strategy relationships in 92 pharmacies. The most common primary determinant domain they identified was "intervention characteristics" (n = 1843, 43.5 %). The most common secondary determinant domain was "characteristics of the individuals involved" (n = 3069, 72.5 %). The most common strategy category was "other" (n = 1808, 42.7 %). A Sankey diagram tool was developed to allow change agents to receive feedback on the effect of their strategies and select appropriate future implementation strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study inform the development of future visual tools for assisting change agents during the facilitation process. Sankey diagrams act as a generic and real-time tool, which will reduce the complexity inherent to the facilitation activity. This will facilitate prospective implementation researchers to plan implementation interventions and train change agents more efficiently, thereby optimising the change management process.

Harnessing Implementation Science in Clinical Psychology: Past, Present, and Future

Implementation science aspires to equitably accelerate the uptake of clinical research into practice to improve population health. The focus of implementation science includes individual behavior change mechanisms that are similar to those that drive the field of clinical psychology. For this reason, clinical psychologists are well-suited to take up implementation science methods in pursuit of improving the quality of behavioral health care. To do so, clinical psychologists must expand beyond individual behavior change to include a focus on organizations and systems. In this review, we reflect on ways that clinical psychologists can lead in the integration of implementation science principles and approaches into clinical psychology research and practice. We discuss the role clinical psychologists play in closing know-do gaps in behavioral health and describe how clinical psychologists can build implementation science competencies. We end with current controversies and opportunities for innovation to further improve the quality of behavioral health care.

Development of recommendations to improve implementation of medical amnesty policies in collegiate athletic settings

OBJECTIVE

To make recommendations for improving medical amnesty policy implementation in collegiate athletics based on exploration of relevant policy implementation, implementation frameworks, and athletic department input.

PARTICIPANTS

54 published peer-reviewed articles, 78 collegiate athletics professionals, 5 content experts with direct responsibilities related to policies that impact college student and athlete well-being, and 113 higher education institutions' Athletics Healthcare Administrators (AHA).

METHODS

Mixed methods using narrative literature review, surveys, and interview data. Data coding was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Using coded data from the literature review and needs assessment, we identified modifiable implementation determinants and mapped these onto implementation strategies. With feedback from key organizational representatives, ten recommendations were developed and mostly viewed as feasible.

CONCLUSIONS

We present recommendations for amnesty policy implementation within athletics departments, but additional research and evidence-based resources are needed to support implementation.

Development and validation of a pragmatic measure of context at the organizational level: The Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment (IFASIS)

BACKGROUND

Successful implementation and sustainment of interventions is heavily influenced by context. Yet the complexity and dynamic nature of context make it challenging to connect and translate findings across implementation efforts. Existing methods to assess context are typically qualitative, limiting potential replicability and utility. Existing quantitative measures and the siloed nature of implementation efforts limit possibilities for data poolinXg and harmonization. The Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment (IFASIS) was developed to be a pragmatic, quantitative, organizational-level assessment of contextual factors. The intention is to characterize context with a measure that may enhance replication and reproducibility of findings beyond single implementation case studies. Here, we present the development and validation of the IFASIS.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted to identify major concepts of established theories and frameworks to be retained. IFASIS data were examined in relation to implementation outcomes gathered from two studies. Psychometric validation efforts included content and face validity, reliability, internal consistency, and predictive and concurrent validity. Predictive validity was evaluated using generalized estimating equations (GEE) for longitudinal data on three implementation outcomes: reach, effectiveness, and implementation quality. Pragmatic properties were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The IFASIS is a 27-item, team-based, instrument that quantitatively operationalizes context. Two rating scales capture current state and importance of each item to an organization. It demonstrated strong reliability, internal consistency, and predictive and concurrent validity. There were significant associations between higher IFASIS scores and improved implementation outcomes. A one-unit increase in total IFASIS score corresponded to a 160% increase in the number of patients receiving a medication (reach). IFASIS domains of factors outside the organization, factors within the organization, and factors about the intervention, and subscales of organizational readiness, community support, and recipient needs and values, were predictive of successful implementation outcomes. IFASIS scores were also significantly associated with measures of implementation quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The IFASIS is a psychometrically and pragmatically valid instrument to assess contextual factors in implementation endeavors. Its ability to predict key implementation outcomes and facilitate data pooling across projects suggests it can play an important role in advancing the field.

Unique and shared partner priorities for supporting engagement in knowledge mobilization in pediatric pain: a best-worst scaling experiment

BACKGROUND

Engaging in partnerships is key to the success of knowledge mobilization (KM) activities; however, how best to engage partners in KM activities in the context of paediatric pain and children's health more broadly is not well understood. There is limited guidance on what supports the development of effective partnerships in KM activities with a variety of partner types. The purpose of this study was to examine the preferences and priorities of three partner groups (i.e. health professionals, researchers and patient/caregiver partners) when it comes to supporting their engagement in KM activities within paediatric pain and children's health.

METHODS

We used a case 1 (object case) best-worst scaling (BWS) experiment, a stated preferences method to assess priorities and relative importance of factors related to supporting engagement in KM activities and compare their importance across the three partner groups. Participants completed 12 tasks requiring them to select items that were most and least important to supporting their engagement in KM activities. A total of 11 items, generated through a previous elicitation task, were included in the balanced incomplete block experimental design for the BWS. Difference scores and ratio values were calculated for each group and relative comparisons were observed across groups.

RESULTS

A total of 127 participants completed the BWS experiment. All partner groups agreed that items related to relationships within teams were among the most important, while pragmatic items related to executing KM were amongst the least important. While there was relative similarity in the items ranked as important, varying priorities also emerged for each group; fit of KM activities in the clinical context was particularly important among researchers, while flexible communication was relatively more important within the patient/caregiver group. Health professionals differed the least from the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Different partner groups prioritized strong relationships when it comes to supporting engagement in KM activities, reinforcing the importance of connections in KM processes. There was nuance, however, around how partner groups valued various aspects of relationships. Individuals leading KM initiatives in paediatric pain and children's health should discuss relationships and pragmatics with partners to ensure successful collaboration and impactful activities.

Integrating cardiovascular implementation science research within healthcare systems

Only 1 in 5 evidence-based interventions make it to routine clinical practice and the evidence generated from clinical research may take 17 years to be implemented. This represents a lost opportunity to improve clinical care in healthcare systems. Implementation science refers to the study of methods to promote the adoption and integration of evidence-based practices, interventions, and policies into real-world clinical settings to positively impact population health. Therefore, implementation roadmaps can be crucial for learning healthcare systems (LHS) to bridge the research-to-practice gap, particularly for cardiovascular disease which remains the leading cause of death in the United States. Implementation models exist, all of which require a thorough understanding of the key phases of implementation for effective healthcare system incorporation and optimization (pre-implementation, implementation, monitoring the implementation, evaluation, sustaining, and scaling-up or de-implementation). This review serves as a call-to-action for involvement of large-scale LHS for cardiovascular implementation science, and provides a roadmap by summarizing various implementation science models, highlighting key implementation phases and discussing successful initiatives to improve the process. We also assess challenges associated with implementation science and provide possible solutions to improve translation of evidence in real-world clinical settings.

Strengthening the US Health Workforce to End the HIV Epidemic: Lessons Learned From 11 Ending the HIV Epidemic Jurisdictions

BACKGROUND

Supplements were awarded under the National Institutes of Health, ending the HIV epidemic (EHE) initiative to foster implementation science through community-engaged research. The objective of this study was to synthesize lessons learned, identify areas of research sufficiently studied, and present an agenda for future research on HIV health workforce development from a collaboration across 9 EHE projects in 11 jurisdictions in the United States.

METHODS

EHE supplement recipients completed a semistructured questionnaire to identify shared lessons learned about common themes of workforce development using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change frameworks. Data were synthesized to identify shared lessons learned, topic areas no longer in need of research, and next steps.

RESULTS

Project teams emphasized several strategies including clarifying roles and responsibilities, the need for dynamic training, and stigma mitigation as strategies to enhance the implementation of HIV prevention and treatment services. Strengthening organizational support through supportive supervision structures, ensuring sustainable funding, preventing turnover, addressing salary constraints, and establishing clear promotion and educational pathways were identified as useful workplace development strategies. Supplements identified lessons learned about deploying community engagement strategies to ensure communities were aware of HIV prevention and treatment services. Several areas sufficiently studied that can be deprioritized were identified and discussed.

CONCLUSION

A research agenda for workplace development moving forward is discussed with several recommendations to improve the implementation of HIV prevention and treatment programs.

Context matters: examining factors influencing the implementation of evidence-based family systems care for small and sick newborns across the care continuum

Introduction

The health and wellbeing of small and sick newborns and their families can be enhanced through family systems care (FSC) along the care continuum. FSC encompasses a broader approach than family-centered care. FSC identifies individual and family strengths while acknowledging illness-related suffering and providing expertise to help soften it through relational family systemic interventions. Contextual factors of the targeted healthcare setting need to be understood to implement FSC. This study aims to assess healthcare professionals' perceptions of health system features that may influence the successful context-adapted implementation of FSC into the care continuum for small and sick newborns and their families in the Ghanaian healthcare setting.

Methods

Cross-sectional data were collected from 143 healthcare professionals, comprising nurses, midwives, and physicians who provide maternal and newborn care at a secondary facility and 13 primary health facilities in the Hohoe Municipality, Ghana. The Context Assessment for Community Health (COACH) instrument, employing Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5 and including questions on training history, was used to collect data on FSC through self-administered interviews. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with STATA.

Results

While 48.9% of healthcare professionals reported never receiving any didactic or school-based training, the majority (96.5%) indicated a need for in-service training in FSC. From the highest score of 5, the COACH dimension for organizational resources had the lowest score (2.8). Community engagement, commitment to work, monitoring services for action, and informal payment reported scores between 3.7 and 3.9. The highest scores were reported for the leadership and work culture dimensions, at 4.1 and 4.2, respectively. Among the different units of the care continuum, the largest variations were observed in the subdimensions of organizational resources (2.5-3.4) and informal payment (3.6-4.4).

Conclusion

The COACH tool provided contextual guidance for developing training strategies to implement a contextually appropriate FSC program in Ghana, which is likely to be adaptable and relevant in other low- and middle-income countries. Healthcare professionals perceive themselves as committed, with a favorable work culture and a positive perception toward their leaders, but they report limited resources and challenges in accessing knowledge sources. These findings indicate a readiness for FSC training along the continuum of care in the perinatal period.

Trusted health system implementation strategies to increase vaccination (TRUE SYNERGI): a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to reduce HPV-related cancers

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of highly effective HPV vaccines that can reduce HPV-associated cancer mortality, HPV vaccination rates in Texas rank 48th nationwide. Although evidence shows Latino parents are more accepting of HPV vaccination than non-Hispanic parents, this disparity in vaccination rates underscores the importance of understanding Latino parental HPV vaccine hesitancy. Latinos/as typically receive healthcare at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), which often need support implementing and improving access to evidence based preventive services. However, the current literature around implementation comes from large integrated healthcare systems and there is limited research around what works in the FQHC settings with Latino/a patients. Preliminary data from our previous work suggest practice facilitation is a feasible approach for building the capacity in FQHCs to select and implement provider- and practice-level strategies for increasing vaccination rates.

METHODS

This proposal considers the HPV vaccine as the evidence-based intervention and describes the rational and study design for "TRUsted hEalth SYstem implementatioN stratEGIes to increase vaccination (TRUE SYNERGI)", a hybrid type 2 study that uses previously-piloted implementation strategies (i.e., practice facilitation, provider education, among others) to influence provider recommendations (implementation outcome) and practice-level vaccination rates (effectiveness outcome). To test whether these facilitator-driven implementation strategies influence our implementation and effectiveness outcomes, we will use a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial and randomize three FQHCs (n = 9 practices, 3 per FQHC) to three clusters. We will conduct baseline assessments at each practice, which will provide data to assist the practice facilitator in engaging with the providers and leadership to develop a tailored implementation plan for each practice. In addition, we will employ theory-guided, qualitative methods, to assess the complexity associated with context and the recipients involved in the implementation of strategies in practices, along with sustainability.

DISCUSSION

The study will advance our understanding of what it means to conduct implementation research in resource limited practices that work with populations experiencing substantial disparities. Findings from the current study will inform national implementation efforts and contribute towards future research targeting dissemination and scale-up, key foci for health equity focused implementation research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06598475) on September 9, 2024.

A comprehensive review of current status of infection prevention and control program in low- and middle-income countries

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to underscore the adoption and implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices based on the World Health Organization's Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

METHODS AND DESIGN

Systematic review.

GUIDING METHODOLOGY

Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, grey literature and reference lists of studies published between January 2018 and September 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA TO RECRUIT STUDIES

Peer reviewed full length, cross-sectional, mixed method and quasi-experimental studies written in English, conducted in LMICs and used IPCAF as assessment tool.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted on a data extraction form and quality of studies was evaluated by using the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields. Evidence was generated as a group of themes.

FINDINGS

In total, 24 studies were selected based on eligibility criteria. IPC program was implemented to a varying degree in healthcare facilities (HCFs) of LMICs. Key barriers reported were; no allocation of budget for IPC, insufficient staffing of full-time IPC professionals, absence of clear IPC goals, challenges in staff training, lack of resources, no periodic monitoring and inconsistent availability of IPC supplies.

CONCLUSIONS

There was an evidence on implementation of IPC program in the HCFs of LMICs, however, LMICs faced substantial challenges in achieving consistent and effective IPC.

Determinants of digital ICU diary implementation and use by ICU professionals: A cross-sectional survey analysis

OBJECTIVES

To identify the key determinants for implementing and utilizing a digital intensive care unit (ICU) diary among ICU professionals.

BACKGROUND

Despite the advantages of digital diaries over traditional paper ones, their implementation presents challenges that necessitate tailored strategies considering the influencing factors.

DESIGN

A multicentre, cross-sectional survey study.

METHODS

A self-developed questionnaire was administered from March to May 2023, targeting ICU professionals across four hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants rated the relevance of 34 determinants on a 5-point Likert scale across four domains: (1) Digital diary introduction and use, (2) Education and information dissemination, (3) Offering the digital diary to patients' relatives, and (4) Professionals' engagement in diary writing.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 214 professionals. The most commonly agreed-upon determinants promoting implementation were seamless accessibility (n = 200; 93.5 %), enthusiastic and motivating champions (n = 190; 88.8 %), and comprehensive information and education (n = 184; 86 %). The preferred method for disseminating information was direct instruction from champions in the teams (n = 194; 90.7 %). Promoting factors for providing digital diaries to relatives included understanding its utility (n = 203; 94.9 %) and recognizing its added value (n = 193; 90.2 %). Additionally, 132 professionals (61.7 %) expressed a positive attitude towards co-writing the digital diary.

CONCLUSION

This study identified key determinants promoting the implementation and utilization of digital diaries in ICUs among professionals. These findings lay a foundation for developing strategies to address challenges and enhance the successful implementation of digital diaries in ICU settings.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

To maximize the impact of digital diaries, it is essential to involve end users early and tailor the design for ease of use. Selecting influential champions is key, and they should receive training to lead and mentor others. Clear communication of the benefits for patients and families will foster professionals' understanding and motivation, ultimately enhancing patient care.

Selecting and tailoring implementation strategies for deimplementing fall prevention alarms in US hospitals: a group concept mapping study

OBJECTIVES

Many hospitals use fall prevention alarms, despite the limited evidence of effectiveness. The objectives of this study were (1) to identify, conceptualise and select strategies to deimplement fall prevention alarms and (2) to obtain feedback from key stakeholders on tailoring selected deimplementation strategies for the local hospital context.

METHODS

Hospital staff working on fall prevention participated in group concept mapping (GCM) to brainstorm strategies that could be used for fall prevention alarm deimplementation, sort statements into conceptually similar categories and rate statements based on importance and current use. Hospital staff also participated in site-specific focus groups to discuss current fall prevention practices, strategies prioritised through GCM and theory-informed strategies recommended by the study team, and potential barriers/facilitators to deimplementing fall prevention alarms.

RESULTS

90 hospital staff across 13 hospitals brainstormed, rated and sorted strategies for alarm deimplementation. Strategies that were rated as highly important but underutilised included creating/revising staff roles to support fall prevention (eg, hiring or designating mobility technicians) and revising policies and procedures to encourage tailored rather than universal fall precautions. 192 hospital staff across 22 hospitals participated in site-specific focus groups. Participants provided feedback on each strategy's relevance for their site (eg, if site currently has a mobility technician) and local barriers or facilitators (eg, importance of having separate champions for day and night shift). Findings were used to develop a tailored implementation package for each site that included a core set of strategies (eg, external facilitation, education, audit-and-feedback, champions), a select set of site-specific strategies (eg, designating a mobility technician to support fall prevention) and guidance for how to operationalise and implement each strategy given local barriers and facilitators.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study can be used to inform future programmes and policies aimed at deimplementing fall prevention alarms in hospitals.

Rapid response systems, antibiotic stewardship and medication reconciliation: a scoping review on implementation factors, activities and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Many patient safety practices are only partly established in routine clinical care, despite extensive quality improvement efforts. Implementation science can offer insights into how patient safety practices can be successfully adopted.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to examine the literature on implementation of three internationally used safety practices: medication reconciliation, antibiotic stewardship programmes and rapid response systems. We sought to identify the implementation activities, factors and outcomes reported; the combinations of factors and activities supporting successful implementation; and the implications of the current evidence base for future implementation and research.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO and Education Resources Information Center from January 2011 to March 2023. We included original peer-reviewed research studies or quality improvement reports. We used an iterative, inductive approach to thematically categorise data. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical cluster analyses were performed.

RESULTS

From the 159 included studies, eight categories of implementation activities were identified: education; planning and preparation; method-based approach; audit and feedback; motivate and remind; resource allocation; simulation and training; and patient involvement. Most studies reported activities from multiple categories. Implementation factors included: clinical competence and collaboration; resources; readiness and engagement; external influence; organisational involvement; QI competence; and feasibility of innovation. Factors were often suggested post hoc and seldom used to guide the selection of implementation strategies. Implementation outcomes were reported as: fidelity or compliance; proxy indicator for fidelity; sustainability; acceptability; and spread. Most studies reported implementation improvement, hindering discrimination between more or less important factors and activities.

CONCLUSIONS

The multiple activities employed to implement patient safety practices reflect mainly method-based improvement science, and to a lesser degree determinant frameworks from implementation science. There seems to be an unexploited potential for continuous adaptation of implementation activities to address changing contexts. Research-informed guidance on how to make such adaptations could advance implementation in practice.

Systematic method for developing tailored strategies for implementing point-of-care procalcitonin testing to guide antibiotic prescribing in Swiss primary care: a protocol for a mixed-methods participatory approach

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health threat, driven largely by the misuse and overuse of antibiotics. Point-of-care (POC) tests for inflammatory biomarkers like procalcitonin (PCT) have shown promise in reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. The hybrid type II ImpPro trial aims to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of POC-PCT on antibiotic prescriptions by primary care physicians (PCP) in French-speaking Switzerland. Implementation is planned to include a multifaceted strategy delivered mainly, but not exclusively, via PCP quality circles. Currently, little guidance exists on how to best tailor the implementation strategies to a specific context. This study protocol describes the comprehensive approach taken within ImpPro to develop a multifaceted and multilevel strategy for POC-PCT implementation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Our mixed-methods participatory implementation research study consists of four phases: (1) determinant identification; (2) determinant prioritisation; (3) implementation strategy ideation and (4) implementation strategy selection and refinement. All phases of the study will be guided by well-established implementation theories, models and frameworks. For 1, to identify the possible barriers and facilitators for implementation, we will conduct semistructured interviews with stakeholders followed by deductive coding using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and inductive thematic analysis. In 2, to identify the key determinants, we will conduct online focus group discussions and vote on the importance and changeability of determinants. In 3, we will conduct interviews and an expert brainstorming session, followed by deductively coding implementation ideas according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change compilation. In 4, we will conduct focus group discussions with experts and stakeholders about the APEASE criteria (ie, affordability, practicability, (cost-)effectiveness, acceptability, side effects and safety and equity) of these strategies, followed by a rapid data analysis approach to select the implementation strategies.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study does not fall within the scope of the Human Research Act, and the necessity for a formal evaluation was waived from the Cantonal Ethics Committee (Req-2023-00392). The results of our study will be shared among the Antimicrobial Stewardship in Ambulatory Care Platform network, published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and will be presented at international and national conferences.

Tailoring implementation strategies for the healthy actions and lifestyles to Avoid Dementia or Hispanos y el ALTo a la Demencia Program: Lessons learned from a survey study

BACKGROUND

Healthy Actions and Lifestyles to Avoid Dementia Program (HALT-AD) or Hispanos y el ALTo a la Demencia is a recently-developed online educational platform to help individuals identify and modify their own dementia modifiable risk factors (MRF). In light of known challenges in recruiting and retaining diverse participants in research studies, there is a need to identify data-informed strategies that will contribute to effective outreach and tailored implementation of HALT-AD among its intended users of Hispanic and non-Hispanic midlife and older adults in the US.

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors (i.e, demographic, medical, psychosocial and environmental) that may facilitate or impede effective program enrollment and participation.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study SETTING: Data from an online and self-administered survey conducted between January and April 2023 PARTICIPANTS: Residents of California, predominately San Diego, who were 50 to 85 years old, with no dementia or Alzheimer's disease, proficient in English or Spanish and with enough technical ability to complete the survey electronically (n=157; 43% Hispanic). INTERVENTION (IF ANY): none MEASUREMENTS: RedCap was used to capture answers to closed and open-ended survey questions. Mixed-methods analysis was used: For quantitative data, descriptive statistics, comparisons by group (Hispanic/non-Hispanic), and exploratory factor analysis were conducted in SPSS. Thematic analysis with open coding in Excel was used for qualitative responses.

RESULTS

Independent of ethnicity, participants' most preferred method of reach for recruitment was through a conversation with their doctor or with a family member or friend. Their least preferred method was receiving a Facebook advertisement especially among non-Hispanics. Interest in program participation did not differ by sociodemographic characteristics or self-rated satisfaction with individualized MRFs. Instead, having higher confidence in one's ability to commit to behavior change was significantly associated with higher interest in program participation. While a common theme to motivate both groups to participate was the potential to decrease dementia risk, non-Hispanics were motivated by the premise of supporting research and having a positive user experience. For program implementation, Hispanics were more likely to be interested in participating if live sessions, either online or in-person, were provided to offer support with making lifestyle changes as adjunct to completing online courses independently. In both groups, participation may be further facilitated by offering wearable devices which provide participants with feedback on lifestyle change progress.

CONCLUSIONS

A "one-size-fits-all" approach to recruitment and implementation of HALT-AD may not be effective in enrolling and retaining participants in future studies or for clinical use. Instead, a tailored approach that accounts for personal and ethnically-dependent preferences may be more beneficial.

Fostering community discussion about climate with layers of life ice cream

This study builds upon previous work suggesting food may increase concerns about climate change, even across political ideologies. Previous work examined whether reading about climate impacts on food increased concern about climate change, compared to reading about climate impacts on weather. The current paper goes beyond reading about climate impacts, to explore the potential for food experiences, such as tasting novel ice cream, to increase people's concerns about climate change. The literature has shown science curiosity and political ideology often influence public concern about climate change, but there is little study examining food experience. Participants at multiple local outdoor events and university students were offered a free 2-ounce sample of the Layers of Life ice cream, inspired by a local museum exhibit of the same name. The ice cream sample and story about the ice cream served was an engagement, or "hook" for encouraging the public to speak with researchers about climate change. After tasting the ice cream, participants were asked if they were willing to complete a survey, assessing science curiosity, psychological food involvement, and concern about climate change, as well as key demographics. Despite the novel food experience, our results show political ideology still heavily influences concerns about climate change, but science curiosity and dimensions of identity associated with food involvement also contribute to these concerns. Identity dimensions with food involvement may be a helpful way to promote more concern and thus action for climate change.

Toward the sustainability of health care innovations to "transform our world": current status and the road ahead

ABSTRACT

Inadequate sustainability of health care innovations or evidence-based interventions has led to calls from policymakers, researchers, and funders for research on how sustainability can be optimized to avoid research waste. In this discussion paper, we argue that research on health care innovation sustainability needs to be advanced. We critically examine the literature on the concept of sustainability and propose that research should address the fundamental question: How can we advance knowledge on health care innovation sustainability? We provide examples of important work undertaken in the field of implementation science, including definitions and conceptualizations of sustainability. We also highlight theories, models, and frameworks that have been proposed to inform sustainability research and guide how to plan for sustainability. Our analysis of the literature reveals a growing interest in the sustainability of health care innovations but also confirms that implementation science has yet to put sustainability at the center of its research endeavors. To assist this shift, we identify priority research gaps and use the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development as a road map for an implementation science research agenda to drive health care innovation sustainability. We propose three new research directions that, overall, aim for "better health for all, leaving no one behind." These directions include: (1) advancing substantive research on sustainability while avoiding duplication; (2) identifying barriers, facilitators, and strategies to sustain engagement with multiple partners; and (3) advancing methods and tools to support monitoring, evaluation, and revision of strategies over time.

SPANISH ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A323.

Promoting the implementation of clinical decision support systems in primary care: A qualitative exploration of implementing a Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)-guided decision support system in asthma consultations

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can promote adherence to clinical guidelines and improve patient outcomes. Exploring implementation determinants during the development of CDSSs enables intervention optimisation to promote acceptability, perceived appropriateness and fidelity during subsequent implementation. This study sought to explore how clinicians perceive the use of a CDSS which makes recommendations for asthma management based on factors including Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide testing, and how CDSSs can be designed to promote their implementation.

METHODS

Twenty-three interviews were conducted with clinicians to explore perceptions about the CDSS. Participants included asthma nurses, pharmacists, General Practitioners and respiratory nurse specialists involved in conducting asthma reviews in primary care. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes were developed: Appreciating the recommendations of the CDSS, whilst wanting to retain control; Doubt about appropriateness of CDSS recommendations, especially when you can't see how they were produced; and Potential for the CDSS to increase patients' trust and adherence to their treatment. Clinicians perceived the CDSS could help them prioritise management options and consider broader factors relating to patients' asthma symptoms, but it was important to be able to override the recommendation. Lack of transparency over how recommendations were generated and concern about appropriateness of recommendations for specific patients led to uncertainty about adhering to the CDSS. Clinically tailored recommendations were perceived to help reassure patients and/or to support their adherence to asthma management.

CONCLUSIONS

Even small changes to the content of CDSS recommendations, such as explaining how recommendations were generated and showing they are consistent with guidance, may help to overcome barriers to acceptability and perceived appropriateness for clinicians. Focusing on implementation during the development of CDSS interventions is worthwhile to help reduce the evidence-practice gap.

A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare

BACKGROUND

Variation in perioperative care persists globally. Consensus discussions may facilitate standardisation, yet the processes used to reach agreement are poorly understood. This study aimed to develop a model for conducting local consensus discussions when implementing standardised perioperative pathways. Specifically, we 1) describe how local consensus discussions are operationalised; 2) identify what guides decision making and consensus between clinicians; and 3) formulate explanatory mechanisms and identify determinants that facilitate consensus discussions.

METHODS

A qualitative, modified grounded theory study was conducted in one private hospital in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. Thirty-one participants from clinical disciplines and hospital management/leadership were included. Data were collected from nine semi-structured interviews and 16 h of participant observations during consensus development or implementation meetings. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently until theoretical saturation was achieved. Interviews and field notes were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using coding, constant comparison, detailed memo writing and data interpretation.

RESULTS

Seven individual and contextual factors crucial for building consensus, and eight mechanisms for reaching agreement were identified and integrated into a conceptual model. Seeking evidence to support decision-making emerged as the primary driver of consensus. Strong research evidence in support of a pathway component facilitated swift agreement. Where there was ambiguous evidence for a pathway component, clinicians based their decisions on a desire for professional autonomy, consideration of how their peers practice, patient preferences, practices from external organisations, or the feasibility of implementing the pathway component.

CONCLUSIONS

The Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare provides a map for healthcare organisations seeking to conduct local consensus discussions to reduce variation in care. Our findings advance our understanding of how local consensus discussions are conducted and factors that impact success when standardising care amongst clinicians.

A co-designed conceptual model for implementing falls prevention programmes for community-dwelling older adults in Singapore: a systems thinking approach

INTRODUCTION

Implementing falls prevention programmes in the community presents numerous challenges. We sought to understand the dynamics between the determinants influencing implementation to develop a common conceptual model describing the complexities of implementing falls prevention programmes in Singapore.

METHODS

A full-day group model building workshop with a series of structured activities was organised with 31 multidisciplinary stakeholders. Stakeholders who attended include healthcare professionals of different specialities (i.e. geriatrics, rehabilitation medicine, physiotherapy, nursing), community-based voluntary welfare organisations, researchers and policymakers.

RESULTS

A causal loop diagram was developed to illustrate the determinants influencing implementation of community-based fall prevention programmes. It revealed factors driving key implementation and service outcomes in supply and demand of such programmes. Determinants of these outcomes were synthesised into four themes: (i) structural factors affecting the management and resource allocation for community-based falls prevention programmes, (ii) participation in programmes affected by older adults' willingness and ability to participate, (iii) perceived value as a composite of costs and benefits, and (iv) social support and exercise self-efficacy motivating long-term adherence. Furthermore, in our analysis of feedback relationships, two organisational behaviours were identified: unsustainable growth due to resource constraints (Limits to Growth) and tensions between executing symptomatic or fundamental solutions (Eroding Goals). Stakeholders also explored strategies for effective implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

A conceptual model describing the dynamics of implementing community-based fall prevention programmes was developed. This informed the formulation of a National Falls Prevention Framework, a priority action step for the effective implementation of these programmes in Singapore.

The HAPPY concept mapping study: "To prevent injuries in young handball players it's important to…" - Perceptions among stakeholders

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify facilitators for implementing injury prevention initiatives in youth handball, and to assess stakeholders' perceptions of their importance and feasibility.

DESIGN

Mixed-method concept mapping study.

METHODS

Four stakeholder groups - coaches, administrators, health staff and players - participated in this mixed-method concept mapping study. Participants (n = 224; 19 % coaches, 22 % health staff, 63 % players, 18 % administrators) first provided statements about facilitators for implementing injury prevention initiatives in youth handball, then thematically grouped them (n = 47), before rating them (n = 57) for importance and feasibility (5-point Likert scales). Stakeholder-specific cluster maps and Go-Zone scatter plots were created. Statements rated above average for both importance and feasibility were considered as prioritized (Go-Zone 1).

RESULTS

87 unique statements were generated during brainstorming. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis resulted in similar sorting data clustering patterns for coaches, health staff, and administrators, which included federation strategies, club strategies, and coach and athlete education/knowledge. All clusters were rated >3 on average ratings of importance by all stakeholder groups. Six statements were in Go-Zone 1 for all stakeholder groups, including three statements about coach knowledge and education. Players' importance and feasibility ratings had limited overlap with other stakeholder groups' Go-Zone 1 statements. Players' Go-Zone 1 statements mainly addressed individual load management and practical training setup.

CONCLUSIONS

Coach knowledge and education, alongside collaboration among stakeholder groups, are essential when implementing injury prevention initiatives in youth handball. Stakeholder groups have varying perspectives, underscoring the importance of understanding and addressing these diverse viewpoints when implementing injury prevention initiatives in youth handball.

Study protocol: type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of routine functional status screening in VA primary care

BACKGROUND

Maintaining functional status, defined as the ability to perform daily activities such as bathing, dressing, and preparing meals, is central to older adults' quality of life, health, and ability to remain independent. Identifying functional impairments - defined as having difficulty or needing help performing these activities - is essential for clinicians to provide optimal care to older adults, and on a population level, understanding function can help anticipate service needs. Yet uptake of standardized measurement of functional status into routine patient care has been slow and inconsistent due to the burden posed by current tools. The goal of the Patient-Aligned Care Team (PACT) Functional Status Screening Initiative is to implement and evaluate a patient-centered, low-burden intervention to improve identification and management of functional impairment among older veterans in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) primary care settings.

METHODS

We will conduct a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness cluster-randomized adaptive trial at 8 VHA sites using the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to guide implementation and evaluation. During a Pre-Implementation phase, we will engage clinical partners and develop local adaptations to maximize intervention-setting fit. During an Implementation phase, we will launch a standard bundle of implementation strategies (coalition building, champions, technical assistance) and system-level audit and feedback, identify sites with low uptake, and randomize those sites to receive continued standard vs. enhanced strategies (standard strategies plus clinician-level audit and feedback). The primary implementation outcome is reach (proportion of eligible patients at each site who receive screening/assessment) and the primary effectiveness outcome is appropriate management of impairment (proportion of patients with identified impairments who receive related referrals).

DISCUSSION

Implementing routine measurement of functional status in primary care has the potential to improve identification and management of functional impairment for older veterans. Improved management includes increasing access to services and supports for veterans and family caregivers, reducing potentially preventable acute care utilization, and allowing veterans to live in the least restrictive setting for as long as possible. Implementation will also provide data to inform the delivery of proactive interventions to prevent and delay development of functional impairment and improve quality of life, health, and independence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on May 7, 2024, at NCT06404970 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ).

REPORTING GUIDELINES

Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (Additional file 1).

Use of implementation logic models in the Quadruple Aim QUERI: conceptualization and evolution

BACKGROUND

Implementation strategies are essential to deliver evidence-based programs that align with local context, resources, priorities, and preferences. However, it is not always clear how specific strategies are selected (vs. others) and strategies are not always operationalized clearly, distinctly, and dynamically. Implementation logic models provide one useful way to conceptualize the role and selection of implementation strategies, plan evaluation of their intended impacts on implementation and effectiveness outcomes, and to communicate key aspects of a project.

METHODS

This paper describes our initial plans, experiences, and lessons learned from applying implementation logic models in the Quadruple Aim Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) a large multi-study program funded by the Veterans Health Administration (VA). We began with two primary implementation strategies based on our earlier work (i.e., Iterative RE-AIM and Relational Facilitation) that were applied across three different health outcomes studies.

RESULTS

Our implementation strategies evolved over time, and new strategies were added. This evolution and reasons for changes are summarized and illustrated with the resulting logic models, both for the overall Quadruple Aim QUERI and the three specific projects. We found that implementation strategies are often not discrete, and their delivery and adaptation is dynamic and should be guided by emerging data and evolving context. Review of logic models across projects was an efficient and useful approach for understanding similarities and differences across projects.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation logic models are helpful for clarifying key objectives and issues for both study teams and implementation partners. There are challenges in logic model construction and presentation when multiple strategies are employed, and when strategies change over time. We recommend presentation of both original and periodically updated project models and provide recommendations for future use of implementation logic models.

Implementing Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) for Dementia in a Low-Resource Setting: A Case Study in Tanzania Exploring Barriers, Facilitators, and Recommendations for Practice

Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) is a group psychosocial intervention for people with mild-to-moderate dementia. Despite evidence supporting its effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and cultural adaptation internationally, CST has yet to be implemented in routine practice outside of the UK. This study consisted of multiple phases. In the first phase, we engaged stakeholders to explore the barriers and facilitators to CST implementation in Tanzania. In the second phase, we developed implementation strategies. In the third phase, we tested these strategies in a study of CST in a tertiary hospital in northern Tanzania. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided the study. We conducted stakeholder engagement with decision-makers, healthcare professionals, people with dementia and their family caregivers (n = 49) to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation. We developed an implementation plan that included 20 implementation strategies related to 12 CFIR constructs. Subsequently, we tested these strategies by running eight CST groups with 49 participants. In follow-up interviews with people with dementia, carers and healthcare professionals, we identified 18 key CFIR constructs as barriers or facilitators to successfully implementing CST. CST was compatible with the standards of care in a tertiary referral hospital in northern Tanzania. To implement CST in low-resource settings, we recommend running dementia awareness initiatives, screening for dementia in outpatients and community settings, developing a train-the-trainer model, employing a task-shifting approach, and creating a dementia-friendly space for dementia services. Our findings can inform future efforts to implement CST and other psychosocial interventions for dementia in low-resource settings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-024-00142-6.

Barriers and Facilitators in Using Surface Electromyography in Swallowing Management: An Implementation Science Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify clinician-perceived barriers and facilitators before the implementation of surface electromyography (sEMG) for swallowing management, implement sEMG biofeedback in swallowing rehabilitation sessions using implementation strategies, and investigate the perceived benefits and drawbacks after the implementation of the sEMG device from the perspectives of speech-language pathologists (SLPs).

METHOD

An initial pre-implementation survey characterized the SLPs' practices in swallowing management regarding the use of biofeedback modalities as well as facilitators and barriers to the implementation of sEMG. In the implementation phase, six SLPs attended educational and training meetings, tested, and used sEMG with patients during their swallowing sessions. Finally, a postimplementation survey and focus group assessed the six SLPs' perceptions and experiences using sEMG and identified areas for improvement in the implementation process.

RESULTS

The majority of the 44 SLPs who answered the pre-implementation survey did not use sEMG in swallowing therapy. The most frequently reported barriers to implementation were reduced sEMG knowledge and lack of training (86.4%), lack of equipment access or availability (68.2%), and patient-related barriers (36.6%). The six SLPs who participated in the implementation phase used sEMG with 30 different patients, conducting a total of 105 sessions. They reported that it was easy to use sEMG during sessions and that sEMG helped them to teach swallowing maneuvers. Additionally, they stated that patients were motivated during sEMG sessions. Ongoing training and mentoring were some of the suggestions for implementation improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

This study exemplifies the collaborative work between researchers and clinicians to facilitate the translation of technologies into clinical practice. Identifying determinants of sEMG implementation and strategies to address barriers was critical to its acceptability and adoption into clinical practice.

Preference for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Access Among Men who Have Sex With Men in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Background

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective but not widely used by men who have sex with men (MSM; 27%) in China.

Methods

In June 2023, an online cross-sectional survey with a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was distributed to PrEP-eligible MSM in China who were at least 18 years old. The DCE explored attributes of PrEP modality (daily pill, on-demand pill, injections, implants), clinical care model (same-day, 2-visit, telehealth prescription), medication pickup (clinic, community health center, pharmacy, MSM-focused community-based organization, home delivery), enhanced support (self-management, smartphone app, text reminder, anonymous peer support group), and cost.

Results

A total of 1013 MSM completed the survey; the average age was 31 years, and a quarter had used PrEP. The most influential attributes were cost (relative importance: 64.6%), followed by PrEP modality (27.7%), medication pickup (4.0%), enhanced support (3.5%), and clinical care model (0.2%). The most preferred ways to access PrEP were no-cost on-demand pill, medication home delivery, self-management, and telehealth. The predicted uptake of on-demand PrEP was higher than other modalities, increasing from 22% with no subsidy to 79% with full subsidy, holding the other 3 attributes constant.

Conclusions

Chinese MSM have strong preferences regarding accessing PrEP: Low cost is a critical priority, especially important because medication and clinical care are currently entirely unsubsidized in China. Preferences for on-demand PrEP and home delivery indicate methods that the health care system can utilize to best meet the needs of MSM and factors that should be incorporated into future interventions.

Integrated programs for common mental illnesses within primary care and community settings in Latin America: a scoping review of components and implementation strategies

Integrated programs for common mental illnesses are evidence-informed practices yet to be routinely implemented in Latin America. It synthesizes the literature on integrated programs for common mental illnesses (anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder) in Latin American primary care and community settings. It maps program components (the 'what') to the collaborative care model core components and implementation strategies (the 'how') to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy. Results from 18 programs across six countries (Belize, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru) show wide heterogeneity in component and strategy combinations. Overall, provider-level components and strategies were more common than family- or community-level ones. 'Team-based care' was the most commonly reported component, and 'family/user engagement' the least. The most common implementation strategy was 'supporting clinicians,' while 'changing infrastructure' was the least. Programs commonly addressed depression and only four followed experimental designs. We found limited evidence on the potential mechanisms of integrated program components and strategies.

Integrating Implementation Science in Interpersonal Violence Research and Practice: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators of Implementation

Despite the prevalence and harmful consequences of interpersonal violence and the growth in intervention research, applying research evidence and strategies into practice remains limited. This systematic review addresses this gap by using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR) to characterize barriers and facilitators in efforts to prevent and address interpersonal violence. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and APA PsycInfo. The searches resulted in 1,319 articles for initial screening, with 31 studies included in the final synthesis. The selected studies were original research highlighting barriers and facilitators of implementing interpersonal violence interventions for adolescents and adults across various US settings, employing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods approaches. Excluded studies included protocols, reviews, and research that did not identify barriers or facilitators of implementing violence prevention or intervention programs. Published from 2007 to 2023, the selected studies spanned healthcare, school, community, correctional, and military settings. Using the CFIR, the review identified multilevel barriers (e.g., lack of cultural relevance, leadership commitment) and facilitators (e.g., intervention adaptability, stakeholder engagement) across five domains: outer setting (external factors), inner setting (organizational characteristics) implementation process, individual characteristics, and intervention characteristics. These findings underscore the importance of adaptable, culturally relevant strategies and comprehensive stakeholder involvement for effective implementation. The review emphasizes the need for enhanced pre-implementation planning, capacity building, and organizational support to address identified barriers. Furthermore, it highlights the necessity for further research in under-researched settings, employing evidence-based implementation strategies.

Development and evaluation of an implementation strategy to increase HPV vaccination among underserved youth across Texas: a protocol paper

BACKGROUND

All for Them is a theory-based and evidence-informed multilevel, multicomponent program delivered through schools to increase HPV vaccination among medically underserved youth across Texas. Given the potential logistical challenges of program implementation, understanding how to best support the implementation and sustainment of the program is critical. The overall goals of this study are twofold: 1) develop a multifaceted implementation strategy, Implementing All for Them (IM-AFT); and 2) evaluate the impact of IM-AFT on implementation outcomes for schools and healthcare providers to successfully implement All for Them in their respective settings.

METHODS

This study is underpinned by a comprehensive and synergistic conceptual framework. We will use Social Cognitive Theory and the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation to inform important individual and organizational factors to target as part of implementation strategy development. We will use this formative work and Implementation Mapping, a systematic, iterative process that guides the use of theories, models, and frameworks, to develop IM-AFT. The three core aims of the present study are connected to the five tasks of Implementation Mapping. For Aim 1, we will develop IM-AFT using a community-based participatory research-informed approach, including a qualitative assessment of needs and assets associated with program implementation and identification of behavioral and psychosocial objectives to determine implementation outcomes. For Aim 2, we will use a mixed-methods approach to assess user experience with the IM-AFT prototype to test its feasibility, usability, and acceptability. For Aim 3, we will use a descriptive checklist to assess the impact of IM-AFT on user fidelity of program implementation.

DISCUSSION

This paper presents the detailed protocol for developing and evaluating IM-AFT to successfully implement All for Them, leveraging a systematic, community- and theory-based approach and user experience with the strategy prototype. This study will contribute to expanding limited scientific knowledge about using multiple sources to develop and evaluate specified implementation strategies for effective implementation of school-based vaccination programs. Theory-based IM-AFT will guide collaborations between schools and community health centers to improve HPV and other adolescent vaccination rates in underserved communities in Texas.

Implementation of a parent training intervention (SPARCK) to prevent childhood mental health problems: study protocol for a pragmatic implementation trial in Norwegian municipalities

BACKGROUND

Effective evidence-based interventions (EBI) are necessary to prevent and avoid negative life trajectories for children with mental health problems. Even though many EBIs prove effective when tested, few are successfully implemented and used in real-world clinical practice. As a result, many children and families do not receive the best care in due time or at all. To reduce this research-practice gap, a combined RCT and implementation study of Supportive Parents-Coping Kids (SPARCK), a parent training intervention to prevent childhood mental health problems, will be performed. This study protocol concerns the implementation part of the larger effectiveness-implementation project.

METHODS

The study is a correlational multi-site implementation study of SPARCK performed alongside a two-armed RCT, in 24 Norwegian municipalities. A quantitative three-wave longitudinal web-based data collection will be conducted among SPARCK practitioners and leaders in relevant services. We will investigate the relations between theory-driven and empirical implementation determinants and implementation outcomes, measured by fidelity, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. In addition, we will examine how these implementation determinants and outcomes are associated with the clinical outcomes of SPARCK.

DISCUSSION

The current study will investigate implementation determinants and their relation to indicators of implementation success, while simultaneously investigating effectiveness of an intervention optimized to the needs of both the target group and relevant stakeholders. Together, this may improve clinical effect, contextual fit, implementation success, and reduce the time lag between research findings and application in real-world settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05800522. Registered on 2023.03.23.

The IMproving treatment decisions for Patients with AortiC stenosis Through Shared Decision Making (IMPACT SDM) Study: study protocol for a cluster randomized stepped wedge trial

BACKGROUND

The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recommend shared decision-making (SDM) for patients with severe aortic stenosis choosing between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Although tools such as patient decision aids (DAs) and training in SDM have been shown to improve SDM, implementation of SDM and DAs is limited. The IMproving treatment decisions for Patients with AortiC stenosis Through Shared Decision Making (IMPACT SDM) study aims to (1) determine the effectiveness of the interventions (a DA and clinician SDM training) in achieving SDM (primary outcome) and improving the quality of decisions about aortic valve replacement, (2) determine the reach of the DAs and adoption of training, and (3) explore potential mechanisms of effectiveness and implementation at the patient-, clinician-, and clinic-level.

METHODS

The study is a hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation study using a cluster randomized batched stepped wedge trial with 8 sites across the USA. Eligible patients will be surveyed before and after visits with the heart valve team; clinicians will be surveyed after visits. Reach of DAs and adoption of training will be tracked. Clinicians will be interviewed regarding barriers and facilitators to implementation.

DISCUSSION

The IMPACT SDM Study seeks to provide evidence of the ability of the interventions to improve SDM and decision quality, and also to shed light on barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation to promote future implementation efforts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06171737. Registered on December 15, 2023.

The co-design of a digitally supported intervention for selecting implementation tools and actions for standards (SITAS)

BACKGROUND

Health and social care standards are multi-faceted interventions that promote quality and safe care in health systems. There is a need to apply evidence-based, rigorous and transparent methods when selecting strategies to support the implementation of standards. We aimed to develop an evidence- and theory-informed intervention to guide researchers in identifying appropriate implementation strategies and then selecting tailored support tools and actions for use when implementing a set of standards.

METHODS

Our intervention is a digital tool entitled 'Selecting Implementation Tools and Actions for Standards (SITAS).' The Medical Research Council Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions guided the design of SITAS. Co-design of SITAS, using a multi-stage and multi-methods approach included developing programme theory; identifying and prioritising enablers and barriers to implementing standards; identifying the best fit implementation framework using the Theory Comparison and Selection Tool; mapping enablers and barriers to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); identifying matching implementation strategies using the CFIR-ERIC (Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change) matching tool; mapping enablers and barriers to the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). The enablers and barriers, outputs from the CFIR-ERIC matching tool and the BCW were used to develop a prototype of the content and interactive logic within a digital tool. The prototype was refined following feedback from intended users (n = 7) at three design workshops.

RESULTS

Programme theory was developed and refined following feedback from intended users of SITAS. Twenty-three enablers and barriers were prioritised. CFIR was identified as the best fit framework with the majority of enablers and barriers (n = 15) mapped to the 'Inner Setting' domain. 'Conduct educational meetings' was the most common strategy retrieved using the CFIR-ERIC matching tool. 'Physical opportunity' was the component of the BCW with the most enablers and barriers (n = 8). A prototype of SITAS was designed in Microsoft Excel based on the aforementioned steps. Workshops with intended users provided key insights about the content, functionality and user experience for SITAS which resulted in refinements to SITAS.

CONCLUSION

We developed a practical intervention enhanced by user involvement. SITAS guides users through the process of selecting and tailoring implementation strategies to specific contexts, using core concepts of implementation science. SITAS will need to undergo formal piloting before spread and scale-up.

Development of a remote implementation support strategy to enhance integration of depression treatment into primary care settings in rural India

Introduction

Contextually responsive implementation support strategies are needed to enhance the integration of mental health services into primary health care. Technical assistance is widely used as a core "capacity building" strategy, primarily for increasing the motivation and capacity of individuals (e.g., frontline workers) to adopt evidence-based interventions in healthcare settings. This article documents the systematic design of a technical assistance strategy for supporting primary care staff (e.g., nurses) in integrating depression care, from screening to treatment, aligned with a non-communicable disease program across seven health facilities in the Sehore District of Madhya Pradesh, India.

Methods

We conducted a mapping exercise of local health facilities with dedicated staff and a literature review to inform the development of the technical assistance strategy.

Results

Reporting guidelines guided the structure of the strategy protocol. The evidence-supported strategy, called Remote Coaching Support, is tailored to the local setting. It uses quality improvement methods like the Plan-Do-Act-Study cycle and training materials to help coaches deliver support remotely via video/phone-based calls and WhatsApp messaging with the overall goal of increasing uptake and fidelity of depression screening and referral among primary care staff in alignment with an existing non-communicable diseases program.

Conclusion

The development of Remote Coaching Support involved iterative improvements through team meetings and practice-training feedback, though limitations exist due to a lack of systematic implementation standards, especially in this setting. This strategy will be tested in increasing scales to refine its application, with effectiveness and acceptability results to be evaluated in a randomized control trial.

Leveraging group model building to operationalize implementation strategies across implementation phases: an exemplar related to child maltreatment intervention selection

BACKGROUND

Implementation strategies can help support the adoption and implementation of health interventions that are appropriate for a local context and acceptable to decision makers and community members. Implementation strategies should be designed to handle the complexity of the multi-level, dynamic contexts in which interventions are implemented. Systems science theories and methods explicitly attend to complexity and can be valuable for specifying implementation strategies. Group Model Building (GMB) combines research partner engagement strategies with systems science to support researchers' and partners' learning about complex problems and to identify solutions through consensus. This paper specifies how GMB can operationalize implementation strategies - methods for supporting evidence implementation in real-world practice - and describes how GMB can aid in selecting and tailoring both health interventions and implementation strategies. A case study in child maltreatment prevention planning is provided to illustrate how GMB was used to specify the "actions" - strategy activities - for three implementation strategies (conduct local consensus discussions; build a coalition; model and simulate change) during the earliest implementation phases, with the goal of supporting intervention selection decisions. Examples are provided of generalizable research products that can be produced concurrently through GMB, in addition to contextually-driven implementation support.

METHODS

Participants (n = 8) were engaged over four sessions using tailored GMB activities. Participants generated a qualitative system dynamics model that described their theory of change for how to prevent child maltreatment in their communities. This theory of change reflected a dynamic understanding of the interconnected determinants of child maltreatment.

RESULTS

GMB was acceptable to participants and resulted in products that could be used for implementation planning (e.g., to model and simulate change) and future research. GMB fostered trust and idea sharing between participants.

CONCLUSION

GMB can facilitate learning about which outcomes are (or are not) impacted by interventions, which resources and approaches are required for quality implementation (e.g., implementation strategies), and tradeoffs in outcomes and resources between interventions. GMB also provides a structured, effective process to generate a shared implementation vision amongst participants. Lessons learned include methods for developing trust with and between participants, and the need for researchers to tailor GMB actions for participant and project needs.

Implementation Strategy for Artificial Intelligence in Radiotherapy: Can Implementation Science Help?

PURPOSE

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in radiotherapy (RT) are expected to save time and improve quality, but implementation remains limited. Therefore, we used implementation science to develop a format for designing an implementation strategy for AI. This study aimed to (1) apply this format to develop an AI implementation strategy for our center; (2) identify insights gained to enhance AI implementation using this format; and (3) assess the feasibility and acceptability of this format to design a center-specific implementation strategy for departments aiming to implement AI.

METHODS

We created an AI-implementation strategy for our own center using implementation science methods. This included a stakeholder analysis, literature review, and interviews to identify facilitators and barriers, and designed strategies to overcome the barriers. These methods were subsequently used in a workshop with teams from seven Dutch RT centers to develop their own AI-implementation plans. The applicability, appropriateness, and feasibility were evaluated by the workshop participants, and relevant insights for AI implementation were summarized.

RESULTS

The stakeholder analysis identified internal (physicians, physicists, RT technicians, information technology, and education) and external (patients and representatives) stakeholders. Barriers and facilitators included concerns about opacity, privacy, data quality, legal aspects, knowledge, trust, stakeholder involvement, ethics, and multidisciplinary collaboration, all integrated into our implementation strategy. The workshop evaluation showed high acceptability (18 participants [90%]), appropriateness (17 participants [85%]), and feasibility (15 participants [75%]) of the implementation strategy. Sixteen participants fully agreed with the format.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the need for a collaborative approach to implement AI in RT. We designed a strategy to overcome organizational challenges, improve AI integration, and enhance patient care. Workshop feedback indicates the proposed methods are useful for multiple RT centers. Insights gained by applying the methods highlight the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in the development and implementation of AI.

Framework for opioid use disorder screening and diagnosis in carceral settings

In the United States, the opioid overdose crisis disproportionately affects incarcerated individuals, with opioid overdose risk in the two weeks after release 50 times higher than the general population. As a response, many prisons and jails are starting to offer medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including methadone or buprenorphine, during incarceration or prior to release. One implementation barrier is how to identify who would benefit from treatment, given that opioid use disorder screening and diagnostic testing are imperfect, particularly in criminal-legal settings. Prisons and jails use a variety of OUD assessment strategies, including brief self-report screening tools, diagnostic interviews, review of pre-incarceration medical records, and urine drug screening, all of which may lead to false positive and false negative results. In this essay, we apply a common framework from epidemiology and other fields to conceptualize OUD assessment in carceral settings: individuals assessed for OUD can be those with OUD who are correctly offered MOUD ("true positives"), those without OUD who are offered MOUD ("false positives"), those with OUD who are not offered MOUD ("false negatives"), and those without MOUD who are not offered MOUD ("true negatives"). We discuss these assessment and treatment outcomes from the perspectives of people who are incarcerated, security staff, and healthcare staff. This framework may inform discussions between medical staff and security personnel on the implementation of MOUD programs.

Implementation approaches to improve environmental sustainability in operating theatres: a systematic review

Operating theatres consume large amounts of energy and consumables and produce large amounts of waste. There is an increasing evidence base for reducing the climate impacts of healthcare that could be enacted into routine practice; yet, healthcare-associated emissions increase annually. Implementation science aims to improve the systematic uptake of evidence-based care into practice and could, therefore, assist in addressing the environmental impacts of healthcare. The aim of this systematic search with narrative synthesis was to explore what implementation approaches have been applied to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatre activities, described by implementation phases and methodologies. A search was conducted in EMBASE, PubMed, and CINAHL, limited to English and publication since 2010. In total, 3886 articles were retrieved and 11 were included. All were in the exploratory phase (seven of 11) or initial implementation phase (four of 11), but none were in the installation or full implementation phase. Three studies utilised a recognised implementation theory, model, or framework in the design. Four studies used interprofessional education to influence individuals' behaviour to reduce waste, improve waste segregation, or reduce anaesthetic gases. Of those that utilised behaviour change interventions, all were qualitatively successful in achieving environmental improvement. There was an absence of evidence for sustained effects in the intervention studies and little follow-up from studies that explored barriers to innovation. This review demonstrates a gap between evidence for reducing environmental impacts and uptake of proposed practice changes to deliver low-carbon healthcare. Future research into 'greening' healthcare should use implementation research methods to establish a solid implementation evidence base. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42022342786.

Codesign with citizens to prevent cardiometabolic diseases in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: an interview study on needs and priorities among stakeholders in Sweden

OBJECTIVES

Cardiometabolic diseases are a global health concern, affecting socioeconomically disadvantaged groups more adversely. Effective public health interventions targeting preventable risk factors like physical inactivity and unhealthy diets are needed. Codesign with citizens presents a promising opportunity for developing context-relevant and population-relevant interventions, with high chances of adoption by the target population. This study aimed to understand the needs and priorities of key stakeholders to engage in codesign with citizens for the prevention of cardiometabolic diseases, focusing on socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in Uppsala, Sweden.

DESIGN

A qualitative case study was conducted using semistructured interviews with stakeholders working with prevention and and promotion of healthy and active living in public, private and civil society sectors. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

SETTING

Uppsala, Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 24 participants were purposively sampled.

RESULTS

While participants described the critical value of participatory processes to achieve goals in their work, they struggled to prioritise prevention efforts over time. This adversely affected the continuity of public health interventions and collaborations with other stakeholders. They also described resistance towards inclusive processes from within their organisations, as they were seen as time-consuming and generating unpredictable outcomes. Additionally, the persistence of a siloed system structure of organisations and the risks associated with accessing target populations through local intermediaries added to the challenges.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the lack of integration of organisational values and functions within and across organisations, hindering cross-sector collaboration and citizen engagement in prevention and health promotion activities. Additionally, the low priority of prevention and ineffective use of codesign hampers continuity and long-term perspectives of prevention and health promotion. To create more conducive conditions for codesign, facilitating intersectoral activities and more inclusive processes is needed and may be enabled by explicit and systematic support.

Advancing implementation science in community settings: the implementation strategies applied in communities (ISAC) compilation

BACKGROUND

Implementation strategies have predominantly been operationalized and studied in clinical settings. Implementation strategies are also needed to improve evidence-based intervention (EBI) integration in community settings, but there is a lack of systematic characterization of their use, which limits generalizability of findings. The goals of this study were to determine which implementation strategies are most used to deliver primary prevention EBIs in community settings, develop a compilation and pragmatic strategy selection process with accompanying guidance tools, and understand practitioners' preferences for dissemination.

METHODS

Purposive and snowball sampling was used to recruit community setting researchers and practitioners delivering primary prevention EBIs (nutrition, physical activity, tobacco prevention) in community settings: education, social services, city planning and transportation, workplaces, recreation/sport, faith-based, and other public health organizations. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a guide based on the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Participants were asked to describe barriers experienced and strategies used to overcome them within each RE-AIM dimension. Practitioners were also asked about preferred dissemination strategies, prompted by Diffusion of Innovations theory concepts of sources (who provides information) and channels (how information is provided). A rapid deductive approach was used to analyze findings with a coding matrix aligned with the interview guide.

RESULTS

Researchers (n = 10) and practitioners (n = 8) across all targeted settings and intervention outcomes completed interviews. Interviewees shared unique implementation strategies (N = 40) which were used to overcome barriers related to multiple RE-AIM dimensions, most commonly implementation (n = 29) and adoption (n = 27). Most frequently mentioned implementation strategies were conduct pragmatic evaluation (n = 31), provide training (n = 26), change adaptable program components (n = 26), and leverage funding sources (n = 21). Webinars (n = 6) and listservs/newsletters (n = 5) were the most mentioned dissemination channels; national public health organizations (n = 13) were the most mentioned sources.

CONCLUSIONS

Results reflect commonly used implementation strategies in community settings (e.g., training, technical assistance) and add novel strategies not reflected in current taxonomies. Dissemination preferences suggest the need to involve broad-reaching public health organizations. The resultant compilation (Implementation Strategies Applied in Communities) and strategy selection process provide resources to assist researchers and practitioners in applying strategies and improving EBI delivery in community settings.