A validation study of a dedicated software for an automated in vivo dosimetry control in radiotherapy

Validation of in vivo dose using EPID combined with fan-beam CT guidance in post-breast-conserving radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the use of in vivo dose validation during post-breast-conserving radiation for early breast cancer, the impact of image guidance on validation outcomes, and the role of inter- and intra-fractional variations on dose distribution.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients undergoing post-breast-conserving radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer were selected for in-treatment in vivo dose validation. The target area and organs at risk were re-defined using the image-guided images to quantitatively evaluate the impact of inter- and intra-fractional differences on the dose distribution. The retrospective analysis examined the in vivo dose validation outcomes.

RESULTS

The 3%3 mm/5%3 mm 2Dγ-pass (gamma pass) rates in the image-guided radiotherapy(IGRT) group were significantly higher than those in the non-IGRT(N-IGRT) group for both left and right breast cancer (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the 5%3 mm 2Dγ-pass rate of the fan-beam CT(FBCT) group was higher than that of the IGRT group and was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The target area parameters primary gross tumor volume (PGTV) D95, PGTV D2, planning target volume (PTV) D95, PTV D90, heart Dmean and V5, lung V5, and inter-fractional differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) in patients with left breast cancer. The effects of intra-fractional differences on dose distribution were statistically significant except for cardiac Dmean (p < 0.05). Similarly, the dose distribution of measures including PGTV D95, PGTV D2, PTV D95, PTV D90, Heart Dmean, and Lung V5 was strongly impacted by inter-fractional variances in patients with right breast cancer. The influence of intra-fractional differences on dose distribution was statistically significant for all parameters (p < 0.05), and they were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

When paired with fan-beam CT image guidance, electronic portal imaging device (EPID) in vivo dose validation provides a precise real-time dose delivery evaluation for patients undergoing radiation therapy for breast cancer.

Automation to facilitate optimisation of breast radiotherapy treatments using EPID-basedin vivodosimetry

Objective. To use automation to facilitate the monitoring of each treatment fraction using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) basedin vivodosimetry (IVD) system, allowing optimisation of breast radiotherapy delivery for individual patients and cohorts.Approach. A suite of in-house software was developed to reduce the number of manual interactions with the commercial IVD system, dosimetry check. An EPID specific pixel sensitivity map facilitated use of the EPID panel away from the central axis. Point dose difference and the change in standard deviation in dose were identified as useful dose metrics, with standard deviation used in preference to gamma in the presence of a systematic dose offset. Automated IVD was completed for 3261 fractions across 704 patients receiving breast radiotherapy.Main results. Multiple opportunities for treatment optimisation were identified for individual patients and across patient cohorts as a result of successful implementation of automated IVD. 5.1% of analysed fractions were out of tolerance with 27.1% of these considered true positives. True positive results were obtained on any fraction of treatment and if IVD had only been completed on the first fraction, 84.4% of true positive results would have been missed. This was made possible due to the automation that saved over 800 h of manual intervention and stored data in an accessible database.Significance. An improved EPID calibration to allow off-axis measurement maximises the number of patients eligible for IVD (36.8% of patients in this study). We also demonstrate the importance in selecting context-specific assessment metrics and how these can lead to a managable false positive rate. We have shown that the use of fully automated IVD facilitates use on every fraction of treatment. This leads to identification of areas for treatment improvement for both individuals and across a patient cohort, expanding the uses of IVD from simply gross error detection towards treatment optimisation.

AAPM Task Group Report 307: Use of EPIDs for Patient-Specific IMRT and VMAT QA

PURPOSE

Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have been widely utilized for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) and their use for transit dosimetry applications is emerging. Yet there are no specific guidelines on the potential uses, limitations, and correct utilization of EPIDs for these purposes. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 307 (TG-307) provides a comprehensive review of the physics, modeling, algorithms and clinical experience with EPID-based pre-treatment and transit dosimetry techniques. This review also includes the limitations and challenges in the clinical implementation of EPIDs, including recommendations for commissioning, calibration and validation, routine QA, tolerance levels for gamma analysis and risk-based analysis.

METHODS

Characteristics of the currently available EPID systems and EPID-based PSQA techniques are reviewed. The details of the physics, modeling, and algorithms for both pre-treatment and transit dosimetry methods are discussed, including clinical experience with different EPID dosimetry systems. Commissioning, calibration, and validation, tolerance levels and recommended tests, are reviewed, and analyzed. Risk-based analysis for EPID dosimetry is also addressed.

RESULTS

Clinical experience, commissioning methods and tolerances for EPID-based PSQA system are described for pre-treatment and transit dosimetry applications. The sensitivity, specificity, and clinical results for EPID dosimetry techniques are presented as well as examples of patient-related and machine-related error detection by these dosimetry solutions. Limitations and challenges in clinical implementation of EPIDs for dosimetric purposes are discussed and acceptance and rejection criteria are outlined. Potential causes of and evaluations of pre-treatment and transit dosimetry failures are discussed. Guidelines and recommendations developed in this report are based on the extensive published data on EPID QA along with the clinical experience of the TG-307 members.

CONCLUSION

TG-307 focused on the commercially available EPID-based dosimetric tools and provides guidance for medical physicists in the clinical implementation of EPID-based patient-specific pre-treatment and transit dosimetry QA solutions including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatments.

Improving dose delivery accuracy with EPID in vivo dosimetry: results from a multicenter study

PURPOSE

To investigate critical aspects and effectiveness of in vivo dosimetry (IVD) tests obtained by an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) in a multicenter and multisystem context.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight centers with three commercial systems-SoftDiso (SD, Best Medical Italy, Chianciano, Italy), Dosimetry Check (DC, Math Resolution, LCC), and PerFRACTION (PF, Sun Nuclear Corporation, SNC, Melbourne, FL)-collected IVD results for a total of 2002 patients and 32,276 tests. Data are summarized for IVD software, radiotherapy technique, and anatomical site. Every center reported the number of patients and tests analyzed, and the percentage of tests outside of the tolerance level (OTL%). OTL% was categorized as being due to incorrect patient setup, incorrect use of immobilization devices, incorrect dose computation, anatomical variations, and unknown causes.

RESULTS

The three systems use different approaches and customized alert indices, based on local protocols. For Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) treatments OTL% mean values were up to 8.9% for SD, 18.0% for DC, and 16.0% for PF. Errors due to "anatomical variations" for head and neck were up to 9.0% for SD and DC and 8.0% for PF systems, while for abdomen and pelvis/prostate treatments were up to 9%, 17.0%, and 9.0% for SD, DC, and PF, respectively. The comparison among techniques gave 3% for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, 7.0% (range 4.7-8.9%) for VMAT, 10.4% (range 7.0-12.2%) for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, and 13.2% (range 8.8-21.0%) for 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained with different IVD software and among centers were consistent and showed an acceptable homogeneity. EPID IVD was effective in intercepting important errors.

Using in vivo EPID images to detect and quantify patient anatomy changes with gradient dose segmented analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the utility of gradient dose segmented analysis (GDSA) in combination with in vivo electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images to predict changes in the PTV mean dose for patient cases. Also, we use the GDSA to retrospectively analyze patients treated in our clinic to assess deviations for different treatment sites and use time-series data to observe any day-to-day changes.

METHODS

In vivo EPID transit images acquired on the Varian Halcyon were analyzed for simulated errors in a phantom, including gas bubbles, weight loss, patient shifts, and an arm erroneously in the field. GDSA threshold parameters were tuned to maximize the coefficient of determination (R² ) between GDSA metrics and the change in the PTV mean dose (D_mean ) as estimated in a treatment planning system (TPS). Similarly for a gamma analysis, the gamma criteria were adjusted to maximize R² between gamma pass rate and the change in the PTV D_mean from the TPS. The predictive accuracy of these models was tested on patient data measuring the mean and standard deviation of the difference in the predicted change in PTV D_mean and the change in PTV D_mean measured in the TPS. This analysis was extended retrospectively for every patient treated over a 23-month period (n = 852 patients) to assess the range of expected deviations that occurred during routine clinical operation, as well as to assess any differences between treatment sites. Grouping patients treated on the same day, a time-series analysis was performed to determine if GDSA metrics could add value in tracking machine behavior over time.

RESULTS

For the phantom data, analyzing the errors, except for shifts, and comparing the change in PTV D_mean and GDSA mean, a maximal R²  = 0.90 was found for a dose threshold of 5% and gradient threshold of 3 mm. For the gamma approach a linear fit between the gamma pass rate for change in the PTV D_mean was assessed for different criteria, using the same image data. A maximal, R²  = 0.84 was found for a gamma criteria of 3%/3 mm, 45% lower dose threshold. For patient data, the predictive accuracy of the change in the PTV D_mean using the GDSA approach and the gamma approach was 0.09 ± 0.98 % and - 0.65 ± 2.21%, respectively. Comparing the two approaches the accuracy did not significantly differ (P = 0.38), whereas the precision of the GDSA prediction is significantly less (P < 0.001). The dosimetric impact of shifts was not detectable with either the GDSA or gamma approach. Analysis of all patients treated over 23 months showed that over 95% of fractions treated deviated from the first fraction by 2% or less. Deviations> 2% occurred most frequently for the later fractions of head-and-neck and lung treatments. Additionally, averaging the GDSA mean metric over all patients on a given treatment day showed that changes in the machine output on the order of 1% could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

GDSA of in vivo EPID images is a useful technique for monitoring patient changes during the course of treatment, particularly weight loss and tumor shrinkage. The GDSA mean provides a quantitative estimate of the change in the PTV D_mean , giving a simple, quantitative metric by which to flag patients with clinically meaningful deviations in treatment. Averaging the GDSA metric over all patients treated on a given day and tracking daily variations can also provide a flag for any systematic deviations in treatment due to machine performance.

Clinical implementation of 3D in vivo dosimetry for abdominal and pelvic stereotactic treatments

PURPOSE

To analyze results from three years of in vivo transit EPID dosimetry of abdominal and pelvic stereotactic radiotherapy and to establish tolerance levels for routine clinical use.

MATERIAL

80 stereotactic VMAT treatments (152 fractions) targeting the abdomen or pelvis were analyzed. In vivo 3D doses were reconstructed with an EPID commercial algorithm. Gamma Agreement Index (GAI) and DVH differences in Planning Target Volume (PTV) and Clinical Target Volume (CTV) were evaluated. Initial tolerance level was set to GAI > 85% in PTV. Fractions Over Tolerance Level (OTL) were deemed to be due to set-up errors, incorrect use of immobilization devices, 4D errors, transit EPID algorithm errors and unknown/unidentified errors. Statistical Process Control (SPC) was applied to determine local tolerance levels.

RESULTS

Average GAI were (82.7 ± 20.9) % in PTV and (72.9 ± 29.7) % in CTV. 37.8% of fractions resulted OTL and were classified as: set-up errors (3.3%), incorrect use of immobilization devices (2.1%), 4D errors (2.1%), EPID transit algorithm errors (17.1%). OTL causes for the remaining 13.2% of fractions were not identified. The differences between PTV and CTV measured in vivo and calculated mean dose (average difference ± standard deviation) were (-3.3% ± 3.2%) and (-2.3% ± 3.0%). When tolerance levels based on SPC to PTV mean dose differences were applied, the percentage of OTL decreased to 7% and no EPID algorithm error occurred. One error was not identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of local tolerance levels to EPID in vivo dosimetry proved to be useful for detecting extra-lung SBRT treatment errors.

In vivo dosimetry in external beam photon radiotherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice

External beam radiotherapy with photon beams is a highly accurate treatment modality, but requires extensive quality assurance programs to confirm that radiation therapy will be or was administered appropriately. In vivo dosimetry (IVD) is an essential element of modern radiation therapy because it provides the ability to catch treatment delivery errors, assist in treatment adaptation, and record the actual dose delivered to the patient. However, for various reasons, its clinical implementation has been slow and limited. The purpose of this report is to stimulate the wider use of IVD for external beam radiotherapy, and in particular of systems using electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). After documenting the current IVD methods, this report provides detailed software, hardware and system requirements for in vivo EPID dosimetry systems in order to help in bridging the current vendor-user gap. The report also outlines directions for further development and research. In vivo EPID dosimetry vendors, in collaboration with users across multiple institutions, are requested to improve the understanding and reduce the uncertainties of the system and to help in the determination of optimal action limits for error detection. Finally, the report recommends that automation of all aspects of IVD is needed to help facilitate clinical adoption, including automation of image acquisition, analysis, result interpretation, and reporting/documentation. With the guidance of this report, it is hoped that widespread clinical use of IVD will be significantly accelerated.

Analyses of integrated EPID images for on-treatment quality assurance to account for interfractional variations in volumetric modulated arc therapy

Purpose

To investigate the effects of interfractional variation, such as anatomical changes and setup errors, on dose delivery during treatment for prostate cancer (PC) and head and neck cancer (HNC) by courses of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) aided by on‐treatment electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images.

Methods

Seven patients with PC and 20 patients with HNC who had received VMAT participated in this study. After obtaining photon fluence at the position of the EPID for each treatment arc from on‐treatment integrated EPID images, we calculated the differences between the fluence for the first fraction and each subsequent fraction for each arc. The passing rates were investigated based on a tolerance level of 3% of the maximum fluence during the treatment courses and the correlations between the passing rates and anatomical changes.

Results

In PC, the median and lowest passing rates were 99.8% and 95.2%, respectively. No correlations between passing rates and interfractional variation were found. In HNC, the median passing rate of all fractions was 93.0%, and the lowest passing rate was 79.6% during the 35th fraction. Spearman’s correlation coefficients between the passing rates and changes in weight or neck volume were − 0.77 and − 0.74, respectively.

Conclusions

Analyses of the on‐treatment EPID images facilitates estimates of the interfractional anatomical variation in HNC patients during VMAT and thus improves assessments of the need for re‐planning or adaptive strategies and the timing thereof.

Evaluation of interfraction setup variations for postmastectomy radiation therapy using EPID-based in vivo dosimetry

Postmastectomy radiation therapy is technically difficult and can be considered one of the most complex techniques concerning patient setup reproducibility. Slight patient setup variations — particularly when high‐conformal treatment techniques are used — can adversely affect the accuracy of the delivered dose and the patient outcome. This research aims to investigate the inter‐fraction setup variations occurring in two different scenarios of clinical practice: at the reference and at the current patient setups, when an image‐guided system is used or not used, respectively. The results were used with the secondary aim of assessing the robustness of the patient setup procedure in use. Forty eight patients treated with volumetric modulated arc and intensity modulated therapies were included in this study. EPID‐based in vivo dosimetry (IVD) was performed at the reference setup concomitantly with the weekly cone beam computed tomography acquisition and during the daily current setup. Three indices were analyzed: the ratio R between the reconstructed and planned isocenter doses, γ% and the mean value of γ from a transit dosimetry based on a two‐dimensional γ‐analysis of the electronic portal images using 5% and 5 mm as dose difference and distance to agreement gamma criteria; they were considered in tolerance if R was within 5%, γ% > 90% and γmean < 0.4. One thousand and sixteen EPID‐based IVD were analyzed and 6.3% resulted out of the tolerance level. Setup errors represented the main cause of this off tolerance with an occurrence rate of 72.2%. The percentage of results out of tolerance obtained at the current setup was three times greater (9.5% vs 3.1%) than the one obtained at the reference setup, indicating weaknesses in the setup procedure. This study highlights an EPID‐based IVD system's utility in the radiotherapy routine as part of the patient’s treatment quality controls and to optimize (or confirm) the performed setup procedures’ accuracy.

Epid-based in vivo dose verification for lung stereotactic treatments delivered with multiple breath-hold segmented volumetric modulated arc therapy

We evaluated an EPID-based in-vivo dosimetry (IVD) method for the dose verification and the treatment reproducibility of lung SBRT-VMAT treatments in clinical routine. Ten patients with lung metastases treated with Elekta VMAT technique were enrolled. All patients were irradiated in five consecutive fractions, with total doses of 50 Gy. Set-up was carried out with the Elekta stereotactic body frame. Eight patients were simulated and treated using the Active Breath Control (ABC) system, a spirometer enabling patients to maintain a breath-hold at a predetermined lung volume. Two patients were simulated and treated in free-breathing using an abdominal compressor. IVD was performed using the SOFTDISO software. IVD tests were evaluated by means of (a) ratio R between daily in-vivo isocenter dose and planned dose and (b) γ-analysis between EPID integral portal images in terms of percentage of points with γ-value smaller than one (γ_% ) and mean γ-values (γ_mean ) using a 3%(global)/3 mm criteria. Alert criteria of ±5% for R ratio, γ_%  < 90%, and γ_mean  > 0.67 were chosen. 50 transit EPID images were acquired. For the patients treated with ABC spirometer, the results reported a high level of accuracy in dose delivery with 100% of tests within ±5%. The γ-analysis showed a mean value of γ_mean equal to 0.21 (range: 0.04-0.56) and a mean γ_% equal to 96.9 (range: 78-100). Relevant discrepancies were observed only for the two patients treated without ABC, mainly due to a blurring dose effect due to residual respiratory motion. Our method provided a fast and accurate procedure in clinical routine for verifying delivered dose as well as for detecting errors.