Isatuximab: A Review of Its Use in Multiple Myeloma

Efficacy and safety of isatuximab monotherapy to treat relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials

This pooled analysis of phase 1 and 2 clinical trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of isatuximab as monotherapy in individuals with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had previously received a median of 4.0 lines of therapy; safety data for individuals on isatuximab plus dexamethasone has also been evaluated. The efficacy analysis (n = 167) showed that isatuximab 20 mg/kg monotherapy was effective in the treatment of individuals with RRMM, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 26.3%, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.6 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 20.2 months. Isatuximab demonstrated rapid and sustained efficacy when used as monotherapy, with a median time to response of 1.0 month and a median duration of response of 10.3 months. The safety analysis, which included 477 participants from four clinical trials, showed that isatuximab had an acceptable safety profile that was consistent across all the dose groups examined. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were infusion reactions (in 45.7% of participants), most of which were of grade 1 or 2 severity and occurred during the first infusion. Overall, no safety concerns were identified. In addition, participants aged ≥ 75 years had higher ORR and longer PFS and OS than those aged < 65 years, and since the proportions of patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 did not vary significantly by age group, it appears that age does not affect the efficacy and safety of isatuximab treatment in RRMM. Further research is warranted to elaborate upon these findings.

Targeted interferon therapy with modakafusp alfa for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT

Interferon alfa has activity against multiple myeloma (MM). Modakafusp alfa is an immunocytokine comprising 2 attenuated interferon alfa-2b molecules and an anti-CD38 immunoglobulin G4 antibody, targeting delivery of interferon alfa to CD38-expressing (CD38+) immune and myeloma cells. This phase 1/2 trial enrolled patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with ≥3 prior lines of treatment and refractory to, or intolerant of, ≥1 proteasome inhibitor and ≥1 immunomodulatory drug. During dose escalation, modakafusp alfa was administered at 10 doses in 4 schedules across 13 cohorts. The primary end point was safety for dose escalation, and overall response rate (ORR) for dose expansion. We enrolled 106 patients who had received a median of 6.5 lines of prior therapy; 84% of patients had myeloma previously refractory to an anti-CD38 antibody. The most feasible dosing schedule was every 4 weeks (Q4W), at which the maximum tolerated dose was 3 mg/kg. Among 30 patients treated at 1.5 mg/kg Q4W, the ORR was 43.3%, with a median duration of response of 15.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-26.1); median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 1.2-14). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 28 (93.3%) patients, the most common were neutropenia (66.7%) and thrombocytopenia (46.7%); infections were reported in 8 (26.7%) patients (including grade 3 in 4 [16.7%]). Modakafusp alfa therapy induced upregulation of the type 1 interferon gene signature score, increased CD38 receptor density in CD38+ cells, and innate and adaptive immune cell activation. Modakafusp alfa resulted in antitumor activity and immune activation in patients with MM. AEs were primarily hematologic. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03215030.

Comprehensive safety evaluation of isatuximab in multiple myeloma using disproportionality analysis of FAERS and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, has been shown to induce apoptosis in multiple myeloma (MM) cells and is effective in both relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed MM cases. This study aims to compare the safety profile of isatuximab by examining a broader range of adverse events (AEs) using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The study analyzed FAERS data up to March 2024, identifying suspected AEs using Preferred Terms. Data extraction from FAERS was conducted using OpenVigil-2.1-MedDRA-v24. Disproportionality analysis was performed by calculating the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) with Chi-square value, and the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). For the meta-analysis, safety outcomes of isatuximab in adult patients were reviewed from RCTs sourced from databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov, employing a random-effects meta-analysis to determine the risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. The meta-analysis protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022379632). Based on the FAERS quarterly reports, a total of 2,325 AE reports were identified, with a higher incidence in men (n = 1156, 49.7%) compared to women (n = 960, 41.3%). AEs commonly observed with isatuximab therapy included neutropenia, pneumonia, infusion-related reactions, thrombocytopenia, acute kidney injury, and anemia. In our meta-analysis of three RCTs involving 1,258 patients, 659 (52.4%) in the isatuximab treatment group experienced 1,135 AEs, with 58% classified as grade three or higher. In comparison, 599 (47.6%) patients in the control group reported 906 AEs, with 59% categorized as grade three or higher. Notably, the isatuximab group showed a statistically significant increased risk of grade three or higher neutropenia (RR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.12-4.03, p = 0.0207) and a 30% increased risk of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia (RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.03-1.64, p = 0.0244). Isatuximab therapy was generally well-tolerated and exhibited a manageable safety profile. Considering these findings, future research might benefit from longer follow-up periods to capture delayed and less frequent AEs.

Antibody-Based Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies

Despite the great advancements in treatment strategies for hematological malignancies (HMs) over the years, their effective treatment remains challenging. Conventional treatment strategies are burdened with several serious drawbacks limiting their effectiveness and safety. Improved understanding of tumor immunobiology has provided novel anti-cancer strategies targeting selected immune response components. Currently, immunotherapy is counted as the fourth pillar of oncological treatment (together with surgery, chemo- and radiotherapy) and is becoming standard in the treatment regimen, alone or in combination therapy. Several categories of immunotherapies have been developed and are currently being assessed in clinical trials for the treatment of blood cancers, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, antigen-targeted antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, tumor vaccines, and adoptive cell therapies. However, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their derivatives have achieved the most notable clinical outcome so far. Since the approval of rituximab for treating B-cell malignancies, the availability of mAbs against tumor-specific surface molecules for clinical use has flourished. Antibody-based therapy has become one of the most successful strategies for immunotherapeutic cancer treatment in the last few decades, and many mAbs have already been introduced into standard treatment protocols for some hematologic malignancies. To further increase the efficacy of mAbs, they can be conjugated to radioisotopes or cytostatic drugs, so-called antibody-drug conjugates. Moreover, with the growing recognition of T-cell immunity's role in cancer development, strategies aimed at enhancing T cell activation and inhibiting mechanisms that suppress T cell function are actively being developed. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of immunotherapeutic strategies based on monoclonal antibodies and their derivatives, including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers, and checkpoint inhibitors, approved for the treatment of various HMs.

Advances in adoptive cellular immunotherapy and therapeutic breakthroughs in multiple myeloma

The basic idea of modulating the immune system to better recognize and fight tumor cells has led to the successful introduction of adoptive cellular immunotherapy (ACT). ACT-based treatment regimens, in which the patient's own immune cells are isolated and subsequently expanded (ex vivo) and reinfused, have also contributed significantly to the development of a personalized treatment strategy. Complementing this, the unprecedented advances in ACTs as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies and their derivatives such as CAR-NK, CAR-macrophages, CAR-γδT and CAR-NKT have further maximized the therapeutic outcomes. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of the development of ACTs in multiple myeloma (MM) and outline how they have evolved from an experimental form to a mainstay of standard clinical settings. Besides, we provide insights into cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) therapy, an alternative form of ACT that (as CIK or CAR-CIK) has enormous potential in the clinical spectrum of MM. We also summarize the results of the major preclinical and clinical studies of adoptive cell therapy in MM and address the current challenges (such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity) that limit its complete success in the cancer landscape.

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 1-amido-2-one-4-thio-deoxypyranose as potential antitumor agents for multiple myeloma

This study reported the design and synthesis of novel 1-amido-2-one-4-thio-deoxypyranose as inhibitors of potential drug target TRIP13 for developing new mechanism-based therapeutic agents in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). In comparison with the positive control DCZ0415, the most active compounds C16, C18, C20 and C32 exhibited strong anti-proliferative activity against human MM cell lines (ARP-1 and NCI-H929) with IC50 values of 1 ∼ 2 μM. While the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and ATPase activity assays demonstrated that the representative compound C20 is a potent inhibitor of TRIP13, C20 also showed good antitumor activity in vivo on BALB/c nude mice xenografted with MM tumor cells. An initial structure-activity study showed that the carbonyl group is crucial for anticancer activity. Overall, this study provided novel 1-amido-2-one-4-thio-deoxypyranoses, which are entirely different from previously reported potent inhibitor structures of TRIP13, and thus would aid the development of carbohydrate-based novel agents in MM pharmacotherapy.

Isatuximab for Delayed Red Cell Engraftment after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Isatuximab is an IgG1κ-derived monoclonal antibody against CD38 approved for the treatment of adult patients with multiple myeloma. Here we describe the successful treatment of a therapy-refractory pure red cell aplasia case following ABO-mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantation with isatuximab. Our patient was a 75-year-old female with acute myeloid leukemia who received an HLA-B antigen mismatched, unrelated peripheral blood stem cell transplant with a major ABO incompatibility (blood group A+ in the donor and blood group O+ in the recipient). The patient developed persistent red cell aplasia and anti-A antibodies for more than 500 days from transplant. She received therapy with rituximab, bortezomib, prednisone, and darbepoetin alfa with partial to no response. After repeated insurance denials for daratumumab, isatuximab was obtained from the manufacturer through their CareASSIST program. Following the completion of 2 cycles of isatuximab (8 doses), significant and sustained red cell recovery was observed.

Comprehensive approaches to preclinical evaluation of monoclonal antibodies and their next-generation derivatives

Biotherapeutics hold great promise for the treatment of several diseases and offer innovative possibilities for new treatments that target previously unaddressed medical needs. Despite successful transitions from preclinical to clinical stages and regulatory approval, there are instances where adverse reactions arise, resulting in product withdrawals. As a result, it is essential to conduct thorough evaluations of safety and effectiveness on an individual basis. This article explores current practices, challenges, and future approaches in conducting comprehensive preclinical assessments to ensure the safety and efficacy of biotherapeutics including monoclonal antibodies, toxin-conjugates, bispecific antibodies, single-chain antibodies, Fc-engineered antibodies, antibody mimetics, and siRNA-antibody/peptide conjugates.

Engineered polyspecific antibodies: A new frontier in the field of immunotherapeutics

The 21st-century beginning remarked with the huge success of monospecific MAbs, however, in the last couple of years, polyspecific MAbs (PsAbs) have been an interesting topic and show promise of being biobetter than monospecific MAbs. Polyspecificity, in which a single antibody serves multiple specific target binding, has been hypothesized to contribute to the development of a highly effective antibody repertoire for immune defence. This polyspecific MAb trend represents an explosion that is gripping the whole pharmaceutical industry. This review is concerned with the current development and quality enforcement of PsAbs. All provided literature on monospecific MAbs and polyspecific MAbs (PsAbs) were searched using various electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Elsevier, Springer, ACS, Google Patent and books via the keywords Antibody engineering, Polyspecific antibody, Conventional antibody, non-conventional antibody, and Single domain antibody. In the literature, there are more than 100 different formats to construct PsAb by quadroma technology, chemical conjugation and genetic engineering. Till March 2023, nine PsAb have been approved around the world, and around 330 are in advanced developmental stages, showing the dominancy of PsAb in the growing health sector. Recent advancements in protein engineering techniques and the fusion of non-conventional antibodies have made it possible to create complex PsAbs that demonstrate higher stability and enhanced potency. This marks the most significant achievement for cancer immunotherapy, in which PsAbs have immense promise. It is worth mentioning that seven out of the nine PsAbs have been approved as anti-cancer therapy. As PsAbs continue to acquire prominence, they could pave the way for the development of novel immunotherapies for multiple diseases.

Role of Immune Cells and Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma

The clinical signs of multiple myeloma, a plasma cell (PC) dyscrasia, include bone loss, renal damage, and paraproteinemia. It can be defined as the uncontrolled growth of malignant PCs within the bone marrow. The distinctive bone marrow milieu that regulates the progression of myeloma disease involves interactions between plasma and stromal cells, and myeloid and lymphoid cells. These cells affect the immune system independently or because of a complicated web of interconnections, which promotes disease development and immune evasion. Due to the importance of these factors in the onset of disease, various therapeutic strategies have been created that either target or improve the immunological processes that influence disease progression. The immune system has a role in the mechanism of action of multiple myeloma treatments. The main contributions of immune cells to the bone marrow microenvironment, as well as how they interact and how immune regulation might lead to therapeutic effects, are covered in this study.

Isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone immediately after failing of the quadruplet Daratumumab-bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Dara-VRD): Striking response with no washout in a newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Biochemical evolution of serum IgG-Kappa monoclonal component during the first line with VRD (x1), DARA-VRD (x4), and the second line with ISA-KD (x4).

Emerging Therapies for Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Despite the advances in immunosuppressive medications, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) continues to be a major cause of kidney allograft failure and remains a barrier to improving long-term allograft survival. Recently, there have been significant advances in the understanding of the pathophysiological process of AMR, along with the development of new therapeutic options. Additionally, surveillance protocols with donor-derived cell-free DNA and gene profile testing have been established, leading to the early detection of AMR. A multitude of clinical trials are ongoing, opening numerous opportunities for improving outcome in kidney transplant recipients. In this brief review, we discuss the emerging therapies for managing both active and chronic active AMR and highlight the ongoing clinical trials.

Incidence of second primary malignancies in patients with multiple myeloma receiving anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are commonly used for treating newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (r/r) multiple myeloma (MM). However, concerns have been raised about the occurrence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in patients receiving anti-CD38 mAbs. Assessing the safety data for rare adverse events like SPMs is challenging because individual clinical trials are typically focused on the primary endpoint. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2005 and April 2022, including patients with newly diagnosed or r/r MM. Our aim was to compare SPM rate with the use of anti-CD38 mAb-based regimens with other anti-myeloma regimens. After a median follow-up of 35.3 months (range: 8.2-56.2), we found that exposure to anti-CD38 mAbs was associated with an increased risk of developing SPMs compared to the control group (6.8% vs. 5.2%; Peto odds ratio [OR]: 1.53 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-1.95]; I²= 0%, p-value for heterogeneity= 0.44). This increased risk was primarily driven by non-melanoma cutaneous cancers (92 vs. 47; Peto OR: 1.77 [95% CI: 1.25-2.51]; I² = 0%, p-value for heterogeneity = 0.54). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of solid tumors (including malignant melanoma) (OR: 1.28 [95% CI: 0.85-1.95]) or hematologic SPMs (OR: 1.86; [95% CI: 0.81-4.27]). In conclusion, the use of anti-CD38 mAb-based combination regimens is associated with a higher risk of non-invasive cutaneous SPMs, but not solid tumors or hematologic SPMs. The increased occurrence of non-invasive cutaneous SPMs may be due to enhanced monitoring resulting from longer treatment duration with anti-CD38 mAbs.

Biological research on the occurrence and development of multiple myeloma and its treatment

INTRODUCTION

To review the pathogenesis and treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). MM is a hematological malignancy with abnormal plasma cell proliferation in bone marrow. Due to the emergence of drug resistance, MM is still an incurable malignancy, which requires further exploration of pathogenesis and effective therapeutic targets.

METHODS

In this paper, the method of literature review is adopted to obtain the information about MM. Based on the literature, comprehensive and systematic review is made.

RESULTS

MM is a complex pathophysiological process with great heterogeneity, mainly reflected in genomic instability and bone marrow microenvironment. At present, the treatment of MM has made great progress, proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs are widely used in clinic. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation may be the only promising cure for MM, and its high transplant-related mortality limits its clinical application.

CONCLUSIONS

The future of MM treatment lies in the development of more targeted therapies, novel immunotherapies, and a better understanding of the disease's molecular and genetic basis.

Consensus for Flow Cytometry Clinical Report on Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Harmonization Process Merging Laboratory Experience and Clinical Needs

Flow cytometry is a highly sensitive and specific approach for discriminating between normal and clonal plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Uniform response criteria after treatment have been established by the International Myeloma Working Group and the EuroFlow Group; however, the way in which flow cytometry data are reported has suffered from no collaborative or multicentre efforts. This study, involving 8 expert laboratories and 12 clinical hematology units of the Lazio region in Italy, aims to produce a uniform and shared report among the various Centres. From the pre-analytical phase to sample processing, data acquisition, analysis, and evaluation of the potential limitations and pitfalls of the entire process, the study reaches a final conclusion shared by laboratories and clinicians according to the most updated principles and recommendations. The aim was to identify the necessary data to be included in the clinical report by using multiple-choice questionnaires at every single stage of the process. An agreement of more than 75% of the laboratories was considered mandatory for the data to be included in the report. By ensuring the operational autonomy of each laboratory, this study provides a clear report that limits subjective interpretations and highlights possible bias in the process, better supporting clinical decision-making.

Therapeutic Antibodies in Cancer Treatment in the UK

The growing understanding of the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis accelerated the development of monoclonal therapeutic antibodies to specifically target multiple cancer pathways. Recombinant protein therapeutics now constitute a large proportion of yearly approved medicines. Oncology, autoimmune diseases and to a smaller degree the prophylaxis of organ transplant rejection are their main application areas. As of the date of this review, 37 monoclonal antibody products are approved for use in cancer treatments in the United Kingdom. Currently, the antibody therapeutics market is dominated by monoclonal immunoglobulins (IgGs). New types of recombinant antibody therapeutics developed more recently include bispecific recombinant antibodies and other recombinantly produced functional proteins. This review focuses on the approved therapeutic antibodies used in cancer treatment in the UK today and describes their antigen targets and molecular mechanisms involved. We provide convenient links to the relevant databases and other relevant resources for all antigens and antibodies mentioned. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the different monoclonal antibodies that are currently in clinical use primarily in malignancy, including their function, which is of importance to those in the medical field and allied specialties.

Development of therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of diseases

Since the first monoclonal antibody drug, muromonab-CD3, was approved for marketing in 1986, 165 antibody drugs have been approved or are under regulatory review worldwide. With the approval of new drugs for treating a wide range of diseases, including cancer and autoimmune and metabolic disorders, the therapeutic antibody drug market has experienced explosive growth. Monoclonal antibodies have been sought after by many biopharmaceutical companies and scientific research institutes due to their high specificity, strong targeting abilities, low toxicity, side effects, and high development success rate. The related industries and markets are growing rapidly, and therapeutic antibodies are one of the most important research and development areas in the field of biology and medicine. In recent years, great progress has been made in the key technologies and theoretical innovations provided by therapeutic antibodies, including antibody-drug conjugates, antibody-conjugated nuclides, bispecific antibodies, nanobodies, and other antibody analogs. Additionally, therapeutic antibodies can be combined with technologies used in other fields to create new cross-fields, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), CAR-natural killer cells (CAR-NK), and other cell therapy. This review summarizes the latest approved or in regulatory review therapeutic antibodies that have been approved or that are under regulatory review worldwide, as well as clinical research on these approaches and their development, and outlines antibody discovery strategies that have emerged during the development of therapeutic antibodies, such as hybridoma technology, phage display, preparation of fully human antibody from transgenic mice, single B-cell antibody technology, and artificial intelligence-assisted antibody discovery.

Immunotherapy approaches for hematological cancers

Hematological cancers such as leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma have traditionally been treated with chemo and radiotherapy approaches. Introduction of immunotherapies for treatment of these diseases has led to patient remissions that would not have been possible with traditional approaches. In this critical review we identify main disease characteristics, symptoms, and current treatment options. Five common immunotherapies, namely checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, cell-based therapies, antibodies, and oncolytic viruses, are described, and their applications in hematological cancers are critically discussed.

Mature B‐ and plasma‐cell flow cytometric analysis: A review of the impact of targeted therapy

Flow cytometry has been indispensable in diagnosing B cell lymphoma and plasma cell neoplasms. The advances in novel multicolor flow cytometry have also made this technology a robust tool for monitoring minimal/measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma. However, challenges using conventional gating strategies to isolate neoplastic B or plasma cells are emerging due to the rapidly increasing number of antibody therapeutics targeting single or multiple classic B/plasma cell-lineage markers, such as CD19, CD20, and CD22 in B cells and CD38 in plasma cells. This review is the first of a two-part series that summarizes the most current targeted therapies used in B and plasma cell neoplasms and proposes detailed alternative approaches to overcome post-targeted therapy analysis challenges by flow cytometry. The second review in this series (Chen et al.) focuses on challenges encountered in the use of targeted therapy in precursor B cell neoplasms.

Cumulative Incidence and Relative Risk of Infection in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody-Based Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple myeloma are at higher risk for infections due to disease pathogenesis and administered therapies. The purpose of this study was to estimate the risk for any grade and severe infections associated with the use of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in patients with multiple myeloma.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included patients with multiple myeloma who received CD38-targeting monoclonal antibody regimens and reported outcomes of infection and performed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the relative risk for infections.

RESULTS

After screening 673 citations, we retrieved 17 studies providing data on 11 RCTs. Overall, the included reports evaluated 5316 patients (2797 in the intervention arm and 2519 in the control arm). The relative risk (RR) for both any grade or severe infections was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.17-1.37 and 1.14-1.41, respectively). The cumulative incidence of any grade infections for patients who received anti-CD38 agents was 77% (95% CI, 68%-86%), while for severe infections it was 28% (95% CI, 23%-34%). Patients treated with anti-CD38 agents had a 39% higher risk for any grade pneumonia (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.12-1.72) and a 38% higher risk for severe pneumonia (RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09-1.75). For upper respiratory tract infections, the relative risk was 1.51 and 1.71 for any grade and severe infections, respectively. Regarding varicella-zoster virus (VZV) reactivation, we found no evidence of increased risk (RR, 3.86; 95% CI, 0.66-22.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with multiple myeloma treated with regimens that included an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody were at higher risk for any grade or severe infections without an associated higher mortality rate during the follow-up period of the retrieved studies. No evidence of increased risk for VZV reactivation was noted, but there was a significant association between CD38-targeting treatment and pneumonia risk. Increased surveillance for infections, development of effective prophylactic strategies, and studies with long follow-up are needed for patients with multiple myeloma treated with anti-CD38-based regimens.

Pathways of Angiogenic and Inflammatory Cytokines in Multiple Myeloma: Role in Plasma Cell Clonal Expansion and Drug Resistance

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy, and despite the introduction of innovative therapies, remains an incurable disease. Identifying early and minimally or non-invasive biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses is an active field of investigation. Malignant plasma cells (PCs) reside in the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment (BMME) which comprises cells (e.g., tumour, immune, stromal cells), components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and vesicular and non-vesicular (soluble) molecules, all factors that support PCs’ survival and proliferation. The interaction between PCs and BM stromal cells (BMSCs), a hallmark of MM progression, is based not only on intercellular interactions but also on autocrine and paracrine circuits mediated by soluble or vesicular components. In fact, PCs and BMSCs secrete various cytokines, including angiogenic cytokines, essential for the formation of specialized niches called “osteoblastic and vascular niches”, thus supporting neovascularization and bone disease, vital processes that modulate the pathophysiological PCs–BMME interactions, and ultimately promoting disease progression. Here, we aim to discuss the roles of cytokines and growth factors in pathogenetic pathways in MM and as prognostic and predictive biomarkers. We also discuss the potential of targeted drugs that simultaneously block PCs’ proliferation and survival, PCs–BMSCs interactions and BMSCs activity, which may represent the future goal of MM therapy.

Investigational drugs for the treatment of kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant rejection remains an important clinical problem despite the development of effective immunosuppressive drug combination therapy. Two major types of rejection are recognized, namely T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), which have a different pathophysiology and are treated differently. Unfortunately, long-term outcomes of both TCMR and ABMR remain unsatisfactory despite current therapy. Hence, alternative therapeutic drugs are urgently needed.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers novel and investigational drugs for the pharmacological treatment of kidney transplant rejection. Potential therapeutic strategies and future directions are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of alternative pharmacologic treatment of rejection has focused mostly on ABMR, since this is the leading cause of kidney allograft loss and currently lacks an effective, evidence-based therapy. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence for any of the covered investigational drugs to support their use in ABMR. However, with the emergence of targeted therapies, this potential arises for individualized treatment strategies. In order to generate more high-quality evidence for such strategies and overcome the obstacles of classic, randomized, controlled trials, we advocate the implementation of adaptive trial designs and surrogate clinical endpoints. We believe such adaptive trial designs could help to understand the risks and benefits of promising drugs such as tocilizumab, clazakizumab, belimumab, and imlifidase.

Roadmap for new practitioners to navigate the multiple myeloma landscape

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a blood cancer in which monoclonal plasma cells cause end organ damage resulting in hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, and bone lesions. MM is considered incurable, however, recent advances in treatment have improved survival. Historically, MM has been treated with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteosome inhibitors (PIs), and corticosteroids. While newer therapeutic approaches such as monoclonal antibodies and cellular therapies have broadened the treatment horizon, the selection and sequencing of these therapies has become more complex. This review aims to help advanced practice providers navigate through the diagnosis, staging, treatment, and supportive care considerations in the MM space.

An update on novel multiple myeloma targets

Introduction: despite therapeutic progress, leading to a significant improvement of outcome, multiple myeloma (MM) remains a difficult to treat hematologic disease due to its biological heterogeneity and clinical complexity.

Areas covered: Treatment of patients refractory and resistant to all classes of agents used in newly diagnosed MM, is becoming a relevant problem for every hematologist. New generation immunotherapies, such as conjugated mAb, bispecific mAbs and CAR-T cells, targeting novel molecules as BCMA, have showed relevant results in very advanced MM. In the same setting, small molecules, such as selinexor and melflufen, also proved to be effective. We are currently waiting for the results of under evaluation personalized therapy, directed against specific gene mutations or signaling pathways, responsible for disease progression.

Expert Opinion: In the near future, many therapeutic strategies will become available for MM and the challenge will be to position each approach in order to cure, maintaining a good quality of life in these patients.

The Use of Oncolytic Viruses in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

Simple Summary

Multiple myeloma is a type of blood cancer caused by the uncontrolled growth of antibody producing B cells (known as plasma cells) that reside in the bone marrow. It is classed as a largely incurable cancer as whilst patients respond well to initial chemotherapy treatments, unfortunately after periods of disease remission, relapse usually occurs with the emergence of chemotherapy resistance. Therefore, there is a need for new approaches that not only reduce tumour load but also prevent tumour relapse. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) (tumour killing viruses) are being explored as a therapy for various cancers, including multiple myeloma. This review discusses the use of OVs in myeloma in preclinical model systems and early phase clinical trials, and discusses some of the hurdles involved in the translation to myeloma patients.

Abstract

Multiple myeloma accounts for 1% of all new cancers worldwide. It is the second most common haematological malignancy and has a low five-year survival rate (53.2%). Myeloma remains an incurable disease and is caused by the growth of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow. Current anti-myeloma therapies (conventional chemotherapies, immunomodulatory drugs i.e., thalidomide and its’ analogues, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and radiotherapy) initially substantially debulk tumour burden, but after a period of remission ‘plateau phase’ disease invariably relapses due to tumour recrudescence from foci of minimal residual disease (MRD) and accumulating drug resistance. Therefore, there is a compelling clinical need for the development of novel treatment regimens to target MRD and effectively eliminate all remaining tumour cells. This review will discuss the potential use of oncolytic virus (OV) therapies in the treatment of myeloma. Specifically, it will focus on preclinical studies using DNA viruses (adenovirus (Ad), vaccinia virus (VV), myxoma virus (MYXV), and herpes simplex virus (HSV)), RNA viruses (reovirus (reo), coxsackie virus, measles virus (MV) and bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV), and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)), and on four types of viruses (VV, reo, MV-NIS and VSV-IFNβ-NIS) that have been assessed clinically in a small number of myeloma patients.