A comparison between time to clinical stability in community-acquired aspiration pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia

Microbiological etiology of aspiration pneumonia in Japan: Insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anaerobic bacteria were historically considered the primary causative agent of aspiration pneumonia. However, recent studies suggest their role may have been overemphasized, and the microbial profile of aspiration pneumonia remains uncertain owing to diagnostic limitations. This study explored its microbiological epidemiology through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched for English and Japanese articles published since 1990, evaluating the etiological bacterial species associated with aspiration pneumonia using PubMed and Ichushi-Web databases. The detection frequency (%) of each bacterial species was calculated using Review Manager and analyzed separately for Japan and other countries. Regional differences in detection of bacteria between these countries were also compared.

RESULTS

This study included 21 articles: 14 from Japan and 7 from other countries. The most prevalent bacteria were Streptococcus pneumoniae (11.7 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 8.5-15.0 %) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.8 %, 95 % CI: 2.5-21.1 %), respectively. Gram-negative bacteria such as K. pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were frequently detected, whereas oral streptococci and anaerobic bacteria were uncommon in both regions. Significant regional differences were observed in the detection frequencies of Staphylococcus aureus, S. pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the bacterial profile of aspiration pneumonia and clarified the current understanding, showing that S. pneumoniae and gram-negative bacteria were frequently detected in aspiration pneumonia, whereas anaerobes and oral streptococci were less commonly identified. However, further investigation is needed to better characterize the bacterial spectrum, as a standardized definition of aspiration pneumonia and the pathogenicity of detected microbes remains uncertain.

Dysphagia after Stroke: An Unmet Antibiotic Stewardship Opportunity

The goal of antibiotic stewardship is to improve antibiotic use, often by reducing unnecessary treatment. Bedside dysphagia screening tools help identify patients at high risk of aspiration following stroke. Presence of dysphagia does not indicate a need for antibiotic treatment. Therefore, this retrospective, cohort study was developed to evaluate the association of dysphagia and antibiotic prescribing following stroke. There were 117 patients included. Patients were placed into 2 cohorts based on the results of the dysphagia screening, with 55 patients positive for dysphagia and 62 patients negative for dysphagia. Patients with dysphagia tended to be older, had higher National Institutes of Health stroke scores, and lower renal function. Patients with dysphagia were prescribed more empiric antibiotics than those without dysphagia (18.2% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.01). This resulted in 53 antibiotic days of therapy in the dysphagia cohort compared to 19 antibiotic days of therapy in the no dysphagia cohort (p = 0.1). No patients later developed pneumonia and only one patient was started antibiotics after 48 h. Two cases of Clostridioides difficile were reported. Both patients were in the dysphagia cohort and received antibiotics. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that positive chest x-ray findings and failed dysphagia screen were independent conditions associated with initiating antibiotics. These findings indicate that antibiotic use was higher in patients following stroke with a positive dysphagia screen. Close monitoring of stroke patients, particularly when positive for dysphagia, might be an under-recognized antibiotic stewardship opportunity.

Oral meal intake as a prognostic predictor of community-acquired pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The association between oral intake volume and prognosis has not been studied in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 503 hospitalized CAP patients to evaluate whether early-phase meal intake (EMI) (within the first 24 h after hospitalization) and maximum meal intake (MMI) (on the day during hospitalization) are useful prognostic predictors.

RESULTS

Of the 503 patients, 40 (8.0%) died within 30 days. Area under the curve (AUC) for prognosis was comparable between EMI, A-DROP, and serum albumin [EMI: 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.84; A-DROP: 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83; Serum albumin: 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.79]. Mortality rate was <1% in patients with EMI ≥ 50%. Univariate analysis showed that patients with EMI < 50% showed poor prognosis [odds ratio 53.4, 95% CI 7.2-392.2]. Multivariate analysis showed that EMI was an independent prognostic predictor [odds ratio 23.6, 95% CI 3.11-179.7]. AUC of MMI for prognosis was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96); mortality rate was <1% for patients who ingested ≥50% of meals on any day during hospitalization. We defined ingesting ≥50% of meals on any day during hospitalization as oral intake stability. Multivariate analyses revealed an association between oral intake stability and prognosis. Odds ratio of oral intake stability for prognosis was higher than that of conventional evaluations (vital sign and CRP level stability). Fewer days were required to reach oral intake stability than to reach vital sign and CRP level stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral intake is a simple, non-invasive, cost-free, and powerful prognostic predictor for patients with CAP.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America

Background: This document provides evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the management of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Methods: A multidisciplinary panel conducted pragmatic systematic reviews of the relevant research and applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology for clinical recommendations.

Results: The panel addressed 16 specific areas for recommendations spanning questions of diagnostic testing, determination of site of care, selection of initial empiric antibiotic therapy, and subsequent management decisions. Although some recommendations remain unchanged from the 2007 guideline, the availability of results from new therapeutic trials and epidemiological investigations led to revised recommendations for empiric treatment strategies and additional management decisions.

Conclusions: The panel formulated and provided the rationale for recommendations on selected diagnostic and treatment strategies for adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Prognostic implications of aspiration pneumonia in patients with community acquired pneumonia: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Aspiration pneumonia is thought to be associated with a poor outcome in patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, there has been no systematic review regarding the impact of aspiration pneumonia on the outcomes in patients with CAP. This review was conducted using the MOOSE guidelines: Patients: patients defined CAP. Exposure: aspiration pneumonia defined as pneumonia in patients who have aspiration risk. Comparison: confirmed pneumonia in patients who were not considered to be at high risk for oral aspiration. Outcomes: mortality, hospital readmission or recurrent pneumonia. Three investigators independently identified published cohort studies from PubMed, CENTRAL database, and EMBASE. Nineteen studies were included for this systematic review. Aspiration pneumonia increased in-hospital mortality (relative risk, 3.62; 95% CI, 2.65–4.96; P < 0.001, seven studies) and 30-day mortality (3.57; 2.18–5.86; P < 0.001, five studies). In contrast, aspiration pneumonia was associated with decreased ICU mortality (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.26–0.60; P < 0.00001, four studies). Although there are insufficient data to perform a meta-analysis on long-term mortality, recurrent pneumonia, and hospital readmission, the few reported studies suggest that aspiration pneumonia is also associated with these poor outcomes. In conclusion, aspiration pneumonia was associated with both higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality in patients with CAP outside ICU settings.

Time to clinical stability among children hospitalized with pneumonia

We evaluated the performance of time to clinical stability (TCS), a longitudinal outcome measure using 4 physiologic parameters (temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and use of supplemental oxygen), among children enrolled in a prospective study of pneumonia hospitalizations. We calculated the time from admission to normalization for each of the 4 parameters individually along with various combinations of these parameters (≥2 parameters). We assessed for agreement between the combined TCS measures and both hospital length of stay and an ordinal severity scale (nonsevere, severe, and very severe). Overall, 323 (96.7%) of 334 included children had ≥1 parameter abnormal on admission; 70 (21%) children had ≥1 parameter abnormal at discharge. For the 4 combined measures, median TCS decreased with increasing age. Increasing TCS was associated with both longer length of stay and increasing disease severity. The simplest combined measure incorporating only respiratory rate and need for supplemental oxygen performed similarly to more complex measures including additional parameters. Our study demonstrates that longitudinal TCS measures may be useful in children with pneumonia, both in clinical settings to assess recovery and readiness for discharge, and as an outcome measure in research and quality assessments. Additional study is needed to further validate our findings.

Community-acquired pneumonia and tuberculosis: differential diagnosis and the use of fluoroquinolones

The respiratory fluoroquinolones moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and high-dose levofloxacin are recommended in guidelines for effective empirical antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The use of these antibiotics for this indication in areas with a high prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) has been questioned due to the perception that they contribute both to delays in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB and to the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In this review, we consider some of the important questions regarding the potential use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of CAP where the burden of TB is high. The evidence suggests that the use of fluoroquinolones as recommended for 5-10 days as empirical treatment for CAP, according to current clinical management guidelines, is appropriate even in TB-endemic regions. It is critical to quickly exclude M. tuberculosis as a cause of CAP using the most rapid relevant diagnostic investigations in the management of all patients with CAP.