LDL Apheresis and Lp (a) Apheresis: A Clinician's Perspective

2024: The year in cardiovascular disease - the year of lipoprotein(a). Research advances and new findings

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels, which occur in as many as 1.5 billion people worldwide, are an independent and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve disease. Unlike low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Lp(a) levels are approximately 70-90% genetically determined. Currently, no approved pharmacological therapies specifically target lowering Lp(a) concentrations. Several drugs, mainly RNA-based therapies, that specifically and potently lower Lp(a), are under investigation. Three of these new therapeutic agents are advancing through clinical development to evaluate whether reducing Lp(a) levels can decrease cardiovascular risk. The outcomes of these trials could potentially transform cardiovascular disease prevention strategies; however, once approved, the drugs will likely be used for secondary prevention, and ongoing strategies for managing elevated Lp(a) in primary prevention will be important. Lipoprotein(a) research is a rapidly evolving field, but unanswered questions remain concerning the physiological function of Lp(a) and its true pathogenic mechanisms. This review of Lp(a) research focuses on new findings and clinical trial results that appeared in 2024.

Achieving More Optimal Lipid Control with Non-Statin Lipid Lowering Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of statins has transformed approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, many patients remain at a major risk of experiencing cardiovascular events, due to a range of factors including suboptimal control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Accordingly, there is an ongoing need to develop additional strategies, beyond the use of statins, to achieve more effective reductions in cardiovascular risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genomic studies have implicated the causal role of LDL in atherosclerosis and identified that polymorphisms influencing factors involved in lipid metabolism influence both the level of LDL-C and cardiovascular risk. These findings have highlighted the potential for cardiovascular benefit from development of therapies targeting these factors and incremental benefit when used in combination with statins. Clinical trials have demonstrated that these new agents have favourable effects on both atherosclerotic plaque and cardiovascular events. Additional work has sought to improve intensification of statin therapy and adherence with lipid lowering therapy, to achieve more effective cardiovascular prevention via lipid lowering. Emerging therapies, beyond statins, have the potential to optimise lipid levels and play an effective role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Oral Muvalaplin for Lowering of Lipoprotein(a): A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Muvalaplin inhibits lipoprotein(a) formation. A 14-day phase 1 study demonstrated that muvalaplin was well tolerated and reduced lipoprotein(a) levels up to 65%. The effect of longer administration of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels in individuals at high cardiovascular risk remains uncertain.

Objectives

To determine the effect of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels and to assess safety and tolerability.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial enrolling 233 participants with lipoprotein(a) concentrations of 175 nmol/L or greater with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or familial hypercholesterolemia at 43 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and the United States between December 10, 2022, and November 22, 2023.

Interventions

Participants were randomized to receive orally administered muvalaplin at dosages of 10 mg/d (n = 34), 60 mg/d (n = 64), or 240 mg/d (n = 68) or placebo (n = 67) for 12 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the placebo-adjusted percentage change from baseline in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration at week 12, using an assay to measure intact lipoprotein(a) and a traditional apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Secondary end points included the percentage change in apolipoprotein B and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Results

The median age of study participants was 66 years; 33% were female; and 27% identified as Asian, 4% as Black, and 66% as White. Muvalaplin resulted in placebo-adjusted reductions in lipoprotein(a) of 47.6% (95% CI, 35.1%-57.7%), 81.7% (95% CI, 78.1%-84.6%), and 85.8% (95% CI, 83.1%-88.0%) for the 10-mg/d, 60-mg/d, and 240-mg/d dosages, respectively, using an intact lipoprotein(a) assay and 40.4% (95% CI, 28.3%-50.5%), 70.0% (95% CI, 65.0%-74.2%), and 68.9% (95% CI, 63.8%-73.3%) using an apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Dose-dependent reductions in apolipoprotein B were observed at 8.9% (95% CI, -2.2% to 18.8%), 13.1% (95% CI, 4.4%-20.9%), and 16.1% (95% CI, 7.8%-23.7%) at 10 mg/d, 60 mg/d, and 240 mg/d, respectively. No change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was observed. No safety or tolerability concerns were observed at any dosage.

Conclusions and Relevance

Muvalaplin reduced lipoprotein(a) measured using intact lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a)-based assays and was well tolerated. The effect of muvalaplin on cardiovascular events requires further investigation.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05563246.

The functions of apolipoproteins and lipoproteins in health and disease

Lipoproteins and apolipoproteins are crucial in lipid metabolism, functioning as essential mediators in the transport of cholesterol and triglycerides and being closely related to the pathogenesis of multiple systems, including cardiovascular. Lipoproteins a (Lp(a)), as a unique subclass of lipoproteins, is a low-density lipoprotein(LDL)-like particle with pro-atherosclerotic and pro-inflammatory properties, displaying high heritability. More and more strong evidence points to a possible link between high amounts of Lp(a) and cardiac conditions like atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis (AS), making it a risk factor for heart diseases. In recent years, Lp(a)'s role in other diseases, including neurological disorders and cancer, has been increasingly recognized. Although therapies aimed at low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) have achieved significant success, elevated Lp(a) levels remain a significant clinical management problem. Despite the limited efficacy of current lipid-lowering therapies, major clinical advances in new Lp(a)-lowering therapies have significantly advanced the field. This review, grounded in the pathophysiology of lipoproteins, seeks to summarize the wide-ranging connections between lipoproteins (such as LDL-C and HDL-C) and various diseases, alongside the latest clinical developments, special emphasis is placed on the pivotal role of Lp(a) in cardiovascular disease, while also examining its future potential and mechanisms in other conditions. Furthermore, this review discusses Lp(a)-lowering therapies and highlights significant recent advances in emerging treatments, advocates for further exploration into Lp(a)'s pathogenic mechanisms and its potential as a therapeutic target, proposing new secondary prevention strategies for high-risk individuals.

Lomitapide: navigating cardiovascular challenges with innovative therapies

Dyslipidemia is the most significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) Secondary dyslipidemia: its treatments and association with atherosclerosis. Glob Health Med, Efficacy and safety of saroglitazar for the management of dyslipidemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies. The current treatment strategies for managing dyslipidemia focus on reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to minimize the risks of atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction (MI). Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an inherited autosomal dominant disease caused by a mutation in the LDL receptor (LDLr), which can lead to extremely high levels of LDL-C The Beneficial Effect of Lomitapide on the Cardiovascular System in LDLr(-/-) Mice with Obesity, The microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor lomitapide improves vascular function in mice with obesity. Although statin therapy has been the primary treatment for dyslipidemia, HoFH patients do not respond well to statins, requiring alternative therapies. Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) inhibition has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for treating HoFH. MTP is primarily responsible for transferring triglyceride and other lipids into apolipoprotein B (ApoB) during the assembly of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles in the liver. Lomitapide, an inhibitor of MTP, has been approved for treatingof HoFH adults. Unlike statins, lomitapide does not act on the LDLr to reduce cholesterol. Instead, lomitapide lowers the levels of ApoB-containing proteins, primarily VLDL, eventually decreasing LDL-C levels. Studies have shown that lomitapide can reduce LDL-C levels by more than 50% in patients with HoFH who have failed to respond adequately to other treatments. Lowering LDL-C levels is important for preventing atherosclerosis, reducing cardiovascular risk, improving endothelial function, and promoting overall cardiovascular health, especially for patients with HoFH Efficacy and safety of a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study. This review paper focuses on research findings regarding the therapeutic benefits of lomitapide, highlighting its effectiveness in lowering cholesterol levels and reducing the risk of CVDs The microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor lomitapide improves vascular function in mice with obesity.

Early-onset familial hypercholesterolemia: A case of extensive xanthomas and premature coronary artery disease

Key Clinical Message

Early recognition and management of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are crucial, especially in patients with extensive xanthomas and premature coronary artery disease. Prompt diagnosis and aggressive lipid-lowering therapy can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality rates. Careful clinical assessment in resource-limited settings is essential for optimal outcomes.

Abstract

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder that causes chronically elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Based on LDL levels, FH can be heterozygous or homozygous, further established through clinical features, laboratory findings, and genetic analysis. Elevated cholesterol levels cause atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and sudden death. Xanthomas are a clinical manifestation of FH that reveal the underlying systemic genetic disease. We present the case of a 47-year-old male with triple vessel coronary artery disease and widespread xanthomas, diagnosed with homozygous FH based on "The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Diagnostic Criteria for Familial Hypercholesterolemia." Lifelong therapy with lipid-lowering medications and lifestyle changes is necessary in such cases.

2024 Egyptian consensus statement on the role of non-statin therapies for LDL cholesterol lowering in different patient risk categories

BACKGROUND

The new millennium has witnessed increased understanding of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and improvement in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) management. The role of LDL cholesterol and other atherogenic lipid particles in the development of atherosclerosis is now beyond doubt.

MAIN BODY

Statins have been widely used and recommended in guidelines for preventing and managing ischemic events. However, statins have side effects, and many patients do not achieve their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. In recent years, non-statin lipid-lowering agents have gained increasing use as adjuncts to statins or as alternatives in patients who cannot tolerate statins. This consensus proposes a simple approach for initiating non-statin lipid-lowering therapy and provides evidence-based recommendations. Our key advancements include the identification of patients at extreme risk for CV events, the consideration of initial combination therapy of statin and ezetimibe in very high-risk and extreme-risk groups and the extended use of bempedoic acid in patients not reaching LDL-C targets especially in resource-limited settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this consensus statement provides valuable insights into the expanding field of non-statin therapies and offers practical recommendations to enhance CV care, specifically focusing on improving LDL-C control in Egypt. While these recommendations hold promise, further research and real-world data are needed for validation and refinement.

The Pleiotropic Effects of Lipid-Modifying Interventions: Exploring Traditional and Emerging Hypolipidemic Therapies

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease poses a significant global health issue, with dyslipidemia standing out as a major risk factor. In recent decades, lipid-lowering therapies have evolved significantly, with statins emerging as the cornerstone treatment. These interventions play a crucial role in both primary and secondary prevention by effectively reducing cardiovascular risk through lipid profile enhancements. Beyond their primary lipid-lowering effects, extensive research indicates that these therapies exhibit pleiotropic actions, offering additional health benefits. These include anti-inflammatory properties, improvements in vascular health and glucose metabolism, and potential implications in cancer management. While statins and ezetimibe have been extensively studied, newer lipid-lowering agents also demonstrate similar pleiotropic effects, even in the absence of direct cardiovascular benefits. This narrative review explores the diverse pleiotropic properties of lipid-modifying therapies, emphasizing their non-lipid effects that contribute to reducing cardiovascular burden and exploring emerging benefits for non-cardiovascular conditions. Mechanistic insights into these actions are discussed alongside their potential therapeutic implications.

Evinacumab in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: long-term safety and efficacy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by severely elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In the pivotal Phase 3 HoFH trial (NCT03399786), evinacumab significantly decreased LDL-C in patients with HoFH. This study assesses the long-term safety and efficacy of evinacumab in adult and adolescent patients with HoFH.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, Phase 3 trial (NCT03409744), patients aged ≥12 years with HoFH who were evinacumab-naïve or had previously received evinacumab in other trials (evinacumab-continue) received intravenous evinacumab 15 mg/kg every 4 weeks with stable lipid-lowering therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients (adults: n = 102; adolescents: n = 14) were enrolled, of whom 57 (49.1%) were female. Patients were treated for a median (range) duration of 104.3 (28.3-196.3) weeks. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were reported in 93 (80.2%) and 27 (23.3%) patients, respectively. Two (1.7%) deaths were reported (neither was considered related to evinacumab). Three (2.6%) patients discontinued due to TEAEs (none were considered related to evinacumab). From baseline to Week 24, evinacumab decreased mean LDL-C by 43.6% [mean (standard deviation, SD), 3.4 (3.2) mmol/L] in the overall population; mean LDL-C reduction in adults and adolescents was 41.7% [mean (SD), 3.2 (3.3) mmol/L] and 55.4% [mean (SD), 4.7 (2.5) mmol/L], respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of patients with HoFH, evinacumab was generally well tolerated and markedly decreased LDL-C irrespective of age and sex. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of evinacumab was sustained over the long term.

Comparison of double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) versus heparin-mediated extracorporeal LDL-precipitation (HELP)-apheresis in early-onset preeclampsia

OBJECTIVES

Preeclampsia (PE) is a major cause of maternal and fetal mortality, and preterm birth. Previous studies indicate that lipid-apheresis may prolong pregnancy, namely heparin-mediated extracorporeal LDL-precipitation (HELP)- and dextran sulfate cellulose (DSC)-apheresis. We now report on double membrane plasmapheresis (DFPP) in early-onset preeclampsia (eoPE).

STUDY DESIGN

Open pilot study assessing the prolongation of pregnancy in PE by lipoprotein-apheresis (DRKS00004527). Two women with eoPE were treated by DFPP and compared to a historical cohort of 6 patients with eoPE treated by HELP-apheresis (NCT01967355).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical outcome of mothers and babies and prolongation of pregnancies (time of admission to birth).

RESULTS

Patient 1 (33y; 22 + 5/7GW) received 4 DFPP. Delivery day 19; birthweight 270 g; weight at discharge 2134 g on day 132. Patient 2 (35y; 21 + 4/7GW) received 2 DFPP. Delivery day 19; birthweight 465 g; weight at discharge 2540 g on day 104. DFPP was well tolerated by both patients.

CONCLUSIONS

DFPP proved to be save and pregnancies remained stable as long as 19 days. Although babies were born very preterm both babies could finally be dismissed from hospital. No relevant clinical differences between DFPP and HELP-apheresis could be observed. Therefore, DFPP may extend the range of available apheresis techniques to prolong pregnancies in early-onset preeclampsia. However, further studies are necessary to gain more information. REGISTER: (DRKS00004527).

Targeting Lipoprotein(a): Can RNA Therapeutics Provide the Next Step in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease?

Numerous genetic and epidemiologic studies have demonstrated an association between elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) and cardiovascular disease. As a result, lowering Lp(a) levels is widely recognized as a promising strategy for reducing the risk of new-onset coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. Lp(a) consists of a low-density lipoprotein-like particle with covalently linked apolipoprotein A (apo[a]) and apolipoprotein B-100, which explains its pro-thrombotic, pro-inflammatory, and pro-atherogenic properties. Lp(a) serum concentrations are genetically determined by the apo(a) isoform, with shorter isoforms having a higher rate of particle synthesis. To date, there are no approved pharmacological therapies that effectively reduce Lp(a) levels. Promising treatment approaches targeting apo(a) expression include RNA-based drugs such as pelacarsen, olpasiran, SLN360, and lepodisiran, which are currently in clinical trials. In this comprehensive review, we provide a detailed overview of RNA-based therapeutic approaches and discuss the recent advances and challenges of RNA therapeutics specifically designed to reduce Lp(a) levels and thus the risk of cardiovascular disease.

ApoB100 and Atherosclerosis: What's New in the 21st Century?

ApoB is the main protein of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and is further divided into ApoB48 in the intestine and ApoB100 in the liver. Very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) is produced by the liver, contains ApoB100, and is metabolized into its remnants, intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). ApoB100 has been suggested to play a crucial role in the formation of the atherogenic plaque. Apart from being a biomarker of atherosclerosis, ApoB100 seems to be implicated in the inflammatory process of atherosclerosis per se. In this review, we will focus on the structure, the metabolism, and the function of ApoB100, as well as its role as a predictor biomarker of cardiovascular risk. Moreover, we will elaborate upon the molecular mechanisms regarding the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, and we will discuss the disorders associated with the APOB gene mutations, and the potential role of various drugs as therapeutic targets.

Major Facilitator Superfamily Domain Containing 5 Inhibition Reduces Lipoprotein(a) Uptake and Calcification in Valvular Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

High circulating levels of Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) increase the risk of atherosclerosis and calcific aortic valve disease, affecting millions of patients worldwide. Although atherosclerosis is commonly treated with low-density lipoprotein-targeting therapies, these do not reduce Lp(a) or risk of calcific aortic valve disease, which has no available drug therapies. Targeting Lp(a) production and catabolism may provide therapeutic benefit, but little is known about Lp(a) cellular uptake.

METHODS

Here, unbiased ligand-receptor capture mass spectrometry was used to identify MFSD5 (major facilitator superfamily domain containing 5) as a novel receptor/cofactor involved in Lp(a) uptake.

RESULTS

Reducing MFSD5 expression by a computationally identified small molecule or small interfering RNA suppressed Lp(a) uptake and calcification in primary human valvular endothelial and interstitial cells. MFSD5 variants were associated with aortic stenosis (P=0.027 after multiple hypothesis testing) with evidence suggestive of an interaction with plasma Lp(a) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

MFSD5 knockdown suppressing human valvular cell Lp(a) uptake and calcification, along with meta-analysis of MFSD5 variants associating with aortic stenosis, supports further preclinical assessment of MFSD5 in cardiovascular diseases, the leading cause of death worldwide.

Muvalaplin, an Oral Small Molecule Inhibitor of Lipoprotein(a) Formation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is associated with atherosclerotic disease and aortic stenosis. Lp(a) forms by bonding between apolipoprotein(a) (apo[a]) and apo B100. Muvalaplin is an orally administered small molecule that inhibits Lp(a) formation by blocking the apo(a)-apo B100 interaction while avoiding interaction with a homologous protein, plasminogen.

Objective

To determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic effects of muvalaplin.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 1 randomized, double-blind, parallel-design study enrolled 114 participants (55 assigned to a single-ascending dose; 59 assigned to a multiple-ascending dose group) at 1 site in the Netherlands.

Interventions

The single ascending dose treatment evaluated the effect of a single dose of muvalaplin ranging from 1 mg to 800 mg or placebo taken by healthy participants with any Lp(a) level. The multiple ascending dose treatment evaluated the effect of taking daily doses of muvalaplin (30 mg to 800 mg) or placebo for 14 days in patients with Lp(a) levels of 30 mg/dL or higher.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes included safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory pharmacodynamic biomarkers.

Results

Among 114 randomized (55 in the single ascending dose group: mean [SD] age, 29 [10] years, 35 females [64%], 2 American Indian or Alaska Native [4%], 50 White [91%], 3 multiracial [5%]; 59 in the multiple ascending dose group: mean [SD] age 32 [15] years; 34 females [58%]; 3 American Indian or Alaska Native [5%], 6 Black [10%], 47 White [80%], 3 multiracial [5%]), 105 completed the trial. Muvalaplin was not associated with tolerability concerns or clinically significant adverse effects. Oral doses of 30 mg to 800 mg for 14 days resulted in increasing muvalaplin plasma concentrations and half-life ranging from 70 to 414 hours. Muvalaplin lowered Lp(a) plasma levels within 24 hours after the first dose, with further Lp(a) reduction on repeated dosing. Maximum placebo-adjusted Lp(a) reduction was 63% to 65%, resulting in Lp(a) plasma levels less than 50 mg/dL in 93% of participants, with similar effects at daily doses of 100 mg or more. No clinically significant changes in plasminogen levels or activity were observed.

Conclusion

Muvalaplin, a selective small molecule inhibitor of Lp(a) formation, was not associated with tolerability concerns and lowered Lp(a) levels up to 65% following daily administration for 14 days. Longer and larger trials will be required to further evaluate safety, tolerability, and effect of muvalaplin on Lp(a) levels and cardiovascular outcomes.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04472676.

Are we seeing the light at the end of the tunnel for high lipoprotein(a)? Lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) attests to be of interest as a new lipoprotein target. However, Lp(a) was discovered in 1963 and since then was recognized as a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like lipoprotein with a structurally similar domain to plasminogen. We are increasingly recognizing the importance of Lp(a) and cardiovascular pathologies including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, aortic valve stenosis, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. However, we neither have a standardized measurement method nor an appropriate agent to intervene with this old threat that we have recognized for more than 50 years. Herein, we present an up-to-date review of our knowledge about Lp(a) covering measurement methods, its associates, and summary of the currently available therapies and emerging therapeutic agents for the management of high Lp(a) in the light of recent evidence and guideline recommendations

Case report: Therapy adherence, MTTP variants, and course of atheroma in two patients with HoFH on low-dose, long-term lomitapide therapy

Background: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare and devastating genetic condition characterized by extremely elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) leading to an increased risk of premature atherosclerosis. Patients with Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia mostly present with mutations in LDLR; however, herein, we present two cases with concomitant microsomal triglyceride transfer protein mutations, who showed different clinical courses and treatment adherence on long-term therapy with the new MTTP inhibitor lomitapide. Objectives: We aimed to present the possibility of preventing the progression of atherosclerotic burden with effective and safe LDL-C reduction in patients with Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia on low-dose lomitapide therapy and emphasize the role of treatment adherence in therapy success. Methods: We present two patients with phenotypically Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, a compound heterozygous woman and a simple homozygous man, both with LDLR and additional MTTP mutations, who were treated with the MTTP-inhibiting agent lomitapide, with different treatment compliances. The role of impulsivity was investigated through Barratt Impulsivity Scale 11, and the extent of the atherosclerotic burden was followed up using coronary artery calcium scoring, echocardiographic and sonographic findings, and, eventually, through a strict follow-up of laboratory parameters. The patients were on lomitapide for 8 and 5 years, respectively, with no adverse effects. Conclusion: When accompanied by good adherence to therapy, low-dose lomitapide on top of standard lipid-lowering therapy with decreased frequency of lipid apheresis prevented the progression of atherosclerotic burden. Non-compliance might occur due to patient impulsivity and non-adherence to a low-fat diet.

Current Treatment Options in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is the rare form of familial hypercholesterolemia causing extremely high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, leading to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in the first decades of life, if left untreated. Early diagnosis and effective lipid lowering therapy (LLT) are crucial for the prevention of early ASCVD in patients with HoFH. On-treatment LDL-C levels are the best predictor of survival. However, due to the absent or defective LDL-receptor activity, most individuals with HoFH are resistant to conventional LLT, that leads to LDL-C clearance by upregulating LDL-receptors. We are at the dawn of a new era of effective pharmacotherapies for HoFH patients, with new agents providing an LDL-receptor independent cholesterol reduction. In this context, the present review provides a summary of the currently available therapies and emerging therapeutic agents for the management of patients with HoFH, in light of recent evidence and guideline recommendations.

Comparison of plasma separation using centrifugation or filtration for MONET lipoprotein apheresis in patients with cardiovascular disease and severe dyslipidemia

INTRODUCTION

Homozygous or severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated lipoprotein(a) levels may be treated with membrane filtration. The MONET system (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany) involves plasma separation by centrifugation or filtration.

METHODS

Whether the method of plasma separation affects lipoprotein lowering and treatment safety was investigated in a single-center retrospective study.

RESULTS

The centrifugation-based plasma separation achieved a higher plasma flow and shorter time to treat 1 L of plasma (46.2 ± 8.6 min), than the filtration-based system (71.5 ± 40.0 min; p = 0.001). The mean reduction of LDL-cholesterol was 69% and 67% with centrifugation and filtration and was 75% for lipoprotein(a) with both plasma separation methods. A reduction of IgM by more than 60%, of albumin and total protein by approximately 20% and low frequency of side effects was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of lowering atherogenic lipoproteins was comparable with both plasma separation methods. Centrifugation was more time-efficient compared to filtration.

New algorithms for treating homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We reviewed current and future therapeutic options for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) and place this evidence in context of an adaptable treatment algorithm.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lowering LDL-C levels to normal in patients with HoFH is challenging, but a combination of multiple lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) is key. Patients with (near) absence of LDL receptor expression are most severely affected and frequently require regular lipoprotein apheresis on top of combined pharmacologic LLT. Therapies acting independently of the LDL receptor pathway, such as lomitapide and evinacumab, are considered game changers for many patients with HoFH, and may reduce the need for lipoprotein apheresis in future. Liver transplantation is to be considered a treatment option of last resort. Headway is being made in gene therapy strategies, either aiming to permanently replace or knock out key lipid-related genes, with first translational steps into humans being made. Cardiovascular disease risk management beyond LDL-C, such as residual Lp(a) or inflammatory risk, should be evaluated and addressed accordingly in HoFH.

SUMMARY

Hypercholesterolemia is notoriously difficult to control in most patients with HoFH, but multi-LLT, including newer drugs, allows reduction of LDL-C to levels unimaginable until a few years ago. Cost and availability of these new therapies are important future challenges to be addressed.

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia as a Predisposing Factor for Atherosclerosis

Lipid metabolism alterations are an important component of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. However, it is now clear that the atherogenesis process involves more than one mechanism, and more than one condition can predispose this condition. Multiple risk factors contribute to the atherosclerosis initiation and define its course. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is a disorder of lipid metabolism that often leads to atherosclerosis development. As is clear from the disease name, the hallmark is the increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in blood. This creates favourable conditions for atherogenesis. In this review, we briefly described the familial hypercholesterolaemia and summarized data on the relationship between familial hypercholesterolaemia and atherosclerosis.

Lipoprotein(a): Evidence for Role as a Causal Risk Factor in Cardiovascular Disease and Emerging Therapies

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an established risk factor for multiple cardiovascular diseases. Several lines of evidence including mechanistic, epidemiologic, and genetic studies support the role of Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis/calcific aortic valve disease (AS/CAVD). Limited therapies currently exist for the management of risk associated with elevated Lp(a), but several targeted therapies are currently in various stages of clinical development. In this review, we detail evidence supporting Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for ASCVD and AS/CAVD, and discuss approaches to managing Lp(a)-associated risk.

A Modern Approach to Dyslipidemia

Lipid disorders involving derangements in serum cholesterol, triglycerides, or both are commonly encountered in clinical practice and often have implications for cardiovascular risk and overall health. Recent advances in knowledge, recommendations, and treatment options have necessitated an updated approach to these disorders. Older classification schemes have outlived their usefulness, yielding to an approach based on the primary lipid disturbance identified on a routine lipid panel as a practical starting point. Although monogenic dyslipidemias exist and are important to identify, most individuals with lipid disorders have polygenic predisposition, often in the context of secondary factors such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. With regard to cardiovascular disease, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is essentially causal, and clinical practice guidelines worldwide have recommended treatment thresholds and targets for this variable. Furthermore, recent studies have established elevated triglycerides as a cardiovascular risk factor, whereas depressed high-density lipoprotein cholesterol now appears less contributory than was previously believed. An updated approach to diagnosis and risk assessment may include measurement of secondary lipid variables such as apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a), together with selective use of genetic testing to diagnose rare monogenic dyslipidemias such as familial hypercholesterolemia or familial chylomicronemia syndrome. The ongoing development of new agents-especially antisense RNA and monoclonal antibodies-targeting dyslipidemias will provide additional management options, which in turn motivates discussion on how best to incorporate them into current treatment algorithms.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Global Burden and Approaches

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common genetic metabolic disorder characterized by markedly elevated LDL-C levels from birth leading to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and premature deaths. The purpose of this review is to share the current knowledge in the diagnosis, risk estimation, and management of patients with FH in the light of recent evidence and guideline recommendations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent registries underscored the prevalence of FH as 1/200-250 translating to an almost 1500 million subjects suffering from FH worldwide. However, only a minority of FH patients are identified early and effectively treated. In most cases, mutations in the LDL-receptor (LDLR) gene and to a lesser degree in the apolipoprotein B-100 (APOB), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), and the LDL-receptor adaptor protein 1 (LDLRAP1) genes cause FH. Diagnostic scores such as Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria using clinical manifestations are helpful in identifying FH. Traditional risk factors and high lipoprotein(a) affect the course of the disease. Vascular ultrasound imaging and coronary calcium scoring are helpful for further risk estimation of these patients. Getting to LDL-C goals is possible with currently available treatments including statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors, as well as lipoprotein apheresis, lomitapide, and mipomersen in more severe phenotypes. Additionally, novel agents bempedoic acid, inclisiran, and evinacumab expanded the treatment choices for some patients with FH. Early diagnosis and initiation of LDL-C lowering are still required to achieve the greatest reduction in ASCVD morbidity and mortality in patients with FH. FH is a common genetic disorder characterized by markedly elevated LDL-C levels from birth onward, resulting in significantly increased risk for ASCVD. Despite major advances in our understanding of the disease and effective therapies, FH is still underdiagnosed and undertreated. Early initiation of LDL-C lowering by increased awareness of FH among the healthcare professionals, patients, and the public is necessary to achieve meaningful reduction in ASCVD morbidity and mortality in these patients.