Glycemic Management in the Operating Room: Screening, Monitoring, Oral Hypoglycemics, and Insulin Therapy

Using Diabetes Technology in Hospitalized Patients

There is an estimated 350,000 persons wearing an insulin pump and 2.4 million wearing a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) sensor in the United States. The last few decades have ushered in advancements with the integration of insulin delivery and continuous glucose evaluations which offer a more precise tight insulin delivery and glycemic control. However, when hospital admissions are necessary, most desire to continue to wear their devices. The last several decades and during the pandemic, many agencies such as the Joint Commission, FDA, and diabetes organizations have generated position statements and guidelines to allow the most optimal diabetes treatment, even when hospitalized.

Perioperative Management of the Patient with Diabetes Mellitus

Perioperative evaluation and management of diabetes mellitus is vital to minimize adverse complications before, during, and after surgery. It requires a multidisciplinary approach including the surgery team, anesthesia, endocrinology or internal medicine, and other specialties as needed. This article will discuss the effects of surgery and anesthesia on blood glucose, preoperative evaluation of the person with diabetes, glycemic targets for surgery, adjustment of diabetes medications the day before surgery, in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative areas, management of blood glucose in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods, and management of hypoglycemia.

Effects of Perioperative Glycemic Management Protocol on Glycemic Outcomes of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to reveal the effects of a glycemic control protocol directed by nurses during the perioperative period on glycemic outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study METHODS: The study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery of a research and training hospital in Turkey. The study included 47 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent elective major abdominal surgery between September 2017 and December 2018. The number of patients in the intervention and the control groups was 22 and 25, respectively. Routine clinical glycemic control was implemented in the control group, whereas a glycemic management protocol developed by a multidisciplinary team was implemented in the intervention group. We collected data on the control group first, followed by the introduction of the glycemic management protocol to clinical staff and glycemia data collection using the new protocol. Blood glucose (BG) levels in patients and the factors that may affect BG were measured in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. Data on glycemic control was also collected. Furthermore, we measured the satisfaction of the nurses implementing the glycemic management protocol.

FINDINGS

The rate of hyperglycemia in intensive care unit was 21% in the intervention group and 59% in the control group (P < .05). Time spent in the target BG range during insulin infusion was 76% in the intervention group and 35% in the control group (P < .05). The time required to achieve target BG range during insulin infusion was 6 hours for the intervention group and 15 hours for the control group, indicating that less time was required to achieve the target BG range in the intervention group (P < .05). Moreover, the insulin consumption rate in the intensive care unit was lower in the intervention group (P < .05). The satisfaction levels of the nurses that used the glycemic management protocol was 92.61 ± 7.93%.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study showed that the implementation of a glycemic management protocol by nurses for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery decreases the rate of hyperglycemia, insulin consumption rate, and the time required to achieve the targeted BG range during the perioperative period. Therefore, it is recommended to use a glycemia management protocol to control glycemia in patients during the surgical process.

Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia Updated Consensus Statement on Perioperative Blood Glucose Management in Adult Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery

This consensus statement is a comprehensive update of the 2010 Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA) Consensus Statement on perioperative blood glucose management in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing ambulatory surgery. Since the original consensus guidelines in 2010, several novel therapeutic interventions have been introduced to treat DM, including new hypoglycemic agents and increasing prevalence of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors. The updated recommendations were developed by an expert task force under the provision of SAMBA and are based on a comprehensive review of the literature from 1980 to 2022. The task force included SAMBA members with expertise on this topic and those contributing to the primary literature regarding the management of DM in the perioperative period. The recommendations encompass preoperative evaluation of patients with DM presenting for ambulatory surgery, management of preoperative oral hypoglycemic agents and home insulins, intraoperative testing and treatment modalities, and blood glucose management in the postanesthesia care unit and transition to home after surgery. High-quality evidence pertaining to perioperative blood glucose management in patients with DM undergoing ambulatory surgery remains sparse. Recommendations are therefore based on recent guidelines and available literature, including general glucose management in patients with DM, data from inpatient surgical populations, drug pharmacology, and emerging treatment data. Areas in need of further research are also identified. Importantly, the benefits and risks of interventions and clinical practice information were considered to ensure that the recommendations maintain patient safety and are clinically valid and useful in the ambulatory setting. What Other Guidelines Are Available on This Topic? Since the publication of the SAMBA Consensus Statement for perioperative blood glucose management in the ambulatory setting in 2010, several recent guidelines have been issued by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), the Endocrine Society, the Centre for Perioperative Care (CPOC), and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI) on DM care in hospitalized patients; however, none are specific to ambulatory surgery. How Does This Guideline Differ From the Previous Guidelines? Previously posed clinical questions that were outdated were revised to reflect current clinical practice. Additional questions were developed relating to the perioperative management of patients with DM to include the newer therapeutic interventions.

Association Between the Blood Glucose Value at PACU Discharge and Postoperative Hypoglycemia in Nondiabetic Patients With Hyperglycemia After Hysteroscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

The target glycemic control for nondiabetic patients in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) after hysteroscopic surgery remains unclear. Our goal is to determine the optimal level of glycemic control by finding the relationship between blood glucose level (BGL) leaving the PACU and postoperative hypoglycemia in nondiabetic patients.

DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a comprehensive tertiary hospital in Chongqing, China between June 2018 and December 2020.

METHODS

The target independent and dependent variables were BGL leaving the PACU and postoperative hypoglycemia, respectively. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoglycemia. Logistic regression was used to explore the association between discharge BGL and hypoglycemia. The optimal glycemic control range was determined by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

FINDINGS

Prior to insulin use, BGL in the insulin-using subgroup might be as high as 20 mmol/L. Hypoglycemia was related to the BGL while leaving the PACU (odds ratio (OR) 0.37 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 0.65]). The best cut-off value (12.95 mmol/L) was determined by fitting the ROC curve.

CONCLUSIONS

If severe hyperglycemia develops during hysteroscopic surgery in individuals with 5% glucose as the mediator of uterine distention, the recommendation is to maintain blood glucose above 12.95 mmol/L when treated with insulin.

Comparison of the patients with diabetes mellitus using either insulin or oral antidiabetic drug in terms of difficult laryngoscopy: A randomized controlled study

Aim

We aimed to evaluate the differences in the difficult laryngoscopy as a general anesthetic component in patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) using either insulin or oral antidiabetic drug (OADD).

Materials and Methods

This study was planned for a total of 230 patients including DM patients and non-DM patients as a control group who would undergo elective surgery between 30.01.2020-30.04.2020. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Mallampati scores, thyromental distance (TMD), inter-incisor distance (IID), and neck extension measurements were noted. Preoperative HbA1C levels, DM type, diagnosis time, and duration of insulin or OADD use were recorded. Patients without DM (Group C), patients using insulin (Group I), and patients using OADD (Group D) were separated respectively. Cormack-Lehane (CL) classification of the airway, number of laryngoscopic attempts, intubation success at the first attempt, intubation duration, performance of backward-upward-rightward pressure (BURP) maneuver, and requirement of use of different airway equipment were compared between the groups.

Results

The data of 192 patients were compared. The mean IID (mm) was lower in Groups I and D than C. It was the lowest in Group I. Presence of neck extension of more than 30° in Groups I and D was lower than C. Classification of CL in Groups I and D was higher than C. Number of laryngoscopic attempts was higher in Groups I and D than C. Intubation success at the first attempt was lower in Groups I and D than C. The intubation duration was longer in Groups I and D than C. It was the longest in Group I. The more BURP maneuvering was required in Groups I and D than C. In Groups I and D, the number of uses of different airway equipment was higher than in Group C. The rate of using a videolaryngoscope (VL) in Group I was higher than in Groups D and C.

Conclusion

Difficult laryngoscopy was more common in DM patients. Moreover, in patients with DM using insulin, VL use was more often and intubation duration was longer than in patients with DM using OADD.

Preoperative Evaluation in the 21st Century

This review aims to provide a conceptual framework for preoperative evaluation and to highlight the clinical evidence available to support perioperative decision-making.

Continuous ex vivo glucose sensing in human physiological fluids using an enzymatic sensor in a vein replica

Managing blood glucose can affect important clinical outcomes during the intraoperative phase of surgery. However, currently available instruments for glucose monitoring during surgery are few and not optimized for the specific application. Here we report an attempt to exploit an enzymatic sensor in a vein replica that could continuously monitor glucose level in an authentic human bloodstream. First, detailed investigations of the superficial venous systems of volunteers were carried out using ocular and palpating examinations, as well as advanced ultrasound measurements. Second, a tubular glucose-sensitive biosensor mimicking a venous system was designed and tested. Almost ideal linear dependence of current output on glucose concentration in phosphate buffer saline was obtained in the range 2.2-22.0 mM, whereas the dependence in human plasma was less linear. Finally, the developed biosensor was investigated in whole blood under homeostatic conditions. A specific correlation was found between the current output and glucose concentration at the initial stage of the biodevice operation. However, with time, blood coagulation during measurements negatively affected the performance of the biodevice. When the experimental results were remodeled to predict the response without the influence of blood coagulation, the sensor output closely followed the blood glucose level.

Strategies for intraoperative glucose management: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Perioperative hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes for patients with and without diabetes. Guidelines and published protocols for intraoperative glycemic management have substantial variation in their recommendations. We sought to characterize the current evidence-guiding intraoperative glycemic management in a scoping review.

SOURCES

Our search strategy included MEDLINE (Ovid and EBSCO), PubMed, PubMed Central, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SciVerse Scopus, and Web of Science and a gray literature search of Google, Google Scholar, hand searching of the reference lists of included articles, OAISter, institutional protocols, and ClinicalTrails.gov.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We identified 41 articles that met our inclusion criteria, 24 of which were original research studies. Outcomes and exposures were defined heterogeneously across studies, which limited comparison and synthesis. Investigators often created arbitrary and differing categories of glucose values rather than analyzing glucose as a continuous variable, which limited our ability to combine results from different studies. In addition, the study populations and surgery types also varied considerably, with few studies performed during day surgeries and specific surgical disciplines. Study populations often included more than one type of surgery, indication, and urgency that were expected to have varying physiologic and inflammatory responses. Combining low- and high-risk patients in the same study population may obscure the harms or benefits of intraoperative glycemic management for high-risk procedures or patients.

CONCLUSION

Future studies examining intraoperative glycemic management should carefully consider the study population, surgical characteristics, and pre- and postoperative management of hyperglycemia.

[Malnutrition management of hospitalized patients with diabetes/hyperglycemia un the perioperative setting]

Introduction

People with diabetes are at high risk of requiring surgical intervention throughout their lives, and of perioperative complications in case of poor metabolic control. Hospitalization represents a stressful event that, together with other factors associated with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, leads to a deterioration in the nutritional status of the patients. An association between poor nutritional status and adverse outcomes in surgical patients has been observed. This article describes the results of the expert consensus and the responses of the panelists on the nutritional management in routine clinical practice of patients with diabetes/hyperglycemia hospitalized (non-critically ill) in the perioperative setting.

Preoperative hyperglycemia is associated with elevated risk of perioperative ischemic stroke in type 2 diabetic patients undergoing non-cardiovascular surgery: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been reported to be associated with perioperative stroke, but the effects of preoperative hyperglycemia on the risk of perioperative stroke in diabetic patients undergoing non-cardiovascular surgery remain unclear. This study investigated the association between preoperative hyperglycemia and the risk of perioperative ischemic stroke in type 2 diabetic patients undergoing non-cardiovascular surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study screened 27,002 patients with type 2 DM undergoing non-cardiovascular surgery with general anesthesia between January 2008 and August 2019 at The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital. The exposure of interest was preoperative hyperglycemia, defined as a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7 mmol/L. The outcome of interest was a new diagnosis of perioperative ischemic stroke within 30 days after surgery. Residual confounding was minimized by controlling for observable patient and intraoperative factors. Logistic regression was conducted in the total and propensity score matched cohorts. In addition, we stratified patients into six subgroups to investigate whether the association between preoperative hyperglycemia and perioperative ischemic stroke differs in these subgroups.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke was 0.53% (n = 144) in the current cohort. The odds of perioperative ischemic stroke were significantly increased for patients with preoperative hyperglycemia after adjusting for patient- related variables (OR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.39-2.75; p < 0.001), surgery-related variables (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.51-2.94; p < 0.001), and all confounding variables (OR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.26-2.53; p < 0.001). The risk of perioperative stroke was significantly increased in patients with preoperative hyperglycemia (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.66-3.9; p < 0.001) in the propensity score matched cohort. Preoperative hyperglycemia was associated with the outcome for all the subgroups except for patients undergoing neurosurgery.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative hyperglycemia is associated with an elevated risk of perioperative stroke in patients with type 2 DM undergoing non-cardiovascular surgery. The effect could be eliminated for patients undergoing neurosurgery, during which specific risk factors should be considered.

Ligament Alteration in Diabetes Mellitus

Connective tissue ageing is accelerated by the progressive accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs). The formation of AGEs is characteristic for diabetes mellitus (DM) progression and affects only specific proteins with relatively long half-lives. This is the case of fibrillar collagens that are highly susceptible to glycation. While collagen provides a framework for plenty of organs, the local homeostasis of specific tissues is indirectly affected by glycation. Among the many age- and diabetes-related morphological changes affecting human connective tissues, there is concurrently reduced healing capacity, flexibility, and quality among ligaments, tendons, bones, and skin. Although DM provokes a wide range of known clinical disorders, the exact mechanisms of connective tissue alteration are still being investigated. Most of them rely on animal models in order to conclude the patterns of damage. Further research and more well-designed large-cohort studies need to be conducted in order to answer the issue concerning the involvement of ligaments in diabetes-related complications. In the following manuscript, we present the results from experiments discovering specific molecules that are engaged in the degenerative process of connective tissue alteration. This review is intended to provide the report and sum up the investigations described in the literature concerning the topic of ligament alteration in DM, which, even though significantly decreasing the quality of life, do not play a major role in research.

Positive Patient Postoperative Outcomes with Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review including Perioperative-Specialty Pharmacist Interviews

The influence of pharmacotherapy regimens on surgical patient outcomes is increasingly appreciated in the era of enhanced recovery protocols and institutional focus on reducing postoperative complications. Specifics related to medication selection, dosing, frequency of administration, and duration of therapy are evolving to optimize pharmacotherapeutic regimens for many enhanced recovery protocolized elements. This review provides a summary of recent pharmacotherapeutic strategies, including those configured within electronic health record (EHR) applications and functionalities, that are associated with the minimization of the frequency and severity of postoperative complications (POCs), shortened hospital length of stay (LOS), reduced readmission rates, and cost or revenue impacts. Further, it will highlight preventive pharmacotherapy regimens that are correlated with improved patient preparation, especially those related to surgical site infection (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative ileus (POI), and emergence delirium (PoD) as well as less commonly encountered POCs such as acute kidney injury (AKI) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The importance of interprofessional collaboration in all periprocedural phases, focusing on medication management through shared responsibilities for drug therapy outcomes, will be emphasized. Finally, examples of collaborative care through shared mental models of drug stewardship and non-medical practice agreements to improve operative throughput, reduce operative stress, and increase patient satisfaction are illustrated.

Oncologic Surgical Care Using an Enhanced Recovery Approach

Enhanced recovery programs are multimodal, evidence-based perioperative programs designed to improve a patient's functional recovery after surgery. Enhanced recovery programs promote standardized, multidisciplinary care throughout the perioperative course to improve patient outcomes, rather than focusing on surgical technique. It is important for nurses working in acute and critical care to be aware of the paradigm shift created by the trend toward the enhanced recovery approach. By learning more about facets of the approach, the nurse will be better prepared to adopt whatever aspects of enhanced recovery their institution implements for the surgical oncology population. An overview is provided of the potential components of enhanced recovery.

Perioperative challenges in management of diabetic patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery

Prediabetes and diabetes are important disease processes which have several perioperative implications. About one third of the United States population is considered to have prediabetes. The prevalence in surgical patients is even higher. This is due to the associated micro and macrovascular complications of diabetes that result in the need for subsequent surgical procedures. A careful preoperative evaluation of diabetic patients and patients at risk for prediabetes is essential to reduce perioperative mortality and morbidity. This preoperative evaluation involves an optimization of preoperative comorbidities. It also includes optimization of antidiabetic medication regimens, as the avoidance of unintentional hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic episodes during the perioperative period is crucial. The focus of the perioperative management is to ensure euglycemia and thus improve postoperative outcomes. Therefore, prolonged preoperative fasting should be avoided and close monitoring of blood glucose should be initiated and continued throughout surgery. This can be accomplished with either analysis in blood gas samples, venous phlebotomy or point-of-care testing. Although capillary and arterial whole blood glucose do not meet standard guidelines for glucose testing, they can still be used to guide insulin dosing in the operating room. Intraoperative glycemic control goals may vary slightly in different protocols but overall the guidelines suggest a glucose range in the operating room should be between 140 mg/dL to 180 mg/dL. When hyperglycemia is detected in the operating room, blood glucose management may be initiated with subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin, with intravenous infusion or boluses of regular insulin. Fluid and electrolyte management are other perioperative challenges. Notably diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic state are the two most serious acute metabolic complications of diabetes that must be recognized early and treated.

Immediate preoperative hyperglycemia correlates with complications in non-cardiac surgical cases

Study objective:

Assess for a relationship between immediate preoperative glucose concentrations and postoperative complications.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

Single large, tertiary care academic medical center.

Patients:

A five-year registry of all patients at our hospital who had a glucose concentration (plasma, serum, or venous/capillary/arterial whole blood) measured up to 6 h prior to a non-emergent surgery.

Interventions:

The glucose registry was cross-referenced with a database from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). We applied an outcomes review to the subset of patients for whom we had data from both registries (n = 1774).

Measurements:

Preoperative glucose concentration in the full population as well as the subgroups of patients with or without diabetes were correlated with adverse postsurgical outcomes using 1) univariable analysis and 2) full multivariable analysis correcting for 27 clinical factors available from the ACS NSQIP database. Logistic regression analysis was performed using glucose level either as a continuous variable or as a categorical variable according to the following classifications: mild (≥140 mg/dL; ≥7.8 mmol/L), moderate (≥180 mg/dL; ≥10 mmol/L), or severe (≥250 mg/dL; ≥13.9 mmol/L) hyperglycemia. A third analysis was performed correcting for 7 clinically important factors (age, BMI, predicted duration of procedure, sex, CKD stage, hypoalbuminemia, and diabetic status) identified by anesthesiologists and surgeons as immediately available and important for decision making.

Main results:

Univariable analysis of all patients and the subgroups of patients without diabetes or with diabetes showed that immediate preoperative mild or moderate hyperglycemia correlates with postoperative complications. Statistical significance was lost in most groups using full multivariable analysis, but not when correcting for the 7 factors available immediately preoperatively. However, for all patients with diabetes, moderate hyperglycemia (≥180 mg/dL; ≥10 mmol/L) continued to significantly correlate with complications even in the full multivariable analysis [odds ratio (OR) 1.79; 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 1.10, 2.92], and with readmission/reoperation within 30 days [OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.18, 3.13].

Conclusions:

Preoperative hyperglycemia within 6 h of surgery is a marker of adverse postoperative outcomes. Among patients with diabetes in our study, a preoperative glucose level ≥ 180 mg/dL (≥10 mmol/L) independently correlates with risk of postoperative complications and readmission/reoperation. These results should encourage future work to determine whether addressing immediate preoperative hyperglycemia can improve complication rates, or simply serves as a marker of higher risk.

The effect of dexmedetomidine on intraoperative blood glucose homeostasis: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on intraoperative blood glucose hemostasis in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac major surgery.

Methods

This was secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Patients in dexmedetomidine group received a loading dose dexmedetomidine (0.6 μg/kg in 10 min before anaesthesia induction) followed by a continuous infusion (0.5 μg/kg/hr) till 1 h before the end of surgery. Patients in control group received volume-matched normal saline at the same time interval. Primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative hyperglycemia (blood glucose higher than 10 mmol/L).

Results

303 patients in dexmedetomidine group and 306 patients in control group were analysed. The incidence of intraoperative hyperglycemia showed no statistical significance between dexmedetomidine group and control group (27.4% vs. 22.5%, RR = 1.22, 95%CI 0.92–1.60, P = 0.167). Median value of glycemic variation in dexmedetomidine group (2.5, IQR 1.4–3.7, mmol) was slightly lower than that in control group (2.6, IQR 1.5–4.0, mmol), P = 0.034. In multivariable logistic analysis, history of diabetes (OR 3.007, 95%CI 1.826–4.950, P < 0.001), higher baseline blood glucose (OR 1.353, 95%CI 1.174–1.560, P < 0.001) and prolonged surgery time (OR 1.197, 95%CI 1.083–1.324, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors of hyperglycaemia.

Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine presented no effect on intraoperative hyperglycemia in elderly patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery.

Trial registration

Present study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on December 1, 2015 (www.chictr.org.cn, registration number ChiCTR-IPR-15007654).

[Diabetes mellitus in Anaesthesia - Optimal Blood Sugar Control in the Perioperative Phase]

Uncontrolled high blood sugar can be dangerous for diabetics throughout the perioperative period - in particular, when blood glucose levels exceed a threshold of 250 mg/dl or HbA_1c levels are higher than 8.5 - 9%. In such cases, all elective surgery should be withheld to minimize the risk of severe complications. Due to their cardiovascular comorbidities, diabetics are commonly overrepresented in hospitals, tend to require inpatient care for an extended period of time, and suffer from higher mortality rates. In order to reduce negative outcomes, blood glucose levels should be targeted to 140 - 180 mg/dl on intensive care units or during surgery. Current literature suggests that non-critically ill diabetics should be treated with rapid-acting insulin analogues subcutaneously in operating theatres, whereas critically ill patients should receive continuous intravenous insulin infusions using a standardized protocol. In summary, this review can give a hand in dealing with diabetics during the perioperative period and offers guidance in controlling blood sugar levels with the help of oral antidiabetic drugs and insulin.

Inpatient Hyperglycemia and Transitions of Care: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The transition of diabetes care from home to hospital, within the hospital, and upon discharge is fraught with gaps that can adversely affect patient safety and length of stay. We aimed to highlight the variability in care during these transitions and point out areas where research is needed.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed with a combination of search terms that pertained to diabetes, hyperglycemia, hospitalization, locations in the hospital, discharge to home or a nursing facility, and diabetes medications. Studies with at least 50 patients that were written in the English language were included.

RESULTS

With the exception of transitioning from intravenous insulin infusion to subcutaneous insulin and perhaps admission to the regular floors, few studies pointedly focused on transitions of care, leading us to extrapolate recommendations based on data from disparate areas of care in the hospital. There is evidence at every stage of care, starting from the entry into the hospital and ending with discharge home or to a facility, that patients benefit from having protocols in place guiding overall care.

CONCLUSION

Pockets of care exist in hospitals where methods of effective diabetes management have been studied and implemented. However, there is no sustained continuum of care. Protocols and care teams that follow patients from one physical location to the other may result in improved clinical outcomes during and following a hospital stay.

Regional anaesthesia in patients with diabetes

Diabetes is the most common metabolic condition worldwide and about 20% of surgical patients will have this condition. It is a major risk-factor for worse outcomes after surgery including mortality; infective and non-infective complications; and increased length of stay. However, diabetes is a modifiable risk-factor, and programs to improve medical management have the potential to reduce peri-operative complications and the risk of harm. Regional anaesthesia has well-documented benefits in promoting the restoration of function but there are legitimate concerns that the incidence of complications of regional anaesthesia in patients with diabetes is higher. The aim of this review is to explore in detail the various potential advantages and disadvantages of regional anaesthesia in patients with diabetes. This, in turn, will allow practitioners to undertake more informed shared decision-making and potentially modify their anaesthetic technique for patients with diabetes.

The Effect of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol on Colorectal Surgery Patients With Diabetes

BACKGROUND

The effect of an enhanced recovery protocol including preoperative carbohydrate loading on patients with diabetes is unclear. This study investigated the effect of both on perioperative glucose management and postoperative outcomes in patients with diabetes undergoing colorectal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Ninety-nine patients with type 2 diabetes (DM, 41 control versus 58 enhanced recovery) and 366 patients without diabetes (NDM, 158 control versus 158 enhanced recovery) were included. Multivariate analyses were run to compare mean peak perioperative serum glucose and postoperative outcomes in enhanced recovery and control cohorts with (DM) and without diabetes (NDM).

RESULTS

Mean peak preoperative glucose was elevated in DM enhanced recovery compared with DM control patients (192.2 [72.2] versus 139.8 [41.4]; P < 0.001). Mean peak intraoperative (162.3 [43.1] versus 163.8 [39.6]; P = 0.869) and postoperative glucose (207.7 [75.8] versus 217.8 [78.5]; P = 0.523) were similar in DM enhanced recovery compared with DM control group. Enhanced recovery led to decreased LOS in DM (P = 0.001) and NDM enhanced recovery patients (P < 0.000) compared with their control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

An enhanced recovery protocol may lead to increased peak preoperative glucose levels and 30-d readmissions in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing colorectal surgery. However, the ultimate clinical significance of transiently elevated preoperative glucose in DM patients is uncertain. Our results suggest that an enhanced recovery protocol and preoperative carbohydrate loading does not lead to poorer postoperative glycemic control overall in patients with diabetes undergoing colorectal surgery.