Pegylated interferons: what role will they play in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C?

Type I interferon therapies of multiple sclerosis and hepatitis C virus infection

Interferons type I (IFN-I), activated following a bacterial or viral infection, play a major role in the induction and regulation of the immune system. The immune response results in viral RNA and binds to receptors such as RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) or Toll-like receptors, leading to the IFN-I signaling cascade. Thanks to its cellular function, IFN-I is widely used in therapies for such diseases as multiple sclerosis (MS) and hepatitis C disease (HCD).

MS is a neurological, autoimmune, chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS). During MS, nerve cell demyelination is observed due to the myelin heaths and oligodendrocyte damage. As a result, neuronal signal and neuron communication are attenuated. The mechanism of MS is still unknown. MS therapy applies interferon-β (IFN-β). IFN-β therapy has been used since the last century, but the therapeutic mechanism of IFN-β has not been completely understood. MS can lead to four syndromes: clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), primary progressive MS (PPMS), and secondary progressive MS (SPMS).

HCD occurs as a result of infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV), belonging to the Flaviviridae family. HCV is a blood-borne virus with a positive single-stranded RNA. A vaccine for HCV is not available yet. HCD can lead to liver damage or cancer. In HCD interferon-α therapy (IFN-α) is applied. As with MS, the mechanism of IFN-α therapy is not completely known.

Analysis of Different Types of Interferon-Associated Retinopathy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection Treated with Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin

This retrospective cohort study aims to investigate interferon (IFN)-associated retinopathy incidence in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection treated with pegylated interferon (PegIFN) plus ribavirin (RBV). We selected 1688 patients undergoing PegIFN/RBV therapy for HCV (HCV-treated cohort), 3376 patients not receiving HCV treatment (HCV-untreated cohort) and 16,880 controls without HCV (non-HCV cohort) from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database. The patients were frequency-matched by age, sex, and index date at a 1:2:10 ratio, and followed up until the end of 2013. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to compare the incidences of any retinal vascular events, including subtypes, among the three cohorts. Compared with the non-HCV cohort, the HCV-treated cohort had a significantly increased risk of retinopathy (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.02–12.3). The risk was particularly prominent for retinal hemorrhage (HR = 12.7, 95% CI: 3.78–42.9). When the HCV-untreated cohort was used as the reference, the aforementioned HRs increased to 9.02 (95% CI: 3.04–26.8) and 32.3 (95% CI: 3.94–265), respectively. This study suggested that PegIFN/RBV therapy significantly increased the risk of retinal hemorrhage but not retinal vascular occlusions in the HCV-treated cohort.

Challenges related to the immunogenicity of parenteral recombinant proteins: Underlying mechanisms and new approaches to overcome it

Immune response elicited by therapeutic proteins is an important safety and efficacy issue for regulatory agencies, drug manufacturers, clinicians, and patients. Administration of therapeutic proteins can potentially induce the production of anti-drug antibodies or cell-mediated immune responses. At first, it was speculated that the immunogenicity is related to the non-human origin of these proteins. Later on, it was confirmed that the human proteins may also show immunogenicity. In this review article, we will focus on a number of factors, which play crucial roles in the human protein immunogenicity. These factors are related to the patient's status (or intrinsic properties) and molecular characteristics of the therapeutic protein's (or extrinsic properties). Furthermore, we will discuss available in silico, in vitro, and in vivo methods for the prediction of sequences, which may generate an immune response following parenteral administration of these proteins. In summary, nowadays, it is possible for drug manufacturers to evaluate the risk of immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins and implement a management plan to overcome the problems prior to proceeding to human clinical trials.

Comparison of peginterferon alfa-2a and alfa-2b for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C: a retrospective study using the Japanese Interferon Database

Purpose

We aimed to compare the rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) achieved with peginterferon (PEG-IFN) alfa-2a and alfa-2b in combination with ribavinin (RBV) for chronic hepatitis C, using a large database of hepatitis cases to improve the generalizability of these results.

Methods

We identified patients with chronic hepatitis C who were treated with PEG-IFN alfa-2a or alfa-2b and RBV, from the Japanese Interferon Database, between December 2009 and April 2013. This database contains the medical records of IFN treatment collected from 36 prefectures in Japan. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare SVR rates obtained with PEG-IFN alfa-2a and alfa-2b, in combination with RBV.

Results

A total of 16,349 patients were recorded in the Japanese Interferon Database. After application of the exclusion criteria, 12,706 patients (3,578 [1,710 males, 1,868 females] on PEG-IFN alfa-2a; and 9,128 [4,652 males, 4,476 females] on PEG-IFN alfa-2b) were included in this analysis. The SVR rate in the PEG-IFN alfa-2b group was 62.0%, as compared with a rate of 55.1% in the PEG-IFN alfa-2a group (crude odds ratio =1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23 to 1.44). There was no significant difference in the adjusted SVR rates between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio =0.96; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.05). Similar proportions of adverse events were observed in the two groups, with the exception of thrombocytopenia, retinopathy, and anemia.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the SVR rates and safety profile between chronic hepatitis C patients treated with the PEG-IFN alfa-2a and alfa-2b.

Interferons and interferon regulatory factors in malaria

Malaria is one of the most serious infectious diseases in humans and responsible for approximately 500 million clinical cases and 500 thousand deaths annually. Acquired adaptive immune responses control parasite replication and infection-induced pathologies. Most infections are clinically silent which reflects on the ability of adaptive immune mechanisms to prevent the disease. However, a minority of these can become severe and life-threatening, manifesting a range of overlapping syndromes of complex origins which could be induced by uncontrolled immune responses. Major players of the innate and adaptive responses are interferons. Here, we review their roles and the signaling pathways involved in their production and protection against infection and induced immunopathologies.

Peginterferon alfa related psoriasis in a patient with acute hepatitis C and review of the literature

The Interferon (IFN) which is the standard treatment for Hepatitis C, may cause a lot of side effects including dermatological anomalies. This paper presents a psoriasis case which occurred in relation with the treatment of acute hepatitis C (AHC) with peginterferon alfa (peg-IFN-α). A 60-year-old male patient came to the hospital with symptoms of high liver enzymes. The patient with history of a recent operation showed anti-HCV(+), HCVRNA 3.5 million IU/mL and HCV genotype 1b in the tests. Without any other etiological factors found in the patient, we started a treatment of peg-IFNα-2b with the diagnosis of AHC. After 3 weeks, psoriatic plaques were observed in various parts of the body. Antiviral treatment of the patient was concluded within 6 months. His psoriasis treatment initially commenced with local agents followed by phototherapy. Permanent viral response was seen in the patient and his lesions recovered rapidly after the antipsoriatic and antiviral treatment. Psoriasis and other autoimmune diseases should be considered even though they are encountered rarely,and the patients should be informed of the possible risks before planning treatment with peg-IFN-α.

Immunotherapies in infectious diseases

The development of an infection involves interplay between the host's immune system and the virulence of the infecting microorganism. The traditional treatment of an infection involves antimicrobial chemotherapy to kill the organism. The use of immunotherapies in infections includes treatment options that modulate the immune response and can lead to control of infections. These therapies are expected to become more important therapeutic options with the increase in infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms and the increasing number of immunocompromised patients.

Biodegradable nanogels for oral delivery of interferon for norovirus infection

Norwalk virus (NV) replicon-harboring cells have provided an excellent tool to the development of antivirals. Previously we demonstrated that the expression levels of replicon RNA and proteins were significantly reduced in the presence of various interferons (IFNs) including IFN-α and IFN-γ in a dose-dependent manner in the NV replicon-harboring cells, and suggested that IFNs could be therapeutic options for norovirus infection. It was also demonstrated that innate immunity including IFNs is crucial in the replication and pathogenicity of murine norovirus (MNV) in vitro (RAW267.4 cells) and in vivo. IFNs have a short half-life in vitro and in vivo due to low stability. Thus it is important to have a good delivery system to improve the stability of IFNs. Nanogels are nanosized networks of chemically cross-linked polymers that swell in physiologic solutions and provide improved stability and bioavailability to drugs. We have synthesized nanogels based on cross-linked polyethyleneimine (PEI)-polyethylenglycol (PEG). The PEI/PEG nanogels were further acetylated (AcNg) to reduce cellular penetration and cytotoxicity. The IFN-AcNg complex was prepared by incubating two components together at 4 °C and lyophilization. The IFN activity of IFN-AcNg was evaluated in the NV- and HCV-replicon-harboring cells and against MNV-1 in RAW267.4 cells in comparison to IFN without AcNg. The AcNg improved the stability of IFN stored at 4 °C, and was well tolerated in the cells. Furthermore, the activity of IFN was significantly higher when combined with AcNg in the replicon-harboring cells and against MNV-1 in RAW267.4 cells. We concluded that AcNg may be pursued further as a vehicle for oral delivery of IFNs in norovirus infection.

A recombinant polypeptide extends the in vivo half-life of peptides and proteins in a tunable manner

Increasing the in vivo residence times of protein therapeutics could decrease their dosing frequencies. We show that genetic fusion of an unstructured recombinant polypeptide of 864 amino acids, called XTEN, to a peptide or protein provides an apparently generic approach to extend plasma half-life. Allometric scaling suggests that a fusion of XTEN to the exenatide peptide should increase exenatide half-life in humans from 2.4 h to a projected time of 139 h. We confirmed the biological activity of the exenatide-XTEN fusion in mice. As extended stability might exacerbate undesirable side effects in some cases, we show that truncating the XTEN sequence can regulate plasma half-life. XTEN lacks hydrophobic amino acid residues that often contribute to immunogenicity and complicate manufacture. Based on data on XTEN fusions to exenatide, glucagon, GFP and human growth hormone, we expect that XTEN will enable dosing of otherwise rapidly cleared protein drugs at up to monthly intervals in humans.

Cyclic changes in gene expression induced by Peg-interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in peripheral blood monocytes (PBMC) of hepatitis C patients during the first 10 weeks of treatment

Background and Aims

This study determined the kinetics of gene expression during the first 10 weeks of therapy with Pegylated-interferon-alfa2b (PegIntron™) and ribavirin (administered by weight) in HCV patients and compared it with the recently completed Virahep C study [1,2] in which Peginterferon-alfa2a (Pegasys™) and ribavirin were administered.

Methods

RNA was isolated from peripheral blood monocytes (PBMC) from twenty treatment-naïve patients just before treatment (day 1) and at days 3, 6, 10, 13, 27, 42 and 70 days after treatment. Gene expression at each time was measured using Affymetrix microarrays and compared to that of day 1.

Results

The expression of many genes differed significantly (p ≤ 0.001 and changed at least 1.5-fold) at days 3 (290 probes) and 10 (255 probes), but the number dropped at days 6 (165) and 13 (142). Most genes continued to be up regulated throughout the trial period. A second group of genes, including CXCL10, CMKLR1 (chemokine receptor 1), TRAIL, IL1Rα and genes associated with complement and lipid metabolism, was transiently induced early in treatment. CDKN1C (cyclin kinase inhibitor 1) was induced early but repressed at later times. Genes induced at later times were mostly related to blood chemistry and oxygen transport. By week 10, 11 of the patients demonstrated a positive response to therapy, and the final sustained viral response (SVR) was 35%. The levels of gene induction or decrease was very similar to that previously reported with Pegasys/ribavirin treatment.

Conclusion

The response to Pegintron/ribavirin was similar to that reported for Pegasys/ribavirin despite some differences in the amount administered. We did not detect major differences at the genomic level between patients responding to treatment or non-responders, perhaps because of limited power. Gene induction occurred in a cyclic fashion, peaking right after administration of interferon and declining between administrations of the drug. Our data suggest that more than once a week dosing might be desirable early during treatment to maintain high levels of response as measured by gene expression.

Adult respiratory distress syndrome after treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin

Pulmonary manifestations of interferon (IFN) use are a rare but well known complication seen with both standard and pegylated interferon alpha-2b (pegIFNalpha-2b) forms of the agent. These are generally of modest intensity and reversible. We report the first case of fulminant adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a (pegIFNalpha-2a) and ribavirin use for hepatitis C, complicated by subsequent and ultimately fatal sepsis and multiorgan failure. Practicing gastroenterologists and intensivists alike need to be aware of the potential for serious pulmonary sequelae with the use of combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C viral (CHCV) infections.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 4 with peginterferon alfa-2a: Impact of bilharziasis and fibrosis stage

AIM: To evaluate pegylated interferon alpha2a (PegIFN-α2a) in Egyptian patients with HCV genotype 4, and the impact of pretreatment viral load, co-existent bilharziasis and histological liver changes on response rate.

METHODS: A total of 73 naïve patients (61 with history of bilharziasis) with compensated chronic HCV genotype 4 were enrolled into: group A (38 patients) who received 180 mg PegIFN-alpha2a subcutaneously once weekly for a year and group B (35 patients) received IFN alpha-2a 3 MU 3 times weekly. Ribavirin was added to each regimen at a dose of 1200 mg. Patients were followed for 72 wk and sustained response was assessed.

RESULTS: Significant improvement in both end of treatment response (ETR) (P < 0.002) and sustained response (SR) (P < 0.05) was noted with pegylated interferon, where ETR was achieved in 29 (76.3%) and 14 patients (40%) in both groups respectively, and 25 patients in group A (65.8%) and 9 (25.7%) in group B could retain negative viraemia by the end of follow up period. Sustained virological response (SVR) showed a significant negative correlation with age and positive correlation with pretreatment inflammation in patients receiving PegIFN. Viral clearance after 3 mo of therapy was associated with high incidence of ETR and SR (P < 0.001), but without significant difference between both forms of interferon. Significant improvement in response was achieved in patients with high grade fibrosis (grade 3 and 4) with PegIFN-α2a, where SR was seen in 5 out of 13 patients in group A, but none in group B. There was no significant difference in response between bilharzial and non-bilharzial patients in both groups. In terms of safety and tolerability, neutropenia was the predominant side effect; both drugs were comparable.

CONCLUSION: PegIFN-α2a combined with ribavirin results in improvement in sustained response in HCV genotype 4, irrespective of history of bilharzial infestation.

Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus ribavirin: a review of its use in hepatitis C Virus And HIV co-infection

Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is the standard first-line treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) mono-infection. Although the optimal anti-HCV regimen is not established in the more difficult-to-treat population with HIV-HCV co-infection, much of the data in this clinical setting have been derived from studies evaluating peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) [Pegasys] plus ribavirin (Copegus), most notably the APRICOT (AIDS Pegasys Ribavirin International Co-Infection Trial) and the ACTG (AIDS Clinical Trial Group) A5071 study. In particular, results of APRICOT - the largest study conducted to date with a pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in patients with HIV-HCV co-infection - indicate that a substantial proportion of patients will achieve sustained virological response (SVR) at week 72 when these drugs are administered for 48 weeks in an appropriate dosage regimen. In general, the tolerability profile of peginterferon-alpha-2a plus ribavirin in APRICOT was similar to that previously reported in patients with HCV mono-infection.

Biological and clinical basis for molecular studies of interferons

The cytokine family of interferons (IFNs) has multiple functions, including antiviral, anti-tumor, and immunomodulatory effects and regulation of cell differentiation. The multiple functions of the IFN system are thought to be an innate defense against microbes and foreign substances. The IFN system consists first of cells that produce IFNs in response to viral infection or other foreign stimuli and second of cells that establish the antiviral state in response to IFNs. This process of innate immunity involves multiple signaling mechanisms and activation of various host genes. Viruses have evolved to develop mechanisms that circumvent this system. IFNs have also been used clinically in the treatment of viral diseases. Improved treatments will be possible with better understanding of the IFN system and its interactions with viral factors. In addition, IFNs have direct and indirect effects on tumor cell proliferation, effector leukocytes and on apoptosis and have been used in the treatment of some cancers. Improved knowledge of how IFNs affect tumors and the mechanism that lead to a lack of response to IFNs would help the development of better IFN treatments for malignancies.

Hepatitis C treatment update

Hepatitis C is a leading cause of chronic liver disease in the United States, and the prevalence of hepatitis C-associated complications is increasing. Therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin has become the standard of care for chronic hepatitis C; the sustained response rate for treatment-naïve patients is about 55%. If certain patients fail to achieve a 12-week treatment milestone, an early virologic response, they may be taken off treatment early, potentially sparing them from unnecessary medication. Adherence is critical for treatment success. Although side effects continue to be a hindrance to the success of therapy, agents such as growth factors and antidepressants may help patients to maintain medication dosing and complete treatment. Therapy is generally recommended for those in whom the infection is most likely to progress to cirrhosis; however, there is continued debate about the suitability of certain patients for treatment, including those with persistently normal aminotransferase levels or acute hepatitis C and nonresponders to conventional treatment. Four broad groups of investigational therapeutic agents appear promising for future therapy: modified interferons and ribavirins, immunomodulators, viral life-cycle targets, and antifibrotic agents.

Hepatitis C Infection: A Clinical Review

Nearly three million persons in the United States are viremic with hepatitis C (HCV). Despite a decreasing incidence of HCV in this country, the prevalence of HCV-related chronic liver disease is increasing. Most infections in the United States are acquired by intravenous drug use. The chronicity rate of HCV is high, reaching 85% in some populations, and the risk of progression to advanced liver disease is as high as 20% within twenty years of infection. Host factors like alcohol use accelerate the rate of progression. The enzyme immunoassay is the preferred initial test for diagnosis; the third generation assay has greater than a 99% specificity in immunocompetent patients. Barring contraindications, the standard of care for treatment of chronic HCV has become pegylated interferon and ribavirin. With this therapy, the cure rate for treatment-naïve patients is about 55%, but rates are higher in certain groups. Common side effects of therapy include neuropsychiatric symptoms, influenza-like symptoms and hematological abnormalities.

Management of Chronic Hepatitis C in Patients Co-Infected with HIV

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant public health problem and one of the most important causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. Co-infection with HCV and HIV occurs frequently, mainly because both viruses share the same transmission routes. In recent years, the life expectancy of patients with HIV disease has been increased due to the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Furthermore, several studies have established that HIV infection is associated with a major progression of the HCV-related liver disease. Thus, end-stage liver disease has become a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population, emphasising the importance of treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected persons. The biological and histological benefit of interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) therapy in patients co-infected with HCV/HIV is not significantly different from that noted in similar patients without HIV when the HIV infection is adequately controlled. However, patients with low CD4+ cell counts tend to respond poorly to anti-HCV therapy.Given the relatively low sustained virological response rate to IFN alone, the use of IFNalpha monotherapy has been largely abandoned in favour of combination therapy with ribavirin. In the last 2 years, IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy has been the standard care for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Although information on the safety and efficacy of this dual therapy in HCV/HIV co-infected patients is scarce, recent trials have reported that the combination of IFN plus ribavirin is well tolerated and feasible in patients co-infected with HCV/HIV. However, the rates of sustained virological response seem to be worse than those observed in patients without HIV infection. New IFN formulations (e.g. pegylated interferon) plus ribavirin appear to be way of the future for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients both with and without HIV co-infection.

Controversies in the management of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation is universal. A significant percentage of these patients develop progressive graft injury and cirrhosis. Those factors that modulate disease progression in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus infection remain controversial and are poorly understood. Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation with either interferon or interferon and ribavirin has yielded only limited success. Regardless of this, treatment is instituted. Peginterferon is more effective than standard interferon for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the nontransplantation setting when used either alone or with ribavirin. The effectiveness of peginterferon, both with and without ribavirin in the posttransplantation setting, is currently being explored. In this review those factors thought to affect disease progression in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus will be discussed, strategies that have been used to treat recurrent hepatitis C virus will be reviewed, and the impact that peginterferon may have on hepatitis C virus infection in the pretransplantation and posttransplantation setting will be explored.

Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus ribavirin: a review of its use in the management of chronic hepatitis C

Pegylation of interferon-alpha-2a is associated with improved sustained virological response rates in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Subsequently, combination therapy with peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) [Pegasys] and ribavirin (Copegus trade mark, Rebetol) was investigated to establish if the efficacy of peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) monotherapy could be further enhanced. Subcutaneous peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) was administered at a dosage of 180 micro g once weekly and oral ribavirin was usually administered at a dosage of 1000 or 1200 mg/day. In treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C, the sustained virological response rate (assessed 24 weeks after the end of a 48-week treatment period) was significantly higher in peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus ribavirin recipients than in peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus placebo recipients or interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin recipients (56% vs 29% and 44%). Retrospective analysis revealed that peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus ribavirin recipients who did not achieve an early virological response were unlikely to achieve a sustained response. Treatment with peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus another antiviral agent (ribavirin, mycophenolate mofetil, amantadine, or ribavirin and amantadine) was beneficial in patients with chronic hepatitis C who had relapsed during or after, or had not responded to, treatment with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin. In the relapse study, sustained virological response rates in recipients of peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus ribavirin were 45% with and 38% without amantadine. Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus ribavirin appears beneficial in patients with chronic hepatitis C considered difficult to treat (e.g. patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 4, African-American patients, patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis and patients co-infected with HIV). Flu-like symptoms and depression occurred significantly less frequently with peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus ribavirin than with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin. Similar proportions of patients receiving peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus ribavirin, peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus placebo and interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin withdrew from treatment because of laboratory abnormalities or other adverse events. In conclusion, combination therapy comprising subcutaneous peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) and oral ribavirin is an important new treatment option for chronic hepatitis C. Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus oral ribavirin is significantly more effective than peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) monotherapy or interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin at inducing a sustained virological response in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Preliminary data suggest that peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus ribavirin is also beneficial in treatment-experienced patients and in patients who have traditionally been considered difficult to treat. Combination therapy with peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) and oral ribavirin is poised to become a valuable first-line treatment option in chronic hepatitis C.

Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: clinical implications and future prospects

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic proteins have revolutionized the treatment of many diseases. In the near future, many more therapeutic proteins are likely to become available for an increasingly wide range of indications.

OBJECTIVES

This article reviews the incidence, causes, and consequences of formation of antibodies to therapeutic proteins and suggests ways to address issues surrounding immunogenicity.

METHODS

Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were performed, covering the period 1990 to May 2002. Search terms included immunogenicity, antibodies, and the names of specific therapeutic proteins and classes of therapeutic proteins. Bibliographies of retrieved articles were not searched.

RESULTS

All exogenous proteins, including therapeutic ones, have the potential to cause antibody formation. The reported incidence of antibody formation with therapeutic proteins varies widely between proteins and between studies (depending on the assay techniques used). The clinical consequences of antibody formation vary with the type of antibody present; for example, neutralizing antibodies are more likely to cause loss of efficacy than nonneutralizing antibodies. The immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins can be influenced by many factors, including the genetic background of the patient, the type of disease, the type of protein (human or nonhuman), the presence of conjugates or fragments, the route of administration, dose frequency, and duration of treatment. Manufacturing, handling, and storage can introduce contaminants, or alter the 3-dimensional structure of the protein via oxidation or aggregate formation. Various means have been suggested by which therapeutic proteins might be modified to reduce their immunogenicity, including PEGylation, site-specific mutagenesis, exon shuffling, and humanization of monoclonal antibodies. In the future, it may even be possible to predict the immunogenicity of new therapeutic proteins more accurately, using specifically designed animal models, including nonhuman primates and transgenic mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Scientists and clinicians are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of assessing the immunogenicity of new molecules as they are introduced, and of existing molecules whenever they are modified or their manufacturing process is changed. Immune responses to therapeutic proteins are usually only of clinical significance if they are associated with the development of treatment resistance. Although various means to reduce the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins have been suggested, monitoring for antibodies during clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance remains an important issue for all therapeutic proteins.

Interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin: a review of its use in the management of chronic hepatitis C

Relatively few patients (< or =20%) with chronic hepatitis C achieve a sustained virological response after interferon-alpha monotherapy. Hence, alternative treatment strategies such as the addition of the broad spectrum antiviral agent ribavirin to interferon-alpha-2b have been investigated. Combination therapy with subcutaneous interferon-alpha-2b [3 million units (MU) three times per week] plus oral ribavirin (1000 to 1200 mg/day) has proven effective in several well designed trials of 24 to 48 weeks' duration in adult patients with compensated chronic hepatitis C. Compared with interferon-alpha-2b (3 or 6 MU three times per week) with or without placebo, combination treatment with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin significantly enhanced end-of-treatment and sustained virological and biochemical response rates in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients [sustained virological response rates in treatment-naive recipients (6 to 19% vs 31 to 43% of patients); sustained overall (virological plus biochemical) response rates in nonresponders to (1 vs 14%) or relapsers (4 to 5% vs 30 to 44%) after previous interferon-alpha monotherapy]. Forty-eight weeks of combination therapy was superior to 24 weeks in treatment-naive patients infected with hepatitis virus C (HCV) genotype 1, whereas response rates were similar at 24 and 48 weeks in those infected with other HCV genotypes. Furthermore, there were marked improvements in histological inflammatory scores in patients who responded to treatment with either interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin or interferon-alpha-2b alone. Although adverse events associated with either drug during combination therapy occurred frequently, these were generally mild to moderate in intensity and were consistent with those reported for each individual agent. Twenty-six percent of patients required dosage modifications of one or both drugs during combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin is an efficacious first- and second-line therapy in adult patients with compensated chronic hepatitis C, significantly improving sustained virological and biochemical responses versus interferon-alpha-2b monotherapy. The tolerability profile of interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin therapy is consistent with the individual profiles of these agents with no evidence of additive effects. The place of interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy in relation to newer agents, including pegylated interferons-alpha and other multidrug regimens, remains to be determined in this rapidly evolving area of therapeutic management. Currently, combination therapy with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C and compensated liver disease, and is an option for use as second-line therapy in those who have relapsed after, or failed to respond to, previous treatment with interferon-alpha.

Interferon alfacon-1: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C

Interferon alfacon-1 (consensus interferon) is a non-naturally occurring, synthetic, type 1 interferon (IFN)alpha that is used for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The efficacy of subcutaneously administered interferon alfacon-1 has been demonstrated in clinical trials during the treatment of LFN-naive patients (interferon alfacon-1 9microg 3 times a week for 24 weeks) and retreatment of nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon therapy (interferon alfacon1 15 microg 3 times a week for up to 48 weeks). Higher and more frequent interferon alfacon-1 dosages have also been investigated. Results from a pivotal double-blind randomised trial in 704 patients with chronic hepatitis C showed that interferon alfacon-19 microg 3 times a week achieved virological and biochemical response rates of 34.9 and 42.2%, respectively, at treatment end-point (week 24). Sustained virological and biochemical responses (week 48) were reported in 12.1 and 20.3% of the patients, respectively. In general, response rates in recipients of interferon alfacon-1 9 microg 3 times a week were similar to those achieved with IFN-alpha2b 3 MIU 3 times a week. However, interferon alfacon-1 was more effective in the subgroup of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 at end-point (virological response, 24 vs 15%; p < 0.05) and post-treatment observation period (8 vs 4%) although the difference between treatment groups was statistically significant only at treatment end-point. The sustained virological response rate achieved in patients with high baseline levels of serum HCV RNA receiving interferon alfacon-1 was statistically superior to that exhibited in the IFN-alpha2b treatment group (7 vs 0%; p < Interferon alfacon-1 also showed efficacy during the retreatment of non-responders and relapsers to previous IFN therapy in a large nonblind multicentre trial. Sustained virological response (week 72) was observed among 13 and 58% of nonresponders and relapsers, respectively, after 48 weeks of treatment with interferon alfacon-1 15 microg 3 times a week. Interferon alfacon-1 has been generally well tolerated in clinical trials. As with other IFNs, adverse events were reported frequently but were usually considered of mild to moderate severity, decreased with time and caused a small percentage of patients to withdraw from the treatment. Fever, fatigue, arthralgia, myalgia, headache and rigors were the most frequently reported adverse events. Psychiatric adverse events appeared to be dose-related and caused the majority of treatment withdrawals.

CONCLUSION

Interferon alfacon-1 is generally well tolerated and is an effective agent in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Comparative data from a pivotal randomised trial indicate that the drug has at least equivalent efficacy to IFNalpha-2b, and a statistically significant advantage was demonstrated at treatment end-point in patients infected with HCV genotype 1. A number of ongoing trials with interferon alfacon-1 are evaluating issues such as the optimal dosage regimen and duration of therapy in an effort to improve sustained virological response to therapy, a goal for IFNs in general.

Structural and biologic characterization of pegylated recombinant IFN-alpha2b

The type I interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) family is a family of natural small proteins that have clinically important anti-infective and antitumor activity. We have developed a semisynthetic protein-polymer conjugate of IFN-alpha2b (Intron A) by attaching a 12,000-Da monomethoxypolyethylene glycol (PEG-12000) polymer to the protein. PEG conjugation is thought to increase the serum half-life and thereby prolong patient exposure to IFN-alpha2b without altering the biologic potency to the protein. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization/mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS), high-performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC), circular dichroism (CD) analysis and tryptic digestion peptide analysis of PEG Intron demonstrated that the IFN-alpha2b protein was approximately 95% monopegylated and that the primary, the secondary, and the tertiary structures were unaltered. Pegylation did not affect the epitope recognition of antibodies used for Intron A quantitation. An extensive analysis of the pegylated positional isomers revealed that approximately 50% of PEG Intron was monopegylated on the His(34) residue of the IFN-alpha2b protein. The highest antiviral activity of the pegylated positional isomers for PEG Intron was associated with the His(34) pegylated isomer. The specific activity for PEG Intron in an antiviral cytopathic protection assay was 28%, relative to Intron A. However, the potency of PEG Intron, defined as bioactivity independent of protein concentration, was comparable to Intron A at both the molecular and cellular levels in a battery of in vitro assays. Equivalent units of PEG Intron and Intron A were indistinguishable for the induction of several key IFN-induced genes, including 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase (2',5'-OAS) and protein kinase R (PKR), in Molt 4 cells. The antiviral dose-response curves revealed that there were no significant differences between PEG Intron and Intron A. This demonstrated that the introduction of more IFN-alpha2b protein associated with equivalent unit dosing of PEG Intron did not create any antagonism or agonism in the antiviral assay. In assays for the immune response, PEG Intron and Intron A displayed comparable potency for both natural-killer (NK) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cell cytolytic activity and for the induction of class I major histocompatibility protein. These results demonstrate that PEG Intron maintains an in vitro biologic potency profile for both antiviral and immunotherapeutic activity that is highly comparable to that of Intron A.

Management of interferon therapy nonresponders

Despite improvements in the therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) over the past several years, many patients still fail to become hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) undetectable during treatment and are classified as nonresponders. Providing treatment recommendations for these patients requires that the likelihood of achieving any benefit from another course of therapy be balanced with the natural history of chronic HCV. The management of nonresponders represents the most challenging of all aspects in the care of patients with chronic HCV. Retreatment of interferon non-responders with interferon and ribavirin has yielded a long-term virologic benefit in only 10% to 25% of patients. The efficacy of peginterferon and peginterferon with ribavirin for nonresponders has yet to be defined.