Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Feeding Intolerance in Critical Illness: Do We Need an Objective Scoring System?

Early Feeding in Critical Care - Where Are We Now?

The aim to avoid underfeeding has resulted in relative overfeeding of patients in the early phase of critical illness, worsening instead of improving outcomes. Negative randomised controlled trials have triggered mechanistic studies to investigate possible mechanisms explaining harm, allowing more scientific interpretation of many unexpected results during the last decades. Whereas individualized evidence-based approach to nutrition is still only rarely available, discussing and understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms should assist in decision-making in clinical practice. Further exploration of mechanisms of harm and benefit, as well as development of new technologies are needed to better plan future nutrition studies.

Clinical Predictors and Prevalence of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Acute Pancreatitis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) leads to severe inflammation and nutritional deficits, with 80% of severe cases experiencing critical protein loss. Timely enteral nutrition is essential for recovery. This study systematically reviews and analyzes the incidence and predictors of enteral nutrition intolerance (ENI) in AP patients. Methods: Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed were searched up to May 2024. Studies reporting on ENI incidence and predictors in AP patients were included based on predefined criteria. Bias was assessed using standardized tools, and meta-analyses provided summary estimates with confidence intervals. Results: From the 2697 screened studies, 28 involving 4853 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled incidence of ENI was 26%. Significant predictors included comorbid diabetes, pancreatic necrosis, elevated pre-refeeding serum lipase levels, peri-pancreatic fluid collections, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome at admission. Higher ENI rates were observed in Europe, among patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), those receiving nasoenteric feeding, and in prospective study cohorts. Conclusions: ENI affects approximately one-quarter of AP patients and is not significantly associated with age, sex, or the cause of AP. Its incidence varies by region, disease severity, feeding method and study design. Identifying predictors, such as comorbid diabetes and pancreatic necrosis, may help clinicians reduce the risk of ENI. The limitations of this study include the heterogeneity of the included studies and inconsistent ENI diagnostic criteria.

Risk prediction models for feeding intolerance in patients with enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although more risk prediction models are available for feeding intolerance in enteral-nourishment patients, it is still unclear how well these models will work in clinical settings. Future research faces challenges in validating model accuracy across populations, enhancing interpretability for clinical use, and overcoming dataset limitations.

Objective

To thoroughly examine studies that have been published on feeding intolerance risk prediction models for enteral nutrition patients.

Design

Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Methods

A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using a range of databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Embase. The search scope was confined to articles within the database from its inception until August 12th, 2024. The data from the selected studies should be extracted, including study design, subjects, duration of follow-up, data sources, outcome measures, sample size, handling of missing data, continuous variable handling methods, variable selection, final predictors, model development and performance, and form of model presentation. The applicability and bias risk were evaluated using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) checklist.

Results

A total of 1,472 studies were retrieved. Following the selection criteria, 18 prediction models sourced from 14 studies were incorporated into this review. In the field of model construction, only one study employed the use of multiple machine-learning techniques for the development of a model. In contrast, the remaining studies used logistic regression to construct FI risk prediction models. The incidence of FI in enteral nutrition was 32.4-63.1%. The top five predictors included in the model were APACHE II, age, albumin levels, intra-abdominal pressure, and mechanical ventilation. The reported AUC, or area under the curve, exhibited a range of values between 0.70 and 0.921. All studies were identified as having a high risk of bias, primarily due to the use of inappropriate data sources and inadequate reporting within the analysis domain.

Conclusion

Although the included studies reported a certain degree of discriminatory power in their predictive models to identify feeding intolerance in patients undergoing enteral nutrition, the PROBAST assessment tool deemed all the included studies to carry a significant risk of bias. Future research should emphasize the development of innovative predictive models. These endeavors should incorporate more extensive and diverse sample sizes, adhere to stringent methodological designs, and undergo rigorous multicenter external validation to ensure robustness and generalizability.

Systematic review registration

Identifier CRD42024585099, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=585099.

Comparison of enteral prucalopride versus intravenous metoclopramide for feeding intolerance in patients with critical illness: a randomized double-blinded study

Background

Feeding intolerance is commonly experienced during enteral feeding, necessitating cessation. Metoclopramide may be given to assist gastric emptying, but patients experience adverse effects and gradual loss of efficacy. Prucalopride, a safer prokinetic, may play a role in gastric emptying. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess its effectiveness and safety in feeding intolerance developed in critically ill patients.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective randomized double-blinded study, patients with feeding intolerance were randomized to receive 2 mg prucalopride enterally once daily or 10 mg metoclopramide intravenously every 6-8 h for 7 days. Patients were monitored for treatment failure, successful feeding, gastric residual volume (GRV), and the development of medication-related adverse effects.

Results

A total of 70 patients (35 in the metoclopramide group and 35 in the prucalopride group) completed the study. The average daily GRV in the prucalopride group was significantly lower compared to the metoclopramide group (p=<0.001) on day 7. Additionally, the percentage change in GRV from day 1 to day 7 showed a greater significant change in the prucalopride arm versus the metoclopramide arm (p=<0.001). The treatment groups were comparable in terms of ICU length of stay (p = 0.094). Moreover, there was a significantly higher successful caloric intake in the prucalopride group compared to the metoclopramide group on day 7 (p = 0.039).

Conclusion

Prucalopride administration in enterally fed patients with feeding intolerance may reduce GRV and improve feeding success rates compared to metoclopramide treatment. The use of prucalopride was found to be tolerable and safe in critically ill patients.

Clinical Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05496179.

The efficacy of fiber-supplemented enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the benefits of fiber-supplemented enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill patients is inconsistent, and critical care nutrition guidelines lack recommendations based on high-quality evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) aims to provide a current synthesis of the literature on this topic.

METHODS

For this SRMA of randomized controlled trials (RCT), electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL) were searched systematically from inception to January 2024 and updated in June 2024. Trials investigating clinical effects of fiber-supplemented EN versus placebo or usual care in adult critically ill patients were selected. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Random-effect meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were conducted. The primary outcome was overall mortality, and one of the secondary outcomes was diarrhea incidence. Subgroup analyses were also performed for both outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty studies with 1405 critically ill patients were included. In conventional meta-analysis, fiber-supplemented EN was associated with a significant reduction of overall mortality (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47, 0.92, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%; 12 studies) and diarrhea incidence (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51, 0.96, p = 0.03, I2 = 51%; 11 studies). However, both outcomes were assessed to have very serious risk of bias, and, according to TSA, a type-1 error cannot be ruled out. No subgroup differences were found for the primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

Very low-certainty evidence suggests that fiber-supplemented EN has clinical benefits. High-quality multicenter RCTs with large sample sizes are needed to substantiate any firm recommendation for its routine use in this group of patients. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023492829.

Clinical value of fibroblast growth factor 19 in predicting gastrointestinal dysfunction in patients with sepsis

Objective

To assess the potential value of fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) as a predictor of gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction in patients with sepsis.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted, and 209 patients who were diagnosed with sepsis and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at teaching hospitals in China were enrolled from June 2023 to December 2023. The serum FGF19 level was determined at ICU admission. The differences in serum FGF19 levels between the two groups were compared via the Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to identify the correlations of the FGF19 concentration with other clinical variables and biomarkers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the value of FGF19 in predicting GI dysfunction in patients with sepsis.

Results

The total ICU mortality rate was 13.3% (24/180). There was a tendency toward increased ICU mortality in patients with sepsis-associated GI dysfunction compared with patients without GI dysfunction with statistical significance (21.9% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.031). Serum FGF19 levels were significantly higher in patients with sepsis-associated GI dysfunction than in patients without GI dysfunction [355.1 (37.2, 2315.4) μg/mL vs. 127.4 (5.7, 944.2) μg/mL, p = 0.003]. The results of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the ability of FGF19 to predict GI dysfunction in patients with sepsis was 0.773 (95% CI 0.712 ~ 0.827), which was greater than the predictive capacity of PCT [AUC = 0.632 (95% CI 0.562 ~ 0.804)].

Conclusion

Serum FGF19 could be considered as a novel predictor or biomarker of GI dysfunction in patients with sepsis.

Initiation of adaptive feeding within 24 h after burn injury improves nutritional therapy for severely burned patients

Introduction and objective

Nutritional therapy is a crucial component of treatment for severely burned patients. Although overly aggressive enteral nutrition immediately after burn injury has potential risks, nutritional disruption after a severe burn can also increase infection risk and delay wound healing. For approximately six decades, the Ruijin Hospital Burn Center has used two distinct approaches for patients during the early period after burn injury: complete fasting or adaptive feeding. Notably, adaptive feeding more closely resembles enteral nutrition. In this retrospective study, we analyzed factors influencing the selection of either modality, as well as the benefits of adaptive feeding. We sought to promote adaptive feeding as a precursor to initiating enteral nutrition.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study analyzed medical data from adult patients with extensive burns between January 2009 and December 2020. All patients had been admitted to the burn department within 24 h after injury and had a burned area comprising >30% of total body surface area. Patients were divided into two groups: adaptive feeding and fasting. We examined the total burned area, full-thickness burned area, burn type, inhalation injury, start time of adaptive feeding, and start time of enteral nutrition. Outcome measures were 28-day mortality and hospital mortality.

Results

Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in burn type, percent of total body surface area (TBSA), full-thickness burned area, and inhalation injury between the adaptive feeding and fasting groups (all p < 0.05). Linear regression analysis showed that full-thickness burned area and inhalation injury were the main factors influencing the start time of adaptive feeding in patients with severe burns (p < 0.05). After propensity score matching analysis, the results showed that the start time of enteral nutrition was significantly earlier in the adaptive feeding group (p < 0.01). However, overall mortality, 28-day mortality, and length of hospital stay did not significantly improve in the adaptive feeding group. The incidence of intolerance after enteral nutrition therapy did not significantly differ between groups.

Conclusion

The results of the study showed that larger full-thickness burned areas and concomitant inhalation injury were the primary factors considered by physicians when selecting complete fasting for severely burned patients. Moreover, the results indicate that adaptive feeding improves nutritional therapy for severely burned patients by shortening the time between injury and initiation of enteral nutrition. Complete fasting due to concerns about extensive burned area and inhalation injuries does not reduce the incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance; instead, it delays the initiation of enteral nutrition.

Does Ileus Represent the Forgotten End Organ Failure in Critical Illness?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates the current literature on ileus, impaired gastrointestinal transit (IGT), and acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) and its impact on multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ileus is often under recognized in critically ill patients and is associated with significant morbidity and is potentially a marker of disease severity as seen in other organs like kidneys (ATN).

Enteral nutrition in septic shock: a call for a paradigm shift

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to identify contemporary evidence evaluating enteral nutrition in patients with septic shock, outline risk factors for enteral feeding intolerance (EFI), describe the conundrum of initiating enteral nutrition in patients with septic shock, appraise current EFI definitions, and identify bedside monitors for guiding enteral nutrition therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

The NUTRIREA-2 and NUTRIREA-3 trial results have better informed the dose of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients with circulatory shock. In both trials, patients with predominant septic shock randomized to receive early standard-dose nutrition had more gastrointestinal complications. Compared to other contemporary RCTs that included patients with circulatory shock, patients in the NUTRIREA-2 and NUTRIREA-3 trials had higher bowel ischemia rates, were sicker, and received full-dose enteral nutrition while receiving high baseline dose of vasopressor. These findings suggest severity of illness, vasopressor dose, and enteral nutrition dose impact outcomes.

SUMMARY

The provision of early enteral nutrition preserves gut barrier functions; however, these benefits are counterbalanced by potential complications of introducing luminal nutrients into a hypo-perfused gut, including bowel ischemia. Findings from the NUTRIREA2 and NUTRIREA-3 trials substantiate a 'less is more' enteral nutrition dose strategy during the early acute phase of critical illness. In the absence of bedside tools to guide the initiation and advancement of enteral nutrition in patients with septic shock, the benefit of introducing enteral nutrition on preserving gut barrier function must be weighed against the risk of harm by considering dose of vasopressor, dose of enteral nutrition, and severity of illness.

Using Machine-Learning to Assess the Prognostic Value of Early Enteral Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The association between gastrointestinal intolerance during early enteral nutrition (EN) and adverse clinical outcomes in critically ill patients is controversial. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) markers during early ICU stays and to predict early EN failure using a machine learning (ML) approach.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from adult patients admitted to Beilinson Hospital ICU between January 2011 and December 2018 for more than 48 h and received EN. Clinical data, including demographics, severity scores, EFI markers, and medications, along with 72 h after admission, were analyzed by ML algorithms. Prediction performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUCROC) of a ten-fold cross-validation set.

RESULTS

The datasets comprised 1584 patients. The means of the cross-validation AUCROCs for 90-day mortality and early EN failure were 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.67-0.74), respectively. Gastric residual volume above 250 mL on the second day was an important component of both prediction models.

CONCLUSIONS

ML underlined the EFI markers that predict poor 90-day outcomes and early EN failure and supports early recognition of at-risk patients. Results have to be confirmed in further prospective and external validation studies.

Nutritional intake and gastro-intestinal symptoms in critically ill COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Critically ill COVID-19 patients seem hypermetabolic and difficult to feed enterally, due to gastro-intestinal (GI) symptoms such as high gastric residual volumes (GRV) and diarrhea. Our aim was to describe the association of nutritional intake and GI symptoms during first 14 days of ICU admission.

METHODS

Observational study including critically ill adult COVID-19 patients. Data on nutritional intake [enteral nutrition (EN) or parenteral nutrition] and GI symptoms were collected during 14 days after ICU admission. Target energy and protein feeding goals were calculated conform ESPEN guidelines. GI symptoms included GRV (ml/d), vomiting, abdominal distension, and faeces (ml/d). High GRV's were classified as ≥2 times ≥150 ml/d and diarrhea as Bristol stool chart ≥6. GI symptoms were defined as mild if at least one symptom occurred and as moderate when ≥2 symptoms occurred. Acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grades of III were classified as GI dysfunction and grades of IV were considered as GI failure with severe impact on distant organs. Linear mixed model analysis was performed to explore the development of nutritional intake and GI symptoms over time at day (D) 0, 4, 10, and 14.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty patients were included [75% male; median age 64 years (IQR 54-70)]. BMI upon admission was 28 kg/m² (IQR 25-33), of which 43% obese (BMI > 30 kg/m²). Most patients received EN during admission (98% D4; 96% D10-14). Mean energy goals increased from 87% at D4 to 93% D10-14 and protein goals (g/kg) were increasingly achieved during admission (84% D4; 93% D10-14). Presence of moderate GI symptoms decreased (10% D0; 6% D4-10; 5% D14), reversely mild GI symptoms increased. Occurrence of GI dysfunction fluctuated (1% D0; 18% D4; 12% D10; 8% D14) and none of patients developed grade IV GI failure. Development of high GRV fluctuated (5% D0; 23% D4; 14% D10; 8% D14) and occurrence of diarrhea slightly increased during admission (5% D0; 22% D4; 25% D10; 27% D14). Linear mixed models showed only an association between AGI grades III and lower protein intake at day 10 (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Occurrence of GI symptoms was limited and seems no major barrier for EN in our group of critically COVID-19 patients. Nutritional intake was just below requirements during the first 14 days of ICU admission. The effect on nutritional status remains to be studied.

A scoping review considering potential biomarkers or functional measures of gastrointestinal dysfunction and enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill adults

BACKGROUND & AIM

Enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) as a result of gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction in critically ill adults can lead to suboptimal nutritional delivery, increasing the risk of hospital acquired malnutrition. There are no validated measures of EFI or consensus as to which measures could be used to define EFI. The aim of this scoping review is to explore the validity of biomarkers, physiological or functional measures of GI dysfunction and EFI in critically ill adults characterising their use in routine clinical practice to identify those with GI dysfunction to better guide nutritional support.

METHODS

Database searches were completed in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The search was performed until June 2022. Articles were included if they reported original studies that identify potential biomarkers or functional measures of EFI in critically ill adults. A nine-stage process was completed to extract and complete data synthesis.

RESULTS

139 unique articles were identified. Following review of titles and abstracts, 114 of these articles were excluded, three further articles were excluded after full text review and 22 articles met the inclusion criteria. A thematic analysis of the articles included identified three overarching themes of GI dysfunction: (1) Serum biomarkers, (2) Physiological markers, and (3) Functional markers. Within the category of serum biomarkers, a further three sub-categories were identified: (i) enterohormones, (ii) markers of enterocyte function, and iii) cytokines and neurotransmitters. Some associations were seen between EFI and heparin binding protein, intra-abdominal pressure, cholecystokinin and acetylcholine levels but no markers are currently suitable for daily clinical use.

CONCLUSIONS

Further larger studies are required to characterise the relationships between serum biomarkers, physiological and functional makers of GI dysfunction in critically ill adults. A robust definition of GI dysfunction should be included in any future research.

The association between parenteral nutrition and pancreatic injury in adult patients: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Patients on parenteral nutrition (PN) are at high risk of both liver and pancreatic injury. More efforts were focused on liver, however, limited data is available to evaluate the effects of PN on pancreas. Thus, we performed a retrospective observational study to evaluate the association between PN and pancreatic injury in Chinese adult patients.

METHODS

Adult patients (18-80 years), who received PN for a week or longer, and with repeated measurements of pancreatic enzymes, were included in the analysis. Pancreatic injury was confirmed by serum level of pancreatic amylase (P-AMYwas 53 U/L or higher) or lipase (LP was 63 U/L or higher), which were evaluated at baseline and following every week during PN duration. Age, sex, body weight, height, diagnosis of diseases, history of diseases, surgery, white blood cell, c-reactive protein, liver and renal function, fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, and daily energy supplied by PN and enteral nutrition were abstracted from medical records.

RESULTS

A total number of 190 adult patients (125 men, 65 women) were included in the study. The average age and BMI were 61.8 ± 13.0 years and 21.7±3.3 kg/m2, while medium serum level of P-AMY and LP were 29.0 U/L (quartile range: 18.0, 47.0) and 33.0 U/L (quartile range: 19.0, 58.0), respectively at baseline. The median duration of PN was 15 days (quartile range: 11.0, 21.0). The prevalence of pancreatic injury was 42.1% (80/190) while it was 28.4% (54/190), 43.3% (77/178), 47.8% (44/92) after one-, two-, and three-week or longer PN adminstration. The proportion of daily energy supplement by PN (OR = 3.77, 95%CI: 1.87, 7.61) and history of infection were positively (OR = 3.00, 95%CI: 1.23, 7.36), while disease history for diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.15, 0.98) and cancer (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.23, 0.95), were negetively associated with pancreatic injury. Total bile acids were associated with the increment of P-AMY (beta = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.39, 1.56) and LP (beta = 2.55, 95%CI: 0.98, 4.12) by multi-variate linear regression.

CONCLUSION

PN was associated with pancreatic injury, as demonstrated by the increase of both serum P-AMY and LP.

Gastrointestinal Dysmotility in Critically Ill Patients: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Common Misconceptions

Disruption of normal gastrointestinal (GI) function in critical illness is linked to increased morbidity and mortality, and GI dysmotility is frequently observed in patients who are critically ill. Despite its high prevalence, the diagnosis and management of GI motility problems in the intensive care unit remain very challenging, given that critically ill patients often cannot verbalize symptoms and the general lack of understanding of underlying pathophysiology. Common clinical presentations of GI dysmotility issues among critically ill patients include: (1) high gastric residual volumes, acid reflux, and vomiting, (2) abdominal distention, and (3) diarrhea. In this review, we discuss the differential diagnosis for intensive care unit patients with symptoms and signs concerning GI motility issues. There are many myths and longstanding misconceptions about the diagnosis and management of GI dysmotility in critical illness. Here, we uncover these myths and discuss relevant evidence in each subject area, with the goal of re-conceptualizing GI motility disorders in critical care and providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical care.

The effects of synbiotic supplementation on enteral feeding tolerance, protein homeostasis, and muscle wasting of critically ill adult patients: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Enteral feeding intolerance, energy-protein malnutrition, and muscle wasting are common conditions in the critical care setting. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of synbiotic supplementation on enteral feed volume, energy and protein homeostasis, and muscle mass maintenance in critically ill adult patients.

Methods

A consecutive of 42 patients admitted to the Edalatian Medical ICU, requiring enteral nutrition (EN), were prospectively randomized to receive the synbiotic capsule (containing a combination of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, and fructooligosaccharides) or placebo (21 patients in each group) for a maximum of 14 days. Enteral intolerance and energy homeostasis were evaluated on a daily basis. Nitrogen balance and 24-h urine creatinine excretion were recorded on days 1 and 14. Mid-arm circumference was recorded every 3 days.

Results

Mean EN volume, energy, and protein intake per day were 962.5 ± 533.82 ml, 770 ± 427.05 kcal, and 38.5 ± 21.35 g (fourth day) vs. 590 ± 321.1 ml, 472 ± 256.81 kcal, and 23.6 ± 12.84 g (first day) in the synbiotic group (p < 0.05). Changes in the placebo group were not statistically significant. On day 1, nitrogen balance (NB) was − 19.84 ± 8.03 in the synbiotic vs. − 10.99 ± 9.12 in the placebo group (p = 0.003). On day 14, NB was − 14.18 ± 13.05 in the synbiotic and − 9.59 ± 7.71 in the placebo group (p = 0.41). Mid-arm circumference (MAC), 24-h urine creatinine, and creatinine-height index were almost steady in the synbiotic group, while they decreased in the placebo group.

Conclusion

Overall, it can be concluded that enteral nutrition supplemented with synbiotics has no statistically significant effect on energy and protein homeostasis and muscle mass maintenance of critically ill patients on day 14, but it can increase enteral feed volume and energy and protein intake during the first 4 days of ICU admission.

Trial registration

The trial protocol has been approved in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials on March 17, 2019. The registration reference is IRCT20190227042857N1.

Early versus delayed enteral nutrition for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy undergoing therapeutic hypothermia: a randomized controlled trial

Background

The practice of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is widely used for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) despite its corresponding feeding strategies are still controversial. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated to evaluate the effect of early vs. delayed enteral nutrition on the incidence of feeding intolerance (FI) and other association during TH.

Methods

This single center, parallel-group, and no-blinded RCT was processed in a level III, and academic neonatal intensive care unit. Infants who were diagnosed with HIE and undertaken TH from September 2020 to August 2021 were enrolled. Participants were randomized to receive enteral nutrition either during TH/rewarming (early enteral nutrition, EEN) or after TH (delayed enteral nutrition, DEN) according to a recommend enteral feeding protocol. All data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 software with a p-value< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Ninety-two infants were enrolled after randomization, but 12 (13.04%) cases including 3 (3.26%) deaths were excluded from eventually analyzed, who did not initiate or discontinue the intervention. 80 cases (42 and 38 in the EEN and DEN group, respectively) who completed the interventions were eventually analyzed. Besides initial time of enteral feeds, two groups had processed the same feeding method. Total 23 (25.0%) cases developed FI, and no difference of morbidity was found between two groups (23.4% vs 26.7%, p = 0.595; Log Rank, p = 0.803). There was no case died or developed late-onset bloodstream and no difference of the incidence of hypoglycemia or weight gain was found (p > 0.05). The percentage of infants who had not reaching the goal of full enteral feeding volume between the two groups was similar (21.43% vs 23.68%, p = 0.809). The average time of parenteral nutrition, reaching full enteral feeds and hospital stay were shorter in the EEN group compared with the DEN group with significant differences (8.81 ± 1.67 vs 10.61 ± 2.06 days, p < 0.001; 9.91 ± 1.88 vs 12.24 ± 2.50 days, p < 0.001; 12.55 ± 4.57 vs 16.47 ± 5.27 days, p = 0.001 respectively).

Conclusions

Compared with delayed enteral nutrition, introduction of early enteral nutrition according to a recommend feeding strategy for neonatal HIE undergoing TH may be feasible and safe.FI is frequent in this high-risk group of infants which should not be ignored during feeding process.

Trial registration

The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry,ChiCTR2000038193, 2020-9-13, https://www.chictr.org.cn.

Prevalence and risk factors of enteral nutrition intolerance in intensive care unit patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Feeding intolerance (FI) among intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing early continuous enteral nutrition (EN) is related to poor outcomes. This study aimed to explore the prevalence and risk factors of FI in ICU patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 1057 patients who received early continuous EN via a nasogastric tube between January 2014 and August 2019. The prevalence of FI during the first 7 days of ICU stay was calculated, and the risk factors were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of FI during the first 7 days of ICU stay was 10.95%. FI occurred in 159 of 1057 (15.04%) patients on ICU day 2, 114 of 977 (11.67%) patients on ICU day 3, and 86 of 715 (12.03%) patients on ICU day 7. Mechanical ventilation (MV) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.928, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.064-3.493, P  = 0.03) was an independent risk factor for FI defined by a gastric residual volume (GRV) of 200 mL and/or vomiting, and acute renal failure (OR: 3.445, 95% CI: 1.115-10.707, P  = 0.032) was an independent risk factor of FI defined by a GRV of 500 mL and/or vomiting. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was an independent predictor regardless of the FI defined by a GRV of 200 mL (OR: 2.064, 95% CI: 1.233-3.456, P  = 0.006) or 500 mL (OR: 6.199, 95% CI: 2.108-18.228, P  = 0.001) in the ICU patients.

CONCLUSIONS

FI occurs frequently in early ICU days, especially in patients receiving MV and CRRT. However, further investigation of a consensus definition of FI and risk factors is still warranted in future studies.

Association of Gastric Antrum Echodensity and Acute Gastrointestinal Injury in Critically Ill Patients

(1) Background: Acute muscle inflammation leads to increased sonographic echodensity. We developed a technique to characterize the echodensity of the gastric antrum wall and assess its feasibility in evaluating the severity of acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI); (2) Methods: The B-mode images of the gastric antrum of each enrolled patient were obtained daily by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). The 50th percentile, 85th percentile, and mean value of the grayscale distribution according to histogram analysis (ED50, ED85, and EDmean, respectively) were used to characterize the gastric antrum echodensity. Consistency and correlation analyses were performed to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of gastric antrum echodensity measurement. The association of gastric antrum echodensity with the severity of AGI and its ability to predict feeding intolerance (FI) were analyzed; (3) Results: In total, 206 POCUS images of 43 patients were analyzed. The gastric antrum echodensity measurements had sufficient intra- and inter-investigator reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.9 for all parameters). The ED50 showed a significant upward trend as AGI severity increased, as well as ED85 and EDmean (p for trend <0.001, respectively). Patients who experienced FI had a higher ED50 (67.8 vs. 56.1, p = 0.02), ED85 (85.6 vs. 71.2, p = 0.01), and EDmean (70.3 vs. 57.6, p = 0.01) upon enteral feeding initiation; (4) Conclusions: Measurement of gastric antrum echodensity was technically feasible and reproducible in ventilated patients. Increased gastric antrum echodensity was associated with greater severity of AGI. Patients with higher gastric antrum echodensity upon enteral nutrition initiation via a nasogastric tube were more likely to develop FI.

Application Effect of Acupoint Massage on Zusanli on Premature Infants with Feeding Intolerance and Their Clinical Symptoms

FI is mainly caused by functional disturbance in premature infants, which greatly poses a threat to their growth and development, so a large number of studies on the clinical features of FI should be conducted to provide theoretical support for treatment. The purpose of the study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of acupoint massage on Zusanli on premature infants with feeding intolerance (FI) and their clinical symptoms. A total of 60 premature infants with FI admitted to our hospital over the past two years were selected as the FI group, and another 60 premature infants without FI were selected as the control group. The birthweight and gestational age of the premature infants in the FI group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.001), whereas there were no significant differences in general information of the premature infants between the two groups (P > 0.05). Vomiting, abdominal distension, and gastric retention are the main clinical symptoms of premature infants with FI, and acupoint massage on Zusanli combined with routine treatment can effectively improve digestive function, relieve clinical symptoms, and shorten treatment time of premature infants with FI, which is worthy of application and promotion in clinical practice.

A guide to enteral nutrition in intensive care units: 10 expert tips for the daily practice

The preferential use of the oral/enteral route in critically ill patients over gut rest is uniformly recommended and applied. This article provides practical guidance on enteral nutrition in compliance with recent American and European guidelines. Low-dose enteral nutrition can be safely started within 48 h after admission, even during treatment with small or moderate doses of vasopressor agents. A percutaneous access should be used when enteral nutrition is anticipated for ≥ 4 weeks. Energy delivery should not be calculated to match energy expenditure before day 4–7, and the use of energy-dense formulas can be restricted to cases of inability to tolerate full-volume isocaloric enteral nutrition or to patients who require fluid restriction. Low-dose protein (max 0.8 g/kg/day) can be provided during the early phase of critical illness, while a protein target of > 1.2 g/kg/day could be considered during the rehabilitation phase. The occurrence of refeeding syndrome should be assessed by daily measurement of plasma phosphate, and a phosphate drop of 30% should be managed by reduction of enteral feeding rate and high-dose thiamine. Vomiting and increased gastric residual volume may indicate gastric intolerance, while sudden abdominal pain, distension, gastrointestinal paralysis, or rising abdominal pressure may indicate lower gastrointestinal intolerance.

The intensivist's assessment of gastrointestinal function: A pilot study

Gastrointestinal dysfunction/failure (GDF) is a common cause of concern in critically ill patients. Although the gut plays an important role in the genesis of organ failure, its exclusion from organ severity scoring systems has made it challenging for intensivists to score it sufficiently at the bedside. We aimed to survey intensive care specialists about their perceptions, attitudes, and approaches towards the assessment of the gut in Australia and New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs). An electronic (online) questionnaire was used to survey intensive care specialists from the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS). The survey comprised 10 questions focused on four key areas: (i) the extent of the problem with GDF in ICUs, (ii) the use and reliability of the current gut scoring tools, (iii) personal approaches and practices associated with GDF assessment, and (4) potential value of a novel GDF scoring system and its incorporation into an organ severity score. Our results showed that GDF was a significant concern amongst ICUs in Australia and New Zealand intensivists (84%; 66/79), with a small number of participants (14%; 3/79) using a gut scoring tool in their ICUs. Despite this, we have no established objective scoring tool for its assessment. The survey highlighted the need for developing a novel scoring tool to assess the gut was considered important amongst majority of the intensivists (92%; 72/78), which would prove useful in clinical practice and potentially lead to incorporation into an organ severity score in the future.

Feeding intolerance and risk of poor outcome in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

We conducted a prospective, observational study to determine the incidence of feeding intolerance (FI) within 7 d of initiating enteral nutrition (EN) in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and to evaluate the association between FI and a poor prognosis. Patients who underwent CPB surgery at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between March 2020 and June 2020 were enrolled. According to the presence or absence of FI within 7 d after EN, patients were divided into FI and non-FI groups. According to the occurrence of a poor prognosis (death, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, acute kidney injury, liver insufficiency, neurological events (cerebral infarction, cerebral haemorrhage and epilepsy) and prolonged mechanical ventilation (> 48 h)), patients were divided into poor prognosis and good prognosis groups. The mean age of the 237 CPB patients, including 139 men and ninety-eight women, was 53·80 (sd 12·25) years. The incidence of FI was 64·14 %. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed factors independently associated with poor prognosis after CPB included FI (OR 2·138; 95 % CI 1·058, 4·320), age (OR 1·033; 95 % CI 1·004, 1·063), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV cardiac function (OR 2·410; 95 % CI 1·079, 5·383), macrovascular surgery (OR 5·434; 95 % CI 1·704, 17·333) and initial sequential organ failure assessment score (OR 1·243; 95 % CI 1·010, 1·530). Thus, the incidence of FI within 7 d of EN after CPB was high, which was associated with a poor prognosis.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Consequence of Enteral Feeding Intolerance in the Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill: An Analysis of a Multicenter, Multiyear Database

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of enteral feed intolerance, identify factors associated with enteral feed intolerance, and assess the relationship between enteral feed intolerance and key nutritional and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Analysis of International Nutrition Survey database collected prospectively from 2007 to 2014.

SETTING

Seven-hundred eighty-five ICUs from around the world.

PATIENTS

Mechanically ventilated adults with ICU stay greater than or equal to 72 hours and received enteral nutrition during the first 12 ICU days.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

We defined enteral feed intolerance as interrupted feeding due to one of the following reasons: high gastric residual volumes, increased abdominal girth, distension, subjective discomfort, emesis, or diarrhea. The current analysis included 15,918 patients. Of these, 4,036 (24%) had at least one episode of enteral feed intolerance. The enteral feed intolerance rate increased from 1% on day 1 to 6% on days 4 and 5 and declined daily thereafter. After controlling for site and patient covariates, burn (odds ratio 1.46; 95% CIs, 1.07-1.99), gastrointestinal (odds ratio 1.45; 95% CI, 1.27-1.66), and sepsis (odds ratio 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17-1.54) admission diagnoses were more likely to develop enteral feed intolerance, as compared to patients with respiratory-related admission diagnosis. enteral feed intolerance patients received about 10% less enteral nutrition intake, as compared to patients without enteral feed intolerance after controlling for important covariates including severity of illness. Enteral feed intolerance patients had fewer ventilator-free days and longer ICU length of stay time to discharge alive (all p < 0.0001). The daily mortality hazard rate increased by a factor of 1.5 (1.4-1.6; p < 0.0001) once enteral feed intolerance occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteral feed intolerance occurs frequently during enteral nutrition delivery in the critically ill. Burn and gastrointestinal patients had the highest risk of developing enteral feed intolerance. Enteral feed intolerance is associated with lower enteral nutrition delivery and worse clinical outcomes. Identification, prevention, and optimal management of enteral feed intolerance may improve nutrition delivery and clinical outcomes in important "at risk" populations.

Effect of gut microbiota modulation on feeding tolerance of enterally fed critically ill adult patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of pre-, pro-, and synbiotics on feeding tolerance of enterally fed critically ill adult patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Science Direct, Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to November 2019. English language randomized controlled trials reporting the effect of pre, pro or synbiotics on the feeding tolerance of enterally fed critically ill adult patients were included.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 papers were selected for review. Among six studies reporting the energy intake, only two studies showed significantly higher energy intake in the prebiotic-receiving groups. Among four RCTs reporting frequency or time to achieve the target calorie, only one found a significant effect of probiotics to reduce the time to achieve a target dose of calorie. About the prevalence or duration of diarrhea, 7 out of 12 RCTs reported a beneficial effect. All but one study found no beneficial effects for gut microbiota manipulation on clinical endpoints including length of stay (LOS) in hospital and intensive care unit (ICU).

CONCLUSION

It should be noticed that the heterogeneity in study designs, product format, and ICU patient populations makes it difficult to draw any general conclusion. Overall, it seems that pre, pro, or synbiotics have no significant beneficial effect on feeding tolerance and clinical endpoints in critically ill adults, but they may reduce the prevalence or duration of diarrhea.

Are Classic Bedside Exam Findings Required to Initiate Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients: Emphasis on Bowel Sounds and Abdominal Distension

The general physical examination of a patient is an axiom of critical care medicine, but evidence to support this practice remains sparse. Given the lack of evidence for a comprehensive physical examination of the entire patient on admission to the intensive care unit, which most clinicians consider an essential part of care, should clinicians continue the practice of a specialized gastrointestinal system physical examination when commencing enteral nutrition in critically ill patients? In this review of literature related to gastrointestinal system examination in critically ill patients, the focus is on gastrointestinal sounds and abdominal distension. There is a summary of what these physical features represent, an evaluation of the evidence regarding use of these physical features in patients after abdominal surgery, exploration of the rationale for and against using the physical findings in routine practice, and detail regarding what is known about each feature in critically ill patients. Based on the available evidence, it is recommended that an isolated symptom, sign, or bedside test does not provide meaningful information. However, it is submitted that a comprehensive physical assessment of the gastrointestinal system still has a role when initiating or administering enteral nutrition: specifically, when multiple features are present, clinicians should consider further investigation or intervention.

Gastrointestinal complications are associated with a poor outcome in non-critically ill pneumonia patients

Background

Development of gastrointestinal (GI) complications is adversely associated with prognosis in the critically ill. However, little is known about their impact on the outcome of non-critically ill patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the incidence of GI complications and their influence on prognosis of hospitalized pneumonia patients.

Methods

Adult patients admitted with a diagnosis of pneumonia from 2012 to 2014 were included. Medical records were reviewed to obtain patients’ demographics, physical signs, comorbidities, laboratory results, clinical events, and the Confusion, Urea, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure and age ≥ 65 (CURB-65) score was calculated to assess the severity of pneumonia. GI complications, including bowel distension, diarrhea, GI bleeding and ileus, were evaluated during the first 3 days of hospitalization and their association with patient outcomes, such as hospital mortality and length of stay, was analyzed.

Results

A total of 1001 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 73.7 years and 598 (59%) male. Among them, 114 (11%) patients experienced at least one GI complication and diarrhea (5.2%) was the most common. The hospital mortality was 14% and was independently associated with an increase in the CURB-65 score (odds ratio [OR] 1.952 per point increase; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.516–2.514), comorbid malignancy (OR 1.943; 95% CI 1.209–3.123), development of septic shock (OR 25.896; 95% CI 8.970–74.765), and the presence of any GI complication (OR 1.753; 95% CI 1.003–3.065).

Conclusions

Compared to a critical care setting, GI complications are not commonly observed in a non-critical care setting; however, they still have a negative impact on prognosis of pneumonia patients, including higher mortality and prolonged length of hospital stay.