Chemotherapy of prostate cancer: present and future

Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis and actions contributes to the beneficial effects of calcitriol in prostate cancer

Our research is aimed at obtaining a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the anti-proliferative and cancer preventive effects of calcitriol with the goal of developing strategies to improve the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). In PCa cells calcitriol inhibits the synthesis and biological actions of prostaglandins (PGs) by three actions: (i) the inhibition of the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), the enzyme that synthesizes PGs, (ii) the upregulation of the expression of 15-prostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH), the enzyme that inactivates PGs and (iii) decreasing the expression of EP and FP PG receptors that are essential for PG signaling. Since PGs have been shown to promote carcinogenesis and progression of multiple cancers, we hypothesize that the inhibition of the PG pathway contributes to the ability of calcitriol to prevent or inhibit PCa development and growth. We have shown that the combination of calcitriol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) result in a synergistic inhibition of the growth of PCa cell cultures and this combination therapy offers a potential therapeutic strategy. These findings led us to embark on a clinical trial combining the non-selective NSAID naproxen with calcitriol in men with early recurrent PCa. The results indicate that the combination of high dose weekly calcitriol with naproxen slows the rate of rise (doubling time) of PSA in most patients indicating the slowing of disease progression. Further studies are warranted to determine the role of this combination therapy in the management of recurrent PCa.

Cancer stem cells-clinical relevance

Therapeutic advances over the past three decades now allow most cancer patients to achieve major clinical responses. Although clinical responses can clearly decrease side effects and improve quality of life, most cancer patients still eventually relapse and die of their disease. Many cancers have now been shown to harbor cells that are phenotypically and biologically similar to normal cells with self-renewal capacity; these so-called cancer stem cells (CSC) typically constitute only a small fraction of the total tumor burden, but theoretically harbor all the self-renewal capacity. Moreover, the CSC appears to be relatively resistant to standard anticancer therapies by co-opting normal stem cells' intrinsic defense mechanisms, such as quiescence, efflux pumps, and detoxifying enzymes. However, the clinical importance of CSC, if any, remains unproven. Nevertheless, emerging evidence suggests that initial responses in cancer represent therapeutic effectiveness against the bulk cancer cells, while the rare CSC is responsible for relapse. Better understanding of the biology of CSC, as well as reexamining both our preclinical and clinical drug development paradigms to include the CSC concept, has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of many cancers.

Calcitriol as a chemopreventive and therapeutic agent in prostate cancer: role of anti-inflammatory activity

Calcitriol, the hormonally active form of vitamin D, inhibits the growth and development of several cancers. Inflammation has been implicated in the development and progression of many cancers, including prostate cancer (PCa). Recent research from our laboratory suggests that calcitriol exhibits anti-inflammatory actions that may contribute to its inhibitory effects in PCa. We found that calcitriol inhibits the synthesis and actions of pro-inflammatory prostaglandins (PGs) by three mechanisms: (1) inhibition of the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), the enzyme that synthesizes PGs, (2) induction of the expression of 15-prostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH), the enzyme that inactivates PGs, and (3) decreasing the expression of prostaglandin E and prostaglandin F PG receptors, which are the mediators of PG signaling. The combination of calcitriol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) result in a synergistic inhibition of PCa cell growth and offers a potential therapeutic strategy. Acting on a separate anti-inflammatory pathway, calcitriol induces the expression of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase 5 (MKP5), a member of a family of phosphatases that are negative regulators of MAP kinases, causing the selective dephosphorylation and inactivation of the stress-activated protein kinase p38. Because p38 activation may be both procarcinogenic and promote inflammation, this calcitriol action, especially coupled with the inhibition of the PG pathway, may contribute to the chemopreventive activity of calcitriol. We conclude that calcitriol exerts several anti-inflammatory actions in prostate cells, which contribute to its potential as a chemopreventive and therapeutic agent in PCa.

Novel pathways that contribute to the anti-proliferative and chemopreventive activities of calcitriol in prostate cancer

Calcitriol, the hormonally active form of Vitamin D, inhibits the growth and development of many cancers through multiple mechanisms. Our recent research supports the contributory role of several new and diverse pathways that add to the mechanisms already established as playing a role in the actions of calcitriol to inhibit the development and progression of prostate cancer (PCa). Calcitriol increases the expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), which plays a critical role in the inhibition of PCa cell growth by increasing the expression of the cell cycle inhibitor p21. Calcitriol inhibits the prostaglandin (PG) pathway by three actions: (i) the inhibition of the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), the enzyme that synthesizes PGs, (ii) the induction of the expression of 15-prostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH), the enzyme that inactivates PGs and (iii) decreasing the expression of EP and FP PG receptors that are essential for PG signaling. Since PGs have been shown to promote carcinogenesis and progression of multiple cancers, the inhibition of the PG pathway may add to the ability of calcitriol to prevent and inhibit PCa development and growth. The combination of calcitriol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) result in a synergistic inhibition of PCa cell growth and offers a potential therapeutic strategy. Mitogen activated protein kinase phosphatase 5 (MKP5) is a member of a family of phosphatases that are negative regulators of MAP kinases. Calcitriol induces MKP5 expression in prostate cells leading to the selective dephosphorylation and inactivation of the stress-activated kinase p38. Since p38 activation is pro-carcinogenic and is a mediator of inflammation, this calcitriol action, especially coupled with the inhibition of the PG pathway, contributes to the chemopreventive activity of calcitriol in PCa. Mullerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) has been evaluated for its inhibitory effects in cancers of the reproductive tissues and is in development as an anti-cancer drug. Calcitriol induces MIS expression in prostate cells revealing yet another mechanism contributing to the anti-cancer activity of calcitriol in PCa. Thus, we conclude that calcitriol regulates myriad pathways that contribute to the potential chemopreventive and therapeutic utility of calcitriol in PCa.

Cancer Stem Cells: From Bench to Bedside

Objective clinical responses to anticancer treatments often do not translate into substantial improvements in overall survival. Recent data suggesting many cancers arise from rare self-renewing cells (cancer stem cells) that are biologically distinct from their more numerous differentiated progeny, may explain this paradox. Current anticancer therapies have been developed to target the bulk of the tumor mass (i.e., the differentiated cancer cells). Although treatments directed against the bulk of the cancer may produce dramatic responses, they are unlikely to result in long-term remissions if the rare cancer stem cells are also not targeted. Better understanding the biology of cancer stem cells as well reexamining both our preclinical and clinical drug development paradigms to include the cancer stem cell concept, have the potential to revolutionize the treatment of many cancers.

The anti-tumor efficacy of a GM-CSF-secreting tumor cell vaccine is not inhibited by docetaxel administration

Docetaxel has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy against breast, prostate, and ovarian cancer and other solid tumors. The tumoricidal activity of docetaxel is mainly attributed to its ability to block microtubule depolymerization, thus inducing G(2)-M arrest and apoptosis. Mounting evidence indicates that docetaxel also possesses immunomodulatory activity such as augmenting macrophage and lymphokine activated killer activity and inducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, suggesting that docetaxel may be a good chemotherapeutic agent to combine with cancer immunotherapies, assuming that it does not inhibit the vaccine-induced immune response. The anti-tumor activity of the combination of docetaxel and a GM-CSF-secreting B16F10 tumor cell vaccine (B16.GM) was evaluated in the murine B16 melanoma model. Dose levels of docetaxel and the B16.GM vaccine known to be ineffective when used as single agents were selected. Three iv treatments of 6 mg/kg docetaxel per injection given on days 5, 9, and 13 after tumor challenge or a single vaccination with 2-3 x 10(6) B16.GM cells on day 3 were ineffective at inhibiting tumor growth when used as single agents [median survival time (MST)=24 days in both treatment groups and in control animals]. However, combination of docetaxel and B16.GM vaccine significantly delayed tumor growth, increasing MST to 45 days. A similar improvement in anti-tumor efficacy was observed using multiple treatment cycles of the B16.GM vaccine/docetaxel combination. Administration of docetaxel every 4 days between bi-weekly B16.GM vaccinations increased the median survival of tumor-bearing mice from 31 to 52 days compared to multiple B16.GM vaccinations alone. In summary, these data demonstrate that rather than inhibiting the anti-tumor effects of a GM-CSF-secreting tumor cell vaccine, docetaxel combined with a whole cell vaccine significantly inhibits tumor growth, increases survival time and does not impede T-cell activation in the murine B16F10 melanoma tumor model. GM-secreting tumor cell vaccines in combination with docetaxel may represent a new strategy for combining chemo and immunotherapy for cancer.

Targeting and killing of prostate cancer cells using lentiviral constructs containing a sequence recognized by translation factor eIF4E and a prostate-specific promoter

To develop a gene therapy that would selectively kill prostate cancer cells while sparing normal cells, we have constructed lentiviral vectors that contain a therapeutic gene with a short DNA sequence in the 5'-untranslated region (UTR) that is recognized by the translation initiation factor, eIF4E, which is often overexpressed in malignant cells. Infection of cancer (LNCaP, PC-3M, DU145, and MCF-7 cells) and noncancer cell lines (BPH-1, 267-B1, Plat-E, and Huvec-c cells) with lentivirus having a CMV-promoter and EGFP reporter resulted in high levels of EGFP expression in all cells, whereas, inclusion of the eIF4E UTR recognition sequence restricted high expression to cancer cells and Plat-E cells, which also express substantial levels of eIF4E. Infection of the cells with lentiviral vectors having this UTR in front of the HSV thymidine kinase suicide gene resulted in differential sensitivity to the killing effects of ganciclovir, with at least 100-fold more drug required to kill noncancer cells than cancer cells. Furthermore, in experiments where the CMV promoter was replaced by the prostate-specific ARR(2)PB promoter, the killing effects of ganciclovir were restricted to prostate cancer cells and not seen in nonprostate cancer cells. Our results indicate that combined translational regulation, by incorporation of an eIF4E-UTR recognition sequence into a therapeutic gene, together with transcriptional regulation with a prostate-specific promoter, may provide a means to selectively destroy prostate cancer cells while sparing normal prostate cells.

Strategies to eliminate cancer stem cells: clinical implications

Over the past two decades, major advances in our understanding of cancer have translated into only modest increments in survival for the majority of cancer patients. Recent data suggesting cancers arise from rare self-renewing stem cells that are biologically distinct from their more numerous differentiated progeny may explain this paradox. Current anticancer therapies have been developed to decrease the bulk of the tumour mass (i.e. the differentiated cancer cells). Although treatments directed against the bulk of the cancer may produce dramatic responses, they are unlikely to result in long-term remissions if the rare cancer stem cells are also not targeted. Conversely, treatments that selectively attack cancer stem cells will not immediately eliminate the differentiated cancer cells, and might therefore be prematurely abandoned if clinical activity is judged solely by traditional response criteria that reflect changes in the bulk of the tumour. Re-examining both our pre-clinical and clinical drug development paradigms to include the cancer stem cell concept has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of many cancers.

The paradox of response and survival in cancer therapeutics

Although most patients with cancer respond to therapy, few are cured. Moreover, objective clinical responses to treatment often do not even translate into substantial improvements in overall survival. For example, patients with indolent lymphoma who achieved a complete remission with conventional-dose therapies in the prerituximab era did not experience a survival advantage over similar patients treated with a "watch and wait" approach. Several studies have also shown that neither the magnitude nor the kinetics of clinical response has an impact on survival in multiple myeloma. Recent data suggesting many malignancies arise from a rare population of cells that exclusively maintains the ability to self-renew and sustains the tumor (ie, "cancer stem cells") may help explain this paradox that response and survival are not always linked. Therapies that successfully eliminate the differentiated cancer cells characterizing the tumor may be ineffective against rare, biologically distinct cancer stem cells. New methods for assessing treatment efficacy must also be developed, as traditional response criteria measure tumor bulk and may not reflect changes in rare cancer stem cell populations. In this article, we discuss the evidence for cancer stem cells in hematologic malignancies and possible ways to begin targeting these cells and measuring clinical effectiveness of such treatment approaches.