GLP-1 receptor agonists and risk of cancer in type 2 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist use and risk of thyroid cancer: Scandinavian cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether use of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists is associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer.

DESIGN

Scandinavian cohort study.

SETTING

Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, 2007-21.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who started GLP1 receptor agonist treatment were compared with patients who started dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor treatment, and in an additional analysis, patients who started sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Thyroid cancer identified from nationwide cancer registers. An active-comparator new user study design was used to minimise risks of confounding and time related biases from using real world studies of drug effects. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios, controlling for potential confounders with propensity score weighting.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 3.9 years (standard deviation 3.5 years) in the GLP1 receptor agonist group and 5.4 years (standard deviation 3.5 years) in the DPP4 inhibitor group. 76 of 145 410 patients (incidence rate 1.33 events per 10 000 person years) treated with GLP1 receptor agonists and 184 of 291 667 patients (incidence rate 1.46 events per 10 000 person years) treated with DPP4 inhibitors developed thyroid cancer. GLP1 receptor agonist use was not associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.31; rate difference -0.13, 95% confidence interval -0.61 to 0.36 events per 10 000 person years). The hazard ratio for medullary thyroid cancer was 1.19 (0.37 to 3.86). In the additional analysis comparing the GLP1 receptor agonist group with the SGLT2 inhibitor group, the hazard ratio for thyroid cancer was 1.16 (0.65 to 2.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort study using nationwide data from three countries, GLP1 receptor agonist use was not associated with a substantially increased risk of thyroid cancer over a mean follow-up of 3.9 years. In the main analysis comparing GLP1 receptor agonists with DPP4 inhibitors, the upper limit of the confidence interval was consistent with no more than a 31% increase in relative risk.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Thyroid Cancer: A Narrative Review

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are highly effective medications for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Pharmacological studies in rodents support an association between the use of GLP-1 RAs and the development of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) resulting in a black box warning for these agents in patients at risk for this condition. Yet, the association between GLP-1 RAs and non-MTC remains controversial. Excessive worry about unproven thyroid cancer risk might lead to underutilizing GLP-1 RAs in patients who could otherwise experience substantial benefits. Unwarranted concerns about thyroid cancer could lead to unnecessary thyroid cancer screening and harms from overdiagnosis. Summary: The body of evidence assessing the association between GLP-1 RA use and thyroid cancer spans a wide range of methodologies, including basic and translational research investigating biological plausibility; randomized trials assessing clinical efficacy and providing the strongest evidence for causality; observational studies providing real-life outcome evaluation in larger populations but with limited evaluation of covariates or dependable outcome definitions; and pharmacovigilance studies that provide postmarketing assessments of a safety signal but do not address causality. There is biological plausibility supporting an association between GLP-1 RA and MTC in rodents, which is less clear for non-MTC in humans. Clinical evidence from randomized trials and associated meta-analysis suggest thyroid cancer as a rare event making effect estimates imprecise but without conclusive and consistent evidence of increase risk in those receiving GLP-1 RA. Observational studies at higher risk of bias also show low event rates for thyroid cancer, with effect estimates that are inconsistent among different studies. Pharmacovigilance studies consistently show a signal of increased reporting of thyroid cancer in patients treated with GLP-1 RA. Conclusions: Evidence from randomized controlled trials indicates occurrence of thyroid cancer is infrequent in individuals exposed to GLP-1 RA. Observational studies at higher risk of bias yield inconsistent results. Overall there is no conclusive evidence of elevated thyroid cancer risk. These findings can help clinicians when addressing patient's concerns about a potential yet unproven link between GLP-1 RA therapy and thyroid cancer.

Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors, DPP-4 Inhibitors, and Metformin in Pancreatic Cancer Prevention

Pancreatic carcinoma is a highly aggressive tumor that usually presents when it has already metastasized. Therapeutic options for cure remain scarce and rely on combination chemotherapy with limited sustainability. Diabetes is considered an important risk factor for the development of pancreatic cancer due to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, which result in increased cell proliferation. More than half of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer eventually develop diabetes due to the destruction of insulin-producing cells. The interlinkage of both diseases might identify a possible preventative strategy for reducing the incidence of pancreatic carcinoma. This study reviewed the recent literature on the association between pancreatic cancer risk and SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 RA, DPP-4 inhibitors, and biguanides. There are mixed data regarding the relationship between GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 inhibitors and pancreatic cancer, with some trials suggesting that they might increase the risk. In contrast, studies have mostly revealed that SGLT2 inhibitors have an antiproliferative effect on various tumors, such as liver, pancreatic, prostate, bowel, lung, and breast carcinoma, which might be due to their mechanism of blockage of reabsorption of glucose by cells, lowering the amount of available glucose for the growth of tumor cells. Metformin, the first-line agent for diabetes, has also been shown to be associated with decreasing pancreatic cancer risk and improving prognosis in those who already have the disease. Dedicated trials are needed to further delineate the association of antidiabetic drugs with the risk of pancreatic cancer in the general population, as previous studies have mostly focused on diabetic patients.

Safety and efficacy of the new, oral, small-molecule, GLP-1 receptor agonists orforglipron and danuglipron for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

The present systematic review aimed to synthesize available data from recently published randomized trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of the novel, orally administered, small-molecule glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) orforglipron and danuglipron for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity or both.

METHODS

Literature search was performed through Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library and Scopus until August 16, 2023. Double-independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled with random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Totally, 1037 patients among seven RCTs were analyzed. All RCTs had low risk of bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool (RoB2). Novel GLP-1RAs led to significant reduction in HbA1c in patients with T2DM compared to controls (MD = -1.03 %; 95 % CI = [-1.29, -0.77]; P < 0.001). A significantly greater weight reduction was also noted both in patients with T2DM or obesity compared to controls (MD = -3.26 kg; 95 % CI = [-4.79, -1.72]; P < 0.001 and MD = -7.52 kg; 95 % CI = [-14.63, -0.41]; P = 0.038, respectively; P for subgroup differences = 0.25). Regarding safety, novel GLP-1RAs showed a neutral effect on the odds of severe hypoglycemia or serious adverse events (OR = 0.34; 95 % CI = [0.09, 1.31]; P = 0.11 and OR = 0.95; 95 % CI = [0.39, 2.34]; P = 0.91, respectively) and significantly higher odds of gastrointestinal, treatment-emergent adverse events (OR = 2.57; 95 % CI = [1.49, 4.42]; P < 0.001) and adverse events leading to discontinuation (OR = 2.89; 95 % CI = [1.22, 6.87]; P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary evidence supports that orforglipron and danuglipron are efficient in glycemic control and weight reduction in T2DM, obesity or both. More longitudinal research is warranted in order to provide deeper insights into their efficacy, safety and tolerability before their potential incorporation in the pharmacological arsenal against T2DM or obesity.

A novel risk factor for malignancy: Albuminuria

Cancer is the second leading cause of death among the adult population following cardiovascular diseases. Prevention and earlier diagnosis are among the cornerstones in the management of malignancies. Albuminuria is a diagnostic criterion for chronic kidney disease and has been associated with multiple conditions including cardiovascular diseases and systemic inflammation while the association between albuminuria and malignancy has been inadequately addressed. Large-scale observational studies with long follow-up periods demonstrate a statistically significant association between albuminuria and overall malignancy incidence, especially urothelial malignancy incidence. However, the underlying pathophysiology linking these two entities is not a straightforward causal relationship but most likely a multidirectional relationship including a causal link. In this narrative review, we evaluate the clinical studies investigating the association between albuminuria and malignancy along with potential underlying mechanisms linking them. We also summarize data on the impact of treatment modalities prescribed for albuminuria and/or proteinuria on the prevention or prognosis of malignancies.

Novel Treatments for Obesity: Implications for Cancer Prevention and Treatment

It is now established that obesity is related to a higher incidence of cancer during a lifespan. The effective treatment of obesity opens up new perspectives in the treatment of a relevant modifiable cancer risk factor. The present narrative review summarizes the correlations between weight loss in obesity and cancer. The current knowledge between obesity treatment and cancer was explored, highlighting the greatest potential for its use in the treatment of cancer in the clinical setting. Evidence for the effects of obesity therapy on proliferation, apoptosis, and response to chemotherapy is summarized. While more studies, including large, long-term clinical trials, are needed to adequately evaluate the relationship and durability between anti-obesity treatment and cancer, collaboration between oncologists and obesity treatment experts is increasingly important.

The role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

INTRODUCTION

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a highly prevalent disease, associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, which can lead to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in some patients. Apart from lifestyle modifications, which are the cornerstone for its management, several drugs are under evaluation, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-R1RAs). In this review, we summarized major clinical data concerning the effects of GLP-1RAs on NAFLD, trying to highlight existing knowledge and to elucidate areas of uncertainty, thus providing clues to potential clinical implications and research.

AREAS COVERED

Selected clinical studies on GLP-R1As in NAFLD are presented in this narrative review.

EXPERT OPINION

There is evidence that treatment with GLP-R1As in NAFLD has beneficial effects on NAFLD, i.e. improvement in liver function tests and histological improvement in hepatic steatosis and inflammation, but not fibrosis. Further research is required toward the early use of GLP-R1Αs, i.e. in NAFLD patients without fibrosis to evaluate whether they may prevent the progression to fibrosis, or in patients with advanced disease in combination with other medications, which may have additive or even synergistic effects on NAFLD.

Obesity, metabolic and bariatric surgery, and cancer prevention: what do we need to learn and how do we get there?

Obesity and associated metabolic dysfunction are on the rise in the United States and around the world. Metabolic dysfunction often leads to chronic disease, including cancer. Recent evidence suggests that weight loss among individuals with obesity may decrease cancer risk. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) leads to greater maximum and sustained weight loss than nonsurgical dietary strategies and demonstrates the most convincing evidence that weight loss lowers cancer risk. Caloric restriction diets combined with GLP-1 receptor agonists demonstrate weight loss intermediate between MBS and other nonsurgical diet strategies so long as individuals consistently take the medication. Weight regain after initial loss is a major problem with all weight loss strategies. To better prevent cancer in individuals with obesity, we need to individualize weight loss strategies, determining what strategy works for a given individual and how to implement it. We need to learn (1) what an individual's impediments to initial and sustained weight loss are; (2) what the optimal weight loss strategy, be it diet modification, diet modification + medication, or MBS followed by diet modification, is; (3) how exercise(s) should be incorporated into weight loss strategies; (4) where medications fit into the treatment strategy of individuals with obesity; and (5) what the mechanisms driving the influence of MBS on cancer risk are. We also need to (6) explore expanding the eligibility of MBS to individuals with a body mass index <35 kg/m2. Answers to these questions require a better understanding of how MBS impacts cancer risk, including in which groups (women versus men, which racial and ethnic groups, which cancers, which MBS procedure) MBS works best to reduce risk. The National Cancer Institute, through new funding opportunities, hopes to advance our understanding of how obesity drives cancer risk and how individuals with obesity can prevent cancer development and, among those with cancer, prevent disease recurrence.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Obese Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: from Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Considerations and Practical Recommendations for Safe and Effective Use

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss current literature and provide practical recommendations for the safe and effective use of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and/or obesity. The molecular mechanisms that justify the potential benefits of GLP-1 RA in IBD and the links between IBD, obesity, and cardiovascular disease are also discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Preliminary data suggest that GLP-1 RA can modulate crucial pathways in the pathogenesis of IBD, such as chronic inflammation circuits, intestinal tight junctions, and gut microbiome dysbiosis, setting the stage for human trials to investigate the role of these agents in the treatment of IBD among people with or without diabetes and obesity. However, gastrointestinal side effects related to GLP-1 RA need appropriate clinical management to mitigate risks and maximize the benefits of therapy in people with IBD. GLP-1 RA originally emerged as drugs for the treatment of hyperglycemia and are currently licensed for the management of T2D and/or overweight/obesity. However, their wealth of pleiotropic actions soon raised expectations that they might confer benefits on non-metabolic disorders. Future studies are expected to clarify whether GLP-1 RA deserve an adjunct place in the arsenal of drugs against IBD.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and the potential risk of pancreatic carcinoma: a pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and literature visualization analysis

BACKGROUND

There are increasing data on the potential risk of pancreatic carcinoma associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs).

AIM

The study aimed to determine whether GLP-1RAs are associated with increased detection of pancreatic carcinoma based on the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System and clarify its potential mechanisms through keyword co-occurrence analysis from literature database.

METHOD

Disproportionality and Bayesian analyses were used for signal detection using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), information component (IC), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM). Mortality, life-threatening events, and hospitalizations were also investigated. VOSviewer was adopted to generate visual analysis of keyword hotspots.

RESULTS

A total of 3073 pancreatic carcinoma cases were related to GLP-1RAs. Five GLP-1RAs were detected with signals for pancreatic carcinoma. Liraglutide had the strongest signal detection (ROR 54.45, 95% CI 51.21-57.90; PRR 52.52, 95% CI 49.49-55.73; IC 5.59; EBGM 48.30). The signals of exenatide (ROR 37.32, 95% CI 35.47-39.28; PRR 36.45, 95% CI 34.67-38.32; IC 5.00; EBGM 32.10) and lixisenatide (ROR 37.07, 95% CI 9.09-151.09; PRR 36.09; 95% CI 9.20-141.64; IC 5.17, EBGM 36.09) were stronger than those of semaglutide (ROR 7.43, 95% CI 5.22-10.57; PRR 7.39; 95% CI 5.20-10.50; IC 2.88, EBGM 7.38) and dulaglutide (ROR 6.47, 95% CI 5.56-7.54; PRR 6.45; 95% CI 5.54-7.51; IC 2.67, EBGM 6.38). The highest mortality rate occurred in exenatide (63.6%). Based on the bibliometric investigation, cAMP/protein-kinase, Ca²⁺ channel, endoplasmic-reticulum stress, and oxidative stress are potential pathogenesis of pancreatic carcinoma resulting from GLP-1RAs.

CONCLUSION

Based on this pharmacovigilance study, GLP-1RAs, except albiglutide, are associated with pancreatic carcinoma.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies of the association between the use of incretin-based therapies and the risk of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Some early reports in the medical literature have raised concern about a possible increased risk of pancreatic cancer associated with the use of two broad classes of incretin-based therapies, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. This possibility has been somewhat mitigated by the null findings meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, but the usefulness of their findings was hampered by serious shortcomings of lack of power and representativeness. These shortcomings can typically be addressed by observational studies, but observational studies on the topic have yielded conflicting findings. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to qualitatively and quantitatively appraise the totality of evidence on the association between the use of incretin-based therapies and the risk of pancreatic cancer in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched. The study quality was appraised using the ROBINS-I tool and based on the presence of pharmacoepidemiology biases. A random-effects model was used to estimate the summary relative risks with corresponding CIs.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were included. The qualitative assessment revealed that all studies had inadequate follow-up (≤5 years), 12 studies were suspected to suffer from time-lag bias (due to inappropriate choice of comparator group) to varying extent, five studies included prevalent users, five studies did not implement exposure lag period, five studies had a serious risk of bias due to confounding, and one study had a time-window bias. The quantitative assessment showed no indication of an increased risk when all studies were pooled together (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.87, 1.24) and when the analysis was restricted to the studies with the least bias (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.51, 1.17). However, the pooled RRs were more frequently higher in the studies with less rigorous design and analysis. Specifically, a tendency toward an increased risk was observed in the studies with (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.04, 1.72) or possibly with (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.89, 1.36) time-lag bias, in the studies that did not apply (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.93, 1.63) or with potentially inadequate exposure lag period of 6 months (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.66, 1.94), in the studies that inappropriate comparator group of a combination of unspecified (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.25, 1.78) or non-insulin (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.93, 1.42) antidiabetic drugs, and in the studies with serious risk of bias due to confounding (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.56, 2.49).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the totality of evidence from observational studies does not support the claim that the use of incretin-based therapies is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in routine clinical practice. The increased risk of pancreatic cancer observed in observational studies reflects bias resulting from suboptimal methodological approaches, which need to be avoided by future studies.

Relationship between Changes in Blood Glucose and Blood Lipid Levels and the Risk of Thyroid Cancer in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective

To investigate the relationship between changes in blood glucose and blood lipid levels and the risk of thyroid cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

A total of 159 patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated in our hospital between June 2018 and February 2021 were recruited and assigned into the observation group, including 136 patients with type 2 diabetes without thyroid cancer (nonthyroid cancer group) and 23 patients with type 2 diabetes complicated with thyroid cancer (thyroid cancer group), and 120 healthy subjects during the same period were selected as the control group. Glycated hemoglobin (HbAlc), total cholesterol (TC), triacylglycerol (TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were detected and compared. Pearson's method was conducted to analyze the correlation between serum HbAlc level and TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus; multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the influencing factors of thyroid cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Results

The serum HbAlc level and the incidence of thyroid cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The levels of TC, TG, and LDL-C in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the level of HDL-C was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The correlation analysis showed that serum HbAlc levels in patients with type 2 diabetes were positively correlated with TC and TG levels and negatively correlated with HDL-C levels (P < 0.05) and not correlated with LDL-C levels (P > 0.05). Compared with the type 2 diabetes patients without thyroid cancer, the serum HbAlc, TC, and TG levels of the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the thyroid cancer group were significantly higher, and the levels of HDL-C were significantly lower (P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the level of LDL-C (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that serum HbAlc, TC, and TC levels were all risk factors for thyroid cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (P < 0.05), while serum HDL-C level was a protective factor for thyroid cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Thyroid cancer in type 2 diabetes patients may be linked to elevated levels of blood HbAlc, TC, and TG. HbAlc may raise the risk of thyroid cancer in type 2 diabetes patients by modulating blood lipid levels, which might serve as a marker to assess the risk of thyroid cancer in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. However, since this study did not conduct in vitro and in vivo experiments, how HbAlc affects the pathogenesis of thyroid cancer has not been described in this study, which is also our future research direction. It is expected to provide new ideas for the prevention and treatment of thyroid cancer.

Obesity, diabetes mellitus, and pancreatic carcinogenesis: Correlations, prevention, and diagnostic implications

The prevalence of obesity, diabetes mellitus (DM), and pancreatic cancer (PC) has been consistently increasing in the last two decades worldwide. Sharing various influential risk factors in genetics and environmental inducers in pathogenesis, the close correlations of these three diseases have been demonstrated in plenty of clinical studies using multiple parameters among different populations. On the contrary, most measures aimed to manage and treat obesity and DM effectively reduce the risk and prevent PC occurrence, yet certain drugs can inversely promote pancreatic carcinogenesis instead. Most importantly, an elevation of blood glucose with or without a reduction in body weight, along with other potential tools, may provide valuable clues for detecting PC at an early stage in patients with obesity and DM, favoring a timely intervention and prolonging survival. Herein, the epidemiological and etiological correlations among these three diseases and the supporting clinical evidence of their connections are first summarized to favor a better and more thorough understanding of obesity- and DM-related pancreatic carcinogenesis. After comparing the distinct impacts of different weight-lowering and anti-diabetic treatments on the risk of PC, the possible diagnostic implications of hyperglycemia and weight loss in PC screening are also addressed in detail.

Use of Antihyperglycemic Drugs and Risk of Cancer in Patients with Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for several types of cancer. Therefore, use of antihyperglycemic medications to lower blood glucose may modify cancer risk. Here we review available data on the link between the most common classes of antihyperglycemic agents and cancer risk among patients with diabetes.

RECENT FINDINGS

A database search was conducted between February 2022 and June 2022 on PubMed and Embase for systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating the association between antihyperglycemic agents and risk of cancer. Use of biguanides such as metformin is associated with 20-30% lower risk for all cancer incidence, and somewhat greater benefit for cancer-related mortality. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, e.g., acarbose, have not been consistently associated with cancer. Similarly, no consistent effects have been reported for thiazolidinediones, but the relationship with cancer seems to depend on the type of drug, dose, and duration of treatment. Exposure to various types of incretin-based therapies (glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors) has not been found to significantly modify cancer risk. Inhibitors of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 may raise risk for bladder cancer and reduce risk for gastrointestinal cancer. Use of insulin and insulin analogs is associated with a significant increase in total cancer risk by almost 50% compared to other antihyperglycemic drugs. Likewise, insulin secretagogues like sulfonylureas have generally been linked to greater risk for cancer by ~ 20%, although these associations may be agent-specific and dose-dependent. Current evidence suggests that the risk of cancer associated with the use of antihyperglycemic medications among patients with diabetes depends on the class of drug and type of agent, dosage, and duration of treatment. More research is needed to delineate the mechanisms by which these agents affect the process of carcinogenesis.

Multifocal C-cell Hyperplasia and Marked Hypercalcitoninemia in a Diabetic Patient Treated With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist With Concurrent Multinodular Goiter and Hyperparathyroidism

Thyroid C-cell hyperplasia (CCH) is divided into physiologic or reactive CCH and neoplastic CCH. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 Ra) is a group of medications used to treat type 2 diabetes that has documented C-cell stimulation effect in rodents, leading to subsequent CCH and medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) in rats and/or mice. Currently, there is no sufficient evidence supporting the association between GLP-1 Ra and human thyroid CCH and/or MTC. Here, we present a case of significant hypercalcitoninemia in a 53-year-old diabetic male patient receiving GLP-1 Ra treatment with concurrent multinodular goiter and hyperparathyroidism. Total thyroidectomy and central neck dissection revealed multifocal CCH involving bilateral thyroid lobes and several negative lymph nodes. Subsequent genetic testing did not detect germline mutation of RET gene. However, due to marked hypercalcitoninemia and massive thyromegaly, unsampled medullary thyroid microcarcinoma cannot be completely ruled out. The patient's postsurgical calcitonin level was back to normal. Our case indicates the significant clinical value of monitoring serum calcitonin levels in patients receiving GLP-1 Ra, especially in presence of other thyroid and/or parathyroid pathology that may be associated with increased calcitonin and/or CCH. Literature regarding the association between GLP-1 Ra and CCH is also reviewed.

GLP-1 receptor agonist as a modulator of innate immunity

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a 30-amino acid hormone secreted by L cells in the distal ileum, colon, and pancreatic α cells, which participates in blood sugar regulation by promoting insulin release, reducing glucagon levels, delaying gastric emptying, increasing satiety, and reducing appetite. GLP-1 specifically binds to the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) in the body, directly stimulating the secretion of insulin by pancreatic β-cells, promoting proliferation and differentiation, and inhibiting cell apoptosis, thereby exerting a glycemic lowering effect. The glycemic regulating effect of GLP-1 and its analogues has been well studied in human and murine models in the circumstance of many diseases. Recent studies found that GLP-1 is able to modulate innate immune response in a number of inflammatory diseases. In the present review, we summarize the research progression of GLP-1 and its analogues in immunomodulation and related signal pathways.

Diabetes and skin cancers: Risk factors, molecular mechanisms and impact on prognosis

Diabetes and skin cancers have emerged as threats to public health worldwide. However, their association has been less intensively studied. In this narrative review, we explore the common risk factors, molecular mechanisms, and prognosis of the association between cutaneous malignancies and diabetes. Hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, low-grade chronic inflammation, genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors partially explain the crosstalk between skin cancers and this metabolic disorder. In addition, diabetes and its related complications may interfere with the appropriate management of cutaneous malignancies. Antidiabetic medication seems to exert an antineoplastic effect, however, future large, observation studies with a prospective design are needed to clarify its impact on the risk of malignancy in diabetes. Screening for diabetes in skin cancers, as well as close follow-up for the development of cutaneous malignancies in subjects suffering from diabetes, is warranted.

GLP-1 receptor agonist-associated tumor adverse events: A real-world study from 2004 to 2021 based on FAERS

Background: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits, but the relationship between GLP-1RA and tumors is controversial. Recently, clinical trials reported higher rates of malignancy with semaglutide than control group. As real-world evidence of GLP-1RA-associated tumor risk is very limited, we explored the association of GLP-1RA and all types of neoplasms by mining the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: The FAERS data from the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 to the second quarter (Q2) of 2020 in the AERSMine were extracted to conduct disproportionality analysis, which was used by the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) to assess the relationship between GLP-1RA and all types of neoplasms. Then, the details of disproportionate GLP-1RA-associated tumor cases from Q1 2004 to Q2 2021 in the FAERS Public Dashboard were collected to analyze demographic characteristics. Results: A total of 8718 GLP-1RA-associated tumors were reported. Excluding cases with pre-existing tumors, other glucose-lowering drugs, and other GLP-1RA-related adverse events, diabetes cases with GLP-1RA as the main suspected drug were selected. GLP-1RA did not cause a disproportionate increase in all tumor cases (PRR 0.83) at the SOC level, and there was also no increase in most types of tumors associated with GLP-1RA at the HLGT/HLT levels. Significant signals were detected between GLP-1RA and certain tumors, including thyroid cancers [medullary thyroid cancer (PRR 27.43) and papillary thyroid cancer (PRR 8.68)], pancreatic neoplasms malignant (PRR 9.86), and islet cell neoplasms and APUDoma NEC (PRR 2.86). The combination of GLP-1RA with dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP4i) perhaps caused the increased reporting rate in some tumors. Conclusion: Our study provided new real-world evidence for oncology safety information of GLP-1RA. Given the wide use of GLP-1RA, clinicians should be well informed about important potential adverse events. Our pharmacovigilance analysis also prompted clinicians to raise concerns about potential tumor-related adverse effects when combining GLP-1RA with DPP4i.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers.

METHODS

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development.

RESULTS

This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.

Metformin: Is it a drug for all reasons and diseases?

Metformin was first used to treat type 2 diabetes in the late 1950s and in 2022 remains the first-choice drug used daily by approximately 150 million people. An accumulation of positive pre-clinical and clinical data has stimulated interest in re-purposing metformin to treat a variety of diseases including COVID-19. In polycystic ovary syndrome metformin improves insulin sensitivity. In type 1 diabetes metformin may help reduce the insulin dose. Meta-analysis and data from pre-clinical and clinical studies link metformin to a reduction in the incidence of cancer. Clinical trials, including MILES (Metformin In Longevity Study), and TAME (Targeting Aging with Metformin), have been designed to determine if metformin can offset aging and extend lifespan. Pre-clinical and clinical data suggest that metformin, via suppression of pro-inflammatory pathways, protection of mitochondria and vascular function, and direct actions on neuronal stem cells, may protect against neurodegenerative diseases. Metformin has also been studied for its anti-bacterial, -viral, -malaria efficacy. Collectively, these data raise the question: Is metformin a drug for all diseases? It remains unclear as to whether all of these putative beneficial effects are secondary to its actions as an anti-hyperglycemic and insulin-sensitizing drug, or result from other cellular actions, including inhibition of mTOR (mammalian target for rapamycin), or direct anti-viral actions. Clarification is also sought as to whether data from ex vivo studies based on the use of high concentrations of metformin can be translated into clinical benefits, or whether they reflect a 'Paracelsus' effect. The environmental impact of metformin, a drug with no known metabolites, is another emerging issue that has been linked to endocrine disruption in fish, and extensive use in T2D has also raised concerns over effects on human reproduction. The objectives for this review are to: 1) evaluate the putative mechanism(s) of action of metformin; 2) analyze the controversial evidence for metformin's effectiveness in the treatment of diseases other than type 2 diabetes; 3) assess the reproducibility of the data, and finally 4) reach an informed conclusion as to whether metformin is a drug for all diseases and reasons. We conclude that the primary clinical benefits of metformin result from its insulin-sensitizing and antihyperglycaemic effects that secondarily contribute to a reduced risk of a number of diseases and thereby enhancing healthspan. However, benefits like improving vascular endothelial function that are independent of effects on glucose homeostasis add to metformin's therapeutic actions.

Potential pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the inherent risk of cancer in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Emerging evidence demonstrates an intimate interplay between cardiovascular disease and cancer pathophysiology. The aim of this review is to shed light on the common biological pathways underlying cardiovascular disease and cancer. These common pathways form the basis of "reverse cardio-oncology". We focus on the role of inflammation, stress response, cell proliferation, angiogenesis and tissue remodeling, neurohormonal system activation, and genomic instability as pathogenic pathways shared by cardiovascular disease and cancer. We also discuss shared mediators that may have a potential role as biomarkers for risk prediction in both diseases. Furthermore, we highlight current knowledge on biological pathways and mediators that are upregulated in diabetes and myocardial infarction and may be involved in tumorigenesis. On the basis of the shared pathophysiologic mechanisms, we also suggest an integrated approach to reduce the global burden of both cardiovascular disease and cancer.

Physiological and pharmacological actions of glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in domestic animals

•

GLP-1 improves peripheral glucose uptake in healthy dogs and cats.

•

GLP-1 analogues administration in diabetic cats reduces exogenous insulin requirement.

•

Dogs cardiomyocytes apoptosis is reduced by GLP-1-derived molecules action.

Analogues of glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and other drugs that increase this peptide half-life are used worldwide in human medicine to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity. These molecules can increase insulin release and satiety, interesting effects that could also be useful in the treatment of domestic animals pathologies, however their use in veterinary medicine are still limited. Considering the increasing incidence of DM and obesity in cats and dogs, the aim of this review is to summarize the available information about the physiological and pharmacological actions of GLP-1 in domestic animals and discuss about its potential applications in veterinary medicine. In diabetic dogs, the use of drugs based on GLP-1 actions reduced blood glucose and increased glucose uptake, while in diabetic cats they reduced glycemic variability and exogenous insulin administration. Thus, available evidence indicates that GLP-1 based drugs could become alternatives to DM treatment in domestic animals. Nevertheless, current data do not provide enough elements to recommend these drugs widespread clinical use.

Differential Risk of Cancer Associated with Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: Analysis of Real-world Databases

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1Ra) are commonly used in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, differential risk of various cancers among GLP1Ra recipients is unknown.

METHODS

We inquired an aggregated electronic health record database, Explorys, and compared the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of cancers between GLP1Ra and metformin users. Findings were validated in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FDA FAERS).

RESULTS

From 1/2005 to 6/2019, we identified 619 340 and 64 230 patients in the metformin and GLP1Ra group, respectively. Within 5 years of starting antidiabetic medications, GLP1Ra was associated with significantly lower incident risk of prostate (aOR 0.81, p = .03), lung (aOR 0.81, p = .05), and colon cancer (aOR 0.85, p = .03), while the risk of thyroid cancer was significantly higher (aOR 1.65, p < .01). Similar findings were seen in the FDA FAERS database, where GLP1Ra was associated with lower risk of prostate (aOR 0.72, p = .08), lung (aOR 0.52, p < .01), colon cancer (aOR 0.82, p = .31), and higher risk of thyroid cancer (aOR 4.33, p < .01). In addition, with longer duration of GLP1Ra use, the risk of prostate, lung, and colon cancer further decreased, suggesting an exposure duration-response relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP1Ra is associated with lower risks of prostate, lung, and colon cancer, but higher risk of thyroid cancer.

The current significance and prospects for the use of dual receptor agonism GLP-1/Glucagon

The therapeutic arsenal for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been enriched recently with the inclusion of type 1 glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1). GLP-1 receptor agonists (RA) secondarily reduce appetite, decrease gastric emptying, and reduce body weight. This effect has been used to treat overweight/obesity, especially with comorbidities associated with T2DM. However, the first formulations and adverse effects gradually gave way to new formulations with fewer unpleasant effects and a more extended period of action (weekly subcutaneous administration and even oral administration), which improved the acceptance and adherence to the treatment. Therefore, titration of GLP-1RA should be done gradually. Furthermore, when side effects are consistent and intolerable after weeks/months of titration, a lower dose or a combination of antidiabetic therapies should be implemented, avoiding treatment interruption. The effort to produce increasingly powerful molecules with fewer side effects is the driving force behind the pharmaceutical industry. The unimolecular dual agonism GLP-1RA plus glucagon receptor agonism (GRA) represents an updated pharmacological indication for controlling blood glucose levels in treating T2DM and its comorbidities, showing better effects with less adverse impact than mono GLP-1RA. There are currently different proposals in this way by different laboratories. Nevertheless, the experimental results are promising and show that soon, we will have the contribution of new drugs for the treatment of T2DM.

Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cancer: pathophysiological and therapeutic associations

Overweight, obesity, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) have become epidemic conditions affecting 39%, 13%, and 20% of the population respectively. The aim of this article is to review the literature on the association of obesity and MetS with the risk of cancer. We also explore the effect of lifestyle modifications, such as diet, physical activity, and antidiabetic medications, on cancer incidence. Increased body mass index (BMI) has been associated with a multitude of site-specific cancers, reaching relative risk (RR) 1.54 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-1.61] per 5 unit increase for endometrial cancer, as well as with overall cancer risk (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05). Central adiposity measured by waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio has been suggested as a stronger predictor than BMI for several cancers, such as colorectal cancer. Metabolic Syndrome has been consistently and positively associated with the risk of very common cancers like colorectal (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.24-1.44), endometrial (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.26-2.07) and postmenopausal breast cancer (RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.55-2.60). Hyperglycemia and subsequently T2DM have been also shown to increase the risk of cancer. Nevertheless, these risk factors are modifiable and therefore implementing lifestyle modifications could prevent an important number of cancer cases. Adherence to cancer prevention guidelines, including maintaining a healthy weight, having regular physical exercise (RR 0.58-0.90 for different cite specific cancers) and following a healthy dietary pattern (RR 0.74-0.94 for different cite specific cancers) have a protective effect on the risk of cancer. The strength of this review is the presentation of the best evidence, as the data derive mainly from meta-analyses. Public health policies should focus on the modification of risk factors and future research is needed to reveal the pathophysiological links between these risk factors and cancer to develop more efficient prevention and treatment strategies.

Diabetes and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A New Look at Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Role of Novel Antidiabetic Agents

Epidemiological data have demonstrated a significant association between the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). Chronic hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, oxidative stress, and inflammation, the processes inherent to T2DM, also play active roles in the onset and progression of CRC. Recently, small dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, a typical characteristic of diabetic dyslipidemia, emerged as another possible underlying link between T2DM and CRC. Growing evidence suggests that antidiabetic medications may have beneficial effects in CRC prevention. According to findings from a limited number of preclinical and clinical studies, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) could be a promising strategy in reducing the incidence of CRC in patients with diabetes. However, available findings are inconclusive, and further studies are required. In this review, novel evidence on molecular mechanisms linking T2DM with CRC development, progression, and survival will be discussed. In addition, the potential role of GLP-1RAs therapies in CRC prevention will also be evaluated.

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes using novel antidiabetic medicines as add-on therapy: an observational real-world study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) as add-on therapy on cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

DESIGN AND SETTING

A nationwide cohort study using three linked healthcare databases from Slovenia (outpatient prescription claims data, hospitalisation claims data and death registry data).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with T2D with newly introduced DPP-4i (n=3817), GLP-1RA (n=855) or SGLT2i (n=2851) add-on therapy between June 2014 and June 2018.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was a major adverse CV event (MACE), while the secondary outcomes were CV death and heart failure (HF). The effects of the antidiabetic medicine group on the risk of each outcome were estimated with Cox proportional hazards regression. Intention-to-treat and on-treatment approaches were used.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, SGLT2i as add-on therapy, when compared with DPP-4i, was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR=0.66; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.85; p=0.002) and CV death (HR=0.46; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.73; p=0.001). On-treatment analysis revealed lower HF risk in patients initiating SGLT2i (HR=0.54; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.99; p=0.047). In the intention-to-treat analysis, GLP-1RA add-on therapy was associated with a lower MACE risk when compared with DPP-4i (HR=0.64; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.97; p=0.034), but it had a non-significant effect on CV death (HR=0.62; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.14; p=0.128) and HF (HR=1.39; 95% CI 0.88 to 2.21; p=0.157). The results of on-treatment analyses were in agreement with the results of intention-to-treat analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2i and GLP-1RA improved CV morbidity and mortality in patients with T2D when compared with DPP-4i as an add-on therapy. The results of this study may serve as a basis for the selection of an optimal add-on antidiabetic medicine to reduce CV morbidity and mortality in patients with T2D in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EUPAS32558.

A Practical Review of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Treatment in Primary Care

The treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) is becoming more complex as new medications are approved. Primary care providers must maintain their medical knowledge on emerging medications for best patient care. This review simplifies the non-insulin treatments of diabetes with an emphasis on the cardio-renal protectants, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1).

Role of metformin and other metabolic drugs in the prevention and therapy of endocrine-related cancers

Metabolic syndrome is associated with chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer. This review summarizes the current evidence on the antitumor effects of some relevant drugs currently used to manage metabolic-related pathologies (i.e. insulin and its analogs, metformin, statins, etc.) in endocrine-related cancers including breast cancer, prostate cancer, pituitary cancer, ovarian cancer, and neuroendocrine neoplasms. Although current evidence does not provide a clear antitumor role of several of these drugs, metformin seems to be a promising chemopreventive and adjuvant agent in cancer management, modulating tumor cell metabolism and microenvironment, through both AMP-activated protein kinase-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Moreover, its combination with statins might represent a promising therapeutic strategy to tackle the progression of endocrine-related tumors. However, further studies are needed to endorse the clinical relevance of these drugs as adjuvants for cancer chemotherapy.

The Influence of Anti-Diabetic Drugs on Prostate Cancer

The incidences of prostate cancer (PC) and diabetes are increasing, with a sustained trend. The occurrence of PC and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is growing with aging. The correlation between PC occurrence and diabetes is noteworthy, as T2DM is correlated with a reduced risk of incidence of prostate cancer. Despite this reduction, diabetes mellitus increases the mortality in many cancer types, including prostate cancer. The treatment of T2DM is based on lifestyle changes and pharmacological management. Current available drugs, except insulin, are aimed at increasing insulin secretion (sulfonylureas, incretin drugs), improving insulin sensitivity (biguanides, thiazolidinediones), or increasing urinary glucose excretion (gliflozin). Comorbidities should be taken into consideration during the treatment of T2DM. This review describes currently known information about the mechanism and impact of commonly used antidiabetic drugs on the incidence and progression of PC. Outcomes of pre-clinical studies are briefly presented and their correlations with available clinical trials have also been observed. Available reports and meta-analyses demonstrate that most anti-diabetic drugs do not increase the risk during the treatment of patients with PC. However, some reports show a potential advantage of treatment of T2DM with specific drugs. Based on clinical reports, use of metformin should be considered as a therapeutic option. Moreover, anticancer properties of metformin were augmented while combined with GLP-1 analogs.

The Diabetes Syndrome - A Collection of Conditions with Common, Interrelated Pathophysiologic Mechanisms

The four basic pathophysiologic mechanisms which damage the β-cell within diabetes (ie, genetic and epigenetic changes, inflammation, an abnormal environment, and insulin resistance [IR]) also contribute to cell and tissue damage and elevate the risk of developing all typical diabetes-related complications. Genetic susceptibility to damage from abnormal external and internal environmental factors has been described including inflammation and IR. All these mechanisms can promote epigenetic changes, and in total, these pathophysiologic mechanisms interact and react with each other to cause damage to cells and tissues ultimately leading to disease. Importantly, these pathophysiologic mechanisms also serve to link other common conditions including cancer, dementia, psoriasis, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The “Diabetes Syndrome”, an overarching group of interrelated conditions linked by these overlapping mechanisms, can be viewed as a conceptual framework that can facilitate understanding of the inter-relationships of superficially disparate conditions. Recognizing the association of the conditions within the Diabetes Syndrome due to common pathophysiologies has the potential to provide both benefit to the patient (eg, prevention, early detection, precision medicine) and to the advancement of medicine (eg, driving education, research, and dynamic decision-based medical practice).

Increased co-expression of PSMA2 and GLP-1 receptor in cervical cancer models in type 2 diabetes attenuated by Exendin-4: A translational case-control study

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) increases the risk of many types of cancer. Dysregulation of proteasome-related protein degradation leads to tumorigenesis, while Exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist, possesses anti-cancer effects.

METHODS

We explored the co-expression of proteasome alpha 2 subunit (PSMA2) and GLP-1R in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and human cervical cancer specimens, supplemented by in vivo and in vitro studies using multiple cervical cancer cell lines.

FINDINGS

PSMA2 expression was increased in 12 cancer types in TCGA database and cervical cancer specimens from patients with T2D (T2D vs non-T2D: 3.22 (95% confidence interval CI: 1.38, 5.05) vs 1.00 (0.66, 1.34) fold change, P = 0.01). psma2-shRNA decreased cell proliferation in vitro, and tumour volume and Ki67 expression in vivo. Exendin-4 decreased psma2 expression, tumour volume and Ki67 expression in vivo. There was no change in GLP-1R expression in 12 cancer types in TCGA database. However, GLP-1R expression (T2D vs non-T2D: 5.49 (3.0, 8.1) vs 1.00 (0.5, 1.5) fold change, P < 0.001) was increased and positively correlated with PSMA2 expression in T2D-related (r = 0.68)  but not in non-T2D-related cervical cancer specimens. This correlation was corroborated by in vitro experiments where silencing glp-1r decreased psma2 expression. Exendin-4 attenuated phospho-p65 and -IκB expression in the NF-κB pathway.

INTERPRETATION

PSMA2 and GLP-1R expression in T2D-related cervical cancer specimens was increased and positively correlated, suggesting hyperglycaemia might promote cancer growth by increasing PSMA2 expression which could be attenuated by Exendin-4.

FUNDING

This project was supported by Postdoctoral Fellowship Scheme, Direct Grant, Diabetes Research and Education Fund from the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK).

Diabetes, Antidiabetic Medications and Cancer Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: Focus on SGLT-2 Inhibitors

In the last decade, cancer became the leading cause of death in the population under 65 in the European Union. Diabetes is also considered as a factor increasing risk of cancer incidence and mortality. Type 2 diabetes is frequently associated with being overweight and obese, which also plays a role in malignancy. Among biological mechanisms linking diabetes and obesity with cancer hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, increased levels of growth factors, steroid and peptide hormones, oxidative stress and increased activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines are listed. Antidiabetic medications can modulate cancer risk through directly impacting metabolism of cancer cells as well as indirectly through impact on risk factors of malignancy. Some of them are considered beneficial (metformin and thiazolidinedions—with the exception of bladder cancer); on the other hand, excess of exogenous insulin may be potentially harmful, while other medications seem to have neutral impact on cancer risk. Inhibitors of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) are increasingly used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. However, their association with cancer risk is unclear. The aim of this review was to analyze the anticancer potential of this class of drugs, as well as risks of site-specific malignancies associated with their use.

Integrating oral semaglutide into clinical practice in primary care: for whom, when, and how?

Oral semaglutide is the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved oral glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Prior articles within this supplement reviewed the PIONEER trial program, which demonstrated that oral semaglutide reduced glycated hemoglobin and body weight when given to patients with uncontrolled T2D on various background therapies, and had a safety profile consistent with subcutaneous GLP-1RAs. This article provides guidance on integrating oral semaglutide into clinical practice in primary care. Patient populations with T2D who may gain benefit from oral semaglutide include those with inadequate glycemic control taking one or more oral glucose-lowering medication (e.g. after metformin), patients for whom weight loss would be beneficial, patients at risk of hypoglycemia, those who would historically have been considered for treatment with a subcutaneous GLP-1RA, and those receiving basal insulin who require treatment intensification. Like other GLP-1RAs, oral semaglutide is contraindicated in those with personal/family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma, and in those with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, as noted in a boxed warning in the prescribing information. Oral semaglutide has not been studied in those with a history of pancreatitis, is not recommended in patients with suspected/confirmed pancreatitis, and is not indicated in type 1 diabetes. When initiating oral semaglutide, gradual dose escalation is recommended to minimize the risk of gastrointestinal adverse events. As food and excess liquid reduce oral semaglutide absorption, patients should swallow the tablet with up to 4 fl oz/120 mL of water on an empty stomach upon waking, and should wait at least 30 minutes before eating, drinking, or taking other oral medications. Those managing patients should be aware of the potential impact of these dosing conditions on concomitant medications. When counseling patients, it is important to discuss these administration instructions, realistic therapeutic expectations, and strategies for mitigation of gastrointestinal events. Oral semaglutide provides a new option for add-on to initial T2D therapy (or later in the treatment paradigm), with the potential to enable more patients to benefit from the improvements in glycemic control, reductions in body weight, and low risk of hypoglycemia afforded by GLP-1RAs.

GLP-1 receptor agonists and pancreatic safety concerns in type 2 diabetic patients: data from cardiovascular outcome trials

PURPOSE

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. The aim of this meta-analysis was to collect data from large-scale cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) to assess the effect of GLP-1RAs on the incidence of acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Database of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were extensively searched up to October 10, 2019. Randomized controlled trials were eligible if they compared GLP-RA with placebo as add-on therapy to standard care in T2DM patients, and reported outcomes required for cardiovascular safety studies and events of acute pancreatitis and/or pancreatic cancer. Peto odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

Seven CVOTs enrolling 56,004 patients with T2DM were identified, with a median follow-up time ranging from 1.3 to 5.4 years. A total of 180 cases of acute pancreatitis and 108 cases of pancreatic cancer were reported. The risk of either acute pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer with GLP-1-RA treatment was not significantly different from that observed in placebo arm (Peto OR [95% CI] 1.05 [0.78-1.40], P = 0.76, and 1.12 [0.77-1.63], P = 0.56, respectively), and the results remained robust to sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Pooled analysis of CVOTs did not suggest any increased risk of either acute pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer with GLP-1RA treatment in T2DM patients.

Invited review. Series: Implications of the recent CVOTs in type 2 diabetes: Which patients for GLP-1RA or SGLT-2 inhibitor?

Large cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) have lent support to a cardiovascular protection with the use of SGLT2-inhibitors (SGLT2is) and GLP1-Receptor Agonists (GLP1-RAs) in subjects with type 2 diabetes. These two classes of novel glucose lowering agents have been shown to have a similar effect on the risk reduction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE: nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular mortality). Nonetheless, they may not be simply interchangeable. Rather, careful evaluation of all the results of CVOTs leads identification of different effects that may allow profiling of the ideal individuals with T2DM who may benefit most from the use of one or the other class of agents. These differences include effect on heart failure, stroke and diabetic kidney disease that have prompt recent guidelines and recommendation for the treatment of type 2 diabetes to suggest the preferential use of SGLT2is in those with evidence of heart failure and impaired kidney function, while both SGLT2i and GLP1-RAs with proven effect could be use in those with prevalent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This review discusses all these elements of differentiation along with others that in the future may help establishing the best cardiorenal benefit for individuals with T2DM.