On the Endless Dilemma of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Breast: a Journey Through Concepts and Entities

Primary neuroendocrine tumor of the breast: A case report

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasm of the breast (PNENB) is a rare subtype of breast cancer, accounting for <1% of all breast tumors. The morphological features of PNENB are similar to those of neuroendocrine tumors originating in the lungs or gastrointestinal system, with tumor cells exhibiting the strong expression of neuroendocrine markers, including chromogranin A and synaptophysin. Since this type of cancer was first reported, the definition, classification and diagnostic criteria of PNENB have evolved and changed. However, accurate diagnostic criteria and standard treatment guidelines are lacking. The present report describes a specific case of PNENB, which was consistent with the morphological and molecular features of other cases in most previous studies. In addition, the current body of literature on PNENB, including its development, diagnosis, molecular features, treatment and prognosis is reviewed.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Breast: Current Insights and Future Directions

BACKGROUND

The breast neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors and account for less than 1% of all NENs. The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Breast Tumors in 2019 introduced a more stringent definition for breast NENs including neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) (G1, G2) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (small cell carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma). While the diagnostic criteria and treatment of breast NENs still have some unsolved issues.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to discuss the diagnosis, treatment progress, existing problems, and future development direction of breast NENs.

METHODS

We provide a comprehensive review and evaluation of the diagnostic criteria, pathological features, utilization of immunohistochemical markers, molecular characteristics, pathogenesis, clinical significance, treatment options for breast NENs.

RESULTS

(1) Under the new definition, "pure" breast NENs are extremely rare. (2) Breast NETs are graded according to Nottingham grading System. Grading criteria utilized in other systems for NENs, such as mitotic count, ki67 proliferation index, and necrosis, have not been applied to breast NENs. (3) The WHO has not yet acknowledged the existence of NET G3 clearly. (4) The expression of NE markers may differ in breast NECs. (5) The treatment of breast NENs is still based on IBCs-NST, and without any difference from invasive carcinoma with NE features. (6) The prognosis of breast NENs remains unclear, while the prognosis for NECs is significantly poorer than invasive breast carcinomas of no special type (IBCs-NST) has been confirmed.

CONCLUSION

Strict adherence to criteria is the key to correctly diagnose breast NENs with the exclusion of metastasis from other sites. Further exploration is required to determine the tissue origin of breast NENs and understand the pathogenesis. Efforts are still needed to establish unified diagnostic criteria and a unique diagnosis and treatment consensus for breast NENs.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a review of literature

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast are characterized by neuroendocrine architectural and cytological features, which must be supported by immunohistochemical positivity for neuroendocrine markers (such as Chromogranin and Synaptophysin). According to the literature, making a diagnosis of primary neuroendocrine breast cancer always needs to rule out a possible primary neuroendocrine neoplasm from another site. Currently, the latest 2022 version of the WHO of endocrine and neuroendocrine neoplasms has classified breast NENs as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and aggressive neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), differentiating them from invasive breast cancers of no special type (IBCs-NST). with neuroendocrine features. The current review article describes six cases from our series and a comprehensive review of the literature in the field of NENs of the breast.

Molecular Classification of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Are We Ready for That?

In the last two decades, the increasing availability of technologies for molecular analyses has allowed an insight in the genomic alterations of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. This knowledge has confirmed, supported, and informed the pathological classification of NEN, clarifying the differences between neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and helping to define the G3 NET category. At the same time, the identification genomic alterations, in terms of gene mutation, structural abnormalities, and epigenetic changes differentially involved in the pathogenesis of NEC and NET has identified potential molecular targets for precision therapy. This review critically recapitulates the available molecular features of digestive NEC and NET, highlighting their correlates with pathological aspects and clinical characteristics of these neoplasms and revising their role as predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy. In this context, the feasibility and applicability of a molecular classification of gastrointestinal and pancreatic NEN will be explored.

Expression of novel neuroendocrine markers in breast carcinomas: a study of INSM1, ASCL1, and POU2F3

INSM1, ASCL1, and POU2F3 are novel transcription factors involved in neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation of neoplasms in several organs, but data on their expression in breast carcinomas (BCs) are limited. We retrospectively evaluated the expression of these markers in a series of 97 BCs (58 with NE morphology and 39 with otherwise uncommon morphology) tested prospectively using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Nuclear staining in >50% of the cells was used as the positive cut-off. Thirty-two of the 97 BCs (33%) were INSM1-positive. INSM1-positivity correlated significantly with histologic type and presence of stromal mucin. INSM1 also correlated with synaptophysin and chromogranin, established markers of NE differentiation (P < .0001 and P = .0023, respectively). In BC with NE morphology, the expression of INSM1 supported NE differentiation, and INSM1 was more specific than synaptophysin and more sensitive and specific than chromogranin. INSM1 was the most expressed NE marker in 17 BCs. INSM1-positive BCs included 56% of solid papillary BCs, 88% of BCs with solid papillary features, and 75% of high-grade NE carcinomas. Of 35 BCs tested for POU2F3 and ASCL1, only 1 and 4 cases were positive, respectively. Our results show that INSM1 is a sensitive marker of NE differentiation in BC and should be included with synaptophysin and chromogranin in the IHC panel used to evaluate NE differentiation in BC with NE morphology. ASCL1 and POU2F3 are uncommon in BC and their routine assessment is not warranted.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Breast: The Latest WHO Classification and Review of the Literature

Simple Summary

Breast tumors exhibiting neuroendocrine differentiation are a heterogeneous group of tumors that have been variously defined in previous World Health Organization (WHO) classifications. In the WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th edition, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the breast, both of which are invasive cancers, are classified as neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast. However, the clinical significance of NE differentiation in breast cancers, especially in NETs of the breast, is not yet fully understood, and a large overlap appears to exist between breast cancers showing NE differentiation and invasive breast cancer of no special type (IBC-NST). While breast NECs show distinct clinical and morphological features, diagnosis of NETs based on the morphological characteristics alone can be challenging; one reason is that breast NETs do not necessarily have the same morphological characteristics as those of NENs arising in other organs. Thus, the heterogeneity of breast tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation and the changes in their classifications over the years have left many open issues that still need to be resolved. In this review, we shall summarize the history of breast “NENs,” including of mixed types of tumors and the characteristics of these tumors, and discuss their differences from NENs arising in other organs.

Abstract

Breast tumors with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation comprise an uncommon and heterogeneous group of tumors, including invasive breast cancer of no special type (IBC-NST) with NE features, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification in 2019 defined neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast (Br-NENs) as tumors in which >90% of cells show histological evidence of NE differentiation, including NETs (low-grade tumors) and NEC (high-grade). Due to the low prevalence of these tumors and successive changes in their diagnostic criteria over the years, only limited evidence of these tumors exists, derived mainly from case reports and retrospective case series. Breast tumors with NE differentiation are usually treated like the more commonly occurring IBC-NSTs. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of breast tumors with NE differentiation usually shows a hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor type 2 (HER2)-negative profile, so that hormonal therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors or other targeted agents would be reasonable treatment options. Herein, we present a review of the literature on breast tumors with NE differentiation as defined in the latest WHO 2019 classification, and discuss the clinical management of these tumors.

Primary Small Cell Malignancies of the Breast: Are They Rare Malignancies?

In contrast with the other organs such as the lung, small cell tumors have been less studied in the breast due to their relatively less frequency. Although rare, neuroendocrine neoplasms, some lymphomas, and some small cell sarcomas such as undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma can be seen in small cell morphology in the breast. Many cytological specimens such as fine-needle aspiration biopsies and touch imprint cytology are used for diagnosis and further prognostic/predictive marker determination in primary breast masses, sentinel and axillary lymph nodes, and metastatic masses. Lobular carcinoma deserves to be considered in the small cell tumor group because of its small, monomorphic, discohesive, scant cytoplasmic cytological features. Since so many different types of tumors in the breast can have small cell characteristics, they should be divided into small cell neuroendocrine tumors and small cell nonneuroendocrine tumors. When evaluating small cell breast tumors cytologically, wide tumor diversity should be kept in mind, and clinical, hematological, and radiological features should be taken into consideration.

INSM1 Expression in Breast Neoplasms with Neuroedocrine Features

According to the 2019 WHO classification of breast tumors, neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are classified into well-differentiated NE tumors (NET) and poorly differentiated NE carcinomas (NEC), while other breast cancers (BCs) of special and no special type with neuroendocrine (NE) features are not incorporated in this scheme anymore. We aimed to assess whether INSM1, a novel NE marker, could have a role in breast NEN subtyping. We selected 63 BCs operated from 2003 to 2018, classified as BCs with NE features, with available clinico-pathological data. Following 2019 WHO criteria, this cohort was reclassified into 37 NETs/NECs, the remaining 26 tumors representing solid-papillary (7), mucinous (7), and mixed type (12) carcinomas with NE differentiation. Chromogranin A (CGA) and synaptophysin (SYN) immunostains were reviewed, and INSM1 was tested by immunohistochemistry. Thirty CGA- and SYN-negative no special type BCs served as negative control. INSM1 was expressed in 52/63 cases of the whole cohort (82.54%). INSM1 positive and negative cases had no significantly different clinico-pathological characteristics. INSM1 expression was not significantly different between the newly reclassified NET/NEC group and other BCs with NE features. No immunoexpression was observed in control BCs. The sensitivity and specificity of INSM1 for the NE phenotype was 82.5% and 100%, respectively, compared to 61.9% and 100% for CGA, and 95.2 and 100% for SYN. In conclusion, INSM1 is as accurate as traditional NE biomarkers to identify NE differentiation in BC. In analogy to standard NE markers, INSM1 could not distinguish NET and NEC from the other BC histotypes with NE differentiation.

The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast and its clinical relevance

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast (Br-NENs) are rare tumors of the mammary gland. Their definition and classification have been a matter of discussion for more than half a century, as they present some degree of overlap with other malignancies in the mammary gland. The recent evolutions in the understanding of the pathogenesis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) as well as the novel tools in the diagnostic arsenal of the pathologists, and a better correlation with clinical data, have led to improved classification schemes for these entities, beginning from those arising in digestive and thoracic organs. These new classification concepts have been recently expanded to NENs arising in every anatomical site, with the proposal of a common classification framework that has been applied in the 5th edition of the WHO classification of tumors. These concepts include the recognition of two distinct families of NENs (neuroendocrine tumors, NETs, and neuroendocrine carcinomas, NECs), the identification of mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, and the application of definite morphological and immunohistochemical criteria for the diagnosis of NENs. The last WHO classification of Br-NENs, however, still seems to leave several unanswered questions and unmet needs in the understanding of diagnostic and clinical features of these entities. This review will critically revise the current classification of Br-NENs, underlining its lights and shadows and focusing on the identification of diagnostic histopathological criteria that can help the univocal recognition of Br-NET, Br-NEC, and Br-MiNEN.

Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms: lights and shadows

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplastic proliferations showing different morphological features, immunophenotype, molecular background, clinical presentation, and outcome. They can virtually originate in every organ of the human body and their classification is not uniform among different sites. Indeed, as they have historically been classified according to the organ in which they primarily arise, the different nomenclature that has resulted have created some confusion among pathologists and clinicians. Although a uniform terminology to classify neuroendocrine neoplasms arising in different systems has recently been proposed by WHO/IARC, some issues remain unsolved or need to be clarified. In this review, we discuss the lights and shadows of the current WHO classifications used to define and characterize NENs of the pituitary gland, lung, breast and those of the head and neck region, and digestive and urogenital systems.

Genomics of High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor with High-Grade Features (G3 NET) and Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (NEC) of Various Anatomic Sites

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NENs) are clinically aggressive diseases, the classification of which has recently been redefined. They now include both poorly differentiated NENs (neuroendocrine carcinoma, NECs) and high proliferating well-differentiated NENs (called grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors, G3 NETs, in the digestive system). In the last decade, the "molecular revolution" that has affected all fields of medical oncology has also shed light in the understanding of HG NENs heterogeneity and has provided new diagnostic and therapeutic tools, useful in the management of these malignancies. Considering the kaleidoscopic aspects of HG NENs in various anatomical sites, this review systematically addresses the genomic landscape of such neoplasm throughout the more common thoracic and digestive locations, as well as it will consider other rare but not exceptional primary sites, including the skin, the head and neck, and the urogenital system. The revision of the available literature will then be oriented to understand the translational relevance of molecular data, by analyzing conceptual issues, clinicopathological correlations, and unmet needs in this field.

Primary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Breast: Still Open Issues

Neuroendocrine breast tumors represent a rare subtype of breast cancer, accounting for less than 1% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. Starting from their pathology definition, and going through their prevalence, prognosis and treatment, our knowledge is still really uncertain. In the present short review of the medical literature on this topic, we have evaluated in details their epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, pathology, clinical presentation, radiographic aspects, prognosis, and therapy. We have thus been able to identify a number of open issues regarding primary neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast that need to be clarified. Our ultimate aim was actually to try to understand whether neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast can be considered a definite clinical entity and if neuroendocrine differentiation of breast tumors has a really clinical relevance.

Nuclear Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 Expression as a Marker of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Neoplasms of the Breast

Insulinoma-associated protein-1 (INSM1), a transcription factor encoded by the insulinoma associated-1 gene, is a second-generation biomarker of neuroendocrine differentiation. Its sensitivity and specificity in comparison with chromogranin-A and synaptophysin have been extensively validated in several organs, but evidence regarding its expression in mammary neoplasms is limited. In this study, INSM1 immunohistochemistry was validated in a cohort of 22 mammary neoplasms, enriched with special type breast carcinomas with known neuroendocrine differentiation as determined by immunohistochemistry for synaptophysin and chromogranin-A. Subsequently, INSM1 expression was evaluated in a consecutive series of 66 invasive breast cancer biopsies. In the validation cohort, 14 tumors were synaptophysin-positive, of which all but one showed INSM1 immunoreactivity. Eight tumors were synaptophysin-negative, of which 3 showed focal nuclear INSM1 expression. Six tumors were chromogranin-A-positive, of which one was INSM1-negative. When compared with synaptophysin, INSM1 seems more sensitive but less specific than chromogranin-A. In the biopsy cohort, only one invasive carcinoma of no special type showed substantial INSM1 immunoreactivity (ie, 25% of the tumor cells). Three more cases showed 1% nuclear INSM1 staining. We conclude that neuroendocrine differentiation in invasive breast carcinoma of no special type is a rare finding. Immunohistochemical biomarkers, comprising INSM1 as well as the first-generation biomarkers chromogranin-A and synaptophysin, are useful to distinguish neuroendocrine differentiation in breast neoplasms. The identification of neuroendocrine differentiation can be helpful to establish the diagnosis of special type breast carcinomas such as solid papillary carcinoma.