Two Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors (PitNETs) with Very High Proliferation and TP53 Mutation - High-Grade PitNET or PitNEC?

The 2022 WHO classification of tumors of the pituitary gland: An update on aggressive and metastatic pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

The vast majority of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are benign and slow growing with a low relapse rate over many years after surgical resection. However, about 40% are locally invasive and may not be surgically cured, and about one percentage demonstrate an aggressive clinical behavior. Exceptionally, these aggressive tumors may metastasize outside the sellar region to the central nervous system and/or systemically. The 2017 (4th Edition) WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors abandoned the terminology "atypical adenoma" for tumors previously considered to have potential for a more aggressive behavior since its prognostic value was not established. The 2022 (5th Edition) WHO Classification of the Pituitary Tumors emphasizes the concept that morphological features distinguish indolent tumors from locally aggressive ones, however, the proposed histological subtypes are not consistent with the real life clinical characteristics of patients with aggressive tumors/carcinomas. So far, no single clinical, radiological or histological parameter can determine the risk of growth or malignant progression. Novel promising molecular prognostic markers, such as mutations in ATRX, TP53, SF3B1, and epigenetic DNA modifications, will need to be verified in larger tumor cohorts. In this review, we provide a critical analysis of the WHO guidelines for prognostic stratification and diagnosis of aggressive and metastatic PitNETs. In addition, we discuss the new WHO recommendations for changing ICD-O and ICD-11 codes for PitNET tumor behavior from a neoplasm either "benign" or "unspecified, borderline, or uncertain behavior" to "malignant" neoplasm regardless of the clinical presentation, histopathological subtype, and tumor location. We encourage multidisciplinary initiatives for integrated clinical, histological and molecular classification, which would enable early recognition of these challenging tumors and initiation of more appropriate and aggressive treatments, ultimately improving the outcome.

Grading and staging for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

Pituitary adenoma/pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are the second most common primary intracranial tumor and the most frequent neuroendocrine tumors/neoplasms of the human body. Thus, they are one of the most frequent diagnoses in neuropathologist's practise. 2022 5th edition WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors does not support a grading and/or staging system for PitNETs and argues that histological typing and subtyping are more robust than proliferation rate and invasiveness to stratify tumors. Numerous studies suggest the existence of clinically relevant molecular subgroups encouraging an integrated histo-molecular approach to the diagnosis of PitNETs to deepen the understanding of their biology and overcome the unresolved problem of grading system. The present review illustrates the main issues involved in establishing a grading and a staging system, as well as alternative systems validated by independent series to date. The state of art of the current histological and molecular markers is detailed, demonstrating that a standardized and reproducible clinico-pathological approach, combined with the integration of molecular data may help build a workflow to refine the definition of PitNETs with 'malignant potential' and most importantly, avoid delay in patient treatment. Next molecular studied are needed to validate an integrated histo-molecular grading for PitNETs.

High-Grade Progression, Sarcomatous Transformation, and/or Metastasis of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (PitNENs): The UCSF Experience

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET) that metastasize comprise ~ 0.2% of adenohypophyseal tumors are aggressive and are challenging to treat. However, many non-metastatic tumors are also aggressive. Herein, we review 21 specimens from 13 patients at UCSF with metastatic PitNETs (CSF or systemic, N = 7 patients), high-grade pituitary neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-PitNEN, N = 4 patients), and/or PitNETs with sarcomatous transformation (PitNET-ST, N = 5 patients). We subtyped cases using the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) criteria for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Lineage subtypes included acidophil stem cell, null cell, thyrotroph, corticotroph, lactotroph, and gonadotroph tumors. The median Ki-67 labeling index was 25% (range 5-70%). Lack of p16 was seen in 3 cases, with overexpression in 2. Strong diffuse p53 immunopositivity was present in 3 specimens from 2 patients. Loss of Rb expression was seen in 2 cases, with ATRX loss in one. Molecular analysis in 4 tumors variably revealed TERT alterations, homozygous CDKN2A deletion, aneuploidy, and mutations in PTEN, TP53, PDGFRB, and/or PIK3CA. Eight patients (62%) died of disease, 4 were alive at the last follow-up, and 1 was lost to the follow-up. All primary tumors had worrisome features, including aggressive lineage subtype, high mitotic count, and/or high Ki-67 indices. Additional evidence of high-grade progression included immunohistochemical loss of neuroendocrine, transcription factor, and/or hormone markers. We conclude that metastatic PitNET is not the only high-grade form of pituitary NEN. If further confirmed, these histopathologic and/or molecular features could provide advanced warning of biological aggressiveness and be applied towards a future grading scheme.

An Update on the Genetic Drivers of Corticotroph Tumorigenesis

The genetic landscape of corticotroph tumours of the pituitary gland has dramatically changed over the last 10 years. Somatic changes in the USP8 gene account for the most common genetic defect in corticotrophinomas, especially in females, while variants in TP53 or ATRX are associated with a subset of aggressive tumours. Germline defects have also been identified in patients with Cushing's disease: some are well-established (MEN1, CDKN1B, DICER1), while others are rare and could represent coincidences. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge on the genetic drivers of corticotroph tumorigenesis, their molecular consequences, and their impact on the clinical presentation and prognosis.

Relevance of mutations in protein deubiquitinases genes and TP53 in corticotroph pituitary tumors

Introduction

Corticotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) develop from ACTH-producing cells. They commonly cause Cushing's disease (CD), however, some remain clinically silent. Recurrent USP8, USP48, BRAF and TP53 mutations occur in corticotroph PitNETs. The aim of our study was to determine frequency and relevance of these mutations in a possibly large series of corticotroph PitNETs.

Methods

Study included 147 patients (100 CD and 47 silent tumors) that were screened for hot-spot mutations in USP8, USP48 and BRAF with Sanger sequencing, while 128 of these patients were screened for TP53 mutations with next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry.

Results

USP8 mutations were found in 41% CD and 8,5% silent tumors, while USP48 mutations were found in 6% CD patients only. Both were more prevalent in women. They were related to higher rate of biochemical remission, non-invasive tumor growth, its smaller size and densely granulated histology, suggesting that these mutation may be favorable clinical features. Multivariate survival analyses did not confirm possible prognostic value of mutation in protein deubiquitinases. No BRAF mutations were found. Four TP53 mutations were identified (2 in CD, 2 in silent tumors) in tumors with size >10mm including 3 invasive ones. They were found in Crooke's cell and sparsely granulated tumors. Tumors with missense TP53 mutations had higher TP53 immunoreactivity score than wild-type tumors. Tumor with frameshift TP53 variant had low protein expression. TP53 mutation was a poor prognostic factor in CD according to uni- and multivariate survival analyses in spite of low mutations frequency.

Conclusions

We confirmed high prevalence of USP8 mutations and low incidence of USP48 and TP53 mutations. Changes in protein deubiquitinases genes appear to be favorable prognostic factors in CD. TP53 mutations are rare, occur in both functioning and silent tumors and are related to poor clinical outcome in CD.

Aggressive Pituitary Tumors and Pituitary Carcinomas: From Pathology to Treatment

Aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs) and pituitary carcinomas (PCs) are heterogeneous with regard to clinical presentation, proliferative markers, clinical course, and response to therapy. Half of them show an aggressive course only many years after the first apparently benign presentation. APTs and PCs share several properties, but a Ki67 index greater than or equal to 10% and extensive p53 expression are more prevalent in PCs. Mutations in TP53 and ATRX are the most common genetic alterations; their detection might be of value for early identification of aggressiveness. Treatment requires a multimodal approach including surgery, radiotherapy, and drugs. Temozolomide is the recommended first-line chemotherapy, with response rates of about 40%. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as second-line treatment in PCs, with currently no evidence for a superior effect of dual therapy compared to monotherapy with PD-1 blockers. Bevacizumab has resulted in partial response (PR) in few patients; tyrosine kinase inhibitors and everolimus have generally not been useful. The effect of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is limited as well. Management of APT/PC is challenging and should be discussed within an expert team with consideration of clinical and pathological findings, age, and general condition of the patient. Considering that APT/PCs are rare, new therapies should preferably be evaluated in shared standardized protocols. Prognostic and predictive markers to guide treatment decisions are needed and are the scope of ongoing research.

Aggressive pituitary tumors (PitNETs)

The majority of anterior pituitary tumors behave benignly, that is, they grow slowly and do not metastasize, and were therefore called adenomas. However, they would frequently invade adjacent structures, leading to recurrence. One of the misleading assumptions in their previous classification was the simplistic distinction made between adenoma and carcinoma. In the upcoming WHO 2022 classification, a new terminology will be introduced: pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) which is consistent with that used for other neuroendocrine neoplasms. In general, aggressive PitNETs are invasive and proliferative tumors with frequent recurrences, resistant to conventional treatments, and yet virtually without metastases. At present, no single morphological or histological marker has been shown as yet to reliably predict their aggressive behavior. In terms of treatment, temozolomide (TMZ) had been considered promising and the sole therapeutic option for aggressive and malignant PitNETs following failure of standard therapies. However, recent reports have disclosed that TMZ does not provide long-term control of many aggressive PitNETs. A further multidisciplinary approach is necessary for both reliable prediction and successful management of aggressive PitNETs.

Cystic versus non-cystic silent corticotrophic adenomas: clinical and histological analysis of 62 cases after microscopic transsphenoidal surgery-a retrospective, single-center study

Silent corticotrophic adenomas (SCAs) represent a rare group of non-functioning adenomas with a potentially aggressive clinical course. Cystic component is a very common finding among SCAs, but its clinical relevance has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical features of cystic and non-cystic SCAs, perioperative complications after microscopic transsphenoidal surgery, clinical outcome after first and repeat surgery along with risk factors for recurrence. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 62 silent corticotrophic adenomas treated at our university medical center via microscopic transsphenoidal surgery between January 2008 and July 2019. Parameters investigated included histology, invasiveness, intratumoral haemorrhage or cystic component on MRI, perioperative alteration of visual field, tumor size, pre- and postoperative ACTH, FSH, GH, LH, TSH, prolactin, cortisol, free T4, free T3, IGF-1, estrogen and testosterone levels, perioperative complications, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy along with clinical outcomes. A total of 62 patients were analyzed. The mean follow up was 28.3 months. Tumors with a cystic component occur statistically significant more often among male than non-cystic (80.6% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.02) and display lower rates of cavernous sinus invasion and sphenoid sinus invasion were significantly lower for cystic lesions comparing to non-cystic tumors (42.3% vs. 69.4%, p = 0.04 and 3.8% vs. 47.2%, p < 0.001). GTR after MTS was not statistically significant higher by cystic SCAs (80% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.09). Cystic lesions were also associated with higher risk of hyperprolactinemia (19.4% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.02) and only densely granulated cystic SCAs presented with preoperative intratumoral hemorrhage (19.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.01). Mean duration of first surgery was significantly shorter for cystic SCAs (71.6(± 18.7) vs. 94.8(± 31.1) minutes, p = 0.01). Preoperative pituitary insufficiency (25% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.49), intraoperative CSF space opening (21.1% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.32), along with postoperative new pituitary insufficiency (15% vs. 10%, p = 0.67) or diabetes insipidus/SIADH (10% vs. 13.3%, p > 0.99) with histological markers such as Ki67 (21.1% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.70) and p53 expression (6.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.39) as well as mitotic rate (5.3% vs. 10.3%, p > 0.99) were comparable between both groups. The presence of cystic component did not affect the tumor recurrence (10% vs. 16%, p = 0.68). Mean duration of surgery was first surgeries was not statistically shorter than repeat surgeries (85.4 ± 29.1 vs. 93.8 ± 28 min, p = 0.15). Patients undergoing first surgery had a higher probability of gross total resection (74.4% vs. 30%, p = 0.01) and lower probability of intraoperative CSF space opening (26% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.04) as well as a lower rate of preoperative anterior pituitary insufficiency (20% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.01). The incidence of new postoperative anterior pituitary insufficiency (10% vs. 0%, p = 0.57) and transient diabetes insipidus/SIADH (12% vs. 8.3%, p > 0.99) between those groups were comparable. No statistical difference was observed between patients with remission and with recurrent tumor regarding cortisol and ACTH levels, incidence of different histological subgroups, invasively growing tumors and lesions with cystic components as well as the percentage of cases with increased Ki67 proliferation index, p53 expression and mitotic indices. Our study presents one of the largest available cohorts of SCAs after microscopic transsphenoidal surgery and first clinical analysis of cystic versus non-cystic SCAs so far. We also performed the first comparison of index and repeat surgeries for this tumor entity. Cystic tumors presented with characteristic clinical aspects like male predominance, higher risk of hyperprolactinemia as well as lower rates of cavernous sinus and sphenoid sinus invasion comparing to non-cystic lesions. Mean duration of first surgery was significantly shorter for cystic SCAs. Moreover preoperative intratumoral hemorrhage had 100% specificity and 60% sensitivity for densely granulated cystic SCAs. All these clinical hallmarks may suggest a novel subgroup of SCAs with distinct clinical and biological features, however further clinical and molecular investigations are required. Second surgeries are associated with a higher incidence of preoperative pituitary insufficiency, and a higher risk of subtotal resection, and a higher probability of CSF space opening intraoperatively compared to first surgeries. On the other hand, the risk of new postoperative pituitary insufficiency was higher after first surgeries. In our cohort of patients, no prognostic factor for recurrence among histological diagnosis, Ki67-proliferation index, p53 expression, number of mitoses, invasive growth or cystic lesions for SCAs could be detected.

Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Head and Neck Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

This review article provides a brief overview of the new WHO classification by adopting a question-answer model to highlight the spectrum of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms which includes epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas) arising from upper aerodigestive tract and salivary glands, and special neuroendocrine neoplasms including middle ear neuroendocrine tumors (MeNET), ectopic or invasive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET; formerly known as pituitary adenoma) and Merkel cell carcinoma as well as non-epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (paragangliomas). The new WHO classification follows the IARC/WHO nomenclature framework and restricts the diagnostic term of neuroendocrine carcinoma to poorly differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms. In this classification, well-differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms are termed as neuroendocrine tumors (NET), and are graded as G1 NET (no necrosis and < 2 mitoses per 2 mm²; Ki67 < 20%), G2 NET (necrosis or 2-10 mitoses per 2 mm², and Ki67 < 20%) and G3 NET (> 10 mitoses per 2 mm² or Ki67 > 20%, and absence of poorly differentiated cytomorphology). Neuroendocrine carcinomas (> 10 mitoses per 2 mm², Ki67 > 20%, and often associated with a Ki67 > 55%) are further subtyped based on cytomorphological characteristics as small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. Unlike neuroendocrine carcinomas, head and neck NETs typically show no aberrant p53 expression or loss of RB reactivity. Ectopic or invasive PitNETs are subtyped using pituitary transcription factors (PIT1, TPIT, SF1, GATA3, ER-alpha), hormones and keratins (e.g., CAM5.2). The new classification emphasizes a strict correlation of morphology and immunohistochemical findings in the accurate diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms. A particular emphasis on the role of biomarkers in the confirmation of the neuroendocrine nature of a neoplasm and in the distinction of various neuroendocrine neoplasms is provided by reviewing ancillary tools that are available to pathologists in the diagnostic workup of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms. Furthermore, the role of molecular immunohistochemistry in the diagnostic workup of head and neck paragangliomas is discussed. The unmet needs in the field of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms are also discussed in this article. The new WHO classification is an important step forward to ensure accurate diagnosis that will also form the basis of ongoing research in this field.

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

In this review, we detail the changes and the relevant features that are applied to neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in the 2022 WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. Using a question-and-answer approach, we discuss the consolidation of the nomenclature that distinguishes neuronal paragangliomas from epithelial neoplasms, which are divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The criteria for these distinctions based on differentiation are outlined. NETs are generally (but not always) graded as G1, G2, and G3 based on proliferation, whereas NECs are by definition high grade; the importance of Ki67 as a tool for classification and grading is emphasized. The clinical relevance of proper classification is explained, and the importance of hormonal function is examined, including eutopic and ectopic hormone production. The tools available to pathologists for accurate classification include the conventional biomarkers of neuroendocrine lineage and differentiation, INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranins, and somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), but also include transcription factors that can identify the site of origin of a metastatic lesion of unknown primary site, as well as hormones, enzymes, and keratins that play a role in functional and structural correlation. The recognition of highly proliferative, well-differentiated NETs has resulted in the need for biomarkers that can distinguish these G3 NETs from NECs, including stains to determine expression of SSTRs and those that can indicate the unique molecular pathogenetic alterations that underlie the distinction, for example, global loss of RB and aberrant p53 in pancreatic NECs compared with loss of ATRX, DAXX, and menin in pancreatic NETs. Other differential diagnoses are discussed with recommendations for biomarkers that can assist in correct classification, including the distinctions between epithelial and non-epithelial NENs that have allowed reclassification of epithelial NETs in the spine, in the duodenum, and in the middle ear; the first two may be composite tumors with neuronal and glial elements, and as this feature is integral to the duodenal lesion, it is now classified as composite gangliocytoma/neuroma and neuroendocrine tumor (CoGNET). The many other aspects of differential diagnosis are detailed with recommendations for biomarkers that can distinguish NENs from non-neuroendocrine lesions that can mimic their morphology. The concepts of mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine (MiNEN) and amphicrine tumors are clarified with information about how to approach such lesions in routine practice. Theranostic biomarkers that assist patient management are reviewed. Given the significant proportion of NENs that are associated with germline mutations that predispose to this disease, we explain the role of the pathologist in identifying precursor lesions and applying molecular immunohistochemistry to guide genetic testing.