APASL clinical practice recommendation: how to treat HCV-infected patients with renal impairment?

Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection, Extrahepatic Disease and the Impact of New Direct-Acting Antivirals

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is an important cause of liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and death. Furthermore, it is estimated that about 40-70% of patients develop non-hepatic alterations in the course of chronic infection. Such manifestations can be immune-related conditions, lymphoproliferative disorders and metabolic alterations with serious adverse events in the short and long term. The introduction of new Direct-Acting Antivirals has shown promising results, with current evidence indicating an improvement and remission of these conditions after a sustained virological response.

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection previously treated with NS5A direct-acting antivirals: a real-world multicenter cohort in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Real-world data are scarce about the effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) for retreating East Asian patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who previously received NS5A direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). We conducted a multicenter study to assess the performance of SOF/VEL/VOX in patients who were not responsive to prior NS5A inhibitors in Taiwan.

METHODS

Between September 2021 and May 2022, 107 patients who failed NS5A inhibitor-containing DAAs with SOF/VEL/VOX salvage therapy for 12 weeks were included at 16 academic centers. The sustained virologic response at off-treatment week 12 (SVR12) was assessed in the evaluable (EP) and per-protocol (PP) populations. The safety profiles were also reported.

RESULTS

All patients completed 12 weeks of treatment and achieved an end-of-treatment virologic response. The SVR12 rates were 97.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92.1-99.0%) and 100% (95% CI 96.4-100%) in EP and PP populations. Three (2.8%) patients were lost to off-treatment follow-up and did not meet SVR12 in the EP population. No baseline factors predicted SVR12. Two (1.9%) not-fatal serious adverse events (AE) occurred but were unrelated to SOF/VEL/VOX. Sixteen (15.0%) had grade 2 total bilirubin elevation, and three (2.8%) had grade 2 alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation. Thirteen (81.3%) of the 16 patients with grade 2 total bilirubin elevation had unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. The estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were comparable between baseline and SVR12, regardless of baseline renal reserve.

CONCLUSIONS

SOF/VEL/VOX is highly efficacious and well-tolerated for East Asian HCV patients previously treated with NS5A inhibitor-containing DAAs.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

The study was not a drug trial. There was no need for clinical trial registration.

Pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals for patients with hepatitis C virus infection and chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem with significant clinical and economic burdens in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4 or 5. Current guidelines recommend pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) to be the first-line treatment of choice for HCV. This review summarizes the updated knowledge regarding the epidemiology, natural history, public health perspectives of HCV in patients with CKD stage 4 or 5, including those on maintenance dialysis, and the performance of pan-genotypic DAAs in these patients. The prevalence and incidence of HCV are much higher in patients with CKD stage 4 or 5 than in the general population. The prognosis is compromised if HCV patients are left untreated regardless of kidney transplantation (KT). Following treatment-induced HCV eradication, patient can improve the health-related outcomes by maintaining a long-term aviremic state. The sustained virologic response (SVR12) rates and safety profiles of pan-genotypic DAAs against HCV are excellent irrespective of KT. No dose adjustment of pan-genotypic DAAs is required across CKD stages. Assessing drug-drug interactions (DDIs) before HCV treatment is vital to secure on-treatment safety. The use of prophylactic or preemptive pan-genotypic DAAs in HCV-negative recipients who receive HCV-positive kidneys has shown promise in shortening KT waiting time, achieving excellent on-treatment efficacy and safety, and maintaining post-KT patient and graft survival. HCV elimination is highly feasible through multifaceted interventions, including mass screening, treatment scale-up, universal precautions, and post-SVR12 reinfection surveillance.

The Novel Finding of Dynamic Change in eGFR Up to One Year after End of Treatment in HCV-Infected Patients Receiving Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir

Background: The results of long-term renal evolution in HCV-infected patients using sofosbuvir and velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), with or without ribavirin (RBV), are lacking. Aims: We evaluated the renal safety for HCV-infected patients receiving SOF/VEL. Methods: Between 1 June 2019 and 6 July 2020, we included 594 HCV-infected patients receiving SOF/VEL +/− RBV for 12 weeks in Taiwan. Viral eradication rate (defined by sustained virological response at week 12 post-treatment; SVR12) and changes to renal function were considered. Results: SVR12 was achieved in 99.3% (590/594) upon per-protocol analysis. Patients saw improved hepatobiliary function and fibrosis after the start of SOF/VEL therapy. For renal function, those with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 (mL/min/1.73 m²) experienced transient on-treatment reduction in renal function that improved upon ending treatment, but recurrent eGFR degradation during one-year follow-up. The use of RBV (OR = 5.200, 95% CI: 1.983–13.634, p = 0.001) was a significant risk factor at SVR24, while diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.765, 95% CI: 1.104–6.922, p = 0.030) and the use of RBV (OR = 3.143, 95% CI: 1.047–9.435, p = 0.041) were identified as significant risk factors of worsening renal function at SVR48. SOF/VEL did not worsen renal function among those with stage 4–5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) who were not receiving dialysis. Conclusions: A trend of decline in eGFR at 1 year after SOF/VEL treatment was observed among diabetic patients with baseline eGFR ≥ 60 (mL/min/1.73 m²) and concomitant use of RBV. The close monitoring of renal function is warranted. Further study should be conducted in order to weigh the risks and benefit of RBV.

Safety and efficacy of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir in north Tohoku Japanese patients with genotype 1/2 hepatitis C virus infection

Background and aims

To assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in Japanese patients with genotype (GT) 1/2 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a real‐world clinical setting.

Methods

A total of 230 patients from 12 centers in northern Tohoku Japan with chronic hepatitis (CH) or compensated liver cirrhosis (LC) and GT1/2 HCV infection were treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and followed up for 12 weeks after treatment completion. Those patients were evaluated by dividing them into the following three groups: CH GT1/2 HCV‐infected, direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAA)‐naive patients received 8 weeks of treatment (8‐week initial treatment group), compensated LC GT1/2 HCV‐infected, DAA‐naive patients received 12 weeks of treatment (12‐week initial treatment group), and GT1/2 HCV‐infected patients with previous failed DAA treatment were assigned to 12‐week treatment (12‐week re‐treatment group).

Results

The overall sustained virologic response (SVR) rate in the modified intention‐to‐treat population was 99% (222/225). The SVR rate in 8‐week initial treatment group, 12‐week initial treatment group, and 12‐week re‐treatment group were 99% (118/119), 98% (104/106), and 97% (56/58), respectively. SVR rates based on chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage were 99% in stage 1/2, 96% in stage 3, and 100% in stage 4/5 patients. SVR rate among the three treatment groups was not influenced by CKD stage. Furthermore, all 18 patients (six in the 8‐week initial treatment group, 12 in 12‐week initial treatment group) who underwent hemodialysis attained SVR. Serious treatment‐associated adverse events (grade ≥ 3) occurred in 12 patients (5.2%). Five patients (2.2%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events; however, three of these patients achieved SVR.

Conclusion

Primary treatment and re‐treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir are effective and safe for patients without decompensated LC and GT1/2 HCV infection in a real‐world clinical setting. Furthermore, the SVR rate was not influenced by CKD stage.

Antiviral treatment and prognosis in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis due to hepatitis C virus

OBJECTIVES

Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) is one of the important renal replacement therapies for patients with end-stage renal disease. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a serious global public health problem. The proportion of MHD patients complicated with HCV infection and the risk of adverse prognosis are higher than those in the general population. Active antiviral treatment and prevention of reinfection is a combined treatment by nephrology and infection physicians. It is a widely accepted preventive measure to set hemodialysis buffer area for patients in treating HCV infection, but its effectiveness and safety still need to be further explored. Thus, the aim of this study is to explore the antiviral treatment and prognosis of MHD patients with HCV infection during hemodialysis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis for renal disease patients at 10 end-stage with long-term hemodialysis in the HCV area of the Blood Purification Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. After standard antiviral drug treatment, the patient reached the cure standard for HCV infection. The buffer zone was set up in the Blood Purification Center by the Department of Nephrology of Xiangya Hospital since April 2017. Patients cured of HCV infection were transferred from the HCV area to the buffer zone for continuous dialysis, accompanied by monitoring serum HCV-RNA, anti-HCV antibody levels and changes in clinical biochemical indicators following the status of reinfection.

RESULTS

Ten patients with HCV infection were finally cured after antiviral treatment, and there were no significant changes in clinical biochemical indicators before and after treatment. In the followed-up period after the transfer, the patient continued to be negative for HCV-RNA and positive for anti-HCV antibody.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct antiviral therapy is safe and effective in MHD patients with HCV infection. Active antiviral therapy and transferring to the buffer area for dialysis are new and effective treatment modes for HCV patients during MHD.

Establishment of an outreach, grouping healthcare system to achieve microelimination of HCV for uremic patients in haemodialysis centres (ERASE-C)

OBJECTIVE

HCV prevails in uremic haemodialysis patients. The current study aimed to achieve HCV microelimination in haemodialysis centres through a comprehensive outreach programme.

DESIGN

The ERASE-C Campaign is an outreach programme for the screening, diagnosis and group treatment of HCV encompassing 2323 uremic patients and 353 medical staff members from 18 haemodialysis centres. HCV-viremic subjects were linked to care for directly acting antiviral therapy or received on-site sofosbuvir/velpatasvir therapy. The objectives were HCV microelimination (>80% reduction of the HCV-viremic rate 24 weeks after the end of the campaign in centres with ≥90% of the HCV-viremic patients treated) and 'No-C HD' (no HCV-viremic subjects at the end of follow-up).

RESULTS

At the preinterventional screening, 178 (7.7%) uremic patients and 2 (0.6%) staff members were HCV-viremic. Among them, 146 (83.9%) uremic patients received anti-HCV therapy (41 link-to-care; 105 on-site sofosbuvir/velpatasvir). The rates of sustained virological response (SVR12, undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after the end of treatment) in the full analysis set and per-protocol population were 89.5% (94/105) and 100% (86/86), respectively, in the on-site treatment group, which were comparable with the rates of 92.7% (38/41) and 100% (38/38), respectively, in the link-to-care group. Eventually, the HCV-viremic rate decreased to 0.9% (18/1,953), yielding an 88.3% reduction from baseline. HCV microelimination and 'No-C HD' were achieved in 92.3% (12/13) and 38.9% (7/18) of the haemodialysis centres, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Outreach strategies with mass screenings and on-site group treatment greatly facilitated HCV microelimination in the haemodialysis population.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03803410 and NCT03891550.

Efficacy of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir for Real-World HCV Infected Patients in the Northern Part of Tokyo, Japan

Hepatis virus C (HCV) infection causes liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. The objective of our study was to examine the effects of the HCV nonstructural protein (NS) 3/4A inhibitor glecaprevir/NS5A inhibitor pibrentasvir on real-world HCV patients in the northern part of Tokyo, Japan. Although 106 patients were consecutively included, a total of 102 HCV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis or compensated cirrhosis, who received 8- or 12-week combination treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and were followed up to week 12 after the end of treatment were analyzed retrospectively. Only three patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events; however, they achieved a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12). Finally, SVR rates were 99.0% (101/102). Only one patient without liver cirrhosis was a treatment relapser who received hepatic resection for HCC approximately two years after commencement of the 8-week combination treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. After the exclusion of patients with HCV genotype 1b and P32 deletion in the HCV NS5A region, a 12-week combination of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir led to SVR12 in all nine direct-acting antiviral-experienced patients. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir had a high efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for real-world HCV patients in a single hospital in Japan.

Achieving WHO target of HCV control in Hong Kong: challenges and strategies

With the introduction of effective directly acting antiviral agents (DAAs) therapy, control and elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is becoming a feasible goal. In Hong Kong, HCV prevalence in general population is 0.3%-0.5% over the past decades. However, like other high-income areas/countries, high prevalence of HCV infection has been found in several population groups, such as people who inject drugs (PWID), patients undergoing dialysis, and human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/ AIDS) patients. Based on the epidemiological study using data retrieved from the Hong Kong HCV Registry from January 2005 to March 2017, the estimated territory-wide diagnosis rate and treatment rate of HCV infection were only 50.9% and 12.4%, respectively. Although these rates was comparable to many developed countries/areas, the performances remained substantially below 90% and 80%, the 2030 targets proposed by World Health Organization (WHO). In recognition of the challenges, the Hong Kong Government set up the Steering Committee on Prevention and Control of Viral Hepatitis (SCVH) which formulated the Hong Kong Viral Hepatitis Action Plan 2020-2024. The Action Plan adopts four key strategies, as described in the WHO framework for global action, namely, awareness, surveillance, prevention and treatment. With the effective implementation of the Action Plan, especially in targeted screening of high-risk populations and more generalized use of the highly efficacious DAAs for all diagnosed HCV subjects, the goals of reducing HCV transmission and HCV-related morbidity and mortality can be achieved in Hong Kong by 2030.

Follow-Up of Patients Who Achieved Sustained Virologic Response after Interferon-Free Treatment against Hepatitis C Virus: Focus on Older Patients

Background and Objectives: Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have improved sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Our aim was to elucidate the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to compare the outcomes of patients aged 75 years or older (older group) with those of patients younger than 75 years (younger group) after SVR. Materials and Methods: Among 441 patients treated with interferon-free DAA combinations, a total of 409 SVR patients were analyzed. We compared the two age groups in terms of HCC incidence and mortality rates. Results: Older and younger groups consisted of 68 and 341 patients, respectively. Occurrence of HCC after SVR did not differ between the two groups of patients with a history of HCC. Occurrence of HCC after SVR was observed more in younger patients without a history of HCC (p < 0.01). Although older patients without a history of HCC had a higher mortality rate (p < 0.01), their causes of death were not associated with liver diseases. Among younger patients without a history of HCC, none died. Conclusions: After SVR, liver disease may not be a prognostic factor in older HCV patients without a history of HCC.

Evolutionary seroepidemiology of viral hepatitis and the gap in hepatitis C care cascades among uraemic patients receiving haemodialysis in Taiwan-the Formosa-Like Group

Uraemic patients undergoing haemodialysis are at high risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We aimed to evaluate the evolutionary seroprevalence of viral hepatitis and the gap in HCV care cascades in this special population by a large-scale surveillance study in Taiwan. Uraemic patients on maintenance haemodialysis from 22 sites (FORMOSA-LIKE group) in 2012 (n = 1,680) and 2019 (n = 2,326) were recruited for this study. The distributions and sequential changes of viral hepatitis markers were analysed. The prevalence of anti-HCV antibody and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositivity was 13.6% (316/2326) and 11.5% (267/2326), respectively, in 2019 compared with 17.3% (290/1680, P = .002) and 13.6% (229/1680, P = .046), respectively, in 2012. The HCV-viremic rate among anti-HCV-seropositive patients was significantly lower in 2019 than in 2012 (56.3% [178/316] vs. 73.8% [214/290], P < .001). The HCV treatment rate increased from 2.3% (5/217) in 2012 to 21.7% (49/226) in 2019 (P < .001). In the sequential analysis of the 490 patients who participated in both screens, 17 of the 55 HCV-viremic patients became HCV RNA seronegative, including 13 by antivirals and four spontaneously. By contrast, one anti-HCV-seropositive but nonviremic patient became viremic, and six anti-HCV-seronegative patients became anti-HCV-seropositive in 2019. The annual incidence of new HCV was 0.2%/year. Seven HBsAg-seropositive patients experienced HBsAg loss (1.25%/year). Two patients had new anti-HBc seropositivity (new HBV exposure: 0.57%/year). The seroprevalence of viral hepatitis decreased in an 8-year follow-up but remained prevalent, and the treatment of HCV infection was underutilized in uraemic patients. Additional efforts are needed to enhance the HCV treatment uptake of uraemic patients. Clinical Trial IDs: NCT03803410, NCT01766895.

INASL-ISN Joint Position Statements on Management of Patients with Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Disease

Renal dysfunction is very common among patients with chronic liver disease, and concomitant liver disease can occur among patients with chronic kidney disease. The spectrum of clinical presentation and underlying etiology is wide when concomitant kidney and liver disease occur in the same patient. Management of these patients with dual onslaught is challenging and requires a team approach of hepatologists and nephrologists. No recent guidelines exist on algorithmic approach toward diagnosis and management of these challenging patients. The Indian National Association for Study of Liver (INASL) in association with Indian Society of Nephrology (ISN) endeavored to develop joint guidelines on diagnosis and management of patients who have simultaneous liver and kidney disease. For generating these guidelines, an INASL-ISN Taskforce was constituted, which had members from both the societies. The taskforce first identified contentious issues on various aspects of simultaneous liver and kidney diseases, which were allotted to individual members of the taskforce who reviewed them in detail. A round-table meeting of the Taskforce was held on 20-21 October 2018 at New Delhi to discuss, debate, and finalize the consensus statements. The evidence and recommendations in these guidelines have been graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system with minor modifications. The strength of recommendations (strong and weak) thus reflects the quality (grade) of underlying evidence (I, II, III). We present here the INASL-ISN Joint Position Statements on Management of Patients with Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Disease.

Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir combination is safe and effective in treating chronic hepatitis C in end-stage renal disease on maintenance haemodialysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is emerging data on the use of Sofosbuvir-based directly acting antiviral (DAA) drug regimens in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on maintenance haemodialysis (MHD). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of Sofosbuvir plus Velpatasvir fixed-dose combination in CHC patients with ESRD on MHD.

METHODS

Fifty-one CHC patients with ESRD on MHD were included in a real-life prospective study. All patients irrespective of genotype; presence of cirrhosis; treatment naive or experienced status were treated with full-dose Sofosbuvir (400 mg) plus Velpatasvir (100 mg) fixed-dosed combination given daily for 12 weeks. The efficacy was assessed by the sustained virological response (SVR12) with negative HCV RNA 12 weeks after the end of treatment (ETR). Side effects if any were recorded in all patients.

RESULTS

The median HCV RNA level in 51 CHC patients [Males 41 (80.4%), mean age 42.8 ± 14.6 years] was 2.0 × 10⁶ IU/mL. HCV genotype was available in 19 patients with predominant genotype 1 in 15 (79%) patients. Ten (19.6%) patients had evidence of cirrhosis (defined as LSM ≥ 12.5 kPa on Transient Elastography), and 8 (15.6%) patients were treatment experienced. Testing for ETR was done in 36 patients and all 36 (100%) patients achieved ETR, and 49 patients (96%) achieved SVR 12. All 51 patients tolerated the Sofosbuvir + Velpatasvir combination, with none of the patients reporting any serious adverse event.

CONCLUSION

Sofosbuvir plus Velpatasvir fixed-dose combination is safe and effective in treating CHC in patients with ESRD on MHD.

Chronic renal dysfunction in cirrhosis: A new frontier in hepatology

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with liver cirrhosis has become a new frontier in hepatology. In recent years, a sharp increase in the diagnosis of CKD has been observed among patients with cirrhosis. The rising prevalence of risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, appears to have contributed significantly to the high prevalence of CKD. Moreover, the diagnosis of CKD in cirrhosis is now based on a reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate of < 60 mL/min over more than 3 mo. This definition has resulted in a better differentiation of CKD from acute kidney injury (AKI), leading to its greater recognition. It has also been noted that a significant proportion of AKI transforms into CKD in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. CKD in cirrhosis can be structural CKD due to kidney injury or functional CKD secondary to circulatory and neurohormonal imbalances. The available literature on combined cirrhosis-CKD is extremely limited, as most attempts to assess renal dysfunction in cirrhosis have so far concentrated on AKI. Due to problems related to glomerular filtration rate estimation in cirrhosis, the absence of reliable biomarkers of CKD and technical difficulties in performing renal biopsy in advanced cirrhosis, CKD in cirrhosis can present many challenges for clinicians. With combined hepatorenal dysfunctions, fluid mobilization becomes problematic, and there may be difficulties with drug tolerance, hemodialysis and decision-making regarding the need for liver vs simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation. This paper offers a thorough overview of the increasingly known CKD in patients with cirrhosis, with clinical consequences and difficulties occurring in the diagnosis and treatment of such patients.

HCV GT1b-patient with alanine aminotransferase elevation and sustained virologic response achieved by grazoprevir/elbasvir discontinuation

In the present Japanese female patient with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation greater than 500 IU/l during combination therapy with grazoprevir/elbasvir against HCV infection, this therapy was stopped at week 8. However, sustained virologic response was achieved. In the present report, we also focused on ALT elevation and sustained virologic response during and after antiviral therapies. The current case report demonstrates that careful monitoring of liver function tests may be required during direct-acting antiviral therapy against HCV infection because it is now possible to treat patients with polypharmacy, patients with chronic kidney disease, patients with cirrhosis or aged patients. Careful attention should be paid to liver damage as one of the adverse events in the use of HCV nonstructural protein 3/4A protease inhibitors. Of interest, many publications have addressed both ALT elevations during direct-acting antiviral therapy and viral clearance in relatively short treatment durations.

Glecaprevir-pibrentasvir for chronic hepatitis C: Comparing treatment effect in patients with and without end-stage renal disease in a real-world setting

INTRODUCTION

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is increasingly observed in patients with renal disease. With the introduction of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) as a pan-genotype therapy for HCV, treatment efficacy is expected to rise.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of GLE/PIB treatment in adults with HCV infection and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR) observed 12 weeks after completed treatment.

RESULTS

We enrolled 235 patients, including 44 patients with ESRD. Median age was 60 years, and 48% were males. Twenty-two percent had cirrhosis. HCV genotypes 1 (43%) and 2 (41%) were the most common. The overall SVR rate was 96.6%. Patients with ESRD were older than those without (67.6 years vs 58.3 years, p < 0.001) and trended toward having a higher prevalence of cirrhosis (32% vs 19%, p = 0.071). A significant proportion of patients with ESRD complained of skin itching during treatment (61% vs 26%, p < 0.001), and the SVR rate were similar between these two groups (95.45% vs 96.86%, p = 0.644).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a higher rate of pruritus among patients with ESRD, GLE/PIB-based therapy achieved similarly high SVR rates among patients with and without ESRD.

Danoprevir for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection: Design, Development, and Place in Therapy

On June 8, 2018, an NS3/4A protease inhibitor called danoprevir was approved in China to treat the infections of HCV genotype (GT) 1b – the most common HCV genotype worldwide. Based on phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, the 12-week regimen of ritonavir-boosted danoprevir (danoprevir/r) plus peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin offered 97.1% (200/206) of sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) in treatment-naïve non-cirrhotic patients infected with HCV genotype 1b. Adverse events such as anemia, fatigue, fever, and headache were associated with the inclusion of peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin in the danoprevir-based regimen. Moreover, drug resistance to danoprevir could be traced to amino acid substitutions (Q80K/R, R155K, D168A/E/H/N/T/V) near the drug-binding pocket of HCV NS3 protease. Despite its approval, the clinical use of danoprevir is currently limited to its combination with peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin, thereby driving its development towards interferon-free, ribavirin-free regimens with improved tolerability and adherence. In the foreseeable future, pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals with better clinical efficacy and less adverse events will be available to treat HCV infections worldwide.

Hepatitis c virus and chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with an increased incidence and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), as well as higher mortality in CKD and renal transplant patients. Direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have revolutionized the treatment of HCV, with viral eradication attained in 90-100% of treated patients. DAAs have an excellent safety and tolerability profile in CKD and renal transplant patients.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the association of HCV with incidence and progression of CKD as well as its effect on outcomes and mortality. We also discuss the available treatment options in patients with CKD and renal transplant and in HCV-associated glomerular disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of newly available direct acting anti-viral agents has revolutionized the treatment of HCV in persons with advanced CKD and undergoing dialysis. With these regimens, viral eradication can be attained in 90-100% of the treated patients. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of these drugs in renal transplant patients have also made it possible to use HCV-infected grafts and successful virus eradication at a later stage.

Pre-existing minor variants with NS5A L31M/V-Y93H double substitution are closely linked to virologic failure with asunaprevir plus daclatasvir treatment for genotype 1b hepatitis C virus infection

Background

L31 and Y93 in the NS5A region of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most important substitution positions associated with resistance to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment.

Methods

We analyzed the frequency of NS5A L31M/V and Y93/H in NS5A inhibitor-naive HCV genotype 1 patients who received asunaprevir plus daclatasvir combination treatment using a conventional sequencing method and a deep sequencing method that can distinguish a single substitution at either position and a double substitution at both positions with a 0.1% detection threshold.

Results

The frequency of substitutions at both sites using the conventional method was very low, with 1 in 14 non-responders and 0 in 42 randomly selected responder patients. On the other hand, for the deep sequencing method, cases with double substitutions in the tandem sequence were detected in 8/14 non-responders and 1/42 responders (p<0.0001). For the conventional method, substitutions were detected at any position in 6/14 non-responders and 2/42 responders (p = 0.0019), with a clear difference between the two groups. The difference was also clear with the deep sequencing method, with 11/14 non-responders and 8/42 responders. Interestingly, for the deep sequencing method, the single substitution of L31 was found in 6/14 non-responders and 7/42 responders, whereas single substitutions of Y93 or double substitutions were found in 7/14 vs. 1/42 and 8/14 vs. 1/42 patients, respectively.

Conclusions

NS5A L31 and Y93 substitutions were detected in tandem by the deep sequencing methods in several genotype 1 patients, who may be more resistant to DAA treatment containing an NS5A inhibitor.

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and severe renal impairment

Data are limited regarding the real-world effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and severe renal impairment (RI). We aimed to evaluate the performance of GLE/PIB in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4 or 5 in Taiwan. 108 chronic HCV patients with CKD stage 4 (n = 32) or 5 (n = 76) receiving GLE/PIB for 8-12 weeks were retrospectively recruited at 4 academic centres in Taiwan. The effectiveness was determined by sustained virologic response at off-therapy week 12 (SVR12 ) for evaluable (EP) and per-protocol populations (PP). The safety profiles were also assessed. By EP and PP analyses, the SVR12 rate was 99.1% (107 of 108 patients; 95% confidence interval (CI): 94.9%-99.8%) and 100% (107 of 107 patients; 95% CI: 96.5%-100%). The SVR12 rates were 100% (95% CI: 89.3%-100%) and 98.7% (95% CI: 92.9%-99.8%) in patients with CKD stage 4 and 5, respectively. One patient, who declined off-therapy follow-up after permanently discontinuing GLE/PIB at on-treatment week 9 due to scheduled cardiac surgery, had nonvirologic failure. Sixteen (14.8%) patients had serious adverse events (AEs), which were judged not related to GLE/PIB. The three most common AEs were pruritus (19.4%), fatigue (15.7%) and nausea (13.9%). None had ≥3-fold upper limit of normal for total bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase levels. None of the 9 patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection developed HBV-associated hepatitis. In conclusion, GLE/PIB for 8-12 weeks is effective and well-tolerated in HCV patients with severe RI.

Cell Culture Systems and Drug Targets for Hepatitis A Virus Infection

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection is one of the major causes of acute hepatitis, and this infection occasionally causes acute liver failure. HAV infection is associated with HAV-contaminated food and water as well as sexual transmission among men who have sex with men. Although an HAV vaccine has been developed, outbreaks of hepatitis A and life-threatening severe HAV infections are still observed worldwide. Therefore, an improved HAV vaccine and anti-HAV drugs for severe hepatitis A should be developed. Here, we reviewed cell culture systems for HAV infection, and other issues. This review may help with improving the HAV vaccine and developing anti-HAV drugs.

The effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in chronic hepatitis C patients with refractory factors in the real world: a comprehensive analysis of a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting anti-virals (DAAs) have markedly improved the effectiveness of anti-viral therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. In a phase III trial in Japan, treatment with the NS3/4A protease inhibitor glecaprevir and the NS5A inhibitor pibrentasvir (G/P) resulted in a small number of patients with refractory factors. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of G/P, especially among patients with these refractory factors, and the influence of these factors on treatment.

METHODS

In a prospective, multicenter study involving 33 medical institutions, 1439 patients were treated with G/P, and their efficacy, safety, and most frequent adverse effects (AEs) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall SVR12 rates were 99.1% (1397/1410) in the per-protocol-analysis, and genotype sustained virologic response SVR12 rates were: genotype 1, 99.4% (707/711); genotype 2, 99.4% (670/674); genotype 3, 80.0% (16/20). DAA-naïve patients (p = 0.008) with HCV genotype except 3 (genotype 1 vs. 3, p = 2.68 × 10-5; genotype 2 vs. 3, p = 3.28 × 10-5) had significantly higher SVR12 rates. No significant difference was observed between CKD stage 1-3 (99.1% [1209/1220]) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4-5 (98.9% [188/190]) patients, or between cirrhotic (99.0% [398/402]) and non-cirrhotic (99.1% [999/1008]) patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that genotype 3 [OR 33.404, 95% CI (7.512-148.550), p value (p = 4.06 × 10-5)] and past experience of IFN-free DAAs [OR 3.977, 95% CI (1.153-13.725), p value (p = 0.029)] were both significantly independent predictors of non-SVR12. AEs were reported in 28.2% of patients, and 1.6% discontinued treatment owing to drug-related AEs. AEs were significantly higher in CKD stage 4-5 (41.6% [79/190]) than CKD stage 1-3 (26.1% [319/1220]) patients (p = 2.00 × 10-5). AEs were also significantly higher in cirrhotic (38.6% [155/402]) than in non-cirrhotic (24.1% [243/1008]) (p = 2.91 × 10-18) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

G/P regimen is highly effective and safe to treat CHC patients even with refractory factors such as CKD and advanced liver fibrosis. However, patients with past experience of IFN-free DAA treatment and genotype 3, CKD stage 4 or 5, and advanced liver fibrosis should be more closely observed.

Developments in the treatment of HCV genotype 3 infection

Introduction: Unlike other hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes (GTs), patients infected with GT3 are associated with an increased risk of accelerated liver disease progression. Although early immuno-modulator therapies yielded moderate sustained virologic response (SVR) rates, treatment of GT3 patients has proven more challenging in the era of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Areas covered: The review provides an overview of the evolution of therapies against GT3 since the approval of the first immunomodulatory agent nearly 30 years ago. Expert opinion: A greater choice of treatment options is now available for HCV GT3-infected patients. In treatment-naïve patients with or without compensated cirrhosis, SVR rates are comparably high approaching 100% irrespective of treatment option. For treatment-experienced patients, choosing the right therapy is important, especially for those with advanced liver disease. For the few patients who fail with multiple persistent highly resistant DAA substitutions, retreatment options are limited. Additional real-world treatment comparisons are required to confirm differences in SVR in these more difficult-to-treat patients. This also includes patients infected with GT3 subtypes such as GT3b where multiple DAA-resistant substitutions occur naturally. In the absence of new drugs with non-overlapping drug-resistant profiles, an interferon-based therapy may still be beneficial in select patient populations with high-level multiple DAA-resistant substitutions.

Management of HCV patients in cases of direct-acting antiviral failure

Introduction: Over 70 million people are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), increasing the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Areas covered: Since the approval of the first interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy in 2011, a number of DAAs have been approved, and HCV is now considered curable. Until recently, however, there were no clear guidelines on how to re-treat patients who fail DAA therapy. Current protease inhibitors (PIs) are generally unaffected by earlier resistance-associated variants (RAVs), but many NS5A inhibitors continue to have overlapping resistance profiles, and NS5A RAVs can persist even in the absence of DAAs. Expert opinion: Fortunately, RAVs affecting NS5B polymerase inhibitors are rare, making sofosbuvir a safe choice as the backbone of re-treatment therapies. Recent re-treatment guidelines that take into account genotype, fibrosis, treatment history, and RAV suggest that >90% of patients with prior treatment failures can be successfully re-treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir.

Successful retreatment with 12 weeks of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir for a genotype 2a HCV-infected hemodialysis patient who failed to respond to 8 weeks of prior glecaprevir and pibrentasvir therapy

Although NS3/4 protease inhibitor glecaprevir (GLE) plus NS5A inhibitor pibrentasvir (PIB) therapy has a high efficacy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with hemodialysis, some patients fail to respond to the therapy. Here, we report a hemodialysis genotype 2 HCV-infected patient who achieved sustained virological response (SVR) by 12 weeks of GLE/PIB therapy after failing to respond to 8 weeks of GLE/PIB therapy. A 44-year-old man with chronic genotype 2a HCV-infection without any evidence of cirrhosis and who was undergoing hemodialysis received GLE/PIB therapy. He completed 8 weeks of therapy, but his serum HCV relapsed after the end of therapy. No resistance-associated substitutions were detected in the NS3 region, but NS5A-C92C/S was detected by direct sequence analysis prior to the start of therapy and subsequently shifted to NS5A-C92S at the time of HCV relapse. Four months after initial GLE/PIB therapy, he started a 12-week course of GLE/PIB retreatment. Serum HCV RNA level became and remained undetectable during the therapy and never relapsed after the end of the treatment. Finally, he succeeded in achieving sustained virological response following 12 weeks of GLE/PIB retreatment.