Predicting compliance and survival in palliative whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases

Physical activity in the context of advanced breast cancer: An integrative review

AIMS

To describe and synthesize diverse empirical evidence regarding physical activity (PA) in the context of advanced breast cancer (ABC).

DESIGN

Integrative review guided by the work of Whittemore and Knafl (2005).

DATA SOURCES

Six electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant literature published between January 2007-June 2019.

REVIEW METHODS

Abstracts of papers that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed by two researchers and full texts of eligible papers were assessed. Data were extracted by two independent researchers and inter-rater reliability of data extraction established. Quality of papers was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were organized according to comprehensive thematic analysis and the biobehavioural model for the study of exercise interventions.

RESULTS

Of the 532 abstracts, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria which included six randomized controlled trials, one quantitative non-randomized study, seven quantitative descriptive studies, three mixed method studies and one qualitative study. Results from studies enrolled fell into four domains: PA performance and its influence on survival; barriers and preferences for PA; interventions to enhance PA; perceived benefits of PA from qualitative feedback.

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that ABC patients are physically inactive. Main barriers of PA are less aerobic fitness and heavy symptom burden. Simple, tailored and specialist-supervised PA is preferred by ABC patients. Form of joint self-instructed and group accompanying is advocated as well. PA intervention programmes identified in this review vary on type, intensity, duration and frequency, while generally, are found to be feasible, safe and beneficial to patients' physical and psychosocial well-being.

IMPACT

The results propose tailored, supervised, group-based PA programmes are in urgent need for ABC patients. Clinical professionals should manage more feasible and safer PA interventions to help improve patients' overall health. More research with rigorous methodology design is warranted to explore PA's effect on long-term health outcomes.

Do Patients Feel Well Informed in a Radiation Oncology Service?

Information received by cancer patients has gained importance in recent decades. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perception of information received by oncological patients in a radiotherapy department and to measure the importance of the other information sources. A cross-sectional study was conducted, evaluating patients who received radiotherapy. All the patients were asked two questionnaires: the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module evaluating their satisfaction with received information, and a questionnaire analyzing other sources of information search. One hundred patients between 27 and 84 years were enrolled. Breast cancer (26 %) was the commonest cancer. Patients felt better informed about the medical tests and secondly about the performed treatment. The younger patients were those who were more satisfied with the information received and patients with no formal education felt less satisfied, with statistically significant differences. Patients did not seek external information; at the most, they asked relatives and other people with cancer. Patients were satisfied with the received information, although a high percentage would like more information. In general, patients did not search for external information sources. Age and educational level seem to influence in the satisfaction with the received information.

Radiotherapy for brain metastases in southern Thailand: workload, treatment pattern and survival

PURPOSE

To study the patient load, treatment pattern, survival outcome and its predictors in patients with brain metastases treated by radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for patients with brain metastases treated by radiotherapy between 2003 and 2007 were collected from medical records, the hospital information system database, and a population-based tumor registry database until death or at least 5 years after treatment and retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The number of treatments for brain metastases gradually increased from 48 in 2003 to 107 in 2007, with more than 70% from lung and breast cancers. The majority were treated with whole brain radiation of 30 Gy (3 Gy X 10 fractions) by cobalt-60 machine, using radiation alone. The overall median survival of the 418 patients was 3.9 months. Cohort analysis of relative survival after radiotherapy was as follows: 52% at 3 months, 18% at 1 year and 3% at 5 years in males; and 66% at 3 months, 26% at 1 year and 7% at 5 years in females. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the patients treated with combined modalities had a better prognosis. Poor prognostic factors included primary cancer from the lung or gastrointestinal tract, emergency or urgent consultation, poor performance status (ECOG 3-4), and a hemoglobin level before treatment of less than 10 g/dl.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified an increasing trend of patient load with brain metastases. Possible over-treatment and under-treatment were demonstrated with a wide range of survival results. Practical prognostic scoring systems to assist in decision-making for optimal treatment of different patient groups is absolutely necessary; it is a key strategy for balancing good quality of care and patient load.

Quality assurance in radiotherapy: analysis of the causes of not starting or early radiotherapy withdrawal

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyse the reasons for not starting or for early of radiotherapy at the Radiation Oncology Department.

METHODS

All radiotherapy treatments from March 2010 to February 2012 were included. Early withdrawals from treatment those that never started recorded. Clinical, demographic and dosimetric variables were also noted.

RESULTS

From a total of 3250 patients treated and reviewed, 121 (4%) did not start or complete the planned treatment. Of those, 63 (52%) did not receive any radiotherapy fraction and 58 (48%) did not complete the course, 74% were male and 26% were female. The mean age was 67 ± 13 years. The most common primary tumour was lung (28%), followed by rectum (16%). The aim of treatment was 62% radical and 38% palliative, 44% of patients had metastases; the most common metastatic site was bone, followed by brain. In 38% of cases (46 patients) radiotherapy was administered concomitantly with chemotherapy (10 cases (22%) were rectal cancers). The most common reason for not beginning or for early withdrawal of treatment was clinical progression (58/121, 48%). Of those, 43% died (52/121), 35 of them because of the progression of the disease and 17 from other causes. Incomplete treatment regimens were due to toxicity (12/121 (10%), of which 10 patients underwent concomitant chemotherapy for rectal cancer).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of patients who did not complete their course of treatment is low, which shows good judgement in indications and patient selection. The most common reason for incomplete treatments was clinical progression. Rectal cancer treated with concomitant chemotherapy was the most frequent reason of the interruption of radiotherapy for toxicity.

[Cognitive evaluation during brain radiotherapy in adults: a simple assessment is possible]

Brain irradiation can be used for the treatment of cancers in different protocols: focal radiotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy, with or without additive dose on the tumour. Different modalities (conformational, stereotactic radiosurgery) can be used for curative or prophylactic treatment. Brain radiotherapy leads to cognitive deterioration with subcortical profile. This cognitive deterioration can be associated to radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy on brain MRI. Taking into account radiation induced cognitive troubles is becoming more important with the prolonged survival allowed by treatment improvement. Concerning low-grade gliomas, radiation-induced cognitive troubles appear about 6 years after treatment and occur earlier when the fraction dose is important. Primitive cerebral lymphoma treatment can induce cognitive troubles in 25 to 30% surviving patients. These deficits are more frequent in elderly patients, leading to radiotherapy delay in those patients. Patients treated for brain metastasis often have cognitive impairment before radiotherapy (until 66%), this pretreatment impairment is related to global survival. The use of conformational radiation therapy, particularly with hippocampal sparing is conceptually interesting but has not proved its efficiency for cognitive preservation in clinical trials yet. Stereotactic radiation therapy could be an interesting compromise between metastatic tumoral volume reduction and cognitive preservation. Taking care of radiotherapy induced cognitive troubles is a challenge. Before considering its treatment and prevention, we need to elaborate a way of detecting them using a reliable and easy way. CSCT, a computerized test whose execution needs 90 seconds, could be used before treatment and during the clinical follow-up by the patient's oncologist or radiotherapist. If the patient's performance reduces, he can be oriented to a neurologist in order to perform fuller evaluation of its cognitive capacities and be treated if necessary.

Early volumetric change and treatment outcome of metastatic brain tumors after external beam radiotherapy: differential radiotherapy for brain metastasis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment outcomes of low-dose whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT)-based differential radiation therapy (RT) for metastatic brain tumors.

METHODS

A total of 242 targets (metastatic brain lesions) were analyzed in the present study. Median WBRT dose and number of fractions were 25 (range 25-35) Gy and 10 (range 8-15) fractions, respectively. A median normalized total dose (NTD) of 1.8 Gy (NTD(1.8Gy)) to the metastatic lesion was 45 (range 27-64.8) Gy. We numbered and contoured each metastatic lesion sequentially using computed tomography fused with serial magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate volumetric changes.

RESULTS

The 6-month and 1-year freedom from remote intracranial failure rates were 87.7 and 58.5 %, respectively. The 6-month actuarial local control (LC) rate was 93.4 %. Tumor diameter was a major determinant for LC, and tumor histology was a significant parameter predicting the volume reduction rate. With overall complete response (CR) rate of 56.6 % after RT, CR rate, if the target was more than 1 cm in size, was 25 % with a median NTD(1.8Gy) of 45 Gy, requiring dose escalation to achieve better target regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose WBRT with selective boost was feasible and effective. Our results pose the rationale of future trial of differential radiation therapy (RT), which prescribes different radiation dose according to the tumor density in metastatic brain tumors.