Subcutaneous Rituximab for the Treatment of B-Cell Hematologic Malignancies: A Review of the Scientific Rationale and Clinical Development

Antibody desolvation with sodium chloride and acetonitrile generates bioactive protein nanoparticles

About 30% of the FDA approved drugs in 2021 were protein-based therapeutics. However, therapeutic proteins can be unstable and rapidly eliminated from the blood, compared to conventional drugs. Furthermore, on-target but off-tumor protein binding can lead to off-tumor toxicity, lowering the maximum tolerated dose. Thus, for effective treatment therapeutic proteins often require continuous or frequent administration. To improve protein stability, delivery and release, proteins can be encapsulated inside drug delivery systems. These drug delivery systems protect the protein from degradation during (targeted) transport, prevent premature release and allow for long-term, sustained release. However, thus far achieving high protein loading in drug delivery systems remains challenging. Here, the use of protein desolvation with acetonitrile as an intermediate step to concentrate monoclonal antibodies for use in drug delivery systems is reported. Specifically, trastuzumab, daratumumab and atezolizumab were desolvated with high yield (∼90%) into protein nanoparticles below 100 nm with a low polydispersity index (<0.2). Their size could be controlled by the addition of low concentrations of sodium chloride between 0.5 and 2 mM. Protein particles could be redissolved in aqueous solutions and redissolved antibodies retained their binding activity as evaluated in cell binding assays and exemplified for trastuzumab in an ELISA.

Clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous rituximab in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The role of subcutaneous (SC) rituximab in the efficacy and safety to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is not clear enough. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous rituximab to NHL.

METHOD

A full-scale search was carried out based on the set search terms in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL until 12 October 2022 to identify relevant studies of subcutaneous rituximab for NHL. The efficacy and safety outcomes included complete response (CR) plus unconfirmed complete response (CRu), adverse events (AEs), grade ≥3 AEs, serious adverse events (SAEs), administration-related reactions (ARRs), adverse reaction rates.

RESULTS

From a total of 758 studies, 9 trials were eligible. The CR/CRu of patients with NHL receiving SC rituximab was 57%, 55% for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 54% for Follicular lymphoma (FL). The meta-analysis performed on safety demonstrated that AEs of NHL patients with SC rituximab was 85%, grade ≥3 AEs was 38%, SAE was 27% and ARR was 33%. The result also showed that SC rituximab had a high risk of neutropenia and nausea.

CONCLUSION

For NHL patients, there is no significant difference in the efficacy between subcutaneous rituximab and conventional therapy, while subcutaneous injection can shorten exposure time in the hospital and reduce the risk of infection.

Rituximab pediatric drug development: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling to inform regulatory approval for rituximab treatment in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis or microscopic polyangiitis

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) are rare, potentially organ- and life-threatening autoimmune conditions affecting adult and pediatric patients. An open-label phase II study was conducted to determine safe and effective dosing regimens of rituximab in pediatric patients with GPA/MPA. To determine the selection of an appropriate dose regimen in children for induction and maintenance, a population pharmacokinetic approach was used (nonlinear mixed-effect modeling), combining pediatric data with data from adults with GPA/MPA. The time course of B-cell depletion was assessed in both populations. The exposure-effect relationship was assessed by logistic regression. Twenty-five pediatric patients (80% female patients; age range, 6-17 years) were enrolled in the trial and received the induction regimen of intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks, which resulted in a similar exposure to that of adults. Based on pharmacokinetic modeling, a maintenance dosing regimen of 250 mg/m² administered twice over 14 days followed by 250 mg/m² every 6 months is expected to result in similar rituximab exposure as that of adults receiving the approved maintenance dose of 500 mg administered twice over 14 days followed by 500 mg every 6 months. The time course of B-cell depletion was similar between the pediatric and adult populations, supporting the similarities in response in both populations and allowing extrapolation to patients less than 6 years old. Using a partial extrapolation approach helped identify safe and effective dosing regimens of rituximab in pediatric patients with GPA/MPA and lead to regulatory approval.

Subcutaneous rituximab in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma: Final results of the non-interventional study MabSCale

BACKGROUND

Rituximab has become a standard treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of rituximab in combination with standard chemotherapies in the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. This non-interventional study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous (SC) rituximab in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Adult patients with previously untreated CD20 positive DLBCL or FL who received rituximab SC and chemotherapy as first-line treatment were observed between 07/2014 and 07/2019 at 99 institutions in Germany. Primary endpoint was the (unconfirmed) complete remission (CR/CRu) rate. Primary outcome was analyzed inferentially; other variables were evaluated descriptively.

RESULTS

Overall 583 patients (247 FL; 336 DLBCL) were evaluated. CR/CRu rates were 51.4% (95% CI: 45.2; 57.6) in the FL set and 48.5% (95% CI: 43.2; 53.8) in the DLBCL set. Regarding progression-free survival in the FL group, the probability of being event-free was 94.2% in the first year and 86.2% in the second year. An overall response was achieved in 85.8% (FL) and 85.4% patients (DLBCL). Patient satisfaction at the end of study with the time saving simplification of the SC vs. intravenous route was 98% for FL and 97% for DLBCL. 45.3% of FL and 47.0% of DLBCL patients experienced an adverse event of grade ≥3. Serious adverse events of grade ≥3 occurred in 27.9% FL and 32.4% DLBCL patients, with the highest incidences for leucopenia, anemia, nausea, and fatigue. No new safety signals were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirmed the effectiveness and safety of rituximab SC in both the FL and the DLBCL group. Satisfaction of patients and nurses with SC administration was high.

Boas Práticas na Administração do Rituximab: Revisão Integrativa da Literatura

Introdução: O rituximab e um anticorpo monoclonal quimérico camundongo/humano, amplamente utilizado no cenário terapêutico de vários diagnósticos. Por apresentar diferentes protocolos de administração, manejo e efeitos adversos, seu uso requer atenção da equipe de saúde. Objetivo: Descrever os protocolos infusionais do rituximab na primeira infusão, nas subsequentes e na dessensibilização, e caracterizar a sua segurança. Método: Revisão integrativa da literatura. A busca pelos periódicos foi realizada nas bases de dados e bibliotecas eletrônicas: LILACS, PubMed, MEDLINE, SciELO e BDEnf. Resultados: O cruzamento dos descritores proporcionou a identificação de 413 artigos. Destes, 113 foram lidos na integra e, ao final, 16 artigos foram aplicáveis ao desenho do estudo. Os artigos foram publicados entre os anos de 2016 e 2020, com predomínio da língua inglesa (87,5%).  uanto as principais formas de administração do medicamento, nove estudos abordaram a infusão por via intravenosa (em variadas modalidades de tempo) e sete por via subcutânea. Conclusão: De acordo com a literatura cientifica, todas as modalidades de infusão intravenosa e subcutânea demostram ser seguras e eficazes se os protocolos forem adequadamente indicados e corretamente aplicados.

Monoclonal antibodies used for the management of haematological disorders

INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal antibodies Ab (MoAb) are increasingly becoming part of therapeutic armamentarium for haematologists and haemato-oncologists. This review brings together commonly used antibodies in one place for brevity and novel understanding.

AREAS COVERED

Pubmed and Scopus databases were explored focusing on MoAb in clinical haematological practice. Emphasis was given to current review articles. The data base was searched from 1997 till present. 24 different antibodies, most of which are in use were discussed. Antibodies are used for diverse conditions i.e. malignant and benign haematological conditions, treatment at various phases of stem cell transplantation. These antibodies were used both alone or in combination with various chemotherapy, targeted small molecules or as immunoconjugates. Some of the side effect profiles of these antibodies were common and some were unique. Unusual infections or organ dysfunctions were noted. Improved function of antibodies by protein engineering is also advancing rapidly. Dosage, frequency and route of administration depended on the convenience and condition for which the antibody is used.

EXPERT OPINION

: MoAbs are increasingly used in haematology practice either alone or in combination with other types of therapy for improved out come in various haematological conditions.

Assessing the transition from intravenous to subcutaneous delivery of rituximab: Benefits for payers, health care professionals, and patients with lymphoma

Subcutaneous (SC) administration of rituximab provides an opportunity for reduced patient treatment burden and increased healthcare efficiencies as an alternative to intravenous (IV) rituximab. There is minimal evidence comparing costs associated with SC and IV rituximab in a US setting. This research assessed the impact of transitioning patients from IV to SC rituximab for treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) from the US payer, provider, and patient perspective. We developed a model to estimate cost differences for transitioning 20% of a patient cohort from IV to SC rituximab. We included patients with incident diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, incident and recurrent follicular lymphoma, and incident and recurrent chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In the model, each patient received the same number of doses and that there was no difference in discontinuation between cohorts due to non-inferior efficacy and a similar safety profile. Model inputs were collected from published literature and publicly available data. Scenario analyses tested the impact of availability of low-cost biosimilars. In the base case (1,000,000 covered lives), we estimated a total of 157 patients, with 769 total drug administrations. A transition of 20% of patients from IV to SC was projected to generate $153,000 in payer savings, increase provider capacity by 270 hours, and free 470 hours of patient time. Scenario analyses suggest SC administration will be cost saving for payers even with a market where biosimilars approach 50% market share. A 20% transition to SC rituximab in a single cohort of patients has the potential to generate significant US health system value in the form of payer savings, increased practice capacity, and patient time.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses for Venetoclax in Combination with R-CHOP in Relapsed/Refractory and Previously Untreated Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Introduction

Outcomes remain poor in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who overexpress BCL-2 protein. We present population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) and exposure–response (ER) analyses for venetoclax (a selective BCL-2 inhibitor) administered with rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) and previously untreated (1L) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) from the phase 1b/2 CAVALLI study, to confirm dose selection for future studies.

Methods

Analyses included 216 patients with R/R or 1L NHL treated for eight 21-day cycles with 400–800 mg venetoclax (cycle 1: days 4–10; cycles 2–8: days 1–10) in combination with R for eight cycles and CHOP for 6–8 cycles. A legacy PopPK model for venetoclax was used to describe the observed data and provide post hoc PK parameters. Venetoclax steady-state exposure (AUC_ss) was used to predict clinical efficacy, safety, or tolerability. To isolate the effect of venetoclax, ER analyses referenced data from the R-CHOP arm of a historical control study, GOYA, in 1L DLBCL.

Results

There was no significant association between venetoclax AUC_ss and progression-free survival or complete response either for all-comers or the BCL-2-immunohistochemistry-positive subpopulation. No statistically significant trends were observed with venetoclax AUC_ss and the key grade ≥ 3 adverse events and serious adverse events. Similar dose intensities were observed for venetoclax and R-CHOP components across venetoclax exposures, suggesting venetoclax did not impact delivery of the R-CHOP backbone.

Conclusions

The PopPK and ER analyses, in addition to the positive benefit–risk observed in the clinical data, support the selection of 800 mg venetoclax given with R-CHOP for future studies in BCL-2-immunohistochemistry-positive patients with 1L DLBCL.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02055820.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01919-z.

A case of polymorphic dermal angiitis in a B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient during rituximab therapy

The aim of the study is to describe a case is of clinical interest as the first known occurrence of skin vasculitis during rituximab treatment. The article describes a case of polymorphic dermal angiitis, a combination of hemorrhagic and ulcerative-necrotic forms against the background of rituximab treatment in a 53-year-old woman suffering from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (b-CLL). During four hours after the 5th intravenous administration of rituximab, the appearance of painful rashes on the skin of both shins of a patient was observed. In the following few days, a progression of the pathological skin process was noted. The treatment with prednisolone in the amount of 50 mg/day, amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in the amount of 1000 mg twice per day and Diflucan in a dosage of 50 mg/day for 15 days was prescribed. In a local therapy, wet-drying bandages with antiseptic solutions, combined topic glucocorticosteroid preparations, drugs that improve trophic and tissue regeneration were recommended. After discharge, the patient continued to receive prednisolone in the amount of 50 mg/day for 14 days with a slow decrease in the dosage of the drug until the withdrawal under the supervision of a dermatologist. The described experience of how combined forms of polymorphic dermal angiitis are developing can be considered a result of toxic drug response to rituximab.

Subcutaneous Administration: Evolution, Challenges, and the Role of Hyaluronidase

BACKGROUND

The subcutaneous (SC) route has evolved significantly. More than two dozen chemotherapy and supportive therapies have been approved for use in the oncology setting. Several IV therapies have been approved for the SC route and require a significantly higher volume than historical maximum limits. Differences exist in how these drugs are administered as compared to older chemotherapy agents.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this article is to provide a brief history of the SC route and describe its role in cancer treatment. The use of recombinant hyaluronidase is reviewed within the context of SC monoclonal antibodies. Proper administration techniques and interventions for reducing patient discomfort are discussed.

METHODS

Sentinel medical texts, pharmacokinetic studies, manufacturer's recommendations, and peer-reviewed articles were examined.

FINDINGS

The SC route offers several advantages over the oral and IV routes. A clear understanding of anatomical site selection and injection techniques is beneficial for providing requisite patient education.

Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses of intravenous and subcutaneous rituximab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

A subcutaneous formulation of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has been developed. Fixed-dose subcutaneous rituximab delivers noninferior serum trough concentrations (C_trough ), ensuring similar target saturation and comparable efficacy/safety, to intravenous rituximab, but with simplified and shortened preparation and administration. We aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response properties of subcutaneous rituximab. Data from two clinical trials were analyzed to describe PKs and pharmacodynamics in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia following intravenous and subcutaneous rituximab administration. Intravenous and subcutaneous rituximab were described by a linear two-compartment population PK model with time-dependent and time-independent clearances, and first-order subcutaneous absorption. Main covariates influencing exposure were body size and baseline white blood cell count. Occurrence of adverse events was not correlated with rituximab exposure. Although greater and more sustainable B-cell depletion was observed with higher exposure, inherent limitations to the data (use of one dose level, and time-dependent and target-impacted PKs) prevented reliable assessment of exposure-response relationships.

Biologics in autoimmune bullous diseases: Current scenario

Autoimmune bullous diseases can be intraepidermal (pemphigus group of disorders) or subepidermal (pemphigoid group of disorders). The treatment of these disorders chiefly comprises corticosteroids and immunosuppressant adjuvants like azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil. Autoantibodies are the main mediators of these diseases. Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody targeting B-cells, has emerged as an excellent treatment option for refractory pemphigus vulgaris in the last decade. Since then, many new biologics have been proposed/explored for managing autoimmune bullous diseases. These hold potential for greater efficacy and lesser adverse effects than conventional immunosuppressants. In this review, we discuss the role of various biologics in the treatment of autoimmune bullous diseases, followed by a brief discussion on the drawbacks to their use and new developments in this area.

Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous CT-P13 in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized phase I/III trial

Objective

To assess non-inferiority of s.c. to i.v. CT-P13 in RA.

Methods

Patients with active RA and inadequate response to MTX participated in this phase I/III double-blind study at 76 sites. Patients received CT-P13 i.v. 3 mg/kg [week (W) 0 and W2] before randomization (1:1) at W6 to CT-P13 s.c. via pre-filled syringe (PFS) 120 mg biweekly until W28, or CT-P13 i.v. 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks until W22. Randomization was stratified by country, W2 serum CRP and W6 body weight. From W30, all patients received CT-P13 s.c. In a usability sub-study, patients received CT-P13 s.c. via auto-injector (W46–54) then PFS (W56–64). The primary endpoint was change (decrease) from baseline in disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28)-CRP at W22 (non-inferiority margin: −0.6).

Results

Of 357 patients enrolled, 343 were randomized to CT-P13 s.c. (n = 167) or CT-P13 i.v. (n = 176) at W6. The least-squares mean change (decrease) from baseline (standard error) in DAS28-CRP at W22 was 2.21 (0.22) for CT-P13 s.c. (n = 162) and 1.94 (0.21) for CT-P13 i.v. [n = 168; difference 0.27 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.52)], establishing non-inferiority. Efficacy findings were similar between arms at W54. Safety was similar between arms throughout: 92 (54.8%; CT-P13 s.c.) and 117 (66.9%; CT-P13 i.v.) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (from W6). There were no treatment-related deaths or new safety findings. Usability was similar for CT-P13 s.c. via auto-injector or PFS.

Conclusion

CT-P13 s.c. was non-inferior to CT-P13 i.v. in active RA. The convenience of s.c. administration could benefit patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03147248.

Efficacy and safety assessment of prolonged maintenance with subcutaneous rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results of the Phase III MabCute study

Rituximab plus chemotherapy induction followed by rituximab maintenance for up to 2 years confers a long-term benefit in terms of progression-free survival in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is not known whether further prolonged maintenance with rituximab provides additional benefit. The phase III MabCute study enrolled 692 patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients who responded to induction with rituximab plus chemotherapy and were still responding after up to 2 years’ initial maintenance with subcutaneous rituximab were randomized to extended maintenance with subcutaneous rituximab (n=138) or observation only (n=138). The primary endpoint of investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the randomized population was un-addressed by the end of study because of an insufficient number of events (129 events were needed for 80% power at 5% significance if approximately 330 patients were randomized). In total, there were 46 progression-free survival events, 19 and 27 in the rituximab and observation arms, respectively (P=0.410 by stratified log-rank test; hazard ratio 0.76 [95% confidence interval: 0.37– 1.53]). The median progression-free survival was not reached in either randomized arm. There were no new safety signals; however, adverse events were seen slightly more frequently with rituximab than with observation during extended maintenance. Maintenance for up to 2 years with rituximab after response to initial induction therefore remains the standard of care in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non- Hodgkin lymphoma. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01461928)

Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology Supports the Bridging from i.v. Dosing and Approval of s.c. Rituximab in B-Cell Hematological Malignancies

A fixed-dose subcutaneous (s.c.) formulation of the anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, has been developed to address safety, infusion time, and patient comfort concerns relating to intravenous (i.v.) dosing, and has been approved based upon a pharmacokinetic (PK)-clinical bridging strategy, which demonstrated noninferiority of s.c. vs. i.v. dosing in malignancies, including follicular lymphoma (FL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). A clinical development plan was undertaken to identify rituximab s.c. doses achieving noninferior exposure to rituximab i.v., and to confirm PK-clinical bridging, with the same efficacy and similar safety. This drew upon data from 1,579 patients with FL, CLL, or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in 5 clinical studies, and showed minimum steady-state serum concentration (C_trough ) as the most appropriate exposure bridging measure. Population PK models were developed, simulations were run using covariates and PK parameters from clinical studies, and exposure-efficacy and -safety analyses performed. Population PKs showed a two-compartment model with time-dependent and -independent clearances. Clearance and volume were predominantly influenced by body surface area; disposition and elimination were similar for the s.c. and i.v. formulations. After s.c. administration, patients with FL and CLL achieved noninferior exposures to i.v. dosing. Overall, rituximab exposure and route of administration did not influence clinical responses in patients with FL or CLL, and there was no association between exposure and safety events. C_trough was shown to be an effective pharmacologic-clinical bridging parameter for rituximab in patients with FL or CLL. Clinically effective exposures are achieved with either s.c. or i.v. dosing.

Antibody Therapies for Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) constitute a subgroup of aggressive but highly curable lymphoproliferative diseases. Treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients still represents an unmet clinical need, and novel drugs and combinations are in continuous development. The pan–B cell panel of surface antigens that characterizes LBCL leads to a large umbrella of druggable targets. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) express their activity against lymphoma by targeting multiple tumor-specific antigens. This category consists of a number of molecules with different mechanisms of action, including naked mAbs, radioimmunoconjugates, antibody-drug conjugates, checkpoint inhibitors, and bispecific antibodies. In the last decade, apart from the well-known role of the anti-CD20 mAb rituximab, novel mAbs have led to remarkable steps forward in the treatment of R/R LBCL in monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy. Multiple studies are in development trying to bring these novel compounds into the frontline setting to empower the RCHOP effect or as alternative chemotherapy-free options for elderly/unfit patients. This review provides insight into antilymphoma mAbs, focused on the efficacy and safety of the main molecules approved or in development for LBCL andperspectives on the treatment of this disease.

Impact of the subcutaneous formulations of trastuzumab and rituximab on efficiency and resource optimization in Spanish hospitals: H-Excelencia study

Background

Subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) administration is advantageous in terms of patient convenience and hospital efficiency. This study aimed to compare the effect of optimizing the processes involved in SC versus IV administration of rituximab and trastuzumab on hospital capacity and service quality.

Methods

This cross-sectional resource utilization study interviewed oncologists, hematologists, nurses, and pharmacists from 10 hospitals in Spain to estimate changes in processes associated with conversion from IV to SC rituximab and trastuzumab, based on clinical experience and healthcare use from administrative databases.

Results

Efficient use of SC formulations increased the monthly capacity for parenteral administration by 3.35% (potentially increasable by 5.75% with maximum possible conversion according to the product label). The weekly capacity for hospital pharmacy treatment preparation increased by 7.13% due to conversion to SC formulation and by 9.33% due to transferring SC preparation to the cancer treatment unit (potentially increasable by 12.16 and 14.10%, respectively). Monthly hospital time decreased by 33% with trastuzumab and 47% with rituximab. In a hypothetical hospital, in which all processes for efficient use of SC rituximab and/or trastuzumab were implemented and all eligible patients received SC formulations, the estimated monthly capacity for preparation and administration increased by 23.1% and estimated hospital times were reduced by 60–66%.

Conclusions

Conversion of trastuzumab and rituximab to SC administration could improve the efficiency of hospitals and optimize internal resource management processes, potentially increasing care capacity and improving the quality of care by reducing time spent by patients at hospitals.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06277-8.

Subcutaneous Rituximab-MiniCHOP Compared With Subcutaneous Rituximab-MiniCHOP Plus Lenalidomide in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma for Patients Age 80 Years or Older

PURPOSE

The prognosis of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is worse than that of young patients. An attenuated dose of chemotherapy-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab (R-miniCHOP)-is a good compromise between efficacy and safety in very elderly patients. In combination with R-CHOP (R2-CHOP), lenalidomide has an acceptable level of toxicity and may mitigate the negative prognosis of the non-germinal center B-cell-like phenotype. The Lymphoma Study association conducted a multicentric, phase III, open-label, randomized trial to compare R-miniCHOP and R2-miniCHOP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients of age 80 years or older with untreated DLBCL were randomly assigned into the R-miniCHOP21 group or the R2-miniCHOP21 group for six cycles and stratified according to CD10 expression and age. The first cycle of rituximab was delivered by IV on D1 after a prephase and then delivered subcutaneously on D1 of cycles 2-6. Lenalidomide was delivered at a dose of 10 mg once daily on D1-D14 of each cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients with new DLBCL were randomly assigned (127 R-miniCHOP and 122 R2-miniCHOP). The median age was 83 years (range, 80-96), and 55% of the patients were classified as non-GCB. The delivered dose for each R-miniCHOP compound was similar in both arms. Over a median follow-up of 25.1 months, the intention-to-treat analysis revealed that R2-miniCHOP did not improve OS (2-year OS 66% in R-miniCHOP and 65.7% in R2-miniCHOP arm, P = .98) in the overall population or in the non-GCB population. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 53% of patients with R-miniCHOP and in 81% of patients with R2-miniCHOP.

CONCLUSION

The addition of lenalidomide to R-miniCHOP does not improve OS. Rituximab delivered subcutaneously was safe in this population.

Monoclonal Antibodies, Bispecific Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Oncohematology

Background:

The therapeutic outcomes and the prognosis of patients with various hematologic malignancies are not always ideal with the current standard of care.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to analyze the results of the use of monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates for the therapy of malignant hemopathies.

Methods:

A mini-review was achieved using the articles published in Web of Science and PubMed between January 2017 and January 2020 and the new patents were made in this field.

Results:

Naked monoclonal antibodies have improved the therapeutic results obtained with standard of care, but they also have side effects and the use of some of them can lead to the loss of the target antigen through trogocytosis, which explains the resistance that occurs during therapy. The results obtained with naked monoclonal antibodies have been improved by a better monoclonal antibody preparation, the use of bispecific antibodies (against two antigens on the target cell surface or by binding both surface antigen on target cells and T-cell receptor complex, followed by cytotoxic T-lymphocytes activation and subsequent cytolysis of the target cell), the use of monoclonal or bispecific constructs in frontline regimens, combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy, including through the use of antibody-drug conjugates (which provides a targeted release of a chemotherapeutic agent).

Conclusion:

Immunotherapy and immuno-chemotherapy have improved the outcome of the patients with malignant hemopathies through a targeted, personalized therapy, with reduced systemic toxicity, which in some cases can even induce deep complete remissions, including minimal residual disease negativity.

Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies for HIV Prevention

In the last decade, over a dozen potent broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) to several HIV envelope protein epitopes have been identified, and their in vitro neutralization profiles have been defined. Many have demonstrated prevention efficacy in preclinical trials and favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in early human clinical trials. The first human prevention efficacy trials using 10 sequential, every-two-month administrations of a single anti-HIV bnAb are anticipated to conclude in 2020. Combinations of complementary bnAbs and multi-specific bnAbs exhibit improved breadth and potency over most individual antibodies and are entering advanced clinical development. Genetic engineering of the Fc regions has markedly improved bnAb half-life, increased mucosal tissue concentrations of antibodies (especially in the genital tract), and enhanced immunomodulatory and Fc effector functionality, all of which improve antibodies' preventative and therapeutic potential. Human-derived monoclonal antibodies are likely to enter the realm of primary care prevention and therapy for viral infections in the near future.

Anti-CD20 treatment for B-cell malignancies: current status and future directions

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy with rituximab in the 1990s greatly improved outcomes for patients with B-cell malignancies. Disease resistance or relapse after successful initial therapy and declining efficacy of subsequent rounds of treatment were the basis for the development of alternative anti-CD20-based antibody therapies.

AREAS COVERED

The novel anti-CD20 antibodies of atumumab, ublituximab, and obinutuzumab were developed to be differentiated via structural and mechanistic features over rituximab. We provide an overview of preclinical and clinical data, and demonstrate ways in which the pharmacodynamic properties of these novel agents translate into clinical benefit for patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Of the novel anti-CD20 antibodies, only obinutuzumab has shown consistently improved efficacy over rituximab in randomized pivotal trials in indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The Phase 3 GALLIUM trial demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival with obinutuzumab-based immunochemotherapy over rituximab-based immunochemotherapy. Novel combinations of obinutuzumab, including with chemotherapy-free options are being explored, such as with the newly approved combinations of obinutuzumab with venetoclax, ibrutinib, or acalabrutinib. The biggest unmet need remains in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; emerging options in this field include the use of CAR-T cells and T-cell bispecific antibodies.

Effectiveness and Safety of Subcutaneous Rituximab for Patients With Gastric MALT Lymphoma: A Case-Control Comparison With Intravenous Rituximab

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab is a standard treatment for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (GML). We sought to compare the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous and intravenous rituximab in a retrospective case-control study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients with GML treated with subcutaneous rituximab between January 2017 and December 2018 were included and compared to 3 matched control patients (based on Ann Arbor classification, presence of t(11;18) translocation, history of treatment, and type of current treatment) treated with intravenous rituximab between January 2000 and December 2018. Patients with t(11;18) translocation were treated with rituximab in combination with chlorambucil; the other patients were treated with rituximab alone. Effectiveness was assessed at week 52, and safety was assessed through weeks 0 to 52 and compared by the chi-square test.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included in the subcutaneous rituximab group and 75 in the intravenous group. There was no difference between the groups in complete remission (78% vs. 76%, P = .99) or overall response rates (91% vs. 89%, P = .99) at week 52. Safety profiles were similar in both groups, with a significant decrease in postinduction grade 2 injection-related reactions and outpatient hospital length of stay in the subcutaneous rituximab group.

CONCLUSION

In a small case-control study, we did not find any difference in the effectiveness or safety profiles between subcutaneously and intravenously delivered rituximab for the treatment of patients with GML. We found a decrease in postinduction grade 2 injection-related reactions and outpatient hospital length of stay in the subcutaneous rituximab group.

Comparison of Access to Novel Drugs for Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Between India and the United States

This review will compare and contrast the costs and access to novel drugs for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and lymphoma in the United States and India during the last 5 years. Clinical outcomes for patients with hematologic malignancies have improved significantly since the approval of immunotherapeutic and targeted therapies. These new treatments have had an impact on overall outcomes and have helped determine the design for translational research and future trials. Although most of these novel drugs called “innovators” are initially approved and marketed in the United States, several have also become available in countries such as India. With the expiration of patents, generic versions of innovator drugs have increased and accessibility has improved for patients. The advent of biosimilars is another route for expanding access to biologic compounds. As a result, the development costs for developing these drugs are lower, and consequently, the costs for the patient are often lower. Although the delivery of cancer care is not the same in India as it is in the United States, the introduction of biosimilars and generics has helped bridge the gap. This has made treatment of CLL and lymphoma similar in both countries and has had the same impact on patient outcomes and quality of life. Compulsory licensing for essential medications, as stipulated by the Doha Declaration, and capping of drug prices could improve global access to treatments for CLL and lymphoma.

The Influence of Different Disease States on Rituximab Pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, which promotes the selective depletion of CD20 positive B cells, was the first targeted therapy that was approved for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, and it is now widely prescribed in both malignant and non-malignant, immune-related diseases. However, the cause of its various clinical responses in certain diseases, have not been clearly elucidated. The variabilities in inter-individual pharmacokinetic and the emerging evidence of the relationships between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic may provide a better understanding of this drug.

METHODS

We searched and summarized the latest published articles on rituximab pharmacokinetic profiles and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models in different patient populations, including B-cell malignancies, rheumatoid arthritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, and glomerular kidney diseases.

RESULTS

Most pharmacokinetic data are drawn from clinical studies in oncology clinical practice. Body weight, gender, and antigen-related factors are proven to be the key factors affecting rituximab pharmacokinetics. In addition, the positive exposure-response relations were reported, which provide encouraging evidence for individualized therapies. While in immune disorders, especially in the off-labeled indications, pharmacokinetic studies are quite limited. Compared with that in B-cell malignancies, the differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters may be attributed to the different pathogeneses of diseases, mechanisms of action and dosing strategies. However, the correlation between drug exposure and clinical outcomes remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

Here, we provide an overview of the complexities associated with rituximab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in different diseases. Although many influencing factors need to be verified in future studies, a better understanding of the relationships between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic may assist in optimizing rituximab clinical practice.

Subcutaneous Antibiotic Therapy: The Why, How, Which Drugs and When

OBJECTIVES

To describe the rationale for subcutaneous (SC) administration of antibiotics from available published data and to make propositions to help clinicians in daily practice.

DESIGN

Narrative review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Hospitalized patients, persons in long-term care facilities and ambulatory care.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed electronic database for evidence supporting SC administration of antibiotics up to September 2019; the results of this primary search were supplemented by searching the references of the identified articles, as well as by searching in Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Regarding tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles, most studies suggest that the SC route could be an alternative to the intravenous route, particularly for time-dependent antibiotics and among certain patient populations, such as patients with poor venous access, swallowing disorders, or behavioral disturbance. However, clinical evidence of the benefits and risks of SC antibiotic administration is still scarce and of low level.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

SC administration of antibiotics may be useful in various settings such as in hospitalized patients and among those in long-term care facilities or being cared for at home. However, further clinical studies are needed to assess the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, as well as the risks and benefits of SC administration of antibiotics. In this review, we highlight the potential benefits of SC administration of antibiotics and address practical recommendations for its use. This information will enable improvement of treatment strategies and present the SC route as a potential option in specific situations.

The effect of rituximab on encapsulated peritoneal sclerosis in an experimental rat model

Background/aim

 Peritoneal sclerosis may be observed in varied manifestations. However, the most serious form is the encapsulated peritoneal sclerosis. We researched the effect of rituximab on peritoneal fibrosis in an experimental rat model.

Materials and methods

Twenty-four Wistar Albino rats were divided into 4 equal groups. During weeks 0–3; group I received isotonic saline (IS) solution, group II, group III, and group IV received chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) via intraperitoneal (i.p.) route. In the next 3 weeks nothing adminestred to both group I and group II but IS solution was adminestred to group III via i.p. route and 375 mg/m2/week rituximab was applied intravenously on days 21, 28, and 35 to group IV. Fibrosis, peritoneal thickness, and inflammation were evaluated. Immunohistochemical methods used for the detection of matrix MMP-2, TGF-β1, and VGEF expressions.

Results

  The rituximab (group IV) had significantly lower fibrosis and peritoneal thickness scores than the group II and III (P < 0.001). TGF-β1 and VEGF expressions were significantly lower in the rituximab group than in the group II and III (P < 0.001).Conclusion: We found that rituximab had a significant effect on the peritoneal thickness, total fibrosis, TGF-β1 and VGEF scores which were induced by CG.

Hyaluronidase Coated Molecular Envelope Technology Nanoparticles Enhance Drug Absorption via the Subcutaneous Route

Parenteral chemotherapy is usually administered intravenously, although patient preference and health economics suggest the subcutaneous (sc) route could be an attractive alternative. However, due to the low aqueous solubility of hydrophobic drugs and injection volume limitations, the total amount of drug that can be administered in a single sc injection is frequently insufficient. We have developed hyaluronidase coated nanoparticles (NPs) that efficiently encapsulate such drugs, thus addressing both issues and allowing sufficient amounts of hydrophobic drug to be administered and absorbed effectively. CUDC-101, a poorly water-soluble multitargeted anticancer drug that simultaneously inhibits the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) EGFR and HER2, as well as histone deacetylase (HDAC), was encapsulated in polymeric Molecular Envelope Technology (MET) NPs. The role of polymer chemistry, formulation parameters, and coating with hyaluronidase (HYD) on MET-CUDC-101 NP formulations was examined and optimized to yield high drug loading and colloidal stability, and, after freeze-drying, stable storage at room temperature for up to 90 days. The pharmacokinetic studies in healthy rats showed that plasma AUC_0-24h after sc administration correlates tightly with formulation physical chemistry, specifically in vitro colloidal stability. Compared to uncoated NPs, the HYD-coating doubled the drug plasma exposure. In a murine A431 xenograft model, the coated HYD-MET-CUDC-101 NPs at a dose equivalent to 90 mg kg^-1 CUDC-101 increased the survival time from 15 days (control animals treated with hyaluronidase alone) to 43 days. Polymer MET nanoparticles coated with hyaluronidase enabled the subcutaneous delivery of a hydrophobic drug with favorable therapeutic outcomes.

Australian and New Zealand consensus statement on the management of lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and myeloma during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic poses a unique challenge to the care of patients with haematological malignancies. Viral pneumonia is known to cause disproportionately severe disease in patients with cancer, and patients with lymphoma, myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia are likely to be at particular risk of severe disease related to COVID-19. This statement has been developed by consensus among authors from Australia and New Zealand. We aim to provide supportive guidance to clinicians making individual patient decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular during periods that access to healthcare resources may be limited. General recommendations include those to minimise patient exposure to COVID-19, including the use of telehealth, avoidance of non-essential visits and minimisation of time spent by patients in infusion suites and other clinical areas. This statement also provides recommendations where appropriate in assessing indications for therapy, reducing therapy-associated immunosuppression and reducing healthcare utilisation in patients with specific haematological malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specific decisions regarding therapy of haematological malignancies will need to be individualised, based on disease risk, risks of immunosuppression, rates of community transmission of COVID-19 and available local healthcare resources.

Real-world costs of illness of Hodgkin and the main B-Cell Non-Hodgkin lymphomas in France

Background: Lymphomas are costly diseases that suffer from a lack of detailed economic information, notably in a real-world setting. Decision-makers are increasing the search for Real-World Evidence (RWE) to assess the impact, in real-life, of healthcare management and to support their public decisions. Thus, we aimed to assess the real-world net costs of the active treatment phases of adult Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), Follicular Lymphoma (FL) and Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using population-based data from a national representative sample of the French population covered by the health insurance system. Cost analysis was performed from the French health insurance perspective and took into account direct and sick leave compensation costs (€2,018). Healthcare costs were studied over the active treatment phase. We used multivariate modeling to adjust cost differences between lymphoma subtypes.Results: Analyses were performed on 224 lymphoma patients and 896 controls. The mean additional monthly costs due to HL, FL and DLBCL patients were respectively €5,188, €3,242 and €7,659 for the active treatment phase. The main additional cost driver was principally inpatient stay (hospitalization costs and costly cancer-related drugs), followed by outpatient medication and productivity loss. When adjusted, DLBCL remains significantly the most costly lymphoma subtype.Conclusion: This study provides an accurate assessment of the main lymphoma subtypes related cost with high magnitude of details in a real-world setting. We underline where potential cost saving could be realized via the use of biosimilar medication, and where lymphoma management could be improved with the early management of adverse events.KEY POINTSThis is one of the first studies which assess the additional cost of lymphoma in Europe, according the main sub-types of lymphoma and with real-world database.The additional monthly cost due to HL, FL and DLBCL patients were respectively €5,188, €3,242 and €7,659 for the active treatment phase and the main additional cost driver was principally inpatient stay (i.e. hospitalization costs and additional inpatient medicines, notably rituximab), followed by outpatient medication and productivity loss.This study provides an accurate and detailed lymphoma subtype cost description and comparison which supply data for efficiency evaluations and will allow French health policy to improve lymphoma management.

Safety of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous rituximab during first-line treatment of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Spanish population of the MabRella study

Rituximab is a standard treatment for non‐Hodgkin diffuse large B‐cell (DLBCL) and follicular (FL) lymphomas. A subcutaneous formulation was developed to improve the resource use of intravenous rituximab, with comparable efficacy and safety profiles except for increased administration‐related reactions (ARRs). MabRella was a phase IIIb trial to assess the safety of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous administration of rituximab during first‐line induction/maintenance for DLBCL or FL, focusing on ARRs. Efficacy, satisfaction and quality of life were also assessed. Patients received subcutaneous rituximab plus standard induction chemotherapy for DLBCL or FL for 4–7 cycles, and/or every 2 months maintenance monotherapy for FL for 6–12 cycles. The study included 140 patients: DLBCL, n = 29; FL, n = 111. Ninety‐five percent of patients experienced adverse events, reaching grade ≥3 in 38·6% and were serious in 30·0%. AARs occurred in 48·6%, mostly (84·9%) at the injection site, with only 2·1% of patients reaching grade 3. The end‐of‐induction complete/unconfirmed complete response rate was 69·6%. After a median follow‐up of 33·5 months, median disease‐/event‐/progression‐free and overall survivals were not attained. The Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire showed improvements in overall satisfaction and the EuroQoL‐5D a good quality‐of‐life perception at induction/maintenance end. Therefore, switching to subcutaneous rituximab showed no new safety issues and maintained efficacy with improved satisfaction and quality of life.

Humanistic and economic impact of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of oncology biologics

More oncology biologics are becoming available for subcutaneous (sc.) administration and are expected to provide useful therapeutic options. We evaluated evidence published in the past 5 years to assess the humanistic and economic impact of sc. versus intravenous administration of approved cancer therapies and identify outcomes favoring either administration route. These publications focused predominantly on healthcare resource utilization and economic outcomes, demonstrating resource and cost savings with sc. administration. Patients reported a better health-related quality of life and preference for sc. formulations. Time-and-motion study analyses confirmed the convenience of sc. administration. These findings suggest that future availability of sc. oncology biologics, especially anti-PD-1/PD-ligand 1 antibodies due to their increased utility in various malignancies, may be beneficial for patients, healthcare providers and payers.

Practical considerations for the integration of subcutaneous targeted therapies into the oncology clinic

The oncology clinic is changing, with an increasing number of cancer therapies becoming available as formulations for subcutaneous (SC) injection. Using targeted therapies, such as alemtuzumab, bortezomib, rituximab or trastuzumab, via SC injection can be advantageous for patients, healthcare professionals, and healthcare systems. However, their use can also present challenges, and nurses have a unique opportunity to positively influence the integration of SC agents in the clinic. This article summarizes practical suggestions for optimal administration of SC targeted therapies, and provides pragmatic considerations for managing the change process related to their adoption.

Rituximab dosing in hematological malignancies: an old question, revisited

Rituximab is the standard of care for most B-cell malignancies. Its rapid clinical development enabled patients to receive this life-prolonging medicine sooner; however, it precluded a thorough assessment of dose selection. Extensive clinical pharmacology data collected from the recent subcutaneous development program enabled re-examination of this old question and support that the approved rituximab dosing regimens in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia appear to maximize the clinical benefit in the majority of patients.

How the discovery of rituximab impacted the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is the sixth-most common cancer in the UK, accounting for around 13,700 new cases every year. Until the late 1990s, treatment relied on intensive chemotherapy, such as CHOP (cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin HCl-vincristine [Oncovin]-prednisone). The use of standard CHOP therapy and its variations had resulted in poor five-year survival rates (as low as 26%), particularly in patients with aggressive NHL. Rituximab (Rituxan) was the first chimeric (mouse/human) monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of NHL. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1997 for indolent forms of NHL. It subsequently received EU approval in June 1998, and was licensed under the trade name Mabthera (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). It then went on to be approved for the first-line treatment of aggressive forms of NHL, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (to be used in combination with CHOP or other anthracycline-based chemotherapy) in 2006. It is directed against the CD20 protein, an antigen found on the surface of B-cell lymphomas. With minimal toxicity, activity as a single-agent (for indolent forms of NHL) and safety when combined with chemotherapy (for aggressive forms), it represents great progress in this field. Here, we analyze how this antibody therapeutic was developed from basic molecular and cellular considerations through to preclinical and clinical evaluations and how it came to be a first-line treatment for NHL, and we discuss the impacts the advent of rituximab had on treatment outcomes for patients with DLBCL compared with the pre-rituximab era.

B-cell depleting immunotherapies: therapeutic opportunities and toxicities

INTRODUCTION

The last few years have witnessed what can certainly be defined as a 'period of renaissance' for immunotherapy in the field of hematological malignancies. In particular, antibody-mediated and cell-mediated immunotherapy have significantly changed the treatment approach of patients with B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. These therapies, initially employed in patients with refractory/relapsed disease, are now integrated in the treatment of newly diagnosed patients. Together with the therapeutic success, we have also learnt that these innovative therapies can induce relevant, sometimes life-threatening or even fatal, side effects. Areas covered: In this review article, we analyzed the applicative therapeutic scenario and the peculiar toxicities associated with approaches of immunotherapy, paying particular attention to the new emerging side effects, substantially unknown before the introduction of these therapies. Expert commentary: Both monoclonal antibodies and cell therapy with lymphocytes genetically modified to be redirected against leukemia targets through the transduction with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have obtained unprecedented success in rescuing patients with resistant B-cell malignancies. Complications, such as neurotoxicity, cytokine release syndrome or persistent B-cell lymphopenia, must always be taken into consideration and diagnosed in a timely manner in patients with B-cell neoplasms to guarantee optimal management, thus avoiding they blunting the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Preemptive rituximab prevents long-term relapses in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Preemptive rituximab infusions prevent relapses in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) by maintaining normal ADAMTS13 activity. However, the long-term outcome of these patients and the potential adverse events of this strategy need to be determined. We report the long-term outcome of 92 patients with iTTP in clinical remission who received preemptive rituximab after identification of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (activity <10%) during the follow-up. Thirty-seven patients had >1 iTTP episode, and the median cumulative relapse incidence before preemptive rituximab was 0.33 episode per year (interquartile range [IQR], 0.23-0.66). After preemptive rituximab, the median cumulative relapse incidence in the whole population decreased to 0 episodes per year (IQR, 0-1.32; P < .001). After preemptive rituximab, ADAMTS13 activity recovery was sustained in 34 patients (37%) during a follow-up of 31.5 months (IQR, 18-65), and severe ADAMTS13 deficiency recurred in 45 patients (49%) after the initial improvement. ADAMTS13 activity usually improved with additional courses of preemptive rituximab. In 13 patients (14%), ADAMTS13 activity remained undetectable after the first rituximab course, but retreatment was efficient in 6 of 10 cases. In total, 14 patients (15%) clinically relapsed, and 19 patients (20.7%) experienced benign adverse effects. Preemptive rituximab treatment was associated with a change in ADAMTS13 conformation in respondent patients. Finally, in the group of 23 historical patients with iTTP and persistently undetectable ADAMTS13 activity, 74% clinically relapsed after a 7-year follow-up (IQR, 5-11). In conclusion, persistently undetectable ADAMTS13 activity in iTTP during remission is associated with a higher relapse rate. Preemptive rituximab reduces clinical relapses by maintaining a detectable ADAMTS13 activity with an advantageous risk-benefit balance.

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies: reviewing a revolution

Since the inception of rituximab in the 1990s, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have revolutionised the treatment of B cell hematological malignancies and have become a cornerstone of modern gold-standard practice. Additionally, the potent efficacy of these agents in depleting the B cell compartment has been used in the management of a broad array of autoimmune diseases. Multiple iterations of these agents have been investigated and are routinely used in clinical practice. In this review, we will discuss the physiology of CD20 and its attractiveness as a therapeutic target, as well as the pharmacology, pre-clinical and clinical data for the major anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies: rituximab, obinutuzumab and ofatumumab.

Past, Present, and Future of Rituximab-The World's First Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Therapy

Rituximab is a chimeric mouse/human monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy with binding specificity to CD20. It was the first therapeutic antibody approved for oncology patients and was the top-selling oncology drug for nearly a decade with sales reaching $8.58 billion in 2016. Since its initial approval in 1997, it has improved outcomes in all B-cell malignancies, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Despite widespread use, most mechanistic data have been gathered from in vitro studies while the roles of the various response mechanisms in humans are still largely undetermined. Polymorphisms in Fc gamma receptor and complement protein genes have been implicated as potential predictors of differential response to rituximab, but have not yet shown sufficient influence to impact clinical decisions. Unlike most targeted therapies developed today, no known biomarkers to indicate target engagement/tumor response have been identified, aside from reduced tumor burden. The lack of companion biomarkers beyond CD20 itself has made it difficult to predict which patients will respond to any given anti-CD20 antibody. In the past decade, two new anti-CD20 antibodies have been approved: ofatumumab, which binds a distinct epitope of CD20, and obinutuzumab, a mAb derived from rituximab with modifications to the Fc portion and to its glycosylation. Both are fully humanized and have biological activity that is distinct from that of rituximab. In addition to these new anti-CD20 antibodies, another imminent change in targeted lymphoma treatment is the multitude of biosimilars that are becoming available as rituximab's patent expires. While the widespread use of rituximab itself will likely continue, its biosimilars will increase global access to the therapy. This review discusses current research into mechanisms and potential biomarkers of rituximab response, as well as its biosimilars and the newer CD20 binding mAb therapies. Increased ability to assess the effectiveness of rituximab in an individual patient, along with the availability of alternative anti-CD20 antibodies will likely lead to dramatic changes in how we use CD20 antibodies going forward.

Rituximab in B-Cell Hematologic Malignancies: A Review of 20 Years of Clinical Experience

Rituximab is a human/murine, chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with established efficacy, and a favorable and well-defined safety profile in patients with various CD20-expressing lymphoid malignancies, including indolent and aggressive forms of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Since its first approval 20 years ago, intravenously administered rituximab has revolutionized the treatment of B-cell malignancies and has become a standard component of care for follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and mantle cell lymphoma. For all of these diseases, clinical trials have demonstrated that rituximab not only prolongs the time to disease progression but also extends overall survival. Efficacy benefits have also been shown in patients with marginal zone lymphoma and in more aggressive diseases such as Burkitt lymphoma. Although the proven clinical efficacy and success of rituximab has led to the development of other anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in recent years (e.g., obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, veltuzumab, and ocrelizumab), rituximab is likely to maintain a position within the therapeutic armamentarium because it is well established with a long history of successful clinical use. Furthermore, a subcutaneous formulation of the drug has been approved both in the EU and in the USA for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Using the wealth of data published on rituximab during the last two decades, we review the preclinical development of rituximab and the clinical experience gained in the treatment of hematologic B-cell malignancies, with a focus on the well-established intravenous route of administration. This article is a companion paper to A. Davies, et al., which is also published in this issue.

FUNDING

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.