Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis; A systematic review and meta-analysis

Multimodality imaging in cardiac sarcoidosis: A case series of diverse phenotypes

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) represents a rare yet potentially life-threatening condition characterized by non-specific clinical symptoms that maybe easily missed by clinicians. In this case series, the clinical presentations, various imaging modalities' characteristics, and the management of four patients, each with distinct phenotypes of CS confirmed through endomyocardial biopsy, are discussed. Advanced imaging techniques, including positron emission tomography, revealed the focal septal uptake of 18F fluorodeoxyglucose, which suggests an ongoing inflammation, whereas contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance demonstrates septal late gadolinium enhancement, which indicates replacement fibrosis. These features of multimodality imaging in CS can assist in patient diagnosis and treatment.

EANM/SNMMI guideline/procedure standard for [18F]FDG hybrid PET use in infection and inflammation in adults v2.0

INTRODUCTION

Hybrid [18F]FDG PET imaging is currently the method of choice for a wide variety of infectious and inflammatory disorders and was recently adopted in several clinical guidelines. A large amount of evidence-based articles, guidelines and appropriate use criteria have been published since the first version of this guideline in 2013.

PURPOSE

To provide updated evidence-based information to assist physicians in recommending, performing and interpreting hybrid [18F]FDG PET examinations for infectious and inflammatory disorders in the adult population.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of evidence-based articles using whole-body [18F]FDG hybrid imaging on the indications covered within this guideline was performed. All systematic reviews and meta-analyses published within the last 10 years until January 2023 were identified in PubMed/Medline or Cochrane. For each indication covered in this manuscript, diagnostic performance was provided based on meta-analyses or systematic reviews. If not available, results from prospective or retrospective studies were considered based on predefined selection criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid [18F]FDG PET is extremely useful in the work-up and management of adults with infectious and inflammatory diseases, as supported by extensive and rapidly growing evidence-based literature and adoption in clinical guidelines. Practical recommendations are provided describing evidence-based indications as well as interpretation criteria and pitfalls. Monitoring treatment response is the most challenging but insufficiently studied potential application in infection and inflammation imaging.

Can FDG PET Serve as a Clinically Relevant Tool for Detecting Active Non-sarcoidotic Myocarditis?

The diagnostic work-up for myocarditis largely depends on non-invasive imaging because of the low yield of endomyocardial biopsy. In addition, differentiation among possible impressions is essential because of its non-specific clinical presentations. This ambiguity has led to the predominant use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the management of myocarditis, particularly during the global pandemic. Despite the unique ability of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to visualize and quantify active myocardial inflammation, which has been well established in cardiac sarcoidosis, its diagnostic contribution in non-sarcoidotic myocarditis remains uncertain. This article reviews the current evidence on the non-invasive imaging diagnosis of non-sarcoidotic myocarditis and discusses the potential role of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as a clinically relevant imaging tool.

A framework for exclusion of alternative diagnoses in sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous syndrome that arises from a persistent immune response to a triggering antigen(s). There is no "gold standard" test or algorithm for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, making the diagnosis one of exclusion. The presentation of the disease varies substantially between individuals, in both the number of organs involved, and the manifestations seen in individual organs. These qualities dictate that health care providers diagnosing sarcoidosis must consider a wide range of possible alternative diagnoses, from across a range of presentations and medical specialties (infectious, inflammatory, cardiac, neurologic). Current guideline-based diagnosis of sarcoidosis recommends fulfillment of three criteria: 1) compatible clinical presentation and/or imaging 2) demonstration of granulomatous inflammation by biopsy (when possible) and, 3) exclusion of alternative causes, but do not provide guidance on standardized strategies for exclusion of alternative diagnoses. In this review, we provide a summary of the most common differential diagnoses for sarcoidosis involvement of lung, eye, skin, central nervous system, heart, liver, and kidney. We then propose a framework for testing to exclude alternative diagnoses based on pretest probability of sarcoidosis, defined as high (typical findings with sarcoidosis involvement confirmed in another organ), moderate (typical findings in a single organ), or low (atypical/findings suggesting of an alternative diagnosis). This work highlights the need for informed and careful exclusion of alternative diagnoses in sarcoidosis.

Innovations in Imaging: 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for Assessment of Cardiovascular Infection and Inflammation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT), referred to as 18F-FDG PET/CT, plays a significant role in the diagnosis and management of patients with systemic infectious and inflammatory conditions. This review provides an overview of 18F-FDG PET/CT in systemic infectious and inflammatory conditions, including infective endocarditis (IE), cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED)/left ventricular assist device (LVAD) infection, sarcoidosis, and large-vessel vasculitis (LVV).

RECENT FINDINGS

This review highlights the past and present literature in the increasing role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cardiovascular inflammation and infection, including diagnostic and prognostic findings. They key aspects of this paper are to highlight the importance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cardiovascular infection and inflammation, and to provide illustrations of how it can contribute to patient diagnosis and management.

Cardiac sarcoidosis: diagnosis and management

Non-caseating granulomatous infiltration of the myocardium is the hallmark of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). CS manifests clinically as conduction disturbance, ventricular arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death and/or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Other than confirmation through endomyocardial biopsy, a diagnosis of probable CS can be established by histological evidence of systemic sarcoidosis in addition to characteristic clinical or advanced imaging findings. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance imaging (CMR) and 18F-flurodeoxyglycose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are imaging modalities indispensable in the diagnosis and monitoring of CS. FDG-PET is the method of choice for identifying the active inflammatory phase of CS and in the monitoring and modifying of immunosuppressive treatment. CMR is better suited for assessing cardiac morphology and function. Both modalities are more effective in detecting CS when used in combination than either is alone. Management of CS is primarily based upon observational data of low quality due to a paucity of randomized controlled trials. Corticosteroid therapy and/or tiered-immunosuppression are the mainstays of treatment in reducing myocardial inflammation. Steroid-sparing agents aim to limit the unfavorable side-effects of a significant steroid burden. Antiarrhythmics and guideline-directed medical therapies are utilized for control of ventricular arrhythmia and left ventricular dysfunction respectively. CS necessitates multidisciplinary care in specialized centers to most effectively diagnose and manage the disease. Additional randomized trials are warranted to further our understanding of medical optimization in CS.

Risk Stratification in Cardiac Sarcoidosis With Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is well established for its diagnostic role in cardiac sarcoidosis, less is known about the prognostic value of PET and its use in risk stratification for major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis looking at the prognostic value of PET imaging in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.

METHODS

Study investigators systematically searched EMBASE (Excerpta Medica dataBASE), MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the European Union Clinical Trial Registry for cardiac sarcoidosis and PET imaging. The primary outcome of interest was MACE.

RESULTS

The search revealed 3,010 records, of which 55 studies were included. This represented 5,250 patients. Factors associated with MACE included the following: the combination of abnormal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and perfusion defect, which had an OR of 2.86 (95% CI: 1.74-4.71; P < 0.0001); abnormal perfusion or FDG uptake, which had an OR of 2.69 (95% CI: 1.67-4.33); abnormal FDG uptake, which had an OR of 2.61 (95% CI: 1.51-4.50); focal abnormal right ventricular uptake, which had an OR of 6.27 (95% CI: 3.19-12.32; P < 0.00001); and a lack of response to immunosuppression on serial PET, which had an OR of 8.43 (95% CI: 3.25-21.85; P < 0.0001). A QUIPS (Quality in Prognostic Studies) tool analysis found a low to moderate risk of bias, particularly given the small sample sizes in the individual studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple cardiac PET parameters provide risk stratification value in cardiac sarcoidosis. Focal right ventricular uptake and a lack of response to immunosuppressive therapy on serial PET imaging were particularly predictive of MACE.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Utilizing Cardiac MRI and PET-CT

PURPOSEOF REVIEW

Cardiac sarcoidosis is an inflammatory condition that has been associated with deleterious cardiac manifestations. The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis is challenging and can be guided by advanced cardiac imaging.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endomyocardial biopsy lacks sensitivity in confirming a diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. Studies have shown that the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cardiac Positron Emission Testing (PET) are associated with increased sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. Cardiac MRI and cardiac PET CT, although distinct entities, are complimentary in the diagnosis, prognostication of major cardiac events, and aid in the treatment algorithm in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.

Comparing the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI for detecting cardiac sarcoidosis: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative diagnostic efficacy of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in detecting cardiac sarcoidosis.

METHODS

An extensive search was conducted in the PubMed and Embase databases to identify available publications up to November 2023. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using the DerSimonian and Laird method, with subsequent transformation via the Freeman-Tukey double inverse sine transformation. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test.

RESULTS

16 articles involving 1361 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity of [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting cardiac sarcoidosis was 0.77(95%CI: 0.62-0.89), while the overall sensitivity of [18F]FDG PET/MRI was 0.94(95%CI: 0.84-1.00). The result indicated that [18F]FDG PET/MRI appears to a higher sensitivity in comparison to [18F]FDG PET/CT(P = 0.02). In contrast, the overall specificity of [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting cardiac sarcoidosis was 0.90(95%CI: 0.85-0.94), while the overall specificity of [18F]FDG PET/MRI was 0.79(95%CI: 0.53-0.96), with no significant difference in specificity (P = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicates that [18F]FDG PET/MRI demonstrates superior sensitivity and comparable specificity to [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting cardiac sarcoidosis. However, the small number of PET/MRI studies limited the evidence of current results. To validate these results, larger, prospective studies employing a head-to-head design are needed.

Assessment of treatment response in cardiac sarcoidosis based on myocardial 18F-FDG uptake

Objective

Immunosuppressive therapy for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) still largely consists of corticosteroid monotherapy. However, high relapse rates after tapering and insufficient efficacy are significant problems. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of non-biological and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nb/bDMARDs) considering control of myocardial inflammation assessed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) of the heart.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of treatment response to nb/bDMARDs of all CS patients seen in the sarcoidosis center of the University Hospital Zurich between January 2016 and December 2020.

Results

We identified 50 patients with CS. Forty-five patients with at least one follow-up PET/CT scan were followed up for a mean of 20.5 ± 12.8 months. Most of the patients were treated with prednisone and concomitant nb/bDMARDs. At the first follow-up PET/CT scan after approximately 6.7 ± 3 months, only adalimumab showed a significant reduction in cardiac metabolic activity. Furthermore, comparing all serial follow-up PET/CT scans (143), tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-based therapies showed statistically significant better suppression of myocardial 18F-FDG uptake compared to other treatment regimens. On the last follow-up, most adalimumab-treated patients were inactive (n = 15, 48%) or remitting (n = 11, 35%), and only five patients (16%) were progressive. TNFi was safe even in patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and a significant improvement in LVEF under TNFi treatment was observed.

Conclusion

TNFi shows better control of myocardial inflammation compared to nbDMARDs and corticosteroid monotherapies in patients with CS. TNFi was efficient and safe even in patients with severely reduced LVEF.

Evaluation and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis with Advanced Imaging

A high clinical suspicion in the setting of appropriate history, physical exam, laboratory, and imaging parameters is often required to set the groundwork for diagnosis and management. Echocardiography may show septal thinning, evidence of systolic and diastolic dysfunction, along with impaired global longitudinal strain. Cardiac MRI reveals late gadolinium enhancement along with evidence of myocardial edema and inflammation on T2 weighted imaging and parametric mapping. 18F-FDG PET detects the presence of active inflammation and the presence of scar. Involvement of the right ventricle on MRI or PET confers a high risk for adverse cardiac events and mortality.

[Imaging diagnostics of cardiac sarcoidosis]

Cardiac involvement is clinically apparent in approximately 5% of all patients with systemic sarcoidosis, whereas evidence of cardiac involvement by imaging studies can be found in approximately 20% of cases. Occasionally, isolated cardiac sarcoidosis is encountered and is the only sign of the disease. The most frequent cardiac manifestations of the multifocal granulomatous inflammation include atrioventricular (AV) blocks and other conduction disorders, ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death and left and right ventricular wall disorders. Accordingly, symptoms that should raise suspicion include palpitations, lightheadedness and syncope. The diagnostic approach to cardiac sarcoidosis is not straightforward. Typical echocardiographic findings include regional thinning and contraction abnormalities particularly in basal, septal and lateral locations. Infrequently, myocardial hypertrophy may be present; however, the sensitivity of echocardiography is low and cardiac sarcoidosis can be present even when an echocardiogram is unrevealing. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) frequently shows late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in a multifocal pattern often involving the basal septum and lateral walls. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting cardiac sarcoidosis are high. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) plays an important role in the diagnostic algorithm due to its ability to visualize focal inflammatory activity both in the myocardium and in extracardiac locations. This may help target the optimal location for biopsy in order to obtain histologic proof of sarcoidosis and can also be used to follow the response to anti-inflammatory treatment. Notably, the sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy is poor due to the patchy nature of myocardial involvement. In clinical practice, either histologic evidence of noncaseating granulomas from the myocardium or evidence from extracardiac tissue in combination with typical cardiac imaging findings are required to establish the diagnosis.

[Positron emission tomography in cardiological practice]

The utility of positron emission tomography in cardiology currently goes beyond the ischemic heart disease and covers an increasingly wider range of non-coronary pathology, which requires timely expert diagnostics, including chronic heart disease of any etiology, valvular and electrophysiology disorders, cardiooncology. Authors emphasize the importance of the development of positron emission tomography technologies in the Russian Federation. This includes the development and implementation of new radiopharmaceuticals for the diagnosis of pathological processes of the cardiovascular system, systemic and local inflammation, including atherosclerosis, impaired perfusion and myocardial metabolism, and also for solving specific diagnostic tasks in comorbid pathology.

Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance

In 2022, the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology® published many excellent original research articles and editorials focusing on imaging in patients with cardiovascular disease. In this review of 2022, we summarize a selection of articles to provide a concise recap of major advancements in the field. In the first part of this 2-part series, we addressed publications pertaining to single-photon emission computed tomography. In this second part, we focus on positron emission tomography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance. We specifically review advances in imaging of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, cardio-oncology, infectious disease cardiac manifestations, atrial fibrillation, detection and prognostication of atherosclerosis, and technical improvements in the field. We hope that this review will be useful to readers as a reminder to articles they have seen during the year as well as ones they have missed.

FDG PET/CT Imaging of Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. The diagnostic can be made by histological identification of non-caseous granuloma or by a combination of clinical criteria. Active inflammatory granuloma can lead to fibrotic damage. Although 50% of cases resolve spontaneously, systemic treatments are often necessary to decrease symptoms and avoid permanent organ dysfunction, notably in cardiac sarcoidosis. The course of the disease can be punctuated by exacerbations and relapses and the prognostic depends mainly on affected sites and patient management. FDG-PET/CT along with newer FDG-PET/MR have emerged as key imaging modalities in sarcoidosis, namely for certain diagnostic purposes, staging and biopsy guiding. By identifying with a high sensitivity inflammatory active granuloma, FDG hybrid imaging is a main prognostic tool and therapeutic ally in sarcoidosis. This review aims to highlight the actual critical roles of hybrid PET imaging in sarcoidosis and display a brief perspective for the future which appears to include other radiotracers and artificial intelligence applications.

Cardiovascular positron emission tomography: established and emerging role in cardiovascular diseases

Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has established themselves firmly as excellent and reliable functional imaging modalities in assessment of the spectrum of coronary artery disease. With the explosion of technology advances and the dream of flow quantification now a reality, the value of PET is now well realized. Cardiac PET has proved itself as precise imaging modality that provides functional imaging of the heart in addition to anatomical imaging. It has established itself as one of the best available techniques for evaluation of myocardial viability. Hybrid PET/computed tomography provides simultaneous integration of coronary anatomy and function with myocardial perfusion and metabolism, thereby improving characterization of the dysfunctional area and chronic coronary artery disease. The availability of quantitative myocardial blood flow evaluation with PET provides additional prognostic information and increases diagnostic accuracy in the management of patients with coronary artery disease. Hybrid imaging seems to hold immense potential in optimizing management of cardiovascular diseases and furthering clinical research.

Cardiac sarcoidosis presenting with complex conduction abnormalities as the first manifestation of widespread systemic sarcoidosis: a case report

Background

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous multi-organ disease of unknown aetiology. Despite being relatively rare, cardiac sarcoidosis constitutes a very important manifestation of sarcoidosis, as its symptoms regularly precede or occur in isolation of more prevalent ones, and as it is the main driver of mortality in systemic sarcoidosis.

Case summary

We present the case of a 37-year-old woman, in which clinically isolated cardiac sarcoidosis revealed widespread systemic sarcoidosis. Apart from constitutional symptoms and strong recurrent dizziness (i.e. near-syncopes), which persisted for multiple years already, our patient initially presented with complex conduction abnormalities, including a right bundle branch block, left anterior hemi-block, and atrioventricular block °1. Following inconclusive endomyocardial biopsies, performed due to detection of focal septal scarring on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, an ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT, performed upon admission to our clinic, showed distinct hypermetabolic lesions indicative of active inflammation in various organs and raised suspicion of systemic sarcoidosis. Eventually, histopathological evidence of non-caseating granulomas in affected lymph nodes, extracted by bronchoscopy, confirmed the diagnosis of systemic sarcoidosis after reasonable exclusion of other granulomatous diseases. Immediate initiation of long-term immunosuppressive therapy led to almost complete remission, as monitored by consequential ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT scans.

Discussion

Unexplained complex conduction abnormalities in young patients may be a sign of sarcoidosis, even in isolation of more prevalent symptoms. Correct interpretation and prompt initiation of a structured interdisciplinary diagnostic workup, including ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT as the imaging modality of choice, are essential to initiate specific treatment and obviate the major risk of mortality resulting from cardiac sarcoidosis.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

About 5% of sarcoidosis patients develop clinically manifest cardiac features. Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) typically presents with conduction abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure. Its diagnosis is challenging and requires a substantial degree of clinical suspicion as well as expertise in advanced cardiac imaging. Adverse events, particularly malignant arrhythmias and development of heart failure, are common among CS patients. A timely diagnosis is paramount to ameliorating outcomes for these patients. Despite weak evidence, immunosuppression (primarily with corticosteroids) is generally recommended in the presence of active inflammation in the myocardium. The burden of malignant arrhythmias remains important regardless of treatment, thus leading to the recommended use of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in most patients with clinically manifest CS.

Clinical Utilization of Multimodality Imaging for Myocarditis and Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Myocarditis is defined as inflammation of the myocardium according to clinical, histological, biochemical, immunohistochemical, or imaging findings. Inflammation can be categorized histologically by cell type or pattern, and many causes have been implicated, including infectious, most commonly viral, systemic autoimmune diseases, vaccine-associated processes, environmental factors, toxins, and hypersensitivity to drugs. Sarcoid myocarditis is increasingly recognized as an important cause of cardiomyopathy and has important diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications in patients with systemic sarcoidosis. The clinical presentation of myocarditis may include an asymptomatic, subacute, acute, fulminant, or chronic course and may have focal or diffuse involvement of the myocardium depending on the cause and time point of the disease. For most causes of myocarditis except sarcoidosis, myocardial biopsy is the gold standard but is limited due to risk, cost, availability, and variable sensitivity. Diagnostic criteria have been established for both myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis and include clinical and imaging findings particularly the use of cardiac magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. Beyond diagnosis, imaging findings may also provide prognostic value. This case-based review focuses on the current state of multimodality imaging for the diagnosis and management of myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis, highlighting multimodality imaging approaches with practical clinical vignettes, with a discussion of knowledge gaps and future directions.

Assessment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: FDG PET and BMIPP SPECT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an inflammatory disease of unknown etiology that can lead to life-threatening arrhythmias, heart failure, and death. Advanced cardiac imaging modalities have improved the clinician's ability to detect this disease. The purpose of this review is to discuss the recent evidence of cardiac metabolic imaging as assessed by [¹⁸F]FDG PET and [¹²³I]BMIPP SPECT in the evaluation of CS patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

[¹⁸F]FDG PET is the gold standard to identify myocardial inflammation. [¹²³I]BMIPP SPECT can uncover early myocardial damage as well as advanced stages of CS when fibrosis prevails. In presence of inflammation, myocardial [¹⁸F]FDG uptake is increased, but in contrast, BMIPP myocardial uptake is reduced or even suppressed. Thus, a complementary role of cardiac metabolic imaging by [¹⁸F]FDG PET and BMIPP SPECT has been proposed to detect the whole spectrum of CS. [¹⁸F]FDG PET is considered an important tool to improve the diagnosis and optimize the management of CS. The role of [¹²³I]BMIPP SPECT in diagnosing CS is still under investigation. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of combined cardiac metabolic imaging in the diagnosis, prognosis, and for selecting treatments in CS patients.

Transcriptional and Immune Landscape of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

Cardiac involvement is an important determinant of mortality among sarcoidosis patients. Although granulomatous inflammation is a hallmark finding in cardiac sarcoidosis, the precise immune cell populations that comprise the granuloma remain unresolved. Furthermore, it is unclear how the cellular and transcriptomic landscape of cardiac sarcoidosis differs from other inflammatory heart diseases.

METHODS

We leveraged spatial transcriptomics (GeoMx digital spatial profiler) and single-nucleus RNA sequencing to elucidate the cellular and transcriptional landscape of cardiac sarcoidosis. Using GeoMX digital spatial profiler technology, we compared the transcriptomal profile of CD68+ rich immune cell infiltrates in human cardiac sarcoidosis, giant cell myocarditis, and lymphocytic myocarditis. We performed single-nucleus RNA sequencing of human cardiac sarcoidosis to identify immune cell types and examined their transcriptomic landscape and regulation. Using multichannel immunofluorescence staining, we validated immune cell populations identified by single-nucleus RNA sequencing, determined their spatial relationship, and devised an immunostaining approach to distinguish cardiac sarcoidosis from other inflammatory heart diseases.

RESULTS

Despite overlapping histological features, spatial transcriptomics identified transcriptional signatures and associated pathways that robustly differentiated cardiac sarcoidosis from giant cell myocarditis and lymphocytic myocarditis. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing revealed the presence of diverse populations of myeloid cells in cardiac sarcoidosis with distinct molecular features. We identified GPNMB (transmembrane glycoprotein NMB) as a novel marker of multinucleated giant cells and predicted that the MITF (microphthalmia-associated transcription factor) family of transcription factors regulated this cell type. We also detected additional macrophage populations in cardiac sarcoidosis including HLA-DR (human leukocyte antigen-DR)+ macrophages, SYTL3 (synaptotagmin-like protein 3)+ macrophages and CD163+ resident macrophages. HLA-DR+ macrophages were found immediately adjacent to GPMMB+ giant cells, a distinct feature compared with other inflammatory cardiac diseases. SYTL3+ macrophages were located scattered throughout the granuloma and CD163+ macrophages, CD1c+ dendritic cells, nonclassical monocytes, and T cells were located at the periphery and outside of the granuloma. Finally, we demonstrate mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway activation is associated with proliferation and is selectively found in HLA-DR+ and SYLT3+ macrophages.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we identified diverse populations of immune cells with distinct molecular signatures that comprise the sarcoid granuloma. These findings provide new insights into the pathology of cardiac sarcoidosis and highlight opportunities to improve diagnostic testing.

The role of PET in the management of sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

PET has emerged as method to determine the location and extent of disease activity in sarcoidosis. As most clinicians do not routinely utilize PET in the management of sarcoidosis, an understanding of the imaging technique is needed to comprehend the impact that PET abnormalities have on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although PET can detect inflammation because of sarcoidosis throughout the body, it is most often utilized for the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis for which it may provide information about prognosis and adverse events. Whenever PET is combined with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), clinicians may be able to increase the diagnostic yield of imaging. Furthermore, PET abnormalities have the potential to be utilized in the reduction or augmentation of therapy based on an individual's response to treatment. Although various biomarkers are used to monitor disease activity in sarcoidosis, an established and reproducible relationship between PET and biomarkers does not exist.

SUMMARY

PET has the potential to improve the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and alter treatment decisions but prospective trials are needed to define the role of PET while also standardizing the performance and interpretation of the imaging modality.

Role of Endomyocardial Biopsy in Diagnostics of Myocarditis

Endomyocardial biopsy as the cornerstone of diagnostics has been re-evaluated throughout the years, leaving unanswered questions on the precedence of it. The reported incidence of myocarditis has increased during the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), reinforcing discussions on appropriate diagnostics of myocarditis. By analysis of evidence-based literature published within the last demi-decade, we aimed to summarize the most recent information in order to evaluate the current role of endomyocardial biopsy in diagnostics and management of myocarditis. For the most part, research published over the last five years showed ongoing uncertainty regarding the use, informativeness, safety and necessity of performing a biopsy. Special circumstances, such as fulminant clinical course or failure to respond to empirical treatment, were reconfirmed as justified indications, with a growing applicability of non-invasive diagnostic approaches for most other cases. We concluded that endomyocardial biopsy, if performed properly and with adjunct diagnostic methods, holds a critical role for treatment correction in specific histological subtypes of myocarditis and for differential diagnosis between immune-mediated myocarditis and secondary infections due to immunosuppressive treatment. A high level of possible misdiagnosing was detected, indicating the need to review terminology used to describe findings of myocardial inflammation that did not meet Dallas criteria.

Comparison of 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography imaging and 99mTc-pyrophosphate in cardiac amyloidosis

BACKGROUND

Pyrophosphate (PYP) scintigraphy provides high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis (CA). There has recently been emerging interest in using 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) for this application, yet its sensitivity has never been directly compared to that of PYP, the current molecular gold standard METHODS: Twelve subjects with ATTR-CA and 5 controls referred for PYP-SPECT were prospectively enrolled. 18F-NaF PET/CT scans were performed at 1 and 3 hours. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the images were performed, and the sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET/CT and PYP-SPECT were compared RESULTS: Visual interpretation of NaF PET/CT yielded a sensitivity of 0.25 (95% CI 0.089 to 0.53) for the detection of ATTR-CA, which is significantly inferior to that of PYP-SPECT/CT (100%, P = .016). Visual interpretation at 3 hours yielded a similar sensitivity of 0.30 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.60, P  = 1.00). There were no false-positive NaF PET studies. Mean target-to-background ratio (TBRmean) at 1h did not differ significantly (P = .21) in ATTR-CA subjects (0.83 ± 0.15) compared to controls (0.72 ± 0.15). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.69 ± 0.16 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.00, P = .23).

CONCLUSION

With qualitative and quantitative analyses, sensitivity of NaF PET/CT is significantly inferior to that of PYP-SPECT for the diagnosis of ATTR-CA.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac MRI versus FDG PET for Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background There is limited consensus regarding the relative diagnostic performance of cardiac MRI and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET for cardiac sarcoidosis. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac MRI and FDG PET for cardiac sarcoidosis. Materials and Methods Medline, Ovid Epub, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Emcare, and Scopus were searched from inception until January 2022. Inclusion criteria included studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac MRI or FDG PET for cardiac sarcoidosis in adults. Data were independently extracted by two investigators. Summary accuracy metrics were obtained by using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression was used to assess the effect of different covariates. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The study protocol was registered a priori in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Prospero protocol CRD42021214776). Results Thirty-three studies were included (1997 patients, 687 with cardiac sarcoidosis); 17 studies evaluated cardiac MRI (1031 patients) and 26 evaluated FDG PET (1363 patients). Six studies directly compared cardiac MRI and PET in the same patients (303 patients). Cardiac MRI had higher sensitivity than FDG PET (95% vs 84%; P = .002), with no difference in specificity (85% vs 82%; P = .85). In a sensitivity analysis restricted to studies with direct comparison, point estimates were similar to those from the overall analysis: cardiac MRI and FDG PET had sensitivities of 92% and 81% and specificities of 72% and 82%, respectively. Covariate analysis demonstrated that sensitivity for FDG PET was highest with quantitative versus qualitative evaluation (93% vs 76%; P = .01), whereas sensitivity for MRI was highest with inclusion of T2 imaging (99% vs 88%; P = .001). Thirty studies were at risk of bias. Conclusion Cardiac MRI had higher sensitivity than fluorodeoxyglucose PET for diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis but similar specificity. Limitations, including risk of bias and few studies with direct comparison, necessitate additional study. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Advances in Diagnostic Imaging for Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown etiology, and its clinical presentation depends on the affected organ. Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is one of the leading causes of death among patients with sarcoidosis. The clinical manifestations of CS are heterogeneous, and range from asymptomatic to life-threatening arrhythmias and progressive heart failure due to the extent and location of granulomatous inflammation in the myocardium. Advances in imaging techniques have played a pivotal role in the evaluation of CS because histological diagnoses obtained by myocardial biopsy tend to have lower sensitivity. The diagnosis of CS is challenging, and several approaches, notably those using positron emission tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been reported. Delayed-enhanced computed tomography (CT) may also be used for diagnosing CS in patients with MRI-incompatible devices and allows acceptable evaluation of myocardial hyperenhancement in such patients. This article reviews the advances in imaging techniques for the evaluation of CS.

PET Imaging in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Narrative Review with Focus on Novel PET Tracers

Sarcoidosis is a multi-system inflammatory disease characterized by the development of inflammation and noncaseating granulomas that can involve nearly every organ system, with a predilection for the pulmonary system. Cardiac involvement of sarcoidosis (CS) occurs in up to 70% of cases, and accounts for a significant share of sarcoid-related mortality. The clinical presentation of CS can range from absence of symptoms to conduction abnormalities, heart failure, arrhythmias, valvular disease, and sudden cardiac death. Given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with CS, timely diagnosis is important. Traditional imaging modalities and histologic evaluation by endomyocardial biopsy often provide a low diagnostic yield. Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) has emerged as a leading advanced imaging modality for the diagnosis and management of CS. This review article will summarize several aspects of the current use of PET in CS, including indications for use, patient preparation, image acquisition and interpretation, diagnostic and prognostic performance, and evaluation of treatment response. Additionally, this review will discuss novel PET radiotracers currently under study or of potential interest in CS.

Cardiac sarcoidosis: from diagnosis to treatment

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown cause. Its clinical presentations are heterogeneous and virtually any organ system can be affected, most commonly lungs. The manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are heterogenous depending on the extent and location of the disease and range from asymptomatic forms to life-threatening arrhythmias as well as to progressive heart failure. Cardiac involvement is associated with a worse prognosis. The diagnosis of CS is often challenging and requires a multimodality approach based on current international recommendations. Pharmacological treatment of CS is based on administration of anti-inflammatory therapy (mainly corticosteroids), which is often combined with heart failure medication and/or antiarrhythmics. Nonpharmacological therapeutic approaches in CS cover pacemaker or defibrillator implantation, catheter ablations and heart transplantation. This review aims to summarize the current understanding of CS including its epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic possibilities.

Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2020: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance

Although the year 2020 was different from other years in many respects, the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology published excellent articles pertaining to imaging in patients with cardiovascular disease due to the dedication of the investigators in our field all over the world. In this review, we will summarize a selection of these articles to provide a concise review of the main advancements that have recently occurred in the field and provide the reader with an opportunity to review a wide selection of articles. We will focus on publications dealing with positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance and hope that you will find this review helpful.

The prognostic role of cardiac positron emission tomography imaging in patients with sarcoidosis: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Sarcoidosis is a multi-systemic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) has been reported in as much as 25% of patients with systemic involvement. 18Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has a high diagnostic sensitivity/specificity in the diagnosis of CS. The aim of this review is to summarize evidence on the prognostic role of FDG PET.

METHODS

Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE from inception to October 2020. Medical subject headings (MeSH) terms for sarcoidosis; cardiac and FDG PET imaging were used. Studies of any design assessing the prognostic role of FDG PET in patients with either suspected or confirmed cardiac sarcoidosis imaging done at baseline were included. Abnormal PET was defined as abnormal metabolism (presence of focal or focal-on-diffuse uptake of FDG) OR abnormal metabolism and a perfusion defect. Studies reporting any outcome measure were included. Pooled risk ratio for the composite outcome of MACE was done.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies were selected for final inclusion (515 patients, 53.4% women, 19.8% racial minorities.) Studies were institution based, retrospective in design and enrolled consecutive patients. All were observational in nature and published in English. All studies used a qualitative assessment of PET scans (abnormal FDG uptake with or without abnormal perfusion). Two studies assessed quantitative metrics (summed stress score in segments with abnormal FDG uptake, standardized uptake value and cardiac metabolic activity.) All studies reported major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as a composite outcome. After a mean follow up ranging from 1.4 to 4.1 years, there were a total of 105 MACE. All studies included death (either all-cause death or sudden cardiac death) and ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) as a component of MACE. Four of the six studies adjusted for several characteristics in their analysis. All four studies used left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, other adjustment variables were not consistent across studies. Five studies found a positive prognostic association with the primary outcome, two of which assessing right ventricular uptake.

CONCLUSION

Although available evidence indicates FDG PET can be used in the risk stratification of patients with CS, our findings show further studies are needed to quantify the effect in this patient group.

Clinical Features and Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an unusual, but potentially harmful, manifestation of systemic sarcoidosis (SA), a chronic disease characterized by organ involvement from noncaseating and nonnecrotizing granulomas. Lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes are usually the sites that are most frequently affected, but no organ is spared and CS can affect a variable portion of SA patients, up to 25% from post-mortem studies. The cardiovascular involvement is usually associated with a bad prognosis and is responsible for the major cause of death and complications, particularly in African American patients. Furthermore, the diagnosis is often complicated by the occurrence of non-specific clinical manifestations, which can mimic the effect of more common heart disorders, and imaging and biopsies are the most valid approach to avoid misdiagnosis. This narrative review summarizes the main clinical features of CS and imaging findings, particularly of CMR and 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) that can give the best cost/benefit ratio in terms of the diagnostic approach. Imaging can be very useful in replacing the endomyocardial biopsy in selected cases, to avoid unnecessary, and potentially dangerous, invasive maneuvers.

Diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis despite negative findings on serial late gadolinium enhancement with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging/18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography examinations

We present a case of a 42-year-old Japanese man with ocular and pulmonary sarcoidosis who eventually led to a diagnosis with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) through endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), despite negative findings on both late gadolinium enhancement with cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) develops in only 5% of patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Previous studies have reported that CS was found in up to 50% of autopsy series with fatal sarcoidosis, implying that CS is frequently underdiagnosed with potentially life-threatening consequences. Therefore, the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of CS are important. Currently, LGE-CMR and FDG-PET play an important role in establishing a diagnosis of CS with high sensitivity. In the presented case, regardless of serial examinations with LGE-CMR and FDG-PET, confirmed diagnosis of CS could not be achieved; ultimately, a definitive diagnosis of CS was obtained through EMB. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case showing the diagnosis of CS despite negative findings on serial LGE-CMR and FDG-PET examinations.

Myocardial 18F-FDG Uptake Pattern for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Oncologic PET/CT

OBJECTIVE

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose (18F-FDG-PET/CT) has become the standard staging modality in various tumor entities. Cancer patients frequently receive cardio-toxic therapies. However, routine cardiovascular assessment in oncologic patients is not performed in current clinical practice. Accordingly, this study sought to assess whether myocardial 18F-FDG uptake patterns of patients undergoing oncologic PET/CT can be used for cardiovascular risk stratification.

METHODS

Myocardial 18F-FDG uptake pattern was assessed in 302 patients undergoing both oncologic whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT and myocardial perfusion imaging by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-MPI) within a six-month period. Primary outcomes were myocardial 18F-FDG uptake pattern, impaired myocardial perfusion, ongoing ischemia, myocardial scar, and left ventricular ejection fraction.

RESULTS

Among all patients, 109 (36.1%) displayed no myocardial 18F-FDG uptake, 77 (25.5%) showed diffuse myocardial 18F-FDG uptake, 24 (7.9%) showed focal 18F-FDG uptake, and 92 (30.5%) had a focal on diffuse myocardial 18F-FDG uptake pattern. In contrast to the other uptake patterns, focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake was predominantly observed in patients with myocardial abnormalities (i.e., abnormal perfusion, impaired LVEF, myocardial ischemia, or scar). Accordingly, a multivariate logistic regression identified focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake as a strong predictor of abnormal myocardial function/perfusion (odds ratio (OR) 5.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73-16.34, p = 0.003). Similarly, focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake was an independent predictor of ongoing ischemia and myocardial scar (OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.53-11.4, p = 0.005 and OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.47-9.69, p = 0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake seen on oncologic PET/CT indicates a significantly increased risk for multiple myocardial abnormalities. Obtaining and taking this information into account will help to stratify patients according to risk and will reduce unnecessary cardiovascular complications in cancer patients.

Evidence-Based PET for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases

Nuclear medicine techniques are non-invasive tools that can early detect pathophysiological changes in affected tissues in patients with inflammatory or infectious diseases. These changes usually occur before clinical onset of symptoms and before the development of anatomical changes detected by radiological techniques [1, 2]. Currently, hybrid imaging techniques as positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) may provide functional and morphological information for early diagnosis of infectious and inflammatory diseases [1, 2].

Arrhythmogenic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Challenge for Cardio-Rheumatology

Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) is an expression of autoimmune inflammatory cardiomyopathy (AIC), caused by structural, electrical, or inflammatory heart disease, and has a serious impact on a patient's outcome. Myocardial scar of ischemic or nonischemic origin through a re-entry mechanism facilitates the development of VA. Additionally, autoimmune myocardial inflammation, either isolated or as a part of the generalized inflammatory process, also facilitates the development of VA through arrhythmogenic autoantibodies and inflammatory channelopathies. The clinical presentation of AIC varies from oligo-asymptomatic presentation to severe VA and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Both positron emission tomography (PET) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can diagnose AIC early and be useful tools for the assessment of therapies during follow-ups. The AIC treatment should be focused on the following: (1) early initiation of cardiac medication, including ACE-inhibitors, b-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists; (2) early initiation of antirheumatic medication, depending on the underlying disease; and (3) potentially implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and/or ablation therapy in patients who are at high risk for SCD.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this state-of-the-art review, we highlight our current understanding of diagnosis, assessment, and management of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), focusing on recently published data and expert consensus statement guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Academic interest in cardiac sarcoidosis research has increased over the past decade along with increased clinical awareness among clinicians. In 2014, the Heart Rhythm Society published the first expert consensus statement on diagnosing and managing arrhythmias associated with CS. Cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged as a valuable tool both for diagnosing CS and predicting risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias based on burden of late gadolinium enhancement. Cardiac fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography now plays a role in diagnosis, risk stratification, and assessing response to immunosuppressive therapy. Collaborative, multidisciplinary research efforts are needed to further our understanding of this rare, complex disease. Two large multicenter prospective registries-the international Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium and the Canadian Cardiac Sarcoidosis Research Group-are enrolling patients to help provide insights into the natural history of the disease and current treatment strategies. Future research should focus on randomized controlled trials comparing different treatment strategies and identifying and testing novel therapeutic agents.