Outcomes in GLP-1 RA-Experienced Patients Switching to Once-Weekly Semaglutide in a Real-World Setting: The Retrospective, Observational EXPERT Study

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Individuals Who Discontinue Liraglutide and Who Switch from Liraglutide to Once-Weekly Injectable Semaglutide

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in the USA for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who discontinued the injectable glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) once-daily liraglutide for T2D (with no other glucose-lowering agent added) or switched from liraglutide to the GLP-1 RA once-weekly semaglutide for T2D.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, we utilized claims data (Merative MarketScan [Merative, Ann Arbor, MI, USA] Commercial and Medicare Database; January 1, 2017-March 31, 2021) to compare HCRU and costs between individuals who discontinued liraglutide ("discontinuers") and those who switched from liraglutide to semaglutide ("switchers"). Patients were indexed between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2020. Outcomes were compared between discontinuers and switchers over the 360-day post-index period using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the two cohorts were balanced after weighting. Switchers had significantly lower HCRU in inpatient and emergency department (ED) settings compared with discontinuers. Mean [standard deviation] total medical costs were significantly lower for switchers ($8513 [$18,931]) than for discontinuers ($13,585 [$52,011], p < 0.001), driven by reduced inpatient costs (2.6 times lower) and ED costs (1.6 times lower).

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrates that the cohort of people switching from liraglutide to semaglutide was associated with significantly lower HCRU and costs when compared with people discontinuing liraglutide only. These findings imply that switching to semaglutide could be a good option for people with T2D for whom liraglutide is no longer optimal.

Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors: Real-World Impact on Weight, HbA1c, and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Type 2 Diabetes (PAUSE)

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials have demonstrated greater glycemic control and weight loss with once-weekly (OW) semaglutide versus other anti-diabetes medications, including sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet real-world evidence is limited.

METHODS

This observational study of adults with uncontrolled T2D (HbA1c ≥ 7.0%) initiating semaglutide OW or SGLT2is (January 2018-February 2022; first prescription = index) utilized linked data from IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus adjudicated claims and Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records databases. Among the all semaglutide OW cohort and subgroups (1: persistent [≤ 60-day gap in semaglutide OW supply]; 2: receiving maximum dose ≥ 1 mg; and 3: persistent and ≥ 1 mg dose), changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) outcomes from baseline to 1 year post index were descriptively compared. For the main analysis, changes in weight, BMI, HbA1c, and all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) after 1 year were compared among adjusted semaglutide OW and comparator SGLT2i cohorts, following inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

RESULTS

The all semaglutide OW cohort included 772 patients, and IPTW adjusted cohorts included 416 semaglutide OW patients and 1093 SGLT2i patients. Significant (P < 0.0001) mean changes from baseline were observed in the all semaglutide OW cohort and all subgroups, in weight (kg [all: - 4.4; 1: - 5.0; 2: - 4.9; 3: - 5.2]), BMI (kg/m2 [all: - 1.5; 1: - 1.8; 2: - 1.8; 3: - 1.9]), and HbA1c (% [all: - 1.5; 1: - 1.7; 2: - 1.5; 3: - 1.6]). Post-IPTW adjustment, the semaglutide OW cohort had significantly greater mean reductions versus the SGLT2i cohort in weight (- 4.4 versus - 3.4 kg, P = 0.0061), BMI (- 1.5 versus - 1.1 kg/m2, P = 0.0013), and HbA1c (- 1.6 versus - 1.2%, P < 0.0001), with similar all-cause HCRU.

CONCLUSION

Adults with T2D initiating semaglutide OW in the real-world had significant decreases in weight, BMI, and HbA1c after 1 year, with greater improvements versus SGLT2i, and similar HCRU.

Clinical Factors Associated with Body-weight Reduction Induced by Semaglutide 1.0 mg Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Introduction

We examined the clinical factors associated with a decrease in weight induced by weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

Patients with T2DM who visited the Diabetes Care Center of Jinnouchi Hospital between June 2020 and October 2023 and were treated with semaglutide, 1.0 mg weekly, in addition to their ongoing medications were retrospectively registered. We measured body weight both before weekly administration of 1.0 mg semaglutide and 180 days after treatment and calculated the change in weight.

Results

A total of 96 patients with T2DM were enrolled, with a mean body weight of 87.2 ± 17.1 kg and mean HbA1c of 7.3 ± 1.7% at baseline. The greater response group, defined as having 1.0 mg weekly semaglutide treatment-related weight reduction of more than 7.0%, comprised 23 patients (24.0%). Weekly 1.0 mg semaglutide treatment for 180 days significantly reduced body weight (-3.1 ± 4.8 kg, p < 0.001) and glycated hemoglobin (-0.39% ± 1.23%, p = 0.003). Multivariable logistic regression analysis found that pretreatment high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels per 1.0 mg/dL (odds ratio [OR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.09, p = 0.02) were independently and significantly associated with greater weight reduction after weekly 1.0 mg semaglutide treatment, while a switch from other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.87; p = 0.03) was independently and significantly associated with lesser weight reduction after weekly 1.0 mg semaglutide treatment. In receiver-operator characteristic analysis, the cutoff value of pretreatment HDL-cholesterol levels for the presence of greater response in weight reduction was 46 mg/dL (sensitivity 61%, specificity 62%; p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Pretreatment HDL-cholesterol levels serve as important information for weekly treatment with 1.0 mg semaglutide in patients with T2DM and expectation of weight reduction.

Real-world evidence on the utilization, clinical and comparative effectiveness, and adverse effects of newer GLP-1RA-based weight-loss therapies

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as key agents for weight management, based on their marked efficacy as observed in randomized controlled trials. While still limited, real-world studies on GLP-1RA use in populations with obesity are increasingly available. This narrative review discusses contemporary real-world evidence demonstrating the utilization, clinical and comparative effectiveness, and adverse effects of the currently approved GLP-1RA-based weight-loss therapies, that is, liraglutide, semaglutide and tirzepatide. The observed weight reduction in clinical practice overall tends to be lower than in randomized controlled trials; however, outcomes approach those seen in trials when focusing on highly adherent patients. Real-world studies demonstrate high discontinuation rates of GLP-1RAs (20%-50%) within the first year, and the use of much lower doses than those evaluated in clinical trials. Evidence from observational studies within type 2 diabetes or obesity populations suggests frequent gastrointestinal disturbances in GLP-1RA users, as also observed in trials, but no clear increase in risks of severe events like pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer, thyroid disorders, or depression and self-harm. Further evidence is needed to understand possible real-world associations of GLP-1RAs with eye disease and other rare outcomes. We provide 10 areas of particular importance for further research on GLP-1RA within the real-world space, including improved understanding of the exact drivers of early discontinuation and suboptimal dosing, studies of the effects of stopping GLP-1RA treatment, and investigations of clinical and cost-effectiveness for hard clinical outcomes in real-world settings, including not only cardio-reno-metabolic outcomes but also obesity-induced diseases like neuropsychiatric disease, cancer, musculoskeletal disease, and infections. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Recent advancements in weight-loss medications have sparked a lot of interest. The so-called GLP-1 receptor agonist medications (GLP-1RAs) have gained a lot of attention, because they have shown to be very effective, leading to significant weight loss in patients participating in clinical trials. GLP-1RAs, like liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide, help manage weight by mimicking hormones that control blood sugar and appetite. However, how these medications perform in real life can be different from the controlled settings of clinical trials, in which patients are carefully selected and their treatment plans closely followed. This literature review looks at how these medications are used and their effectiveness and safety in real-world settings. In real-life practice, GLP-1RAs are often less effective than in clinical trial conditions. This is usually because patients don't follow their medication plans as strictly as in trials. Real-world data shows that many patients use lower doses and do not stick to their treatment as strictly as participants in a controlled trial might, leading to less weight loss. However, those who do follow their plans closely can achieve results similar to those in trials. A major issue with GLP-1RAs is that many patients stop using them within the first year due to side effects or high costs of the medications, especially if not covered by insurance. Common side effects include nausea and digestive problems, which are the main reasons patients stop taking these treatments. These side effects are often manageable and decrease over time, and this reviews found no strong real-world evidence that GLP-1RAs cause severe side effects in many users. Despite these challenges, when GLP-1RAs are used effectively and consistently, they show substantial benefits in weight loss, most so the newest medications semaglutide and tirzepatide. These medications are also likely to help manage and prevent weight-related health conditions like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, but evidence for these beneficial outcomes is still scarce in real-world settings. The review emphasizes the need for more research to understand why many patients stop using these medications and how to improve dosing. It also calls for studies on the long-term effects of these therapies on various health outcomes, including mental health, cardiometabolic health, cancer, and rare conditions like eye diseases. Overall, while GLP-1RAs are a valuable tool for weight management, their real-world use requires careful consideration of individual patient factors, such as the ability to stick to treatment plans, manage side effects, and afford the medications. Further research will help make these treatments more effective for a wider range of people that need them.

Drug adherence, glycemic control, and weight reduction with subcutaneous semaglutide in real-world management of type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

We describe changes in HbA1c and body-weight and the relationship between drug adherence and clinical response in a large real-world cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with subcutaneous semaglutide for up to three years.

METHODS

We included adults with T2D registered at Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel, who initiated subcutaneous semaglutide (August 2019 - June 2022). Adherence, assessed as Proportion of Days Covered (PDC), was based on drug's dispensation. We assessed the absolute change in HbA1c and the relative change in body-weight from baseline.

RESULTS

The 23,442 participants (11,513 women) had a mean age of 62.2 years, HbA1c of 7.6 %, and BMI of 33.7 kg/m2. Compared to baseline, the mean reductions in HbA1c were 0.77 [95 %CI 0.75-0.78], 0.57 [0.53-0.61], and 0.35 [0.27-0.44] %-points at 6 months, 2 years, and 3 years, respectively. The respective body-weight reductions were 4.9 % [4.8-5.0], 5.3% [5.1-5.5], and 4.5 % [3.7-5.2]. Among 6049 patients with ≥2 years of potential follow-up, median PDC between 0-6 months was 83.9 %, and remained relatively stable thereafter, reaching 74.6 % between 18-24 months. Higher PDC was associated with more pronounced HbA1c and body-weight reductions.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term real-world adherence with semaglutide was relatively stable. Semaglutide use was associated with sustained glycemic control and weight reduction in patients with T2D and relatively good baseline glycemic control, especially among those with high adherence, supporting its use for long-term management of T2D.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist-Experienced Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Switching to Once-Weekly Semaglutide in a Real-World Setting: SURE Program Post Hoc Analysis

INTRODUCTION

To investigate outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes who switched to once-weekly (OW) semaglutide from another glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) in clinical practice.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis used data from the SemaglUtide Real-world Evidence (SURE) program, which included nine observational studies investigating the initiation of OW semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice. Using a random coefficient-adjusted mixed model for repeated measurements, changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, and body mass index were analyzed for GLP-1RA-experienced patients who had at least one documented HbA1c value within the 12 weeks before switching to OW semaglutide. In addition, descriptive statistics were used for HbA1c, body weight target achievement, and safety data.

RESULTS

Of the 3,505 patients included in the nine SURE studies, 651 switched to OW semaglutide from another GLP-1RA. GLP-1RA-experienced patients who switched to OW semaglutide demonstrated a 0.67%-point [95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.74; - 0.60, p < 0.0001] reduction in HbA1c, and a 3.69-kg [95% CI - 3.98; - 3.41, p < 0.0001] reduction in body weight over 30 weeks. A body weight reduction of ≥ 5% was achieved by 27.6% of patients, and 33.3% of patients with baseline HbA1c ≥ 7% achieved HbA1c < 7% at end of study. No new safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from this post hoc analysis suggest that, for those not adequately responding to treatment with other GLP-1RAs, switching to OW semaglutide could provide additional glycemic and weight benefits with the convenience of an OW dosing regimen.

Cardiovascular risk associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus other conventional glucose-lowering drugs in patients with type-2 diabetes: protocol for a nationwide observational comparative study in routine care

INTRODUCTION

Several cardiovascular outcome trials have been conducted to assess the cardiovascular safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) on cardiorenal outcomes in patients with type-2 diabetes (T2D). However, the strict requirements of randomised controlled trials to avoid most confounding factors are at the expense of external validity. Using national real-world data, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of GLP-1RAs in association with metformin especially on cardiovascular events, hospitalisation for heart failure and all-cause death in comparison with other diabetes treatment schemes using dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, sulfonylureas/glinides or insulin also associated with metformin. Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) will be excluded as comparators, as this class of oral hypoglycaemic agents just started in 2020 to be marketed in France.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Système National des Données de Santé is a comprehensive nationwide administrative healthcare database in France that covers approximately 67 million people.Several cohorts of adult patients with T2D initiating any GLP1-RA in dual or triple therapies, as recommended by the French Health authorities, will be identified in this database over the period 2016-2021. These cohorts will be defined by the combination of glucose-lowering drugs prescribed simultaneously with GLP1-RA and diabetes treatment received over a 6-month period before GLP1-RA initiation. They will be first matched with T2D controls (1:3 ratio) based on the year of drug initiation and treatment regimens before and simultaneously with GLP1-RA in the different selected cohorts. Comparative analyses will be conducted versus these control groups, adjusting for cardiovascular event history and a propensity score considering age, sex, area of residence, deprivation index, comorbidities, duration of diabetes, use of lipid-lowering drugs, anticoagulants, antiplatelet therapies and blood pressure-lowering therapies. Comparative analyses will be conducted versus these control groups, using a high-dimensional propensity scores method and fixed baseline characteristics. Treatment effects on the different outcomes measured will be estimated for each GLP1-RA group, through HR and their corresponding CIs (95% CI) using Cox regressions and/or competitive risk regressions when necessary.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by an independent ethics committee (Comité éthique et scientifique pour les recherches, les études et les évaluations dans le domaine de la santé, Paris, France; reference: 8699786, dated 2 June 2022) and has been registered with the French National Data Protection Commission (Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés, Paris, France; reference: 922161, dated 26 June 2022). The findings of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

F20220803152803.

REAL life study of subcutaneous SEMaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes in SPain: Ambispective, multicenter clinical study. Results in the GLP1-experienced cohort

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of switching to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were previously treated with other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in a real-world setting in Spain.

METHODS

The REAL Life study of SEMaglutide in Patients with Type 2 diabetes in Spain (REALSEM-SP) was conducted in four endocrinology departments in Madrid, Spain. Adult patients with T2DM who were prescribed once-weekly (OW) subcutaneous semaglutide and had been previously treated with other GLP-1 RAs were included. Baseline characteristics, including demographic, anthropometric, and laboratory variables, were recorded at baseline and at 6 ± 3 and 12 ± 3 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c at 12 ± 3 months of follow-up, with secondary outcomes including changes in weight, BMI, and other glycemic parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 61.6 years and a mean T2DM duration of 11.3 years. The majority of patients had grade 1 or 2 obesity at baseline. Switching to OW-semaglutide was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline to 13 months (-0.35 % ± 0.81). Patients who reached the 1.0 mg OW-dose showed a significant reduction in HbA1c compared to those on the ≤0.5 mg OW-dose. Significant reductions in weight, BMI, and fasting plasma glucose were also observed. Adverse events were mostly gastrointestinal and led to treatment withdrawal in few cases.

CONCLUSION

Switching to OW-subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with T2DM previously treated with other GLP-1 RAs was associated to improvements in glycemic control and weight management in a real-world setting in Spain. These findings support the use of OW-semaglutide as an effective option for patients with T2DM who require additional glycemic control and weight management.

Real-World Evaluation of Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain (SEMA-RW Study)

Although, in randomized clinical trials, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (OW s.c.) has demonstrated superior efficacy in comparison with placebo and active controls in terms of glycemic control and body weight reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), these results need to be confirmed in a real-world (RW) setting. An RW ambispective study (6 months retrospective and 6 months prospective) was conducted in 10 tertiary hospitals in Spain. We evaluated changes in HbA1c and body weight in patients with T2DM treated with semaglutide OW s.c. Additionally, we analyzed different subgroups of patients treated with semaglutide OW s.c. as an add-on to glucose-lowering therapy. A total of 752 patients with a mean age of 60.2 years, a mean HbA1c level of 8.5%, a mean body weight of 101.6 kg, and a mean T2DM duration of 10 years were included. At 12 months, compared with baseline, there was a mean difference of -2.1% in HbA1c levels (p < 0.001) and a mean difference of 9.2 kg in body weight (p < 0.001). Moreover, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between baseline and month 12 in both HbA1c and body weight in the four subgroups receiving semaglutide OW s.c. as an add-on to glucose-lowering therapy. Semaglutide OW s.c. was well tolerated, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most commonly reported side effects. In this RW study, 12 months of treatment with semaglutide OW s.c. in patients with T2DM was associated with significant and clinically relevant improvements in glycemic control and weight loss, regardless of the glucose-lowering therapy received, and the overall safety profile was positive.

Switching to Tirzepatide 5 mg From Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: Clinical Expectations in the First 12 Weeks of Treatment

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study aimed to describe the clinical course in terms of glycemic outcomes, body weight, and adverse events during the first 12 weeks following a switch from glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) directly to tirzepatide 5 mg.

METHODS

Participants were ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes (T2D), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5% to ≤9.0%, body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 and were on a stable treatment dose of GLP-1 RAs (liraglutide every day [1.2, 1.8 mg], semaglutide once-weekly [0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg], or dulaglutide once-weekly [0.75, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 mg]) for ≥3 months at baseline. The primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline at week 12. Secondary end points included change from baseline in fasting serum glucose, body weight, and glucose assessed by continuous glucose monitoring. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Participants were 58.3 years on average, with baseline HbA1c 7.39%, body mass index 35.18 kg/m2, T2D duration around 12.4 years, and included 55% females. Semaglutide (55%) and dulaglutide (42%) were the most commonly used GLP-1 RAs at baseline with semaglutide 1.0 mg and dulaglutide 1.5 mg being the most common treatment doses. At week 12, mean HbA1c changed from baseline by -0.43%, fasting serum glucose by -7.83 mg/dL, and body weight by -2.15 kg (all P < .01). Glycemic outcomes and body weight improved in participants in all baseline GLP-1 RA subgroups. Twenty participants (13.2%) developed gastrointestinal events. Three (2%) participants discontinued tirzepatide due to adverse events. There were no severe hypoglycemic events or deaths.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, when people with T2D on stable GLP-1 RA treatment were switched directly to tirzepatide 5 mg, they experienced improved glycemic outcomes and additional weight reduction with an acceptable risk of adverse gastrointestinal events over 12 weeks.

Real world use of tirzepatide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in an Arab population

AIM

Tirzepatide is a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) dual receptor agonist (RA) that reduces glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight in patients with type 2 diabetes. We assessed the effectiveness of tirzepatide in real-world use in an Arab population.

METHODS

Review of clinical data from a specialist outpatient diabetes centre; study time points and outcome measures were pre-specified.

RESULTS

Tirzepatide was initiated in 8945 patients between 24 October 2022 and 31 December 2023. Of these, 3686 individuals reached 40 weeks of follow-up. At initiation, the mean ± SD age was 54.1 ± 11.5 years, body mass index 34.6 ± 6.0 kg/m2 and HbA1c 7.3 ± 1.5% (56 ± 17 mmol/mol); 2296 (62%) were switched to tirzepatide from another GLP-RA and 317 (8.6%) reported previous bariatric surgery. The maximum dose dispensed was ≥12.5 mg/week in 1087, 7.5-10.0 mg/week in 1688 and 2.5-5.0 mg/week in 911. The mean 40-week reduction in HbA1c was 0.6 ± 1.2% (8 ± 13 mmol/mol) and the reduction in weight was 4.5 ± 6.9 kg (4.8 ± 7.3%). GLP-RA-naïve patients experienced a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c [1.0 ± 1.3% (11 ± 14 mmol/mol) versus 0.5 ± 1.2% (6 ± 13 mmol/mol), p < .0001] and weight (7.2 ± 8.6 vs. 4.2 ± 6.6 kg, p < .0001) compared with previously exposed individuals. Post-metabolic bariatric surgery patients lost significantly more weight (7.8 ± 9.4 vs. 4.5 ± 7.0 kg, p < .0001). Improvements in blood pressure, lipid profile, and liver transaminases were noted at 40 weeks. Tirzepatide was well tolerated, with 288 (7.8%) of patients discontinuing treatment because of adverse effects, predominantly gastrointestinal.

CONCLUSION

In real-world use, tirzepatide significantly reduced HbA1c levels and weight and was well tolerated. Previous GLP-RA use was associated with significantly lesser HbA1c and weight reduction, and previous metabolic bariatric surgery was associated with greater weight loss.

Real-World Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (OW GLP-1RAs) in Comparison with Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors (DPP-4is) for Glycemic Control and Weight Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (RELATE)

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of once-weekly (OW) glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) has been established in several trials in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, real-world evidence on their effectiveness is limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of OW GLP-1RA regarding glycemic and weight outcomes, and relative to DPP-4i in a comparator analysis.

METHODS

This observational cohort study evaluated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight outcomes in people with T2DM with two or more prescription claims for the same OW GLP-1RA using a pre-post study design (including for a semaglutide OW T2DM subgroup, hereafter referred to as semaglutide). Comparator analysis for the same outcome was performed for OW GLP-1RAs versus DPP-4i and semaglutide subgroup versus DPP-4i. A linked patient population from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database and the Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records (AEMR) database was analyzed using data from January 2017 to April 2022. HbA1c and weight were assessed at baseline and at the end of the 12-month post-index period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for imbalances in baseline patient characteristics in the comparator analysis.

RESULTS

In the pre-post analysis, a greater numerical reduction in HbA1c and weight was observed for the semaglutide subgroup (N = 354) relative to the OW GLP-1RA cohort (N = 921). In the semaglutide subgroup, 52.5% and 34.2% of patients achieved HbA1c of < 7.0% and ≥ 5% weight loss, respectively. For the comparator analysis, the OW GLP-1RAs (N = 651) were significantly more effective (p < 0.001) in reducing HbA1c (- 1.5% vs. -  1.0%) and weight (- 3.2 kg vs. -  1.0 kg) than the DPP-4is (N = 431). Similarly, the semaglutide cohort (N = 251) also displayed more effectiveness (p < 0.001) in reducing HbA1c (- 1.7% vs. -  0.9%) and weight (- 4.1 kg vs. -  1.3 kg) than the respective DPP-4i cohort (N = 417). Patients initiating OW GLP-1RAs, including the semaglutide cohort, were at least twice as likely to achieve HbA1c and weight outcomes as well as composite outcomes compared with those initiating DPP-4is.

CONCLUSION

The study reinforces that OW GLP-1RAs are more effective in glycemic control and weight reduction compared with DPP-4is in people with T2DM in the real-world setting. These findings align with the recommendation in the current guidelines for utilizing glucose-lowering treatment regimens that support weight-management goals in people with T2DM.

Impact of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Agonist Deprescription in Type 2 Diabetes in a Real-World Setting: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1) elicit substantial reductions in glycemia and body weight in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity, but existing data suggest the therapy must be continued indefinitely to maintain clinical improvements. Given the high cost and poor real-world persistence of GLP-1, an effective therapy that enables deprescription with sustained clinical improvements would be beneficial. Thus, the purpose of this real-world study was to assess the effect of GLP-1 deprescription on glycemia and body weight following co-therapy with carbohydrate restricted nutrition therapy (CRNT) supported via telemedicine in a continuous remote care model.

METHODS

A retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study among patients with T2D at a telemedicine clinic was conducted. Patients in whom GLP-1 were deprescribed (DeRx; n = 154) were matched 1:1 with patients in whom GLP-1 were continued (Rx). HbA1c and body weight at enrollment in clinic (pre-CRNT), at date of deprescription or index date (derx/ID), and at 6 and 12 months (m) post-derx/ID were utilized in this study.

RESULTS

No regression in weight was observed following deprescription with > 70% maintaining ≥ 5% weight loss 12 m post-derx/ID. HbA1c rose 6 m and 12 m post-derx/ID in both DeRx and Rx cohorts, but most patients maintained HbA1c < 6.5%. HbA1c and body weight measured 6 m and 12 m following derx/ID did not significantly differ between cohorts and were improved at derx/ID and at follow-up intervals compared to pre-CRNT.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate the potential for an alternate therapy, such as CRNT supported via telemedicine, to enable maintenance of weight loss and glycemia below therapeutic targets following discontinuation of GLP-1 therapy.

Durability of Effectiveness Between Users of Once-Weekly Semaglutide and Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors (DPP-4i) in US Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Long-term effectiveness and durability of glucose-lowering medications are important considerations in managing type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to compare durability of treatment efficacy of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide for T2D with that of the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) class.

METHODS

This observational cohort study used 2017-2022 data from the Optum® Clinformatics® Data Mart to compare long-term clinical outcomes associated with semaglutide or DPP-4i in US adults with T2D. The primary outcomes were HbA1c at 2-year follow-up, change in HbA1c from baseline, and the odds of achieving HbA1c targets. BMI at 2-year follow-up, change in BMI from baseline, odds of reducing BMI category, and the need for treatment augmentation were exploratory outcomes. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) weighted descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Weighted HbA1c and BMI cohorts included 865 and 642 semaglutide users and 779 and 537 DPP-4i users, respectively. In the weighted HbA1c cohort, semaglutide and DPP-4i users had an average age of 60 years and similar baseline characteristics including HbA1c level and comorbidity status. Two-year follow-up HbA1c with semaglutide was 0.56% lower than with DPP-4i; reduction in HbA1c from baseline was 0.61% greater. Odds of achieving HbA1c level < 7% were 2.16 times greater after covariate adjustment (all, p < 0.001). Semaglutide was associated with 1.03 kg/m2 greater reduction in BMI and 2.27 times greater odds of reducing BMI category vs DPP-4i (p < 0.001). Semaglutide users were less likely to add new glucose-lowering treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.57; p < 0.001) or initiate insulin (HR 0.49; p < 0.001) vs DPP-4i users.

CONCLUSION

Compared with DPP-4i, semaglutide was associated with lower follow-up HbA1c and BMI, greater reduction in HbA1c and BMI from baseline, and reduced likelihood of requiring treatment augmentation or insulin initiation to manage T2D in US adults, suggesting better durability of semaglutide vs DPP-4i. INFOGRAPHIC.

Randomized open-label trial of semaglutide and dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes of different pathophysiology

The limited understanding of the heterogeneity in the treatment response to antidiabetic drugs contributes to metabolic deterioration and cardiovascular complications1,2, stressing the need for more personalized treatment1. Although recent attempts have been made to classify diabetes into subgroups, the utility of such stratification in predicting treatment response is unknown3. We enrolled participants with type 2 diabetes (n = 239, 74 women and 165 men) and features of severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD) or severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD). Participants were randomly assigned to treatment with the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist semaglutide or the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin for 6 months (open label). The primary endpoint was the change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Semaglutide induced a larger reduction in HbA1c levels than dapagliflozin (mean difference, 8.2 mmol mol-1; 95% confidence interval, -10.0 to -6.3 mmol mol-1), with a pronounced effect in those with SIDD. No difference in adverse events was observed between participants with SIDD and those with SIRD. Analysis of secondary endpoints showed greater reductions in fasting and postprandial glucose concentrations in response to semaglutide in participants with SIDD than in those with SIRD and a more pronounced effect on postprandial glucose by dapagliflozin in participants with SIDD than in those with SIRD. However, no significant interaction was found between drug assignment and the SIDD or SIRD subgroup. In contrast, continuous measures of body mass index, blood pressure, insulin secretion and insulin resistance were useful in identifying those likely to have the largest improvements in glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factors by adding semaglutide or dapagliflozin. Thus, systematic evaluation of continuous pathophysiological variables can guide the prediction of the treatment response to these drugs and provide more information than stratified subgroups ( NCT04451837 ).

Once-weekly semaglutide use in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist naïve patients with type 2 diabetes in North Macedonia: Real-world data from the MIRAGE study

AIMS

The MIRAGE study aimed to evaluate the real-world use of once weekly (OW) subcutaneous semaglutide in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist naïve type 2 diabetes patients in routine clinical practice in North Macedonia.

METHODS

MIRAGE was a multicentre, single-arm, retrospective and 30-weeks study, conducted in North Macedonia. Primary [change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)] and secondary endpoints [change in body weight, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), lipid parameters, blood pressure, waist circumference, glycaemic and weight-loss target achievement] were evaluated between baseline and end of study (EOS).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of 314 patients enrolled in the study were, mean age: 55.5 years, HbA1c: 9.0 %, diabetes duration: 7.8 years, body weight: 105.2 kg and waist circumference: 114 cm. Patients at EOS experienced statistically significant estimated mean change in HbA1c: -2.2 % points, body weight: -9.0 kg, and FPG: -4.1 mmol/L (all p < 0.0001). At EOS, 62.1 % patients achieved HbA1c < 7 %, and 79.3 % had ≥ 1 % HbA1c reduction. A weight reduction of ≥ 3 % and ≥ 5 % was noted in 88.3 % and 73.3 % patients, respectively. No new safety concern has emerged.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from MIRAGE study demonstrated glycaemic and weight-loss benefits of semaglutide, with improvements in other cardiometabolic parameters. The study supports real-world OW subcutaneous semaglutide use in North Macedonia.

Designing a Value-Based Formulary for a Commercial Health Plan: A Simulated Case Study of Diabetes Medications

OBJECTIVES

The healthcare expenditure for managing diabetes with glucose-lowering medications has been substantial in the United States. We simulated a novel, value-based formulary (VBF) design for a commercial health plan and modeled possible changes in spending and utilization of antidiabetic agents.

METHODS

We designed a 4-tier VBF with exclusions in consultation with health plan stakeholders. The formulary information included covered drugs, tiers, thresholds, and cost sharing amounts. The value of 22 diabetes mellitus drugs was determined primarily in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Using pharmacy claims database (2019-2020), we identified 40 150 beneficiaries who were on the included diabetes mellitus medicines. We simulated future health plan spending and out-of-pocket costs with 3 VBF designs, using published own price elasticity estimates.

RESULTS

The average age of the cohort is 55 years (51% female). Compared with the current formulary, the proposed VBF design with exclusions is estimated to reduce total annual health plan spending by 33.2% (current: $33 956 211; VBF: $22 682 576), saving $281 in annual spending per member (current: $846; VBF: $565) and $100 in annual out-of-pocket spending per member (current: $119; VBF: $19). Implementing the full VBF with new cost shares, along with exclusions, has the potential to achieve the greatest savings, compared with the 2 intermediate VBF designs (ie, VBF with prior cost sharing and VBF without exclusions). Sensitivity analyses using various price elasticity values showed declines in all spending outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Designing a VBF with exclusions in a US employer-based health plan has the potential to reduce health plan and patient spending.

Real-world impact of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide after 2 years of follow-up: Results from a nationwide observational study in people with type 2 diabetes

AIM

To investigate the impact of treatment with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), for up to 2 years in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) managed in routine clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was based on data from national registries. People who redeemed at least one prescription of semaglutide and had 2 years of follow-up were included. Data were collected at baseline and after 180, 360, 540 and 720 days of treatment (all timepoints ± 90 days).

RESULTS

In total, 9284 people redeemed at least one semaglutide prescription (intention-to-treat) and 4132 people redeemed semaglutide continuously (on-treatment). For the on-treatment cohort, the median (interquartile range) age was 62.0 (16.0) years, diabetes duration was 10.8 (8.7) years, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level was 62.0 (18.0) mmol/mol at baseline. A subset of the on-treatment cohort, comprising 2676 people, had HbA1c measurements at baseline and at least once during 720 days. The mean (95% confidence interval) changes in HbA1c after 720 days were -12.6 (-13.6; -11.6) mmol/mol (P < 0.001) for GLP-1RA-naïve people, and -5.6 (-6.2; -5.0) mmol/mol (P < 0.001) for GLP-1RA-experienced people. Similarly, 55% of GLP-1RA-naïve people and 43% of GLP-1RA-experienced people reached a HbA1c target of ≤53 mmol/mol after 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

People treated with semaglutide in routine clinical practice experienced clinically relevant and sustained improvements in glycaemic control after 180, 360, 540 and 720 days, irrespective of former GLP-1RA exposure, effects which were comparable with those observed in clinical studies. These results support the use of semaglutide in routine clinical practice for the long-term management of T2D.

Real-world clinical effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of once-weekly (O.W.) semaglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been demonstrated in clinical trials. The aim of this systematic literature review was to summarize real-world evidence for O.W. semaglutide.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scilit databases was performed from January 2017 to June 2022 to identify eligible real-world studies examining O.W. semaglutide in T2DM.

RESULTS

Thirty-one records (18 full-text and 13 abstracts) were identified. The general characteristics of studies and included patients were summarized. Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight were analyzed across studies and according to patient characteristics: baseline HbA1c/weight level, GLP-1 RA-naïve/ GLP-1RA-experienced. The effectiveness of O.W. semaglutide compared with dulaglutide, and the dose of O.W. semaglutide in the real world were also summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic literature review provided complementary evidence to findings from the clinical trials and provided a more comprehensive picture of the use of O.W. semaglutide in routine clinical practice. Results of the review suggested that O.W. semaglutide therapy was associated with improving glycemic control and weight loss in both T2DM patients naïve to GLP-1RA and those previously treated with other GLP-1RA in routine clinical practice.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42022306164.

Effects of semaglutide on cardiovascular risk factors and eating behaviors in type 2 diabetes

AIMS

Aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of once-weekly semaglutide on different end-points indicative of metabolic control, cardiovascular risk, dietary behavior, and treatment satisfaction in T2DM.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study conducted in a diabetes clinic. Changes in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), weight, blood pressure, lipid profile, and number of antihypertensive drugs at 32 weeks (T1) after the first prescription of semaglutide (T0) were analyzed. Furthermore, at T1 patients were asked to fill-in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and the Control of Eating Questionnaire (COEQ).

RESULTS

Overall, 104 patients were identified (mean age 63.6 ± 10.4 years, 58.7% men, diabetes duration 12.7 ± 8.7 years). After 32 weeks of treatment with semaglutide, HbA1c levels were reduced by 1.38%, FBG by - 56.53 mg/dl, weight by 6.03 kg. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total, HDL-, LDL-, and non -HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides significantly improved. The number of glucose-lowering and antihypertensive drugs also decreased. At T1, DTSQ score was 32.23 ± 1.44, whereas COEQ indicated low levels of hunger and good control of eating.

CONCLUSIONS

The study documented benefits of semaglutide on metabolic control and multiple CV risk factors, simplification of therapeutic schemes and high satisfaction with diabetes treatment, and eating behaviors indicative of healthy diet and reduced food intake.

Effectiveness and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Treatment Intensification: A Retrospective Observational Single-Center Study

INTRODUCTION

Once-weekly (OW) glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) semaglutide has been shown to have a more potent glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)-lowering effect than other oral hypoglycemic agents and existing GLP-1RAs in global randomized controlled trials. The study aim was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of OW semaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a real-world clinical setting and identify pre- and post-treatment predictors of good response.

METHODS

We investigated the change in HbA1c, percentage of patients achieving < 7% HbA1c, and factors contributing to the effect 6 months after OW semaglutide use in Japanese patients with T2DM. We also examined differences in effectiveness between patients with different backgrounds.

RESULTS

At baseline, the 77 patients had a mean baseline HbA1c of 8.1% ± 1.23%, 74% of the patients were injecting another GLP-1RA, and 42.9% of the patients were being treated with insulin. HbA1c decreased by 0.89% and by 0.66% in the other GLP-1RA users. The rate of achievement of < 7% HbA1c increased from 21% to 43%. There were no differences in effect by age, sex, or body mass index. Higher baseline HbA1c and shorter duration of diabetes were associated with greater HbA1c reduction. OW semaglutide was tolerable for the majority of our study population.

CONCLUSION

This study provided real-world evidence showing that OW semaglutide significantly reduced HbA1c in Japanese patients with T2DM who had inadequate HbA1c control.

Real-world evaluation of weekly subcutaneous treatment with semaglutide in a cohort of Italian diabetic patients

PURPOSE

Registered trials and real-world evidence (RWE) studies provided evidence on the efficacy of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide on hyperglycaemia and cardiovascular risk factors as add-on or de-novo treatment in type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of electronic data files from 258 T2D patients, this RWE study aimed to explore the impact of OW semaglutide on biochemical and anthropometric outcomes after 6 and 12 months in patients receiving at least one prescription of OW semaglutide between September 2019 and May 2021.

RESULTS

During the study period, 154 and 56 consecutive patients completed the 6 and 12 months of OW semaglutide treatment. HbA1c levels decreased by -1.02±0.1% after 6 months and -1.1±0.1% after 12 months of OW semaglutide (p<0.0001 for both). At these time-points, HbA1c values were <7% in 61% and 57% of cases. HbA1c reduction was greater in patients with higher baseline HbA1c levels and it occurred irrespective of gender, age, insulin therapy and complications. The residual number of cases with HbA1c ≥9% by the study end was low (5.3% vs 18.9% at baseline). Weight loss occurred in 73.5% and 78.1% of cases and, compared to baseline, it was ≥5% in 21.2- 25.4% and ≥10% in 6.8-18.2% after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Significant predictors of HbA1c reduction after 6 months of OW semaglutide treatment were baseline HbA1c (p<0.0001), bodyweight reduction (p<0.0001) and disease duration (p<0.001), while baseline HbA1c was the only predictor of HbA1c response after 12 months (p<0.0001). Reported adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of semaglutide.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world evaluation of weekly subcutaneous treatment with semaglutide in a cohort of Italian diabetic patients.

Injectable semaglutide and reductions in HbA1c and weight in the real world in people switched from alternative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

The ABCD semaglutide audit was designed to capture the routine clinical outcomes of people commenced on semaglutide in the UK. Previous work showed differential reductions in HbA1c and weight dependent on previous glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) exposure. The analysis, in this research letter, shows that decreases in HbA1c and weight associated with semaglutide occur irrespective of previous GLP-1RA use. However, HbA1c reductions were less if switched from dulaglutide or liraglutide and weight changes were attenuated if switched from dulaglutide or exenatide, potentially suggesting differing potencies between GLP-1RAs. Dedicated studies with head-to-head comparisons are needed to confirm these findings.

Real-world use of once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled analysis of data from four SURE studies by baseline characteristic subgroups

INTRODUCTION

This post hoc pooled analysis of four real-world studies (SURE Canada, Denmark/Sweden, Switzerland and UK) aimed to characterize the use of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The Semaglutide Real-world Evidence (SURE) studies had a duration of ~30 weeks. Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) and body weight (BW) were analyzed for the overall population and the following baseline subgroups: GLP-1RA-naïve/GLP-1RA switchers; body mass index <25/≥25-<30/≥30-<35/≥35 kg/m²; age <65/≥65 years; HbA_1c <7%/≥7-≤8%/>8-≤9%/>9%; T2D duration <5/≥5-<10/≥10 years. Data for patients achieving treatment targets were analyzed in the overall population and the baseline HbA_1c ≥7% subgroup.

RESULTS

Of 1212 patients, 960 were GLP-1RA-naïve and 252 had switched to semaglutide from another GLP-1RA. In the overall population, HbA_1c was reduced from baseline to end of study (EOS) by -1.1% point and BW by -4.7 kg; changes were significant for all subgroups. There were significantly larger reductions of HbA_1c and BW in GLP-1RA-naïve versus GLP-1RA switchers and larger reductions in HbA_1c for patients with higher versus lower baseline HbA_1c. At EOS, 52.6% of patients in the overall population achieved HbA_1c <7%. No new safety concerns were identified in any of the completed SURE studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pooled analysis, patients with T2D initiating OW semaglutide showed significant improvements from baseline to EOS in HbA_1c and BW across various baseline subgroups, including patients previously treated with a GLP-1RA other than semaglutide, supporting OW semaglutide use in clinical practice.

TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT03457012; NCT03631186; NCT03648281; NCT03876015.

Effectiveness in Real World of Once Weekly Semaglutide in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonist Naïve or Switchers from Other Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists: Results from a Retrospective Observational Study in Umbria

INTRODUCTION

To complement results of the SUSTAIN program, this study assessed effectiveness and safety of once weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) managed under routine care.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, observational, retrospective study including all patients treated with semaglutide. Changes in clinical outcomes from baseline to 6 and 12 months were assessed in patients who were glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) naïve or switching from another GLP-1RA. Discontinuation rate was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 216 patients (mean age 64 years, 65.7% men) were evaluated: 135 (61.5%) naïve and 81 (38.5%) switchers from another GLP-1RA. In the naïve cohort, after 6 months from semaglutide initiation, levels of HbA1c significantly decreased by - 1.31% (p < 0.0001). All obesity indices improved, with mean reductions in body weight of - 3.92 kg, in BMI of - 1.43 kg/m², and in waist circumference of - 5.03 cm. In the switcher cohort, statistically significant improvements in HbA1c (- 0.78%), body weight (- 2.64 kg), and waist circumference (- 3.03 cm) were obtained after 6 months. Reductions were sustained after 12 months in both cohorts (mean semaglutide dose: 0.86 mg in naïve and 0.96 mg in switcher cohort). Blood pressure and lipid profile mean levels decreased after 12 months from semaglutide initiation in both cohorts. No severe hypoglycemia occurred; 6.5% of patients discontinued semaglutide (2.8% due to gastrointestinal side effects).

CONCLUSION

Effectiveness and tolerability of semaglutide have been confirmed in the real world irrespective of diabetes duration and severity. As expected, more marked reductions in HbA1c and obesity indices were obtained in naïve patients, but it is noteworthy that relevant improvements were also obtained in patients already treated with GLP-1RAs.

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Once-Weekly GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Clinical Practice: A Focus on Switching Between Once-Weekly Molecules in Type 2 Diabetes

AIMS

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (OW GLP-1RAs) and to assess the clinical benefits of switching from one GLP-1RA to another (switchers) in a routine clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, real-world cohort study, based on electronic medical records utilized in one Italian diabetes clinic. Estimated mean changes in HbA1c and body weight after 6 and 12 months from the first prescription of a long-acting GLP1-RA were evaluated using longitudinal linear mixed models for repeated measures. The effectiveness of the three long-acting GLP1-RAs was compared separately in the GLP1-RA naive and switchers cohorts, after propensity score adjustment.

RESULTS

Initiating a long-acting GLP1-RA was associated with statistically significant improvements in HbA1c (-1%) and body weight (-2.6 kg) after 6 months, and benefits were maintained after 12 months. In GLP1-RA naive cohort, semaglutide showed the largest effect on HbA1c (-1.55%; 95%CI, -1.77;-1.34) and body weight (-3.76 kg; 95%CI, -5.05;-2.47) at 6 months, maintained at 12 months (-1.55%; 95%CI, -1.82;-1.28 and -6.29 kg; 95%CI, -7.94;-4.63). In the switchers' cohort, statistically significant reductions at 6 months in HbA1c and body weight were documented with semaglutide and dulaglutide only, with semaglutide associated with the most marked reduction (-0.84%; 95%CI, -1.03;-0.65 and -3.43 kg; 95%, -4.67;-2.19). Dropout rates were 9.2%, 28.5%, and 41.7% in semaglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness and tolerability of the OW GLP-1RAs in the real world were documented. Semaglutide was associated with the highest response without impact on safety. Clinical improvements were obtained even in switchers, especially in those switching to semaglutide.

Real world effectiveness of subcutaneous semaglutide in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective, cohort study (Sema-MiDiab01)

INTRODUCTION

Aim of the present study was to evaluate the real-world impact of once-weekly (OW) subcutaneous semaglutide on different end-points indicative of metabolic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study conducted in 5 diabetes clinics in Italy. Changes in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), body weight, blood pressure, lipid profile, renal function, and beta-cell function (HOMA-B) during 12 months were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 594 patients (97% GLP-1RA naïve) were identified (mean age 63.9 ± 9.5 years, 58.7% men, diabetes duration 11.4 ± 8.0 years). After 6 months of treatment with OW semaglutide, HbA1c levels were reduced by 0.90%, FBG by 26 mg/dl, and body weight by 3.43 kg. Systolic blood pressure, total and LDL-cholesterol significantly improved. Benefits were sustained at 12 months. Renal safety was documented. HOMA-B increased from 40.2% to 57.8% after 6 months (p<0.0001).

DISCUSSION

The study highlighted benefits of semaglutide on metabolic control, multiple CV risk factors, and renal safety in the real-world. Semaglutide seems to be an advisable option for preservation of β-cell function and early evidence suggests it might have a role in modifying insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), the pathogenetic basis of prediabetes and T2D.