Switch-to-Semaglutide Study (STS-Study): a Retrospective Cohort Study

Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Tirzepatide, a once-weekly glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity, showed clinically meaningful reductions in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body weight in the SURPASS phase 3 clinical trial program.

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy and safety of escalation of dulaglutide dose versus switching to tirzepatide in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 4 trial (SURPASS-SWITCH [A Phase 4, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Weekly Dulaglutide to Weekly Tirzepatide in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes], ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05564039).

SETTING

38 sites across 5 countries.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with HbA1c 7.0% or greater to 9.5% or less, stable body weight, body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or greater, receiving a stable dose of dulaglutide (0.75 or 1.5 mg) for at least 6 months and 0 to 3 oral antihyperglycemic medications for at least 3 months.

INTERVENTION

Escalation of dulaglutide to 4.5 mg or maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or switching to tirzepatide.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary end point was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 40. The key secondary end point was change from baseline in weight at week 40.

RESULTS

A total of 282 adults were randomly assigned to tirzepatide (n = 139) or dulaglutide (n = 143). Change from baseline in HbA1c at week 40 was -1.44% (SE, 0.07) with tirzepatide, 15 mg or MTD, and -0.67% (SE, 0.08) with dulaglutide, 4.5 mg or MTD (estimated treatment difference, -0.77% [95% CI, -0.98% to -0.56%; P < 0.001]). Change from baseline in weight at week 40 was -10.5 kg (SE, 0.5) with tirzepatide and -3.6 kg (SE, 0.5) with dulaglutide (estimated treatment difference, -6.9 kg [CI, -8.3 to -5.5 kg; P < 0.001]). Serious adverse events were reported by 10 (7.2%) tirzepatide and 10 (7.0%) dulaglutide participants. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea and diarrhea.

LIMITATION

Open-label design.

CONCLUSION

In SURPASS-SWITCH, switching treatment to tirzepatide provided additional HbA1c reduction and weight loss compared with escalating treatment with dulaglutide.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Eli Lilly and Company.

Long-Term Clinical and Economic Effects of Switching to Once-Weekly Semaglutide from Other GLP-1 RAs Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China: A Modeling Projection Study

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies, using clinical trial data, demonstrated that once-weekly (OW) semaglutide is dominant versus other glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in China. This study aims to evaluate the long-term clinical and economic effects of switching to OW semaglutide from other GLP-1 RAs among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in China.

METHODS

The Institute of Health Economics Diabetes Cohort Model (IHE-DCM) was used to project life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and total direct medical cost over 40 years from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. Baseline characteristics, clinical effectiveness, and the treatment dose of OW semaglutide were derived from previously real-world studies. Patients were assumed to switch to semaglutide or continue previous GLP-1 RAs for 3 years and change to intensive therapy. Drug prices were based on the median bidding price in January 2024 in China. Costs of other GLP-1 RAs were calculated on the basis of their market share in China. All costs were accounted as 2023 Chinese yuan (CNY). A discount of 5% was applied. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to test the robustness of the base-case result.

RESULTS

The results show that switching to OW semaglutide from other GLP-1 RAs among patients with T2DM in China can improve life expectancy by 0.02 years and afford an additional 0.12 QALYs per patient. Meanwhile, switching to OW semaglutide is associated with decreased total lifetime direct medical costs of 4204 CNY per patient, mainly resulting from savings in microvascular costs (2214 CNY) and macrovascular costs (1228 CNY). Sensitivity analyses show the robustness of modeling projection findings.

CONCLUSION

Based on real-world data from China, this modeling projection study demonstrates that switching to OW semaglutide from other GLP-1 RAs can have better clinical and economic effects for patients with T2DM in China, indicating it as a dominant treatment choice.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist-Experienced Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Switching to Once-Weekly Semaglutide in a Real-World Setting: SURE Program Post Hoc Analysis

INTRODUCTION

To investigate outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes who switched to once-weekly (OW) semaglutide from another glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) in clinical practice.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis used data from the SemaglUtide Real-world Evidence (SURE) program, which included nine observational studies investigating the initiation of OW semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice. Using a random coefficient-adjusted mixed model for repeated measurements, changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, and body mass index were analyzed for GLP-1RA-experienced patients who had at least one documented HbA1c value within the 12 weeks before switching to OW semaglutide. In addition, descriptive statistics were used for HbA1c, body weight target achievement, and safety data.

RESULTS

Of the 3,505 patients included in the nine SURE studies, 651 switched to OW semaglutide from another GLP-1RA. GLP-1RA-experienced patients who switched to OW semaglutide demonstrated a 0.67%-point [95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.74; - 0.60, p < 0.0001] reduction in HbA1c, and a 3.69-kg [95% CI - 3.98; - 3.41, p < 0.0001] reduction in body weight over 30 weeks. A body weight reduction of ≥ 5% was achieved by 27.6% of patients, and 33.3% of patients with baseline HbA1c ≥ 7% achieved HbA1c < 7% at end of study. No new safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from this post hoc analysis suggest that, for those not adequately responding to treatment with other GLP-1RAs, switching to OW semaglutide could provide additional glycemic and weight benefits with the convenience of an OW dosing regimen.

REAL life study of subcutaneous SEMaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes in SPain: Ambispective, multicenter clinical study. Results in the GLP1-experienced cohort

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of switching to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were previously treated with other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in a real-world setting in Spain.

METHODS

The REAL Life study of SEMaglutide in Patients with Type 2 diabetes in Spain (REALSEM-SP) was conducted in four endocrinology departments in Madrid, Spain. Adult patients with T2DM who were prescribed once-weekly (OW) subcutaneous semaglutide and had been previously treated with other GLP-1 RAs were included. Baseline characteristics, including demographic, anthropometric, and laboratory variables, were recorded at baseline and at 6 ± 3 and 12 ± 3 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c at 12 ± 3 months of follow-up, with secondary outcomes including changes in weight, BMI, and other glycemic parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 61.6 years and a mean T2DM duration of 11.3 years. The majority of patients had grade 1 or 2 obesity at baseline. Switching to OW-semaglutide was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline to 13 months (-0.35 % ± 0.81). Patients who reached the 1.0 mg OW-dose showed a significant reduction in HbA1c compared to those on the ≤0.5 mg OW-dose. Significant reductions in weight, BMI, and fasting plasma glucose were also observed. Adverse events were mostly gastrointestinal and led to treatment withdrawal in few cases.

CONCLUSION

Switching to OW-subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with T2DM previously treated with other GLP-1 RAs was associated to improvements in glycemic control and weight management in a real-world setting in Spain. These findings support the use of OW-semaglutide as an effective option for patients with T2DM who require additional glycemic control and weight management.

Switching to Tirzepatide 5 mg From Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: Clinical Expectations in the First 12 Weeks of Treatment

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study aimed to describe the clinical course in terms of glycemic outcomes, body weight, and adverse events during the first 12 weeks following a switch from glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) directly to tirzepatide 5 mg.

METHODS

Participants were ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes (T2D), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5% to ≤9.0%, body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 and were on a stable treatment dose of GLP-1 RAs (liraglutide every day [1.2, 1.8 mg], semaglutide once-weekly [0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg], or dulaglutide once-weekly [0.75, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 mg]) for ≥3 months at baseline. The primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline at week 12. Secondary end points included change from baseline in fasting serum glucose, body weight, and glucose assessed by continuous glucose monitoring. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Participants were 58.3 years on average, with baseline HbA1c 7.39%, body mass index 35.18 kg/m2, T2D duration around 12.4 years, and included 55% females. Semaglutide (55%) and dulaglutide (42%) were the most commonly used GLP-1 RAs at baseline with semaglutide 1.0 mg and dulaglutide 1.5 mg being the most common treatment doses. At week 12, mean HbA1c changed from baseline by -0.43%, fasting serum glucose by -7.83 mg/dL, and body weight by -2.15 kg (all P < .01). Glycemic outcomes and body weight improved in participants in all baseline GLP-1 RA subgroups. Twenty participants (13.2%) developed gastrointestinal events. Three (2%) participants discontinued tirzepatide due to adverse events. There were no severe hypoglycemic events or deaths.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, when people with T2D on stable GLP-1 RA treatment were switched directly to tirzepatide 5 mg, they experienced improved glycemic outcomes and additional weight reduction with an acceptable risk of adverse gastrointestinal events over 12 weeks.

Designing a Value-Based Formulary for a Commercial Health Plan: A Simulated Case Study of Diabetes Medications

OBJECTIVES

The healthcare expenditure for managing diabetes with glucose-lowering medications has been substantial in the United States. We simulated a novel, value-based formulary (VBF) design for a commercial health plan and modeled possible changes in spending and utilization of antidiabetic agents.

METHODS

We designed a 4-tier VBF with exclusions in consultation with health plan stakeholders. The formulary information included covered drugs, tiers, thresholds, and cost sharing amounts. The value of 22 diabetes mellitus drugs was determined primarily in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Using pharmacy claims database (2019-2020), we identified 40 150 beneficiaries who were on the included diabetes mellitus medicines. We simulated future health plan spending and out-of-pocket costs with 3 VBF designs, using published own price elasticity estimates.

RESULTS

The average age of the cohort is 55 years (51% female). Compared with the current formulary, the proposed VBF design with exclusions is estimated to reduce total annual health plan spending by 33.2% (current: $33 956 211; VBF: $22 682 576), saving $281 in annual spending per member (current: $846; VBF: $565) and $100 in annual out-of-pocket spending per member (current: $119; VBF: $19). Implementing the full VBF with new cost shares, along with exclusions, has the potential to achieve the greatest savings, compared with the 2 intermediate VBF designs (ie, VBF with prior cost sharing and VBF without exclusions). Sensitivity analyses using various price elasticity values showed declines in all spending outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Designing a VBF with exclusions in a US employer-based health plan has the potential to reduce health plan and patient spending.

Real-world impact of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide after 2 years of follow-up: Results from a nationwide observational study in people with type 2 diabetes

AIM

To investigate the impact of treatment with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), for up to 2 years in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) managed in routine clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was based on data from national registries. People who redeemed at least one prescription of semaglutide and had 2 years of follow-up were included. Data were collected at baseline and after 180, 360, 540 and 720 days of treatment (all timepoints ± 90 days).

RESULTS

In total, 9284 people redeemed at least one semaglutide prescription (intention-to-treat) and 4132 people redeemed semaglutide continuously (on-treatment). For the on-treatment cohort, the median (interquartile range) age was 62.0 (16.0) years, diabetes duration was 10.8 (8.7) years, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level was 62.0 (18.0) mmol/mol at baseline. A subset of the on-treatment cohort, comprising 2676 people, had HbA1c measurements at baseline and at least once during 720 days. The mean (95% confidence interval) changes in HbA1c after 720 days were -12.6 (-13.6; -11.6) mmol/mol (P < 0.001) for GLP-1RA-naïve people, and -5.6 (-6.2; -5.0) mmol/mol (P < 0.001) for GLP-1RA-experienced people. Similarly, 55% of GLP-1RA-naïve people and 43% of GLP-1RA-experienced people reached a HbA1c target of ≤53 mmol/mol after 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

People treated with semaglutide in routine clinical practice experienced clinically relevant and sustained improvements in glycaemic control after 180, 360, 540 and 720 days, irrespective of former GLP-1RA exposure, effects which were comparable with those observed in clinical studies. These results support the use of semaglutide in routine clinical practice for the long-term management of T2D.

Real-world clinical effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of once-weekly (O.W.) semaglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been demonstrated in clinical trials. The aim of this systematic literature review was to summarize real-world evidence for O.W. semaglutide.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scilit databases was performed from January 2017 to June 2022 to identify eligible real-world studies examining O.W. semaglutide in T2DM.

RESULTS

Thirty-one records (18 full-text and 13 abstracts) were identified. The general characteristics of studies and included patients were summarized. Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight were analyzed across studies and according to patient characteristics: baseline HbA1c/weight level, GLP-1 RA-naïve/ GLP-1RA-experienced. The effectiveness of O.W. semaglutide compared with dulaglutide, and the dose of O.W. semaglutide in the real world were also summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic literature review provided complementary evidence to findings from the clinical trials and provided a more comprehensive picture of the use of O.W. semaglutide in routine clinical practice. Results of the review suggested that O.W. semaglutide therapy was associated with improving glycemic control and weight loss in both T2DM patients naïve to GLP-1RA and those previously treated with other GLP-1RA in routine clinical practice.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42022306164.

Real-world evaluation of weekly subcutaneous treatment with semaglutide in a cohort of Italian diabetic patients

PURPOSE

Registered trials and real-world evidence (RWE) studies provided evidence on the efficacy of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide on hyperglycaemia and cardiovascular risk factors as add-on or de-novo treatment in type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of electronic data files from 258 T2D patients, this RWE study aimed to explore the impact of OW semaglutide on biochemical and anthropometric outcomes after 6 and 12 months in patients receiving at least one prescription of OW semaglutide between September 2019 and May 2021.

RESULTS

During the study period, 154 and 56 consecutive patients completed the 6 and 12 months of OW semaglutide treatment. HbA1c levels decreased by -1.02±0.1% after 6 months and -1.1±0.1% after 12 months of OW semaglutide (p<0.0001 for both). At these time-points, HbA1c values were <7% in 61% and 57% of cases. HbA1c reduction was greater in patients with higher baseline HbA1c levels and it occurred irrespective of gender, age, insulin therapy and complications. The residual number of cases with HbA1c ≥9% by the study end was low (5.3% vs 18.9% at baseline). Weight loss occurred in 73.5% and 78.1% of cases and, compared to baseline, it was ≥5% in 21.2- 25.4% and ≥10% in 6.8-18.2% after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Significant predictors of HbA1c reduction after 6 months of OW semaglutide treatment were baseline HbA1c (p<0.0001), bodyweight reduction (p<0.0001) and disease duration (p<0.001), while baseline HbA1c was the only predictor of HbA1c response after 12 months (p<0.0001). Reported adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of semaglutide.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world evaluation of weekly subcutaneous treatment with semaglutide in a cohort of Italian diabetic patients.

Injectable semaglutide and reductions in HbA1c and weight in the real world in people switched from alternative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

The ABCD semaglutide audit was designed to capture the routine clinical outcomes of people commenced on semaglutide in the UK. Previous work showed differential reductions in HbA1c and weight dependent on previous glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) exposure. The analysis, in this research letter, shows that decreases in HbA1c and weight associated with semaglutide occur irrespective of previous GLP-1RA use. However, HbA1c reductions were less if switched from dulaglutide or liraglutide and weight changes were attenuated if switched from dulaglutide or exenatide, potentially suggesting differing potencies between GLP-1RAs. Dedicated studies with head-to-head comparisons are needed to confirm these findings.

Real-world use of once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled analysis of data from four SURE studies by baseline characteristic subgroups

INTRODUCTION

This post hoc pooled analysis of four real-world studies (SURE Canada, Denmark/Sweden, Switzerland and UK) aimed to characterize the use of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The Semaglutide Real-world Evidence (SURE) studies had a duration of ~30 weeks. Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) and body weight (BW) were analyzed for the overall population and the following baseline subgroups: GLP-1RA-naïve/GLP-1RA switchers; body mass index <25/≥25-<30/≥30-<35/≥35 kg/m²; age <65/≥65 years; HbA_1c <7%/≥7-≤8%/>8-≤9%/>9%; T2D duration <5/≥5-<10/≥10 years. Data for patients achieving treatment targets were analyzed in the overall population and the baseline HbA_1c ≥7% subgroup.

RESULTS

Of 1212 patients, 960 were GLP-1RA-naïve and 252 had switched to semaglutide from another GLP-1RA. In the overall population, HbA_1c was reduced from baseline to end of study (EOS) by -1.1% point and BW by -4.7 kg; changes were significant for all subgroups. There were significantly larger reductions of HbA_1c and BW in GLP-1RA-naïve versus GLP-1RA switchers and larger reductions in HbA_1c for patients with higher versus lower baseline HbA_1c. At EOS, 52.6% of patients in the overall population achieved HbA_1c <7%. No new safety concerns were identified in any of the completed SURE studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pooled analysis, patients with T2D initiating OW semaglutide showed significant improvements from baseline to EOS in HbA_1c and BW across various baseline subgroups, including patients previously treated with a GLP-1RA other than semaglutide, supporting OW semaglutide use in clinical practice.

TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT03457012; NCT03631186; NCT03648281; NCT03876015.

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Once-Weekly GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Clinical Practice: A Focus on Switching Between Once-Weekly Molecules in Type 2 Diabetes

AIMS

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (OW GLP-1RAs) and to assess the clinical benefits of switching from one GLP-1RA to another (switchers) in a routine clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, real-world cohort study, based on electronic medical records utilized in one Italian diabetes clinic. Estimated mean changes in HbA1c and body weight after 6 and 12 months from the first prescription of a long-acting GLP1-RA were evaluated using longitudinal linear mixed models for repeated measures. The effectiveness of the three long-acting GLP1-RAs was compared separately in the GLP1-RA naive and switchers cohorts, after propensity score adjustment.

RESULTS

Initiating a long-acting GLP1-RA was associated with statistically significant improvements in HbA1c (-1%) and body weight (-2.6 kg) after 6 months, and benefits were maintained after 12 months. In GLP1-RA naive cohort, semaglutide showed the largest effect on HbA1c (-1.55%; 95%CI, -1.77;-1.34) and body weight (-3.76 kg; 95%CI, -5.05;-2.47) at 6 months, maintained at 12 months (-1.55%; 95%CI, -1.82;-1.28 and -6.29 kg; 95%CI, -7.94;-4.63). In the switchers' cohort, statistically significant reductions at 6 months in HbA1c and body weight were documented with semaglutide and dulaglutide only, with semaglutide associated with the most marked reduction (-0.84%; 95%CI, -1.03;-0.65 and -3.43 kg; 95%, -4.67;-2.19). Dropout rates were 9.2%, 28.5%, and 41.7% in semaglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness and tolerability of the OW GLP-1RAs in the real world were documented. Semaglutide was associated with the highest response without impact on safety. Clinical improvements were obtained even in switchers, especially in those switching to semaglutide.

Real-world use of once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes at an outpatient clinic in Spain

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the use of once-weekly semaglutide in a real population of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in three Spanish hospitals.

METHOD

An observational, retrospective and multicenter clinical study was designed that included 166 participants with T2DM, distinguishing between a group naïve to GLP-1RA (n=72) and another switching from another GLP-1RA (n=94), all managed in the outpatient clinical setting. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to the end of the study. The secondary endpoints included changes in body weight and the proportion of people with T2DM, achieving HbA1c <7.0% and body weight loss >5%.

RESULTS

After 24 months of follow-up, the reductions in HbA1c were -0.91 ± 0.7% (p<0.001) in the total cohort, -1.13 ± 1.38% (p<0.019) for GLP-1RA-naïve participants, and -0.74 ± 0.9% (p<0.023) for GLP-1RA-experienced participants. Body weight reductions were -12.42 ± 9.1% in GLP-1RA-naïve participants vs. -7.65 ± 9.7% in GLP-1RA-experienced participants (p<0.001). In the total cohort, 77.1% reached the objective of an HbA1c level <7%, and 12.7% reached between 7.1% and 7.5%. Additionally, 66.9% achieved a weight reduction ≥5%. Of all cohort, 90% received 1 mg of semaglutide once a week. The reported adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of semaglutide.

CONCLUSIONS

In routine clinical practice in Spain, the use of semaglutide once a week was associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in HbA1c and body weight in a wide range of adults with T2DM, without notable adverse effects, which supports real-world use.

Real-world use of once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: Results from the SURE Switzerland multicentre, prospective, observational study

AIMS

SURE Switzerland (NCT03631186) investigated real-world once-weekly (OW) semaglutide use in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

This multicentre, prospective, observational study enrolled adults with T2D with ≥ 1 documented HbA_1c value ≤ 12 weeks before semaglutide initiation. Primary endpoint was change in HbA_1c from baseline to end of study (EOS; ~30 weeks). Secondary endpoints included changes in body weight (BW) and waist circumference (WC), and the proportion of patients achieving HbA_1c < 8.0%, <7.5% and <7.0% at EOS. Semaglutide dose at EOS was a prespecified exploratory endpoint.

RESULTS

Overall, 214 patients initiated semaglutide (baseline HbA_1c 7.8% [62 mmol/mol], BW 99.9 kg and WC 117.4 cm); 187 attended the EOS visit. At EOS, 175 (81.8%) were still receiving semaglutide (mean [SD] dose 0.78 [0.29] mg); in those patients, mean HbA_1c reduced by -0.8 [95% CI - 1.01;-0.68] %-points (-9 [-11;-7] mmol/mol), BW by -5.0 kg [-5.73;-4.24] and WC by -4.8 cm [-5.75;-3.79] (all p < 0.0001). At EOS, 85.9%, 76.5% and 55.9% patients achieved, respectively, HbA_1c < 8.0%, <7.5% and < 7.0%. No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with T2D in Switzerland initiating OW semaglutide experienced clinically relevant glycaemic control and BW improvements in a real-world setting, supporting semaglutide use in routine clinical practice.