Real-World Experience and Laboratory Monitoring of Dupilumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in a Tertiary Centre

An expert consensus on managing dupilumab-related ocular surface disorders in people with atopic dermatitis 2024

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin condition and affects people of all ages. New therapies, including the monoclonal antibody therapy dupilumab, offer excellent efficacy. However, in clinical trials, and emphasized in real-world observations, an unexpected increased frequency of ocular adverse effects has become apparent. The effectiveness of dupilumab and the unpredictability of ocular adverse effects mean that clinicians need guidance on counselling patients prior to treatment and on managing them if adverse effects arise. The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and Royal College of Ophthalmologists collaborated on this consensus guidance on managing dupilumab-related ocular surface disorders (DROSD). A multidisciplinary group was formed of adult and paediatric dermatologists and ophthalmologists with expertise in DROSD, patient representatives and the BAD Clinical Standards Unit. A literature search was conducted and the results reviewed. All recommendations were reviewed, discussed and voted on. The recommendations pertain to dermatology and ophthalmology management, and apply to people of all ages, unless otherwise stated. Importantly, initiation of dupilumab for AD should not be delayed for most eye disorders except acute new problems (e.g. infections) or potentially severe conditions (e.g. a history of corneal transplant; ophthalmology advice should be sought first). There is insufficient evidence to recommend lubricant drops prophylactically. Dermatologists should assess eye complaints to diagnose DROSD; a severity grading system is provided. DROSD management differs slightly in those aged < 7 years, as ocular complications may affect neuro-ocular development. Therefore, irrespectively of DROSD severity, this population should be referred for ophthalmology advice. In those aged ≥ 7 years, dermatologists should feel confident to trial treatment and reserve ophthalmology advice for severe or nonresponding cases. Discussion about dupilumab withdrawal should be prompted by a significant impact on quality of life, threat to sight, or other complications. Although dupilumab is a highly effective agent for treating AD, the risk of ocular adverse effects should not inhibit clinicians or patients from using it, but clinicians should be aware of them. If a patient develops DROSD, there are clear pathways to assess severity and offer initial management. Where this is ineffective, dermatologists should assess the urgency and seek advice from or initiate referral to ophthalmology. While the evidence reviewed for these guidelines reflects the extensive literature on dupilumab, we believe our advice has relevance for ocular surface disorders in patients with AD treated with tralokinumab and lebrikizumab.

A real-world study of dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis including patients with malignancy and other medical comorbidities

Background

Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (MtS-AD). Various clinical trials have established the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment MtS-AD; however, the real-world experiences of patients treated with dupilumab with malignancy and other comorbidities are lacking.

Objective

To assess the real-life effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of MtS-AD within Canadian adult patient population, including those with other significant comorbidities such as malignancy.

Methods

In this retrospective study, records of adult patients diagnosed with MtS-AD, with a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score of 3 or 4, and treated with dupilumab for 52 weeks were reviewed and collected.

Results

A total of 155 adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with dupilumab were included in the study. Asthma was the most common comorbidity. One hundred twenty-three (80%) patients received either phototherapy and/or at least 1 systemic agent (methotrexate and cyclosporine) before initiation of dupilumab. PGA score of 0 or 1 was achieved by 64% of patients at week 52. Adverse effects including injection site reactions, ocular surface disease, facial and neck redness, and arthropathy occurred in 6%, 10%, 8%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Three patients continued receiving dupilumab throughout pregnancy, all maintaining PGA score of 0 or 1 with no impact on pregnancy, delivery, or the newborn. Twelve patients with prior or active malignancy were included, with no reported negative impact on malignancy.

Conclusion

Dupilumab is an effective and safe option for patients with AD in real life, including patients with malignancy and other medical comorbidities.

Targeted Systemic Therapies for Adults with Atopic Dermatitis: Selecting from Biologics and JAK Inhibitors

Therapeutic options for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy have rapidly expanded in recent years. These new targeted immunomodulatory agents-biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors-have each demonstrated high levels of efficacy and acceptable safety in mostly placebo-controlled clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, but there is no universally applicable algorithm to help choose between them for a given patient. Hence, patients and physicians should utilize shared decision making, discussing efficacy, safety, mode of delivery, monitoring, costs, speed of onset, and other factors to reach individualized treatment decisions. In this review, we try to aid shared decision making by summarizing the efficacy, safety, and monitoring of biologics and oral JAK inhibitors for adults with atopic dermatitis. Network meta-analyses suggest that higher doses of abrocitinib and upadacitinib are more effective than biologics. They also show that, among biologics, dupilumab is likely more effective than tralokinumab and lebrikizumab. Biologics are generally considered safer than JAK inhibitors, although concerns about JAK inhibitors are mainly extrapolated from older generation JAK inhibitors used in higher-risk populations. We also outline evidence and considerations for choosing and using systemic immunomodulatory treatments for special populations including pregnant individuals, those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, end stage kidney disease, and older adults.

Consensus on the therapeutic management of atopic dermatitis ‒ Brazilian Society of Dermatology: an update on phototherapy and systemic therapy using e-Delphi technique

This publication is an update of the "Consensus on the therapeutic management of atopic dermatitis - Brazilian Society of Dermatology" published in 2019, considering the novel, targeted-oriented systemic therapies for atopic dermatitis. The initial recommendations of the current consensus for systemic treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis were based on a recent review of scientific published data and a consensus was reached after voting. The Brazilian Society of Dermatology invited 31 experts from all regions of Brazil and 2 international experts on atopic dermatitis who fully contributed to the process. The methods included an e-Delphi study to avoid bias, a literature search and a final consensus meeting. The authors added novel approved drugs in Brazil and the indication for phototherapy and systemic therapy for AD. The therapeutical response to systemic treatment is hereby reported in a suitable form for clinical practice and is also part of this updated manuscript.

Biologic Versus Small Molecule Therapy for Treating Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Considerations

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of dupilumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis shifted the paradigm from use of broad, systemic immunosuppressants to a safer, targeted treatment and led to the emergence of newer interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 directed biologics and small molecule therapies, namely Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi). Tralokinumab and emerging (not yet approved) lebrikizumab, which both target IL-13, are alternative biologics to dupilumab. The emerging anti-IL-31 receptor nemolizumab is likely to be used second-line to other biologics, primarily for pruritus. Three JAKi are currently in use for treating atopic dermatitis, 2 of which, abrocitinib and upadacitinib, are U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved. This review provides an in-depth, practical discussion on use of these biologics and JAKi that are approved or have completed phase 3 clinical trials in pediatric patients and adults, comparing the groups of medications based on available efficacy and safety data.

Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis in Colombia: Real-life experience

Background

Dupilumab is a treatment approved for uncontrolled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Tropical and developing countries such as Colombia have characteristics that may impact the natural history of AD and access to medical treatments. In that sense, we aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate to severe AD in a Colombian multicenter cohort.

Methods

Multicenter descriptive study that included patients who started treatment between March 2018 and May 2020 in 6 centers. Disease severity was assessed using the following: Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). These measurements were collected according to availability at baseline, 3-5 months, 6-12 months, and more than 12 months. Days of sick leave, hospitalizations, and AD flares before and after dupilumab treatment were reported. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded during follow-up.

Results

Ninety-three patients were included, with a median age of 32 years (IQR: 24.0; 40.0) and a disease evolution time of 21 years (IQR: 16.0; 29.5). 88.2% had at least 1 allergic disease other than AD. An improvement greater than or equal to 75% EASI was observed in 41.7% of patients at 3-5 months, in 73.7% of patients at 6-12 months, and in 75.0% of patients after 12 months. For those reporting SCORAD and POEM, the median percent change ([IQR], n) from baseline in SCORAD was -67.1 ([-79.2; -54.2], n = 16), -70.5 ([-85.8; -47.9], n = 36) and -66.7 ([-77.3; -51.0], n = 13); and POEM, -58.6 ([-66.4; -55.5], n = 4), -73.0 ([-86.5; -66.7], n = 16) and -87.3 ([-93.4; -69.6], n = 8), respectively. Before initiation of dupilumab treatment, 82 (88.2%) patients reported at least 1 flare of AD in the past 12 months. During the follow-up period, 30 (32.3%) patients reported at least 1 exacerbation or flare. Twelve patients (12.9%) presented an AE and 3 (3.2%) patients discontinued dupilumab for this cause.

Conclusions

Dupilumab was effective and safe for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in point-of-care settings, with results similar to randomized controlled and other real-life studies. These positive results are still maintained even though a high number of patients had short interruptions in the use of dupilumab due to administrative problems.

Impact of a Decade of Research Into Atopic Dermatitis

The last decade has seen an unprecedented pace of change, particularly of clinical research in atopic dermatitis (AD). This review summarizes some key discoveries. Over the last 10 years, nearly half of all studies investigated the efficacy and safety of novel therapeutic agents, particularly biologics and small molecules. Clear demonstration of benefit in clinical trials with no significant safety concerns provided strong evidence leading to subsequent Food and Drug Administration approval and routine use of the anti-IL-4 receptor alpha antagonist dupilumab in patients 6 months and older, the selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitors upadacitinib for patients 12 years and older and abrocitinib, the IL-13 antagonist tralokinumab, and the JAK1/2 inhibitor baricitinib for adults 18 years and older. Several other drugs are in the pipeline. Other areas under the spotlight have been trials of skin moisturizers and probiotics in the prevention of AD, investigating the role of filaggrin and skin barrier function and the role of skin and gut microbiome, with Staphylococcus aureus second immunoglobulin-binding protein having been found to uniquely trigger allergic skin responses in AD. Skin microbiome, epidermal metabolites/structural components, and local inflammatory biomarkers are now commonly assessed using genomic and proteomic analysis of tape strips rather than more invasive biopsy to identify factors such as C-C motif chemokine ligand-17 that correlate with disease severity and response to therapy. Overall, the last decade has ushered in a new and exciting era in our understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of this common allergic skin disease.

Total flavonoids of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) improve MC903-induced atopic dermatitis-like lesions

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) is popularly used as a herbal medicine and food additive in the world. Total flavonoids of Hippophae rhamnoides (TFH) are reported to have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activities.

AIM

The effects of TFH on atopic dermatitis (AD)-like lesions induced by MC903 in mice was elucidated in the study.

METHODS

To induce AD-like lesions, MC903 was adopted to apply repeatedly on the left ear in C57BL/6 mice. After induction of AD-like lesions, 0.5% and 1% TFH cream was applied topically on ears of mice once a day for 8 days. The degree of skin lesions was evaluated by macroscopical and histological methods. Expressions of filaggrin (FLG) was evaluated by Western blotting. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was adopted to detect the mRNA expression of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL-4), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in skin lesions. In vitro, Cytokine Antibody Arrays were performed to measure production of cytokines in IFN-γ/TNF-α-treated HaCaT cells, Western blotting was employed to detect the expressions of p-NF-κB, p-ERK and p-P38.

RESULTS

Topical application of TFH significantly improved the severity of dermatitis by inhibiting the infiltration of mast cell, increasing expression of FLG, decreasing the expressions of TNF-α, IL-4, IFN-γ and TSLP in skin lesions. TFH decreased the levels of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, MCP-3, macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB, thymus and activation regulated chemokine (TARC) in the supernatants of the HaCaT cells treated by IFN-γ/TNF-α. Furthermore, expressions of p-NF-κB, p-ERK and p-P38 were also decreased by TFH administration with dose dependent manner in HaCaT cells treated by IFN-γ/TNF-α.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical application of TFH improved AD-like lesions in mice induced by MC903. Which exerted the effects of anti-inflammation and repairing skin barrier by regulating Th1/Th2 balance. This finding indicates that TFH is a novel potential agent for the external treatment of AD.

Facial Erythema in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Dupilumab- A Descriptive Study of Morphology and Etiology

BACKGROUND

The development of dermatitis on face and neck, which was not described in phase 3 clinical trials, has been reported in the literature in patients treated with dupilumab. Little is known regarding the causes or defining features of the facial dermatitis.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted surveys of consecutive patients with AD on dupilumab to describe its clinical features, morphology, and etiology.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. A total of 162 patients under dupilumab treatment were asked to complete a questionnaire and patients were evaluated by dermatologists.

RESULTS

Out of all 162 patients, 137 (84.6%) patients reported pre-existing facial dermatitis prior to dupilumab therapy. 121 (88.3%) patients with pre-existing facial dermatitis reported improvement of their facial dermatitis with dupilumab therapy, 9 (6.6%) patients reported no change after the treatment, and 7 (4.3%) patients of them got worse after the treatment (exacerbation group). Out of 25 patients who reported no pre-existing active facial dermatitis, 6 (24%) patients reported new-onset facial erythema after the starting dupilumab therapy (new-onset group). A large proportion of the patients in both the exacerbation (86%) and new-onset groups (67%) had a history of facial TCS use. Both groups showed similar clinical manifestations and distribution with few differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of patients treated with dupilumab in academic institutions from Korea and U.S. experienced improvement in their facial dermatitis with dupilumab therapy. A small proportion of patients had new onset and exacerbation. Although the mechanisms of this adverse event remains unclear, steroid withdrawal should be considered as a diagnosis of the erythema in some patients.

Real-World Effectiveness of Dupilumab in Atopic Dermatitis Patients: Analysis of an Electronic Medical Records Dataset

Introduction

While the efficacy of dupilumab for the treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has been demonstrated in several clinical trials, patients in such trials may not necessarily reflect the real-world clinical practice setting. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD based on physician global assessment, percent body surface area affected, and patient-reported itch.

Methods

From Modernizing Medicine’s Electronic Medical Assistant dermatology-specific electronic medical records, adults (≥ 18 years) were identified with a diagnosis of AD and ≥ 1 dupilumab prescription (index event) between 1 April 2017 and 31 January 2019. Three cohorts were identified based on 3-month pre-index (1) Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥ 3, (2) an itch severity numerical rating scale (NRS) score ≥ 3, and (3) body surface area (BSA) affected ≥ 10%. Changes from pre-index on the outcome within each cohort were evaluated at 4 months post-index. Patients were also stratified for evaluation of outcomes by baseline demographic (sex, age) and prior AD treatments (topical therapy only or no treatment, any systemic therapy).

Results

More than 70% of the 435 AD patients with baseline IGA score ≥ 3 improved to an IGA score of ≤ 2 at month 4 post-dupilumab initiation, including 42.8% who achieved IGA 0/1 (clear/minimal). Among 112 patients with a pre-index itch severity NRS ≥ 3, scores were reduced from mean (SD) 7.0 (2.4) pre-index to 2.8 (2.8) at month 4 (p < 0.0001); 70.5% of patients had a reduction ≥ 3 points. In the BSA cohort (n = 387), affected BSA was significantly reduced from a pre-index mean (SD) of 39.3% (26.1%) to 16.3% (21.2%) at month 4 (p < 0.0001). Significant improvements in IGA, itch NRS, and BSA were observed regardless of demographic (age and sex) or clinical characteristics such as treatment history (all p < 0.0001 compared with pre-index).

Conclusions

Consistent with outcomes observed in clinical trials, patients treated with dupilumab in real-world clinical settings achieved clinically meaningful improvements in severity and extent of AD and severity of itch comparable to those reported in clinical trials at a similar time point.

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Chinese Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-World Study

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin disease, but treatment of this disease has been challenging. Dupilumab is a new biological agent for AD that has been proven to be safe and effective in clinical trials. Although dupilumab was approved for listing in China in June 2020, real-world data about the application of dupilumab in China are lacking. This study aimed to collect and analyze real-world data on dupilumab among Chinese AD patients.

Methods

Demographic and clinical data for 116 AD patients receiving dupilumab treatment were reviewed. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) of patients were evaluated every 2 weeks from baseline to 16 weeks of treatment. Any adverse events during treatment were recorded.

Results

Among the 116 patients in this study, baseline levels of IgE, eosinophils, and LDH were elevated in 62.79% (n = 86), 45.30% (n = 86), and 54.20% of patients (n = 48), respectively. The SCORAD index and POEM, DLQI, and NRS scores were significantly improved in all patients at 2 weeks (p < 0.0001), 4 weeks (p < 0.01), and 16 weeks (p < 0.001). EASI scores also improved significantly in all patients at 2 weeks (p < 0.01), 4 weeks (> 0.05), and 16 weeks (p < 0.01). However, 11 patients (9.48%) had no response. IgE and LDH levels (p > 0.05), Eosinophil counts (p < 0.01) in blood increased temporarily in the first 4 weeks and then decreased and stabilized during dupilumab treatment. Conjunctivitis was the most common adverse event (2.59%) among the patients. We found that the curative efficacy of dupilumab at 4th weeks was related to the patient’s age and course of disease. Nevertheless, there is no relationship between levels of eosinophils, IgE, LDH and the therapeutic efficacy of dupilumab.

Conclusion

The real-world data in China showed that dupilumab can effectively treat AD and is well tolerated with a low incidence of adverse events.

Dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: Real-world data from the Czech Republic BIOREP registry

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab has been approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis; however, the data in a real-world setting are still limited.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab.

METHODS

This was a real-life Czech multicenter retrospective study from patients treated with dupilumab for severe AD.

RESULTS

A total of 360 patients were included. At 16 weeks, 66.6%, 34.1%, and 5.5% of patients achieved EASI75/90 and EASI100, respectively. Improvement continued with the time, and the proportion of patients with EASI75/90 and EASI100 increased to 89.5%, 55.6%, and 12.9% after one year of treatment and reached 95.8%, 60.4%, and 27.1% in the second year of therapy, respectively. A significant reduction was observed in the DLQI scores. The most common adverse events were infections in 5.8% of patients, followed by ocular complications in 2.5% of patients. Persistence rates were 98.2% at four months to 93.1% at month 24, and lack of effectiveness was the most common reason for discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

This real-life study confirmed the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in a real-life setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study revealed a higher frequency of infections and a lower conjunctivitis frequency than other real-life studies and clinical trials.

Dupilumab ocular side effects in patients with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disorder that most frequently occurs in children, but it can also affect adults. Even though most AD cases can be managed with topical treatments, moderate-to-severe forms require systemic therapies. Dupilumab is the first human monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of AD. Its action is through IL-4 receptor alpha subunit inhibition, thus blocking IL-4 and IL-13 signaling pathways. It has been shown to be an effective, well tolerated therapy for AD, as well as for asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, an increasing incidence of Dupilumab-induced ocular surface disease (DIOSD) has been reported in patients treated with Dupilumab, as compared to placebo. The aim of this study was to summarize scientific data regarding DIOSD in AD patients treated with Dupilumab. A search of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov databases was performed. There was no limit to study design. All AD cases were moderate-to-severe. DIOSD was either dermatologist-, allergist-, or ophtalmologist-assessed. Evidence shows that DIOSD occurs most frequently in patients with atopic dermatitis and not in other skin conditions, neither in patients with asthma, CRSwNP, nor EoE who are on Dupilumab treatment. Further studies are warranted in order to establish a causal relationship between Dupilumab and ocular surface disease. Nevertheless, ophtalmological evaluations prior to Dupilumab initiation can benefit AD patients with previous ocular pathology or current ocular symptomatology. Also, patch testing for ocular allergic contact dermatitis might be advantageous in patients with a history of allergic conjunctivitis. Furthermore, TARC, IgE and circulating eosinophils levels might be important biomarkers for a baseline assessment of future candidates to Dupilumab treatment. However, TARC measurements should be resumed for research purposes only.

Is Dupilumab Effective in Adult-Onset Atopic Dermatitis: Real-life Experience of 16 Patients

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). However, there are few studies demonstrating its efficacy and safety, particularly in the treatment of adult-onset AD.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the real-life experience regarding the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of adult-onset AD.

METHODS

This study is a case series in retrospective design. Patients with the diagnosis of adult-onset AD, using dupilumab at standard dose for at least 3 months were included in the study. Demographic and laboratory data of the cases, data regarding to dupilumab treatment were recorded. The eczema area severity index (EASI) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for itch were used to evaluate treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients, 6 female and 10 male, were included. The median age was 41 years, the median age of the disease onset was 37.5 years, the median duration of the disease was 90 months. The median duration of the dupilumab treatment was 10.5 months. The mean percent reduction from baseline in EASI score was 85.8 ± 12.2 at 3 months, 90.7 ± 9.3 at 6 months, and 93.1 ± 5 at 12 months. The mean percent reduction from baseline in VAS itch score was 82.2 ± 8.6 at 3 months. Acute vestibular neuritis developed in one patient during the dupilumab therapy and resolved with anti-inflammatory therapy.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab seems to be highly effective and safe in the treatment of adult-onset AD. Present study is important as it is the first study to evaluate this patient group specifically.

Dupilumab for atopic dermatitis: a real-world portuguese multicenter retrospective study

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a difficult-to-treat inflammatory skin disease with a high impact on patients' quality of life. Dupilumab, an IL-4 and IL-13 inhibitor, was the first monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD and is currently approved in patients aged 6 or older.Methods: This is a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective, 48-week study designed by the Portuguese Group of AD to assess real-world efficacy and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of AD.Results: A total of 169 patients were enrolled, with a mean disease duration of 22.75 (±11.98) years. The percentage of patients achieving an improvement of at least 75% in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) compared to baseline (EASI75 response) at weeks 12 and 48 was 67.6% and 74.1%, respectively. In the same timepoints, 25.0% and 44.1% achieved an EASI90 response. Patient-reported outcome measures also improved throughout the study period. Regarding safety, 32.0% of the patients developed adverse events, with conjunctivitis (26.6%), persistent facial erythema (4.7%), and arthritis/arthralgia (3.6%) as the more frequently reported.Conclusion: Data from real-world populations are crucial to guide clinicians in their daily decisions. This study provides data demonstrating that dupilumab is an effective and safe therapeutic option for AD.

A Literature Review of Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with pruritus, characterized by recurrent eczema with exacerbations and remissions. AD impairs patients’ QOL and places a heavy burden on patients. Recently, dupilumab, an anti–IL-4Rα antibody, was approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe AD who are refractory to topical agents and/or conventional systemic therapy. Clinical trials of dupilumab for AD demonstrated high efficacy and tolerable safety profiles. Furthermore, real-world evidence of dupilumab for AD is accumulating. Most of these data show favorable effectiveness and safety profile; however, they also clarified issues, including conjunctivitis and facial redness. There are still a certain number of patients with significant failure. In this article, we review real-world evidence of dupilumab for AD, identify concerns specific to dupilumab, and discuss unmet needs and issues to be addressed in the future.

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Clinical Practice: One Year of Experience on 165 Adult Patients from a Tertiary Referral Centre

We have read with great interest the article by Kreeshan et al., which reported data on effectiveness and laboratory safety of dupilumab. We performed a retrospective study including 165 adult patients affected by moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and treated with dupilumab for at least 52 weeks. A significant improvement in eczema area severity index (EASI) score after 16 and 52 weeks of treatment with dupilumab was observed. The mean EASI score at baseline was 28.84 ± 6.4 and significantly reduced to 10.05 ± 8.00 at 16 weeks (p < 0.001), and to 3.04 ± 4.73 at 52 weeks (p < 0.001), with a mean percentage reduction of 65.15% and 89.45%, respectively. Efficacy of dupilumab was demonstrated by a significant reduction of all the scores (P-NRS, S-NRS and DLQI). Furthermore, no patient discontinued the drug because of inefficacy. Fifty-seven out of 165 (34.54%) patients reported at least one adverse event (AE) during the 52-week treatment. Our study confirms that dupilumab can represent a long-term treatment for moderate-to-severe adult AD, beyond 16 weeks. In our experience, dupilumab demonstrated a favourable safety profile at 52 weeks and only a few patients had to discontinue the treatment because of AEs.