Real-Life Data on the Effectiveness and Safety of Cefiderocol in Severely Infected Patients: A Case Series

Addressing carbapenemase-producing extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the potential of cefiderocol and ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam therapy

This study evaluated the activity of cefiderocol and the combination of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) plus aztreonam against carbapenemase-producing extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Nine clinical XDR P. aeruginosa isolates with different sequence types and class A (GES) or B (VIM, IMP or NDM) carbapenemases were analysed. Time-kill assays assessed bacterial load reduction for each treatment, while chemostat experiments on four isolates validated these findings. All isolates showed resistance to CZA, with four also resistant to aztreonam. Seven isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol, but two displayed borderline susceptibility (MIC 2-4 mg/L). Time-kill assays demonstrated bactericidal activity by cefiderocol in six isolates at 24 h, while CZA plus aztreonam showed bactericidal effects in three isolates and synergistic/additive effects in four isolates. In the chemostat model, cefiderocol and CZA plus aztreonam were bactericidal in all four tested isolates, with cefiderocol showing greater bacterial reduction in three of these isolates. Both cefiderocol and CZA plus aztreonam achieved significant reductions in bacterial counts compared to controls, but there was no significant difference between cefiderocol monotherapy and the combination. Both cefiderocol and CZA plus aztreonam demonstrated activity against XDR P. aeruginosa carrying metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) and/or serine-β-lactamase (SBL) carbapenemases. Cefiderocol was the only consistently effective monotherapy with a bactericidal effect across all tested isolates in the chemostat model.

Cefiderocol activity against planktonic and biofilm forms of β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa from people with cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a leading cause of acute pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). Intrinsic antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation complicate treatment. This study investigates the genomic diversity and cefiderocol efficacy against planktonic and biofilm-associated forms of P. aeruginosa isolates from pwCF.

METHODS

Eight P. aeruginosa clinical isolates and three laboratory strains underwent whole genome sequencing (WGS). Biofilm formation was assessed through biomass, cell count, metabolic activity, and extracellular DNA (eDNA). The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC90) and biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC90) were also determined.

RESULTS

WGS revealed significant genomic diversity, identifying ten distinct sequence types (STs). Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) showed that 10/11 strains were susceptible to cefiderocol, with one isolate (MPA9) displaying resistance linked to the blaOXA486 gene. Adding the β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam (AVI) restored susceptibility in this resistant strain. Although iron metabolism genes were highly conserved across isolates, MPA9 lacked the fpvA iron receptor, potentially contributing to cefiderocol resistance. Biofilm formation significantly increased tolerance to cefiderocol, with an 8-fold rise in MBEC90 compared to MBC90.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the genomic diversity and adaptive potential of P. aeruginosa in pwCF. Cefiderocol shows promise against planktonic and biofilm-associated P. aeruginosa, and combining it with AVI may counteract β-lactamase-mediated resistance.

Effectiveness and safety of cefiderocol treatment in patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections in Spain in the early access programme: results of the PERSEUS study

PURPOSE

We assessed the effectiveness and safety of cefiderocol in patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections, excluding Acinetobacter spp., in the early access programme (EAP) in Spain.

METHODS

The retrospective, multicentre PERSEUS study (2018-2022) enrolled hospitalised patients with serious Gram-negative infections, except Acinetobacter spp., who received first-time cefiderocol for ≥ 72 h following requests through the EAP. Clinical cure at end of treatment, all-cause mortality at Day 28, cefiderocol use, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were the key outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 261 patients were eligible for analysis. Median (interquartile range) age was 61 (49-68) years, 202 (77.4%) were male and 165 (63.2%) were in the intensive care unit. The most frequent diagnoses were respiratory tract infection (47.9%), intra-abdominal infection (14.6%), and urinary tract infection (14.6%). The median (IQR) duration of cefiderocol treatment was 10 (7-14) days. Overall, the clinical cure rate was 80.5% (210/261) and the 28-day mortality rate was 21.5% (56/261). In patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (66.7% [n = 174], including 73 [42%] with metallo-β-lactamases), the clinical cure rate was 84.5% (147/174) and the 28-day mortality was 17.2% (30/174). Logistic regression analysis showed that prior antibiotic treatment for > 7 days (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.56) and mechanical ventilation (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.67) were independent negative predictive factors for clinical cure. ADRs occurred in seven patients, six events resolved, and one was fatal (toxic epidermal necrolysis).

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol is a valuable option in the treatment of serious Gram-negative bacterial infections, particularly for those caused by P. aeruginosa.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV: NCT05789199 (Registration date: 16 February 2023).

Cefiderocol Versus Best Available Therapy in the Treatment of Critically Ill Patients with Severe Infections Due to Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of cefiderocol in treating severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) in critically ill patients, particularly those in intensive care units (ICUs).

METHODS

A meta-analysis of studies, including randomized clinical trials and observational studies in adult patients, was performed. Studies with at least 50% of critically ill patients were included. Studies with small sample size or without comparison groups were excluded. Sources included PubMed, Scopus, or Google Scholar, up to 14 August 2024. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane tool. The main outcome examined was 30-day mortality, while secondary outcomes assessed included clinical cure rates and adverse effects. Results were expressed with odds ratios. No funding was received for this study. It was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with reference CRD42024563041.

RESULTS

eight studies, with 1339 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Cefiderocol treatment was associated with a lower 30-day mortality rate than other available therapies (pooled OR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.23-0.97, p = 0.04), particularly in cases of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii infections (pooled OR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14-0.60, p < 0.001). Although there was a non-significant trend toward higher clinical cure rates in the cefiderocol group (OR 1.59; 95% CI: 0.96-2.62, p = 0.07), the drug demonstrated at least non-inferiority when compared to other treatment options. Study limitations included moderate heterogeneity between studies, and a high risk of bias in non-RCT studies. (Five cohort studies were included). Another limitation is that five of the eight studies compared cefiderocol versus colistine, an antibiotic with known toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that cefiderocol is a promising therapeutic option for managing severe MDR-GNB infections in critically ill patients, offering a potential global benefit on mortality and at least non-inferiority in the cure rate when compared with other therapies.

Effectiveness and Safety of Cefiderocol in Clinical Practice for Treatment of Patients with Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: US Interim Results of the PROVE Study

Purpose

The international PROVE retrospective chart-review study aims to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of cefiderocol for treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections.

Patients and Methods

US centers selected hospitalized patients receiving their first cefiderocol treatment for ≥72 hours for a Gram-negative bacterial infection (November 2020-March 2023). Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, hospitalization, course of infection, antibiotic use, clinical cure (excluding patients with a relapse/reinfection), clinical response at the end of treatment, microbiology, in-hospital all-cause mortality (IH-ACM) at Day 30, and safety were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

This interim analysis included 244 patients. The most frequent infection sites were respiratory tract (55.7%), skin and skin structure (16.8%), and blood (9.8%). The median duration of cefiderocol use was 12 days (interquartile range 8-18.5). Clinical cure was reported for 64.8% (158/244) of patients, clinical response for 74.2% (181/244), and 9.4% (23/244) had relapse/reinfection; 30-day IH-ACM was 18.4% (45/244). Of 82 patients with monomicrobial Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, 64.6% (n = 53) and 74.4% (n = 61) had clinical cure and clinical response, respectively, and 30-day IH-ACM was 25.6%. Among 43 patients with monomicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii infections, 60.5% (n = 26) and 74.4% (n = 32) had clinical cure and clinical response, respectively, and 30-day IH-ACM was 18.6%. Five patients experienced six adverse drug reactions (one serious event: interstitial nephritis/acute kidney injury), and cefiderocol was discontinued in two cases.

Conclusion

Cefiderocol had similar clinical cure and response rates to previous retrospective studies and lower mortality. Cefiderocol was well tolerated in real-world settings in critically ill US patients with problematic Gram-negative pathogens.

Use of Cefiderocol in Adult Patients: Descriptive Analysis from a Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05-72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16-0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-β-lactamase producers, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches.

Comparison of Different Methods for Assaying the In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol against Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains: Influence of Bacterial Inoculum

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections represent a critical public health concern, highlighting the need for the development of effective antibiotics. Cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, particularly in strains that are resistant to other drugs. However, concerns regarding the emergence of drug-resistant strains persist. This study, conducted with 109 carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from the Spanish Hospital (Dr. Balmis, Alicante). The study evaluated susceptibility to cefiderocol in comparison to alternative antibiotics and including their susceptibility to bacterial inoculum, while assessing various testing methods. Our findings revealed high susceptibility to cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant strains, with only 2 of 109 strains exhibiting resistance. Comparative analysis demonstrated superiority of cefiderocol towards alternative antibiotics. Both the E-test and disk-diffusion methods showed 100% concordance with the microdilution method in classifying strains as susceptible or resistant. However, 4.6% (5/109) of disc zone diameters fell within the technical uncertainty zone, so the E-test technique was found to be more useful in routine clinical practice. Additionally, escalating bacterial inoculum correlated with decreases in vitro activity, so this parameter should be adjusted very carefully in in vivo studies. This study underscores cefiderocol's potential as a therapeutic option for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. However, the emergence of drug-resistant strains emphasizes the critical need for a wise use of antibiotics and a continuous monitoring of resistance to antibiotics. Based on our in vitro data, further investigation concerning the impact of bacterial inoculum on drug efficacy is warranted in order to detect resistance mechanisms and optimize treatment strategies, thereby mitigating the risk of resistance.

Cefiderocol susceptibility of Achromobacter spp.: study of an accurately identified collection of 230 strains

BACKGROUND

Achromobacter spp. are opportunistic pathogens, mostly infecting immunocompromised patients and patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and considered as difficult-to-treat pathogens due to both intrinsic resistance and the possibility of acquired antimicrobial resistance. Species identification remains challenging leading to imprecise descriptions of resistance in each taxon. Cefiderocol is a broad-spectrum siderophore cephalosporin increasingly used in the management of Achromobacter infections for which susceptibility data remain scarce. We aimed to describe the susceptibility to cefiderocol of a collection of Achromobacter strains encompassing different species and isolation sources from CF or non-CF (NCF) patients.

METHODS

We studied 230 Achromobacter strains (67 from CF, 163 from NCF patients) identified by nrdA gene-based analysis, with available susceptibility data for piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of cefiderocol were determined using the broth microdilution reference method according to EUCAST guidelines.

RESULTS

Strains belonged to 15 species. A. xylosoxidans represented the main species (71.3%). MICs ranged from ≤ 0.015 to 16 mg/L with MIC50/90 of ≤ 0.015/0.5 mg/L overall and 0.125/2 mg/L against 27 (11.7%) meropenem-non-susceptible strains. Cefiderocol MICs were not related to CF/NCF origin or species although A. xylosoxidans MICs were statistically lower than those of other species considered as a whole. Considering the EUCAST non-species related breakpoint (2 mg/L), 228 strains (99.1%) were susceptible to cefiderocol. The two cefiderocol-resistant strains (A. xylosoxidans from CF patients) represented 3.7% of meropenem-non-susceptible strains and 12.5% of MDR strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol exhibited excellent in vitro activity against a large collection of accurately identified Achromobacter strains, irrespective of species and origin.

Antimicrobial and Diagnostic Stewardship of the Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors for Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections are a major public health threat due to the limited therapeutic options available. The introduction of the new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) has, however, altered the treatment options for such pathogens. Thus, four new BL/BLI combinations-namely, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, and ceftolozane/tazobactam-have been approved for infections attributed to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nevertheless, although these antimicrobials are increasingly being used in place of other drugs such as polymyxins, their optimal clinical use is still challenging. Furthermore, there is evidence that resistance to these agents might be increasing, so urgent measures should be taken to ensure their continued effectiveness. Therefore, clinical laboratories play an important role in the judicious use of these new antimicrobial combinations by detecting and characterizing carbapenem resistance, resolving the presence and type of carbapenemase production, and accurately determining the minimum inhibitor concentrations (MICs) for BL/BLIs. These three targets must be met to ensure optimal BL/BLIs use and prevent unnecessary exposure that could lead to the development of resistance. At the same time, laboratories must ensure that results are interpreted in a timely manner to avoid delays in appropriate treatment that might be detrimental to patient safety. Thus, we herein present an overview of the indications and current applications of the new antimicrobial combinations and explore the diagnostic limitations regarding both carbapenem resistance detection and the interpretation of MIC results. Moreover, we suggest the use of alternative narrower-spectrum antibiotics based on susceptibility testing and present data regarding the effect of synergies between BL/BLIs and other antimicrobials. Finally, in order to address the absence of a standardized approach to using the novel BL/BLIs, we propose a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm, which can be modified based on local epidemiological criteria. This framework could also be expanded to incorporate other new antimicrobials, such as cefiderocol, or currently unavailable BL/BLIs such as aztreonam/avibactam and cefepime/taniborbactam.

Cefiderocol: early clinical experience for multi-drug resistant gram-negative infections

Multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria present a significant global health threat. Cefiderocol (CFDC), a siderophore cephalosporin, has shown potential in combating this threat, but with the currently available data, its role in therapy remains poorly defined. This multi-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated the real-world application of CFDC across six U.S. medical centers from January 2018 to May 2023. Patients aged ≥18 years and who had received ≥72 hours of CFDC were included. The primary outcome was a composite of clinical success: survival at 30 days, absence of symptomatic microbiologic recurrence at 30 days following CFDC treatment initiation, and resolution of signs and symptoms. Secondary outcomes included time to CFDC therapy and on-treatment non-susceptibility to CFDC. A total of 112 patients were included, with median (interquartile range [IQR]) APACHE II scores of 15 (19-18). Clinical success was observed in 68.8% of patients, with a mortality rate of 16.1% and comparable success rates across patients infected with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections. The most common isolated organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (61/112, 54.5%, of which 55/61 were carbapenem-resistant) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (32/112, 28.6%). Median (IQR) time to CFDC therapy was 77 (14-141) hours. Two patients experienced a non-anaphylactic rash as an adverse drug reaction. On-treatment non-susceptibility to CFDC was found in six patients, notably due to P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii.IMPORTANCECFDC was safe and clinically effective as a monotherapy or in combination in treating a variety of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

An overview of gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance: definition, prevalence, and treatment options

INTRODUCTION

Difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) is a newly proposed resistance phenotype characterized by resistance to all first-line drugs. The emergence of DTR as a new resistance phenotype has significant implications for clinical practice. This new concept has the potential to be widely used instead of traditional phenotypes.

AREAS COVERED

This study carried out a detailed analysis about the definition, application, and evolution of various resistance phenotypes. We collected all the research articles on Gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance (GNB-DTR), analyzed the DTR in each region and each bacterial species. The advantages and doubts of DTR, the dilemma of GNB-DTR infections and the potential therapeutic strategies are summarized in the review.

EXPERT OPINION

Available studies show that the prevalence of GNB-DTR is not optimistic. Unlike traditional resistance phenotypes, DTR is more closely aligned with the clinical treatment perspective and can help with the prompt selection of an appropriate treatment plan. Currently, potential treatment options for GNB-DTR include a number of second-line drugs and novel antibiotics. However, the definition of first-line drugs is inherently dynamic. Therefore, the DTR concept based on first-line drugs needs to be continuously updated and refined, considering the emergence of new antibiotics, resistance characteristics, and pathogen prevalence in different regions.

Treatment of critically ill patients with cefiderocol for infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens: review of the evidence

Appropriate antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with serious Gram-negative infections in the intensive care unit is crucial to minimize morbidity and mortality. Several new antibiotics have shown in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefiderocol is the first approved siderophore beta-lactam antibiotic with potent activity against multidrug-resistant, carbapenem-resistant, difficult-to-treat or extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, which have limited treatment options. The spectrum of activity of cefiderocol includes drug-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter spp. and Burkholderia spp. and CRE that produce serine- and/or metallo-carbapenemases. Phase 1 studies established that cefiderocol achieves adequate concentration in the epithelial lining fluid in the lung and requires dosing adjustment for renal function, including patients with augmented renal clearance and continuous renal-replacement therapy (CRRT); no clinically significant drug-drug interactions are expected. The non-inferiority of cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem in all-cause mortality (ACM) rates at day 14 was demonstrated in the randomized, double-blind APEKS-NP Phase 3 clinical study in patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, the efficacy of cefiderocol was investigated in the randomized, open-label, pathogen-focused, descriptive CREDIBLE-CR Phase 3 clinical study in its target patient population with serious carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, including hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia, bloodstream infection/sepsis, or complicated urinary tract infections. However, a numerically greater ACM rate with cefiderocol compared with BAT led to the inclusion of a warning in US and European prescribing information. Cefiderocol susceptibility results obtained with commercial tests should be carefully evaluated due to current issues regarding their accuracy and reliability. Since its approval, real-world evidence in patients with multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections suggests that cefiderocol can be efficacious in certain critically ill patient groups, such as those requiring mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia with subsequently acquired Gram-negative bacterial superinfection, and patients with CRRT and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In this article, we review the microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety profiles and real-world evidence for cefiderocol, and look at future considerations for its role in the treatment of critically ill patients with challenging Gram-negative bacterial infections.