Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Risankizumab in Psoriasis Patients

Disease Modification in Psoriasis: Future Prospects for Long-Term Remission

A subset of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis show long-term remission after drug withdrawal lasting well beyond several half-life times of the drug, particularly following effective treatment with modern biologics such as interleukin-23 inhibitors. Furthermore, evidence suggests that the development of comorbidities, including psoriatic arthritis, a key comorbidity causing irreversible damage, can be prevented or delayed in a subgroup of patients with psoriasis receiving these therapies. This implies that psoriasis treatments may alter the underlying disease mechanisms in some individuals, extending beyond their direct pharmacological effects. However, this concept of disease modification remains controversial, as predicting the natural clinical course of an individual patient with psoriasis is challenging, and typically, no permanent clinically detectable changes occur in psoriatic skin inflammation. This article aims to provide an overview of the current evidence on disease modification in psoriasis and discusses clinical and molecular markers that could be used to predict or monitor disease modification in psoriasis.

Revisiting risankizumab: a newer biologic drug in dermatology

INTRODUCTION

Risankizumab is an interleukin 23p19 inhibitor, approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Apart from its utility in psoriasis, there are a number of other dermatologic conditions where risankizumab has demonstrated value. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the utility of risankizumab in psoriasis, as well as its implication in off-label dermatologic disorders.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and ResearchGate were searched for scholarly articles related to risankizumab and its utility in dermatology using the search terms "Risankizumab" AND "Psoriasis" AND "other dermatological disorders."

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Risankizumab is a valuable biologic agent for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthropathy. It has also been used successfully for other dermatologic disorders like hidradenitis suppurativa, pityriasis rubra pilaris and pyoderma gangrenosum.

CONCLUSIONS

Risankizumab's usage is not limited to psoriasis. Its benefit extends to many more dermatologic conditions. Besides, it has an acceptable safety profile.

Mirikizumab Exposure-Response Relationships in Patients with Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in Randomized Phase II and III Studies

Mirikizumab is a humanized anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody being developed for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease. We characterized the relationship of mirikizumab systemic exposure with efficacy and safety end points in patients with UC using phase II (NCT02589665) and III (NCT03518086, NCT03524092) trial data. Exposure-response models were developed for clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic remission, and change in modified Mayo score following induction (50-1,000 mg i.v. every 4 weeks) and maintenance (200 mg s.c. every 4 or 12 weeks) treatment. These models evaluated observed and pharmacokinetic model-predicted mirikizumab exposures as the exposure measure. Key safety event rates were compared across mirikizumab exposure quartiles in the phase III trial. Mirikizumab efficacy in patients with UC showed an apparent positive association with systemic exposure following both induction and maintenance. However, further analysis found this relationship to be overstated by the presence of confounding factors that were not among the tested patient covariates. While prior biologic experience and baseline disease severity showed statistically significant influences on estimated placebo effect, no patient factors affected the mirikizumab effect parameters in any of the phase III exposure-response models. There was no apparent mirikizumab concentration relationship with any adverse event of special interest. When the phase II and III data and confounding are considered together, efficacy was unlikely to be strongly affected by variation in exposures across individual patients at the phase III dose. Together with the previously demonstrated mirikizumab exposure insensitivity to patient factors, these findings indicate that mirikizumab dose adjustment to patient characteristics is not required.

Inter-Antibody Variability in the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Antibodies Characterized Using Population Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling

The objective of this work was to develop a population physiologically based pharmacokinetic (popPBPK) model to characterize the variability in the clinical PK of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) following intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) administration. An extensive literature search was conducted and clinical PK data for FDA-approved as well as non-approved mAbs were collected. Training and validation datasets of 44 and 9 mAbs exhibiting linear pharmacokinetics were used for model development. The variability in antibody PK was captured by accounting for different rate constants of pinocytosis (CLup) and intracellular degradation (kdeg) for different mAbs. Typical values for CLup and kdeg and their respective inter-antibody variabilities (ωClup, ωKdeg) were estimated to be 0.32 L/h/L and 26.1 h-1 (73% and 46%). Varied absorption profiles following SC dosing were characterized by incorporating inter-antibody variability in local degradation (kSC) and rate of lymphatic uptake (S_Lu) of mAbs. Estimates for typical kSC and S_Lu values, and ωKsc,ωS_Lu, were found to be 0.0015 h-1 and 0.54 (193%, and 49%). FDA-approved mAbs showed less local degradation (0.0014 h-1 vs. 0.0038 h-1) compared with other clinically tested mAbs, whereas no substantial differences in physiological processes involved in disposition were observed. To evaluate the generalizability of estimated PK parameters and model validation, the final popPBPK model was used to simulate the range of expected PK for mAbs following SC administration of nine different mAbs that were not used for model-building purposes. The predicted PK of all nine mAbs was within the expected range specified a priori. Thus, the popPBPK model presented here may serve as a tool to predict the clinical PK of mAbs with linear disposition before administering them to humans. The model may also support preclinical-to-clinical translation and 'first-in-human' dose determination for mAbs.

Novel Pharmaceuticals and Therapeutics for Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha-Resistant Crohn's Disease: A Narrative Review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a medical condition that causes persistent, relapsing inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. It is an umbrella term encompassing two different conditions: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). The standard treatment for patients with moderate to severe CD is tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors; however, a subset of CD patients face challenges in regard to this disease's treatment. Certain populations of patients with CD may exhibit resistance or develop tolerance to TNF-α inhibitor therapy over time. The recurrent gastrointestinal inflammation associated with CD can severely impact the quality of life and lead to complications for those suffering from this condition. The symptomatic flare-ups these subpopulations continue to experience underscores why such a need for alternative therapies is desperately needed. These alternative therapies not only offer potential benefits for those with TNF-α resistance, but CD may also serve as a superior therapy option for those trying to avoid the adverse effects of CD treatments available today. This review aims to explore and investigate the novel drugs and therapies that are being investigated for the treatment of TNF-α resistant CD, such as upadacitinib, risankizumab, vedolizumab, synbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and stem cell therapy. Upadacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor, Risankizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23, and Vedolizumab is an integrin receptor antagonist. The latest advancements in CD management have shown encouraging results. Some of these novel drugs and therapies not only offer a potential solution for CD patients exhibiting resistance to TNF-α inhibitors but may also provide a superior alternative for individuals prone to opportunistic infections.

Weighted Breaths: Exploring Biologic and Non-Biologic Therapies for Co-Existing Asthma and Obesity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the effectiveness of biologics, some of which comprise the newest class of asthma controller medications, and non-biologics in the treatment of asthma co-existing with obesity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our review of recent preliminary and published data from clinical trials revealed that obese asthmatics respond favorably to dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab, and tezepelumab, which are biologics currently indicated as add-on maintenance therapy for severe asthma. Furthermore, clinical trials are ongoing to assess the efficacy of non-biologics in the treatment of obese asthma, including a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, a Janus kinase inhibitor, and probiotics. Although many biologics presently indicated as add-on maintenance therapy for severe asthma exhibit efficacy in obese asthmatics, other phenotypes of asthma co-existing with obesity may be refractory to these medications. Thus, to improve quality of life and asthma control, it is imperative to identify therapeutic options for all existing phenotypes of obese asthma.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Biologic and Small-Molecule Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, necessitates long-term medical therapy to manage symptoms and prevent complications. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a strategy to optimize treatment efficacy, particularly with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) alpha drugs. This review explores the role of TDM for non-anti-TNF advanced therapies in IBD, focusing on vedolizumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, risankizumab and ozanimod. Methods: The literature search, conducted through OVID (Medline) and PubMed, delves into proactive versus reactive TDM, timing of monitoring and methods for measuring drug levels and anti-drug antibodies. Results: While ustekinumab and vedolizumab exhibit exposure-response relationships, consensus on target levels and the role of TDM adjustments remains elusive. Limited data on risankizumab suggest a dose-dependent response, while for small molecule therapies (janus kinase inhibitors and ozanimod), the absence of real-world data and commercially available TDM tools pose challenges. Conclusion: At present, with the available data, there is a limited role for TDM in non-anti-TNF biologic and small-molecule therapies. This review underscores the need for further research to delineate the utility of TDM in guiding treatment decisions for these agents.

Risankizumab: Mechanism of action, clinical and translational science

Risankizumab is a high-affinity neutralizing anti-interleukin (IL)-23 monoclonal antibody marketed in over 40 countries across the globe to treat several inflammatory diseases, such as plaque psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and Crohn's disease (CD). This paper reviews the regulatory approval, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics (PKs)/pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and clinical efficacy and safety data for risankizumab, focusing on the three main approved indications. Risankizumab binds to the p19 subunit of IL-23 and inhibits IL-23 from interacting with the IL-23 receptor and subsequent signaling. Biomarker data obtained following treatment with risankizumab in multiple indications provided supportive evidence for downstream blockade of IL-23 signaling associated with disease pathology. The PKs of risankizumab is linear and time-independent, consistent with typical IgG1 monoclonal antibodies, across all evaluated indications. Risankizumab exhibited positive exposure-response relationships for efficacy with no apparent exposure-dependent worsening in safety. Immunogenicity to risankizumab had no major clinical consequences for either efficacy or safety. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab have been established in PsO, PsA, and CD in the pivotal clinical trials where superior benefit/risk profiles were demonstrated compared to placebo and/or active comparators. Moreover, safety evaluations in open-label extension studies following long-term treatment with risankizumab showed stable and favorable safety profiles consistent with shorter-term studies. These data formed the foundation for risankizumab's marketing approvals to treat multiple inflammatory diseases across the globe.

Evaluation of Truncated AUC as an Alternative Measure to Assess Pharmacokinetic Comparability in Bridging Biologic-Device Using Prefilled Syringes and Autoinjectors

Pharmacokinetic (PK) comparisons between therapeutic biologics have largely been based on the total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration (Cmax ). For biologics with a long half-life, a PK comparability study may be long in duration and costly to conduct. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether a truncated AUC (tAUC) can be used to assess PK comparability when bridging prefilled syringe (PFS) and autoinjector (AI) treatment options for biologics with a long half-life. Fifteen biologics license applications (BLAs) were included to determine the concordance and geometric percent coefficient of variation (%CV) between tAUCs evaluated on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 and AUC evaluated to infinity (AUC0-inf ). Concordance is established if the tAUCs are comparable with AUC0-inf . Trial simulation was performed to examine the effect of the absorption rate constant (ka ) and sample size on the concordance of tAUCs. The tAUCs evaluated on day 14, 21, and 28 had 100% concordance with AUC0-inf for all 15 BLAs. The concordance of tAUC evaluated at day 7 was 87.5%. Based on the trial simulation, tAUC evaluated to day 28 post-dose can achieve high concordance (≥85%) for biologics exhibiting linear or nonlinear elimination with a ka of ≥0.1/day and with a sample size of 70 subjects per arm. tAUC appears to be a promising alternative PK measure, relative to AUC0-inf , for PK comparability assessments.

Long-term safety and efficacy of risankizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Interim analysis of the LIMMitless open-label extension trial up to 5 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease often requiring long-term therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of risankizumab in patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

LIMMitless is an ongoing phase 3, open-label extension study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of continuous risankizumab 150 mg every 12 weeks for adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis following multiple phase 2/3 base studies. This interim analysis assessed safety (ie, monitored treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) through 304 weeks. Efficacy assessments included determining the proportion of patients who achieved ≥90% or 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100), static Physician's Global Assessment of clear/almost clear (sPGA 0/1), and Dermatology Life Quality Index of no effect on patient's life (DLQI 0/1) through 256 weeks.

RESULTS

Among 897 patients randomized to risankizumab in the base studies, 706 were still ongoing at data cutoff. Rates of TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and TEAEs of safety interest were low. At week 256, 85.1%/52.3% of patients achieved PASI 90/100, respectively, 85.8% achieved sPGA 0/1, and 76.4% achieved DLQI 0/1.

LIMITATIONS

Open-label study with no placebo or active-comparator group.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term continuous risankizumab treatment for up to 5 years was well tolerated and demonstrated high and durable efficacy.

Blocking interleukin-17 in psoriasis: Real-world experience from the PsoPlus cohort

BACKGROUND

Real-world studies on the use of biologics in psoriasis (Pso) are increasing, but still scarce. Trough concentrations (C_t s) of interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) seem promising for clinical decision-making, but their value in daily practice has yet to be proven.

OBJECTIVES

To report on IL-17i effectiveness, treatment modifications and C_t use in our clinic.

METHODS

Data were collected from IL-17i-treated Pso patients followed up in the PsoPlus clinic at the Dermatology department, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients were included, counting for 134 IL-17i courses (secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab). Fifty-five per cent of the patients were bio-naive prior to IL-17i initiation. During maintenance, merely 97.0% and 77% achieved near-complete and complete skin clearance, respectively. Major reasons for treatment modification were suboptimal response (63.0%) and safety issues (9.3%). Reported modifications were switch (25.4%), dose escalation (11.9%), dose de-escalation (6.7%), treatment association (6.0%) and IL-17i stop (3.0%). Overall drug survival was 69.0 months, without difference between the different IL-17i (p = 0.078). Ixekizumab tended to have the highest survival. Drug survival was higher in bio-naive subjects compared to bio-experienced subjects (p = 0.011). C_t was measured in 20 patients and interpreted post hoc. In 85%, the clinical decision was in accordance with the C_t (e.g. substantiated need for dose escalation). For the other cases, the C_t would have led to another clinical decision if known at that time.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study showed that IL-17i are very effective drugs for Pso, with ixekizumab as leading biologic. Prior bio-experience seemed to impact IL-17i drug survival. Treatment modifications were mainly performed in case of insufficient response, primarily via switch and dose escalation, and least frequently in ixekizumab patients. C_t might rationalize clinical decision-making; however, there is need for standardized algorithms to corroborate its use.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses for Risankizumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Risankizumab is an anti-IL23 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This work characterizes the pharmacokinetics of risankizumab in PsA compared with psoriasis and evaluates the efficacy and safety exposure-response relationships in PsA.

METHODS

The population pharmacokinetic analyses included data from 1527 participants that originated from one phase 1 healthy participant study, one phase 2 dose-ranging study in patients with PsA with an open-label extension study, and two pivotal phase 3 studies in patients with PsA, where the clinical regimen of risankizumab 150 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) at weeks 0, 4, and every 12 weeks thereafter was compared with placebo. Pharmacokinetics were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Simulation analyses using the final model were conducted to evaluate the impact of covariates on exposure. Data from 1407 patients with PsA from the phase 3 studies were included in the exposure-response analyses. Graphical analyses were used to evaluate efficacy and safety exposure-response relationships, and logistic regression was conducted for further assessment of efficacy exposure-response relationships.

RESULTS

Risankizumab pharmacokinetics were well described by a two-compartment model with first-order SC absorption and elimination. None of the evaluated covariates showed clinically relevant impact on exposure. On the basis of the final model, systemic clearance, steady-state volume of distribution, and terminal phase elimination half-life were estimated to be ~ 0.31 L/day, 11.1 L, and 26.3 days, respectively, for a typical 90 kg patient with PsA. Absolute SC bioavailability was estimated to be 83.5%. Exposure-response quartile analyses suggested that exposures associated with the clinical regimen maximized efficacy across the endpoints evaluated. No exposure dependency was observed for key safety endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Risankizumab exhibited linear and time-independent pharmacokinetics in patients with PsA and was comparable to patients with plaque psoriasis. Efficacy and safety exposure-response analyses support that the clinical regimen achieved robust efficacy with a favorable safety profile for patients with active PsA.

CLINICAL TRIALS

NCT02596217, NCT02719171, NCT02986373, NCT03671148, and NCT03675308.

CLINICAL TRIALS

NCT02596217, NCT02719171, NCT02986373, NCT03671148, and NCT03675308.

Efficacy and safety of treatment of moderate and severe psoriasis with the interleukin 23 inhibitor risankizumab

A review of the literature on the use of the genetically engineered biological drug Skyrizi (INN: risankizumab) for the treatment of psoriasis in patients is presented. The problem of high dissatisfaction of patients with the available means (methods) of therapy for this dermatosis is discussed. Inhibition of regulatory IL-23 seems to be a very promising direction of therapy, which makes it possible to block the immunopathogenesis of the disease. The IL-23 inhibitor risankizumab is a highly effective GEBA for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in patients. The use of this drug is accompanied by a very rapid and stable therapeutic response in the form of clear or almost clear skin. Long-term use of risankizumab demonstrates the maintenance of a stable therapeutic response without a tendency to decrease. Risankizumab has a favorable safety profile with a low risk of infections and malignancies. At the same time, such adverse events as the development of tuberculosis or inflammatory bowel disease are not typical for therapy with these GIBDs.

Impact of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Monoclonal Antibodies in the Management of Psoriasis

The treatment of psoriasis has been revolutionized by the emergence of biological therapies. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) generally have complex pharmacokinetic (PK) properties with nonlinear distribution and elimination. In recent years, several population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models capable of describing different types of mAb have been published. This study aims to summarize the findings of a literature search about population PK/PD modeling and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of mAb in psoriasis. A total of 22 articles corresponding to population PK/PD models of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors (adalimumab and golimumab), interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab), IL-23/IL-12 inhibitor (ustekinumab), and IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab) were collected. A summary of the clinical trials conducted so far in psoriasis was included, together with the current structural population PK and PD models. The most significant and clinical covariates were body weight (BW) and the presence of immunogenicity on clearance (CL). The lack of consensus on PK/PD relationships has prevented establishing an adequate dosage and, therefore, accentuates the need for TDM in psoriasis.

Long-term safety of risankizumab from 17 clinical trials in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

Background

Risankizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis in randomized clinical trials.

Objectives

To evaluate safety data from risankizumab psoriasis phase I–III clinical trials.

Methods

Short‐term safety (through week 16) was analysed using integrated data from five phase II and III clinical trials. Long‐term safety was evaluated using integrated data from 17 phase I–III completed and ongoing trials.

Results

Short‐term safety analyses included 1306 patients receiving risankizumab 150 mg and 300 patients receiving placebo [402·2 and 92·0 patient‐years (PY) of exposure, respectively]. Long‐term analyses included 3072 risankizumab‐treated patients (exposure: 7927 PY). The median (excluding four outliers) treatment duration was 2·9 years (range 2 days to 5·9 years). Exposure‐adjusted adverse event rates did not increase with long‐term treatment (318 vs. 171 events per 100 PY for short‐ and long‐term analyses). With long‐term risankizumab treatment, rates of serious adverse events were 7·8 per 100 PY, serious infections 1·2 per 100 PY, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) 0·7 per 100 PY, malignant tumours excluding NMSC 0·5 per 100 PY, and adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events 0·3 per 100 PY, with no important identified risks. Limitations include that the study inclusion and exclusion criteria varied and that three studies enrolled ≤ 50 patients.

Conclusions

Risankizumab demonstrated a favourable safety profile over short‐ and long‐term treatment in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis.

Whatis already known about this topic?

In clinical trials of patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis, risankizumab, a selective interleukin‐23 inhibitor, was well tolerated and efficacious.

Whatdoes this study add?

In this comprehensive evaluation of risankizumab safety in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis, adverse event rates were comparable between risankizumab (n = 1306, 402 patient‐years) and placebo (n = 300, 92 patient‐years) in the short‐term (16‐week) analysis set, and were consistent with those in the long‐term analysis (n = 3072, 7927 patient‐years of risankizumab exposure).

These findings are consistent with the known safety profile of risankizumab and support its long‐term use in moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis.

Linked Comment: S. Mirali et al. Br J Dermatol 2022; 186:394–395.

Plain language summary available online

Vaccinations in Patients Receiving Systemic Drugs for Skin Disorders: What Can We Learn for SARS-Cov-2 Vaccination Strategies?

Large-scale vaccination strategies are currently being deployed against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-Cov-2). Whether systemic medication for skin diseases affects the efficacy of vaccination and whether temporary interruption or extension of the dosing interval is necessary is under debate. Most immunomodulating/immunosuppressive drugs only affect vaccine-induced immune responses to a limited or moderate extent, preserving sufficient immunity in most patients. Mycophenolate mofetil, Janus kinase inhibitors, and rituximab require a more cautious approach, and judicious timing of vaccination might be appropriate in patients receiving these treatments. It should be noted that, for most drugs except methotrexate, data on the length of the interruption period to restore vaccine-induced immune responses to normal levels are either very limited or absent. In these cases, only the drug half-life can be used as a practical guideline. In most patients, systemic medication can be continued through the vaccination process, although case-by-case decisions can be considered.

Immunogenicity of biologics used in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis

The number of biologic drugs available for the treatment of psoriasis continue to expand. However, being biological proteins and thus potentially immunogenic, there is evidence that anti-drug-antibodies develop against the various therapeutic proteins currently being utilised. Although chimeric antibodies that contain elements of the parental rodent monoclonal antibodies are immunogenic, anti-drug antibodies occur even if the biologic is a fully human protein and these can impact on clinical efficacy and safety. However, there is a wide variation in the reported level of anti-drug-antibodies for the same and different treatments that is highlighting issues with various assays used in anti-drug antibody detection. Here we review the available data on the occurrence of anti-drug antibodies in people with psoriasis treated with biologic agents.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab Treatment in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Results from the Phase 2 Open-Label Extension Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Risankizumab, an interleukin-23 antibody, demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in a phase 2 study of patients with moderate-to-severe refractory Crohn's disease. This open-label extension investigated the long-term safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and efficacy of risankizumab in responders to risankizumab in the parent phase 2 study.

METHODS

Enrolled patients had achieved clinical response [decrease in Crohn's Disease Activity Index from baseline ≥100] without clinical remission [Crohn's Disease Activity Index <150] at Week 26, or clinical response and/or remission at Week 52 in the parent phase 2 study and received open-label subcutaneous risankizumab 180 mg every 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were enrolled, including four who had lost response in the parent study and were first reinduced with risankizumab 600 mg every 4 weeks [three infusions]. Patients received risankizumab for a median of 33 months [total: 167.0 patient-years]. The rate of serious adverse events was 24.6 events/100 patient-years; the majority were gastrointestinal in nature. Rates of serious infections, opportunistic infections and fungal infections were 4.2, 1.8, and 6.6 events/100 patient-years, respectively. No deaths, malignancies, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, latent/active tuberculosis or herpes zoster were reported. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies developed in eight patients [12.3%]; none were neutralizing. Efficacy outcomes were maintained during the study, including the proportions of patients [observed analysis] with clinical remission [>71%] and endoscopic remission [>42%].

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term maintenance treatment with subcutaneous risankizumab 180 mg every 8 weeks was well tolerated by patients with Crohn's disease, with no new safety signals. Clinical trial registration number: NCT02513459.

Immunogenicity of Biologic and Biosimilar Therapies for Psoriasis and Impact of Novel Immunoassays for Immunogenicity Detection

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) may develop against originator biologic and biosimilar therapies used for the treatment of psoriasis and may be the cause of initial therapeutic non-response or diminished therapeutic response over time. Comparing immunogenicity between therapeutic agents is challenging owing to the variation in assays used for detection, among other reasons. Using the results of a PubMed search for psoriasis clinical trials disclosing the rates of ADAs for originator biologic and biosimilar therapies approved for the treatment of psoriasis within the last 5 years, this review discusses the rates and potential clinical impact of ADA formation in patients with psoriasis managed with originator biologic and biosimilar therapies, along with novel methods of ADA testing. Anti-drug antibodies are detectable in all biologic and biosimilar therapies approved for the treatment of psoriasis in the last 5 years, and the effect of ADAs on clinical response varies by agent. Novel immunoassays used for the detection of ADAs may have increased sensitivity compared with traditional assays, although the increased rate of detection may not correlate with decreased clinical response and the decision to test for the presence of ADAs may vary from patient to patient. Though ADA formation seems ubiquitous with the use of biologic agents for the treatment of psoriasis, the increased rates of ADAs detected by novel immunoassays may not necessarily correlate with decreased treatment efficacy.

Pharmacokinetic Comparability of Risankizumab Formulations in Prefilled Syringe and Auto-injector for Subcutaneous Injection

PURPOSE

Risankizumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits the p19 subunit of interleukin 23 from interacting with its receptor for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The aim of this Phase I biopharmaceutics bridging study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic comparability, immunogenicity, and tolerability of the risankizumab 90 mg/mL prefilled syringe (PFS) and the risankizumab 150 mg/mL PFS and auto-injector (AI) in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Healthy subjects received one 150-mg dose of risankizumab in 1 of 3 ways (226 subjects randomized 3:3:1 to 3 treatment arms): 150 mg/mL by PFS × 1 SC injection, 90 mg/mL by PFS × 2 SC injections, or 150 mg/mL by AI × 1 SC injection, and were followed up for 140 days after dosing for the collection of pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, and tolerability data.

FINDINGS

Risankizumab concentration-time profiles overlapped with comparable pharmacokinetic parameters across all treatment arms, indicating similar pharmacokinetic characteristics. The CIs with both formulations and forms of administration were within the bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25 across all measures of exposure. The prevalence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies and the percentages of subjects who reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event were comparable across all treatment arms.

IMPLICATIONS

Bioequivalence was established between risankizumab 150 mg/mL PFS and 90 mg/mL PFS, and between 150 mg/mL PFS and AI, along with comparable immunogenicity profiles across all 3 treatment arms. Risankizumab 150 mg SC delivered by PFS or AI was well tolerated, with comparable safety profiles across all treatment arms, and no new safety risks were identified.

Immunogenicity to biological drugs in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Monoclonal antibodies or fusion proteins, defined as biological drugs, have modified the natural history of numerous immune-mediated disorders, allowing the development of therapies aimed at blocking the pathophysiological pathways of the disease, providing greater efficacy and safety than conventional treatment strategies. Virtually all therapeutic proteins elicit an immune response, producing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. Immunogenicity against biological drugs can alter their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, thereby reducing the efficacy of these drugs. In more severe cases, ADAs can neutralize the therapeutic effects of the drug or cause serious adverse effects, mainly hypersensitivity reactions. The prevalence of ADAs varies widely depending on the type of test used, occurrence of false-negative results, and non-specific binding to the drug, making it difficult to accurately assess their clinical impact. Concomitant use of immunosuppressors efficiently reduces the immunogenicity in a dose-dependent manner, either by decreasing the frequency of detectable ADAs or by delaying their appearance, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of biological therapies. Among the new therapeutic strategies for the management of psoriasis, biological agents have gained increasing importance in recent years as they interrupt key inflammation pathways involved in the physiopathology of the disease. Reports regarding ADA in new biologics are still scarce, but the most recent evidence tends to show little impact on the clinical response to the drug, even with prolonged treatment. It is therefore essential to standardize laboratory tests to determine the presence and titles of ADAs to establish their administration and management guidelines that allow the determination of the real clinical impact of these drugs.

Dermatologists on the medical need for therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in psoriasis: results of a structured survey

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may lead to more rational use of biologics. Still, TDM is largely underexplored in psoriasis. Little is known about the dosing behavior of biologics by dermatologists, and their attitude toward TDM.

OBJECTIVE

Exploration of the awareness and need for the concept of TDM in psoriasis amongst (inter)national dermatologists.

METHOD

A survey was distributed at the Belgian Dermatology Days 2019 and Skin Inflammation & Psoriasis International Network (SPIN) Congress 2019. Next, an online survey version was launched amongst the SPIN Scientific Committee members. We collected physician's characteristics, prescription behavior of biologics, data regarding clinical response to biologics and attitude toward TDM.

RESULTS

A total of 107 surveys were included for analysis. Most dermatologists were Belgium-based (54.2%), others from European (23.4%) or non-European countries (19.6%). Seventy percent performed either dose increase (64.8%), time interval shortening (74.6%), dose lowering (16.9%) or time interval extension (33.8%). The majority who performed dose adaptations acknowledged the need for TDM.

CONCLUSION

This study showed most dermatologists perform dose adaptations empirically. The need for TDM was indicated by the majority, implying the need for effective communication regarding availability, utility and implementation of TDM assays in daily dermatology practice.

Update on risankizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic landscape for psoriasis is ever-changing. Risankizumab is the newest approved biologic and one of three currently licensed that targets the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23). It is increasingly clear that different biologics vary in their efficacy, effectiveness, and safety profiles, highlighting that there is a need to understand for which patients and in which circumstances to use each drug.

AREAS COVERED

This article summarizes original clinical trial data, and reviews in more detail recent post-marketing studies and meta-analyses that differentiate risankizumab from other biologics. It also briefly explores the evidence for risankizumab in the treatment of other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

EXPERT OPINION

Risankizumab is a highly effective biologic for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Recent open-label extension data for risankizumab shows sustained treatment responses to week 136. Indirect comparisons suggest IL-17 inhibitors have a faster onset, though head-to-head comparison with secukinumab shows non-inferiority at week 16 and superiority of risankizumab at week 52. Risankizumab is very well tolerated and data from the IMMhance trial suggests that risankizumab can be used in patients with latent tuberculosis without risk of reactivation.

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMerge): results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, efficacy-assessor-blinded clinical trial

Background

Patients with plaque psoriasis treated with biologic therapies need more efficacious, safe and convenient treatments to improve quality of life. Risankizumab and secukinumab inhibit interleukin‐23 and interleukin‐17A, respectively, and are effective in adult patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis but have different dosing regimens.

Objectives

To compare directly the efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab over 52 weeks.

Methods

IMMerge was an international, phase III, multicentre, open‐label, efficacy–assessor‐blinded, active‐comparator study, in which adult patients with chronic, moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to treatment with risankizumab 150 mg or secukinumab 300 mg. Primary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of patients achieving ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) at week 16 (noninferiority comparison with margin of 12%) and week 52 (superiority comparison).

Results

In total 327 patients from nine countries were treated with risankizumab (n = 164) or secukinumab (n = 163). Risankizumab was noninferior to secukinumab in the proportion of patients achieving PASI 90 at week 16 [73·8% vs. 65·6%; difference of 8·2%, 96·25% confidence interval (CI)−2·2 to 18·6; within the 12% noninferiority margin] and superior to secukinumab at week 52 (86·6% vs. 57·1%; difference of 29·8%, 95% CI 20·8–38·8; P < 0·001), thus meeting both primary endpoints. All secondary endpoints (PASI 100, static Physician's Global Assessment 0 or 1, and PASI 75) at week 52 demonstrated superiority for risankizumab vs. secukinumab (P < 0·001). No new safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions

At week 52, risankizumab demonstrated superior efficacy and similar safety with less frequent dosing compared with secukinumab.

What is already known about this topic?

The need remains for treatments with sustained efficacy and a more convenient dosing schedule in moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis.

Risankizumab and secukinumab are indicated for the treatment of adults with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis and target interleukin‐23 and interleukin‐17, respectively.

To date, risankizumab and secukinumab have not been directly compared.

What does this study add?

IMMerge directly compared the safety and efficacy of risankizumab and secukinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis using ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at weeks 16 (noninferiority) and 52 (superiority) as primary endpoints.

In terms of efficacy risankizumab was noninferior to secukinumab at week 16 and superior to secukinumab at week 52 of treatment based on primary endpoint analyses. The two medications had a similar safety profile.

Linked Comment:Schmitt-Egenolf. Br J Dermatol 2021; 184: 3–4.

Plain language summary available online

Risankizumab-Aggravated Crusted Scabies in a Patient with Down Syndrome

Risankizumab, an interleukin (IL)-23 antagonist, is a highly effective treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis. Crusted scabies (CS) is a rare and severe form of scabies, occurring mainly in immunosuppressed patients and/or neurologically or mentally ill patients. A young girl with Down syndrome was diagnosed with a hyperkeratotic form of psoriasis. As treatment with topical dermocorticosteroids, UVB-phototherapy and acitretin for 6 weeks did not improve the lesions, two injections of risankizumab were administered. Following these injections, the lesions became rapidly even more severely crusted, and new lesions appeared on the extremities and the face of the patient. There was histological evidence of a high charge of scabies, leading to a diagnosis of CS. The patient was hospitalized and successfully treated by local permethrine and systemic ivermectine. This case suggests that even though anti-IL23 antagonists display an excellent overall safety profile, a particular caution for infections should still be respected in patients with underlying risk factors.