Targeting Low Disease Activity in Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current and Future Roles of Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

Management of Late-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis with Treat-to-Target Strategy

The incidence of patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA) is increasing. The clinical diagnosis of LORA is essentially the same as that of young-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA), but special attention should be paid to the differences in clinical features between LORA and YORA. Undertreatment of LORA can lead to reduced physical function and increased societal burden. The treat-to-target strategy has been successfully applied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but evidence supporting this strategy is still insufficient for LORA. A wide range of factors should be considered and evaluated in addition to age and RA-related factors, including comorbidity/organ damage, psycho-neurological factors, socio-economic factors and frailty. Considering the proportion of patients with LORA achieving clinical remission or low disease activity in observational studies, the treat-to-target strategy could be stratified by age. Patients with LORA aged < 75 years are treated according to the treat-to-target algorithm used for all patients with RA, with clinical remission as the main target and low disease activity as the alternative target. In patients with LORA aged ≥ 75 years, the initial main target is set at low disease activity, which can be escalated to clinical remission with appropriate adaptation of treatment if a favourable balance of effectiveness and safety is struck at the time of achieving low disease activity by 6 months of treatment. Evidence of the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of methotrexate, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, Janus kinase inhibitors and glucocorticoids in patients with LORA is accumulating, but further research is warranted.

Higher risk of poor functional outcome and unfavourable clinical events for late-onset rheumatoid arthritis: results from the IORRA cohort

OBJECTIVES

To compare treatment outcomes in patients with late-onset RA (LORA) and younger-onset RA (YORA).

METHODS

We analyzed patients diagnosed with early RA (disease duration < 2 years) between 2000 and 2016 in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort. Patients were categorized into LORA (onset at ≥65 years) and YORA (onset at <65 years). The primary outcomes were changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Japanese version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) at Year 5. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of prespecified adverse events.

RESULTS

Methotrexate, biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, and glucocorticoids were used in 70.6, 8.4 and 38.0% of the LORA group (n = 813, median age: 71 years), and 81.6, 19.4 and 32.0% of the YORA group (n = 2457, median age: 51 years). Both groups exhibited significant initial improvements in CDAI and J-HAQ scores. At Year 5, mean CDAI scores were 4.39 and 4.03 for the LORA and YORA groups, respectively. J-HAQ score for YORA remained stable below 0.5 after Year 2, whereas that for LORA worsened progressively. At Year 5, mean J-HAQ scores were 0.56 for LORA and 0.33 for YORA. Patients with LORA had a higher incidence of adverse events, with adjusted hazard ratios of 4.70 for death and 2.58 for malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LORA and YORA exhibited similar improvements in disease activity over 5 years; however, those with LORA demonstrated a more pronounced decline in physical function.

Consensus statement on the management of late-onset rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA), which has been increasing in recent years, lacks evidence for initial treatment. Japanese rheumatology experts recognized this gap and addressed it by developing consensus statements on the first clinical application of LORA.

METHODS

These statements were created following an introductory discussion about treatment fundamentals, which included a review of existing literature and cohort data. The steering committee created a draft, which was refined using a modified Delphi method that involved panel members reaching a consensus. The panel made decisions based on input from geriatric experts, clinical epidemiologists, guideline developers, patient groups, and the LORA Research Subcommittee of the Japan College of Rheumatology.

RESULTS

The consensus identified four established facts, three basic approaches, and six expert opinions for managing LORA. Methotrexate was recommended as the primary treatment, with molecular-targeted agents being considered if treatment goals cannot be achieved. An emphasis was placed on assessing the lives of older patients due to challenges in risk management and methotrexate accessibility caused by comorbidities or cognitive decline.

CONCLUSIONS

The experts substantiated and refined 13 statements for the initial treatment of LORA. To validate these claims, the next is to conduct a registry study focusing on new LORA cases.

Considerations for the use of biological therapies in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease that primarily affects middle-aged individuals but is increasingly prevalent among the elderly due to longer life expectancies. Treating elderly onset RA (EORA) is challenging for clinicians because of unique disease characteristics, comorbidities, polypharmacy, age-related physiological changes, and limited studies on the safety and efficacy of biological therapies in this population. This review aims to evaluate the use of various biological therapies in elderly RA patients.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review examines various aspects of RA in the elderly using published literature, randomized control trials, meta-analyses, and recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR).

EXPERT OPINION

In EORA patients, the initiation of biological therapy is often delayed. Methotrexate remains the first-line treatment for both EORA and young onset RA (YORA). The combination of methotrexate and biological treatment shows comparable safety and efficacy in both EORA and YORA, except for rituximab, which is less effective in patients over 75. For elderly RA patients, biological (b-) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are preferred as the first advanced therapy over targeted synthetic (ts-) DMARDs due to their superior safety profile.

Low-Dose Glucocorticoids in Older Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: What Does the Evidence Say?

The short-term use of glucocorticoids (GCs) in combination with methotrexate was recommended for the initial treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by the European League Against Rheumatism. A randomized controlled trial (GLORIA) showed that treatment of older patients with low-dose GCs in combination with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs was more efficacious than disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs plus placebo in terms of disease activity control and prevention of joint destruction. Glucocorticoid-related adverse events were likely to increase relative to placebo, with no increase in serious adverse events and fractures over 2 years. Observational studies showed an increased risk of serious infections, cardiovascular events, and fractures associated with long-term continuation of GCs in older patients, but the adverse events may be associated not only with GC toxicity but also with poor disease control of rheumatoid arthritis. In the GLORIA study, low-dose GCs during 2 years could be tapered off safely, but many patients had a flare of disease activity after discontinuation of GCs. In the two representative large Japanese registries (IORRA and NinJa), the proportion of patients using GCs and non-tumor necrosis factor inhibitors increased with increasing age at disease onset, with a decreasing trend in methotrexate use. The proportion of patients in remission with GC treatment also increased with increasing age at onset. These suggested that it is not easy to discontinue GCs in older patients. If GCs cannot be terminated in the short term, it may be acceptable to use GCs to control disease activity for up to 2 years.

Risk of hospitalized infections in older elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab or other biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Evaluation of data from a Japanese claims database

OBJECTIVE

We compared the incidence rates of hospitalized infections (HIs) between tocilizumab (TCZ) and other biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in adults aged ≥75 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We used a Japanese claims database from Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) to perform a retrospective longitudinal population-based study in patients with RA who were prescribed b/tsDMARDs between 2014 and 2019. We calculated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for HIs in three age groups (<65, ≥65 and <75, and ≥75 years).

RESULTS

Of 5506 patients, 2265 (41.1%) were <65 years, 1709 (31.0%) were 65-74 years, and 1532 (27.8%) were ≥75 years. Crude incidence rates (/100 person-years) of HIs were 3.99, 7.27, and 10.77, respectively. In the oldest group, aRRs (95% confidence interval) for HIs (b/tsDMARDs versus TCZ) were as follows: etanercept, 2.40 (1.24-4.61); adalimumab, 1.90 (0.75-4.83); golimumab, 1.21 (0.66-2.23); and abatacept, 0.89 (0.49-1.62). In the other age groups, the noticeable difference was a lower aRR of etanercept versus TCZ in the youngest group (0.30, 0.11-0.85).

CONCLUSION

In patients with RA aged ≥75 years, b/tsDMARDs have a similar risk of HIs to tocilizumab except for etanercept.

Factors associated with impaired physical function in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients who had achieved low disease activity

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate factors associated with impaired physical function [defined as Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) >0.5] of old-old (aged 75-84 years) patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

Data from 15,185 rheumatoid arthritis patients in the National Database of Rheumatic Disease in Japan were extracted from 2017 to 2018. We enrolled 3708 patients aged 55-84 years in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤11 and Steinbrocker Stage I/II. Factors associated with HAQ-DI >0.5 were analysed by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

About half of the old-old patients received methotrexate, which was lower than middle-aged (55-64 years) and young-old patients (65-74 years). The proportion of glucocorticoids in the old-old patients was highest among the three groups, and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were similarly used. The prevalence of HAQ-DI >0.5 was significantly higher in old-old patients with low disease activity than in those with remission. The same was true in the middle-aged and young-old patients. Multivariable analysis showed age, higher SDAI, glucocorticoid use, and methotrexate nonuse were significantly associated with HAQ-DI >0.5 in the old-old patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving SDAI remission was an ideal goal for old-old patients in terms of physical function. Glucocorticoids and a low proportion of methotrexate use may influence the physical function of old-old patients.

Long-Term Survival Prediction Model for Elderly Community Members Using a Deep Learning Method

In an aging society, maintaining healthy aging, preventing death, and enabling a continuation of economic activities are crucial. This study sought to develop a model for predicting survival times among community-dwelling older individuals using a deep learning method, and to identify the level of influence of various risk factors on the survival period, so that older individuals can manage their own health. This study used the Korean National Health Insurance Service claims data. We observed community-dwelling older people, aged 66 years, for 11 years and developed a survival time prediction model. Of the 189,697 individuals enrolled at baseline, 180,235 (95.0%) survived from 2009 to 2019, while 9462 (5.0%) died. Using deep-learning-based models (C statistics = 0.7011), we identified various factors impacting survival: Charlson's comorbidity index; the frailty index; long-term care benefit grade; disability grade; income level; a combination of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; sex; smoking status; and alcohol consumption habits. In particular, Charlson's comorbidity index (SHAP value: 0.0445) and frailty index (SHAP value: 0.0443) were strong predictors of survival time. Prediction models may help researchers to identify potentially modifiable risk factors that may affect survival.

Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis: Characteristics and Treatment Options

Elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) is a distinct clinical entity defined as the onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in individuals aged over 60 years. EORA presents unique clinical features, including a more equitable distribution of sexes, a potential predilection for male involvement, a higher incidence of acute onset characterized by constitutional symptoms, a propensity for systemic manifestations, elevated sedimentation rates at disease onset, a reduced occurrence of rheumatoid factor positivity, increased titers of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, a preference for involvement of large joints, elevated disease activity, the presence of bone erosions, and heightened patient disability. RA is recognized to consist of three partially overlapping subsets. One subset mirrors the classical RA clinical presentation, while the remaining subsets exhibit either a polymyalgia rheumatica-like phenotype or present with remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis accompanied by pitting edema syndrome. In the initial stages of EORA management, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are not typically the first-line treatment choice, because seniors are much more prone to develop side effects due to NSAIDs, and the use of NSAIDs is in reality contraindicated to the majority of seniors due to comorbidities. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), frequently methotrexate, are introduced immediately after the diagnosis is made. In cases where elderly patients demonstrate resistance to conventional DMARD therapy, the introduction of biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs becomes a viable treatment option. EORA presents a unique clinical profile, necessitating tailored treatment strategies. Our study emphasizes the challenges of NSAID use in seniors, highlighting the imperative shift toward DMARDs such as methotrexate. Future research should explore personalized DMARD approaches based on disease activity, comorbidities, and safety considerations, aiming to optimize treatment outcomes and minimize glucocorticoid reliance, thereby enhancing the quality of care for EORA patients.

Unusual presentation of rheumatoid arthritis in a 106-year-old woman: A rare case report

By reporting this case, we hope to encourage medical professionals to concentrate on diagnosing old patients with unusual presentation of rheumatoid arthritis.

Differentiating between Seronegative Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica: A Qualitative Synthesis of Narrative Reviews

Elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) is prevalent among older patients, and its incidence is increasing due to aging societies. However, differentiating between EORA and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is challenging for clinicians and hinders the initiation of effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis among older generations, thereby allowing its progression. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative synthesis of narrative reviews via meta-ethnography regarding seronegative EORA diagnosis to clarify the methods to differentiate seronegative EORA from PMR. Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science) were searched for relevant reviews published between January 2011 and October 2022. The extracted articles were synthesized using meta-ethnography, and 185 studies were selected following the protocol. Seven reviews were analyzed, and four themes and nine concepts were identified. The four themes included difficulty in differentiation, mandatory follow-up, and factors favoring rheumatoid arthritis and those favoring PMR. Factors favoring seronegative EORA and PMR should be considered for effective diagnosis and prompt initiation of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Mandatory and long follow-ups of suspected patients are essential for differentiating the two diseases. The attitude of rheumatologists toward tentatively diagnosing seronegative EORA and flexibly modifying their hypotheses based on new or altered symptoms can aid in effective management and avoiding misdiagnosis.

Late-onset rheumatoid arthritis has a similar time to remission as younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis: results from the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative

Background

The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in persons 60 years or older is estimated to be 2%. Late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA) is traditionally defined as the onset of RA after the age of 60 years. Compared to younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA) which occurs before the age of 60 years, LORA has unique characteristics and disease manifestations. To date, few reports have addressed LORA and the prognosis of LORA patients remains unclear. We compared the clinical characteristics, time to remission and treatment regimen at remission between LORA and YORA patients.

Methods

This prospective cohort study used a registry database in Ontario, Canada from 2008 to 2020. Patients were included if they had active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease (≥1 swollen joint) and were enrolled within 1 year of diagnosis. LORA was defined as a diagnosis of RA in persons 60 years and older and YORA as a diagnosis of RA in persons under the age of 60. Remission was defined by Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) ≤2.6. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate time to remission.

Results

The study included 354 LORA patients and 518 YORA patients. The mean (standard deviation) baseline DAS28 score was 5.0 (1.3) and 4.8 (1.2) in LORA and YORA patients, respectively (p=0.0946). Compared to YORA patients, the hazard ratio for remission in LORA patients was 1.10 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.34 p=0.36) after adjusting for other prognostic factors. For patients who reached remission, LORA patients were less likely to be on a biologic or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (16% vs. 27%) and more likely to be on a single conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) (34% vs. 27%) than YORA patients (p=0.0039).

Conclusion

LORA and YORA patients had similar prognosis in terms of time to remission. At remission, LORA patients were more likely to be on a single csDMARD without a biologic or JAK inhibitor.

[Care of rheumatology patients during the lockdown in early 2020 : Telemedicine, delegation, patient satisfaction and vaccination behavior]

BACKGROUND

Telemedicine was implemented in outpatient care during the lockdown between March and May 2020. The aim of the study was to assess patients from a private practice and the university outpatient department with respect to patient satisfaction with telemedicine, COVID-19 worries and vaccination behavior and to compare the teleconsultation by a medical assistant for rheumatology (RFA) and a physician.

METHODS

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatric arthropathy or spondylarthritis without treatment modifications since the previous presentation were offered a telemedical replacement appointment within the framework of this study in the case of appointment cancellation by the treating center. Participants were randomized to a telemedicine appointment by a physician or an RFA (RFA university only). The patient history was carried out by telephone and standardized using a questionnaire. The disease activity was determined using the modified clinical disease activity score (CDAI) and the BASDAI. Subsequently, all patients received a pseudonymized evaluation questionnaire.

RESULTS

In total 112/116 (96%) patients participated. Of these 88/112 (79%) returned the questionnaire. The RFAs conducted 19/112 (17%) of the telephone calls. The treatment was modified in 19/112 (17%) patients. Concerns about contracting COVID-19 correlated with high disease activity (p = 0.031) including the presence of painful joints (p = 0.001) and high pain levels (VAS ≥7, p = 0.009). These patients would have also cancelled their appointment themselves (p = 0.015). Patient satisfaction with the consultation was good (mean 4.3/5.0 modified FAPI) independent of the institution, the duration of the consultation and the consultation partner. Patients with a high pain intensity were the least satisfied (p = 0.036). Only 42/100 (38.2%) of the patients had been vaccinated against pneumococci and 59/100 (53.6%) against influenza.

CONCLUSION

Telemedical care within the framework of a telephone consultation is well-suited for selected patients. With respect to patient satisfaction the delegation of a telemedical consultation to an RFA is possible. There is a need for improvement with respect to the vaccination behavior.

Should we reconsider the definition of elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis in an ageing society?

OBJECTIVES

The management of elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) is challenging due to progressive functional disability, increased comorbidities, and high drug-related risks. EORA is defined as disease onset after 60 years since 1985. We assessed whether this cut-off age was optimal in a progressively ageing society.

METHODS

This study used two cohorts of consecutive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients: the Nippon Medical School (NMS) cohort (n = 204) and the Keio cohort (n = 296). Clinical findings independently correlated with the age of RA onset were selected as 'EORA features' from previously reported EORA characteristics using univariable and multivariable regression analyses. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to determine the cut-off age that best selected patients with all EORA features.

RESULTS

Acute onset, negative anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, and high erythrocyte sedimentation rate were selected as 'EORA features' in both cohorts. Patients with all EORA features were more numerous with age and almost exclusively older than 65 years. The optimal EORA cut-off age was 73 years with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 in the NMS cohort and 68 with an AUC of 0.93 in the Keio cohort. In the NMS cohort, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and comorbidities in patients with disease onset between 60 years and the projected cut-off age were similar to those in younger-onset RA, but differed from those in patients with disease onset older than the projected cut-off age.

CONCLUSION

The optimal EORA cut-off age was greater than the conventional definition, but this needs to be validated in different patient populations.

Drug efficacy and safety of biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are frequently associated with higher disease activity and impaired physical function, although they show intolerance for conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), such as methotrexate, because of their comorbidities. However, the present treatment recommendation based on randomized controlled trials is not distinguished by age or comorbidities. Therefore, this review aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in elderly patients. Present bDMARDs, including tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4-immunoglobulin (abatacept), interleukin (IL)-6 receptor antibody (tocilizumab and salirumab), and anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab), may be similarly or slightly less effective or safe in elderly patients compared with younger patients. Oral glucocorticoid use, prolonged disease duration, and very old patients appear to be associated with an increased risk of adverse events, such as serious infection. Some recent cohort studies demonstrated that non-TNFi showed better retention than TNFi in elderly patients. Both TNFi and non-TNFi agents may not strongly influence the risk of adverse events such as cardiovascular events and malignancy in elderly patients. Regarding JAKi, the efficacy appears to be similar, although the safety (particularly for serious infections, including herpes zoster) may be attenuated by aging.

Antirheumatic drugs in older adults and polypharmacy issues

Older individuals experience various noninflammatory and autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Given the increased incidence of rheumatic conditions in older adults, it is of great importance for healthcare providers to be aware of the potential benefits and risks of antirheumatic drugs. The present article aims to provide a comprehensive review regarding antirheumatic drug use in older patients, particularly by focusing on safety issues and polypharmacy. Antirheumatic medications include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), which comprise conventional synthetic DMARDs, targeted synthetic DMARDs and biological DMARDs. Due to the alteration in drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in old people, antirheumatic drug efficiency and safety may be different than in the younger population. Polypharmacy and multimorbidity are other potential challenges to be faced during the treatment of older patients with rheumatic diseases. The current review also discusses the strategies to minimize adverse reactions due to antirheumatic drugs.

Habitual fish intake negatively correlates with prevalence of frailty among patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Frailty is a geriatric syndrome characterized by anabolic-catabolic imbalance and multisystem dysregulation resulting in increased adverse health outcomes, and is closely related with dietary habits in the general population. Although chronic inflammatory diseases are thought to accelerate development of frailty, correlations between rheumatoid arthritis (RA), frailty and dietary habits have not been examined. We performed a cross-sectional study using our cohort database (KURAMA cohort), and classified 306 participants into three groups (robust, prefrail and frail) according to the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture (SOF) criteria. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that the presence of frailty/prefrailty was significantly correlated with the disease activity score (DAS28-ESR) (OR 1.70 (1.30–2.22), p < 0.0001). Additional analyses of frailty and food intake showed that 5 foods (fish, meat, milk, vegetables and fruits) of 20 groups on the questionnaire were inversely associated with the prevalence of frail/prefrail categories. In multivariate analysis with the five nutrients, fish intake (> two times a week) was an independent covariate negatively correlated with frailty/prefrailty (OR 0.35 (0.19–0.63), p = 0.00060). In conclusion, habitual fish intake may play a key role in nutritional intervention to prevent progression of frailty and RA.

Features and Outcomes of Elderly Rheumatoid Arthritis: Does the Age of Onset Matter? A Comparative Study From a Single Center in China

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this work is to investigate the clinical and radiological characteristics of elderly rheumatoid arthritis and compare the outcomes between the two subgroups, elderly- and young-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA and YORA, respectively).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study on the elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients in our medical center. EORA was defined as the patient whose onset age was above 60.

RESULTS

A total of 142 elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients were admitted, with 79 patients in EORA and 63 in YORA group. Inflammatory parameters including C-reactive protein, D-dimer, serum ferritin, and platelet count levels were all higher in the EORA group than those in YORA. EORA patients showed a higher score of health assessment questionnaire's disability index (p = 0.01) and patient global health assessment (p = 0.049), but a lower status of modified total sharp score (p = 0.001). Bivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that elderly onset of the disease (OR 2.30, 95% CI [1.45-3.77]), age (OR 2.04, 95% CI [1.22-3.41]), high disease activity (OR 1.90, 95% CI [1.17-3.32]), and red blood cell distribution width (OR 1.81, 95% CI [1.03-3.19]) were independent prognostic factors of disability. Age (OR 0.25, 95% CI [0.07-0.91]), disease duration (OR 2.73, 95% CI [0.97-7.70]), and co-morbid diabetes mellitus (OR 118.10, 95% CI [3. 50-3985.57]) independently contributed to radiographic joint damage in the elderly population. EORA patients showed increased death incidents and worse prognosis than YORA. Cox regression analysis reveals that comorbid hypertension (HR 12.02, 95% CI [1.08-133.54]), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (HR 85.04, 95% CI [4.11-1759.19]), and compressive fracture (HR 85.04, 95% CI [4.11-1759.19]) are independent predictors of mortality, and that ILD (HR 50.21, 95% CI [5.56-335.33]) and pulmonary hypertension (HR 25.37, 95% CI [3.03-265.81]) are independent predictors of no disease remission in the EORA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The distinct features of EORA patients make EORA a unique entity different from "classic rheumatoid arthritis". EORA patients develop an upgraded systemic inflammatory status, more declined life quality, and worse prognosis than the elderly YORA. Better control of the comorbidities like ILD and diabetes mellitus may benefit the management of elderly rheumatoid arthritis. Further investigation regarding the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies of EORA is urgently warranted.

The first biological choice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Moroccan register of biotherapies

Introduction

the aim of our study is to determine, from data of the Moroccan register of biotherapies, the factors influencing the choice of the first prescribed biological treatment.

Methods

cross-sectional multicenter study including rheumatoid arthritis patients who were initiated the first biological treatment either: Rituximab, an anti-TNF, or Tocilizumab. The determinants related to the patient and disease have been gathered. A univariate and then multivariate analysis to determine the factors associated with the choice of the first bDMARDs was realized.

Results

a total of 225 rheumatoid arthritis patients were included in the Moroccan registry. The mean age was 52 ± 11 years, with female predominance 88% (n = 197). The first prescribed biological treatment was Rituximab 74% (n = 166), the second one was Tocilizumab, 13.6% (n = 31) then comes the anti-TNF in 3^rd position with 12.4% (n = 28). The factors associated with the choice of Rituximab as the first line bDMARDs prescribed in univariate analysis were: the insurance type, the positivity of the rheumatoid factor. In multivariate analysis, only the insurance type that remains associated with the choice of Rituximab as the first biological drugs. The Tocilizumab was associated with shorter disease duration and was more prescribed as mono-therapy compared to non Tocilizumab group. TNFi was associated with the insurance type.

Conclusion

our study suggests that Rituximab and TNFi are associated with the type of insurance and Tocilizumab is the most prescribed biologic mono-therapy in RA patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Similarity of Response to Biologics Between Elderly-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (EORA) and Non-EORA Elderly Patients: From the FIRST Registry

OBJECTIVE

Increasing numbers of patients are developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at an older age, and optimal treatment of patients with elderly-onset RA (EORA) is attracting greater attention. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in EORA and non-EORA elderly patients.

METHODS

A cohort of patients with RA treated with b/tsDMARDs were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients aged ≥ 60 years were included. Among them, patients who developed RA aged ≥ 60 years were categorized as EORA, whereas those aged < 60 years were categorized as non-EORA elderly. Disease activity was compared between the EORA and non-EORA elderly groups.

RESULTS

In total, 1040 patients were categorized as EORA and 710 as non-EORA elderly. There were no significant differences in characteristics at baseline between the 2 groups. The proportion of patients with low and high disease activity was comparable at Weeks 2, 22, and 54 between the EORA and the non-EORA elderly group. There were no significant differences in the reasons for the discontinuation of b/tsDMARDs between the 2 groups. Elderly RA onset did not affect changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, nor did it affect the reasons for b/tsDMARD discontinuation between the 2 groups. The trajectory analysis on CDAI responses to b/tsDMARDs for 54 weeks identified 3 response patterns. The proportion of patients categorized into each group and CDAI response trajectories to b/tsDMARDs were very similar between EORA and non-EORA elderly patients.

CONCLUSION

CDAI response patterns to b/tsDMARDs and HR of adverse events were similar between EORA and non-EORA elderly patients.

Selectivity of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Other Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Is Expectation the Root of All Headache?

Janus kinase (JAK) is a signal transducer and activator of a protein transcription system that transduces signals from cell surface cytokine and growth factor receptors to the nucleus. Recently developed JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) inhibit JAKs non-selectively or selectively and down-regulate the effects of corresponding ligands (i.e. cytokines and growth factors). JAKinibs are efficacious against rheumatoid arthritis and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and are being increasingly prescribed clinically. Regarding safety, JAKinib use is associated with common or unique changes in laboratory parameters; however, incidence rates of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these changes are low. Opportunistic and other infections, including tuberculosis, are the most critical ADRs of treatment with JAKinibs, and screening and monitoring of patients should be carefully performed. Incidence rates of herpes zoster (HZ) in patients receiving JAKinibs are high in Japan and Korea, and modestly high in other countries. Filgotinib may not be associated with an elevated risk for HZ, but long-term safety data are lacking. Data from clinical development programmes and post-marketing surveillance have indicated no increased risk for malignancy or serious cardiac events; however, long-term observational studies are necessary. Despite the non-elevated risk of gastrointestinal perforations, patients with older age and/or a history of diverticulitis or receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be carefully evaluated to determine the risk-benefit balance. The incidence rates of venous thromboembolism with all approved doses are similar to that expected in the population, although there are discrepancies in the placebo-controlled portion of the baricitinib clinical development programmes. Regulatory agencies in the USA and Europe suggested a higher risk for thrombotic events in patients receiving JAKinibs. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that dose adjustment should be considered for JAKinib use in patients with moderate-to-severe renal or hepatic dysfunction, depending on the metabolism of each drug. Long-term observational studies enrolling patients with diverse clinical backgrounds are required to strike a risk-benefit balance in clinical settings.

[Biotherapies in elderly patients]

The ageing of the population leads health professionals to question the tolerance and the effectiveness of the different biotherapies used in autoimmune diseases. Due to the exponential increase of biotherapies and their indications, several studies have been carried out to evaluate their impact on elderly patients suffering from autoimmune disease. However, these studies are still too few to take into account all the different specificities of elderly patients and their comorbidities; prescribers are therefore hesitant with their introduction after 75 years or even 65. More than the age of patients, it is necessary to evaluate the comorbidities before introducing this kind of treatments. Every biotherapy has different indications and contraindications, which must be known to adapt each treatment to each patient. This focus aims to remind of the adaptations and contraindications of the different biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for geriatric population, and improve their uses since the treatments for these patients are sometimes not enough. Here we resume the methods allowing supervisors to identify errors of clinical reasoning in medical students and interns and we explain remediation techniques adapted to the types of error identified. Access to short illustrative videos of a MOOC (Massive Open On line Course) devoted to the supervision of clinical reasoning constitutes practical help for supervisors who are not expert in the complexity of medical pedagogy at the bedside.

Differential long-term retention of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by age group from the FIRST registry

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) by age group (< 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years) are uncertain. We examined retention rates reflecting the effectiveness and safety of bDMARDs in actual clinical practice for clarifying optimal therapeutic strategies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by age groups.

METHODS

Data of patients who were treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), abatacept (ABA), and tocilizumab (TCZ) between February 2011 and April 2017 were collected from a prospective observational registry of RA patients. A total of 1362 patients were enrolled, of which 695 were aged < 65 years, 402 were aged 65-74 years, and 265 were aged ≥ 75 years. Primary outcome was the drug retention rate in adjusted data using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on generalized propensity scores.

RESULTS

In patients aged < 65 years, 3-year retention rates of TNFi, ABA, and TCZ were 43%, 47%, and 69%, respectively (ABA versus TCZ, p = 0.017; TNFi versus TCZ, p = 0.002). In patients aged 65-74 years, 3-year retention rates of TNFi, ABA, and TCZ were 44%, 53%, and 60%, respectively (TCZ versus TNFi, p = 0.034). In patients aged ≥ 75 years, 3-year retention rates for TNFi, ABA, and TCZ were 38%, 63%, and 58%, respectively (ABA versus TNFi, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the effectiveness and safety of TCZ were maximal in patients aged < 75 years and that patients aged ≥ 75 years might be suitable candidates for TCZ and ABA therapy. The use of therapeutic strategies appropriate to each age group might improve the outcomes of bDMARD therapy for RA.

Outcomes with Biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) in Older Patients Treated for Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are recommended for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but older patients reportedly experience more adverse events (AEs) and show variable treatment response. The objective of this study was to evaluate AEs and effectiveness of bDMARDs in a cohort of older patients.

METHODS

AE and treatment effectiveness (based on DAS28 scores) data from a prospective provincial pharmacovigilance program for the years 2006-2009 in patients 55-64, 65-74, and 75+ years of age were compared. An intention to treat analysis with chi-square and unpaired t-testing for significance was performed.

RESULTS

There were a total of 333 patients (156 were aged 55-64, 125 were 65-74, 52 were 75+). Those 75+ had higher disease activity and worse functional status at baseline. Among those 75+, AEs with bDMARDs were more common and likely to lead to discontinuation of therapy, be graded as severe, and classified as infectious (p < .05). Remission rate among those 75+ was significantly higher than patients 65-74. Etanercept was the most commonly used drug in all age groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients 75+ treated with bDMARDs are at a significantly greater risk of AEs, including infectious ones. The higher remission found in the oldest age group warrants further study.

Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Is Effective for Treatment of Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by systemic articular and bone manifestations and its pathogenesis is driven by a complex network of proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor and interleukin (IL)-6. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been standardized by the introduction of a treat-to-target approach. Subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) is a humanized anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, and is widely used for refractory RA patients in the clinical settings. However, it remains unknown whether TCZ-SC shows effectiveness for elderly onset RA. The study was aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of TCZ-SC in elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) patients in daily practice. Fifty-five RA patients were divided into two age groups upon TCZ-SC administration: young (Y) group (< 65 years old, n = 30) and elderly-onset (EO) group (> 65 years old, n = 25). Disease activity score-28 (DAS28) upon TCZ-SC administration (4.84 in EO group vs. 4.41 in Y group) was significantly decreased to 1.94 vs. 1.93 at 3 months and 1.61 vs. 1.75 at 12 months after administration. The clinical remission (DAS28 < 2.6) rate was 75% in EO group vs. 83% in Y group at 3 months and 90% vs. 85% at 12 months. The retention rate at 12 months was 88% in EO group and 92% in Y group without significant difference. The cessation cases of adverse events were two in each group. In conclusion, TCZ-SC showed good clinical effectiveness and safety in EORA patients. TCZ-SC is a useful agent for patients with EORA.

Validity of adopting a Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index less than 0.5 as a target in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients

OBJECTIVES

The effect of age on the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and the validity of adopting HAQ-DI < 0.5 as the target for functional remission and comprehensive disease control (CDC) under a treat-to-target (T2T) treatment strategy were investigated.

METHOD

A total of 441 RA patients with > 3-year treatment under T2T were evaluated. The relationships between the HAQ-DI score at follow-up (HAQ) and 28-joint Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein, Sharp/van der Heijde Score, age at follow-up, and HAQ-DI at baseline were statistically evaluated with best subset regression analysis in groups separated according to age and the EULAR response. CDC status was evaluated with a chi-square test.

RESULTS

The HAQ score significantly correlated with all indices in the group ≥ 65 years old (G-O) and in the group with good or moderate EULAR responses (p < 0.01). No significant correlation was observed in the group < 65 years old (G-Y) or in the group with no EULAR response. The CDC ratio was not significantly different between the age groups, whereas the HAQ failure ratio was significantly greater in G-O than in G-Y (p < 0.01). No significant difference was found between the EULAR response groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The HAQ score is influenced by age in patients > 65 years. T2T is appropriate for attaining good disease activity control but does not always lead to functional remission in these patients. The HAQ score < 0.5 is not an appropriate target for functional remission according to the CDC criteria for elderly patients.Key Points• ADL in elderly RA patient aged ≥ 65 years declines corresponding to his/her aging.• Functional remission for elderly RA patients is not the same as that for young RA patients.• The HAQ score < 0.5 in elderly RA patient is not an appropriate target for CDC.

Risk of serious infection among patients receiving biologics for chronic inflammatory diseases: Usefulness of administrative data

•

In this cohort, adalimumab and etanercept are the most commonly prescribed biologics.

•

Risk of hospitalized infections increases under biologic agents.

•

Risk is much higher in the elderly and in the presence of comorbidities.

•

Upper and lower respiratory tract infections are the most common infections.

•

Administrative data are useful for confirming the observation of clinical trials.

Risk of hospitalized infections under biologics among patients suffering from chronic inflammatory autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PSA), or psoriasis was investigated using administrative data. The hospital discharge records database, the medical prescription database, and the database of exemptions from medical charges were linked at the individual patient level. A cohort of patients diagnosed with RA, SA, PSA, and severe psoriasis from 2006 to 2017 was identified and followed-up to either the end of 2017 or hospitalization with the main discharge diagnosis of infection, death, or they moved out of the region. Multiple Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of hospitalization associated with bDMARDs and adjusting for age, sex, Charlson’s Comorbidity Index, calendar year, prescription of steroids, and use of csDMARDs. Use of bDMARDs was treated as a time-dependent variable. A total of 5596 patients diagnosed with RA, AS, or PSA/severe psoriasis were included in the cohort. Overall, 289 (4.2%) were hospitalized due to infection. Time to first use of biological drugs was significantly associated with a 55% increased risk of hospitalization for infections. Thus, large cohorts from administrative databases are useful to support observations from registries and clinical trials. Patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory diseases are at risk of serious infections when starting biologics. This risk is higher in the elderly or those with comorbidities. Upper and lower respiratory tract infections are the most common infections. Our findings support prevention policies such as vaccination.

Late onset psoriatic arthritis in a longitudinal cohort: Disease presentation, activity over time and prognosis

AIMS

To evaluate disease activity of late onset psoriatic arthritis (LoPsA) patients at presentation, during follow-up, and after 5years of follow-up, compared to young onset PsA patients (YoPsA).

METHODS

The study included patients with PsA followed prospectively within 2years from diagnosis. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) LoPsA - defined as disease onset ≥ 50 years, (2) YoPsA - defined as disease onset < 50 years. Descriptive statistics are provided and multivariable logistic regression models were developed to compare these groups.

RESULTS

Five hundred and sixty-six patients were included at presentation. Regression analysis showed that the LoPsA group at presentation was characterized by: less males (OR 0.4, p = 0.001), less HLA-C*06 (OR 0.3, p = 0.005), longer psoriasis duration (OR 1.04, p = 0.0005), higher BMI (OR 1.1, p = 0.005) and higher modified Steinbrocker score (mSS) (OR 1.1, p = 0.005). Regression analysis adjusted for gender, BMI, psoriasis duration, HLA and treatments after 5years of follow-up revealed a trend toward higher adjusted mean active joint count (OR 7.98, p = 0.052) and higher mean mSS score (OR 13.39, p = 0.007) in the LoSpA group compared to the YoPsA group. During 5years of follow-up, the YoPsA patients were treated with more NSAIDs (96% vs. 88%, p = 0.04), while there were no significant differences in the DMARDs and biologic drugs.

CONCLUSION

The LoPsA patients at presentation are characterized by female predominance, higher BMI, more damage and less HLA-C*06. After 5years of follow-up the LoPsA patients have worse prognosis manifested by a trend toward higher disease activity burden and significantly more damage.

Efficacy and safety of biological agents in the older rheumatoid arthritis patients compared to Young: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Biologic anti-rheumatic drugs are used with less frequency among older patients compared to young patients. This population is less represented in studies performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this drugs. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of biological agents between the older RA patients compared to young.

METHODS

A comprehensive, systematic search was conducted in major indexing databases using key terms for RA and each biological agent. The review process was completed by 2 investigators. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies of at least 6-month duration conducted in adult RA patients were included. Outcomes of interest were clinical efficacy and safety. Effect-estimates were pooled using random-effects modeling if 4 or more studies used the same scale and time-frame for measuring outcomes.

RESULTS

24 studies (16 focusing on anti-TNF agents) representing 63,705 patients (24% were older) were included. Older RA patients had worse baseline RA disease activity, longer disease duration at the time of enrollment in the trial (14.4 ± 3.6 vs. 10.9 ± 3.6 years; p < 0.001) and higher steroid use (73.2 vs. 64.7%, p < 0.001) than younger. 5 out of 6 studies assessing anti-TNF agents showed worse efficacy outcomes in older patients. The pooled OR of infection and ADRs with anti-TNF agents in older compared to young RA patients was OR 1.59 (95% CI: 1.45-1.76) and 1.40 (95% CI: 1.23-1.61) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients had worse safety and efficacy with biological agents but also had worse baseline disease activity. There was significant heterogeneity in reporting outcomes and very limited studies in biological agents other than anti-TNF drugs.

RABBIT risk score and ICU admission due to infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are at increased risk of infection. Aim of the present study was to investigate whether RA patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) due to infection have higher Rheumatoid Arthritis Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) risk scores compared to control RA patients. Seventy-four RA patients (32.4% male) admitted to an ICU due to infection (from January 2002 to December 2013) and 74 frequency-matched control RA patients (16.2% male) were included in this cross-sectional study. There was strong evidence for a higher RABBIT risk score in ICU patients (median 2.0; IQR 1.3-3.2) as compared to controls (1.3; IQR 0.8-2.0; p < 0.0001). Traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (82.4 vs 64.9%; p = 0.015) and biological DMARDs (28.4 vs 14.9%; p = 0.012) were more frequently given to RA patients without ICU admission. Glucocorticoid users were more frequently found in the ICU group (51.4 vs 31.1%; p = 0.012). In a multivariable analysis tDMARD use was associated with lower (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.93; p = 0.034) and glucocorticoid use with borderline higher odds of ICU admission (OR 2.05; 95% CI 0.92-4.58; p = 0.078). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.10-7.54; p = 0.03), chronic kidney disease (OR 16.08; 95% CI 2.00-129.48; p = 0.009), and age category (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.46-4.87; p = 0.001) were strongly associated with ICU admission. There was a strong trend towards higher odds of ICU admission with increasing RABBIT risk score. Use of tDMARDs was associated with lower odds of ICU admission. In an adjusted analysis, bDMARDs were not associated with ICU admission. COPD, CKD, and age were strong risk factors for ICU admission.

Safety and Efficacy of Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Older Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Staying the Distance

The population of older individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is rapidly expanding, mainly due to increased life expectancy. While targeted biological therapies are well established for the treatment of this disease, their use may be lower in older patients (age > 65 years) and very old patients (age > 75 years) as a result of perceived higher risks for adverse events in this population, taking into account comorbidity, polypharmacy, and frailty. In this review, we discuss the available evidence for the use of biological therapies in this growing patient group with specific attention towards the eventual reasons for biological treatment failure or withdrawal. The majority of data is found in secondary analyses of clinical trials and in retrospective cohorts. The most information available is on tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers. Older patients seem to have a less robust response to anti-TNF agents than a younger population, but drug survival as a proxy for efficacy does not seem to be influenced by age. Despite an overall rate of adverse effects comparable to that in younger patients, older RA patients are at higher risk of serious infections. Other biologics appear to have an efficacy similar to anti-TNF agents, also in older RA patients. Again, the drug survival rates for tocilizumab, rituximab, and abatacept resemble those in young RA patients with good general tolerability and safety profiles. The cardiovascular risk and the risk of cancer, increased in RA patients and in the older RA patients, do not appear to be strongly influenced by biologicals.

Drug interaction between methotrexate and salazosulfapyridine in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background

Methotrexate (MTX) and salazosulfapyridine (SASP) are disease-modifying drugs that are commonly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and combination therapy with MTX and SASP is recommended for RA patients who show an inadequate response to monotherapy with either drug. This study was designed to examine the interaction between the two drugs from the viewpoint of serum MTX concentration in Japanese RA patients, who were receiving combination therapy with relatively low doses of MTX and SASP.

Methods

This is a 24-week open-label intervention study of stable RA patients (n = 10) with low disease activity. In these patients, who had received SASP/MTX combination therapy for at least 12 weeks, SASP was discontinued, and the patients received MTX monotherapy for the next 24 weeks. The primary outcome was change of serum MTX concentration at 12 weeks after discontinuation of SASP. Two disease activity markers, simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and disease activity score-C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), were assessed as secondary outcomes at 24 weeks after discontinuation of SASP. We also monitored levels of matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) and inflammatory cytokines. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire after the study.

Results

Serum MTX concentration in RA patients who discontinued SASP increased more than 2-fold within 4 weeks, and the higher level was maintained thereafter. No significant differences were detected in SDAI, DAS28-CRP, MMP-3 or inflammatory cytokines. Most participants reported no change in physical condition after withdrawal of SASP, and most preferred MTX monotherapy for future treatment.

Conclusions

Withdrawal of SASP from patients receiving SASP/MTX caused a rapid, marked increase of serum MTX concentration, without any apparent change in disease parameters or side effects. Our results suggest that SASP can be discontinued without adverse effects in stable RA patients receiving combination therapy, at least among Japanese patients receiving relatively low doses of the two drugs.

Trial registration

UMIN000024507. October 21, 2016 retrospectively registered.

Differences in Predictive Factors for Sustained Clinical Remission with Abatacept Between Younger and Elderly Patients with Biologic-naive Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from the ABROAD Study

OBJECTIVE

To differentiate predictive factors for sustained clinical remission between elderly and younger patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving abatacept (ABA) as an initial biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug.

METHODS

The study involved 277 biologic-naive patients with RA with high or moderate disease activity, who were treated with intravenous ABA and evaluated for 48 weeks in 43 Japanese hospitals and rheumatology clinics (the ABatacept Research Outcomes as a First-line Biological Agent in the Real WorlD study: UMIN000004651). Predictive factors associated with sustained clinical remission defined by the 28-joint Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) during the 24-48-week or 36-48-week periods were determined in elderly (≥ 65 yrs, n = 148) and younger patient groups (< 65 yrs, n = 129) using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Clinical remission was achieved at 24 and 48 weeks in 35.1% and 36.5% of patients in the elderly group and 34.9% and 43.4% in the younger group, respectively. In elderly patients, anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity and a lower DAS28-CRP score were significantly associated with sustained clinical remission; however, a lower Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score was not related to sustained clinical remission. In younger patients, lower DAS28-CRP and HAQ-DI scores were predictive factors for sustained clinical remission, whereas ACPA positivity was not a useful predictive factor for sustained clinical remission.

CONCLUSION

Although the effectiveness of ABA in biologic-naive patients with RA was equally recognized in elderly and younger patients, the baseline clinical characteristics associated with sustained clinical remission were substantially different.