A Systematic Review of Inequalities in the Mental Health Experiences of Black African, Black Caribbean and Black-mixed UK Populations: Implications for Action

EQUALSS GUIDE Multiple: A novel framework for equity-focused evidence synthesis

Background

Understanding the differential effects of health and care interventions across disadvantaged groups is essential in addressing inequalities and avoiding inadvertently worsening them. Previous research has highlighted limitations with the existing PROGRESS-Plus framework. We aimed to develop a framework to allow researchers to synthesise evidence with an equity perspective.

Methods

First, we re-analysed articles from the EQUALISE study, a review of interventions that increase or decrease inequalities in general practice, to explore the various domains of disadvantage examined in the included studies. We then compared these domains of disadvantage with the existing PROGRESS-Plus framework. Finally, we propose a new framework to support equity-focused evidence synthesis.

Findings

From the 325 studies included in EQUALISE, the most commonly assessed PROGRESS-Plus domains were sex/gender (53%), ethnicity/race (50%), and age (44%). The PROGRESS-Plus framework did not include explict mention of context-specific groups, those with multiple intersecting disadvantage, and people who experience disability. Building on PROGRESS-Plus, our new framework EQUALSS GUIDE Multiple includes: Ethnicity and race, Qualifications and education, Underserved area, Age, Language and religion, Sex, Sexual orientation, Gender identification, Underrepresented groups (inclusion groups), Income and wealth, Disability (physical, mental and learning), Employment and occupation, and Multiple disadvantage.

Interpretation

EQUALSS GUIDE Multiple builds on PROGRESS-Plus to encapsulate key domains of disadvantage while allowing for context-specific flexibility. Examining the effectiveness of policy and practice interventions by disadvantaged groups is paramount to prioritise actions that narrow the health gap and prevent actions which widen inequalities.

Knowledge and awareness of healthcare systems and the uptake of diabetic services among Chinese people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in the UK

OBJECTIVES

Diabetes poses a significant public health challenge. The Chinese community has unique cultural characteristics that can influence their understanding of the diabetes healthcare system and engagement with services. This study aims to explore the knowledge and awareness of the diabetes healthcare system and the uptake of healthcare services in the UK Chinese population.

DESIGN

This study adopted a qualitative design. Three focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted on Zoom with 22 Chinese participants with self-reported type 2 diabetes living in the UK. Participants ranged from 24 to 85 years (mean age = 66 years, SD = 17.1). A purposive sample was recruited through study adverts in Chinese community centres and snowball sampling. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis (TA).

RESULTS

This paper discusses 4 themes: Awareness and understanding of diabetes, healthcare access and utilisation, attitudes towards diabetes prevention programmes and Chinese medicine vs. Western medicine. Limited knowledge and awareness of diabetes was highlighted, with cultural factors impacting this. Factors which impacted healthcare access and utilisation were linguistic/ communication challenges, and trust and perception of the NHS. Participants were unaware of diabetes prevention programmes and highlighted that these were culturally inappropriate. Generational preferences were noted in the way participants wished to receive diabetes education. The western medical system was viewed as medication focused, therefore the older Chinese community trusted familiar natural methods of illness management.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the importance of ensuring diabetes education is culturally appropriate. Generational differences in education preference should be recognised by healthcare professionals to increase healthcare engagement. These findings demonstrate the important need to educate UK healthcare professionals with the unique sociocultural contexts for this ethnic group. This study uncovers gaps in awareness and service uptake, highlighting the need for co-development of interventions that promote health equity and improve diabetes management within this population.

The role of Black-led community organisations in supporting Black mental health: a Black emancipatory action research project

OBJECTIVE

To explore the role of Black-led community organisations in supporting Black mental health and wellbeing in the UK.

DESIGN

A qualitative, Black Emancipatory Action Research Framework was adopted. Framework application involved adequately compensating community organisations for their consultancy role; having 'research conversations' rather than interviewing participants; and focusing outputs on community benefit. Eight individual and group research conversations took place with nine Black directors, employees and volunteers working with Black-led community organisations, aged between 19 and 62, living in the UK. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse conversations.

RESULTS

Three themes were developed in relation to what Black-led community organisations do for Black mental health. These are: identify and respond to mental health needs; selectively build relationships with mainstream services; and drive social and systemic improvements. Findings revealed that Black-led community organisations uniquely identify and address mental wellbeing by offering respite from racism, hosting activities, and meeting urgent needs. They navigate and facilitate access to health and social systems, protect communities from harmful services, and advocate for social and systemic change. Drawing on the study design, findings, and the broader literature, we propose three key changes to current funding, community, and research practices. These are a reconsideration of how Black-led organisations' work is valued and measured, a forging of greater collaboration between these organisations, and bolder consideration of how research practice can benefit Black communities.

CONCLUSIONS

Black-led organisations play multiple roles in supporting individual and collective mental health, crucial for mediating the effects of racism and mitigating ethnic inequalities. To our knowledge, this is the first study to both illuminate the critical role of community organisations in promoting Black mental health in the UK and to prioritise participant, and community, benefit throughout the research process.

People, process, and power: implementing advance choice documents for Black people in mental healthcare

OBJECTIVES

Advance Choice Documents (ACDs) have been recommended for inclusion in new mental health legislation for England and Wales based on evidence they reduce compulsory psychiatric admission, with particular benefit for Black people. As Black people disproportionately experience compulsory psychiatric admission in the UK, our aim was to explore potential barriers and enablers to effective ACD implementation for Black people with previous experience of compulsory admission.

METHODS

Six stakeholder workshops and one consensus workshop were held with: Black service users who had previously been involuntarily admitted, carers/supporters of Black service users, and mental health staff. Thematic analysis was conducted on workshop transcripts.

RESULTS

Participants were service users (n = 13), carers/supporters (n = 7), service users and carers/supporters (n = 3), and staff (n = 18). Thematic analysis identified themes of 'training', 'completion', 'access', and 'use' concerning ACD implementation. Stakeholders highlighted the importance of understanding the racialised experience of Black service users for effective ACD implementation. Strong communication between and amongst stakeholders and helpful systems for access were also emphasised. Stakeholders also recommended joint training and independent facilitation of ACDs to address Black service user-staff power imbalances.

CONCLUSIONS

Known enablers and barriers to ACD implementation are important when considering ACDs for Black people, as is explicitly engaging with their experiences holistically, including racialised historical and individual experiences that underline some treatment preferences. Independent facilitation and shifts in service user-staff power dynamics present as key to realising the potential of ACDs to empower Black service users in relation to their care, and in turn to potentially reduce coercive care.

Barriers to Accessing Mental Health Services That Impact Black Canadians: A Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis

Although experiencing lower levels of mental health compared to the general population of Canada, Black Canadians are less inclined to seek help from mental health services. Thus, the aim of this scoping review is to systematically document the current literature on the barriers in accessing mental health services among Black Canadians. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of the existing literature was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus on September 8, 2024. The final dataset consisted of 20 studies published between 1998 and 2023. Findings were synthesized using the sociobehavioural model of health service use to define the subtypes of barriers and the construct of Mental Health Literacy to guide the thematic analysis of the extracted data. Barriers impacting Black Canadians' access of mental health services included language barriers, difficulties in navigating the mental healthcare system, wait times, the quality of resources, and the lack of mental health services in their communities. Themes identified as barriers of use were Mental Health Literacy, Negative Perceptions of the Mental Healthcare System, and Discrimination. Challenges discussed in this review implicate the importance of a multitargeted approach to increasing the access and usage of mental health services among Black Canadians. This review also provides a foundation for research and practice that aims to investigate and develop strategies to promote the mental health of the Black population in Canada. Accordingly, we identify gaps in research-regarding the mental health perceptions, beliefs, and experiences of Black Canadians, required to properly develop interventions that increase mental health service access.

Emergency hospital admissions for stress-related presentations among secondary school-aged minoritised young people in England

BACKGROUND

Minoritised young people face a double burden of discrimination through increased risk of stress and differential treatment access. However, acute care pathways for minoritised young people with urgent mental health needs are poorly understood.

AIMS

To explore variation in stress-related presentations (SRPs) to acute hospitals across racial-ethnic groups in England.

METHOD

We examined rates, distribution, duration and types of SRPs across racial-ethnic groups in a retrospective cohort of 11- to 15-year-olds with one or more emergency hospital admissions between April 2014 and March 2020. SRPs were defined as emergency admissions for potentially psychosomatic symptoms, self-harm and internalising, externalising and thought disorders.

RESULTS

White British (8-38 per 1000 births) and Mixed White-Black (9-42 per 1000 births) young people had highest rates of SRPs, whereas Black African (5-14 per 1000 births), Indian (6-19 per 1000 births) and White other (4-19 per 1000 births) young people had the lowest rates of SRPs. The proportion of readmissions were highest for Pakistani (47.7%), White British (41.4%) and Mixed White-Black (41.3%) groups. Black Other (36.4%) and White Other (35.8%) groups had the lowest proportions of readmissions. The proportion of admission durations ≥3 days was higher for Black Other (16.6%), Bangladeshi (16.3%), Asian Other (15.9%) and Black Caribbean (15.8%) groups than their White British (11.9%) and Indian (11.8%) peers. The type of SRPs varied across racial-ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patterns of SRP admissions systematically differed across racial-ethnic groups, indicative of inequitable triage, assessment and treatment processes. These findings highlight the need for implementation of race equality frameworks to address structural racism in healthcare pathways.

System justification, subjective well-being, and mental health symptoms in members of disadvantaged minority groups

Although system justification-believing that the societal status quo is legitimate and desirable-is positively associated with subjective well-being and mental health outcomes for members of advantaged groups, the picture is more complicated for members of disadvantaged minority groups. According to system justification theory, believing that the social system is legitimate and desirable is a way of coping with one's own and fellow in-group members' state of disadvantage. At the same time, it is also a potential stressor, insofar as it implies that there are deficiencies of the individuals and groups who "fail" to succeed in a fair system. In this article, we quantitatively summarize the results of 34 articles (and 65 effect sizes) identified through computerized searches of scientific databases. Meta-analytic results revealed that system justification among members of disadvantaged minority groups was associated with lower levels of psychological distress (r = -0.131, k = 22, N = 25,506) and higher levels of subjective well-being (r = 0.190, k = 31, N = 172,075) and self-esteem (r = 0.106, k = 12, N = 4,839). These findings are consistent with the notion that, in general, system justification serves the palliative function of reducing distress and improving subjective well-being, most likely by increasing perceptions of personal control and individual mobility and decreasing perceptions of discrimination. At the same time, system justification can come at the expense of mental health when associated with the internalization of inferiority. Suggestions for future research are provided.

Where do "chemical imbalance" beliefs come from? Evaluating the impact of different sources

Introduction

Although the etiology of depression is incredibly complex, the narrative that it is caused by a simple "chemical imbalance" persists in lay settings. We sought to understand where people are exposed to this explanation (i.e., the "source"), and the relative influence of each source.

Methods

A total of 1,219 college students were asked where they had heard of the chemical imbalance explanation and how much they believed this to be true. Independent raters coded open-ended responses and we used self-report measures to capture chemical imbalance belief endorsement.

Results

The most common sources of exposure to this explanation were the classroom, the Internet/media, other people (e.g., friends), and healthcare providers. In a regression analysis, only learning about the chemical imbalance explanation from healthcare providers uniquely predicted the adoption of the chemical imbalance belief. The correlation held even after controlling for depression symptoms, a family history of depression, and having had a diagnosis or treatment of mental health disorder (all of which also uniquely predicted chemical imbalance belief endorsement).

Discussion

These results suggest that healthcare providers play an important role in the dissemination of the chemical imbalance message, which is an oversimplified, scientifically controversial, and potentially treatment-interfering narrative. Interventions directed at healthcare providers may help them engage with more accurate messages.

Socio-demographic variation in diagnosis of and prescribing for common mental illnesses among children and young people during the COVID-19 pandemic: time series analysis of primary care electronic health records

BACKGROUND

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of children and young people (CYP) has been widely reported. Primary care electronic health records were utilised to examine trends in the diagnosing, recording and treating of these common mental disorders by ethnicity and social deprivation in Greater Manchester, England.

METHODS

Time-series analyses conducted using Greater Manchester Care Record (GMCR) data examined all diagnosed episodes of anxiety disorders and depression and prescribing of anxiolytics and antidepressants among patients aged 6-24 years. The 41-month observation period was split into three epochs: Pre-pandemic (1/2019-2/2020); Pandemic Phase 1 (3/2020-6/2021); Pandemic Phase 2 (7/2021-5/2022). Rate ratios for all CYP specific to sex, age, ethnicity, and neighbourhood-level Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintile were modelled using negative binomial regression.

RESULTS

Depression and anxiety disorder rates were highest in females, CYP aged 19-24, and White and 'Other' ethnic groups. During Pandemic Phase 1, rates for these diagnoses fell in all demographic subgroups and then rose to similar levels as those recorded pre-pandemic. In Pandemic Phase 2, rates in Black and Mixed-ethnicity females rose to a significantly greater degree (by 54% and 62%, respectively) than those in White females. Prescribing rates increased throughout the study period, with significantly greater rises observed in non-White females and males. The temporal trends were mostly homogeneous across deprivation quintiles.

CONCLUSION

The observed fluctuations in frequency of recorded common mental illness diagnoses likely reflect service accessibility and patients' differential propensities to consult as well as changing levels of distress and psychopathology in the population. However, psychotropic medication prescribing increased throughout the observation period, possibly indicating a sustained decline in mental health among CYP, and also clinicians' responses to problems presented. The comparatively greater increases in frequencies of diagnosis recording and medication prescribing among ethnic minority groups warrants further investigation.

A study investigating the implementation of NICE recommended psychological interventions for people with psychosis following a psychiatric inpatient admission

The period of time following discharge from an inpatient setting presents a unique window of opportunity for people with psychosis to engage in psychological treatment. In England, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines outline that every person with a schizophrenia diagnosis should be offered individual Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) and Family Intervention (FI). This study aimed to explore rates of offer and receipt of NICE recommended therapies for adults with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder diagnosis in the year following discharge from an inpatient unit. We then investigated possible predictors of therapy offer and receipt. We used a large electronic healthcare records database to perform a secondary data analysis. A generalised linear regression model was used to explore possible predictors. Overall, our results showed low rates of offer and receipt of recommended therapies (Any recommended therapy (CBT only, FI only or CBT + FI) received = 39(8%), offered = 70(15%)). Predictor variable results were identified and discussed. The low level of offer and receipt of recommended therapies is concerning given the recommendations in the NICE guidelines for people with psychosis. Our study highlighted the need for more consistent and reliable procedures for recording this information. Further investigation into the reasons for low levels of implementation overall is important to aid the development of recommendations for how this can be improved.

Intergenerational consequences of racism in the United Kingdom: a qualitative investigation into parents' exposure to racism and offspring mental health and well-being

BACKGROUND

Experiences of racism are linked to negative physical and mental health outcomes among those exposed. According to quantitative research derived mainly from the United States, these negative outcomes can have cascading effects in families, when parents' experiences of racism indirectly impact offspring. New research is warranted for families in the United Kingdom, informed by a qualitative approach to canvassing community knowledge and perspectives, exploring how existing findings relate to lived experiences.

METHOD

We conducted four online focus groups with 14 parents of school-aged children and 14 adolescents who had experienced racism in the United Kingdom. Participants were asked what children know of parents' experiences of racism, and how these experiences can impact parent-child interactions, mental health and well-being. Focus group recordings were transcribed, data coded and analysed through iterative categorisation.

RESULTS

Analyses drew four themes from participants' insights. Together, themes illuminated the pervasive nature of racism experienced by some families in the United Kingdom. Parent and child experiences of racism were connected and co-occurring, with indirect effects impacting mental health and well-being in both generations. These experiences were linked to both positive and negative changes in parenting behaviour and parent-child relationships, which could be moderated by intersecting identities such as the parent's generational status for immigration to the United Kingdom. Social cohesion, safe spaces and education programmes were highlighted for future intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings corroborate existing literature, while further emphasising a broader bidirectional picture, requiring a family system and intersectional approach to understanding the mental health impact of racism in families. Avenues for future research are discussed to support development of equitable intervention and support strategies to prevent racism and support those affected.

Impact of a prehabilitation and recovery programme on emotional well-being in individuals undergoing cancer surgery: a multi-perspective qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Prehabilitation and recovery programmes aim to optimise patients' physical fitness and mental well-being before, during and after cancer treatment. This paper aimed to understand the impact of such a programme on emotional well-being in individuals undergoing cancer surgery. The programme was multi-modal, containing physical activity, well-being and nutritional support.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 individuals who participated in a prehabilitation and recovery programme. Twenty-four health care staff involved in referral completed an online survey. An inductive, thematic analysis was conducted, integrating perspectives of patients and staff, structured with the Framework approach.

RESULTS

Patients seemed to experience emotional benefits from the programme, appearing less anxious and more confident in their ability to cope with treatment. They seemed to value having something positive to focus on and control over an aspect of treatment. Ongoing, implicit psychological support provided by Exercise Specialists, who were perceived as expert, available and caring, seemed valued. Some patients appeared to appreciate opportunities to talk about cancer with peers and professionals. Discomfort with talking about cancer with other people, outside of the programme, was expressed.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in a prehabilitation and recovery programme appeared to yield valuable emotional well-being benefits, even without referral to specialist psychological support.

STUDY REGISTRATION

The study protocol was uploaded onto the Open Science Framework 24 September 2020 ( https://osf.io/347qj/ ).

Predicting substance use disorder treatment follow-ups and relapse across the continuum of care at a single behavioral health center

INTRODUCTION

Substance use disorder is often a chronic condition, and its treatment requires patient access to a continuum of care, including inpatient, residential, partial hospitalization, intensive outpatient, and outpatient programs. Ideally, patients complete treatment at the most suitable level for their immediate individual needs, then transition to the next appropriate level. In practice, however, attrition rates are high, as many patients discharge before successfully completing a treatment program or struggle to transition to follow-up care after program discharge. Previous studies analyzed up to two programs at a time in single-center datasets, meaning no studies have assessed patient attrition and follow-up behavior across all five levels of substance use treatment programs in parallel.

METHODS

To address this major gap, this retrospective study collected patient demographics, enrollment, discharge, and outcomes data across five substance use treatment levels at a large Midwestern psychiatric hospital from 2017 to 2019. Data analyses used descriptive statistics and regression analyses.

RESULTS

Analyses found several differences in treatment engagement based on patient-level variables. Inpatients were more likely to identify as Black or female compared to lower-acuity programs. Patients were less likely to step down in care if they were younger, Black, had Medicare coverage were discharging from inpatient treatment, or had specific behavioral health diagnoses. Patients were more likely to relapse if they were male or did not engage in follow-up SUD treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies should assess mechanisms by which these variables influence treatment access, develop programmatic interventions that encourage appropriate transitions between programs, and determine best practices for increasing access to treatment.

Five-year illness trajectories across racial groups in the UK following a first episode psychosis

PURPOSE

Psychosis disproportionally affects ethnic minority groups in high-income countries, yet evidence of disparities in outcomes following intensive early intervention service (EIS) for First Episode Psychosis (FEP) is less conclusive. We investigated 5-year clinical and social outcomes of young people with FEP from different racial groups following EIS care.

METHOD

Data were analysed from the UK-wide NIHR SUPEREDEN study. The sample at baseline (n = 978) included White (n = 750), Black (n = 71), and Asian (n = 157) individuals, assessed during the 3 years of EIS, and up to 2 years post-discharge (n = 296; Black [n = 23]; Asian [n = 52] and White [n = 221]). Outcome trajectories were modelled for psychosis symptoms (positive, negative, and general), functioning, and depression, using linear mixed effect models (with random intercept and slopes), whilst controlling for social deprivation. Discharge service was also explored across racial groups, 2 years following EIS.

RESULTS

Variation in linear growth over time was accounted for by racial group status for psychosis symptoms-positive (95% CI [0.679, 1.235]), negative (95% CI [0.315, 0.783]), and general (95% CI [1.961, 3.428])-as well as for functioning (95% CI [11.212, 17.677]) and depressive symptoms (95% CI [0.261, 0.648]). Social deprivation contributed to this variance. Black individuals experienced greater levels of deprivation (p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.187, 0.624]). Finally, there was a greater likelihood for Asian (OR = 3.04; 95% CI [2.050, 4.498]) and Black individuals (OR = 2.47; 95% CI [1.354, 4.520]) to remain in secondary care by follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest variations in long-term clinical and social outcomes following EIS across racial groups; social deprivation contributed to this variance. Black and Asian individuals appear to make less improvement in long-term recovery and are less likely to be discharged from mental health services. Replication is needed in large, complete data, to fully understand disparities and blind spots to care.