Guideline for acute therapy and management of anaphylaxis: S2 Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Society of Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Academy of Allergology and Environmental Medicine (DAAU), the German Professional Association of Pediatricians (BVKJ), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), the German Society of Pharmacology (DGP), the German Society for Psychosomatic Medicine (DGPM), the German Working Group of Anaphylaxis Training and Education (AGATE) and the patient organization German Allergy and Asthma Association (DAAB)

Evaluation of a translational swine model of respiratory hypersensitivity induced by exposure to Phleum pratense pollen allergens

Introduction

Asthma is a disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the airway mucosa that causes tissue remodeling and a reversible decrease in airflow. The causative agent of asthma is still unknown; however, several studies have shown that environmental factors such as allergens present in pollens are involved. This project's objective was to develop and evaluate a model of respiratory hypersensitivity in Vietnamese minipigs, which is closer in many aspects to humans than rodents, using Phleum pratense allergenic pollen extract.

Methods

In this hypersensitivity model, human-like signs were observed during a challenge with the allergens. Intradermal and passive anaphylaxis tests confirmed that specific IgE mediated the response.

Results

Significant changes in lung tissue remodeling, high levels of serum allergen-specific IgA, IgG, and to a lesser extent IgE were found in the sensitized pigs, which could favor tolerance and pathogenesis. However, since chronic pathology did not develop, elevated levels of cytokines were not proven.

Discussion

This work demonstrated that the immunization protocol in this experimental model can induce a type I respiratory hypersensitivity-like response mediated by antigen-specific IgE, with pathophysiological similarities to those of humans and prospective for translational basic and applied research.

Drug-Induced Serious Cutaneous Reactions in Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can lead to hospital admission and can be fatal, but some of them are preventable. This study aimed to determine the types and frequencies of serious cutaneous ADRs and the methods employed to manage and prevent them, as well as to assess the factors related to their seriousness. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted retrospectively on inpatients and outpatients at a tertiary care hospital. All data were collected from the medical records database over a period of 3 years. Serious cutaneous ADRs were identified in the hospital database using the International Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10). Results: A total of 2151 cases were retrieved using the ICD-10, and 436 patients were randomly selected for this study. Of these, 218 patients experienced ADRs (50.0%). The major clinical symptoms of the eight serious ADRs included anaphylaxis (38.5%) and urticaria (30.2%). The most commonly suspected drug group was antibiotics (45.0%). The main methods of ADR management were drug treatment (84.4%) and drug withdrawal (81.2%). The primary method of ADR prevention was patient drug allergy cards (52.3%). Factors affecting the severity of ADRs were having an underlying condition (p = 0.031) and the concomitant use of drugs (p = 0.044). Conclusions: Anaphylaxis was the most common serious ADR. Patients with underlying diseases and those taking concomitant drugs are more likely to present with serious ADRs. The prevention of serious ADRs should be promoted at all levels in hospitals to reduce harm and prevent their reoccurrence.

Age- and Elicitor-Dependent Characterization of Hymenoptera Venom-Induced Anaphylaxis in Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Hymenoptera venom is one of the most frequent causes of anaphylaxis. Studies from adults indicate the clinical profiles and risk factors of Hymenoptera venom-induced anaphylaxis (VIA). Much less is known about pediatric VIA.

OBJECTIVE

To understand elicitor- and age-related factors determining pediatric VIA by analyzing data from the anaphylaxis registry.

METHODS

We selected pediatric VIA, pediatric food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA), and adult VIA cohorts from the anaphylaxis registry and performed a comparative data analysis regarding elicitors, symptoms, and management.

RESULTS

We identified 725 pediatric patients with VIA, 3,149 with pediatric FIA, and 5,534 with adult VIA. In pediatric VIA, boys were more frequently affected, atopy was not increased, and the onset of the reaction after exposure was fast (≤30 min; 91%) compared with pediatric FIA. Symptoms in pediatric VIA were age dependent, and although respiratory symptoms occurred most frequently besides skin symptoms in both pediatric patients with VIA and FIA, cardiovascular symptoms were more frequently reported in pediatric patients with VIA than pediatric patients with FIA. The analysis of pediatric versus adult VIA revealed clear differences in the frequency of involved organ systems (skin: 93% vs 78%; respiratory: 77% vs 64%; and cardiovascular: 61% vs 85%). For both pediatric and adult VIA, the rates of adrenaline application by a professional were low (29% vs 31%) but hospitalization rates were higher in children than in adults (61% vs 42%). Venom immunotherapy was frequently initiated regardless of age (78% each).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric VIA is more frequent in boys, symptoms are age dependent, and hospitalization is often required. Adrenaline should be applied according to current guidelines. Venom immunotherapy is an important treatment option in pediatric VIA and should be considered in severely affected children.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with mannan-conjugated birch pollen allergoids

BACKGROUND

There is still great need to develop new strategies to improve the efficacy of allergen immunotherapies with optimal safety standards for patients. A new promising approach is to couple allergoids to mannan. The objective of this phase IIa/IIb study was to identify the optimal dose of mannan-conjugated birch pollen allergoids for the short-course treatment of birch pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

METHODS

For this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study, 246 birch pollen-allergic adults received 0.5 mL placebo or 1000, 3000 or 10,000 mTU/mL of mannan-conjugated birch pollen allergoids at five pre-seasonal visits. Efficacy was assessed by comparing allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and use of anti-allergic medication during the peak of the birch pollen season 2020. Immunologic, tolerability and safety effects were also analysed.

RESULTS

The highest dose of mannan-conjugated birch pollen allergoids reduced the combined symptom and medication score during the peak birch pollen season by a median of 24.7% compared to placebo. The production of Bet v 1 specific IgG4 significantly increased in a dose-dependent manner (3.6- and 4.5-fold) in the 3000 and 10,000 mTU/mL groups. The Bet v 1 specific IgE/IgG4 ratio was also strongly reduced (up to -70%). No fatalities nor serious adverse events were reported, and no adrenaline was used. In total, four systemic reactions occurred (two grade I and two grade II).

CONCLUSION

All doses of mannan-conjugated birch pollen allergoids can be considered as safe. Since the application of 10,000 mTU/mL resulted in the highest efficacy, this dose qualifies for further investigation.

Allergic Reaction to a Commercially Available Insect Snack Caused by House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Tropomyosin

SCOPE

Edible insects contain allergens with potential cross-reactivity to other invertebrates. Here, this study examines IgE-reactive proteins in a house cricket snack (Acheta domesticus) leading to an allergic reaction in a 27-year old man followed by a similar reaction days later after eating shrimps.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Prick to prick tests verify the IgE-mediated allergy to crickets and skin prick testing confirms a type I sensitization to house dust mite without any clinical relevance for the patient, and to shrimp extracts, but is negative for several other foods. Serological testing reveals a sensitization to shrimps, shrimp tropomyosin, and house dust mite tropomyosin. IgE-immunodetection shows that the cricket allergic patient is sensitized to two proteins of 45 and >97 kDa using aqueous control cricket extract, but to only one protein at around 45 kDa when using the causative, seasoned insect snack extract. Mass spectrometry data and IgE-inhibition experiments clearly identify this protein belonging to the tropomyosin allergen family.

CONCLUSION

This case report suggests that cricket tropomyosin may be an elicitor of allergic reactions even in previously not allergic patients, although it cannot be excluded the patient reacted additionally to other ingredients of the snack.

Perioperative Management Conundrum for a Case With Multiple Commonly Used Drug Hypersensitivity

Perioperative hypersensitivity reactions vary from mild to potentially fatal anaphylaxis, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Most of the perioperative hypersensitivity and allergic reactions are attributed to antibiotics, antiseptic solutions, latex, and opioids. In the current thrust for opioid-free anesthesia, owing to its multiple advantages, paracetamol and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents play a significant role in multi-modal pain and inflammatory response management. Nearly nine out of ten individuals experience postoperative pain, one-third experience postoperative nausea and vomiting, and one-fourth experience fever, irrespective of surgery and type of anesthesia, often as an inflammatory response. While perioperative hypersensitivity reactions are common, a patient allergic to multiple commonly used drugs for the treatment of pain, fever, acid-peptic disorder, and nausea and vomiting is scarce. Such cases pose a great challenge in perioperative management. A 14-year-old male child with a traumatic foot drop planned for tibialis posterior tendon transfer developed an allergic reaction with mild fever following an injection of Ranitidine and Ondansetron in the preoperative area. Surgery was deferred and was investigated for allergy profile testing for commonly used drugs, which showed high IgE levels and moderate to severe hypersensitivity for diclofenac and paracetamol. The patient was operated on after one month under spinal anesthesia, avoiding ranitidine, ondansetron, diclofenac, and paracetamol. The following morning, he developed a high-grade fever (102.3° F), which did not resolve with conservative measures. Hypersensitivity and allergic reactions to NSAIDs are reported in the literature. While there are multiple drugs available as NSAIDs, cross-sensitivity or allergy to other drugs within the same group, and even chemically related groups, is also another possibility that needs to be considered while managing such patients. Mefenamic acid controlled the fever, and the child was discharged home after 48 hours of observation. However, the case posed a great perioperative management dilemma; the present report intends to highlight and discuss it.

[Antibiotic allergies: targeted approach in suspected β‑lactam allergy]

Allergic reactions to antibiotics belong to hypersensitivity drug reactions and can trigger both immunoglobulin E-mediated symptoms and T cell-mediated symptoms. Skin manifestations are the most common symptoms. Although reporting a penicillin allergy results in considerable restrictions in the treatment of acute infections, which may be associated with poor treatment outcomes, in most cases the label 'penicillin allergy' is not called into question or critically reviewed. However, in 85-90% of patients, 'penicillin allergy' constitutes a mislabeling of a non-specific intolerance reaction that does not pose a risk to the patient when re-exposed to penicillins. Careful history taking, an evaluation of manifestations in the past, and easy-to-perform initial diagnostic steps are crucial in differentiating non-specific intolerance reactions from penicillin allergy sensu stricto. Thus, a penicillin de-labeling strategy allows for optimized antibiotic therapy in the event of a future infection. Although allergic cross-reactivity between different β‑lactam antibiotics can occur, the risk for a severe cross-reactivity is dependent on chemical properties of the specific β‑lactam. Published cross-reactivity tables can help in risk stratification and choice of alternative β‑lactam agents.

Investigation of the underuse of adrenaline (epinephrine) and prognosis among patients with anaphylaxis at emergency department admission

Background

Anaphylaxis is a potentially fatal condition; in severe cases of anaphylaxis, the cardiovascular system is often heavily involved. Adrenaline (epinephrine) is a cornerstone of the initial treatment of anaphylaxis. The use of epinephrine remains below expectations in clinical practice. Whether the underuse of epinephrine affects the prognosis of patients with anaphylaxis is still unclear.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included patients with anaphylaxis between 2011 and 2020 who were admitted to an emergency department (ED) in Taiwan. All patients were divided into two groups based on the use of epinephrine (or not), and we compared the demographic characteristics, allergens, clinical manifestations, management, and patient outcomes.

Results

We reviewed the records of 314 subjects (216 males, 98 females; mean age: 52.78 ± 16.02 years) who visited our ED due to anaphylaxis; 107 (34.1%) and 207 (65.9%) patients were categorized into the epinephrine use group and the non-epinephrine use group, respectively. Arrival via ambulance (p = 0.019), hypotension (p = 0.002), airway compromise (p < 0.001) and altered consciousness (p < 0.001) were the deciding factors for epinephrine use among anaphylactic patients in the ED. The epinephrine use group had higher rates of other inotropic agent usage and fluid challenge. More than 90% of patients received bed rest, steroids, antihistamines, and monitoring. The epinephrine use group had a longer ED length of stay (387.64 ± 374.71 vs. 313.06 ± 238.99 min, p = 0.03) and a greater need of hospitalization. Among all severe symptoms, hypotension was the most tolerated decision factor for not using epinephrine. In this retrospective analysis, some patients with serious anaphylaxis did not experience adverse outcomes or death even without the use of epinephrine at ED admission. Emergent care focuses first on the airway, breathing, and circulation (ABC) and may compensate for the underusage of epinephrine. This could be the reason why epinephrine was underused among patients with anaphylaxis in the ED.

Conclusion

In summary, early ABC management continues to play an important role in treating patients with severe anaphylaxis, even when epinephrine is not immediately available in clinical scenarios.

[Prehospital emergency anesthesia in adults : Current recommendations for performing prehospital emergency anesthesia based on the recommendations for prehospital emergency anesthesia in adults]

The frequency of prehospital emergency anesthesia in Germany is around 2-3% of all emergency medical missions. The Association of the Scientific Medical Societies of Germany (AWMF) has published guidelines for the implementation of a prehospital emergency anesthesia. The purpose of this article is to highlight important aspects from these guidelines and to present the implementation and special features for specific patient groups. A case study is intended to illustrate that the preclinical setting can provide various facets that make a certain amount of experience and expertise indispensable. The article emphasizes that clear standard situations are not always present and that there are some challenges in the preclinical setting. Therefore, mastering the content of prehospital emergency anesthesia and the manual skills of induction of anesthesia are essential and obligatory for the emergency team.

[Antibiotic allergies: targeted approach in suspected β‑lactam allergy]

Allergic reactions to antibiotics belong to hypersensitivity drug reactions and can trigger both immunoglobulin E-mediated symptoms and T cell-mediated symptoms. Skin manifestations are the most common symptoms. Although reporting a penicillin allergy results in considerable restrictions in the treatment of acute infections, which may be associated with poor treatment outcomes, in most cases the label 'penicillin allergy' is not called into question or critically reviewed. However, in 85-90% of patients, 'penicillin allergy' constitutes a mislabeling of a non-specific intolerance reaction that does not pose a risk to the patient when re-exposed to penicillins. Careful history taking, an evaluation of manifestations in the past, and easy-to-perform initial diagnostic steps are crucial in differentiating non-specific intolerance reactions from penicillin allergy sensu stricto. Thus, a penicillin de-labeling strategy allows for optimized antibiotic therapy in the event of a future infection. Although allergic cross-reactivity between different β‑lactam antibiotics can occur, the risk for a severe cross-reactivity is dependent on chemical properties of the specific β‑lactam. Published cross-reactivity tables can help in risk stratification and choice of alternative β‑lactam agents.

[Angioedema in the emergency department]

Acute angioedema is mostly found in the head and neck region. Therefore, it can be life threatening by potentially endangering air way patency. Pathophysiologically angioedemas can be divided into mast cell-mediated or bradykinin-mediated forms. Differentiation is essential due to the different therapeutic strategies. In cases of doubt, initial therapy with adrenalin, antihistamines, and glucocorticoids should be initiated. This initial emergency treatment is comparable to the treatment of allergic reactions. For diagnosed or suspected hereditary angioedema, specific treatments are available. For drug-associated forms, immediate and life-long cessation of the medication is crucial. In the emergency situation, diagnosis can only be based on medical history and clinical symptoms. Recognition of impending airway obstruction and securing the airway is of highest priority; final diagnosis must be confirmed later.

Idiopathic Anaphylaxis? Analysis of Data from the Anaphylaxis Registry for West Pomerania Province, Poland

The most common causes of anaphylaxis, according to various authors and depending on the age of the studied groups, are: Hymenoptera venom, food, and medications. Unfortunately, we are not always able to indicate the cause of anaphylaxis. There are data in the literature where as many as 41% of all cases are idiopathic anaphylaxis. Since the introduction of new diagnostic methods such as molecular diagnostics (MD) in our centre, the percentage of idiopathic anaphylaxis in the Anaphylaxis Register has significantly decreased. The purpose of this study was to identify possible causes of idiopathic anaphylaxis in patients with a history of moderate to severe anaphylactic reactions. After using MD, the causative agent was found in another 29 people. The proportion of people with idiopathic anaphylaxis in the Registry decreased from 9.2% to 3.5%. There were no significant differences in the incidence, although men appear to be slightly more common in primary idiopathic anaphylaxis. The mean age of primary idiopathic anaphylaxis was 40 years, but this was as high as 51 for anaphylaxis with alpha-gal allergy. Exercise may or may not be present as a cofactor despite its established role, e.g., in wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA). In most of the analyzed cases, i.e., 70%, the reaction took place within an hour. The longest time interval from exposure to the development of symptoms is in the case of alpha-gal allergy; in this analysis, it was at least 5 h after ingestion of the so-called "red meat". Patients are not aware of the disease, or further attacks cannot be prevented. As many as 80% had idiopathic anaphylaxis prior to visiting the centre, and 80% developed anaphylaxis after visiting the centre, which emphasizes the need to not stop the medical team in their search for the causes. As many as 93% of cases required medical intervention, of which adrenaline was used only in 34.5%, antihistamines in 86%, systemic glucocorticosteroids (sCS) in 75%, and fluids in 62% of cases. A total of 83% of patients received an emergency kit for self-administration. Idiopathic anaphylaxis can be resolved as known-cause anaphylaxis after a thorough medical history and, if possible, without exposing the patient after using appropriate, modern in vitro diagnostic methods, including molecular diagnostics. The diagnosis of idiopathic anaphylaxis should extend the diagnosis to include alpha-gal syndrome, LTP syndrome and WDEIA.

International recommendations on epinephrine auto-injector doses often differ from standard weight-based guidance: a review and clinical proposals

BACKGROUND

In anaphylaxis, the dosing of injectable epinephrine in medical settings has been arbitrarily recommended to be 0.01 mg/kg of body weight. For ethical reasons, there have been no dose-response studies or double-blind studies performed on patients with active anaphylaxis. Intramuscular delivery of epinephrine has been the standard. Auto-injectors for use in the treatment of anaphylaxis are available in four strengths (0.1, 0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 mg). However, in many countries, only the 0.15 and 0.3 mg strengths are available. Consequently, many adult, heavy patients are prescribed the 0.3 mg dose, which may result in only one-fifth to one-third of the recommended weight-based dose being administered in heavy patients experiencing anaphylaxis. Underdosing may have therefore contributed to mortality in anaphylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

To review the doses of epinephrine recommended for the treatment of anaphylaxis in the community, and assess whether recommendations should be made to increase dosing for heavy adult patients in hopes of avoiding future deaths from anaphylaxis.

METHODS

We reviewed multiple national and international recommendations for the dosing of epinephrine. We also reviewed the literature on adverse drug reactions from epinephrine, lethal doses of epinephrine, and epinephrine dose-finding studies.

RESULTS

The majority of national and regional professional societies and authorities recommend epinephrine delivered by auto-injectors at doses far lower than the generally accepted therapeutic dose of 0.01 mg/kg body weight. Furthermore, we found that the recommendations vary even within regions themselves.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest prescribing more appropriate doses of epinephrine auto-injectors based on weight-based recommendations. There may be some exceptions, such as for patients with heart disease. We hypothesize that these recommendations will lead to improved outcomes of anaphylaxis.

Factors influencing the safety of outpatient coronary CT angiography: a clinical registry study

OBJECTIVES

Since the safety of coronary CT angiography (CTA) is of great importance, especially with regard to widening indications and increasing morbidity, the aim of this study was to assess influencing factors.

METHODS

Patients undergoing coronary CTA in a third-generation dual-source CT in a radiological centre were included in a clinical registry. Up to 20 mg metoprolol was administered intravenously to attain a heart rate ≤65/min. Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) was administered in doses of 0.8 mg and 0.4 mg. Blood pressure was measured before the administration and after the CTA.

RESULTS

Out of 5500 consecutive patients (3194 men, 62.3 (54.9-70.0) years), adverse events occurred in 68 patients (1.2%) with mild anaphylactoid reactions (0.4%), vasovagal symptoms (0.3%) and extravasation (0.3%) being most frequent. Anti-allergic drugs were given in 17 patients, atropine in 3 patients and volume in 1 patient. Drug administration resulted in a significant mean arterial pressure decline (96.0 (88.3-106.0) vs 108.7 (99.7-117.3) mmHg; p<0.001). Patients who suffered systolic blood pressure drops >20 mmHg or >40 mmHg were older (66.5 (58.6-73.3) vs 60.5 (53.6-68.3) years; 70.2 (63.3-76.5) vs 62.1 (54.7-69.6) years), more often male (65.1% vs 54.4%; 68.9% vs 57.3%) and had higher Agatston score equivalents (83.0 (2.0-432.0) vs 15.0 (0.0-172.0); 163.0 (16.3-830.8) vs 25.0 (0.0-220.0); all p<0.001). GTN dose reduction lowered the fraction of patients suffering from blood pressure drops >20 mmHg or >40 mmHg from 34.5% to 27.4% and from 6.1% to 3.5% (both p<0.001), respectively. The proportion of coronary segments with impaired image quality did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary CTA with intravenous beta-blocker administration is a safe procedure in an outpatient setting as adverse events are rare and mostly mild. Reduced GTN doses can further improve safety by lowering the rate of significant blood pressure drops, which occurred especially in elderly men with increased plaque burden.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03815123.

Immunotherapies in the treatment of immunoglobulin E‑mediated allergy: Challenges and scope for innovation (Review)

Immunoglobulin E (IgE)‑mediated allergy or hypersensitivity reactions are generally defined as an unwanted severe symptomatic immunological reaction that occurs due to shattered or untrained peripheral tolerance of the immune system. Allergen‑specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only therapeutic strategy that can provide a longer‑lasting symptomatic and clinical break from medications in IgE‑mediated allergy. Immunotherapies against allergic diseases comprise a successive increasing dose of allergen, which helps in developing the immune tolerance against the allergen. AITs exerttheirspecial effectiveness directly or indirectly by modulating the regulator and effector components of the immune system. The number of success stories of AIT is still limited and it canoccasionallyhave a severe treatment‑associated adverse effect on patients. Therefore, the formulation used for AIT should be appropriate and effective. The present review describes the chronological evolution of AIT, and provides a comparative account of the merits and demerits of different AITs by keeping in focus the critical guiding factors, such as sustained allergen tolerance, duration of AIT, probability of mild to severe allergic reactions and dose of allergen required to effectuate an effective AIT. The mechanisms by which regulatory T cells suppress allergen‑specific effector T cells and how loss of natural tolerance against innocuous proteins induces allergy are reviewed. The present review highlights the major AIT bottlenecks and the importantregulatory requirements for standardized AIT formulations. Furthermore, the present reviewcalls attention to the problem of 'polyallergy', which is still a major challenge for AIT and the emerging concept of 'component‑resolved diagnosis' (CRD) to address the issue. Finally, a prospective strategy for upgrading CRD to the next dimension is provided, and a potential technology for delivering thoroughly standardized AIT with minimal risk is discussed.

[Stocked medications in emergency medical service vehicles staffed by physicians-is prehospital treatment according to current guidelines possible?]

Background

High quality of care in prehospital emergency medicine is characterized by guideline-based therapy. The basic prerequisite for this therapy is the availability of the required drugs in accordance with the current guideline recommendations. It is currently unclear whether this is guaranteed nationwide. There is no uniform standard regarding which drugs must be stocked in emergency medical services (EMS) vehicles staffed by physicians in Germany. The aim of the present study is to identify important diagnoses and the drugs required for their therapy. In a second step, medical directors throughout Germany were interviewed about current drugs available in their physician-staffed EMS vehicles and these were compared with the previously defined diagnosis-dependent drug lists.

Materials and methods

After a structured guideline search, tracer diagnoses were defined and relevant drugs were assigned to them. The levels of evidence and recommendations were also considered. In a second step, this was compared with the current drugs available in physician-staffed EMS vehicles.

Results

A total of 156 different medications were identified. The median number of medications stocked was 58; the minimum number of medications stocked was 35 at one site, while multiple sites stocked a maximum of 77 medications .

Discussion

The present study investigated stocked medications in physician-staffed EMS vehicles. Overall, compared to a 2011 study, drug availability has improved. Most of the recommended medications are available in physician-staffed vehicles in Germany. The data from this study can be used by EMS throughout Germany to evaluate their preparedness.

A Review of Push-Dose Vasopressors in the Peri-operative and Critical Care Setting

During hospitalization, the risk of hypotension and associated sequelae remain important considerations for patient outcomes. The use of push-dose vasopressors (PDP) outside of the operating room has increased in recent years to combat the negative effects of hypotension. This narrative review evaluates the utility of PDP in its traditional perioperative setting as well as in areas of increasing use such as the emergency department and intensive care unit. Articles evaluating PDP highlight successful increases in blood pressure with all agents but differ in rates of adverse events and most lack direct comparison of PDP agents in regard to safety and efficacy. Agents utilized as PDP, including epinephrine, phenylephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, and ephedrine vary in mechanism of action, onset of action, and duration of action. These variations in pharmacology along with published literature may lead to differences in the preferred PDP for various clinical scenarios. Many adverse events associated with PDP have been due to dosing errors highlighting the importance of education surrounding the use of these agents. Additional research is necessary to further elucidate the risks and benefits of PDP in clinical practice, and to determine which PDP is truly preferred. Careful consideration should be given when determining the appropriateness of this administration method of vasopressors in various clinical scenarios.

A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Emergency Management of Anaphylaxis (2020)

Background: For anaphylaxis, a life-threatening allergic reaction, the incidence rate was presented to have increased from the beginning of the 21st century. Underdiagnosis and undertreatment of anaphylaxis are public health concerns. Objective: This guideline aimed to provide high-quality and evidence-based recommendations for the emergency management of anaphylaxis. Method: The panel of health professionals from fifteen medical areas selected twenty-five clinical questions and formulated the recommendations with the supervision of four methodologists. We collected evidence by conducting systematic literature retrieval and using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: This guideline made twenty-five recommendations that covered the diagnosis, preparation, emergency treatment, and post-emergency management of anaphylaxis. We recommended the use of a set of adapted diagnostic criteria from the American National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network (NIAID/FAAN), and developed a severity grading system that classified anaphylaxis into four grades. We recommended epinephrine as the first-line treatment, with specific doses and routes of administration for different severity of anaphylaxis or different conditions. Proper dosage is critical in the administration of epinephrine, and the monitor is important in the IV administration. Though there was only very low or low-quality evidence supported the use of glucocorticoids and H1 antagonists, we still weakly recommended them as second-line medications. We could not make a well-directed recommendation regarding premedication for preventing anaphylaxis since it is difficult to weigh the concerns and potential effects. Conclusion: For the emergency management of anaphylaxis we conclude that: • NIAID/FAAN diagnostic criteria and the four-tier grading system should be used for the diagnosis • Prompt and proper administration of epinephrine is critical.

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines on Anaphylaxis

The Wilderness Medical Society convened a panel to review the literature and develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of anaphylaxis, with an emphasis on a field-based perspective. The review also included literature regarding the definition, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and prevention of anaphylaxis. The increasing prevalence of food allergies in the United States raises concern for a corresponding rise in the incidence of anaphylaxis. Intramuscular epinephrine is the primary treatment for anaphylaxis and should be administered before adjunctive treatments such as antihistamines, corticosteroids, and inhaled β agonists. For outdoor schools and organizations, selecting a method to administer epinephrine in the field is based on considerations of cost, safety, and first responder training, as well as federal guidelines and state-specific laws.

Workplace-related inhalation test - Specific inhalation challenge: S2k Guideline of the German Society for Occupational and Environmental Medicine e.V. (DGAUM), the German Society for Pneumology and Respiratory Medicine e.V. (DGP) and the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology e.V. (DGAKI)

Not available.

Tele-EMS physicians improve life-threatening conditions during prehospital emergency missions

Almost seven years ago, a telemedicine system was established as an additional component of the city of Aachen's emergency medical service (EMS). It allows paramedics to engage in an immediate consultation with an EMS physician at any time. The system is not meant to replace the EMS physician on the scene during life-threatening emergencies. The aim of this study was to analyze teleconsultations during life-threatening missions and evaluate whether they improve patient care. Telemedical EMS (tele-EMS) physician consultations that occurred over the course of four years were evaluated. Missions were classified as involving potentially life-threatening conditions based on at least one of the following criteria: documented patient severity score, life-threatening vital signs, the judgement of the onsite EMS physician involved in the mission, or definite life-threatening diagnoses. The proportion of vital signs indicating that the patient was in a life-threatening condition was analyzed as the primary outcome at the start and end of the tele-EMS consultation. The secondary outcome parameters were the administered drug doses, tracer diagnoses made by the onsite EMS physicians during the missions, and quality of the documentation of the missions. From January 2015 to December 2018, a total of 10,362 tele-EMS consultations occurred; in 4,293 (41.4%) of the missions, the patient was initially in a potentially life-threatening condition. Out of those, a total of 3,441 (80.2%) missions were performed without an EMS physician at the scene. Records of 2,007 patients revealed 2,234 life-threatening vital signs of which 1,465 (65.6%) were remedied during the teleconsultation. Significant improvement was detected for oxygen saturation, hypotonia, tachy- and bradycardia, vigilance states, and hypoglycemia. Teleconsultation during missions involving patients with life-threatening conditions can significantly improve those patients' vital signs. Many potentially life-threatening cases could be handled by a tele-EMS physician as they did not require any invasive interventions that needed to be performed by an onsite EMS physician. Diagnoses of myocardial infarction, cardiac pulmonary edema, or malignant dysrhythmias necessitate the presence of onsite EMS physicians. Even during missions involving patients with life-threatening conditions, teleconsultation was feasible and often accessed by the paramedics.

What's New in the Treatment of Urticaria and Angioedema

Chronic urticaria and angioedema are diseases often managed by Allergy and Immunology specialists. Recent international guidelines have outlined a stepwise approach to management of patients using dose escalation of second-generation antihistamines followed by use of omalizumab and finally cyclosporine in more refractory cases. In select patients (those with refractory chronic urticaria), nonbiologic alternative medications with anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressant activity may be considered. Angioedema without wheals may have several different pathophysiologic mechanisms. Optimal management of mast cell-mediated angioedema is less clear but is often managed similar to chronic spontaneous urticaria. Drug-induced angioedema due to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is a common cause of angioedema in the emergency department. Although bradykinin is thought to be a primary mediator for this type of angioedema, studies of targeted therapies have been generally disappointing. In contrast, several targeted therapies have been proven successful using acute and preventive approaches for management of hereditary angioedema. Further developments, including novel biologics, novel oral therapies, and gene therapy approaches, may hopefully continue to broaden therapeutic options to ensure optimal individual management of patients with hereditary angioedema.

Emergency medicine updates: Anaphylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Anaphylaxis is a potentially deadly condition that requires emergent therapy. While frequently treated in the emergency department (ED), recent evidence updates may improve the diagnosis and management of this condition.

OBJECTIVE

This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis for the emergency clinician.

DISCUSSION

The presentation of anaphylaxis can vary. Current diagnostic criteria can be helpful when evaluating patients for anaphylaxis, though multiple criteria exist. While the most common causes of anaphylaxis include medications, insect venom, and foods, recent literature has identified an IgE antibody response to mammalian galactose alpha-1,3-galactose, known as alpha-gal anaphylaxis. Epinephrine is the first-line therapy and is given in doses of 0.01 mg/kg (up to 0.5 mg in adults) intramuscularly (IM) in the anterolateral thigh. Intravenous (IV) epinephrine administration is recommended in patients refractory to IM epinephrine and IV fluids, or those with cardiovascular collapse. Antihistamines and glucocorticoids should not delay administration of epinephrine and do not demonstrate a significant reduction in risk of biphasic reactions. Biphasic reactions may affect 1-7% of patients with anaphylaxis. Risk factors for biphasic reaction include severe initial presentation and repeated doses of epinephrine. Disposition of patients with anaphylaxis requires consideration of several factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency clinicians must be aware of current updates in the evaluation and management of this disease.

„A-Probleme“ des nichttraumatologischen Schockraummanagements

Im Rahmen des nichttraumatologischen Schockraummanagements zur Versorgung kritisch kranker Patienten werden akute Störungen der Vitalfunktionen rasch detektiert und interdisziplinär behandelt. Beim „primary survey“ dient das etablierte ABCDE-Schema der strukturierten Untersuchung aller relevanten Vitalparameter, Störungen werden hierbei sofort therapiert. „A-Probleme“ gehen mit einer drohenden Atemwegsverlegung und damit einer konsekutiven Hypoxie einher. Unterschiedlichste Pathologien können hier zugrunde liegen, meist ist aber zunächst eine symptomatische Therapie, also die Sicherung der Atemwege, die entscheidende Notfallmaßnahme. Ein strukturiertes Konzept zum Atemwegsmanagement unter Berücksichtigung lokaler Gegebenheiten sollte in jeder Notaufnahme etabliert sein und regelmäßig trainiert werden.

Management of anaphylaxis due to COVID-19 vaccines in the elderly

Older adults, especially men and/or those with diabetes, hypertension, and/or obesity, are prone to severe COVID‐19. In some countries, older adults, particularly those residing in nursing homes, have been prioritized to receive COVID‐19 vaccines due to high risk of death. In very rare instances, the COVID‐19 vaccines can induce anaphylaxis, and the management of anaphylaxis in older people should be considered carefully. An ARIA‐EAACI‐EuGMS (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma, European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and European Geriatric Medicine Society) Working Group has proposed some recommendations for older adults receiving the COVID‐19 vaccines. Anaphylaxis to COVID‐19 vaccines is extremely rare (from 1 per 100,000 to 5 per million injections). Symptoms are similar in younger and older adults but they tend to be more severe in the older patients. Adrenaline is the mainstay treatment and should be readily available. A flowchart is proposed to manage anaphylaxis in the older patients.

Intervention in anaphylaxis: the experience of one paediatric centre based on NORA reports

Introduction

Intramuscular adrenaline administration is the primary intervention in anaphylaxis.

Aim

To analyse the data on intervention in children admitted due to anaphylaxis to the tertiary paediatric centre and compare them to the data from the Network for Online-Registration of Anaphylaxis.

Material and methods

A validated structured on-line questionnaire was used to collect data concerning the first and second-line intervention in anaphylaxis. The study was conducted in cooperation with the European Anaphylaxis Registry.

Results

The study group comprised 114 children (76 boys, 66.87%) aged 5 months-17 years with the predominance of moderate-to-severe anaphylaxis (grade III in Ring and Messmer's, and grade IV in Mueller's scale). In 103 (90.4%) children the first line of medical intervention was provided by medical staff. In the first-line intervention 39 (34.8%) children were given adrenaline. Five (4.4%) children were given the second dose of adrenaline and were admitted to the intensive care unit. In the second-line intervention adrenaline was given to 12 (15.6%) children. In one third it was at least the second reaction to the same trigger. Children treated with adrenaline were older (9.3 ±4.8 years), in comparison to those not treated (7.3 ±4.6 years, p = 0.034). Directly after the episode of anaphylaxis the children got the prescription for the adrenaline autoinjector in 35.1%, emergency training in 7.9%, and counselling on the avoidance of the anaphylaxis trigger in 30.7%. Grade III R&M reaction increased 3-fold the odds of AAI prescription (95% CI: 1.08-8.15).

Conclusions

There is a strong need to continue education on proper management of anaphylaxis in children.

Ideal body position for epinephrine autoinjector administration

Background: Epinephrine is the first-line therapy for patients with anaphylaxis, and intramuscular (IM) delivery is shown to be superior to subcutaneous (SC) delivery. There currently is no consensus on the ideal body position for epinephrine autoinjector (EAI) administration. Objective: We designed this study to investigate whether SC tissue depth (SCTD) is affected by body position (e.g., standing, sitting, supine), which can potentially impact delivery of EAI into the IM space. Methods: Volunteer adults (ages ≥ 18 years) from a military medical treatment facility in the United States were recruited to participate in this study. SCTD of the vastus lateralis was measured via ultrasound at standing, sitting, and supine body positions. Subjects' age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to compare average SCTD between body positions, sex, and BMI. Results: An analysis of variance of 51 participants (33 men and 18 women) did not reveal statistically significant difference in SCTD among standing, sitting, and supine body positions. It did show a significantly greater SCTD in women than in men (2.72 ± 1.36 cm versus 1.10 ± 0.38 cm; p < 0.001). There was no significant association observed between BMI and SCTD in this study. Conclusion: Body position did not seem to significantly change the distance between skin and thigh muscle in adults. This would suggest that there might not be an ideal body position for EAI administration. Therefore, in case of anaphylaxis, prompt administration of epinephrine is recommended at any position.

Allergische Reaktionen auf COVID-19-Impfungen – Was HNO-Ärzte wissen sollten – Teil 1: Immunologische Grundlagen von Allergien auf Impfstoffe, Immunmechanismen von allergischen und pseudoallergischen Reaktionen; Teil 2: Charakteristika der mRNA-Impfstoffe BNT162b2- und mRNA-1273 zur Prophylaxe von COVID-19 und assoziierte Immunphänomene; Teil 3: Praktische Aspekte der Prophylaxe, Diagnostik und Therapie von Allergien auf COVID-19-Impfstoffe

Allergic reactions against mRNA COVID-19 vaccine are yet uncommon, but due to the high number of people who get this vaccination anaphylaxis will be seen. This is especially so in people who are sensitized to components of the vaccine. This article focuses on practical aspects of diagnostic possibilities, prevention, recognition and therapy of anaphylactic reactions. High-risk population, who should not get vaccinated; as well as people who need allergy diagnostics before vaccinations are discussed. In opinion of allergy experts patients with atopic allergies or venom allergies do not have a higher risk regarding anaphylaxic reaction due to COVID vaccination.

Mediator-Related Symptoms and Anaphylaxis in Children with Mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is characterized by the pathological accumulation of mast cells (MC) in various organs. In these patients, MC may degranulate and thereby contribute to clinical symptoms, especially when a concomitant allergy is present. However, MC activation can not only be induced by high-affinity receptors for IgE, but also by anaphylatoxins, neuropeptides, IgG immune complexes, complement-components, drugs, products of bacteria or parasites, as well as physical factors such as heat, cold, vibration, stress, sun, or physical effort. Symptoms due to mediators released by activated MC may develop in adults suffering from systemic mastocytosis, but also evolve in children who usually have cutaneous mastocytosis (CM). Clinically, CM is otherwise characterized by typical brown, maculopapular skin lesions or mastocytoma associated with a positive Darier's sign. Pruritus and flushing are common and blistering may also be recorded, especially in diffuse CM (DCM). Pediatric patients with mastocytosis may also have gastrointestinal, respiratory, and neurologic complaints. Although anaphylaxis is not a typical finding, pediatric patients with massive skin involvement and high tryptase levels have a relatively high risk to develop anaphylaxis. This paper reviews MC mediator-related symptoms and anaphylaxis in children with mastocytosis, with special emphasis on risk factors, triggers, and management.

Effects of a 90-min educational intervention for patients with insect venom allergy: a prospective controlled pilot study

Background

Anaphylactic sting reactions need a prompt management. A structured educational intervention for patients with insect sting allergy has not been implemented so far. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of a structured 90-min educational intervention for patients with insect sting allergy.

Methods

Patients with an insect venom allergy were offered to participate in a structured 90-min group education (intervention group (IG)) or to attend a control group (CG). The patients’ subjective self-assurance in using the emergency medication, the willingness to always carry the emergency medication, the mental health status, absolute one-time willingness-to-pay (WTP) for complete cure, a disease knowledge assessment and a simulation test to examine the ability to manage an acute sting reaction were estimated at baseline (t0) and at follow-up (t1) as outcome parameters.

Results

55 patients participated in the IG (n = 25, 52.0% female, mean age 55.9 years) or the CG (n = 30, 56.7% female, mean age 52.0 years). Both arms showed a significant gain in self-assurance in using the emergency medication (IG: 6.1 at t0 vs. 8.6 at t1, p < 0.0001 and CG: 7.1 vs. 8.0, p = 0.0062) and ability to manage an acute sting reaction (IG: 6.7 vs. 11.4, p < 0.0001 and CG: 9.0 vs. 10.5, p = 0.0002) at t1. However, trained participants showed a significantly higher gain in the respective parameters. There were no significant changes regarding the remaining examined outcome parameters.

Conclusions

Patients who are willing to invest 90 min in a patient education intervention benefit significantly by an increased subjective and objective empowerment to manage an acute sting reaction.

[Home infusion therapy for Pompe disease: Recommendations for German-speaking countries]

BACKGROUND

Pompe disease is a lysosomal multisystem disorder with predominant proximal myopathy. Treatment with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is available requiring life-long biweekly infusions of recombinant α-glucosidase. To minimize the burden of ERT patients ask for home infusion therapy.

AIMS AND METHODS

Pompe disease experts from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland discussed in two consensus meetings in 2019 and 2020 requirements for home infusion therapy, adequate execution of treatment, and the legal situation for delegating physicians.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Home infusion therapy is principally feasible for patients with Pompe disease if certain preconditions are fulfilled, but the decision to implement has to be made on an individual basis. The treating physician delegates the execution of ERT ad personam to nursing staff but retains full legal responsibility. Home infusion therapy has to be carried out by specially trained and qualified staff. Infusion-related risks comprise mainly allergic reactions, and adequate medical treatment must be warranted. In German-speaking countries, clear rules for conducting home infusion therapy are needed to reduce psychosocial stress for patients with Pompe disease, and providing legal certainty for delegating physicians.

Management of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Nondextran Iron Products: New Insights Into Predisposing Risk Factors

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to nondextran iron products (NDIPs) are rare, but can manifest with severe signs and symptoms. Predisposing risk factors are not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patients with HSRs to NDIPs, with a special focus on possible risk factors.

METHODS

We analyzed clinical characteristics of patients with HSRs to NDIPs referred to our allergy division between 2007 and 2019 compared with tolerant controls, including the type of the eliciting NDIP, severity and characteristics of the HSR, atopy status, history of allergies and urticaria, laboratory and skin test results, and outcome of reexposure with NDIPs.

RESULTS

We evaluated the data of 59 patients and 21 controls. Sixteen patients and 4 controls received the NDIP iron sucrose and 41 patients and 15 controls received ferric carboxymaltose. In 2 patients and in 2 controls, the culprit NDIP was not known. Twenty-seven patients (46%) experienced an anaphylactic reaction grade I, 15 (25%) a grade II reaction, and 17 (29%) a grade III reaction according to Ring and Messmer. On analyzing the history, we found that 22 patients (37%) and 3 controls (14%) reported previous HSRs to other medications. Interestingly, more than half the patients (n = 35 [59%]) compared with only 7 controls (33%) reported an episode of any type of urticaria in their previous history. Most patients (n = 15 [79%]) tolerated reexposure of an NDIP using a low-reactogenic administration protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

A history of drug hypersensitivity and urticaria represent potential risk factors for HSRs to NDIPs. On the basis of our findings, we propose an algorithm for practical management of patients receiving NDIPs aiming to prevent HSRs.

Studie Allergy to Peanuts imPacting Emotions And Life (APPEAL)

Hintergrund

In Industrieländern sind bis zu 3 % aller Kinder von einer Erdnussallergie betroffen. Allergy to Peanuts imPacting Emotions And Life (APPEAL) ist die erste große Studie, die die Auswirkungen und Belastungen durch eine Erdnussallergie auf Betroffene und Angehörige untersucht.

Material und Methoden

Betroffene mit Erdnussallergie und deren Eltern/Betreuer nahmen entweder an einer Online-Umfrage teil (APPEAL‑1, n = 273) oder gaben detaillierte Interviews (APPEAL‑2, n = 32).

Ergebnisse

Von den Befragten der APPEAL-1-Studie (56 erwachsene Patienten mit Erdnussallergie und 217 Eltern/Betreuer von Personen mit Erdnussallergie) gaben 85 % an, dass die Erdnussallergie ihre täglichen Aktivitäten beeinflusst, 65 % fühlten sich deshalb isoliert. 91 % sorgten sich besonders bei gesellschaftlichen Anlässen vor einer potenziellen Erdnussexposition; 85 % verspürten Hindernisse beim Pflegen sozialer Kontakte. Die häufigsten psychologischen Auswirkungen der Erdnussallergie waren Frustration (89 %), Unsicherheit (86 %) und Stress (88 %). Ein Großteil der Befragten (84 %) beschrieb ein Gefühl der Andersartigkeit. Durch die Erdnussallergie kommt es häufig zu Beeinträchtigungen bei sozialen Aktivitäten, im schulischen Umfeld, im Beruf (bei Eltern und erwachsenen Betroffenen) sowie in Bezug auf emotionales Befinden und Beziehungen. Als wichtigste Bewältigungsstrategien nannten die Teilnehmer eine gute Überwachung von Nahrung und Hygiene, den Austausch mit anderen und eine akribische Planung von Aktivitäten.

Schlussfolgerungen

Dies ist die erste alltagsbezogene Umfrage in Deutschland, die die Auswirkungen und Belastungen einer Erdnussallergie bei betroffenen Kindern, Jugendlichen und deren Eltern/Betreuern sowie bei selbst betroffenen Erwachsenen aufzeigt.

Severe bronchial reaction to provocation with fish and crustaceans

The specific inhalation challenge (SIC), a workplace-related inhalation exposure test, is used to identify allergic asthma when symptoms such as coughing, wheezing, or dyspnea occur at the workplace. Its use is risky. A cook (28 years old) has been complaining of rhinoconjunctivitis and contact urticaria while preparing seafood for 3 years. He continues to work, now wears gloves, no longer tastes fish dishes, and receives anti-obstructive therapy (ICS, LABA). Methacholine (MCH) testing for bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) shows mild BHR (PD_100;sRaw: 0.28 mg MCH), skin and blood tests show type I sensitization to fish and crustacean proteins. In SIC with fried shrimps, rhinoconjunctivitis, coughing and distance wheezing, FEV₁ drop > 20%, sRaw increase to 9.6 kPa*s and angioedema occur. Since routine tests showed only a moderate BHR, the suspicion of an occupational disease was formulated very late in the medical examination process. Only the SIC showed the severity of the cook’s bronchial asthma.

Hypersensitivity reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) - a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to verify the validity of clinical history and oral provocation challenges of patients with NSAID hypersensitivity and to identify safe alternatives. The COX-2 inhibitor etoricoxib, in particular, was studied.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 104 patients with confirmed diagnoses of NSAID hypersensitivity treated at the Department of Dermatology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Germany between 2004 and 2012 were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

The medical history and hypersensitivity symptoms during oral provocation testing (OPT) largely coincided and were mostly mild to moderate. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) was the most frequent trigger both anamnestically (27.9 %) and during OPT (47.8 %). Etoricoxib caused the fewest reactions during OPT (4.2 %). Acetaminophen led to reactions in only 6.7 % of the cases studied although it was named more often in clinical histories (14 %).

CONCLUSIONS

OPT should be the aim whenever possible as most symptoms are mild to moderate. To distinguish between selective and cross-hypersensitivity reactions, ASA should be part of the test protocol. Furthermore, the findings of this study indicate that etoricoxib and acetaminophen are safe treatment alternatives in case of NSAID hypersensitivity. However, these drugs should not be administered without prior OPT in an inpatient setting, as severe symptoms can occur.

[Emergencies in dermatology : From gonorrhea to angioedema]

The spectrum of dermatological emergencies is diverse. Infections, in particular sexually transmitted infections, anaphylactic reactions, and cutaneous drug reactions are common causes for patients to present themselves to the dermatological emergency service. If a sexually transmitted infection is suspected, it is important for the physician to recognize which diseases need immediate treatment to avoid late complications. This requires a reliable diagnosis and knowledge of the appropriate therapy. Cutaneous drug reactions can take many forms. There is a spectrum of reactions that occur immediately after the administration of a medication (which manifest themselves as anaphylaxis), to those that can appear weeks after the initiation of a therapy. These reactions can be harmless and self-limiting, but also be life-threatening. It is essential for physicians in everyday clinical practice to recognize drug intolerances in time and to treat them appropriately.

An Immersive Multi-User Virtual Reality for Emergency Simulation Training: Usability Study

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly used as simulation technology in emergency medicine education and training, in particular for training nontechnical skills. Experimental studies comparing teaching and learning in VR with traditional training media often demonstrate the equivalence or even superiority regarding particular variables of learning or training effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

In the EPICSAVE (Enhanced Paramedic Vocational Training with Serious Games and Virtual Environments) project, a highly immersive room-scaled multi-user 3-dimensional VR simulation environment was developed. In this feasibility study, we wanted to gain initial insights into the training effectiveness and media use factors influencing learning and training in VR.

METHODS

The virtual emergency scenario was anaphylaxis grade III with shock, swelling of the upper and lower respiratory tract, as well as skin symptoms in a 5-year-old girl (virtual patient) visiting an indoor family amusement park with her grandfather (virtual agent). A cross-sectional, one-group pretest and posttest design was used to evaluate the training effectiveness and quality of the training execution. The sample included 18 active emergency physicians.

RESULTS

The 18 participants rated the VR simulation training positive in terms of training effectiveness and quality of the training execution. A strong, significant correlation (r=.53, P=.01) between experiencing presence and assessing training effectiveness was observed. Perceived limitations in usability and a relatively high extraneous cognitive load reduced this positive effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The training within the virtual simulation environment was rated as an effective educational approach. Specific media use factors appear to modulate training effectiveness (ie, improvement through "experience of presence" or reduction through perceived limitations in usability). These factors should be specific targets in the further development of this VR simulation training.

Post mortem tryptase: A review of literature on its use, sampling and interpretation in the investigation of fatal anaphylaxis

Post mortem tryptase is a commonly-used ancillary test in the investigation of possible anaphylactic deaths. Ante mortem tryptase interpretation differs from post mortem interpretation due to differing priorities, biochemical behaviours and capacity for follow-up. Additionally, post mortem tryptase sampling site, method and even cut-off levels are not standardised between facilities. This review of the literature investigates the existing research and recommendations on the use of post mortem tryptase in suspected anaphylactic deaths. Currently, autopsy recommendations suggest early sampling, standardised sampling technique with clamping of and aspiration from the femoral vein, and for the results to be interpreted within the wider autopsy and clinical context. Areas in need of further research include the effects of cytolysis on tryptase levels and studies to stratify differing tryptase levels based on type of death and anaphylactic trigger.