The Complexity of Co-Infections in the Era of COVID-19

Bacterial Superinfections After SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns, Impact on Inflammatory Profiles, Severity Scores, and Clinical Outcomes

Background and Objectives: Secondary bacterial pneumonia can substantially worsen the clinical trajectory of patients hospitalized for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to characterize bacterial superinfections in COVID-19, including pathogen profiles, resistance patterns, inflammatory responses, severity scores, and ICU admission risk. Methods: In a retrospective cohort design, we reviewed 141 patients admitted to a single tertiary-care hospital between February 2021 and December 2024. A total of 58 patients had laboratory-confirmed bacterial superinfection by sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, or blood cultures (superinfection group), whereas 83 had COVID-19 without any documented bacterial pathogens (COVID-only group). We collected detailed microbiological data from sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and blood cultures. Antibiotic sensitivity testing was performed using standard breakpoints for multidrug resistance (MDR). Inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index) and the severity indices Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Confusion, Urea, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure (CURB), and National Early Warning Score (NEWS) were measured at admission. Primary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality. Results: Patients in the superinfection group showed significantly elevated inflammatory markers and severity scores compared to the COVID-only group (mean APACHE II of 17.2 vs. 13.8; p < 0.001). Pathogens most frequently isolated from sputum and BAL included Klebsiella pneumoniae (27.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20.7%). Multidrug-resistant strains were documented in 32.8% of isolates. The superinfection group had higher ICU admissions (37.9% vs. 19.3%; p = 0.01) and more frequent mechanical ventilation (25.9% vs. 9.6%; p = 0.01). Mortality trended higher among superinfected patients (15.5% vs. 7.2%; p = 0.09). A total of 34% of the cohort had prior antibiotic use, which independently predicted MDR (aOR 2.6, p = 0.01). The presence of MDR pathogens such as Klebsiella pneumoniae (OR 2.8), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR 2.5), and Staphylococcus aureus (OR 2.1) significantly increases the risk of ICU admission. Conclusions: Bacterial superinfection exacerbates inflammation and worsens outcomes in COVID-19 patients, such as a higher risk of ICU admission.

Co-Infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) and Human Coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1)

Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and human coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1) are two forms of human coronaviruses known to cause respiratory tract symptoms. A co-infection with both viruses is rare, particularly in the United States.

Case description

An 85-year-old male presented to the Emergency Department with recurrent falls, diarrhoea and cough, and whose viral panel was positive for both SARS-COV-2 and HCoV-HKU1. The patient developed bacterial pneumonia and was treated with antibacterial agents and glucocorticoids. His past medical history of atrial fibrillation required careful monitoring and subsequent discontinuation of remdesivir, a medication known to cause adverse cardiovascular effects in COVID-19 patients. The length of stay was also prolonged due to delirium and deconditioning. Ultimately, the patient required an urgent ablation followed by the placement of a permanent pacemaker, and anticoagulation therapy was initiated before discharge. The patient had a favourable outcome given the rarity of this case.

Discussion

COVID-19 patients co-infected with other human coronaviruses should be monitored for disease progression and superimposed bacterial infections. Providers should be cautious with the use of remdesivir in cases of co-infection and in severely ill COVID-19 patients who have a history of atrial fibrillation.

LEARNING POINTS

This is a rare clinical case of a patient co-infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and human coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1), two forms of coronaviruses; the report presents an epidemiological anomaly and a treatment framework.The importance of close monitoring of bacterial infections in coronavirus co-infections is reinforced.The cautious use of remdesivir in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation in severe or unique COVID-19 disease is recommended.

Rhinovirus infection and co-infection in children with severe acute respiratory infection during the COVID-19 pandemic period

Rhinovirus causes respiratory tract infections in children and is found in co-infections. The objective of this research was to study the clinical profile of rhinovirus infection and co-infection in children with severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) during the COVID-19 pandemic period. We included 606 children ranging in age from 0.1 to 144 months of age from March 2020 to December 2021, hospitalized in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). The samples were collected by secretion from the nasopharynx region. A total of 259 children were tested positive for viral infection, 153 (59.07%) of them had a single rhinovirus infection and, 56 (36.6%) were aged between 60.1 and 144 months. Nine types of co-infections were identified and were found coinfection with three or more viruses (22/104, 21.15%). Observing the seasonality, the number of cases was similar between 2020 (49.53%) and 2021 (51.47%). Patients with a single infection (86.88%) and coinfection (67.30%) were more likely to have coughed. Patients with co-infection required the use of O2 for longer than those with a single rhinovirus infection. Hemogram results obtained from individuals with a single infection had higher levels of urea when compared to patients with co-infection with and other respiratory viruses. Multiple correspondence analyses indicated different clinical symptoms and comorbidities in patients with co-infection compared to those with single infection. The results found that the rhinovirus was much prevalent virus during the pandemic period and was found in co-infection with other virus types, what is important to diagnostic for the correct treatment of patients.

Circulation and Codetections of Influenza Virus, SARS-CoV-2, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Rhinovirus, Adenovirus, Bocavirus, and Other Respiratory Viruses During 2022-2023 Season in Latvia

This retrospective study analysed the routine data obtained by multiplex real-time RT-qPCR methods for respiratory virus detection. A total of 4814 respiratory specimens collected during 1 September 2022-31 August 2023 were included in the study. A total of 38% of the specimens were positive for at least one target, with the incidence maximum (82%) for the small children (age group 0-4 years). The five dominant virus groups were rhinovirus (RV, 12%), influenza virus A (IAV, 7%), adenovirus (AdV, 6%), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV, 5%), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, 5%). The specimens with multi-detections represented 19% of the positives, unevenly distributed (n = 225, 56, 43, 24) among the age groups 0-4, 5-14, 15-64, and 65< years, respectively. The dominant virus groups in multi-positive specimens were RV (53%), AdV (43%), and bocavirus (BoV, 35%)-in mutual pairs as well as all three together-followed by RSV (21%), and IAV (15%). Our study focused on the specimens with codetections and provides an insight into the variety of the respiratory virus interactions in Latvia during the first year since pandemic-related social restriction measures were eased. The observations also emphasise the need to consider the differentiation between rhinoviruses and enteroviruses, especially for the youngest patients in the age group 0-4.

Ten-year retrospective data analysis reveals frequent respiratory co-infections in hospitalized patients in Augsburg

Clinical data on the types of respiratory pathogens which are most frequently engaged in respiratory co-infections of children and adults are lacking. We analyzed 10 years of data on a total of over 15,000 tests for 16 viral and bacterial pathogens detected in clinical samples at the University Hospital of Augsburg, Germany. Co-infection frequencies and their seasonal patterns were examined using a proportional distribution model. Co-infections were detected in 7.3% of samples, with a higher incidence in children and males. The incidence of interbacterial and interviral co-infections was higher than expected, whereas bacterial-viral co-infections were less frequent. H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae, rhinovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) were most frequently involved. Most co-infections occurred in winter, but distinct summer peaks were also observed, which occurred even in children, albeit less pronounced than in adults. Seasonality of respiratory (co-)infections decreased with age. Our results suggest to adjust existing testing strategies during high-incidence periods.

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in COVID-19 patients: insights from the National Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study, conducted using the U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS), examines the outcomes and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) in COVID-19 patients and identifies predictive factors to enhance patient prognosis.

METHODS

We analyzed the 2020 U.S. NIS data involving adult patients (≥18 years) admitted with NVUGIB and categorized them based on the presence of COVID-19. Primary and secondary outcomes, NVUGIB-related procedures, and predictive factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 184,885 adult patients admitted with NVUGIB, 1.6% (2990) had COVID-19. Patients with NVUGIB and COVID-19 showed higher inpatient mortality, acute kidney injury, need for intensive care, and resource utilization metrics. Notably, there was a lower rate of early esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Multivariate logistic regression revealed conditions like peptic ulcer disease, mechanical ventilation, and alcohol abuse as significant positive predictors for NVUGIB in COVID-19 patients, whereas female gender and smoking were negative predictors.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that COVID-19 significantly increases the risk of mortality and complications in NVUGIB patients. The observed decrease in early EGD interventions, potentially contributing to higher mortality rates, calls for a review of treatment strategies. Further multicenter, prospective studies are needed to validate these results and improve patient care strategies.

Use of RT-PCR in conjunction with a respiratory pathogen assay to concurrently determine the prevalence of bacteria and SARS-CoV-2 from the nasopharynx of outpatients

Introduction

COVID-19 has emerged as a highly contagious and debilitating disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and has claimed the lives of over 7.7 million people worldwide. Bacterial co-infections are one of many co-morbidities that have been suggested to impact the outcome of COVID-19 in patients. The goals of this study are to elucidate the presence of bacteria in the nasopharynx of SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients and to describe demographic categories that may be associated with the detection of these organisms during one of the initial waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

To this end, we investigated SARS-CoV-2 and bacterial co-detection from outpatient RT-PCR testing in Texas.

Results

The results indicate that Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae were the most frequently detected bacteria in both SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative patients and that these bacteria were present in these two patient populations at similar proportions. We also detected Staphylococcus aureus in a significantly larger proportion of males relative to females and people under 65 years of age relative to those 65 and over. Finally, we observed that SARS-CoV-2 was more commonly detected in Hispanics compared to non-Hispanics; however, low disclosure rates make volunteer bias a concern when interpreting the effects of demographic variables.

Discussion

This study describes the bacteria present in the nasopharynx of SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients, highlights associations between patient demographics and SARS-CoV-2 as well as bacterial co-detection. In addition, this study highlights RT-PCR based molecular testing as a tool to detect bacteria simultaneously when SARS-CoV-2 tests are performed.

Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities of bio-inspired nanomaterials for wound healing applications

Chronic wounds are ubiquitously inhabited by bacteria, and they remain a challenge as they cause significant discomfort and because their treatment consumes huge clinical resources. To reduce the burden that chronic wounds place upon both patients and health services, a wide variety of approaches have been devised and investigated. Bioinspired nanomaterials have shown great success in wound healing when compared to existing approaches, showing better ability to mimic natural extracellular matrix (ECM) components and thus to promote cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Wound dressings that are based on bioinspired nanomaterials can be engineered to promote anti-inflammatory mechanisms and to inhibit the formation of microbial biofilms. We consider the extensive potential of bioinspired nanomaterials in wound healing, revealing a scope beyond that covered previously.

Severe SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory syncytial virus co-infection in two children

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) affects mainly older adults. Those with comorbidities are at a higher risk of severe disease and even death. The symptomatic infection rate of children is lower, manifestations are milder, and severe forms are scarce. We present here two children with severe COVID-19 and a respiratory syncytial virus, with the goal of emphasizing the possibility of coinfection with a severe course and a different result. The microbiological diagnosis was made using multiplex PCR. This assay not only provided an early and accurate diagnosis but also aided in the implementation of contact precautions. Further research should be done to determine the influence of coinfection on the clinical course and outcome of pediatric patients.

Antifungal Action of Herbal Plants' Glycolic Extracts against Candida Species

Candida spp. cause fungal infection that affects patients' oral health. This study aimed to evaluate the isolated and synergistic antifungal effect of Rosa centifolia L., Curcuma longa L., Rosmarinus officinalis L., and Punica granatum L. glycolic extracts against Candida albicans, Candida dubliniensis, Candida tropicalis, and Candida krusei planktonic and biofilm forms. The plant extracts were chemically characterized and the main compounds were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-DAD) analysis. The minimum inhibitory and minimum fungicidal concentrations of the extracts were determined, and antibiofilm activity was evaluated by MTT assay. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests, and by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests, considering a significance level of 5%. The main compounds identified in each of the extracts were: p-coumaric acid (2153.22 μg/100 mL) in the rosemary extract, gallotannins (4318.31 μg/100 mL) in the pomegranate extract, quercetin derivatives (3316.50 μg/100 mL) in the extract of white roses, and curcumin (135.09 μg/100 mL) in the turmeric extract. The combination of R. centifolia and C. longa glycolic extracts was effective against C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, and C. tropicalis biofilms over different periods (p < 0.05). The combination of R. officinalis and P. granatum glycolic extracts was effective against C. albicans and C. krusei biofilms after 30 min, and against C. tropicalis after 24 h, with all combinations showing an average reduction of 50% in cell viability (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the combined plant extracts have antifungal and antibiofilm action against Candida spp. in different concentrations and times of action.

Disinfection and decontamination in the context of SARS-CoV-2-specific data

Given the high transmissibility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as witnessed early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, concerns arose with the existing methods for virus disinfection and decontamination. The need for SARS-CoV-2-specific data stimulated considerable research in this regard. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 is practically and equally susceptible to approaches for disinfection and decontamination that have been previously found for other human or animal coronaviruses. The latter have included techniques utilizing temperature modulation, pH extremes, irradiation, and chemical treatments. These physicochemical methods are a necessary adjunct to other prevention strategies, given the environmental and patient surface ubiquity of the virus. Classic studies of disinfection have also allowed for extrapolation to the eradication of the virus on human mucosal surfaces by some chemical means. Despite considerable laboratory study, practical field assessments are generally lacking and need to be encouraged to confirm the correlation of interventions with viral eradication and infection prevention. Transparency in the constitution and use of any method or chemical is also essential to furthering practical applications.

Black Fungus and beyond: COVID-19 associated infections

Globally, many hospitalized COVID-19 patients can experience an unexpected acute change in status, prompting rapid and expert clinical assessment. Superimposed infections can be a significant cause of clinical and radiologic deviations in this patient population, further worsening clinical outcome and muddling the differential diagnosis. As thrombotic, inflammatory, and medication-induced complications can also trigger an acute change in COVID-19 patient status, imaging early and often plays a vital role in distinguishing the cause of patient decline and monitoring patient outcome. While the common radiologic findings of COVID-19 infection are now widely reported, little is known about the clinical manifestations and imaging findings of superimposed infection. By discussing case studies of patients who developed bacterial, fungal, parasitic, and viral co-infections and identifying the most frequently reported imaging findings of superimposed infections, physicians will be more familiar with common infectious presentations and initiate a directed workup sooner. Ultimately, any abrupt changes in the expected COVID-19 imaging presentation, such as the presence of new consolidations or cavitation, should prompt further workup to exclude superimposed opportunistic infection.

Corynebacterium striatum-Got Worse by a Pandemic?

The role of Corynebacterium striatum has been demonstrated in different nosocomial infections. An increasing number of publications have demonstrated its virulence in the respiratory tract, especially in the immunosuppressed patient population. The number of these patients has increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, we aimed to investigate the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of this species between 2012 and 2021 at the Clinical Center of the University of Szeged, Hungary. Altogether, 498 positive samples were included from 312 patients during the study period. On the isolates, 4529 antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed. Our data revealed that the prevalence of C. striatum increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, the rise occurred in respiratory, blood culture, and superficial samples. During the study period, the rifampicin resistance significantly increased, but others have also changed dynamically, including linezolid. The species occurred with diverse and changing co-pathogens in the COVID-19 era. However, the increasing rifampicin and linezolid resistance of C. striatum was probably not due to the most commonly isolated co-pathogens. Based on resistance predictions, vancomycin is likely to remain the only effective agent currently in use by 2030.

Mucormycosis, one month after recovery from COVID-19: A case report

Introduction

and importance: There are increasing case reports of mucormycosis in patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Herein, we describe the case of mucormycosis after recovery from Covid-19.

Case presentation

The patient was a 73 years old woman with a history of chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia that referred to the emergency department with clinical presentation of Covid-19. On the third day of admission, the Covid-19 PCR test was negative, but the patient presented headache and pain in her upper jaw. Physical examination showed fever, erythema, and tenderness in the right cheek. Emergency biopsy and culture from sinus by subsection to mucormycosis conducted. and the diagnosis of mucormycosis was confirmed by the positive result of biopsy and culture. Despite anti-fungal treatment with Amphotericin B, patient developed severe diarrhea and became hemodynamically unstable. In the stool analysis, Strongyloides stercoralis was reported. Unfortunately, patient was expired on day thirty-two of this admission.

Clinical discussion

Mucormycosis is a dangerous infection, and its rapid diagnosis is so important. On the other hand, Covid-19 may associated with many nonspecific sign and symptoms. These finding may overlap with other infections.

In patients with prolonged mucormycosis infection, the development of strongyloidiasis should not be neglected. A single dose of ivermectin as strongyloidiasis prophylaxis should be given if the duration of the illness is prolonged.

Conclusion

Clinicians should consider mucormycosis and its complications after Covid-19 treatment in diabetic and immunocompromised patients.

•

COVID-19 may be associated with bacterial or fungal co-infections.

•

Nonspecific sign and symptoms of COVID-19, may overlap with other infections.

•

Mucormycosis may occur following COVID-19, especially in patients with risk factors.

•

We report a case of mucormycosis, one month after recovery from COVID-19 in a patient with poor diabetic control.

Coinfection of fungi with SARS-CoV-2 is a detrimental health risk for COVID-19 patients

Background

Notable fungal coinfections with SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients have been reported worldwide in an alarming way. Mucor spp. and Rhizopus spp. were commonly known as black fungi, whereas Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. were designated as white fungi implicated in those infections. In this review, we focused on the global outbreaks of fungal coinfection with SARS-CoV-2, the role of the human immune system, and a detailed understanding of those fungi to delineate the contribution of such coinfections in deteriorating the health conditions of COVID-19 patients based on current knowledge.

Main body

Impaired CD4 + T cell response due to SARS-CoV-2 infection creates an opportunity for fungi to take over the host cells and, consequently, cause severe fungal coinfections, including candidiasis and candidemia, mucormycosis, invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), and COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). Among them, mucormycosis and CAPA have been reported with a mortality rate of 66% in India and 60% in Colombia. Moreover, IPA has been reported in Belgium, Netherlands, France, and Germany with a morbidity rate of 20.6%, 19.6%, 33.3%, and 26%, respectively. Several antifungal drugs have been applied to combat fungal coinfection in COVID-19 patients, including Voriconazole, Isavuconazole, and Echinocandins.

Conclusion

SARS-CoV-2 deteriorates the immune system so that several fungi could take that opportunity and cause life-threatening health situations. To reduce the mortality and morbidity of fungal coinfections, it needs immunity boosting, proper hygiene and sanitation, and appropriate medication based on the diagnosis.

Mixed invasive fungal infections among COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The healthcare system in India collapsed during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A fungal epidemic was announced amid the pandemic with several cases of COVID-associated mucormycosis and pulmonary aspergillosis being reported. However, there is limited data regarding mixed fungal infections in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, we present a series of ten consecutive COVID-19 patients with mixed invasive fungal infections (MIFIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among COVID-19 patients hospitalized in May 2021 at a tertiary care center in North India, 10 cases of microbiologically confirmed COVID-19-associated mucormycosis-aspergillosis (CAMA) were evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients had diabetes and the majority of them were infected with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (6/10, 60%) either on admission or in the past month while two were each of moderate (20%) and mild (20%) categories of COVID-19; and were treated with steroid and cocktail therapy. The patients were managed with amphotericin-B along with surgical intervention. In total, 70% of all CAMA patients (Rhizopus arrhizus with Aspergillus flavus in seven and Aspergillus fumigatus complex in three patients) survived.

CONCLUSION

The study findings reflected the critical importance of a high index of clinical suspicion and accurate microbiological diagnosis in managing invasive dual molds and better understanding of the risk and progression of MIFIs among COVID-19 patients. Careful scrutiny and identification of MIFIs play a key role in the implementation of effective management strategies.

Mixed invasive molds among COVID-19 patients.. [DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.09.21261555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Purpose

Due to surge in COVID cases during the second wave of the COVID pandemic, the healthcare system collapsed in India with shortage of hospital beds, injudicious use of steroids and other immunomodulators, and poor glycaemic monitoring among a population with pre-existing risk of diabetes. Fungal epidemic was announced amid COVID pandemic with several cases of COVID-associated mucormycosis and aspergillosis being reported. But, there is no data regarding mixed fungal infections in COVID patients.

Materials and Methods

The study presented a series of ten consecutive cases with dual invasive molds in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Among patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of COVID in May 2021 at a tertiary care center in North India, ten microbiologically confirmed dual/mixed COVID-associated mucor-aspergillosis (CAMA) were evaluated.

Results

All patients were diabetics with the majority having severe COVID pneumonia (6/10, 60%) either on admission or in the past one month, whilst two were each of moderate (20%) and mild (20%) categories of COVID. The patients were managed with amphotericin-B along with surgical intervention. In this case series, 70% of all CAMA (Rhizopus arrhizuswithAspergillus flavusin seven andAspergillus fumigatusin three patients) patients survived, connoting the critical importance of a high index of clinical suspicion and accurate microbiological diagnosis for managing invasive molds.

Conclusions

Mixed fungal infections i.e. CAMA during COVID and post-COVID periods may be an emerging disease. This outbreak is seen particularly in such patients with uncontrolled diabetes, on steroids, or cocktail therapy, or living in unhygienic environments.We believe that our findings would help gain a better insight into the risk and progression of invasive fungal mixed infections among COVID patients and thus play a pivotal role in diagnosing, classifying, and implementing an effective management strategy for treating similar cases in the future.

Mixed invasive molds among COVID-19 patients.. [DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.09.21261555]

Purpose

Due to surge in COVID cases during the second wave of the COVID pandemic, the healthcare system collapsed in India with shortage of hospital beds, injudicious use of steroids and other immunomodulators, and poor glycaemic monitoring among a population with pre-existing risk of diabetes. Fungal epidemic was announced amid COVID pandemic with several cases of COVID-associated mucormycosis and aspergillosis being reported. But, there is no data regarding mixed fungal infections in COVID patients.

Materials and Methods

The study presented a series of ten consecutive cases with dual invasive molds in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Among patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of COVID in May 2021 at a tertiary care center in North India, ten microbiologically confirmed dual/mixed COVID-associated mucor-aspergillosis (CAMA) were evaluated.

Results

All patients were diabetics with the majority having severe COVID pneumonia (6/10, 60%) either on admission or in the past one month, whilst two were each of moderate (20%) and mild (20%) categories of COVID. The patients were managed with amphotericin-B along with surgical intervention. In this case series, 70% of all CAMA (Rhizopus arrhizuswithAspergillus flavusin seven andAspergillus fumigatusin three patients) patients survived, connoting the critical importance of a high index of clinical suspicion and accurate microbiological diagnosis for managing invasive molds.

Conclusions

Mixed fungal infections i.e. CAMA during COVID and post-COVID periods may be an emerging disease. This outbreak is seen particularly in such patients with uncontrolled diabetes, on steroids, or cocktail therapy, or living in unhygienic environments.We believe that our findings would help gain a better insight into the risk and progression of invasive fungal mixed infections among COVID patients and thus play a pivotal role in diagnosing, classifying, and implementing an effective management strategy for treating similar cases in the future.