Outpatient dobutamine and dopamine infusions in the management of chronic heart failure: clinical experience in 21 patients

Inotropic Agents: Are We Still in the Middle of Nowhere?

Inotropes are prescribed to enhance myocardial contractility while vasopressors serve to improve vascular tone. Although these medications remain a life-saving therapy in cardiovascular clinical scenarios with hemodynamic impairment, the paucity of evidence on these drugs makes the choice of the most appropriate vasoactive agent challenging. As such, deep knowledge of their pharmacological and hemodynamic effects becomes crucial to optimizing hemodynamic profile while reducing the potential adverse effects. Given this perspective, it is imperative for cardiologists to possess a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms governing these agents and to discern optimal strategies for their application across diverse clinical contexts. Thus, we briefly review these agents' pharmacological and hemodynamic properties and their reasonable clinical applications in cardiovascular settings. Critical interpretation of available data and the opportunities for future investigations are also highlighted.

Recommendations for Management of Noncytotoxic Vesicant Extravasations

To prepare clinicians to treat extravasation of noncytotoxic vesicants with antidotes and thermal compresses, a literature review was performed to identify noncytotoxic vesicants and to create evidence and consensus-based recommendations. The stage of injury and vesicant's mechanism of tissue injury dictate treatment. For a vasopressor extravasation, warm compresses and administration of a vasodilator are recommended. For osmolarity, pH, absorption refractory, and cytotoxic concentration-dependent vesicants, warm compresses and administration of hyaluronidase are recommended. Compared with potentially catastrophic costs of undertreatment, the cost of overtreatment is minimal.

Effects of intravenous home dobutamine in palliative end-stage heart failure on quality of life, heart failure hospitalization, and cost expenditure

Aims

In patients with palliative end‐stage heart failure, interventions that could provide symptomatic relief and prevent hospital admissions are important. Ambulatory continuous intravenous inotropes have been advocated by guidelines for such a purpose. We sought to determine the effect of intravenous dobutamine on symptomatic status, hospital stay, mortality, and cost expenditure.

Methods and results

All consecutive end‐stage heart failure patients not amenable for advanced therapies and discharged with continuous intravenous home dobutamine from a single tertiary centre between April 2011 and January 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Dobutamine (fixed dose) was infused through a single‐lumen central venous catheter with a small pump that was refilled by a nurse on a daily basis. Symptomatic status was longitudinally assessed as the change in New York Heart Association class and patient global assessment scale. Antecedent and incident heart failure hospitalizations were determined in a paired fashion, and cost impact was assessed. A total of 21 patients (age 77 ± 9 years) were followed up for 869 ± 647 days. At first follow‐up (6 ± 1 weeks) after the initiation of dobutamine, patients had a significant improvement in New York Heart Association class (−1.29 ± 0.64; P < 0.001), global assessment scale (<0.001), and N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (6247 vs. 2543 pg/mL; P = 0.033). Incident heart failure hospitalizations assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly reduced (P < 0.001 for all) in comparison with antecedent heart failure hospitalizations over the same time period. Cost expenditure was significantly lower at 3 (P < 0.001), 6 (P = 0.005), and 12 months (P = 0.001) after initiation of dobutamine. Mortality rate at 1 year was 48% with 9/12 (75%) patients dying at home, most often from progressive pump failure.

Conclusions

Continuous intravenous home dobutamine in patients with palliative end‐stage heart failure is feasible and associated with improved symptomatic status, heart failure hospitalizations, and health‐care‐related costs. Nevertheless, results should be interpreted in the context of the small and retrospective design. Larger studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of dobutamine in palliative end‐stage heart failure.

Continuous Intravenous Milrinone Therapy in Pediatric Outpatients

Milrinone is a phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor with both positive inotropic and vasodilator properties. Administered as a continuous infusion, milrinone is indicated for the short-term treatment of patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Despite limited data supporting long-term milrinone therapy in adults with congestive heart failure, children managed as outpatients may benefit from continuous milrinone as a treatment for cardiac dysfunction, as a destination therapy for cardiac transplant, or as palliative therapy for cardiomyopathy. The aim of this article is to review the medical literature and describe a home infusion company's experience with pediatric outpatient milrinone therapy.

The Role of Positive Inotropic Drugs in the Treatment of Older Adults with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Positive inotropic drugs have long been studied for their potential benefits in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Although there has been an extensive amount of research about the clinical effects of these drugs in general, few studies examined their effect in older patients. Therefore, there is little or no evidence to guide the use of positive inotropes in older patients with HFrEF. However, recommendations from national heart failure guidelines may be generalized to older HFrEF patients on an individual basis, taking into consideration the basic geriatric principles of pharmacotherapy: start low and go slow.

Renal Function and Outcomes With Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Inotropes in End-Stage Heart Failure: A Retrospective Single Center Study

Background

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and inotrope therapy serve as a bridge to transplant (BTT) or as destination therapy in patients who are not heart transplant candidates. End-stage heart failure patients often have impaired renal function, and renal outcomes after LVAD therapy versus inotrope therapy have not been evaluated.

Methods

In this study, 169 patients with continuous flow LVAD therapy and 20 patients with continuous intravenous inotrope therapy were analyzed. The two groups were evaluated at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after LVAD or inotrope therapy was started. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), BTT rate, and mortality for 6 months following LVAD or inotrope therapy were studied. Results between the groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square with continuity correction or Fischer’s exact at the significance level of 0.05.

Results

Mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was not statistically different between the two groups, with P = 0.471, 0.429, and 0.847 at baseline, 3 and 6 months, respectively. The incidence of AKI, RRT, and BTT was not statistically different. Mortality was less in the inotrope group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Intravenous inotrope therapy in end-stage heart failure patients is non-inferior for mortality, incidence of AKI, need for RRT, and renal function for 6-month follow-up when compared to LVAD therapy. Further studies are needed to compare the effectiveness of inotropes versus LVAD implantation on renal function and outcomes over a longer time period.

Novel role of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the management of end-stage heart failure

In advanced heart failure (HF), chronic inotropic therapy with intravenous milrinone, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, is used as a bridge to advanced management that includes transplantation, ventricular assist device implantation, or palliation. This is especially true when repeated attempts to wean off inotropic support result in symptomatic hypotension, worsened symptoms, and/or progressive organ dysfunction. Unfortunately, patients in this clinical predicament are considered hemodynamically labile and may escape the benefits of guideline-directed HF therapy. In this scenario, chronic milrinone infusion may be beneficial as a bridge to introduction of evidence based HF therapy. However, this strategy is not well studied, and in general, chronic inotropic infusion is discouraged due to potential cardiotoxicity that accelerates disease progression and proarrhythmic effects that increase sudden death. Alternatively, chronic inotropic support with milrinone infusion is a unique opportunity in advanced HF. This review discusses evidence that long-term intravenous milrinone support may allow introduction of beta blocker (BB) therapy. When used together, milrinone does not attenuate the clinical benefits of BB therapy while BB mitigates cardiotoxic effects of milrinone. In addition, BB therapy decreases the risk of adverse arrhythmias associated with milrinone. We propose that advanced HF patients who are intolerant to BB therapy may benefit from a trial of intravenous milrinone as a bridge to BB initiation. The discussed clinical scenarios demonstrate that concomitant treatment with milrinone infusion and BB therapy does not adversely impact standard HF therapy and may improve left ventricular function and morbidity associated with advanced HF.

Intravenous home inotropic use is safe in pediatric patients awaiting transplantation

BACKGROUND

Intravenous inotropic therapy can be used to support children awaiting heart transplantation. Although use of this therapy is discouraged in adults because of poor outcomes, its use in children, particularly outpatient, has had limited evaluation. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective analysis of an intent to treat protocol was completed on United Network for Organ Sharing status 1A patients discharged on inotropic therapy from 1999 until 2012. Intravenous inotropic therapy was initiated for cardiac symptoms not amenable to oral therapy. Patients who were not status 1A or required >1 inotrope were excluded. Efficacy was analyzed by time to first event: transplantation; readmission until transplantation; improvement leading to inotrope withdrawal; or death. Safety included analysis of infection rates, line malfunctions, temporary hospitalization, neurological events, and arrhythmias. One hundred six patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 10.1±6.4 years, 47% of patients had congenital heart disease, and 80% of these patients had single ventricle physiology. In patients without congenital heart disease, 53% had dilated cardiomyopathy, 91% of patients received milrinone, 85% of patients underwent transplantation, 8% of patients successfully weaned from support as outpatients, whereas 6% died. Fifty percent of patients were readmitted before transplantation or weaning from support, of which 64% required only 1 readmission. The majority of readmissions were for heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient intravenous inotropic therapy can be safely used as a bridge to transplantation in pediatric patients. A minority of patients can discontinue inotropic therapy because of clinical improvement.

Inotropes do not increase mortality in advanced heart failure

Inotrope use is one of the most controversial topics in the management of heart failure. While the heart failure community utilizes them and recognizes the state of inotrope dependency, retrospective analyses and registry data have overwhelmingly suggested high mortality, which is logically to be expected given the advanced disease states of those requiring their use. Currently, there is a relative paucity of randomized control trials due to the ethical dilemma of creating control groups by withholding inotropes from patients who require them. Nonetheless, results of such trials have been mixed. Many were also performed with agents no longer in use, on patients without an indication for inotropes, or at a time before automatic cardio-defibrillators were recommended for primary prevention. Thus, their results may not be generalizable to current clinical practice. In this review, we discuss current indications for inotrope use, specifically dobutamine and milrinone, depicting their mechanisms of action, delineating their patterns of use in clinical practice, defining the state of inotrope dependency, and ultimately examining the literature to ascertain whether evidence is sufficient to support the current view that these agents increase mortality in patients with heart failure. Our conclusion is that the evidence is insufficient to link inotropes and increased mortality in low output heart failure.

Inotropic drugs and neurohormonal antagonists in the treatment of HF in the elderly

Heart failure (HF) is the most common reason for hospital admission among individuals over age 65 years and results in more than 1 million admissions each year. The overall annual death rate for HF is approximately 20%. HF results from decreased contractile function of the heart, and neurohormonal dysregulation plays a major part in the morbidity and mortality of the heart. The purpose of this article is to review recent studies on inotropic drugs and neurohormonal antagonists used in the treatment of patients who have HF, especially the elderly.

Inotropic drugs and neurohormonal antagonists in the treatment of HF in the elderly

HF (HF) is the most common reason for hospital admission among individuals over age 65 years and results in more than 1 million admissions each year. The overall annual death rate for HF is approximately 20%. HF results from decreased contractile function of the heart, and neurohormonal dysregulation plays a major part in the morbidity and mortality of the heart. The purpose of this article is to review recent studies on inotropic drugs and neurohormonal antagonists used in the treatment of patients who have HF, especially the elderly.

Chronic inotropic therapy in end-stage heart failure

BACKGROUND

Interventions in advanced heart failure that provide symptom relief and decrease hospital readmission are important. Chronic intravenous inotropic therapy represents a pharmacologic approach that has been advocated for palliative treatment. However, little is known about associated mortality and cost. Therefore, we sought to describe the impact of chronic infusions on resource use and survival.

METHODS

Data were reviewed for a 17-state Medicare region from 1995 to 2002. We obtained hospital and outpatient expenditures accrued up to 180 days before and after the initiation of chronic infusions. Health care use was defined by dollars reimbursed for drug and hospitalizations per beneficiary. Average accumulated cost curves were generated for dollars reimbursed for drug and for hospitalizations by days at risk.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort (n = 331) was 69.1 +/- 11.3 years. Mortality exceeded 40% at 6 months. Reductions in hospital days were observed at all time points. The amounts reimbursed at 30 and 60 days before and after initiation of inotrope favor drug therapy; however, at six months, the amounts reimbursed were greater due to the cost of milrinone.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic intravenous inotrope use was associated with a high mortality. The cost for milrinone was significant, but there was a decrease in expenditures for subsequent hospitalizations. In the absence of appropriately designed clinical trials, the data suggest that the decision to use inotropes, the choice of inotrope, and the duration of treatment should reflect the impact on resource use.

Outpatient continuous parenteral inotropic therapy as bridge to transplantation in children with advanced heart failure

BACKGROUND

Advanced heart failure in children is associated with high morbidity and mortality and is often refractory to standard medical therapy. The purpose of this study was to review our institutional experience with the use of outpatient parenteral inotropic therapy (PIT) for advanced chronic heart failure in children.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed the medical records of all patients treated with PIT as outpatients. Seven patients received outpatient PIT from 2/99 to 1/05 (mean age was 14.6 years +/- 3.7). Median duration of therapy was 10 weeks (range 4-84 weeks). The mean number of emergency department visits per patient was greater before starting PIT than after starting PIT (2.3 +/- 1.8 versus 1.1 +/- 2.2, P < .05). The mean number of hospital admissions from exacerbation of heart failure symptoms decreased after starting PIT (2.1 +/- 1.3 versus 0.6 +/- 0.8, P < .05). Mean EF% in patients with systolic dysfunction improved while on therapy (30 +/- 14% before versus 39 +/- 16% after, P < .05). There was 1 death and 5 complications in 2 patients. Six patients were successfully bridged to transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient continuous parenteral inotropic therapy may serve as a successful bridge to cardiac transplantation in selected pediatric outpatients.

Calcium sensitizer agents: a new class of inotropic agents in the treatment of decompensated heart failure

The clinician's primary objective in treating a patient with decompensated heart failure is rapid and effective stabilization. This goal often is achieved through the use of inotropic support. Classic inotropic agents (beta-adrenergic agonists and phosphodiesterase III inhibitors) can provide short-term hemodynamic benefits, but their long-term use has been correlated with poor survival rates. Calcium sensitizers comprise a new drug class that offers hemodynamic and symptomatic improvements without increasing cAMP and intracellular calcium concentrations. These agents enhance contractility without a concurrent increase in the risk of cardiac events and thus represent a significant improvement over classic positive inotropic agents. Levosimendan is the most potent calcium sensitizer to date, exhibiting a unique dual mechanism of action that combines a positive inotropic action mediated via calcium sensitization and a vasodilator property via ATP-dependent potassium channels. Available clinical data suggest that calcium sensitizer agents represent a promising class of inotropic agents in a field that has seen few advances in recent decades.

Sympathetic Nerve Activity After Thoracoscopic Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Sympathetic benefits of thoracoscopic cardiac resynchronization therapy (TCRT) in congestive heart failure (CHF) are unknown. We determined cardiac hemodynamics, functional status, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in a group of TCRT patients. We aimed to compare these patients with CHF patients with cardiac asynchrony (ASY) to substantiate the beneficial effects of TCRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eleven patients resynchronized by TCRT 6 +/- 1 months before study inclusion (SYN) and 10 matched ASY patients underwent blood pressure, heart rate, and MSNA recordings. All underwent functional status, cardiac index, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessments. SYN patients had shorter QRS duration and interventricular mechanical delays, longer 6 minute walking distance and lower New York Heart Association class (all P < .05) than ASY patients. MSNA of 56 +/- 2 bursts/min in ASY patients was higher than in SYN patients (48 +/- 3 bursts/min, P < .05). Cardiac index was higher in SYN patients than in ASY patients (2.8 +/- 0.2 versus 1.9 +/- 0.2 L.min.m2, P < .05, respectively). MSNA was highest in the patients with the lowest LVEF (r = -0.49, P < .05), cardiac index (r = -0.48, P < .05) and 6-minute walking distance (r = -0.50, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Lower sympathetic nerve activities in TCRT patients are related to more favorable cardiac indexes and six minute walking distances suggesting a sympathetic, hemodynamic, and functional improvement by TCRT.

Home continuous positive inotropic infusion as a bridge to cardiac transplantation in patients with end-stage heart failure

BACKGROUND

The clinical use of positive inotropic therapy at home in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation has not been reported since United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) regulations were changed to allow home infusions in Status 1B patients.

METHODS

We observed 21 consecutive patients with UNOS 1B status during positive inotropic therapy at home. We used hemodynamic monitoring at the initiation of therapy to optimize dosing. We selected for home therapy patients with stable clinical status and improved functional capacity during inotropic treatment. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators were placed in all but 1 patient before discharge.

RESULTS

Initial positive inotropic therapy included dobutamine in 12 patients (mean dose, 4.5 mcg/kg/min; range, 2.5-7.5 mcg/kg/min), milrinone in 8 patients (mean dose, 0.44 mcg/kg/min; range, 0.375-0.55 mcg/kg/min), and dopamine at a dose of 3 mcg/kg/min in 1 patient. Patients had improved functional capacity (New York Heart Association Class 3.7 +/- 0.1 to 2.4 +/- 0.2, p < 0.01), improved renal function (serum creatinine, 1.5 +/- 0.1 to 1.3 +/- 0.1, p < 0.01), improved resting hemodynamics, and decreased number of hospitalizations during positive inotropic infusion therapy when compared with pre-treatment baseline. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharges were infrequent (0.19 per 100 patient days of follow-up). Actuarial survival to transplantation at 6 and 12 months was 84%.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous positive inotropic therapy at home was safe and was associated with decreased health care costs in selected patients awaiting cardiac transplantation.

Comparative costs of home positive inotropic infusion versus in-hospital care in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation

BACKGROUND

Outpatient positive inotropic support combined with implantation of an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) may be used as a successful bridge to cardiac transplantation in patients with end-stage heart failure. A detailed comparative cost analysis of this outpatient strategy versus in-hospital care has not been previously reported.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-one United Network for Organ Sharing 1B patients awaiting cardiac transplantation received continuous outpatient inotropic therapy for a total of 3070 patient-days. Daily costs for outpatient and in-hospital treatment were calculated. Nonparametric decision analysis was used to determine the strategy with greatest cost savings (immediate hospital discharge after AICD implantation versus in-hospital care). A threshold analysis was performed to test the robustness of the decision analysis model. The outpatient strategy realized an average savings of $71,300 to $120,500 per patient. Decision analysis showed that no fixed period of in-hospital monitoring was more cost-saving than immediate hospital discharge after AICD implantation. Threshold analysis revealed that AICD costs would need to exceed $82,000 (currently $62,000) or that the difference between the outpatient and the in-hospital costs would need to be < or = $475 per day for any other intermediate strategy to be considered cost-saving.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient inotropic therapy combined with AICD implantation in selected patients awaiting cardiac transplantation is an effective cost-minimizing strategy.

Care processes and clinical outcomes of continuous outpatient support with inotropes (COSI) in patients with refractory endstage heart failure

BACKGROUND

This study describes the process and outcomes of continuous outpatient support with inotropes (COSI) in patients with Stage D heart failure (HF). Although Stage D HF has recently been defined as end-stage disease requiring special interventions for survival such as COSI or ventricular assist devices, concern has been raised regarding the safety, efficacy, mortality outcomes, and ethics of COSI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Inotrope dependence was defined as worsening of the patient's clinical status with attempted inotrope withdrawal such that the patient was deemed unlikely to survive to permit hospital discharge. A care process for COSI was designed; baseline and outcome variables were evaluated. COSI was administered to 36 inotrope-dependent patients (age 55.4 +/- 9.5 years, 24 males). Baseline characteristics (mean +/- SD) were consistent with Stage D HF: left ventricular ejection fraction 19.9 +/- 8.5, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) 70 +/- 10 mm, systolic blood pressure 97.4 +/- 13.4 mm Hg, serum creatinine 1.5 +/- 0.6, serum sodium 131.7 +/- 5.3; 69 HF hospitalizations (mean 1.9 +/- 1.8) 6 months before COSI initiation. Symptomatic hypotension, increasing dyspnea, renal dysfunction, and hypoperfusion most commonly prevented inotrope withdrawal. Despite Stage D HF, patients were discharged with COSI ambulatory, oriented, and pain free. Rehospitalizations were 46; 6 subjects accounted for 24 hospitalizations; 23 had 0 or 1 rehospitalization. Median survival was 3.4 months (range 0.2-26.3 months); and 3-, 6-, and 12-month Kaplan Meier survival was 51%, 26%, and 6%, respectively. The majority of patients died at home and chose to not undergo resuscitation attempts.

CONCLUSION

COSI may be an acceptable treatment option for Stage D HF.

The effect of chronic digitalization on pump function in systolic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Short- and intermediate-term use of cardiac glycosides promotes inotropy and improves the ejection fraction in systolic heart failure.

AIM

To determine whether chronic digitalization alters left ventricular function and performance.

METHODS

Eighty patients with mild-to-moderate systolic heart failure (baseline ejection fraction < or =45%) participated from our institution in a multi-center, chronic, randomized, double-blind study of digitalis vs. placebo. Of the 40 survivors, 38 (20 allocated to the digitalis arm and 18 to the placebo arm) were evaluated at the end of follow-up (mean, 48.4 months). Left ventricular systolic function was assessed by both nuclear ventriculography and echocardiography. The ejection fraction was measured scintigraphically, while the ventricular volumes were computed echocardiographically.

RESULTS

The groups did not differ, at baseline or end-of-study, with respect to the ejection fraction and the loading conditions (arterial pressure, ventricular volumes and heart rate) by either intention-to-treat or actual-treatment-received analysis. Over the course of the trial, the digitalis arm exhibited no significant increase in the use of diuretics (18%, P=0.33), in distinction from the placebo group (78%, P=0.004), and a longer stay on study drug among those patients who withdrew from double-blind treatment (28.6 vs. 11.4 months, P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Following chronic use of digitalis for mild-to-moderate heart failure, cross-sectional comparison with a control group from the same inception cohort showed no appreciable difference in systolic function or performance. Thus, the suggested clinical benefit cannot be explained by an inotropic effect.

Chronic infusion of dobutamine and nitroprusside in patients with end-stage heart failure awaiting heart transplantation: safety and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

in patients with severe heart failure additional therapeutic support with intravenous inotropic or vasodilator drugs is frequently employed in an attempt to obtain hemodynamic and clinical control. No data comparing the use and efficacy of chronic intravenous inotropic and vasodilator therapy in patients with advanced heart failure are available.

AIMS

we evaluated, in a group of patients with advanced heart failure undergoing chronic infusion with dobutamine or nitroprusside, in addition to optimized oral therapy, (1) the safety of chronic infusion, (2) the efficacy of both drugs in managing unloading therapy and (3) clinical outcome of the two therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

one hundred and thirteen patients receiving optimized oral therapy, in functional class III/IV with symptoms and signs of refractory heart failure and requiring additional pharmacological support with either intravenous dobutamine or nitroprusside were evaluated. Clinical and therapeutic management and clinical outcome of the two groups were considered.

RESULTS

dobutamine was administered for 12 h/day for 20+/-23 days at a dosage of 7+/-3 microg/kg/min to 43 patients. The mean dose of nitroprusside was 0.76+/-0.99 microg/kg/min. The mean duration of use of this drug, administered as a 12-h/day infusion was 22+/-38 days. Nitroprusside infusion allowed greater doses of short-term ACE-inhibitors to be used compared to pre-infusion (ACE-inhibitor dose: 55+/-30 mg/day vs. 127+/-30 mg/day P<0.0001) and during dobutamine infusion (ACE-inhibitor dose: 85+/-47 mg/day vs. 127+/-30 mg/day P<0.002). Nitroprusside unlike dobutamine significantly improved the NYHA functional class. Of the 113 patients, 109 (97%) had a cardiac event during a mean follow-up of 337+/-264 days. Forty-four patients required hospitalization for worsening congestive heart failure, 45/113 (39%) patients died during the follow-up and 27/113 (24%) patients had a heart transplant in status one. Hospitalization, because of worsening heart failure was less frequent in the nitroprusside than in the dobutamine subgroup [29/51 (57%) vs. 19/22 (86%) P<0.02]. The overall mortality was 28% (20/70) in the nitroprusside group and 58% (25/43) in the dobutamine group (odds ratio 0.33 CI 0.16 to 0.73 P<0.006). In the group treated with nitroprusside, heart transplantation in status one was performed in 16/33 patients (48%), while in the dobutamine group this was done in 11/14 patients (78%) (odds ratio 0.25 CI 0.06-1.02 P<0.06). There was a significant reduction in the combined end-point of mortality/heart transplantation in status one in patients treated with nitroprusside compared to those treated with dobutamine (36/70 (51%) vs. 36/43 (84%) - (odds ratio 0.34 CI 0.14-0.80 P<0.01). The incidence of adverse events in the patients treated with nitroprusside was similar to that in those treated with dobutamine (20% vs. 17% P=ns).

CONCLUSIONS

for patients awaiting heart transplantation chronic intermittent nitroprusside infusions are more effective and safer than dobutamine in relieving symptoms, facilitating unloading therapy management and improving survival. Whether chronic intermittent infusion of nitroprusside could represent a feasible medical strategy in out-patients with severe heart failure remains to be investigated.

Long-term intermittent dobutamine infusion combined with oral amiodarone improves the survival of patients with severe congestive heart failure

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of long-term intermittent dobutamine infusion (IDI) with concomitant administration of low-dose amiodarone in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) refractory to standard medical treatment.

DESIGN

Prospective, interventional clinical trial.

SETTING

Inpatient and outpatient heart failure clinic in a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Twenty-two patients with CHF refractory to standard treatment who could be weaned from dobutamine therapy after an initial 72-h infusion were included in this study. The first 11 patients (group 1) were treated with IDI, 10 micromin, as needed (mean, once every 16 days, lasting for 12 to 48 h); the next 11 patients (group 2) received oral amiodarone, 400 mg/d, and IDI, 10 microg/kg/min, for 8 h every 7 days.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

There were no differences in baseline clinical, hemodynamic, and five biochemical characteristics between the two groups. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 13.5 +/- 4.5% in group 1 vs 15.5 +/- 4.9% in group 2 (mean +/- SD; p = 0.451); mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 31.3 +/- 4.4 mm Hg vs 29.4 +/- 3.3 mm Hg (p = 0.316); serum creatinine was 1.9 +/- 0.4 mg/dL vs 1.6 +/- 0.5 mg/dL (p = 0.19); and serum Na was 139.6 +/- 6.2 mEq/L vs 138.4 +/- 3.1 mEq/L (p = 0.569). At 12 months of follow-up, 1 of 11 patients (9%) was alive in group 1 vs 6 of 11 patients (55%) in group 2 (p = 0.011). Furthermore, in group 2, the functional status improved significantly within the first 3 months of treatment, from New York Heart Association functional class IV to 2.63 +/- 0.5 (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Long-term IDI in conjunction with amiodarone, added to conventional drugs, improved clinical status and survival of patients with severe CHF.

Outpatient parenteral inotropic therapy for advanced heart failure

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced heart failure generally have hemodynamic perturbation characterized by low cardiac output and high ventricular filling pressures. This creates a clinical milieu with profound symptomatology that includes weakness, fatigue, and fluid-retention states causing peripheral edema, mesenteric congestion, and dyspnea syndromes. Great morbidity including hospital admissions and readmissions as well as high mortality rates ensue. Though medication and/or surgical intervention often attenuate heart failure symptomatology, morbidity, and mortality, some patients reach more advanced stages despite aggressive maneuvers. Indeed, patients presenting with acute decompensation of chronic congestive heart failure frequently receive parenteral inotropic drugs during their hospitalization with clinical improvement. Because these agents generally increase cardiac output and reduce pre-load and afterload, they can be lifesaving. Some patients, however, have symptomatic and hemodynamic rebound to worsened heart failure states during or shortly after inotrope weaning.

METHODS

It was, then, a logical step to segue from acute inpatient inotrope infusion to long-term administration of these drugs in the outpatient setting when patients were dependent on these agents. Dopamine, dobutamine, and milrinone are all generally available inotropes that have been used singly or in combination in a chronic outpatient infusion setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from a few small clinical trials and anecdotal case experience suggest that these drugs result in both hemodynamic and clinical improvement that is generally sustained during chronic administration, and even noted long after discontinuation of infusions in some patients. Some reports have suggested that intermittent infusion therapy in outpatients (so-called pulsed therapy) is effective in attenuating congestive heart failure symptoms long term, with more data supporting chronic infusion of these agents. Though questions regarding safety of these agents have been raised, a reasonable compendium of data published to date supports the contention that inotropic drugs used in this fashion ameliorate symptoms. Legitimate concern may be raised regarding exacerbation of arrhythmias with subsequent sudden cardiac death syndrome; however, in severely symptomatic heart failure patients, the trade-off between symptomatic amelioration and the chance of sudden cardiac death may be worthwhile. Unfortunately, precise guidance regarding the best drug, dose, optimal administration technique, weaning protocol, and actual risk/benefit ratio are not well characterized. Practice as been guided, in large part, by anecdotal experience. However, it appears that chronic or pulsed outpatient parenteral inotropic infusion therapy is frequently prescribed and that this treatment option is an effective alternative for carefully selected patients with severely symptomatic and advanced heart failure. Formulating optimal protocols for home inotropic drug infusion therapy by conducting properly designed clinical trials will be an essential endeavor.

Advances in the treatment of congestive heart failure: new approaches for an old disease

Heart failure is a symptom complex of varied etiology associated with substantial mortality. Approximately 5 million Americans have the disease, with 400,000 new cases diagnosed each year. Despite better understanding of its pathophysiology, therapeutic options remain suboptimal and the syndrome remains associated with high rates of hospitalization and loss of economic productivity. Management traditionally included vasodilators, diuretics, and digoxin, with a focus on controlling symptoms and improving ejection fraction and exercise capacity. Drug therapy now is focused on improving survival, with a reduction in health care costs related to hospitalizations. Drugs with a proven benefit in reducing morbidity and mortality are angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, and the combination of hydralazine plus a nitrate. Diuretics, digoxin, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, catecholamine infusions, amiodarone, left ventricular assist devices, and transplantation are also options.

Intermittent positive inotrope infusion in the management of end-stage, low-output heart failure

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of the parenteral positive inotropes (dobutamine and milrinone) for short-term treatment of patients with acute, decompensated heart failure (HF). Despite the limited approved indication, parenteral, positive inotropes have been used clinically for long-term therapy to support the circulation as a bridge to transplant among patients waiting for an organ donor. The increasing number of patients with HF who are ineligible for transplant and the inadequate supply of donor organs have generated interest in the use of intermittent, parenteral positive inotropes for palliative therapy in patients with end-stage HF. Efforts by some clinicians to provide optimal symptomatic relief while controlling health care costs have produced a number of HF clinics that provide intermittent, parenteral inotropic therapy as a component of HF therapy. This article reviews the evidence for and against intermittent infusion of these agents in the ongoing care of people with end-stage HF who are not candidates for transplant. The available evidence indicates that intermittent positive inotropic infusion is associated with fewer HF symptoms, increased functional status, reduced health care costs, but also with increased mortality.

Intermittent 6-month low-dose dobutamine infusion in severe heart failure: DICE multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage heart failure are often refractory to maximal oral therapy, and they have high mortality rates, poor quality of life, and frequent hospitalizations with elevated health care costs. Intermittent dobutamine therapy has been suggested as an additional option in this clinical setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients clinically stable for at least 48 hours with standard treatment, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV, cardiac index </=2.2 L/min/m(2), and left ventricular ejection fraction </=30% were randomly assigned to ambulatory intermittent dobutamine or optimal standard treatment. Dobutamine was infused at 2.5 microgram/kg/min with a portable pump 48 hours/week for 6 months. The primary study end point was the reduction of hospitalizations for worsening of congestive heart failure (CHF); changes in NYHA functional class, 6-minute walking test, and mortality rates were secondary end points. During the 6-month follow-up, all patients in dobutamine and control groups underwent weekly clinical visits with serum sodium and potassium measurement. Baseline characteristics were age 65 +/- 2 years, NYHA class III/IV 17/21, ejection fraction 22% +/- 1%, and cardiac index 1.89 +/- 0.1 L/min/m(2), without differences between treatment groups. Hospitalizations for all causes over a 6-month period were 17 and 11 in control and dobutamine groups; 11 of 17 and 7 of 11 were for worsening CHF. Four control patients but none in the dobutamine group had 2 or more hospitalizations for worsening of CHF. There were no significant differences in NYHA functional class and in 6-minute walking test. Three patients in the control group died and 5 in the dobutamine group died. Two patients in the dobutamine group underwent heart transplantation. Protocol was discontinued in the dobutamine group for severe ventricular arrhythmias (1 patient), infusion system failure (1 patient), and consent withdrawal (1 patient). In 3 patients in the dobutamine group, drug dose was increased to 5 microgram/kg/min because of CHF.

CONCLUSIONS

Six-month intermittent low-dose dobutamine administration was well tolerated by patients with severe CHF; it did not improve the functional status and did not significantly increase the mortality rate as found with higher dobutamine doses in other studies. Hospitalizations for all causes and for worsening of CHF tended to be fewer in the dobutamine group.

Torsade de pointes ventricular tachycardia during low dose intermittent dobutamine treatment in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure

The authors describe the case of a 56-year-old woman with chronic, severe heart failure secondary to dilated cardiomyopathy and absence of significant ventricular arrhythmias who developed QT prolongation and torsade de pointes ventricular tachycardia during one cycle of intermittent low dose (2.5 mcg/kg per min) dobutamine. This report of torsade de pointes ventricular tachycardia during intermittent dobutamine supports the hypothesis that unpredictable fatal arrhythmias may occur even with low doses and in patients with no history of significant rhythm disturbances. The mechanisms of proarrhythmic effects of Dubutamine are discussed.

Current Concepts in the Management of Heart Failure

Objective:

To give an overview of the epidemiology, etiology, and symptoms and signs of heart failure (HF), and the role of various therapeutic modalities that influence functional status, morbidity, and mortality in HF.

Data Sources:

Computerized search of the MEDLINE database (1976–1998) and review chapters from medical textbooks.

Data Extraction:

Clinical trials evaluating the effect of drugs on morbidity and mortality of patients with HF.

Data Synthesis:

HF is a clinical syndrome with high prevalence and mortality. The treatment approach varies depending on the etiology and type of HF. Several large-scale clinical trials with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors demonstrate improved survival and reduced hospitalization in patients with all degrees of HF. Several other trials report similar benefits in postmyocardial infarction patients with HF. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocking agents have also been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with HF and may be used in patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors. Therapy with hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate also improves exercise tolerance as well as survival in patients with HF. The combination of these agents with ACE inhibitors may be useful in patients who remain symptomatic while taking ACE inhibitors. Such second-generation dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers as amlodipine have also been shown to improve symptoms, exercise tolerance, and survival in nonischemic patients. Diuretics are effective in reducing the symptoms of HF resulting from fluid overload. Inotropic drugs such as digoxin may improve symptoms and reduce hospitalization for patients with HF but do not reduce overall mortality. Long-term, continuous use of inotropic agents, such as amrinone, milrinone, dobutamine, and high-dose vesnarinone, may improve quality of life but increase mortality in HF. Beta-blockers, particularly Carvedilol, with vasodilating properties demonstrate positive survival results in patients with mild-to-moderate HF.

Conclusions:

ACE inhibitors are the initial drug of choice in the treatment of HF; however, angiotensin II receptor antagonists may be used in patients who are intolerant to ACE inhibitors. Diuretics are useful mainly to control the fluid overload in HF. Digoxin is helpful in patients with atrial fibrillation and rapid ventricular response and in patients who are resistant to ACE inhibitors and diuretics. Hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate therapy is valuable in patients whose symptoms cannot be controlled with optimal doses of diuretics, digoxin, and ACE inhibitors. Careful use of newer beta-blockers, with optimal titration of diuretics, in mild-to-moderate HF may help prolong life. Newer dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers may be beneficial in nonischemic patients with HF.

Parenteral inotropic support for advanced congestive heart failure

Parenterally administered positive inotropic agents remain an important component of the therapeutics of cardiac dysfunction and failure. Dobutamine, a catechol, remains the prototype of this drug group, but recently has been joined by the phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, milrinone. Compared with dobutamine, milrinone has greater vasodilating-unloading properties. The catecholamine, dopamine, is often used as a parenteral positive inotrope; but at moderate to high dose, it evokes considerable systemic vasoconstriction. At lower doses, dopamine appears to augment renal function. Levosimendan and toborinone, new compounds with several mechanisms of action, are under active clinical investigation and review for approval. Parenteral positive inotropic therapy is indicated for short-term (hours to days) treatment of cardiovascular decompensation secondary to ventricular systolic dysfunction, low-output heart failure. More prolonged or continuous infusion of one of these agents may be necessary as a "pharmacologic bridge" to cardiac transplantation, another definitive intervention, or more advanced, intense medical therapy. An occasional patient will require a continuous infusion via indwelling venous catheter and portable pump, simply to be able to be discharged from the hospital setting and function in the home environment. Intermittent parenteral inotropic therapy for chronic heart failure has provoked considerable controversy and passion among cardiologists and heart failure specialists; an attempt is made to present this topic in an objective manner.

Beneficial effects of intermittent home administration of the inotrope/vasodilator milrinone in patients with end-stage congestive heart failure: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

End-stage congestive heart failure (CHF) is associated with a high mortality rate and is often refractory to standard medical treatment. Although parenteral inotropes have been beneficial in hospitalized patients, their use in outpatients has been limited by toxicity and tachyphylaxis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To determine whether patients with end-stage CHF could safely tolerate intermittent outpatient inotropic therapy and demonstrate both symptomatic and functional improvement with these agents, we studied the effects of low-dose, intermittent home infusions of the inotrope/vasodilator milrinone in 10 patients with end-stage CHF. After showing hemodynamic improvement with milrinone while hospitalized, central lines were placed and patients were given the drug at home with small portable infusion pumps, starting at 3 days a week for 6 hours at a time over a 3-month period. Patients tolerated the drug well, with no deaths and a fourfold decrease in hospitalizations during the study. Arrhythmias were minimal and angina decreased in two patients. Mean total, physical, and emotional scores on the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire reflected a general trend of symptomatic improvement throughout the infusion period. The mean number of reported hours of improvement after infusion progressively increased throughout the study, producing a mean of 25 hours of postinfusion improvement during the final week (p < 0.01). Repeat hemodynamic study at the end of the 3-month period showed trends toward improvement in cardiac function.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate safety, efficacy, hemodynamic, and functional improvement in patients receiving low-dose, intermittent outpatient milrinone therapy. We believe this improvement partly relates to a "training" effect on the heart or peripheral muscles and circulation. These promising results suggest that given appropriately, inotropes have an important therapeutic role in the outpatient treatment of end-stage CHF.

Dobutamine and nitroprusside infusion in patients with severe congestive heart failure: hemodynamic improvement by discordant effects on mitral regurgitation, left atrial function, and ventricular function

OBJECTIVES

In patients with severe heart failure additional therapeutic support with intravenous inotropic or vasodilator drugs is frequently used in the attempt to obtain hemodynamic control. The nature and extent to which diastolic filling, atrial function, and mitral regurgitation are modified by these drugs have not been fully explored. The aim of this study was to compare the acute adaptations of the left ventricular performance, left atrial function, and mitral regurgitation that accompanied hemodynamic improvement during intravenous dobutamine and nitroprusside infusions in patients with severe chronic heart failure.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients with severe heart failure were evaluated by simultaneous echo-Doppler and hemodynamic investigations at baseline and during nitroprusside and dobutamine administration. Mitral flow velocity variables, left atrial and ventricular volumes, left atrial reservoir, conduit and pump volumes, and mitral regurgitation jet area were compared by analysis of variance for repeated measurements.

RESULTS

Nitroprusside increased cardiac output (2.1 +/- .5 vs 2.6 +/- .5 L/min/m2, p < 0.004), reduced left ventricular filling pressure (25 +/- 6 vs 14 +/- 4 mm Hg, p < 0.0001), and improved left atrial pump volume (19 +/- 3 vs 26 +/- 12 ml, p < 0.02) without variations in left atrial reservoir and conduit volume. The restoration of preload reserve and improvement of the atrial contribution to left ventricular diastolic filling were demonstrated by the Doppler mitral flow pattern, which moved from a restrictive to a normal pattern. Furthermore mitral regurgitation decreased in all patients (9 +/- 4.6 vs 4.6 +/- 3.4 cm2, p < 0.0001). Dobutamine increased cardiac output (2.1 +/- .5 vs 2.8 +/- .6 L/min/m2), but the effects on pulmonary wedge pressure and mitral regurgitation were variable and unpredictable. Left atrial reservoir and conduit volumes increased, whereas left atrial pump volume did not change (19 +/- 13 vs 22 +/- 14 ml, p = NS). Furthermore Doppler mitral flow showed a persistent restrictive pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced congestive heart failure both nitroprusside and dobutamine improve cardiac output, with different adaptations of left ventricular performance and left atrial function. Nitroprusside seems to restore both atrial and ventricular pump function better. Careful echo-Doppler monitoring during drug infusion provides information relevant to the clinical treatment of individual patients.

Home inotropic therapy in advanced heart failure: cost analysis and clinical outcomes

STUDY OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to assess cost savings and clinical outcomes associated with the use of home i.v. inotropic therapy in patients with advanced (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class IV) heart failure.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Tertiary care referral center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Twenty-four patients (13 men, 11 women; age, 61+/-12 years) with left ventricular ejection fraction <30% and heart failure refractory to oral agents required home i.v. inotropic therapy for at least 4 consecutive weeks between May 1994 and April 1996. Inotropic agents used included dobutamine (n=20; dose, 5.0+/-2.2 microg/kg/min) or milrinone (n=7; dose, 0.53+/-0.05 microg/kg/min).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Cost of care and clinical outcomes (hospital admissions, length of hospital stay, NYHA functional class) were compared during the period of inotropic therapy (study period) and the immediate preceding period of equal duration (control period). In comparison to the control period, the study period (3.9+/-2.7 months) was associated with a 16% reduction in cost, amounting to a calculated savings of $5,700 per patient or $1,465 per patient per month. Concomitantly, a decrease in the number of hospital admissions from 2.7+/-2.6 to 1.3+/-1.3 (p=0.056) and length of hospital stay from 20.9+/-12.7 to 5.5+/-5.4 days (p=0.0004) was observed with improvement in NYHA functional class from 4.0+/-0.0 to 2.7+/-0.9 (p<0.0001). Eight patients (38%) died after 2.8+/-1.7 months of home i.v. inotropic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Home i.v. inotropic therapy reduces hospital admissions, length of stay, and cost of care and improves functional class in patients with advanced (NYHA class IV) heart failure.

Continuous home ambulatory intravenous inotropic drug therapy in severe heart failure: safety and cost efficacy

Some patients with dilated cardiomyopathy who are inotrope dependent but remain well by undergoing infusions can be managed by ambulatory infusions at home. We report our results in 20 patients awaiting heart transplantation, unable to be weaned from intravenous inotropic therapy on 2 or more occasions, but who were well while receiving inotropes and received home ambulatory infusions. The patients were treated with ACE inhibitors, digoxin, diuretics, vasodilators, close electrolyte management, and low-dose amiodarone for those with more than four-beat ventricular tachycardia. Infusions were delivered by a tunneled subclavian catheter and syringe driver. Thirteen patients received dopamine, four received dobutamine, and three received both. Mean duration of inotropic therapy was 5 months with 70% of the time spent as an outpatient. Eleven patients received transplants, two remain on the waiting list, and seven died after being removed from the list because of general deterioration or renal dysfunction. There were no sudden deaths. Actuarial survival was 71% at 3 months, which is not less than that expected for an inotrope-dependent population. All patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy survived to transplantation. In contrast, all three with right heart failure caused by pulmonary vascular disease and four of seven with ischemic cardiomyopathy died. Inpatient days were reduced by 70%, leading to considerable cost savings. Home ambulatory inotropic therapy is safe, cost-effective, best suited to those with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and dramatically reduces inpatient hospital duration.

Intermittent dobutamine therapy in patients with advanced congestive heart failure

Congestive heart failure is an increasingly common condition carrying a poor prognosis and a decay in the quality of life. Usually frequent and lengthy hospitalizations are required with heart failure, with obvious discomfort for the patient and increase in health costs. Heart transplantation is rarely possible due to shortage of donors. Thus, improvement of pharmacological strategies for the management of these patients is desirable. The present study evaluated the effects of intermittent dobutamine infusion in elderly patients (mean age 75.9 years), hospitalized for advanced (NYHA, 1973, class IV) congestive heart failure of ischemic etiology. Dobutamine infusions of 2, 4 and 6 microg/kg/min for 36 h every 2-4 weeks were randomly prescribed to 24 subjects, who were then followed up every three months for an average of ten months. Data on mortality, cardiovascular events and NYHA (1973) functional classifications were systematically collected. Our study shows that while in this series of patients mortality remained high (50% at 12 months), there was an improvement in the NYHA-classification during the follow-up, and a decrease in the need for hospitalization. In addition, side effects were relatively rare, with only two patients interrupting dobutamine treatment. We conclude that intermittent dobutamine infusion is a reasonable treatment option in elderly patients with congestive heart failure unresponsive to conventional treatments.

Refractory Heart Failure: A Therapeutic Approach

Optimal “triple therapy” for patients with chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) includes diuretics, digoxin, and either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or hydralazine plus nitrates. Refractory CHF is defined as symptoms of CHF at rest or repeated exacerbations of CHF despite “optimal” triple-drug therapy. Most patients with refractory CHF require hemodynamic monitoring and treatment in the intensive care unit. If easily reversible causes of refractory CHF cannot be identified, then more aggressive medical and surgical interventions are necessary. The primary goal of intervention is to improve hemodynamics to palliate CHF symptoms and signs (i.e., dyspnea, fatigue, edema). Secondary goals include improved vital organ and tissue perfusion, discharge from the intensive care unit, and, in appropriate patients, bridge to cardiac transplantation. Medical interventions include inotropic resuscitation (e.g., adrenergic agents, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, allied nonglycoside inodilators), load resuscitation (e.g., afterload and preload reduction with nitroprusside or nitroglycerin; preload reduction with diuretics and diuretic facilitators, such as dopaminergic agents or ultrafiltration), and electrical resuscitation (e.g., prevention of sudden death, correction of new or rapid atrial fibrillation, or dual chamber pacing in the setting of relative prolongation of the PR interval and diastolic mitral/tricuspid regurgitation). Surgical interventions are temporizing (e.g., intra-aortic balloon pump and other mechanical assist devices) or definitive (e.g., coronary artery revascularization, valvular surgery, and cardiac transplantation). Although these interventions may improve immediate survival in the short term, only coronary artery revascularization and cardiac transplantation have been shown to improve long-term survival.

Safety and efficacy of epoprostenol in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Epoprostenol Multicenter Research Group

Patients with advanced heart failure often remain severely symptomatic and have a high mortality rate despite currently available therapy. We studied the safety and efficacy of a new approach to the patient with refractory heart failure: continuous intravenous treatment via a portable infusion pump with epoprostenol (prostacyclin), a potent pulmonary and systemic vasodilator. A group of 33 patients with severe heart failure (64% New York Heart Association class IV and 36% class III) and profound ventricular dysfunction (median left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.15)--despite prior treatment with diuretics (100%), digitalis (91%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (85%), and dobutamine (30%)--underwent a baseline 6-minute walk test prior to dose titration with epoprostenol during invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Subjects responding during the dose titration were randomized, on an open basis, to receive either continuous epoprostenol infusion via an indwelling central venous catheter plus conventional therapy or conventional therapy alone for 12 weeks. The initial dose-ranging study with epoprostenol produced a significant decline in systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance and a substantial increase in cardiac index despite a fall in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Symptoms related to vasodilation were noted within the first week after randomization to epoprostenol in 9 of 16 patients but resolved with adjustment of the infusion and concomitant medications in all but one subject. Dose adjustments during the chronic epoprostenol infusion were infrequent after the first week and complications related to the drug delivery system were rare. The change in distance walked from baseline to the last available 6-minute walk test was significantly greater in patients who received epoprostenol compared with patients assigned to standard therapy (72 +/- 40 vs -39 +/- 32 m, mean +/- SEM; p = 0.033). Our study suggests that long-term intravenous infusion of epoprostenol is feasible in patients with severe heart failure and our hemodynamic and functional results suggest clinical benefit as well. However, until recent results indicating an adverse effect of epoprostenol on survival are fully evaluated, the role of this drug in the treatment of advanced heart failure will remain uncertain.

Congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema for the emergency physician

Congestive heart failure (CHF) and pulmonary edema are major health problems in the United States as well as across the rest of the developing world. The prevalence of CHF and pulmonary edema in the general population results in a significant number of these patients presenting to Emergency Departments (EDs). Mortality from these disorders is substantial, with a 5-year mortality rate for patients requiring hospitalization of approximately 50%. Understanding of the clinical syndromes of CHF and pulmonary edema requires review of the basic determinants of cardiovascular performance. Preload, afterload, contractility, and heart rate may all be modified by pharmacological or mechanical techniques. Diuretics, vasodilators, cardiac glycosides, and other inotropes all may play a role in the ED management of CHF. In rare instances, mechanical devices for support of the heart and circulation may be indicated.

Treatment of end stage dilated cardiomyopathy

Patients should be referred for cardiac transplantation only after all other means of management of congestive heart failure have been attempted and have been unsuccessful (table 3). An adequate therapeutic trial of conventional and experimental agents including beta blockade and vesnarinone should be completed and be shown to be unsuccessful before transplantation is considered in patients in NYHA class III. Prospective clinical trials need to be completed to define the role of newer therapeutic options. The scarcity of donor organs will probably preclude the use of cardiac transplantation in all patients who may benefit. Alternative methods of cardiac replacement (such as dynamic cardiomyoplasty, permanent implantable mechanical circulatory assistance, and xenografting) must be developed. These methods coupled with better pharmacological treatment will greatly improve the outcome of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

The acute effects of a single dopamine infusion in elderly patients with congestive cardiac failure

1. Dopamine (DA) at low doses (2.5 micrograms kg-1 min-1) produces a measurable increase in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) in young healthy subjects and has a therapeutic effect in younger patients with congestive cardiac failure (CCF). In elderly healthy subjects, DA increases ERPF but does not increase GFR in all subjects. 2. To determine the potential therapeutic use of DA in elderly subjects with CCF, we studied 17 patients (5 male) aged 79.9 years (range 68 to 93 years) admitted to hospital for inpatient treatment of CCF resistant to diuretic and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. The effects of a single infusion DA at 2.5 micrograms kg-1 min-1 on GFR and ERPF were assessed in a double-blind, placebo controlled prospective study. 3. There were no significant differences in GFR or ERPF between control and DA. A reduction in GFR was seen in some patients. 4. DA at low dosage was not shown to benefit elderly patients with resistant CCF, and in some patients was detrimental. Higher doses or a combination with other inotropes may be necessary for a renal effect in elderly patients.