Results of directional coronary atherectomy during multicenter preapproval testing. The US Directional Coronary Atherectomy Investigator Group

Percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspectives, current status, and future directions

In the twenty-six years since Gruntzig introduced a simple balloon angioplasty technique, percutaneous coronary intervention has undergone extraordinary growth and has now surpassed bypass surgery in frequency of performance. Several critical breakthrough technologies account for this remarkable progress: intracoronary stents have increased success rates and reduced restenosis, adjunctive antiplatelet therapy has reduced periprocedural complications, and restenosis after stent placement has been effectively treated with local radiation. Most recently, drug-eluting stents coated with cell-cycle inhibitors have shown great promise for further reducing restenosis, possibly to negligible levels.

Intracoronary beta brachytherapy as a treatment option for high-risk refractory in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Vascular (VBT) has clearly been shown in multiple clinical trials to decrease restenosis rates for in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, patients enrolled in these randomized clinical trials represent a select group, and the efficacy of VBT in patients with ISR who were excluded from these controlled trials due to more complex coronary anatomy requires further investigation. This study sought to define the angiographic and clinical profile and outcomes of these high-risk patients with ISR who were excluded from the randomized clinical trials and who received VBTusing Strontium-90 (Sr-90) using the Novoste Beta-Cath System through a Compassionate Use Protocol (CUP).

METHODS

The study was designed as a single center, prospective, open label registry trial evaluating the use of VBT on complex instent restenotic lesions in patients who were excluded from the START and START 40 trials. In general, these patients included those with saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions, long lesions (>35 mm), and patients with a history of more than three prior interventions. VBT using Sr-90 was delivered using the Novoste Beta-Cath System after successful angioplasty. The predetermined primary endpoint was freedom from target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 8 months, one and two years. The secondary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and TVR at 8 months, one year, and two years.

RESULTS

Between September 4, 1998 and December 6, 2000, 32 patients were treated with VBT under the UCP protocol. The mean duration of follow up was 15.3 +/- 8.3 months. There were 9 major cardiac events at eight months including one death, one acute myocardial infarction and 7 TVR. Excluding the one patient who died, 33 lesions were available for follow-up. The rate of TVR in this high-risk patient population was 21.1% (n = 7/33 lesions). The method of revascularization included one bypass surgery and 6 repeat percutaneous coronary interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial demonstrates that utilization of the Beta-Cath System using Sr-90 for the treatment of ISR in a patient population excluded from the randomized clinical trials due to unfavorable lesions characteristics is feasible appears to be associated TVR rates that compare favorably with the event rates of patients enrolled in other trials enrolling lower-risk groups.

Procedural results and late clinical outcomes after placement of three or more stents in single coronary lesions

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have suggested higher procedural and long-term complications among patients treated with multiple stents for diffuse lesions and/or long dissections.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To evaluate procedural success, major complications, and clinical outcomes (> or = 1 year) in a consecutive series of patients treated with multiple (> or = 3) contiguous stents in single lesions, we evaluated in-hospital and long-term (1-year) clinical outcomes in 117 consecutive patients treated with > or = 3 coronary stents compared with a concurrent series of patients treated with 1 or 2 stents (n=1673) between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1995. Multiple stents were implanted more often in larger vessels, in the right coronary artery or saphenous vein grafts, and for unfavorable lesion characteristics, including long (>20 mm), calcified, ulcerated, thrombotic, and/or flow-obstructing lesions. Overall procedural success was obtained in 97.4% of patients and was similar whether 1 or 2 versus > or = 3 stents were used. Non-Q-wave MI (CK-MB > or = 5 times normal) was more frequent after > or = 3 stents (22.8% versus 13.4%, P=.005). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 14.6% for 1 or 2 stents and 13.3% for > or = 3 stents (P=.70). There was no difference in death (2.2% versus 0.9%, P=.34) or Q-wave MI (1.4% versus 0.9%, P=.64) between the two groups (1 or 2 stents versus > or = 3 stents, respectively), and overall cardiac event-free survival was similar during follow-up (P=.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with multiple (> or = 3) contiguous stents compared with 1 or 2 stents have (1) similar in-hospital procedural success and major complications despite having more unfavorable lesion characteristics, (2) a higher rate of procedural non-Q-wave MI, and (3) similar TLR and overall major cardiac event rates during 1 year of follow-up.

'Optimal' directional coronary atherectomy: final results of the Optimal Atherectomy Restenosis Study (OARS)

BACKGROUND

Previous clinical trials of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) have failed to show significant improvement in early or late outcomes compared with balloon angioplasty (PTCA). The present study tested the hypothesis that more aggressive "optimal" atherectomy could be performed safely to produce larger initial lumen diameters and a lower late restenosis rate.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The present study was a prospective multicenter registry of consecutive patients undergoing optimal DCA of de novo or restenotic lesions in 3.0- to 4.5-mm native coronary arteries. Optimal DCA was defined as using a 7F atherectomy device and adjunctive PTCA if necessary to achieve a < 15% residual stenosis. Six-month angiographic and 1-year clinical follow-up was planned in all patients. A total of 199 patients with 213 lesions met eligibility criteria for enrollment. Short-term procedural success was achieved in 97.5%, with a major complication rate (death, emergency bypass surgery, or Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI]) of 2.5%. There were no early deaths. Non-Q-wave MI (CK-MB > 3 times normal) occurred in 14% of patients. Mean reference vessel diameter was 3.28 mm. Mean diameter stenosis was reduced from 63.5% to a final stenosis of 7%. Late 1-year clinical follow-up revealed one cardiac death and a target lesion revascularization rate of 17.8%. The angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months was 28.9%, with the major predictor of restenosis being a smaller postprocedure lumen diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal DCA produced a low residual percent diameter stenosis and a lower restenosis rate than seen in previous trials without an increase in early or late major adverse events.

Problems in the evaluation of new devices for coronary intervention: what have we learned since 1989?

The objectives of this study are to review the problems associated with the evaluation of new devices, the progress made in that evaluation process since 1989, and the role played by the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registry. In 1988-1989, the first wave of new coronary devices (stents, atherectomy, laser catheters) were entering clinical investigation. It seemed unlikely that the small manufacturer-run registries used to gain approval for earlier balloon catheters would be adequate to evaluate the host of complex new devices, each of which might be used for a restricted set of anatomic indications. Moreover, the wide range of arbitrary definitions then in use for fundamental outcomes (such as success, complication, and restenosis), effectively precluded meaningful device-to-device comparisons. Against this backdrop, the NACI registry was formed with National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute funding to provide an independent and standardized evaluation of the first 8 new devices under evaluation in the United States, across the broad range of their application. The registry employed a unique modular form set to track the sequence of events during complex cases in which serial new devices and balloon angioplasty might be used, either in a planned way, or an unplanned way (to treat complications or suboptimal results). Outcomes were subjected to standardized criteria for (1) the reason for device use (planned, unplanned); (2) success (device, lesion, and procedural success); (3) complications (a) major (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and emergency coronary artery bypass grafting); or (b) other (groin complications, non-wave myocardial infarction, etc.); and (4) clinical restenosis (any subsequent revascularization, target lesion revascularization). Separate funding for an angiographic core laboratory was obtained in 1992, which analyzed 3,936 (88.9%) of the 4,429 films obtained on patients enrolled between November 1990 and March 1994. The NACI registry has addressed a broad range of problems inherent in the evaluation of new devices for coronary intervention. Whereas the approval process has moved progressively towards randomized clinical trials (and away from registries), the NACI registry offers a unique view of current practice, outside the narrow scope of the limited number of randomized trials that have been performed to date. This article shows, however, that we have learned about more than the devices themselves since 1989-we have also learned about the importance of knowing the reason for device use, using precise definitions of endpoint variables, understanding the financial and reimbursement ramifications of new device trials, and upholding strict investigator ethics during the conduct of such evaluations.

Short- and long-term outcome of narrowed saphenous vein bypass graft: a comparison of Palmaz-Schatz stent, directional coronary atherectomy, and balloon angioplasty

Percutaneous treatment of saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis has been established as an alternative to repeat coronary artery bypass grafting. Intracoronary Palmaz-Schatz stent (PSS) and directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) have been suggested to provide better short- and long-term results than balloon angioplasty. Records of 840 patients with 931 SVG lesions treated with PSS (121 patients, 132 lesions), DCA (103 patients, 107 lesions), and balloon angioplasty (616 patients, 692 lesions) were reviewed. Inhospital and long-term outcome were compared among treated groups. The groups had similar clinical and angiographic baseline characteristics except for higher previously dilated grafts in the stent group and graft location among devices. Stent placement was angiographically successful in 99%, DCA in 95%, and balloon angioplasty in 93% of the lesions (p = 0.03). Quantitative angiography revealed a larger lumen diameter after procedure after PSS (3.2 mm) and DCA (3.1 mm) compared with 2.4 mm after balloon angioplasty (p = 0.0001). Angiographic complications (abrupt closure, severe dissections, or distal embolization) were evident in eight (6.1%) lesions after PSS placement, in 17 (15.9%) after DCA, and in 61 (8.8%) after balloon angioplasty. Serious in-hospital clinical complications (death, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, or Q-wave myocardial infarction) were similar among devices. Survival rates were similar among the groups (p = 0.15). Repeat revascularization at follow-up was reported in 58 (60.4%) of patients after PSS, in 48 (51.1%) after DCA, and in 280 (49.4%) after balloon angioplasty. Correlates of additional revascularization at follow-up were older grafts, calcific lesions, previously dilated grafts, longer lesions, and patients with lower ejection fractions (odds ratio 1.06, 1.34, 1.43, 1.04, and 1.01, respectively). Correlates of mortality rate at follow-up were older patients, patients with lower ejection fractions, and distal embolization (odds ratio 1.04, 1.04, and 1.92, respectively). These data suggest that in patents with SVG stenosis the initial success and morbidity rates are similar when comparing PSS and DCA with balloon angioplasty. Although a larger lumen is obtained with PSS and DCA, patients who underwent balloon angioplasty had similar rates of cardiac events and requirements for additional procedures at follow-up.

Results of directional coronary atherectomy in Northern New England. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group

The role of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) in interventional cardiology remains uncertain. We report the Northern New England regional experience with DCA from 1991 to 1994. Data were collected on 11,178 patients having had an intervention on a single lesion in a single vessel (798 DCAs; 10,380 percutaneous transluminal angioplasties [PTCA]). The use of DCA increased from 1.8% of interventions in 1991 to 10% in 1994. Compared with PTCA, DCA patients were younger, more often men, had more 1-vessel disease and more coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). DCA was more often used in the left anterior descending artery, in vein grafts, for restenoses, for subtotal occlusions, and with type A lesions. Angiographic success (96.7%) and clinical success (93%) were good. Adverse events were rare: mortality 0.9%, emergent CABG 2.2%, nonfatal myocardial infarction 2.8%. After adjusting for case-mix, there was no difference between DCA and PTCA for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 to 2.43, p = 0.95) or need for emergent CABG (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.10, p = 0.34). Atherectomy patients were more likely to have a nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.20, p <0.01), to sustain an injury to the femoral or brachial artery (OR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.52 to 5.51, p <0.01), and to have a clinically successful procedure (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.88, p = 0.05). Our results support the relative safety and effectiveness of DCA as its use disseminated into the region.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on percutaneous revascularization (CAVEAT-I). CAVEAT-I Investigators. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial

We examined the relation between diabetes mellitus and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I), a randomized trial comparing treatment with either percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or directional atherectomy for de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Acute success and complication rates, 6-month angiographic restenosis rates, and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing each procedure. Acute success rates between diabetic (n = 191) and nondiabetic (n = 821) patients were similar for both revascularization techniques. Except for the need for dialysis, complication rates were also similar. Six months after atherectomy, diabetic patients had significantly more angiographic restenosis than nondiabetics (59.7% vs 47.4%) and significantly smaller minimum luminal diameters (1.20 vs 1.40 mm). Diabetics undergoing atherectomy required more frequent bypass surgery (12.8% vs 8.5%) and more repeat percutaneous revascularizations (36.5% vs 28.1%) than nondiabetics undergoing atherectomy. Restenosis rates, minimum luminal diameters and repeat revascularizations between diabetics and nondiabetics undergoing angioplasty were similar. The higher restenosis and repeat revascularization rates and the smaller minimum luminal diameter at follow-up in diabetic patients suggest that atherectomy may provide only modest benefit for these patients. The increased restenosis rate in diabetics undergoing atherectomy (but not angioplasty) requires further evaluation.

Long-term clinical follow-up after directional coronary atherectomy

Although several studies have been done to assess the safety, efficacy, and angiographic restenosis rates of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA), there have been no studies to document the need for repeat revascularization of the target vessel based purely on recurrence of symptoms. To answer this question, clinical and angiographic data were obtained for 187 consecutive patients undergoing this procedure on a native coronary artery utilizing a lesion specific approach in a referral hospital. Most of the patients had anginal symptoms that were not well controlled with medical therapy. The decision to perform DCA was based on the lesion characteristics (i.e., eccentric, ulcerated, or irregular discrete lesions in a large epicardial vessel). The procedure was successful in 96% of patients. In-hospital major complications were seen in 6 patients (3%) including acute myocardial infarction in 3 (1.5%) and emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the other 3 (1.5%). There were no deaths. Among 141 consecutive successful patients on whom the procedure was performed between January 1992 and June 1994, 128 (91%) were contacted. At 6 months, revascularization was required in 20 patients for recurrent anginal symptoms, and there were no deaths or myocardial infarctions. The clinical restenosis rate, therefore, was 15.6%. At long-term follow-up (25 +/- 9 months), revascularization was performed in 3 more patients. One patient had a myocardial infarction and 3 patients died of noncardiac causes. Among those without clinical restenosis, 83% patients were asymptomatic and the rest had infrequent chest pains effectively managed with medications. The patients in the study group were using an average of 1.2 cardiac medications. Quality of life improved in 74% of the patients. Thus, in this study utilizing a lesion specific approach, the success rate for DCA was comparable to the published trials and in-hospital complications were few. The long-term clinical outcome was favorable with a low rate of clinical restenosis requiring repeat revascularization.

Increased risk of non-Q wave myocardial infarction after directional atherectomy is platelet dependent: evidence from the EPIC trial. Evaluation of c7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade on adverse outcomes, especially non-Q wave myocardial infarction, in patients undergoing directional atherectomy in the Evaluation of c7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications (EPIC) trial.

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials comparing directional atherectomy with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) have demonstrated modest benefits favoring atherectomy but at a cost of increased acute ischemic complications, notably non-Q wave myocardial infarction. The mechanism for this excess risk is unknown.

METHODS

Of 2,038 high risk patients undergoing coronary intervention in the EPIC trial, directional atherectomy was performed in 197 (10%). Patients randomly received the chimeric glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antibody 7E3 (c7E3), as a bolus or a bolus and 12-h infusion or placebo. Study end points included death, myocardial infarction, repeat intervention or bypass surgery.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing directional atherectomy had a lower baseline risk for acute complications but had a higher incidence of any myocardial infarction (10.7% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.021) and non-Q wave myocardial infarction (9.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.006). Bolus and infusion of c7E3 reduced non-Q wave myocardial infarctions by 71% after atherectomy (15.4% for placebo vs. 4.5% for bolus and infusion, p = 0.046). Non-Q wave myocardial infarction rates after PTCA were not affected by c7E3, although Q wave myocardial infarctions were reduced from 2.6% to 0.8% (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The EPIC trial confirmed the increased risk of non-Q wave myocardial infarction with directional atherectomy use compared with PTCA. A bolus and 12-h infusion of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor c7E3 abolished this excess risk. Directional atherectomy-related non-Q wave myocardial infarction appears to be platelet aggregation dependent.

Salvage atherectomy: using retrieved tissue to determine the etiology of acute closure

Directional coronary atherectomy was successfully performed in the mid-left anterior descending artery at the site of failed balloon angioplasty. We presumed that intracoronary thrombus had resulted in acute vessel closure following balloon angioplasty, due to the angiographic appearance of the lesion and the clinical situation. However, examination of the extracted specimen from the atherectomy device revealed predominantly atheromatous tissue with minimal thrombus.

Influence of stenotic lesion morphology on immediate and long-term (6 months) angiographic outcome: comparative analysis of directional coronary atherectomy versus standard balloon angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether preprocedural lesion morphology differentially affects the outcome of directional coronary atherectomy versus standard balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND

Despite previous studies (Canadian Coronary Atherectomy Trial [CCAT]/Coronary Angioplasty Verus Excisional Atherectomy Trial [CAVEAT]), directional coronary atherectomy continues to be recommended on the basis of lesion-specific features, although the validity of this approach has never been proved.

METHODS

A retrospective, subgroup analysis of the CCAT data base (group average +/- SD) was performed.

RESULTS

In the long term (6 months), both procedures were equally successful in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (directional atherectomy 0.62 +/- 0.70 mm vs. coronary angioplasty 0.70 +/- 0.72 mm, p = NS), with atherectomy tending to perform best in relatively "simple" lesions (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association [ACC/AHA] type A: atherectomy 0.57 +/- 0.70 mm vs. angioplasty 0.50 +/- 0.77 mm; ACC/AHA type B1: atherectomy 0.65 +/- 0.68 mm vs. angioplasty 0.60 +/- 0.68 mm) and those with moderate dystrophic calcification (atherectomy 0.79 +/- 0.56 mm vs. angioplasty 0.45 +/- 0.73 mm). Although greatest minimal lumen diameter gains were seen in larger (> 3 mm) coronary arteries (atherectomy 0.76 +/- 0.62 mm vs angioplasty 0.80 +/- 0.72 mm, p = NS) and those with severe obstruction (preprocedural minimal lumen diameter < 1.0 mm: atherectomy 0.80 +/- 0.62 mm vs. angioplasty 0.84 +/- 0.63 mm, p = NS), neither technique was superior, and eccentric stenoses (symmetry index < 0.5) had similar outcomes (atherectomy 0.59 +/- 0.49 mm vs. angioplasty 0.62 +/- 0.65 mm, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

These data refute many preconceptions regarding the choice of directional coronary atherectomy on the basis of anatomic criteria.

Reduced acute thrombus formation results in decreased neointimal proliferation after coronary angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

We tested the hypothesis that reduced acute platelet deposition after angioplasty results in reduced late neointimal proliferation.

BACKGROUND

Platelet-mediated mechanisms contribute to smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration.

METHODS

Indium-111-labeled platelets were injected 16 h before coronary stent angioplasty in 10 Göttinger minipigs: group 1 (n = 5) = heparin (100-U/kg bolus) before angioplasty; group 2 (n = 5) = recombinant hirudin (CGP 39393, 1.0-mg/kg body weight bolus intravenously), followed by subcutaneous doses of 6 to 10 mg/kg every 8 h. Furthermore, stent angioplasty was performed in coronary arteries of 16 minipigs: group 3 (n = 5, nine stents) = 100 U/kg heparin only; group 4 (n = 5, 10 stents) = 1-mg/kg bolus hirudin before and 45 min after angioplasty; group 5 (n = 6, 11 stents) = hirudin (1-mg/kg intravenous bolus) before and 45 min after angioplasty, followed by 6 to 10 mg/kg subcutaneously every 8 h.

RESULTS

In segments with deep arterial injury, the number of platelets/angioplasty segment in group 2 after 72 h (mean 21, range 9.7 to 39.7 x 10(6)) was significantly less than that in group 1 (mean 375, range 72 to 787 x 10(6)). Morphometric analysis after 4 weeks showed no difference between groups in degree of vessel wall injury. Mean (+/- SD) neointimal thickness was 0.70 +/- 0.06 mm in group 3 and was significantly reduced in both group 4 (0.46 +/- 0.11 mm) and group 5 (0.48 +/- 0.21 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The direct thrombin inhibitor hirudin significantly reduces platelet deposition up to 72 h after coronary stent angioplasty. A hirudin bolus alone as well as continued subcutaneous administration for 14 days substantially reduced neointimal proliferation compared with heparin 4 weeks after coronary stent angioplasty in minipigs.

Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease

Nearly 40 years after its invention, the angiogram is still considered by most physicians to be the "gold standard" for defining coronary anatomy. Careful investigations have revealed many deficiencies inherent in this approach. The purpose of this article is to outline the evidence that our current preoccupation with coronary "luminology" may be misguided and to propose a rational paradigm for future practice and investigation. Angiography depicts coronary anatomy from a planar two-dimensional silhouette of the lumen. Angiography is limited in resolution to four or five line pairs per millimeter. Confounding factors include vessel tortuosity, overlap of structures, and the effects of lumen shape. After intervention, a hazy, broadened silhouette may overestimate the actual gain in lumen size. Studies show marked disparity between the apparent severity of lesions and their physiological effects. After myocardial infarction, cardiologists too often do not make an attempt to demonstrate the physiological significance of the stenosis before performing percutaneous coronary revascularization. Similarly, the allure of a better, more gratifying angiogram with new interventional devices appears to be a dominant factor in their popularity. Interventional cardiologists should be aware that techniques yielding marked angiographic benefit may also generate important but unrecognized hazards. The dissociation between the angiogram and clinical outcome should influence future research efforts. Our review of the literature indicates that we may benefit from shifting the current focus and preoccupation with coronary luminology to achieving the desired clinical end point: promoting survival and long-term freedom from myocardial infarction and the disabling symptoms of coronary heart disease.

Observational versus randomized medical device testing before and after market approval--the atherectomy-versus-angioplasty controversy

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was developed in the late 1970s as a nonsurgical alternative for revascularization of atherosclerotic coronary arteries. It gained widespread acceptance without a controlled trial. Introduced in 1986, directional coronary atherectomy was the first of other recently developed coronary devices that sought to improve on the results of angioplasty. It was approved in 1990 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the basis of observational data. Its use expanded rapidly, reaching over 35,000 procedures in 1992, accounting for more than 10% of all interventions. After premarket approval, two major randomized trials tested the hypothesis that atherectomy would be superior to angioplasty. Their results raised a cautionary flag and stood in contrast to projections made from prior observational data. It is concluded that randomized controlled trials validate claims of relative efficacy and safety of competing medical technologies, a lesson reflected in recent changes in policy at the FDA.

Predictors of restenosis after excimer laser coronary angioplasty

One hundred twenty-five lesions successfully treated with excimer laser coronary angioplasty at 3 centers were analyzed in a central core laboratory using detailed quantitative angiographic analysis. Sixty-seven narrowings had restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis at restudy). Correlates of restenosis were as follows: baseline diameter stenosis was 79% in the restenosis group versus 71% in the group without restenosis (p = 0.0002), baseline minimal diameter stenosis was 0.55 mm in the restenosis group versus 0.72 mm in the group without restenosis (p = 0.006), final diameter stenosis was 40% in the restenosis group versus 32% in the group without restenosis (p = 0.002), lesion length > or = 7 mm was present in 43% of the restenosis group versus 21% in the group without restenosis (p = 0.009), and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial flow 0 to 2 was 33% in the restenosis group versus 15% in the group without restenosis (p = 0.025). The strongest multivariate correlate of restenosis was the baseline diameter stenosis (p = 0.003). Whereas most predictors were not controllable, achieving a low residual diameter stenosis that is operator-dependent can favorably influence the restenosis rate.

A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. CAVEAT-II Investigators

BACKGROUND

Directional coronary atherectomy and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty have both been used in symptomatic patients with coronary saphenous vein bypass graft stenoses. The relative merits of plaque excision and removal versus balloon dilatation remain uncertain. We compared outcomes after directional coronary atherectomy or angioplasty in patients with de novo bypass graft stenoses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-four North American and European sites randomized 305 patients with de novo vein graft lesions to atherectomy (n = 149) or angioplasty (n = 156). Quantitative coronary angiography at a core laboratory assessed initial and 6-month results. Initial angiographic success was greater with atherectomy (89.2% versus 79.0%), as was initial luminal gain (1.45 versus 1.12 mm, P < .001). Distal embolization was increased with atherectomy (P = .012), and a trend was shown toward more non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (P = .09). Although the 6-month net minimum luminal diameter gain was 0.68 mm for atherectomy and 0.50 mm for angioplasty, the restenosis rates were similar, 45.6% for atherectomy and 50.5% for angioplasty (P = .491). At 6 months, there was a trend toward decreased repeated target-vessel interventions for atherectomy (P = .092); in addition, 13.2% of patients treated with atherectomy versus 22.4% of the angioplasty patients (P = .041) required repeated percutaneous intervention of the initial target lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

Atherectomy of de novo vein graft lesions was associated with improved initial angiographic success and luminal diameter but also with increased distal embolization. There was no difference in 6-month restenosis rates, although primary atherectomy patients tended to require fewer target-vessel revascularization procedures.

Molecular biology: insight into the causes and prevention of restenosis after arterial intervention

Very little is known about the development of postatherectomy or postangioplasty restenosis. Morphologically, restenosis lesions are primarily composed of smooth muscle cells with associated matrix proteins and develop within 3-6 months. Although some degree of smooth muscle cell proliferation is a necessary part of the healing process after injury, it is unclear why only some individuals develop clinically significant lesions. Platelet deposition and release of growth factors have been postulated to be important in initiating the cellular growth response after vascular injury. Current data suggest that growth factors synthesized locally in the vessel wall may be very important in controlling smooth muscle proliferation. In addition, atherosclerotic plaques contain many procoagulant proteins that are exposed by angioplasty or atherectomy. These proteins stimulate a coagulation response and the activation of thrombin, resulting in platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. Thrombin mediates several biologic responses that may facilitate vascular lesion formation and can act directly as a smooth muscle mitogen. Vascular lesion formation as a result of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or atherectomy may be stimulated by a combination of factors, including platelet deposition and thrombin action, ultimately generating an autocrine growth response in the vessel wall.