Preliminary results with neoadjuvant therapy and resection for esophageal carcinoma

A phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9708)

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin in patients with Stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The primary endpoint was proportion of complete response (%CR).

METHODS

Patients with Stage I (T1N0M0) ESCC, aged 20-75 years, without indication of endoscopic mucosal resection were eligible. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) (day 1) and 5-FU 700 mg/m(2)/day (days 1-4) combined with 30 Gy radiotherapy (2 Gy/day, 5 days/week, days 1-21). The cycle was repeated twice with 1-week split. Salvage surgery was recommended for residual tumor or local recurrence.

RESULTS

From December 1997 to June 2000, 72 patients were enrolled. No ineligible patient or major protocol violation was observed. There were 63 CRs for %CR of 87.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 77.6-94.1]. Six patients with residual tumor successfully underwent esophagectomy. There was no Grade 4 toxicity. Four-year survival proportion was 80.5% (95% CI: 71.3-89.7), and 4-year major relapse-free survival proportion was 68% (95% CI: 57.3-78.8) (mucosal recurrence removed by endoscopy was not counted as an event).

CONCLUSIONS

High CR proportion and survival proportion with mild toxicity suggest that this regimen could be considered as a candidate of new standard treatment to be compared with surgery in patients with Stage I ESCC.

Positron emission tomography for monitoring response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma

AIMS

The aim of this review is to consolidate our knowledge on an important and rapidly expanding area of expertise. Numerous methods for predicting response (in terms of pathological response and survival) to neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy/chemo-radiotherapy) in oesophageal and junctional cancers have been proposed. This review concerns itself only with the use of positron emission tomography for such a purpose. At present there are no standardised criteria amongst PET trials as to what determines a response according to PET, what is the optimal time to perform PET in relation to the timing of neoadjuvant therapy, and what is the ideal method of quantifying PET tracer uptake.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed of PubMed, Ovid and Embase websites to identify studies, in the English language, using the search terms: PET; oesophageal; oesophago-gastric; survival; cancer; response; chemotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy. The reference lists were searched manually to identify further relevant studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were identified, all using (18)FDG as the tracer, using PET to predict response in terms of pathological response and survival following neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy/chemo-radiotherapy). PET had a varying degree of success in predicting both pathological response and survival outcomes, with only one study using PET to influence management decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

PET seems a promising technique, but large-scale conclusions are hindered by small study numbers, lack of criteria as to what constitutes a response and markedly differing PET imaging times. A large randomised trial concerning a homogeneous group of patients and tumours is required before PET might be used to influence management.

Radiochemotherapy of esophageal cancer

Cancer of the esophagus continues to be a threat to public health. The common practice is esophagectomy for surgically resectable tumors and radiochemotherapy for locally advanced, unresectable tumors. However, local regional tumor control and overall survival of esophageal cancer patients after the standard therapies remain poor, approximately 30% of patients treated with surgery only will develop local recurrence, and 50% to 60% patients treated with radiochemotherapy only fail local regionally due to persistent disease or local recurrence. Esophagectomy after radiochemotherapy or preoperative radiochemotherapy has increased the complete surgical resection rate and local regional control without a significant survival benefit. Induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative radiochemotherapy has produced encouraging results. In addition to patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors, involvement of celiac axis nodes, number of positive lymph nodes after preoperative radiochemotherapy, incomplete pathologic response, high metabolic activity on positron emission tomography scan after radiochemotherapy, and incomplete surgical resection are factors associated with a poor outcome. Radiochemotherapy followed by surgery is associated with significant adverse effects, including treatment-related pneumonitis, postoperative pulmonary complications, esophagitis and pericarditis. The incidence and severity of the adverse effects are associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy dosimetric factors. Innovative treatment strategies including physically and biologically molecular targeted therapy is needed to improve the treatment outcome of patients with esophageal cancer.

Phase II study of preoperative paclitaxel/cisplatin with radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Preoperative paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy may improve the response rates and survival in patients with localized esophageal cancer. We evaluated paclitaxel-based induction chemoradiotherapy in patients with localized esophageal cancer to determine its feasibility, clinical response, pathologic response, and overall survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1995 and 1998, 50 patients were enrolled in this study. At study entry, patients were categorized as either resectable or unresectable according to evaluation by an experienced thoracic surgeon. All patients were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on Day 1, 29 with radiotherapy to 3,000 cGy in 15 fractions. Resectable patients underwent esophagectomy 4 weeks later. Postoperatively, patients received two cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on Day 1 and 5-fluorouracil 350 mg/m2 and leucovorin 300 mg on Days 1-3, given every 28 days. Patients who were deemed unsuitable for resection from the outset continued radiotherapy to a total dose of 6,000 cGy.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients, all began neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 40 patients underwent surgery, and 25 patients completed postoperative chemotherapy. A pathologic complete response was seen in 7 patients (17.5%). Patients with a pathologic response had a median survival of 32.4 months vs. 14.4 months for nonresponders (p < 0.001). Patients with a clinical response had a median survival of 25.2 months compared with 15.6 months for nonresponders (p = 0.002). At a median follow up of 19.8 months (range 2.4-100.8), the median survival was 20.4 months and the 3-year overall survival rate was 23.2%.

CONCLUSION

Although preoperative cisplatin/paclitaxel with 3,000 cGy was tolerable, this multimodality regimen did not appear to be superior to standard cisplatin/5-fluorouracil-containing regimens and its use is not recommended.

Radiation and chemoradiation therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma

The aims of preoperative chemoradiation therapy (preop-CRT) for esophageal adenocarcinoma are to reduce incomplete local resection (R1,R2), local and systemic recurrences that are reported in up to 30% of patients who undergo surgery alone. Phase II studies of preop-CRT, with radiation doses in the 40-50 Gy range, and concurrent chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-cisplatin +/- paclitaxel, or cisplatin-paclitaxel, have reported subsequent RO resection rates of 80%-100%, with tumor sterilization achieved in 8%-49% of cases, and consequently improved local control. New chemotherapy regimens omitting 5-FU have reduced the incidence of severe esophagitis, unplanned hospitalization, with comparable efficacy. Among three randomised trials that compared preop-CRT to surgery alone, one shown a debatable survival advantage. Reducing local recurrence rates lead to a switch to more distant failures, and increasing the radiation dose beyond 45 Gy appears to be of little value. However, it should be remembered that preop-CRT has associated toxicity, and may increase postoperative mortality. Novel strategies, which include induction with chemotherapy followed by preop-CRT, and for radiation therapy, three dimensional conformation techniques, image fusioning, and improved definition of treatment volumes, are still considered experimental and should be tested in specialized centers.

Clinical implications of the extent of invasion of T3 esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an accurate imaging modality for local staging of esophageal cancer. We aimed to determine if depth of tumor invasion beyond muscularis propria (MP), as determined by preoperative EUS, is predictive of tumor recurrence or survival (a positive change in mortality) in patients with T3 esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Records and images of all patients with T3 N1 M0 esophageal cancer staged with EUS at our institution between January 1999 and October 2003 were reviewed. EUS images were independently reviewed by five blinded endosonographers and tumors were classified as minimally invasive (invasion < 3 mm beyond MP) or advanced (invasion > or = 3 mm beyond MP) T3 disease.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-five patients with esophageal cancer underwent EUS for staging and 39 patients with T3 N1 esophageal cancer were identified; 17 patients had minimally invasive T3 disease and 22 had advanced disease. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by esophagectomy. Median follow up was 13 months. Adjusting for age and sex, minimally invasive disease was not associated with a statistically significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.88-2.41, P = 0.14) or mortality (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI: 0.49-1.78, P = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of invasion of T3 esophageal cancer beyond MP, as determined by EUS, is not a significant predictor of tumor recurrence or mortality.

A single institutional phase III trial of preoperative chemotherapy with hyperfractionation radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing surgery alone (S) with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRT-S) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) based on our previous report.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and one patients with stage II/III esophageal SCC were randomized to receive either S (50 patients) or CRT-S (51 patients). The chemoradiotherapy (CRT) consisted of cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 2-5, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 22 combined with radiation therapy (45.6 Gy, 1.2 Gy b.i.d. on days 1-28). Surgery was performed 3-4 weeks after radiotherapy was completed. For patients with disease that was stable or responsive to CRT, three additional cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, 5-FU 1000 mg/m(2) on days 2-5 every 4 weeks) were given after surgical resection.

RESULTS

The median age was 62 years. The toxicity of CRT was acceptable and did not affect the post-operative morbidity and the duration of hospital stay. Clinical response was 86% including 21% of complete response (CR) rate. Pathological CR was achieved in 43% [95% confidence interval (CI) 27-59] of the patients who underwent surgery after CRT. At a median follow-up of 25 months, median overall survival (OS) was 27.3 months in S and 28.2 months in CRT-S (P = 0.69). Event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years was 51% in S and 49% in CRT-S (P = 0.93). This trial, which was statistically powered to detect a relatively large difference in 2-year survival rate from 30% to 50% with 80% power, was discontinued at interim analysis because of the unexpectedly high drop-out rate for esophagectomy (31%) and resultant excessive locoregional failure rate in CRT-S arm (22% versus 12%, P = 0.31), though it was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Although preoperative CRT induced high clinical and pathological response, there was no statistically significant benefit in OS and EFS.

En-bloc esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The operative approach for esophageal cancer varies from simple palliative resection to extended esophagectomy with 3-field lymph-node dissection or en-bloc esophagectomy (EBE) depending on tumor and patient status and surgical strategy of the surgeon. The merits and demerits of such EBE are yet to be determined.

METHODS

A literature review was done regarding EBE for esophageal cancer.

RESULTS

Twenty articles describing EBE were reported from experienced institutions during the last 20 years and were selected for this study. The conclusions drawn from those articles showed that EBE would be a safe procedure with acceptable morbidity and low mortality rates when performed by an experienced surgeon. When strict patient selection criteria were maintained, this procedure decreased locoregional recurrence and improved long-term survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

EBE would be the treatment of choice in selected patients presenting with esophageal cancer. Development of meticulous preoperative risk assessment and optimum postoperative care may further improve the acceptability of this procedure with minimum morbidity and acceptable mortality rates.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma--a single institutional study

A prospective phase II study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was conducted from May 1993 to March 1996. A total of 88 patients fitted the eligibility criteria and were treated with two courses of induction chemotherapy (cisplatin 60 mg/m2/day on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m2/day on days 2-6) with concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy (48 Gy/40 fractions/4 weeks) followed by esophagectomy or definitive CRT comprising 4 cycles of cisplatin/5-FU and hyperfractionated radiotherapy (additional 12 Gy) with intracavitary brachytherapy (9 Gy). Clinical response and downstaging were achieved in 83% and 42% of the patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 77 months, median survival time was 18 months with a 5-year survival rate of 23%. The clinical responses to CRT and surgery were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Among the intended surgery group (n = 52), 41 (79%) patients underwent surgery and 36 had a resection with a pathologic complete response rate of 43%. When compared with a matched historical control (n = 40), there was a significant survival benefit in the multimodality arm (p = 0.04). This multimodality therapy was feasible and its efficacy was promising, especially when surgical resection was performed. The therapeutic benefit of neoadjuvant CRT remains to be assessed in large well-designed randomized trials, one of which is ongoing at our institution.

Correlation of EUS measurement with pathologic assessment of neoadjuvant therapy response in esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

EUS-measured reduction in tumor size after neoadjuvant therapy has previously been correlated with downstaging and improved survival in patients with esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to determine whether tumor changes measured by EUS correspond to pathologically assessed chemoradiotherapy-induced tumor regression.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with esophageal cancer treated with combined modality treatment were studied. After initial EUS, patients completed a cisplatin/carboplatinum, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy regimen and underwent repeat EUS before resection. A positive response on EUS was defined as a 50% reduction in maximal tumor cross-sectional area. Chemoradiotherapy-induced tumor regression was assessed in resection specimens by using a previously defined pathologic scoring system based on the extent of tumor proliferation into adjacent fibrosis.

RESULTS

Pathologic tumor regression was present in 23, indeterminate in 5, and minimal or absent in 13 patients. EUS measured a positive response in 20 of 23 (87%) patients with CRT-induced tumor regression and a negative response in 10 of 13 (77%) patients with absent tumor regression (p < 0.001). EUS had a positive predictive value of 80% for pathologic tumor regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of tumor size by EUS is a reliable clinical method for assessing pathologic tumor regression before surgery.

Pulmonary complications after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary complications are common in patients who have undergone esophagectomy. There are no good predictive variables for these complications. In addition, the role that preoperative treatment with chemotherapy and radiation may play in postoperative complications remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent esophagectomy by a single surgeon at our institution over a 6-year period. Data were analyzed for a correlation between patient risk factors and pulmonary complications, including mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Complete data were available on 61 patients. Nearly all patients had some pulmonary abnormality (eg, pleural effusion), although most of these were clinically insignificant. Pneumonia was the most common clinically important complication, and 19.7% of patients required prolonged ventilatory support. Significant risk factors identified included impaired pulmonary function, especially for patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than 65% of predicted, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired lung function is a significant risk factor for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Patients with FEV1 less than 65% of predicted appear to be at greatest risk. There also seems to be an associated risk of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy.

The use of chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

The results of treatment for oesophageal carcinoma remain poor and few patients are curable by surgery alone. The use of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) given as a definitive treatment or in combination with surgery may improve locoregional control and survival, when compared with radiotherapy or surgery alone. Using the keywords "chemoradiotherapy" and "radiochemotherapy", a Medline-based literature review (1980-2001) was performed. Additional literature was obtained from original papers and published meeting abstracts. Two-year survival rates of 28-72% in squamous cell carcinoma and 14-29% in adenocarcinoma from definitive CRT were reported. This is comparable to results achievable by surgery alone. The use of preoperative CRT followed by surgery may further improve survival, but current data are insufficient to justify this approach within routine clinical practice. Acute treatment-related toxicity is increased with CRT. In selected patients with localised unresectable oesophageal cancer, definitive CRT is recommended. There are uncertainties about the role of routine surgery following CRT in patients with resectable disease. For the future, the pretreatment staging of patients needs to be improved and standardised, the optimal CRT regimen needs to be defined and the role of predictive markers for CRT response needs to be developed.

Does neoadjuvant chemoradiation downstage esophageal carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is administered to patients with esophageal carcinoma with the belief that this will both downstage the tumor and improve survival. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is currently the most accurate method of staging esophageal cancer for tumor (T) and lymph node (N) status. Because both EUS and neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal carcinoma are relatively new, there are few data examining the relationship between EUS stage and histological stage (the stage after resection) in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

To determine the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on T and N stage as determined by EUS, we retrospectively compared two groups of patients with esophageal cancer staged by EUS. One group (33 patients) underwent neoadjuvant therapy (Walsh protocol: 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and 4000 rads of external beam radiation) followed by resection. The second group (22 patients), a control group, underwent resection without neoadjuvant therapy. We then compared histological stage to determine if there was a downstaging in the patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Survival was evaluated as well.

RESULTS

EUS accurately predicted histologic stage. In the control group EUS overestimated T stage in 3 of 22 (13%), underestimated N stage in 2 of 22 (9%), and overestimated N stage in 2 of 22 (9%) of patients. Preoperative radiochemotherapy downstaged (preoperative EUS stage versus pathologic specimen) 12 of 33 (36%) of patients whereas only 1 of 22 (5%) of patients in the control group was downstaged. Complete response (no tumor found in the surgical specimen) was observed in 5 of 33 (15%) of patients receiving radiochemotherapy. Survival was prolonged significantly in patients receiving radiochemotherapy: 20.6 months versus 9.6 months for those (stage II or III) patients not receiving radiochemotherapy (P <0.01). Operative time, operative blood loss, and length of stay were not significantly different between groups. Perioperative mortality was higher in the radiochemotherapy group (13%) compared with the no radiochemotherapy group (5%) but did not achieve statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS accurately stages esophageal carcinoma. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy downstages esophageal carcinoma for T and N status. In our nonrandomized study, neoadjuvant therapy conferred a significant survival advantage. Operative risk appears to be increased in patients receiving neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy prior to esophagectomy.

Mismatched clinicopathological response after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer

We have been treating patients with operable thoracic esophageal cancer according to our own protocol. It includes the initial concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by continuous CRT or surgery. Patients with good response to initial chemoradiotherapy were allowed to continue chemoradiotherapy, whereas the others were treated with surgery. However, there were two cases which showed discrepancies in the clinicopathological response. Both patients received initial chemoradiotherapy, including two courses of cisplatin (100-120 mg), 5-fluorouracil (750-1000 mg for 4 days) and radiation (44-50 Gy). On completion of the initial chemoradiotherapy, all diagnostic imaging modalities including barium swallow, esophagoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography and thoracic computed tomography strongly implicated residual tumor with a reduction rate of 40-50%. The patients underwent radical esophagectomy 15-20 days after initial chemoradiotherapy. Pathological specimens only revealed thickening of the esophageal wall due to inflammatory change without residual carcinoma. These facts suggest the current limitations of diagnostic images in evaluating the response to chemoradiotherapy.

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer carries a poor prognosis. The 5-year survival rate following resection ranges from 10 to 35 per cent. Recent evidence suggests that the addition of non-surgical treatments to surgery may improve resection rates, reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival. This review examines the role of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

A Medline-based literature review (1980-2000) was performed using the key words 'neoadjuvant or preoperative' and 'chemoradiotherapy or radiochemotherapy'. Additional literature was obtained from original papers and published meeting abstracts.

RESULTS

Forty-six non-randomized and six randomized trials of preoperative CRT were found. Resection rates, pathological complete response (pCR), treatment-related mortality rates and relapse patterns are documented. Improved 5-year survival rates approaching 60 per cent may be achieved following pCR. Three of the six randomized trials show a benefit in either overall survival or disease-free survival compared with surgery alone. Treatment-related toxicity can be significant.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CRT may improve survival. Emerging evidence suggests that CRT alone can achieve similar survival rates to surgery alone. New imaging modalities may help to select which patients require surgery. Larger randomized trials of preoperative CRT or chemotherapy are needed to define optimal regimens and produce higher pCR rates with acceptable toxicity.

Accelerated growth signals and low tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels predict poor outcome in T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the biological nature of T4 esophageal carcinoma growth signals and host defenses.

METHODS

Paraffin-embedded sections from 78 patients with T2 to T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent operation were analyzed with immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Positive cyclin A showed a significantly greater increase in T4 tumors than in those of other stages, and negative p27 showed a significantly greater decrease in T4 tumors than in large T3 stage tumors (tumor size > or = 4.0 cm). Patients with low-grade tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density showed a significantly greater decrease in T4 than in T2. The combination of p27 and cyclin A was a significant independent prognostic factor among T and N factors in multivariate analysis. TIL density was an independent prognostic factor among immunonutritional variables such as serum albumin concentration and the number of total blood lymphocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has a poor prognosis, which is associated with increased p27-negative and cyclin A-positive growth signals in the tumor and with low TIL density in the host.

Analysis of postoperative complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy

Postoperative complications were investigated in 72 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy with esophagectomy. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil (700 mg/m2/day, on days 1 to 5), cisplatinum (70 mg/m2/day, on day 1) and leucovorin (20 mg/m2/day, on days 1 to 5). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy consisted of cisplatinum combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (total dosage of 30-70 Gy). The incidence of postoperative pneumonia (16%) and anastomotic leakage (24%) in the preoperative chemotherapy group was slightly higher than that in the control group (n = 506), and mortality (6.0%) after esophagectomy in the preoperative chemotherapy group was higher than that (2.4%) of the control group. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed more frequently in patients who received two cycles of the chemotherapy than those receiving only one cycle. Postoperative complications occurred more frequently in patients suffering high grade toxicities due to the preoperative chemotherapy. The highest preoperative serum creatinine value correlated to that of postoperative period (r = 0.6494). The use of the preoperative chemoradiotherapy with a total exposure dosage of 60 Gy or more significantly increased the postoperative pneumonia rate (67%; p < 0.05) compared to the group receiving 40 Gy or less. The mortality rate (33%) also increased. The second cycle of the preoperative chemotherapy should be cancelled if patients suffer high grade toxicities during or after the first cycle, and the total exposure dosage of the preoperative chemoradiotherapy should be limited to 40 Gy or less.

Oesophageal cancer treatment: studies, strategies and facts

Esophageal cancer is among the ten most frequent cancers in the world. Once diagnosis is established prognosis is poor with five-year survival rates below 10%. Over the last few years, the evidence--base for treatment of oesophageal cancer has changed with the publication of several important articles in this field. This article reviews these and other relevant publications with focus on current evidence which holds potential for an improvement in survival in oesophageal cancer patients. Prevention and early detection represent the mainstay in the ongoing struggle to improve prognosis, which is most stringently linked to tumor stage. Other efforts have been dedicated to optimise surgical treatment, radiotherapy and chemotherapy and to discover the most efficient combinations of these treatment modalities. Strong but not unanimous evidence in favour of a multimodality approach with chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has accumulated in recent years, and confirmatory trials are presently ongoing. A pathological complete response to chemoradiotherapy has been identified to significantly enhance survival. Among the strategies to achieve higher response rates, variations in the administration of the most commonly used drugs rather than higher drug and radiation dosages seem promising. Occult lymphatic spread has been recognized as a major source of recurrence and has been successfully targeted by three field surgical dissection and extended field radiotherapy. In search of the optimal treatment for patients with oesophageal cancer, a variety of different tracks are being pursued. This review outlines and analyses current treatment approaches and investigates how recent advances may impact on patient management.

Apoptosis in esophageal cancer following induction chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The poor survival of patients with esophageal cancer following esophagectomy has led to intense investigation into combined modality therapy. Based on results from clinical trials examining chemoradiotherapy alone without surgery, resection has come under increased scrutiny and its necessity as a component of a multimodal approach has been questioned. In this study, we examined whether residual tumor cells in esophagectomy specimens following induction chemoradiotherapy are viable and, therefore, provide putative evidence for the appropriateness of esophagectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between August 1991 and January 1995, 46 patients were entered into an induction chemoradiotherapy trial consisting of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, alpha-interferon, and concurrent external beam radiotherapy followed by esophagectomy. Response was determined histologically and apoptosis assessed with a terminal deoxytransferase assay system. p53 status was determined by immunohistochemistry and mutational analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients underwent esophagectomy, 33 of whom had either a complete (n = 10) or partial (n = 23) response. None of the 28 patients with residual tumor in the resected specimen had 100% apoptotic cells and the vast majority of specimens had less than a 10% apoptotic rate. The percentage of apoptotic cells did correlate with tumor differentiation but not with histologic type nor presence of p53 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that resection following upfront chemoradiotherapy is a necessary component of a multimodality approach to esophageal cancer and will ultimately provide superior local-regional control to a nonsurgical approach.

Prognosis of adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, as well as its association with Barrett's esophagus, has been reported previously. We report our experience in treating patients with adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 70 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus treated between November 1988 and April 1996 with preoperative chemoradiation and resection. Demographics, pathologic features, and survival were compared with patients who developed adenocarcinoma of the esophagus without Barrett's. Statistical analyses was performed using Student's t test, Fisher's exact test, and Kaplan-Meier where appropriate.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (46%) patients had adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus. During the last 4 years, 72% (23 of 32) of patients with adenocarcinoma had coexistent Barrett's. No differences in patients with or without Barrett's with regard to age, sex, race, tumor location, preoperative chemotherapy, type of operation, or operative stage were observed. Tumors in patients with Barrett's were larger (p = 0.017), had better differentiation (p = 0.002), and were less likely to have a complete response to preoperative chemoradiation (p = 0.05). Actuarial survival, however, was better in the group with associated Barrett's esophagus (p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus arising in Barrett's esophagus appears to be increasing. It may be distinct clinically and biologically from adenocarcinoma of the esophagus that does not develop in association with Barrett's epithelium. Long-term survival was better in our patients with adenocarcinoma associated with Barrett's esophagus.

High Prevalence of p53 Gene Mutation in Esophageal Cancer

Tissue samples from 24 patients with esophageal cancer were studied to determine the incidence and clinical implications of alterations of the p53 gene. Allelic deletion of chromosome 17p and mutation of the p53 gene were determined by Southern blot analysis and polymerase chain reaction single-stranded conformation polymorphism. Nucleotide sequence analysis was performed using the direct sequencing method when abnormalities were detected. Eighteen of the 24 cases of esophageal cancer showed either gene deletions or mutations of the p53 gene. Among 15 tumors with p53 gene deletion or mutation, 13 point mutations and 2 frame shifts were identified. The clinical data were also analyzed in relation to genetic alteration of the p53 gene. These results indicate that allelic deletion of 17p 13 and mutation of the p53 gene are frequent and may occur simultaneously in esophageal cancer cells. Such changes might be an important step in the development of esophageal cancer. However, the presence of a p53 gene mutation was not significantly associated with tumor stage, nodal stage, age, or smoking. There was no evidence to suggest that p53 gene mutation could be a prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients.

Proliferative activity of esophageal carcinomas and their lymph node metastases: comparison using argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region staining

BACKGROUND

Many reports have concluded that quantification of the argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) measures proliferative activity and is a prognostic indicator in malignant disease. This retrospective study set out to evaluate the relationship between the AgNORs of the primary tumors and those of lymph node metastases in esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

Using a one-step silver staining technique, AgNORs were counted in surgical specimens from 54 patients with squamous cell carcinomas.

RESULTS

The AgNOR scores of the lymph nodes metastases were significantly lower than those of the primary tumor (P = 0.0001). In 53 of 54 cases (98%), the AgNOR scores in the nodal metastases were lower than those of the primary tumor. The survival of 22 patients with AgNOR scores > or =4.0 for the primary tumor was significantly less than that of 32 patients with AgNOR scores <4.0 for the primary tumor (P = 0.0014).

CONCLUSIONS

The AgNOR score of the lymph node metastases had no prognostic significance. The AgNOR score of esophageal primary cancer reflects the prognosis of patients. Scores for lymph node metastases were lower and did not reflect prognosis. The lower score in the lymph node metastases may result from the antitumor activity of macrophages in the lymph nodes.

Induction chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Induction chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy may provide results superior to those of single-modality treatment in patients with esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with this approach for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

From 1988 to 1996, 166 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer were evaluated; 66 entered a protocol of chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, cisplatin) concurrent with radiation (45 Gy) followed by esophagectomy. Fifty-four patients completed the protocol.

RESULTS

Toxicity associated with induction chemoradiotherapy was minimal. The actuarial survival at 12, 24, and 36 months was 59%, 42%, and 32%, respectively. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 41%, with 12-, 24-, and 36-month survivals of 77%, 50%, and 45%, whereas non-pCR patients had survivals of 46%, 35%, and 23%. The difference in survival between pCR and non-pCR patients was not significant (p = 0.13), but the difference in recurrence-free survival was significant (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

This well-tolerated protocol resulted in a high pCR. Trimodality treatment for esophageal cancer may provide long-term survival in some patients regardless of their pCR status.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil/low-dose leucovorin for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Forty-four patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were treated with biochemical modulated combination chemotherapy and surgery. Treatment consisted of cisplatinum (70 mg/m2/day 1, day 22), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 700 mg/m2/day, days 1-5, 22-26), and leucovorin (20 mg/m2/day, days 1-5, 22-26) with nutritional support, and surgery (days 42-70, mean day 56). Surgery consisted of subtotal esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or additional irradiation to the mediastinum was restricted to patient with residual tumors. Clinical response rate was 63.6% in primary tumor, 52.6% in intramural metastasis, 100% in intraepithelial spread, and 30.9% for metastatic lymph nodes. There was a slight disagreement between the result of evaluation of histological and clinical effect. The incidence of postoperative complications was 25%, and the mortality rate was 2.3%. Overall 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year survival rates of the patients were 57%, 37.9%, 28.5%, and 28.5%, respectively. The median survival time was 14.7 months. Responders survived longer than nonresponders. The histological responders survived longer than clinical responders. The 4-year survival rate of patients without residual tumor after treatment was 75% in the superficial cases, 51% in the locoregional cases, and 50% in the widespread cases.

Phase II study of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. ONCOPAZ Cooperative Group, Spain

Cisplatin (P) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) have demonstrated activity for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Previous studies have shown that leucovorin (L) may potentiate the antitumoral activity of 5FU, so we tested the combination P-5FU-L in 31 patients with inoperable squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. Chemotherapy consisted of P 20 mg/m2 in 4 h, followed by L 200 mg/m2 in 2 h and 5FU 600 mg/m2 in 18 h. This schedule was repeated for 5 days every 4 weeks. The treatment plan included three courses of chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. The overall response rate was 58% (95% CI = 39-76%), with one complete remission (3%), and 61% of patients reported an improvement in dysphagia. Gastrointestinal toxicity was the main side effect: grade 3-4 mucositis appeared in 19% of patients, grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting in 13%, and grade 3-4 diarrhea in 6.5%. There was one toxic death caused by neutropenia and sepsis. Nineteen patients received local radiotherapy after chemotherapy, which increased the overall response rate to 63% (5% complete responses). Dysphagia improved in 75% of them. The median survival for all patients was 11 months. This study shows that sequential therapy with P-5FU-L and radiotherapy achieves a high response rate as well as adequate symptomatic relief in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer. The results justify further evaluation of P-5FU-L in patients with earlier-stage disease.

A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled studies suggest that a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing surgery alone with combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery.

METHODS

Patients assigned to multimodal therapy received two courses of chemotherapy in weeks 1 and 6 (fluorouracil, 15 mg per kilogram of body weight daily for five days, and cisplatin, 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area on day 7) and a course of radiotherapy (40 Gy, administered in 15 fractions over a three-week period, beginning concurrently with the first course of chemotherapy), followed by surgery. The patients assigned to surgery had no preoperative therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients assigned to multimodal therapy and the 55 assigned to surgery, 10 and 1, respectively, were withdrawn for protocol violations. At the time of surgery, 23 of 55 patients (42 percent) treated with preoperative multimodal therapy who could be evaluated had positive nodes or metastases, as compared with 45 of the 55 patients (82 percent) who underwent surgery alone (P<0.001). Thirteen of the 52 patients (25 percent) who underwent surgery after multimodal therapy had complete responses as determined pathologically. The median survival of patients assigned to multimodal therapy was 16 months, as compared with 11 months for those assigned to surgery alone (P=0.01). At one, two, and three years, 52, 37, and 32 percent, respectively, of patients assigned to multimodal therapy were alive, as compared with 44, 26, and 6 percent of those assigned to surgery, with the survival advantage favoring multimodal therapy reaching significance at three years (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal treatment is superior to surgery alone for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Chemotherapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: a comparison of evidence from meta-analyses of randomized trials and of historical control studies

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy (CT) has been used as an adjunct to local treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) in esophageal carcinoma. A meta-analysis of all published randomized clinical trials and historical control studies which have used cisplatinum-based combination CT was carried out to asses the effect of chemotherapy on survival for esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A computer-based literature search was performed for the period from January 1988 to March 1995 using the index terms "Esophageal neoplasms' and "Chemotherapy'. The frame of reference was further narrowed to include only cisplatinum-based combination chemotherapy. Twelve randomized clinical trials (RCT) and eight historical control (HC) studies were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In the overview of HC studies a highly significant reduction in odds of death with CT was observed (68% +/- 8% OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.24-0.42). On the other hand, the overview of RCTs showed a relative reduction in odds of death for the CT group of 4.2% +/- 23.7% (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.75-1.22).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a gross overestimation of treatment effect in the studies using HC as compared to RCTs, despite the use of cisplatinum-based chemotherapy in both groups. The meta-analysis of RCTs reveal no significant survival benefit from cisplatinum-based adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Preoperative concomitant radiochemotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: results of a study of 56 patients

PURPOSE

Today the prognosis for patients with esophageal carcinoma still remains quite poor. In the last few years interesting results have been obtained by associating radio- and chemotherapy with or without surgery with this type of cancer. In this work we report the results of concomitant radio- and chemotherapy in a split-course schedule preceeding surgery for the treatment of squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-six patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus were treated between April 1989 and September 1993 in the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire in Brest, France with two courses of preoperative concomitant radiochemotherapy, separated by a 2-week interval, and followed by surgery (each course 18.5 Gy in five fractions, days 1-5 with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m2 days 1-5 and cisplatinum 70 mg/m2 day 2). Patients who had responded well to preoperative treatment (response > 50%) received four more courses of chemotherapy alone. The two patients who were not operated and those with palliative surgery received a third course of radiochemotherapy (radiotherapy 12 Gy in five fractions, days 1-5).

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were operated on. Twenty-one showed histological complete response at surgery (37.5% of the whole group). Actuarial survival for the 56 patients was 55% at 3 years and 30% at 4 years, with a median survival of 37.4 months (40.4 months for complete responders to preoperative treatment). Toxicity of preoperative concomitant radio-chemotherapy was low (5-FU had to be stopped in one patient because of cardiac rythm disturbances and in another patient because of aplasia Grade 4 associated with infection after the first course). Postoperative mortality was 11% (six patients).

CONCLUSION

This combination of preoperative radiochemotherapy followed by surgery seems to improve both response rates and survival in patients with esophageal cancer when compared with previous patients treated with surgery alone in our hospital or with results found in literature and it warrants further studies.

Incidence and distribution of distant metastases from newly diagnosed esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

It is important to diagnose distant metastases disease in patients with newly diagnosed esophageal carcinoma, so that unwarranted surgery and its attendant risks are avoided. The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the percentage of esophageal cancer patients with distant metastases (M1) at presentation, (2) the locations of these distant metastases, and (3) how the metastases were diagnosed.

METHODS

All patients at the University of Michigan Medical Center with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer between 1982 and July, 1993, were identified. Records for these 838 patients were reviewed, and patients were classified as having M0 or M1 disease at presentation. For patients with M1 disease, the locations of distant metastases and the methods of diagnosis were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven of 838 (18%) patients had M1 disease. In 110 of 147 (75%) patients, M1 disease was detected before surgery via imaging or physical examination, including 102 of 147 (69%) via chest or abdominal computed tomography (CT). In no case staged as M0 by abdominal and chest CT was M1 disease detected on bone scan or head CT. Distant metastases were most commonly diagnosed in abdominal lymph nodes (45%), followed by liver (35%), lung (20%), cervical/supraclavicular lymph nodes (18%), bone (9%), adrenal (5%), peritoneum (2%), brain (2%), and stomach, pancreas, pleura, skin/body wall, pericardium, and spleen (each 1%).

CONCLUSION

A significant percentage of patients with esophageal cancer have M1 disease at presentation. Imaging of the chest and abdomen is an effective method of screening such patients for M1 disease before treatment.

Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review

PURPOSE

To summarize the most current information about the etiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of esophagogastrostomy leaks following esophagectomy.

METHOD

The English language literature was searched by manual methods and MEDLINE for original articles reporting results and complications of esophagectomy.

RESULTS

Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks cause considerable morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy. Their major etiologic factors are ischemia of the gastric fundus and errors in surgical technique. The clinical presentation of postoperative anastomotic leak ranges from an asymptomatic radiographic finding to a necrotizing thoracic infection. Severity of illness is largely dependent on four factors: gastric viability, the site (thorax or neck) and time of the leak, and its containment by surrounding tissues. Cervical anastomoses have a higher leak rate than thoracic anastomoses, but leaks from thoracic anastomoses are more morbid.

CONCLUSION

Leaks from thoracic anastomoses require aggressive surgical treatment. Cervical anastomotic leaks that are truly confined to the neck can usually be managed at the bedside with wound drainage and packing. However, the seriousness of cervical anastomotic leaks should not be underestimated. Some leaks from anastomoses constructed in the neck are, in reality, mediastinal leaks. Selected patients with radiologically detected asymptomatic leaks can be managed conservatively.

Multimodality therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

Few reports exist detailing results of multimodality treatment for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. We have treated 28 such patients using a preoperative regimen consisting of two courses of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with radiation (either 3,000 or 3,600 cGy). There were 25 men and 3 women (mean age, 62.9 years; range, 35 to 86 years), and 16 patients were known to have Barrett's esophagus. Dysphagia was present for a mean of 2.7 months, and the average weight loss was 6.5 kg. Tumors ranged from 2 to 10 cm in length (mean, 5.2 +/- 1.8 cm) with American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I in 2 patients, stage II in 19 patients, and stage III in 7. Dysphagia improved in 23 patients (82%), and in 8 (29%) no tumor was detected during radiologic and endoscopic staging after neoadjuvant therapy. Four patients refused operation. Esophagectomy via standard Ivor Lewis approach was accomplished in 20 of 24 patients (87%) undergoing operation. There were no operative deaths, and mean hospital stay was 15.5 +/- 11.6 days. Four patients (17%) were complete responders with no tumor in the resected specimen. Actuarial survival in the 28 patients at 1, 2, and 3 years is 71%, 28%, and 20% respectively. Of the 20 esophagectomy patients, 6 are alive with no evidence of disease at 10, 50, 54, 70, 77, and 84 months. Three of these were complete responders. Only 1 of the 8 patients no undergoing resection is alive at 16 months with no evidence of disease after further radiotherapy and chemotherapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Intensive multimodality therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

BACKGROUND

We designed a trial of intensive multimodality therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction to assess tumor response and operability after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to determine the impact of trimodality therapy on longterm survival.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with resectable (clinical stage IIa, n = 17; IIb, n = 1; III, n = 14) squamous cell cancer (n = 15) or adenocarcinoma (n = 17) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leukovorin), resection, and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (hydroxyurea, 5-fluorouracil; 50-66 Gy).

RESULTS

Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy yielded the following results: a measurable clinical response in 22 patients, stable disease in eight patients, disease progression in one patient, and death in one patient. Thirty-one patients underwent resection, with the following results: two operative deaths (6.5%) and nonfatal morbidity in 17 (59%); the median hospital stay was 13 days. Pathologic staging was stage 0, n = 1; I, n = 2; IIa, n = 11; IIb, n = 5; III, n = 7; and IV, n = 5. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy was completed in 23 patients with one death, for an overall treatment-related mortality rate of 12.5% (four of 32). At a mean follow-up of 22.5 months, median survival is 19.7 months and 14 patients are alive and disease free.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant therapy for cancer of the esophagus and cardia results in good tumor response. Esophagectomy in this setting can be accomplished with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Results of an interim analysis of survival are encouraging and suggest that further investigation of this regimen is warranted.

Evolution of treatment strategies for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

Between 1980 and 1988, 91 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were treated by surgical resection and selective postoperative therapy. Operative mortality was 2%. Pathologic stage was I in 4, II in 26, and III in 61. Actuarial 2- and 5-year survival was 24% and 8%. From 1987 to 1989, 16 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were treated with two cycles of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin followed by surgical resection. There was 1 complete response (6%), 5 partial responses (31%), and 10 with no response (63%). Twelve patients had resection. Pathologic stage was I in 1, II in 4, and III in 8. There was one chemotherapy-related death and one surgical death. Actuarial 4-year survival is 42%. From 1990 to 1993, 22 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were treated with two cycles of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin followed by surgical resection. There was 1 complete response (5%), 11 partial responses (50%), and 10 with no response (45%). Eighteen patients had resection. Pathologic stage was 0 in 1, II in 8, and III in 9. There were no treatment-related deaths. The actuarial 2-year survival is 58%. Conclusions are necessarily limited because the patients were not treated in a randomized fashion. These preliminary results with preoperative chemotherapy appear improved (p = 0.04 and p = 0.004, respectively) as compared with results from 1980 to 1988 without preoperative chemotherapy.

The extent and number of metastatic lymph nodes limit the efficacy of lymphadenectomy in patients with oesophageal carcinoma

The extent and number of metastatic lymph nodes in 52 patients with oesophageal carcinoma involving more than one lymph node were analysed to determine the efficacy of lymphadenectomy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes, group A: 1-4 nodes (34 cases) and group B: 5 or more nodes (18 cases). The survival of all patients in group A was statistically better than that of the patients in group B (P = 0.02). In cases where metastatic nodes were restricted to one region, the survival of patients in group A was significantly better than that of patients in group B (P = 0.006). By contrast, in cases where metastatic nodes extended to two or more regions, there was no difference between the groups. The present study suggests that lymphadenectomy is effective only for patients with 1-4 metastatic nodes that are restricted to a single region. Lymphadenectomy is less efficacious in cases with five or more metastatic nodes, even when the nodes are restricted to one region, and is similarly ineffective in cases with metastatic nodes extending to two or more regions, regardless of the number of positive nodes.