The positive feedback action of vasopressin on its own release from rat septal tissue in vitro is receptor-mediated

The vasotocinergic system and its role in the regulation of stress in birds

The regulation of stress in birds includes a complex interaction of neural systems affecting the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. In addition to the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, a structure called the nucleus of the hippocampal commissure likewise affects the output of pituitary stress hormones and appears to be unique to avian species. Within the anterior pituitary, the avian V1a and V1b receptors were found in corticotropes. Based on our studies with central administration of hormones in the chicken, corticotropic releasing hormone (CRH) is a more potent ACTH secretagogue than arginine vasotocin (AVT). In contrast, when applied peripherally, AVT is more efficacious. Co-administration of AVT and CRH peripherally, resulted in a synergistic stimulation of corticosterone release. Data suggest receptor oligomerization as one possible mechanism. In birds, vasotocin receptors associated with stress responses include the V1a and V1b receptors. Three-dimensional, homology-based structural models of the avian V1aR were built to test agonists and antagonists for each receptor that were screened by molecular docking to map their binding sites on each receptor. Additionally, binding affinity values for each available peptide antagonist to the V1aR and V1bR were determined. An anterior pituitary primary culture system was developed to determine how effective each antagonist blocked the function of each receptor in culture when stimulated by a combination of AVT/CRH administration. Use of an antagonist in subsequent in vivo studies identified the V1aR in regulating food intake in birds. The V1aR was likewise found in circumventricular organs of the brain, suggesting a possible function in stress.

Comparing vasopressin and oxytocin fiber and receptor density patterns in the social behavior neural network: Implications for cross-system signaling

Vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OXT) regulate social behavior by binding to their canonical receptors, the vasopressin V1a receptor (V1aR) and oxytocin receptor (OTR), respectively. Recent studies suggest that these neuropeptides may also signal via each other's receptors. The extent to which such cross-system signaling occurs likely depends on anatomical overlap between AVP/OXT fibers and V1aR/OTR expression. By comparing AVP/OXT fiber densities with V1aR/OTR binding densities throughout the rat social behavior neural network (SBNN), we propose the potential for cross-system signaling in four regions: the medial amygdala (MeA), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNSTp), medial preoptic area, and periaqueductal grey. We also discuss possible implications of corresponding sex (higher in males versus females) and age (higher in adults versus juveniles) differences in AVP fiber and OTR binding densities in the MeA and BNSTp. Overall, this review reveals the need to unravel the consequences of potential cross-system signaling between AVP and OXT systems in the SBNN for the regulation of social behavior.

Conivaptan, a Selective Arginine Vasopressin V1a and V2 Receptor Antagonist Attenuates Global Cerebral Edema Following Experimental Cardiac Arrest via Perivascular Pool of Aquaporin-4

BACKGROUND

Cerebral edema is a major cause of mortality following cardiac arrest (CA) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Arginine vasopressin (AVP) and water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of CA-evoked cerebral edema. In this study, we examined if conivaptan, a V1a and V2 antagonist, attenuates cerebral edema following CA/CPR in wild type (WT) mice as well as mice with targeted disruption of the gene encoding α-syntrophin (α-syn(-/-)) that demonstrate diminished perivascular AQP4 pool.

METHODS

Isoflurane-anesthetized adult male WT C57Bl/6 and α-syn(-/-) mice were subjected to 8 min CA/CPR and treated with either bolus IV injection (0.15 or 0.3 mg/kg) followed by continuous infusion of conivaptan (0.15 mg/kg/day or 0.3 mg/kg/day), or vehicle infusion for 48 h. Serum osmolality, regional brain water content, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption were determined at the end of the experiment. Sham-operated mice in both strains served as controls.

RESULTS

Treatment with conivaptan elevated serum osmolality in a dose-dependent manner. In WT mice, conivaptan at 0.3 mg dose significantly attenuated regional water content in the caudoputamen (81.0 ± 0.5 vs. 82.5 ± 0.4% in controls; mean ± SEM) and cortex (78.8 ± 0.2 vs. 79.4 ± 0.2% in controls), while conivaptan at 0.15 mg was not effective. In α-syn(-/-) mice, conivaptan at 0.3 mg dose did not attenuate water content compared with controls. Conivaptan (0.3 mg/kg/day) attenuated post-CA BBB disruption at 48 h in WT mice but not in α-syn(-/-) mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous IV infusion of conivaptan attenuates cerebral edema and BBB disruption following CA. These effects of conivaptan that are dependent on the presence of perivascular pool of AQP4 appear be mediated via its dual effect on V1 and V2 receptors.

Treatment of stroke related refractory brain edema using mixed vasopressin antagonism: a case report and review of the literature

Background

Elevated intracranial pressure from cerebral edema is the major cause of early mortality in acute stroke. Current treatment strategies to limit cerebral edema are not particularly effective. Some novel anti-edema measures have shown promising early findings in experimental stroke models. Vasopressin antagonism in stroke is one such target which has shown some encouraging preliminary results. The aim of this report is to highlight the potential use of vasopressin antagonism to limit cerebral edema in patients after acute stroke.

Case presentation

A 57-year-old Caucasian man with new onset diplopia was diagnosed with vertebral artery aneurysm extending into the basilar circulation. He underwent successful elective vertebral artery angioplasty and coiling of the aneurysm. In the immediate post-operative period there was a decline in his neurological status and brain imaging revealed new midbrain and thalamic hemorrhage with surrounding significant brain edema. Treatment with conventional anti-edema therapy was initiated with no significant clinical response after which conivaptan; a mixed vasopressin antagonist was started. Clinical and radiological evaluation following drug administration showed rapid clinical improvement without identification of significant adverse effects.

Conclusions

The authors have successfully demonstrated the safety and efficacy of using mixed vasopressin antagonist in treatment of stroke related brain edema, thereby showing its promise as an alternative anti-edema agent. Preliminary findings from this study suggest mixed vasopressin antagonism may have significant utility in the management of cerebral edema arising from cerebrovascular accident. Larger prospective studies are warranted to explore the role of conivaptan in the treatment of brain edema and neuroprotection.

Increased complexity of vasopressin's vascular actions

Vasopressin is becoming a widely used pressor in conditions with severe hypotension. Like several other hormones important in cardiovascular and extracellular fluid control, however, vasopressin can activate several receptors that when pharmacologically or pathologically stimulated may result in conflicting effects. In the present issue of Critical Care, Rehberg and colleagues examined the hypothesis that blockade of vasopressin V2 receptor during septic shock may be beneficial. Their tantalizing results indicate that future work must consider the precise vasopressin receptors that are stimulated and/or inhibited.

Role of selective V2-receptor-antagonism in septic shock: a randomized, controlled, experimental study

Introduction

V₂-receptor (V₂R) stimulation potentially aggravates sepsis-induced vasodilation, fluid accumulation and microvascular thrombosis. Therefore, the present study was performed to determine the effects of a first-line therapy with the selective V₂R-antagonist (Propionyl₁-D-Tyr(Et)₂-Val₄-Abu₆-Arg_8,9)-Vasopressin on cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and organ function vs. the mixed V_1aR/V₂R-agonist arginine vasopressin (AVP) or placebo in an established ovine model of septic shock.

Methods

After the onset of septic shock, chronically instrumented sheep were randomly assigned to receive first-line treatment with the selective V₂R-antagonist (1 μg/kg per hour), AVP (0.05 μg/kg per hour), or normal saline (placebo, each n = 7). In all groups, open-label norepinephrine was additionally titrated up to 1 μg/kg per minute to maintain mean arterial pressure at 70 ± 5 mmHg, if necessary.

Results

Compared to AVP- and placebo-treated animals, the selective V₂R-antagonist stabilized cardiopulmonary hemodynamics (mean arterial and pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac index) as effectively and increased intravascular volume as suggested by higher cardiac filling pressures. Furthermore, left ventricular stroke work index was higher in the V₂R-antagonist group than in the AVP group. Notably, metabolic (pH, base excess, lactate concentrations), liver (transaminases, bilirubin) and renal (creatinine and blood urea nitrogen plasma levels, urinary output, creatinine clearance) dysfunctions were attenuated by the V₂R-antagonist when compared with AVP and placebo. The onset of septic shock was associated with an increase in AVP plasma levels as compared to baseline in all groups. Whereas AVP plasma levels remained constant in the placebo group, infusion of AVP increased AVP plasma levels up to 149 ± 21 pg/mL. Notably, treatment with the selective V₂R-antagonist led to a significant decrease of AVP plasma levels as compared to shock time (P < 0.001) and to both other groups (P < 0.05 vs. placebo; P < 0.001 vs. AVP). Immunohistochemical analyses of lung tissue revealed higher hemeoxygenase-1 (vs. placebo) and lower 3-nitrotyrosine concentrations (vs. AVP) in the V₂R-antagonist group. In addition, the selective V₂R-antagonist slightly prolonged survival (14 ± 1 hour) when compared to AVP (11 ± 1 hour, P = 0.007) and placebo (11 ± 1 hour, P = 0.025).

Conclusions

Selective V₂R-antagonism may represent an innovative therapeutic approach to attenuate multiple organ dysfunction in early septic shock.

Motivations and methods for analyzing pulsatile hormone secretion

Endocrine glands communicate with remote target cells via a mixture of continuous and intermittent signal exchange. Continuous signaling allows slowly varying control, whereas intermittency permits large rapid adjustments. The control systems that mediate such homeostatic corrections operate in a species-, gender-, age-, and context-selective fashion. Significant progress has been made in understanding mechanisms of adaptive interglandular signaling in vivo. Principal goals are to understand the physiological origins, significance, and mechanisms of pulsatile hormone secretion. Key analytical issues are: 1) to quantify the number, size, shape, and uniformity of pulses, nonpulsatile (basal) secretion, and elimination kinetics; 2) to evaluate regulation of the axis as a whole; and 3) to reconstruct dose-response interactions without disrupting hormone connections. This review will focus on the motivations driving and the methodologies used for such analyses.

Sex differences in plasma corticosterone release in undisturbed chickens (Gallus gallus) in response to arginine vasotocin and corticotropin releasing hormone

In birds, two neuropeptides, corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) and arginine vasotocin (AVT), are major regulators of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) during the stress response. In birds, however, the relative efficacy of CRH and AVT to stimulate the HPA axis in males and females remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the time course of CORT release following central CRH and AVT administration to male and female chickens. Chickens were fitted with a stainless steel cannula surgically implanted in the lateral ventricle and a catheter chronically inserted in the jugular vein. Birds were housed individually in cages behind a one-way glass partition and unnecessary noise was avoided during the sampling period. Each bird received a single 5.0microtracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of either saline (SAL), AVT (10 and 100pmol), or CRH (10 and 100pmol). Blood was sampled remotely every 15min for 2h and plasma CORT was determined by radioimmunoassay. There was a significant increase in plasma CORT concentration in males injected with 100pmol AVT beginning at 15min post-injection through 2h compared with SAL injected birds. In males, injection of 100pmol CRH was significantly more effective in releasing CORT compared to an equal molar concentration of AVT or SAL. In females, ICV injection of 100pmol AVT induced moderate increase in CORT levels. In contrast, 100pmol CRH significantly increased plasma CORT compared to SAL injected controls but the CORT response was nearly 50% less than that obtained in males.

Through V2, not V1 receptor relating to endogenous opiate peptides, arginine vasopressin in periaqueductal gray regulates antinociception in the rat

Our previous study has proven that central arginine vasopressin (AVP) plays an important role in antinociception, and pain stimulation raises AVP concentration in the periaqueductal gray (PAG). The nociceptive effect of AVP in PAG was investigated in the rat. The results showed that microinjection of AVP into PAG increased pain threshold, whereas microinjection of V2 receptor antagonist-d(CH2)5[d-Ile2, Ile4, Ala9-NH2]AVP into PAG decreased pain threshold in a dose-dependent manner, but local administration of V1 receptor antagonist-d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP did not change pain threshold; Pain stimulation elevated AVP, Leucine-enkephalin (L-Ek), Methionine-enkephalin (M-Ek) and beta-endorphin (beta-Ep), not dynorphinA(1-13) (DynA(1-13)) concentrations in PAG perfuse liquid; PAG pre-treatment with naloxone, an opiate receptor antagonist or V2 receptor antagonist completely reversed AVP-induced increase in pain threshold, however, PAG pre-treatment with V1 receptor antagonist did not influence this effect of AVP administration. The data suggest that AVP in the PAG, through V2 rather than V1 receptor, regulates antinociception, which progress relates to enkephalin and endorphin.

Through the central V2, not V1 receptors influencing the endogenous opiate peptide system, arginine vasopressin, not oxytocin in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus involves in the antinociception in the rat

Our previous study has proven that hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) played a role in the antinociception. The central bioactive substances involving in the PVN regulating antinociception were investigated in the rat. The results showed that electrical stimulation of the PVN increased the pain threshold, and L-glutamate sodium injection into the PVN elevated the pain threshold, but the PVN cauterization decreased the pain threshold; pain stimulation raised the arginine vasopressin (AVP), not oxytocin (OXT), leucine-enkephalin (L-Ek), beta-endorphin (beta-Ep) and DynorphinA1-13 (DynA1-13) concentrations in the PVN tissue using micropunch method, heightened AVP, L-Ek, beta-Ep and DynA1-13, not OXT concentrations in the PVN perfuse liquid, and reduced the number of AVP-, not OXT, L-Ek, beta-Ep and DynA1-13-immunoreactive neurons in the PVN especially in the posterior magnocellular part of the PVN using immunocytochemistry. There was a negative relationship between the PVN AVP concentration and the pain threshold; pain stimulation enhanced the AVP, not OXT mRNA expression in the PVN using in situ hybridization and RT-PCR; intraventricular injection of anti-AVP serum completely reversed L-glutamate sodium injection into the PVN-induced antinociception, and administration of naloxone - the opiate peptide antagonist, partly blocked this L-glutamate sodium effect, but anti-OXT serum pretreatment did not influence this L-glutamate sodium effect; L-glutamate sodium injection into the PVN-induced analgesia was inhibited by V2 receptor antagonist - d(CH2)5[D-Ile2, Ile4, Ala-NH2(9)]AVP, not V1 receptor antagonist - d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP. The data suggested that the PVN was limited to the central AVP, not OXT, which was through V2, not V1 receptors influencing the endogenous opiate peptide system, to regulate antinociception.

Centrally administered murine-leptin stimulates the hypothalamus-pituitary- adrenal axis through arginine-vasopressin

Starvation induces a decrease in circulating leptin levels and activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Leptin inhibits the HPA axis in unfed rodents or genetically leptin-deficient ob/ob mice, whereas it stimulates corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) gene expression in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN). However, the interactions between leptin, CRH and the HPA axis are poorly understood and are likely to be complex. We recently demonstrated that central leptin administration caused increases in plasma arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and AVP gene expression of the PVN in nonstressful rats. AVP stimulates the release of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), but it also potentiates the action of CRH on ACTH release. In this study, we investigated the effects of leptin on plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels, CRH mRNA of the PVN and proopiomelanocortin (POMC) mRNA of the pituitary in nonstrained rats. Intracerebroventricularly administered leptin caused increases in plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels in dose-dependent manners. In Northern blot analyses, the leptin injection induced significant increases in the expression of CRH mRNA in the PVN and POMC mRNA in the pituitary. The increased plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels by leptin were attenuated with intracerebroventricular pretreatment of a V(1a) receptor antagonist (OPC-21268) or a V(1a)/V(1b) receptor antagonist (dP[Tyr(Me)(2)]AVP), but not with that of a V(2) receptor antagonist (OPC-31260). The leptin-induced CRH mRNA expression in the PVN and POMC mRNA expression in the pituitary were also reduced by the pretreatment with OPC-21268 and dP[Tyr(Me)(2)]AVP. These results suggest that intracerebroventricular leptin administration activates the HPA axis by AVP receptor activation through V(1a) receptors in the PVN which in turn activates CRH neurons to drive ACTH and corticosterone secretion in concert with AVP in nonstrained rats.

Release of vasopressin within the brain contributes to neuroendocrine and behavioral regulation

In addition to its peripheral secretion from the neurohypophysis, the neuropeptide vasopressin (VP) is released within the mammalian brain from probably all parts of the neuronal membrane. In particular the development of brain microdialysis in vivo together with blood microdialysis or blood sampling provides the advantage of being able to reliably compare the dynamic release patterns into different compartments of the organism. The central VP release within hypothalamic (e.g., supraoptic, paraventricular and suprachiasmatic nuclei) and limbic (e.g., septum, amygdala) rat brain areas is stimulated by a variety of substances and stressors, including interleukin-1 beta, social defeat and forced swimming. Furthermore, it is characterized by positive and negative feedback mechanisms and the capacity of the VP system for co-ordinated or independent release, the latter being observed, for example, during social defeat. This emotional stressor, in contrast to exposure to a novel cage, increased VP release within the supraoptic nucleus, but not into plasma. This failure to release VP peripherally could be observed also during forced swimming, despite a dramatic rise in plasma osmolality and a markedly stimulated central release. In another series of experiments we studied the effects of centrally-released VP on cognitive and emotional aspects of behavior using reverse microdialysis for antagonist administration during the behavioral tests and antisense targeting to downregulate either VP or its local V1 receptor subtype. In this way, centrally (in particular septally) released VP could be shown to be causally involved in short-term memory and anxiety-related behavior. Furthermore, VP release within the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus is likely to provide a negative tonus on the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. This neuroendocrine effect together with cognitive, emotional and immunological effects of centrally released VP is thought to be essential to ensure adequate behavior of the animal during challenging situations and to contribute to the development of efficient coping strategies.

Vasopressin released within the septal brain area during swim stress modulates the behavioural stress response in rats

The aim of the present study was to investigate the physiological significance of the neuropeptide arginine vasopressin (AVP) released within the septum, in the behavioural response of rats to stress. In the first experiment, rats were chronically implanted with a microdialysis probe aimed at the mediolateral or ventral septum to monitor the local release of AVP in response to 10 min of forced swimming in 20 degrees C warm water. Exposure to this stressor caused a significant increase in AVP release in both the mediolateral (174 +/- 21%, P < 0.01) and ventral septum (220 +/- 33%, P < 0.01). In contrast, microdialysates collected outside the mediolateral septum or in the lateral ventricle remained at prestress levels throughout the dialysis period. Furthermore, unstressed control animals failed to show significant alterations in vasopressin release in the mediolateral septum. In a second experiment, the introduction of the V1 receptor antagonist d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP into the mediolateral septum via inverse microdialysis concomitant with stressor exposure caused the rats to spend an increased time floating and a reduced time swimming compared to vehicle-treated rats. This effect was acute and also detected 24 h after antagonist administration. Taken together, these findings demonstrate a significant activation of the septal vasopressinergic system in response to swim stress. Furthermore, our data support the view that AVP released within this brain area is involved in the generation of active behavioural strategies aimed at coping with new and challenging situations.

Differential modulation of lateral septal vasopressin receptor blockade in spatial learning, social recognition, and anxiety-related behaviors in rats

The role of lateral septal vasopressin (VP) in the modulation of spatial memory, social memory, and anxiety-related behavior was studied in adult, male Wistar rats. Animals were equipped with osmotic minipumps delivering the VP-antagonist d(CH2)5-D-Tyr(Et)VAVP (1 ng/0.5 microl per h) bilaterally into the lateral septum (LS). Subsequently, all rats were subjected to four behavioral tests. First, animals were tested in a spatial learning paradigm (Morris water maze; 12 trials), followed by the social recognition test. A possible role for VP in anxiety-related behavior was then studied in the shock-probe burying test and the elevated plus-maze, respectively. The results showed that VP receptor antagonism impaired social recognition and reduced open-arm activity in the plus-maze, while it had no effect on spatial learning (Morris maze) and shock-probe burying behavior. The results indicate a strong task-dependent specificity of lateral septal VP functioning.

GALR1 galanin receptor mRNA is co-expressed by galanin neurons but not cholinergic neurons in the rat basal forebrain

The neuropeptide galanin (GAL) has been proposed to be an inhibitory modulator of cholinergic transmission in the hippocampus and may impair memory by directly affecting the activity of basal forebrain (BF) cholinergic neurons. Alternatively, GAL may act indirectly and modulate the activity of other neurotransmitter systems which, in turn, influence cholinergic transmission. We have used double in situ hybridization histochemistry to evaluate the co-expression of the GAL receptor subtype, GALR1, within cholinergic neurons in the medial septum/diagonal band of adult male rats. In alternate brain sections, we assessed the co-expression of GALR1 mRNA within another forebrain cell group implicated in memory functions, the neurons of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) and medial amygdala (AMe) which co-express vasopressin (VP) and GAL and project to septo-hippocampus. Despite the abundance of GALR1 mRNA-expressing neurons in the cholinergic BF, we found no evidence for the co-expression of this receptor subtype within cholinergic neurons in the medial septum/diagonal band. In contrast, we detected an extensive co-expression (95%) of GALR1 mRNA within extrahypothalamic VP/GAL neurons. These results do not support the idea that GAL, acting via the GALR1 receptor, directly impairs BF cholinergic neurons but suggest, instead, that non-cholinergic neurons in the BF may play a role in mediating the inhibitory actions of GAL on cholinergic function. However, our findings provide anatomical evidence that GAL could directly modulate the activity and/or secretion pattern of extrahypothalmic VP/GAL neurons into septo-hippocampal regions.

Proconvulsive effect of vasopressin; mediation by a putative V2 receptor subtype in the central nervous system

Subcutaneously (s.c.) administered [Arg8]vasopressin (AVP) potentiated seizures induced by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of 1.95 mg pilocarpine (a muscarinic cholinergic agonist). A bell-shaped relation between dose and effect was found. I.c.v. pretreatment with a V1, V2 or oxytocin receptor antagonist was performed to determine whether and what type of receptor is involved in this proconvulsive effect of vasopressin. For these experiments a higher dose of pilocarpine (2.4 mg i.c.v.) was injected. This caused seizures in a slightly but not significantly higher percentage of the rats. A dose-dependent protective action of the V2 receptor antagonist d(CH2),[D-Ile2,Ile4]AVP (effective doses were 25 and 125 ng) on seizures was found. A reduction was observed in the number of animals that developed tonic-clonic convulsions. Neither the V1 receptor antagonist d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP nor the oxytocin receptor antagonist desGly(NH2)9d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2Thr4]OVT possessed anti-convulsive activity. Subsequently the type of receptor was studied in detail with fragments of AVP with either V1 or V2 activity. AVP (with V1 and V2 affinity) (1 and 3 microg s.c.) potentiated pilocarpine (1.95 mg) induced seizures. Vasotocin and oxytocin were without effect. Interestingly neither s.c. nor i.c.v. administration of the selective kidney type vasopressin receptor (V2) agonist dDAVP potentiated pilocarpine induced seizures. Several selective antidiuretic agonists (V2), such as d[Val4]AVP, d[Phe2,Val4,D-Arg8]vasopressin (3 microg), [Val4,D-Arg8]vasopressin (3 microg) and d[Val4,D-Arg8]vasopressin (3 microg) were active. Other selective antidiuretic compounds, such as [Val4]AVP, dAVP, d[Tyr(Me)2]AVP and HO[D-Arg8]vasopressin (3 microg) did not influence seizures. These results demonstrate that a combination of substitution of aminoacid 4 (Gln) by Val and to a lesser extent deamination and the D-arginine form yield an active molecule, which can potentiate pilocarpine induced seizures and suggest the existence of a V2 receptor subtype in the brain.

Interaction of vasopressin and angiotensin II in central control of blood pressure and thirst

It is now well recognized that systemically released angiotensin II (Ang II) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) act in concert in regulation of blood pressure and water-electrolyte balance. Numerous studies have also demonstrated that centrally applied Ang II and AVP cause significant alterations of the cardiovascular functions and body fluid balance. Moreover, it has been established that Ang II and AVP are released in the central nervous system during cardiovascular and osmotic disorders and that the cardiovascular regions of the brainstem and the osmoregulatory regions of the forebrain are extensively innervated by the angiotensinergic and vasopressinergic neurons. Some evidence indicates that the angiotensinergic and vasopressinergic system may interact in the central blood pressure control, although the significance of this interaction may differ in various species. Recently, attempts have been made to find out whether centrally released Ang II and AVP may play a role in the regulation of the cardiovascular system under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. With regard to this, the available evidence strongly suggests that the both systems may be involved in regulation of blood pressure under baseline conditions. In addition, the vasopressinergic system appears to be involved in the adjustment of cardiovascular functions to hypovolemia, whereas its role in regulation of blood pressure during the osmotic disorders is less clear. Regulation of blood pressure and heart rate by centrally released AVP under baseline conditions, during hypovolemia and in osmotic disorders is significantly altered in the spontaneously hypertensive rats. It is now well established that centrally applied Ang II and Ang III are potent dipsogenic compounds. There also is evidence that AVP may enhance the osmotic thirst. However, the physiological role of brain-derived AVP and Ang II in the control of water intake awaits further examination. The available evidence from rat studies does not give support to a significant cooperation between central angiotensinergic and vasopressinergic system in regulation of water intake.

Central vasopressin blockade enhances its peripheral release in response to peripheral osmotic stimulation in conscious rats

Increased plasma osmolality results in increased central as well as peripheral release of vasopressin. Experiments were carried out to determine whether, in this circumstance, vasopressin can act centrally to modulate its peripheral release. Prior to the start of a thirty-min i.v. infusion of 2.5 M or 0.15 M NaCl, the rats were given an intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of a peptide V1/V2 vasopressin antagonist (2 micrograms), OPC-31260 (60 micrograms), a non-peptide V2 antagonist, or 1-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (dDAVP, 5 ng), a V2 agonist. Experiments with the peptide antagonist were carried out in male and non-estrous female rats. Since there were no differences between males and females in the measured responses, experiments with the other two drugs were carried out only in males. Pretreatment with either the V1/V2 antagonist or the V2 antagonist enhanced the increase in plasma vasopressin levels in response to the hypertonic saline infusion by about 50% at the end of 30 min. dDAVP, on the other hand, had no effect. None of the i.c.v. drugs had an affect on either the pressor or bradycardic responses to hypertonic saline infusion. These observations suggest that vasopressin can act centrally in a negative feedback fashion to attenuate its own release into the peripheral circulation in response to increased plasma osmolality.

Evidence for regulatory mechanisms maintaining testosterone-dependent AVP concentrations in terminal regions

The dose and time relationships of testosterone treatment on arginine-vasopressin (AVP) concentrations of steroid-dependent vasopressinergic extrahypothalamic neurons were studied in the castrated male rat. The rate of AVP increase and the extent and limits of accumulation of AVP in the terminal regions were explored. Testosterone propionate (TP) treatment (0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 mg/kg SC given three times a week) started 15 weeks after castration. The periods of treatment lasted for 20, 40, and 80 days. AVP concentrations in the lateral septum (LS) and the lateral habenula (LH), determined by radioimmunoassay, increased dose and time dependently. A significant effect was achieved by 0.25 mg/kg and a maximum level obtained by 0.50 mg/kg after a 40-day period of treatment. The maximum concentration reached corresponded to the level of the intact animal. Increasing the dose or period of treatment did not raise the AVP concentration above that particular level. The data suggest regulatory mechanisms that maintain the AVP concentration in the terminal regions at a precastrational level.

Behavioral consequences of intracerebral vasopressin and oxytocin: focus on learning and memory

Since the pioneering work of David de Wied and his colleagues, the neuropeptides arginine vasopressin and oxytocin have been thought to play a pivotal role in behavioral regulation in general, and in learning and memory in particular. The present review focuses on the behavioral effects of intracerebral arginine vasopressin and oxytocin, with particular emphasis on the role of these neuropeptides as signals in interneuronal communication. We also discuss several methodological approaches that have been used to reveal the importance of these intracerebral neuropeptides as signals within signaling cascades. The literature suggests that arginine vasopressin improves, and oxytocin impairs, learning and memory. However, a critical analysis of the subject indicates the necessity for a revision of this generalized concept. We suggest that, depending on the behavioral test and the brain area under study, these endogenous neuropeptides are differentially involved in behavioral regulation; thus, generalizations derived from a single behavioral task should be avoided. In particular, recent studies on rodents indicate that socially relevant behaviors triggered by olfactory stimuli and paradigms in which the animals have to cope with an intense stressor (e.g., foot-shock motivated active or passive avoidance) are controlled by both arginine vasopressin and oxytocin released intracerebrally.

Vasopressin-induced sensitization: involvement of neurohypophyseal peptide receptors

Rats pretreated with an intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of 10 pmol of vasopressin or vasopressin analogs, including deamino-D-vasopressin, [pGlu4,Cyt6]vasopressin, [pGlu-Asn-Cys(Cys)]Pro-Leu-Gly-NH2, des-Gly-NH9(2)-vasopressin, Pro-Leu-Gly-NH2, Pro-Arg-Gly-NH2, became markedly hyper-responsive to the motor effects, 24 h later, to a subsequent challenge dose of vasopressin, but not vasopressin-related peptides. A vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist, [d(CH2)1(5),Tyr(Me)2]vasopressin, but not the vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, [d(CH2)1(5),Tyr(Et)2,Val4]vasopressin, or a more selective vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, [d(CH2)1(5),D-Ile2,Ile4]vasopressin, or the oxytocin receptor antagonist, [d(CH2)1(5),Tyr(Me)2,Thr4,Orn8,Tyr-NH9(2)]vasotocin ([d(CH2)1(5),Tyr(Me)2,Thr4,Tyr-NH9(2)]OVT), blocked vasopressin and vasopressin analog-induced sensitization. Furthermore, both vasopressin V2 receptor antagonists were found to sensitize the brain to a subsequent vasopressin injection. This vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist-induced sensitization was also blocked by the vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist. Next, we wanted to determine if this sensitization process could involve the release of endogenous vasopressin in the brain as reflected in an amplification of vasopressin mRNA expression. However pretreatment of rats with an i.c.v. vasopressin injection was not associated with an increase in vasopressin mRNA expression in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, medial amygdala or the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus when measured 0, 1, 3, 7, 12, or 24 h after the first vasopressin injection. As many vasopressin analogs can induce sensitization, we suggest that a novel type of receptor may be involved in the sensitization process.

Characterization of vasopressin receptors in cultured cells derived from the region of rat brain circumventricular organs

The aim of the present study was to characterize vasopressin receptors within the two circumventricular organs located in the lamina terminalis of the rat brain, namely the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis and the subfornical organ. Cells derived from both structures were isolated, cultured and intracellular Ca2+ concentrations were measured in single fura-2 loaded neurons and astrocytes after application of vasopressin and various vasopressin analogues. Subsequent to Ca2+ measurements, the identification of neurons and astrocytes was verified using immunocytochemistry with cell type-specific antibodies. High proportions of subfornical organ (34%) and organum vasculosum laminae terminalis (28%) neurons exhibited increased intracellular Ca2+ concentration after exposure to 1-1000 nM vasopressin. Within single cells, the response was dose-dependent. Similar results were obtained in subfornical organ (62%) and organum vasculosum laminae terminalis (38%) astrocytes with minor differences in the transient amplitude and pattern distribution when compared with neurons. Since omission of extracellular Ca2+ preserved vasopressin responsiveness, it is likely that intracellular stores were the main source of mobilized Ca2+. The preincubation of neurons and astrocytes with the V1 receptor-specific antagonist d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]8-arginine vasopressin (10-100 nM) selectively and reversibly blocked the vasopressin-mediated response. Oxytocin-induced Ca2+ transients (0.32-1000 nM), which were observed in 32% (63%) or organum vasculosum laminae terminalis and in 54% (42%) of subfornical organ neurons (astrocytes), were not affected by the V1-specific antagonist. These data indicate the presence of a V1-like vasopressin receptor and an oxytocin receptor in cultured neurons and astrocytes from both circumventricular organ structures. In addition, the exposure to the highly selective V2 receptor agonist, 1-desamino,8-D-arginine vasopressin, evoked Ca2+ transients almost exclusively in organum vasculosum laminae terminalis neurons (eight of 18 tested). Only 1 (n = 14) subfornical organ neuron and none of the astrocytes tested (n = 26) responded to 1-desamino,8-D-arginine vasopressin. Since 1-desamino,8-D-arginine vasopressin acting via "classical" V2 receptors is not expected to affect the intracellular Ca2+ concentration, these data indicate the tissue and cell type-specific expression of a 1-desamino,8-D-arginine vasopressin-sensitive vasopressin receptor in neurons of the organum vasculosum laminae terminalis. In summary, the results indicate a heterogeneity of neurohypophyseal peptide receptor subtypes in the primary cell culture of both circumventricular structures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Hemorrhage-induced vasopressin release in the paraventricular nucleus measured by in vivo microdialysis

Experiments were carried out, using the technique of in vivo microdialysis in conscious rats, to determine whether hemorrhage, a potent stimulus for the release of vasopressin from the posterior pituitary into the circulation, would also result in a local release of vasopressin from the paraventricular nucleus (PVN), and whether this release is affected by gender. Male and non-estrous female rats were prepared with a microdialysis probe adjacent to the PVN and femoral arterial and venous catheters the day before the experiment. On the day of the experiment, rats was bled either 20% or 30% of blood volume. The concentration of vasopressin in the dialysate increased significantly in the males following both hemorrhages and in the females following the 30% hemorrhage. There were no statistically significant differences in the post-hemorrhage dialysate vasopressin concentration with respect to either gender or magnitude of the hemorrhage. The plasma vasopressin concentration increased markedly in response to the hemorrhage and this response was greater in females following the 30% hemorrhage. There were no gender differences in the reduction in arterial pressure following either hemorrhage. It is concluded that physiological stimuli for the release of vasopressin into the circulation also result in intrahypothalamic release of this hormone.

Simultaneous monitoring of intracerebral release and behavior: endogenous vasopressin improves social recognition

We previously reported that direct osmotic stimulation of the supraoptic nucleus (SON) of rats via a microdialysis probe produces a robust 'rebound' release of endogenous vasopressin (AVP) into the extracellular fluid of this hypothalamic nucleus. We now demonstrate in a combined microdialysis and push-pull perfusion study that this intranuclear release is accompanied by increased AVP release in the septum. Simultaneous monitoring of intranuclear release and behavioral performance in the same animal indicated a significant correlation between the amount of endogenously released AVP and improved social memory based on the olfactory discriminative capacities of adult male rats. This memory improvement was partially blocked by local administration of a AVP V1 receptor antagonist either into the SON or septum. These findings indicate that direct osmotic stimulation of the supraoptic nucleus, which increases intracerebral vasopressin release, improves the acquisition and/or processing of olfactory stimuli. Thus, the endogenous neuropeptide fulfills one of the major criteria for being causally involved as a neurotransmitter/neuromodulator in behavioral performance.

Facilitatory effect of vasopressin on the ischemic decrease of the CA1 presynaptic fiber spikes in rat hippocampal slices

We investigated the effects of vasopressin-related neuropeptides on the hypoxia/hypoglycemia (ischemia)-induced decrease of the CA1 presynaptic potential elicited by stimulation of Schaffer collaterals in rat hippocampal slices. Treatment with arginine-vasopressin (AVP) potentiated the ischemic decrease of the CA1 presynaptic potential. In contrast, a V1 receptor antagonist produced a dose-dependent neuroprotective effect, whereas a V2 receptor antagonist had no effect. The AVP-induced decrease of the CA1 presynaptic potential was completely blocked by simultaneous application of the V1 receptor antagonist. Because AVP4-9 is regarded as the major proteolytic product of AVP in the rat brain, we examined its effect on the ischemic decrease of the CA1 presynaptic potential. Treatment with AVP4-9 produced a more marked reduction of the potential than treatment with AVP itself. The present study demonstrates that stimulation of the V1 receptor has a detrimental effect on the development of ischemic damage whereas V1 receptor blockade has a neuroprotective effect, suggesting that AVP may potentiate ischemic neuronal deficits via V1 receptor stimulation.

Osmotic stimulation of the supraoptic nucleus: central and peripheral vasopressin release and blood pressure

Experiments were performed to determine the effect of direct osmotic stimulation of the supraoptic nucleus (SON) on central and peripheral vasopressin (AVP) release and arterial pressure. A microdialysis method was used to deliver hyperosmotic NaCl, mannitol or urea bilaterally into the SON and to sample SON extracellular fluid and blood. Simultaneous brain and blood microdialysis showed that hyperosmotic NaCl increased central and peripheral AVP release and increased mean arterial pressure (MAP). The pressor response was not blocked by intravenous injection of a V1-receptor antagonist, D(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP, suggesting that circulating AVP was not involved in that response. Hyperosmotic mannitol or urea caused an increase in central peptide release, but failed to affect MAP or peripheral AVP release. The results suggest that central AVP release within the SON may be due to osmoreceptor stimulation while the peripheral effects on AVP release and MAP are specific for sodium. The results also demonstrate the utility of brain and blood microdialysis for the delivery of stimuli into specific brain regions with simultaneous monitoring of central and peripheral peptide release.

Microdialysis administration of vasopressin into the septum improves social recognition in Brattleboro rats

The role of septal arginine vasopressin (AVP) in a social recognition test was investigated in both homozygous Brattleboro (HO-DI) and normal Long-Evans rats. To do this, the duration of investigation of conspecific juveniles by untreated adult males of both rat strains was measured before and after inter exposure intervals of 30 and 120 min. Additionally, a microdialysis administration technique was used to administer synthetic AVP (0.2 or 2.0 ng) or its V1 receptor antagonist d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP (5.0 ng) into the mediolateral septum concomitantly with the behavioral test. Untreated HO-DI rats showed an impaired social recognition compared with untreated Long-Evans rats. A similarly impaired performance was observed after V1 receptor antagonist treatment of Long-Evans rats. Microdialysis administration of synthetic AVP, on the other hand, significantly improved social recognition in both rat strains. The data suggest that endogenous AVP in the septal brain area is critically involved in the acquisition, storage, and/or recall of olfactory cues in rats.

Effects of central vasopressin administration to infant rats

The neurohypophyseal peptide hormone arginine-vasopressin functions as a neuropeptide in several brain areas in addition to its role as a posterior pituitary hormone. Several studies indicate that arginine-vasopressin and arginine-vasopressin receptors appear early in the infant rat brain. To determine if arginine-vasopressin receptors in the infant were responsive to exogenous peptides, we compared the behavioral effects of central or peripheral administration of arginine-vasopressin, arginine vasotocin, the oxytocin precursor oxytocin-Gly-Lys-Arg, and arginine-vasopressin receptor antagonists in socially isolated rat pups. Central administration of arginine-vasopressin decreased the number of rat pup ultrasonic vocalizations, reduced locomotor activity and decreased the latency to express a response to negative geotaxis. Temperature was also reduced at all doses tested. Co-administration of arginine-vasopressin and receptor antagonists suggested that changes in vocal behavior were mediated by the V1 receptor subtype. Changes in core temperature appeared to be mediated by a V2 receptor subtype. Peripheral arginine-vasopressin administration increased calling and decreased core body temperature. Neither effect was blocked by central receptor antagonist administration. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that arginine-vasopressin receptors in the infant rat brain are functional.

Vasopressin-induction of cyclic AMP in cultured hippocampal neurons

We investigated the influence of AVP on the induction of the second messenger cyclic AMP (cAMP) during early hippocampal neuron development using cultured hippocampal neurons. Results of those studies revealed that in cultured hippocampal neurons AVP-induces the formation of the second messenger cyclic AMP (cAMP). AVP-induction of cAMP is dose dependent and displays an inverted-U shaped function. Maximal AVP-induction of cAMP accumulation occurred following 15 min of exposure. Results of peptide specificity studies indicated that the vasopressin receptor expressed in cultured hippocampal neurons is pharmacologically promiscuous in that vasopressin metabolite peptides, oxytocin, a V2 receptor agonist and antagonist can all induce the formation of cAMP. In marked contrast, [Phe2,Ile3,Orn8]-vasopressin, a V1 receptor agonist, did not induce cAMP formation. The expression of the cAMP-linked AVP receptor is transient with maximal functional expression occurring between 3 and 4 days in culture which recedes by the fifth day in culture. Because the peptide specificity of the cAMP-linked neural AVP receptor is unique, relative to all other AVP receptors studied thus far, we suggest the term V2b receptor to indicate the distinction of a third (3) type of AVP receptor which is expressed during development (D) of hippocampal nerve cells.

Vasopressin-induced motor effects: localization of a sensitive site in the amygdala

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) induces motor effects when administered into the cerebral ventricles, the ventral septal area (VSA), or the vestibular cerebellum of the rat brain. Because AVP-like immunoreactivity and AVP-binding sites exist in the central medial amygdala (cmeA), and because the amygdala can be kindled to produce motor effects, we hypothesized that the amygdala might play a role in AVP-induced motor effects. This hypothesis was tested by observing motor behavior in response to injection of AVP into the central medial region of the amygdala. Our results demonstrate that an initial injection of AVP into the cmeA caused minor motor effects, including immobility, prostration and ataxia, whereas a similar injection, given 24 h later, caused severe motor effects including barrel rotations and myoclonic/myotonic-like convulsive behavior. A potential receptor basis for the AVP-induced motor and sensitization effects in the cmeA was investigated using AVP analogues. A V1 antagonist, d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP, blocked both the motor and sensitization effects produced by cmeA AVP injection. A V2 receptor agonist, DDAVP, did not affect motor activity upon cmeA injection, but did, however, sensitize animals to subsequent cmeA AVP injection. These results suggest that the cmeA is a sensitive site for AVP-induced motor effects and that these motor effects are sensitized by prior exposure to AVP. While the motor effects observed after cmeA AVP injection are mediated via AVP receptors that resemble the V1 type, the sensitization effect may be mediated via multiple receptor systems.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Microdialysis administration of vasopressin and vasopressin antagonists into the septum during pole-jumping behavior in rats

Wistar rats (n = 95) were trained in a pole-jumping apparatus (10 trials/session/day) to investigate the involvement of centrally and peripherally released endogenous AVP in their acquisition rate and to examine the feasibility of the microdialysis technique for the administration of peptides during a behavioral test. After session 1, a microdialysis probe was implanted into the septum; during sessions 2 and 3 the probe was perfused with artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) alone or containing either AVP (delivered amount via the probe: 0.2 ng) or the V1 (d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP, 5.0 ng) or the V2/V1 (d(CH2)5-D-Tyr(Et)VAVP, 5.0 ng) antagonist. Administration of AVP via microdialysis into the septum failed to alter the acquisition rate of pole jumping. Also, ip application of both hypertonic saline and the AVP V1 antagonist (10 micrograms) in another experiment failed to show a significant effect upon behavior. Septal administration of the V1 or the V2/V1 antagonist via microdialysis, however, produced a significantly impaired performance. The results indicate that AVP release within the septum is involved in the acquisition of pole-jumping behavior probably mediated by the V1 receptor subtype. An additional involvement of the V2 receptor subtype, however, cannot be entirely excluded. The microdialysis technique proved to be a potent tool to administer substances concomitantly with behavioral tests.

Vasopressin release within the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei of the rat brain: osmotic stimulation via microdialysis

The combination of microdialysis and a highly sensitive radioimmunoassay was used in order to monitor the in vivo release of arginine vasopressin (AVP) within hypothalamic supraoptic (SON) and paraventricular (PVN) nuclei of the rat brain. A dialysis probe was inserted into the SON or PVN area and microdialysis was performed in conscious or urethane-anesthetized animals before, during and after hypertonic artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF, with 1 M NaCl) was delivered via the probe. The recovery of AVP in vitro was 1.60%, that of [3H]OH in vitro 14.2% and in vivo 8.44% (SON) and 9.26% (PVN), respectively. AVP was consistently detected in both SON and PVN dialysates; basal levels averaged 0.87 +/- 0.22 pg/30-min dialysate (SON, n = 51) and 0.80 +/- 0.24 pg/30-min dialysate (PVN, n = 6), respectively. Hypertonic aCSF given over a period of 30 min, 60 min or 90 min, resulted in an increased AVP release within the SON which, however, reached its peak (to 8.86-10.27 pg/sample; P less than 0.001 as compared to basal) only in the poststimulation period, i.e. after replacement of hypertonic with isotonic aCSF. An identical osmotic stimulus given 150-210 min after the first one produced similar, though slightly declined, changes in AVP release. In the PVN, AVP release patterns prior to and in response to the first hypertonic pulse were similar to those in the SON; a possible functional difference between the two nuclei is indicated by the lack of a rebound increase in AVP release following the second stimulation. The physiological significance of intranuclearly released AVP remains to be shown.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)