Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of dibromodulcitol (DBD, NSC-104800) in man. I. Metabolites of DBD

The biological activity of cisplatin and dibromodulcitol in combination therapy

The efficacy and modes of action of dibromodulcitol (DBD) and cisplatin (CDDP) were studied in several model systems. Combination treatments produced a longer survival time in mice bearing P388 solid lymphomas than either of the drugs alone. In the human metastatic melanoma HT-168 xenograft model the combined application of DBD and CDDP was also very effective, inducing a reduction in the number and volume of metastatic nodules. For V79 spheroids, DBD was mainly cytotoxic against the internal, quiescent cells, whereas cisplatin primarily killed cells in the proliferating, external regions of the spheroids. When combined, the drugs appeared to act synergistically throughout the spheroids. Studies on plasmid DNA showed that CDDP primarily generates cross-links, whereas single-strand breaks were dominant after DBD treatment. Upon using an assay for cleavage by restriction nuclease, antagonistic action of DBD and CDDP in combination may occur, nevertheless more strand breaks were always observed in these samples. These results suggest that the efficacy of combined DBD and CDDP is in part a result of 'spatial cooperation' by the drugs (i.e. affecting different cells) and in part the result of DNA damage produced by the combination treatments.

Treatment of malignant scala posterior brain tumors in children: the chemotherapy of relapsed medulloblastoma with a dibromdulcitol containing drug regime and pharmacokinetic studies of dibromdulcitol in children

Dibromdulcitol (Elobromol) has favorable pharmacokinetic parameters for the treatment of brain tumors: high spinal fluid/plasma ratio and long half-life in spinal fluid. Oral application makes its administration easy. The drug combination vincristine, procarbazine, and dibromdulcitol proved to be effective in a pilot trial on relapsed medulloblastomas: 8 complete and 4 partial remissions were achieved from 16 cases. The main side effect was granulocytopenia, which was in some cases severe. However, in the dose-schedule we used it did not delay the treatment longer than 1 week.

The distribution of bromine content of dibromodulcitol in the central nervous system of patients with malignant gliomas

The bromine content of human gliomas and white matter was determined by neutron activation analysis (NAA) following p.o. administration of a single dose of 400-500 mg/m2 dibromodulcitol (DBD). In another group of patients with brain gliomas, the bromine content was measured subsequent to application of a single dose of 334 mg/m2 of sodium bromide (equivalent dose regarding the bromine content of DBD). The bromine content of these two groups was compared to the values found in a third control group of untreated patients. The amount of bromine after DBD application was three to four times higher than in the untreated samples and the average accumulation ratio of 1.8 +/- 0.4 proved to be nearly identical both in tumour and white matter. The bromine values after NaBr treatment showed a different pattern of distribution. The accumulation was higher in the tumour tissue than in the normal white matter. These findings demonstrate that the pharmacokinetic properties of DBD- and NaBr-derived bromine are different, suggesting that the increase of bromine after DBD administration could be due to covalently bound bromine in DBD.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of dianhydrogalactitol DAG in patients: a comparison with the human disposition of dibromodulcitol DBD

Dianhydrogalactitol (DAG), labelled with 3H, was administered in single intravenous or oral doses to six patients (three in each group) with cancer. Kinetic parameters were calculated for the unchanged DAG and its biotransformation products. Elimination of the drug by metabolism and excretion was described by a catenary model. In order to elucidate the role of DAG as a mediator of the alkylating action of the cytostatic drug dibromodulcitol (DBD), the pharmacokinetic parameters of DAG and DBD were compared. The mean residence time for pharmacologically active molecules in the body was six times shorter for DAG (1.9 hr) than for DBD (11.4 hr). Alkylating action and metabolic degradation proceeded about 8-9 times faster for DAG than for DBD. The process of DBD alkylation implies a slow solvolytic conversion of the parent drug into the more reactive bromoepoxide and DAG. The preformed DAG would be rapidly consumed by intracellular alkylation and degradation, while unchanged DBD could form a depot in the cells and exert its cytostatic activity through the epoxides released in situ by solvolytic activation. Thus DBD entering the cells in unchanged form may have a more important role in its therapeutic effects than had been assumed earlier.

Rat liver-mediated degradation of dibromodulcitol

The rate and extent of dibromodulcitol (DBD) conversion by 9000 g rat liver supernatant with an NADPH-generating system (S-9 mix) were studied using 3H-labelled drug. Results indicated that S-9 mix seemed to exert an initial protective effect delaying the solvolysis of DBD for about 30 min at 37 degrees C followed by rapid degradation into exclusively pharmacologically inactive products. Thus S-9 mix contained merely DBD as an effective agent; it amounted to less than 40% of the total radioactive compounds by 120 min. In the control mixtures the sovolytically produced effective drug content, i.e. the sum of DBD, 1,2-anhydro-6-bromo-6-deoxygalactitol (BrEpG), 1,2-5,6-dianhydrogalactitol (DAG) was 63%. Our results suggest the involvement of liver enzymes in the detoxification of DBD into inactive products. Therefore the antitumour effect of DBD cannot be attributed to its active BrEpG and DAG alone. The drug in its unchanged form may contribute to a somewhat greater extent to its cytostatic action than was believed before.

The distribution of [3H]-dibromodulcitol in the central nervous system of patients with brain tumour

The uptake of [3H]-dibromodulcitol ( [3H]-DBD) into glioblastomas, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid was studied in 10 patients. Single-tissue samples were taken from different subjects at 4, 15 and 24 hr after [3H]-DBD administration. The level of 3H-compounds in the central nervous system was similar after a single (400 mg/m2), or 3 smaller daily oral doses of 150-180 mg/m2 of [3H]-DBD. The distribution of radioactivity was uniform in the tumour, white matter and muscle. Between 3 and 15 hr after administration of DBD the concentration of radioactivity did not change significantly and was between 5 and 13 micrograms of DBD/g tissue wet wt. At the same time the level in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) remained between 1 and 4 micrograms/ml. Meanwhile, the average concentration of radioactivity in the plasma fell from 11 to 3 micrograms/ml. The elimination half-life of the labelled compounds from the tissues was about 1 day as judged from the limited number of non-serial data obtained 4 and 24 hr after the last dose of repeated drug administration.

Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of dibromodulcitol (DBD, NSC-104800) in man--II. pharmacokinetics of DBD

Dibromodulcitol (DBD), labelled with [3H] at position C-1, was administered orally to 6 patients in a single dose of 15 mg/kg. Kinetic parameters were calculated for the effective drug (DBD + BrEpG + DAG), protein-bound hexitol moieties and free metabolites. Approximate values were estimated for the oral bioavailability of DBD. Disposal of the drug by metabolism and excretion was described by a simplified catenary model. The results indicated that 8-20% of the drug became firmly bound to macromolecules, probably by alkylation. The slow rate of alkylation in vivo (half-life 14 hr) may imply conversion of DBD into epoxides and their alkylating interaction with the target nucleophiles. The long retention of the firmly bound hexitol moieties in the body may be an indicator of the cumulative potency of DBD and must be taken into consideration by developing dosage schedules.

Toxicity, antitumour and haematological effects of 1,2-anhydro-6-bromogalactitol and d-mannitol: a comparison with the related dibromo- and dianhydro-derivatives

1,2-Anhydro-6-bromo-6-deoxygalactitol (BrEpG) and its D-mannitol analogue (BrEpM) intermediary metabolites in the conversion of dibromodulcitol (DBD) and dibromomannitol (DBM) into dianhydrogalactitol (DAG) and dianhydromannitol (DAM) have been prepared. The three types of derivative of each hexitol have been compared in their toxicities towards mice, tumour inhibitory activities against the Walker carcinosarcoma and haematological effects in rats. The bromoepoxides showed intermediate potency in all tests. The galactitol derivatives were always more potent than their mannitol counterparts. The mannitol derivatives were selectively myelosuppressive, being twice as toxic towards granulocytes as towards lymphocytes. The lymphotoxic activity of DBM, in particular, relative to its other toxic effects was particularly mild. These differences have been ascribed principally to the more rapid reactivity of DAG compared with DAM towards target nucleophiles, modulated by the influence of the bromine substituent on the transport properties of the dibromo- and bromoepoxy-derivatives.

Clinical trials with the hexitol derivatives in the U.S

Three hexitol derivatives, dibromomannitol (DBM), dibromodulcitol (DBD), and dianhydrogalactitol (DAG), originally investigated in Hungary, have been evaluated as anticancer agents in the United States. Their principal mechanism of action is attributed to alkylation via actual or derived epoxide groups. Their preclinical spectrum includes activity against murine leukemias and against the murine ependymoblastoma, which is particularly noteworthy for DAG. Dibromomannitol trials were targeted to chronic myelogenous leukemia but no advantage over busulfan therapy was demonstrable. Dibromodulcitol and DAG were sequentially evaluated for their usefulness against a wide variety of tumors. The activity of DBD against breast cancer has stimulated several continuing trials in this disease. On the other hand, DAG was disappointing in breast cancer and in several other malignancies, but some activity has been noted against lung cancer. Both DBD and DAG are being investigated for possible usefulness in the management of patients with intracranial neoplasms. The present clinical experience does not allow firm judgment on the advantage of one analogue over another. Such comparative analysis does point out the desirable direction of future studies as well as the limitations of current preclinical systems for the selection of analogues.