Inhibition of resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure by pharyngeal water stimulation in humans

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of acotiamide in patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial

BACKGROUND

We have determined that the impaired accommodation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) underlies the pathogenesis of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO). We have also found that acotiamide may treat EGJOO by improving impaired LES accommodation. The effects of acotiamide in patients with EGJOO need to be further confirmed in a prospective study.

METHODS

This trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of acotiamide (300 mg/day or 600 mg/day) with those of a placebo in the treatment of patients with EGJOO. The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients who report an improvement in symptom of food sticking in the chest after 4 weeks of treatment period 1. The secondary endpoints will be the proportion of patients with normalized integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), the value of change from baseline in the distal contractile integral, basal LES pressure, EGJOO-quality of life score, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and the correlation between IRP and each symptom score. During the 2-year trial period, 42 patients from five institutions will be enrolled.

DISCUSSION

This trial will provide evidence to clarify the efficacy and safety of acotiamide as a treatment for patients with EGJOO. Acotiamide might help improve the quality of life of patients with EGJOO and is expected to prevent the progression of EGJOO to achalasia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Kyushu University Hospital as well as the local IRBs of the participating sites for clinical trials and registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT: 2071210072). The registration date is on October 11, 2021.

The treatment effects of acotiamide in esophagogastric outflow obstruction: a prospective longitudinal observational study

OBJECTIVES

We have found that an altered lower esophageal sphincter (LES) accommodation response is an underlying cause of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO). The objective of this study was to examine the treatment effect of acotiamide, a prokinetic agent which improves impaired gastric accommodation in functional dyspepsia, in patients with EGJOO.

METHODS

A prospective observational longitudinal study was conducted between October 2014 and March 2020. Acotiamide (100 mg, 3 times a day) was administered to 25 patients with EGJOO for 4 weeks. High-resolution manometry (HRM) was performed just before and after 4 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

As the primary outcome, the extent of integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) after treatment (14.6, 12.1-22.0 mmHg) was significantly lower than that before treatment (19.4, 17.1-27.4 mmHg). The extent of LES accommodation index after treatment (32.7, 21.0-40.0 mmHg) was also significantly lower than that before treatment (39.3, 31.2-50.2 mmHg). Acotiamide normalized the IRP (< 15 mmHg) in 13 of 25 patients with EGJOO (52%), and the IRP was decreased in 20 of 25 patients with EGJOO (80%). As the secondary outcome, the total FSSG score in 25 patients with EGJOO before and after acotiamide treatment showed no significant difference. In a sub-analysis of 13 patients in whom EGJOO was normalized by acotiamide, however, dysphagia was reported to be significantly improved by acotiamide.

CONCLUSIONS

Acotiamide has a treatment effect on patients with EGJOO via a reduction in the IRP level through the lowering of both the basal LES pressure and LES accommodation response. Dysphagia is a key symptom to be evaluated and treated in patients with EGJOO.

Physiological and pathological roles of the accommodation response in lower esophageal sphincter relaxation during wet swallows

The preparatory accommodation response of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) before swallowing is one of the mechanisms involved in LES relaxation during wet swallows, however, the physiological and/or pathological roles of LES accommodation remain to be determined in humans. To address this problem, we conducted a prospective observational study of 38 patients with normal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and 23 patients with idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) to assess dry and wet swallows. The LES accommodation measurement was proposed for practical use in evaluating the LES accommodation response. Although swallow-induced LES relaxation was observed in both dry and wet swallows, LES accommodation (6.4, 3.1–11.1 mmHg) was only observed in wet swallows. The extent of LES accommodation was impaired in idiopathic EGJOO (0.6, − 0.6–6 mmHg), and the LES accommodation measurement of patients with idiopathic EGJOO (36.8, 29.5–44.3 mmHg) was significantly higher in comparison to those with normal HRM (23.8, 18–28.6 mmHg). Successful LES relaxation in wet swallowing can be achieved by LES accommodation in combination with swallow-induced LES relaxation. Impaired LES accommodation is characteristic of idiopathic EGJOO. In addition to the IRP value, the LES accommodation measurement may be useful for evaluating the LES relaxation function in clinical practice.

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Response to Laryngeal Adductor Reflex Elicitation in Humans

OBJECTIVE

The laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) is an important mechanism to secure the airways from potential foreign body aspiration. An involvement of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) in terms of a laryngo-UES contractile reflex has been identified after laryngeal mucosa stimulation. However, the LAR-UES relationship has not yet been fully explained. This study aimed to determine the magnitude, latency, and occurrence rate of the UES pressure response when the LAR is triggered in order to elucidate the functional relationship between the larynx and the UES.

METHODS

This prospective study included seven healthy volunteers (5 female, 2 male, age 22-34 years). Laryngeal penetration was simulated by eliciting the LAR 20 times in each individual by applying water-based microdroplets onto the laryngeal mucosa. UES pressures were measured simultaneously using high-resolution manometry.

RESULTS

Two distinct pressure phases (P1, P2) associated with the LAR were identified. P1 corresponded with a short-term UES pressure decrease in two subjects and a pressure increase in five subjects occurring 200 to 500 ms after the stimulus. In P2, all subjects experienced an increase in UES pressure with a latency time of approximately 800 to 1700 ms and an average of 40 to 90 mmHg above the UES resting tone.

CONCLUSION

Foreign bodies penetrating the laryngeal inlet lead to a reflex contraction of the UES. Phase P1 could be a result of vocal fold activity caused by the LAR, leading to pressure changes in the UES. The constriction during P2 could strengthen the barrier function of the UES in preparation to a subsequent cough that may be triggered to clear the airways.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1778-E1784, 2021.

Response to multiple rapid swallows shows impaired inhibitory pathways in distal esophageal spasm patients with and without concomitant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction

Distal esophageal spasm (DES) is a motility disorder characterized by premature contraction of the esophageal body during single swallows. It is thought to be due to impairment of esophageal inhibitory pathways, but studies to support this are limited. The normal response to multiple rapid swallows (MRS) is deglutitive inhibition of the esophageal body during the MRS sequence. Our aim was to compare the response to MRS in DES patients and healthy control subjects. Response to MRS during HRM was evaluated in 19 DES patients (8 with and 11 without concomitant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction [EGJOO]) and 24 asymptomatic healthy controls. Patients with prior gastroesophageal surgery, peroral endoscopic myotomy, pneumatic dilation, esophageal botulinum toxin injection within 6 months of HRM, opioid medication use, and esophageal stricture were excluded. Response to MRS was evaluated for complete versus impaired inhibition (esophageal body contractility with distal contractile integral [DCI] > 100 mmHg-sec-cm during MRS), presence of post-MRS contraction augmentation (DCI post MRS greater than single swallow mean DCI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Impaired deglutitive inhibition during MRS was significantly more frequent in DES compared to controls (89% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), and frequency was similar for DES with versus without concomitant EGJOO (100% vs. 82%, P = 0.48). The proportion of subjects with augmentation post MRS was similar for both groups (37% vs. 38%, P = 1.00), but mean DCI post MRS was higher in DES than controls (3360.0 vs. 1238.9, P = 0.009). IRP was lower during MRS compared to single swallows in all patients, and IRP during MRS was normal in 5 of 8 patients with DES and EGJOO. Our study suggests that impaired deglutitive inhibition during MRS is present in the majority of patients with DES regardless of whether they have concomitant EGJOO, and future studies should explore the usefulness of incorporating response to MRS in the diagnosis of DES.

Pressure measurement in the upper esophagus during cricoid pressure: A high-resolution solid-state manometry study

BACKGROUND

The use of cricoid pressure is controversial, and its ability to occlude the esophagus has been questioned. In this study, high-resolution solid-state manometry was used to analyze pressure changes in the upper esophagus from cricoid pressure during modified rapid sequence induction. This is a secondary analysis of data from a previous study.

METHODS

Seventeen healthy volunteers participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study with primary aim to compare differences in the barrier pressure on the lower esophageal sphincter during rapid sequence induction with or without alfentanil. Standardized cricoid pressure of 30 N was applied 2 minutes after propolipid injection and held for 15 seconds and pressures in the esophagus were measured.

RESULTS

Cricoid pressure resulted in a pressure increase of 127 ± 98 mmHg (95% CI: 73-182) (placebo) and 123 ± 74 mmHg (95% CI: 84-162) (alfentanil) at the level of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES), compared to baseline. The pressure difference around the UES compared to the proximal esophagus during cricoid pressure application was 165 ± 100 mmHg (placebo) and 159 ± 87 mmHg (alfentanil) (mean ± 1 SD).

CONCLUSION

This study using high-resolution solid-state manometry under clinically relevant conditions shows that 30 N cricoid pressure generates high pressure in the area of the UES, far exceeding the levels previously considered necessary to prevent regurgitation. Additional studies are needed to clarify the effectiveness of cricoid pressure in preventing passive regurgitation before it is rejected as a part of rapid sequence induction.

Measuring movement and location of the gastroesophageal junction: research and clinical implications

Understanding the physiology of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) is important as failure of its function is associated with reflux disease, hiatus hernia, and cancer. In recent years, there have been impressive developments in high resolution technologies allowing measurement of luminal pressure, pH, and impedance. One obvious deficiency is the lack of technique to monitor the movement and location of the GEJ over a prolonged period of time. Proximal movement of the GEJ during peristalsis and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) is due to shortening of the longitudinal muscle of the esophagus. Techniques for measuring shortening include fluoroscopic imaging of mucosal clip, high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound, and high resolution manometry, but these techniques have limitations. Short segment reflux is recently found to be more common than traditional reflux and may account for the high prevalence of intestinal metaplasia and cancer seen at GEJ. While high resolution pHmetry is available, there is no technique that can reliably and continuously measure the position of the squamocolumnar junction. A new technique is recently reported allowing a precise and continuous measurement of the GEJ based on the principle of Hall effect. Reported studies have validated its accuracy both on the bench and against the gold standard, fluoroscopy. It has been used alongside high resolution manometry in studying the behavior of the GEJ during TLESRs and swallows. While there are challenges associated with this new technique, there are promising ongoing developments. There is exciting time ahead in research and clinical applications for this new technique.

A novel pattern of longitudinal muscle contraction with subthreshold pharyngeal stimulus: a possible mechanism of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation

A subthreshold pharyngeal stimulus induces lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation and inhibits progression of ongoing peristaltic contraction in the esophagus. Recent studies show that longitudinal muscle contraction of the esophagus may play a role in LES relaxation. Our goal was to determine whether a subthreshold pharyngeal stimulus induces contraction of the longitudinal muscle of the esophagus and to determine the nature of this contraction. Studies were conducted in 16 healthy subjects. High resolution manometry (HRM) recorded pressures, and high frequency intraluminal ultrasound (HFIUS) images recorded longitudinal muscle contraction at various locations in the esophagus. Subthreshold pharyngeal stimulation was induced by injection of minute amounts of water in the pharynx. A subthreshold pharyngeal stimulus induced strong contraction and caudal descent of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) along with relaxation of the LES. HFIUS identified longitudinal muscle contraction of the proximal (3-5 cm below the UES) but not the distal esophagus. Pharyngeal stimulus, following a dry swallow, blocked the progression of dry swallow-induced peristalsis; this was also associated with UES contraction and descent along with the contraction of longitudinal muscle of the proximal esophagus. We identify a unique pattern of longitudinal muscle contraction of the proximal esophagus in response to subthreshold pharyngeal stimulus, which we propose may be responsible for relaxation of the distal esophagus and LES through the stretch sensitive activation of myenteric inhibitory motor neurons.

High-resolution solid-state manometry of the effect of rocuronium on barrierpressure

BACKGROUND

The pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) is partly dependent on striated muscles derived from the crural portion of the diaphragm. The effect of neuromuscular blockade on the integrity of the esophagogastric junction is not well studied. We conducted a prospective interventional study to determine the effect of rocuronium on the barrier pressure (LES pressure - intragastric pressure) of the esophagogastric junction. We also studied the effect of positive pressure ventilation on the barrier pressure after neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium.

METHODS

Fourteen patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists classification system (ASA) I or II (aged 18-75 years) who presented for elective surgery (11 cholecystectomy, 3 inguinal hernia) participated in the study. Esophageal manometry was performed during anesthetization with propofol, fentanyl, and sevoflurane. The LES pressure was studied prior to anesthesia, after anesthesia induction during spontaneous breathing with laryngeal mask airway, after administration of rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), and during positive pressure ventilation.

RESULTS

Muscle relaxation with rocuronium showed no significant changes in barrier pressure when comparing the pressure immediately before rocuronium administration with the pressure obtained after rocuronium administration at the time point of 0% train-of-four (TOF). Conversion to positive pressure ventilation did not change the barrier pressure with inspiration or expiration. The greatest decrease in barrier pressure was measured after inducing anesthesia when comparing pressures during inspiration (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium and conversion from spontaneous breathing to positive pressure ventilation does not decrease the barrier pressure during anesthesia induction.

Differential activation of pontomedullary nuclei by acid perfusion of different regions of the esophagus

The objective of this study was to determine the brain stem nuclei and physiological responses activated by esophageal acidification. The effects of perfusion of the cervical (ESOc), or thoracic (ESOt) esophagus with PBS or HCl on c-fos immunoreactivity of the brain stem or on physiological variables, and the effects of vagotomy were examined in anesthetized cats. We found that acidification of the ESOc increased the number of c-fos positive neurons in the area postrema (AP), vestibular nucleus (VN), parabrachial nucleus (PBN), nucleus ambiguus (NA), dorsal motor nucleus (DMN), and all subnuclei of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), but one. Acidification of the ESOt activated neurons in the central (CE), caudal (CD), dorsomedial (DM), dorsolateral (DL), ventromedial (VM) subnuclei of NTS, and the DMN. Vagotomy blocked all c-fos responses to acid perfusion of the whole esophagus (ESOw). Perfusion of the ESOc or ESOt with PBS activated secondary peristalsis (2P), but had no effect on blood pressure, heart rate, or respiratory rate. Perfusion of the ESOc, but not ESOt, with HCl activated pharyngeal swallowing (PS), profuse salivation, or physiological correlates of emesis. Vagotomy blocked all physiological effects of ESOw perfusion. We conclude that acidification of the ESOc and ESOt activate different sets of pontomedullary nuclei and different physiological responses. The NTSce, NTScom, NTSdm, and DMN are associated with activation of 2P, the NTSim and NTSis, are associated with activation of PS, and the AP, VN, and PBN are associated with activation of emesis and perhaps nausea. All responses to esophageal fluid perfusion or acidification are mediated by the vagus nerves.

Terminating motor events for TLESR are influenced by the presence and distribution of refluxate

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) is frequently associated with reflux events and terminates with a primary or secondary peristaltic wave. However, it is unclear whether the presence and properties of the refluxate affect TLESR-termination events. The aims of this study were to determine the pattern of terminating esophageal motor activity after TLESR in healthy subjects and factors affecting the type of terminating motor event. Fifteen healthy subjects (7 men, age 18-56) were studied. High-resolution manometry and impedance/pH monitoring were performed simultaneously in supine position for 2 h after subjects took a 1,000-kcal meal (Awake Study). This procedure was repeated during the night under polysomnographic recording for 6-8 h after consuming a 1,000-kcal meal (Sleep Study). We categorized three types of TLESR-terminating motor events, primary peristalsis (PP), full secondary contraction (FSC), which propagated the entire esophagus, and partial secondary contractions (PSC), which started distal to the upper esophageal sphincter. Overall, 289 TLESR events were found. The percentages of TLESR events terminated by PP, FSC, and PSC were 22%, 14%, and 64%, respectively. TLESR events terminated by PP were less likely to be accompanied by reflux events. TLESR events terminated by FSC were significantly more likely to have evidence for proximal esophageal reflux and esophago-pharyngeal reflux. Findings were similar in awake and sleep states. We concluded that, in healthy recumbent subjects, the most common TLESR-termination event is a secondary contraction, rather than PP. Presence and distribution of the refluxate is a major influence on the type of terminating contraction.

Brain stem control of the phases of swallowing

The phases of swallowing are controlled by central pattern-generating circuitry of the brain stem and peripheral reflexes. The oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal phases of swallowing are independent of each other. Although central pattern generators of the brain stem control the timing of these phases, the peripheral manifestation of these phases depends on sensory feedback through reflexes of the pharynx and esophagus. The dependence of the esophageal phase of swallowing on peripheral feedback explains its absence during failed swallows. Reflexes that initiate the pharyngeal phase of swallowing also inhibit the esophageal phase which ensures the appropriate timing of its occurrence to provide efficient bolus transport and which prevents the occurrence of multiple esophageal peristaltic events. These inhibitory reflexes are probably partly responsible for deglutitive inhibition. Three separate sets of brain stem nuclei mediate the oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal phases of swallowing. The trigeminal nucleus and reticular formation probably contain the oral phase pattern-generating neural circuitry. The nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) probably contains the second-order sensory neurons as well as the pattern-generating circuitry of both the pharyngeal and esophageal phases of swallowing, whereas the nucleus ambiguus and dorsal motor nucleus contain the motor neurons of the pharyngeal and esophageal phases of swallowing. The ventromedial nucleus of the NTS may govern the coupling of the pharyngeal phase to the esophageal phase of swallowing.

The gastro-oesophageal common cavity revisited

The manometric common cavity phenomenon has been used as indicator of gastro-oesophageal reflux of liquid or gaseous substances. Using combined pH and impedance recording as reference standard the value of a common cavity as indicator of gastro-oesophageal reflux was tested. Ten healthy male subjects underwent combined stationary pressure, pH and impedance recording for 4.5 h. After 1.15 h of recording, a reflux-eliciting meal was consumed. The chi-squared and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used for the statistical analysis. A common cavity was found in 95 (43%) of the 223 reflux events detected by impedance, while seven common cavities were unrelated to a reflux episode. In 54% of the reflux events detected by impedance without a common cavity, a possible common cavity was obscured by either contractile activity or artefacts of various origin. The types of reflux associated with a common cavity (liquid 60%, mixed 31%, gas 9%) and without a common cavity (liquid 59%, mixed 29%, gas 12%) did not differ, or did the acidity of the reflux episodes (with common cavity: acid 67%; without common cavity: acid 58%). The common cavity is a specific but not a sensitive marker of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Furthermore, common cavities are not specific for a particular type of reflux.

Effect of dietary sodium chloride on gastro-oesophageal reflux: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

It has been suggested that a high consumption of sodium chloride (NaCl) is associated with reflux symptoms. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of increased dietary NaCl intake on gastro-oesophageal reflux and reflux mechanisms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study 10 healthy male subjects received 5 g NaCl or placebo in capsules per day for one week, after which concurrent manometric, pH and impedance monitoring was carried out for 4.5 h.

RESULTS

Oesophageal acid exposure time (pH < 4) was similar for placebo (median 11% (25th 3-75th 36)) and NaCl (9% (1-36)). No differences in the numbers of reflux episodes were found for NaCl (16 (13.5-22)) and placebo (23 (14.8-27)). Furthermore, similar numbers of liquid acid reflux episodes (placebo 12 (6.5-17.3); NaCl 10 (2.3-14.3)), liquid weakly acidic reflux episodes (placebo 5.5 (4-12.3); NaCl 6.5 (3-10.8)) and gaseous reflux episodes (placebo 1 (0-1.8); NaCl 2 (0-3)) were seen. In both conditions transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs) were the most common reflux mechanism, followed by swallow-induced reflux. High salt intake lowered LOS pressure overall and in the first postprandial hour (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

High dietary sodium intake does not increase gastro-oesophageal reflux in healthy volunteers, despite a decrease in LOS pressure.

Differential activation of medullary vagal nuclei during different phases of swallowing in the cat

The aim of this study was to identify the medullary vagal nuclei involved in the different phases of swallowing activated physiologically in a species with an esophagus similar to human. In decerebrate cats, the pharyngeal (0.5-1.0 ml water in pharynx (N=6)) or esophageal (1-3 ml air in esophagus (N=5)) phases of swallowing were stimulated separately once per minute for 3 h, and we compared the resulting c-fos immunoreactivity within neuronal cell nuclei of the dorsal motor nucleus (DMN), nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) and nucleus ambiguus (NA) with a sham control group (N=5). We found that the pharyngeal phase was associated with an elevated number of c-fos positive neurons in the intermediate (NTSim), interstitial (NTSis), ventromedial (NTSvm) subnuclei of the NTS, caudal DMN, and dorsal NA; and the esophageal phase was associated with an elevated number of c-fos positive neurons in the central (NTSce), ventral, dorsolateral, ventrolateral subnuclei of the NTS, rostral DMN, and ventral NA. We concluded that the pharyngeal and esophageal phases of swallowing are associated with different sets of NTS subnuculei; and the DMN and NA may contain functionally different populations of motor neurons situated rostrocaudally and dorsoventrally associated with the different phases of swallowing. The central pattern generator (CPG) for swallowing probably receives significant peripheral feedback, and the NTSvm may participate in the transition of the pharyngeal to the esophageal phase of swallowing.

Laryngo-upper esophageal sphincter contractile reflex in humans deteriorates with age

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Recent studies have shown the existence of several reflex connections between the aerodigestive and upper gastrointestinal tracts. Our aim was to study the effect of laryngeal stimulation on upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure and to determine the reproducibility of this effect.

METHODS

We studied 14 young and 10 elderly healthy nonsmoker volunteers and 7 patients with UES dysphagia using a concurrent manometric and video endoscopic technique. Three levels of laryngeal air stimulation were studied: 6 mm Hg/50 ms, 10 mm Hg/50 ms, and 6 mm Hg/2 s. Ten young subjects were studied twice.

RESULTS

For 6-mm Hg/2-s and 6-mm Hg/50-ms duration stimuli, the frequency of UES response to air stimulation as evidenced by mucosal deflection (response/deflection ratio) in the elderly volunteers was significantly lower compared with that of young subjects (P < 0.05). The response/deflection ratio of the 6-mm Hg/2-s stimulus was significantly higher than those induced by stimuli of shorter duration (P < 0.01). Poststimulation UES pressure was significantly higher than prestimulation pressure (P < 0.05) in both groups. The magnitude of the increase in poststimulation UES pressure in the elderly volunteers was similar to that of the young subjects. Findings were similar in repeated studies. Four of 7 dysphagic patients exhibited an abnormal response.

CONCLUSIONS

Afferent signals originating from the larynx reproducibly induce contraction of the UES: the laryngo-UES contractile reflex. This reflex is elicited most reliably by 6-mm Hg/2-s air stimulation. Frequency elicitation of this reflex decreases significantly with age while the magnitude of change in UES pressure remains unchanged, indicating a deleterious effect of aging on the afferent arm of this reflex. This reflex is altered in some dysphagic patients.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and baclofen: is there a light at the end of the tunnel?

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are rapid and prolonged relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) that are not associated with swallowing. They are the mechanism by which most gastroesophageal reflux episodes occur in normal people and in patients with esophagitis. Transient LES relaxations appear to be mediated by a vagovagal reflex initiated by gastric distention. Baclofen is a g-aminobutyric acid (GABA) derivative that inhibits the production of TLESRs by acting as a GABA(B) receptor agonist at one or more loci along the vagovagal reflex arc. Animal and human studies suggest that baclofen decreases the number of reflux events and amount of esophageal acid exposure. Baclofen or another GABA(B) receptor agonist may be clinically useful in treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Normal physiology of the aerodigestive tract and its effect on the upper gut

There is a close functional relation between the aerodigestive tract and the upper gastrointestinal tract. The pharynx and larynx are involved in respiration, speech, and deglutition. This article reviews the effects of reflexes emanating from the pharynx and larynx on the esophagus and its sphincters, as well as the effects of reflexes emanating from the esophagus on the larynx. Principally, reciprocal reflexes within these 2 regions result in protection of the airway against aspiration from above and below, either by swallowed or refluxed material. However, other reflexes appear to facilitate reflux of gastric content into the esophagus and inhibit esophageal motor function.

Ineffective motility is not a marker for gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have suggested that ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) may be a marker for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), particularly supraesophageal reflux disease. We evaluated the relationship between esophageal acid exposure and esophageal body motility in patients undergoing both esophageal manometry and 24-h pH metry in the absence of antisecretory therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective database review of 84 patients (mean age 47 yr, 46% male) evaluated in our GI physiology laboratory. The indication for testing was recorded and characterized as esophageal or supraesophageal. Abnormal esophageal acid exposure was defined as a distal esophageal pH <4 for more than 4.2% of the total monitoring time (>6.3% upright, >1.2% supine) or a proximal esophageal acid exposure time of greater than 1.1% total (>1.3% upright, 0% supine). IEM was defined as more than two of 10 ineffective peristaltic waves.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients had esophageal-presenting symptoms, and 12 had supraesophageal symptoms. The prevalence of abnormal esophageal acid exposure was similar in patients with esophageal and supraesophageal symptoms (69% vs 92%, p = 0.17). Abnormal motility was identified in 26 patients (31%). IEM was the most common motility disturbance (77%, 20 patients). The frequency of motility disorders was similar in patients with and without abnormal esophageal acid exposure (30% vs 35%, p = 0.79), in patients with esophageal or supraesophageal symptoms (32% vs 25%, p = 0.75, for all patients; 30% vs 27%, p = 1.00, for patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure), and among upright, supine, and combined refluxers (33%, 9%, and 35%, p = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

IEM does not stand alone as a significant marker for the presence of GERD in general or supraesophageal reflux disease in particular.

Patterns of esophageal inhibition during swallowing, pharyngeal stimulation, and transient LES relaxation. Lower esophageal sphincter

Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation and esophageal body inhibition co-occur during esophageal peristalsis but not necessarily during pharyngeal stimulation or transient LES relaxation (tLESR). This study examined these relationships and the impact on reflux. Nine young volunteers were studied. An artificial high-pressure zone (HPZ) was established, and pH was recorded 8 and 5 cm proximal to the LES. Pharyngeal stimulation was by water injection and gastric distension with liquid or gas. Peristalsis, pharyngeal stimulation, and spontaneous events were recorded. Swallowing relaxed the LES in 100% of trials (the HPZ in 80%) and caused no reflux. Pharyngeal stimulation relaxed the LES in two-thirds of trials, had no effect on the HPZ, and caused no reflux. Gastric distension was associated with 117 tLESRs, 48% with acid reflux, and 32% with gas reflux; there was no effect on the HPZ. We conclude that LES relaxation is a necessary but not sufficient condition for reflux. LES relaxation and esophageal body inhibition are independent events that may be concurrent (swallowing) or dissociated (tLESR).

Peripheral mechanisms affecting the lower esophageal sphincter tone

LES tone is influenced by central and peripheral mechanisms. Peripheral factors influencing the LES tone include inhibitory reflexes originating from the stomach, esophagus, pharynx, and larynx. Although the role of LES relaxation and its associated reflux events induced by gastric distention has been extensively studied, the LES relaxations triggered by stimulation of the aerodigestive tract have only recently been the focus of systematic investigation and have resulted in documentation of the intricate reflex relationship between the upper gastrointestinal tract and the aerodigestive tract.

Resting esophageal sphincter pressures and deglutition frequency in awake subjects after oropharyngeal topical anesthesia and laryngeal mask device insertion

We investigated the effects of oropharyngeal topical anesthesia and placement of the standard (LMA) and the ProSeal (PLMA) laryngeal mask airway on resting gastroesophageal barrier pressure (GEBP), upper esophageal sphincter pressure (UESP), and deglutition frequency in awake subjects. Each subject was studied on 2 consecutive days: 1 day with the LMA and the other with the PLMA, in random order. GEBP and UESP were measured between deglutitions by using a pull-through technique in five sequential conditions: 1) after acclimatization to the manometer, 2) after topical anesthesia, 3) after the LMA or PLMA was self-inserted and the cuff inflated with either 10 or 30 mL of air in random order, 4) after the cuff volume was adjusted to the other randomized volume, and 5) after LMA or PLMA removal. Deglutition frequency was determined between pressure measurements by using a neck microphone. UESP was always larger than GEBP (P < 0.001 for all). Topical anesthesia had no influence on GEBP, UESP, or deglutition frequency. LMA and PLMA placement did not influence GEBP or UESP, but deglutition frequency was higher (P < 0.02 for all). GEBP and UESP did not vary between devices for any condition. Cuff volume did not influence GEBP or UESP. Deglutition frequency was more frequent for the LMA than the PLMA at a 30-mL cuff volume (P = 0.008). We conclude that resting GEBP and UESP are unaffected by oropharyngeal topical anesthesia and the LMA or PLMA in awake subjects, but that deglutition frequency is increased by the LMA or PLMA. This may have implications for the incidence of regurgitation in these situations.

IMPLICATIONS

Resting gastroesophageal barrier pressure and upper esophageal sphincter pressure are unaffected by oropharyngeal topical anesthesia and laryngeal mask devices in awake subjects, but deglutition frequency is increased by laryngeal mask devices. This may have implications for the incidence of regurgitation in these situations.

Prolonged recording of oesophageal and lower oesophageal sphincter pressure using a portable water-perfused manometric system

The aim of our study was to investigate the recording fidelity of a water-perfused micromanometric catheter with incorporated sleeve combined with a newly developed portable water-perfused manometric system for pharyngeal, oesophageal and lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure recording. The system's performance was assessed in prolonged recordings in ambulant gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) patients. Eighty 24-h studies in GORD patients, carried out with the perfused portable manometric system, were evaluated. Twelve of these recordings were analysed in detail in order to compare oesophageal and LOS motor patterns with those described previously. Paired 2-h manometric recordings of the pharynx, oesophagus, LOS and stomach, using the new system and a conventional perfused stationary manometric system, were performed in eight healthy subjects. With the portable manometric system oesophageal contractions, transient LOS relaxations, swallow-associated prolonged LOS relaxations and LOS pressures were recorded with equal fidelity to the conventional manometric system. Recordings obtained with the portable system showed meal-related and diurnal variations in oesophageal and LOS variables that were similar to these found in studies using conventional equipment. The new manometric system, consisting of a perfused micromanometric catheter with incorporated sleeve and a portable perfusion system, enables prolonged studies on oesophageal and LOS motor patterns in ambulant subjects.

Deterioration of the pharyngo-UES contractile reflex in the elderly

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Deterioration of aerodigestive tract reflexes such as the esophagoglottal and pharyngoglottal closure reflexes and pharyngeal swallow has been documented in the elderly. However, the effect of aging on the contractile response of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) to pharyngeal water stimulation has not been studied. The aim of this study was to characterize the pharyngo-UES reflex in the healthy elderly.

METHODS

We studied nine healthy elderly (77 +/- 1 y [SD]; four men, five women) and nine healthy young volunteers (26 +/- 2 y [SD]; four men, five women). AUES sleeve sensor was used to measure the pressure. We tested pharyngeal stimulation induced by rapid pulse and slow continuous injection of water.

RESULTS

The volume of water required to stimulate the pharyngo-UES contractile reflex by rapid pulse injection in the elderly (0.5 +/- 34 0.1 mL) was significantly higher than that in the young (0.1 +/- 0.02 mL) (P < .05). In contrast to young subjects, there was no pressure increase in resting UES pressure observed in the elderly for continuous pharyngeal water infusion. In both young and elderly, the threshold volume for the pharyngo-UES contractile reflex was significantly lower than that for pharyngeal swallows.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharyngo-UES contractile reflex deteriorates with aging. This deterioration is primarily due to abnormalities of the afferent limb of the reflex.

Disruption of primary and secondary esophageal peristalsis by afferent stimulation

Recent studies have shown that afferent signals originating from the pharynx inhibit progression of primary esophageal peristalsis. Our aim was to further elucidate the effect of esophageal and pharyngeal afferent stimulation on primary and secondary esophageal peristalsis. We studied the effect of esophageal air distension and pharyngeal water stimulation on progression of primary and secondary peristalsis in nine healthy volunteers aged 27 +/- 2 yr (4 men, 5 women). At a threshold volume, rapid injection of water into the pharynx, directed posteriorly, resulted in complete halt of the progressing secondary and primary esophageal peristalses in both the proximal and distal esophagus. The threshold volume of injected water for inducing inhibition was similar for secondary (0.6 +/- 0.2 ml) and primary (0.5 +/- 0.1 ml) esophageal peristalsis. Progression of primary peristalsis induced by a dry swallow and secondary peristalsis induced by intraesophageal air distension were completely inhibited by intraesophageal injection of 15 +/- 2 ml of air in 70% and 75% of the trials, respectively. We conclude that afferent signals induced by esophageal air distension and pharyngeal water stimulation inhibit propagation of both primary and secondary esophageal peristalsis, suggesting a shared neural control mechanism for these types of peristalsis.

The effect of mechanoreceptor stimulation of the laryngopharynx on the oesophago-gastric junction

Stimulation of the pharynx by injection of minute amounts of water induces prolonged period of lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) relaxation and augmentation of the crural diaphragm (CD) contraction. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of stimulating mechano-receptors at the laryngopharynx on the LOS and CD by using an air pulse stimulation device. Air pulses were delivered via the internal channel of a flexible endoscope. Oesophageal, LOS, and CD pressures; CD electromyogram; and oesophageal pH 5 cm above the LOS were recorded in nine healthy subjects. Stimulation of the laryngopharynx induced LOS relaxation in the absence of swallow and oesophageal peristalsis. The stimulation of epiglottis and arytenoid produced higher incidence of LOS relaxation compared to the base of tongue. The magnitude of LOS relaxation differed significantly between the three anatomical sites, with greater relaxation occurring at the epiglottis and arytenoid compared with the base of the tongue. None of the LOS relaxations induced by laryngeal stimulation resulted in inhibition of the CD or gastroesophageal reflux. We conclude that stimulation of the laryngopharyngeal mechanoreceptors induces LOS but not CD relaxation. The LOS relaxation induced by laryngopharyngeal stimulation is not accompanied by acid reflux in fasting state.

Different effects of an oral anticholinergic drug on gastroesophageal reflux in upright and supine position in normal, ambulant subjects: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

There is controversy in the literature on the effects of anticholinergic drugs on gastroesophageal reflux. Our aim was to study more extensively the effects of an oral anticholinergic drug on esophageal motility and gastroesophageal reflux in normal ambulant subjects under different circumstances: upright, supine, fed, and fasted state.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy subjects (seven men, eight women), mean age 34 yr (range, 22-61 yr) underwent randomized placebo-controlled 16-h evening and overnight ambulatory esophageal motility/pH study. After a 3-day loading dose of either oral dicyclomine (Dic) 20 mg four times daily or placebo (Pla), an ambulatory esophageal motility/pH study was performed while taking medication or placebo. Each study was analyzed for meal, first and second h postprandial, upright and supine periods, and first 2 h supine after bedtime snack.

RESULTS

The mean number of reflux episodes decreased with dicyclomine during the first h postprandial (Dic, 1.9 vs Pla, 2.5; p < 0.05). During the first 2 h supine, mean number of reflux episodes increased with dicyclomine (Dic, 1.4 vs Pla, 0.8; p < 0.09), as did mean percent time pH < 4 (Dic, 2.6 vs Pla, 0.5; p < 0.04), with an increase in clearance time (Dic, 0.9 vs Pla, 0.3; p < 0.05; in min). Mean peristaltic amplitude decreased with dicyclomine during the 2nd h postprandial (Dic, 48.8 vs Pla, 56.3; p < 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral dicyclomine caused a decrease in early postprandial upright reflux episodes, but also significantly increased the percent time pH < 4 during the first two h supine. Therefore, its effects are dependent on body position and fasted or fed state. Our results justify additional studies with oral anticholinergic agents in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Effect of pharyngeal stimulation on the motor function of the esophagus and its sphincters

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

Sensory impulses from the pharynx induce contraction of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES), relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and inhibition of peristalsis. To determine 1) the magnitude of UES contractile response to threshold volume of fluid that induces LES relaxation and 2) the effect of rapid pharyngeal air stimulation on LES resting pressure and its concurrent influence on the UES and progression of esophageal peristalsis.

METHODS

Eleven healthy volunteers (age, 31 +/- 2 y) were studied by concurrent UES, esophagealbody, and LES manometry.

RESULTS

At a threshold volume of 0.3 +/- 0.05 mL, injections of water into the pharynx directed posteriorly, resulted in complete LES relaxation. Duration of these relaxations averaged 19 +/- 1 seconds. In 10 of 11 subjects, these relaxations were accompanied by a simultaneous increase in UES resting tone that averaged 142% +/- 27% above preinjection values. Pharyngeal stimulation by rapid air injection resulted in complete LES relaxation in 8 of the 11 subjects (threshold volume, 14 +/- 6 mL). Five of 8 developed a concurrent mild increase in resting UES pressure (17% +/- 6% above preinjection values) (P < .05). Pharyngeal water injection inhibited the progression of the peristaltic pressure wave at all tested sites and in all subjects, but pharyngeal air injection in only 2 of the 11 studied subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The inhibitory effect of pharyngeal water injection on LES resting pressure is accompanied by a substantial contractile effect on the UES. Although stimulation of the pharynx by rapid air injection may induce LES relaxation, its inhibitory effect on esophageal peristalsis and stimulatory effect on UES pressure are negligible compared with that of water injection.

Characterization and mechanisms of the pharyngoesophageal inhibitory reflex

The objectives of this study were to identify and to characterize the pharyngoesophageal inhibitory reflex (PEIR) in an animal model. Thirty-one cats (2.4-5.0 kg) were anesthetized using alpha-chloralose (45 mg/kg ip), and esophageal peristalsis was recorded manometrically. Secondary peristalsis was activated by rapid air injection (8-20 ml) at midesophagus or slow infusion of water through the manometric catheters. Neither stimulus activated primary peristalsis. The PEIR was activated by rapid water injection or focal mechanical stimulation of the pharynx. Rapid air injection activated secondary peristalsis in 92% of the trials, and slow water infusion activated 1 secondary peristalsis every 3.2 min. Pharyngeal stimulation by 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, or 1.0 ml of water inhibited or blocked ongoing secondary peristalsis in 67, 82, 97, or 93% of trials, respectively. Mechanical stimulation of the posterior wall of the pharynx with 11-20 g pressure attenuated secondary peristalsis in 96% of the trials or blocked secondary peristalsis in 41% of the trials. Centripetal electrical stimulation at 30 Hz, 0.2 ms, 2 V for 4 s of the superior laryngeal (SLN) or glossopharyngeal (GPN) nerves blocked or inhibited secondary peristalsis in 100% of the trials. Bilateral transection of the GPN (n = 8), but not the SLN (n = 6), blocked the PEIR. Anesthetization of the pharyngeal mucosa using lidocaine (2%) blocked the PEIR (n = 3). We concluded that 1) the PEIR exists in the cat, 2) mechanical stimulation of the pharynx more strongly activates the PEIR than water, 3) activation of either SLN or GPN afferents attenuates ongoing secondary peristalsis, 4) the receptors mediating the PEIR are located in the pharyngeal mucosa, and 5) both SLN and GPN contribute to the PEIR, but the GPN is the major afferent limb of this reflex.

Characterization of the pharyngo-UES contractile reflex in humans

Preliminary human studies suggest the presence of an upper esophageal sphincter (UES) contractile reflex triggered by pharyngeal water stimulation. The purposes of this study were to further characterize this reflex and determine the threshold volume for its activation. We studied 10 healthy young volunteers by manometric technique before and after topical pharyngeal anesthesia. UES pressure responses to various volumes and temperatures of water injected into the pharynx were elucidated. At a threshold volume, rapid-pulse and slow continuous pharyngeal water injection resulted in significant augmentation of UES pressure in all volunteers. Threshold volume for inducing UES contraction averaged 0.1 +/- 0.01 ml for rapid-pulse injection and was significantly smaller than that for slow continuous injection (1.0 +/- 0.2 ml). UES pressure increase duration averaged 16 +/- 4 s. Augmentation of UES resting tone by injection of water with three different temperatures was similar. This augmentation was abolished after topical anesthesia. Conclusions were that stimulation of the human pharynx by injection of minute amounts of water results in a significant increase in resting UES pressure: the pharyngo-UES contractile reflex. The magnitude of pressure increase due to activation of this reflex is not volume or temperature dependent. Loss of pharyngeal sensation abolishes this reflex.

Effect of lactulose and fiber-rich diets on bile in relation to gallstone disease: an update

The primum movens in cholesterol gallstone formation is hepatic cholesterol hypersecretion and chronic supersaturation of bile. From this event a cascade of contributing factors can be differentiated: (i) Motility defects with impaired gallbladder contractility and gallbladder stasis, but also with small and large intestinal hypomotility. (ii) Multiple biochemical defects in gallbladder bile with increased biliary proteins, increased deoxycholic acid and rapid crystallization of biliary cholesterol from supersaturated unstable vesicles. There is considerable evidence that slow intestinal and colonic transit can increase the deoxycholic acid pool size and biliary cholesterol saturation. Changes in intestinal transit influence the anaerobic bacterial enzymatic biotransformation of conjugated cholate to more hydrophobic deoxycholate. This leads to biliary cholesterol hypersecretion and gallstone formation. Prokinetic drugs or administration of lactulose or fiber products like bran can change the slow intestinal transit favourably with subsequent reduction in deoxycholic acid formation and cholesterol saturation of bile. Whether these applications are indeed of value in the long-term prevention of gallstone disease, however, is doubtful, since fiber-rich diet in prevention of gallstone recurrence after complete gallstone dissolution was not successful.

Effect of atropine on the frequency of reflux and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in normal subjects

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Low basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure is believed to be an important mechanism of reflux. The effects of atropine on the frequency and mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux under the experimental conditions of a low basal LES pressure in 13 normal subjects were studied.

METHODS

LES pressure, esophageal pressures, esophageal pH, and crural diaphragm electromyogram were recorded simultaneously in the postprandial period for 30 minutes before and two 30-minute periods after the injection of atropine.

RESULTS

Atropine reduced the basal LES pressure from 16.4 +/- 3 to 8.7 +/- 2 mm Hg. The frequencies of reflux in the control and two postatropine periods were 3.5 +/- 0.5, 0.4 +/- 0.2, and 0.8 +/- 0.3, respectively (P < 0.05). The frequencies of transient LES relaxations decreased from 3.5 +/- 0.5 in the control to 0.4 +/- 0.2 and 1.5 +/- 0.4 in the two postatropine periods (P < 0.05). Transient LES relaxation and associated inhibition of the crural diaphragm was the major mechanism of reflux under conditions of low LES pressure induced by atropine.

CONCLUSIONS

Atropine-induced low LES pressure does not predispose to reflux in normal healthy subjects. Atropine reduces the frequency of reflux by its inhibitory effect on the frequency of transient LES relaxation.