A pathological classification of nasal fractures

Analysis of Nasal Bone Fractures: A 17-year Study of 3785 Patients

In our previous study, we classified nasal bone fractures into 6 types based on computed tomography and the patterns of the nasal bone fractures (NBF) in 503 patients treated between 1998 and 2004. In the present study, we analyzed 3785 patients treated between 2005 and 2021. The age, sex, etiology, associated injuries, pattern of fractures, and treatments were reviewed, and radiographic studies were analyzed. The highest incidence was in the age group of 10 to 19 years (N=870, 23.0%), followed by 20 to 29 years (N=792, 20.9%) and 30 to 39 years (N=635, 16.8%). The most common causes of injury were slip or fall-down (42.3%), violence (24.3%), sports (19.2%), traffic accidents (8.9%), and work-related (5.3%). Most of the patients had tenderness (96.1%) and swelling (78.8%). Other findings were depression (27.1%) and nasal deviation (25.8%). Crepitus was heard in only 0.4% of the patients. The patterns of the NBFs classified by computed tomography findings were type IIA (unilateral simple fracture with displacement/without telescoping, 1283 cases, 33.9%), IIB (bilateral simple fracture with displacement/without telescoping, 786 cases, 20.8%), IIAs (unilateral simple fracture with septal fracture and displacement/without telescoping, 566 cases, 14.9%), IIBs (bilateral simple fracture with septal fracture and displacement/without telescoping 530 cases, 14.0%), I (simple fracture without displacement, 522 cases, 13.8%), and III (comminuted with telescoping or depression, 98 cases, 2.6%). In most of the cases (3,666, 96.9%), closed reduction was performed. The present analysis is one of the largest data sets on NBF in Korea, which could provide reference values for diagnosing and managing nasal bone fractures.

Precisely Closed Reduction of Nasal Bone Fracture Assisted With Plain Film Measurements Under the Picture Archiving and Communication System

OBJECTIVES

To prevent aesthetic and functional deformities, precisely closed reduction is crucial in the management of nasal fractures. Plain film radiography (PF), ultrasonography (USG), and computed tomography can help confirm the diagnosis and classification of fractures and assist in performing closed reduction. However, no study in the literature reports on precisely closed reduction assisted with PF measurements under the picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 153 patients with nasal bone fracture between January 2013 and December 2017. Surgeons conducted precisely closed reduction assisted with PF measurement of the distance between the fracture site and nasal tip under PACS on 34 patients (group A). Another group on 119 patients were reduced under surgeon's experience (group B).

RESULTS

No significant differences in age, gender, Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification, and reduction outcome were observed between group A and group B (P > .05). The operative time of the group A was significantly lower (12.50 ± 4.64 minutes) compared to group B (23.78 ± 11.20 minutes; P < .001). After adjusted age, gender, and AO classification, patients in group A scored 10.46 minutes less on the operative time than those in group B (P < .001). In addition, the severity of nasal bone fracture (AO classification, β = 3.37, P = .002) was positive associated with the operative time.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, closed reduction in nasal bone fracture assisted with PF measurements under PACS was performed precisely, thereby effectively decreasing operative time and the occurrence of complications. This procedure requires neither the use of new instruments or C-arm nor USG or navigation experience. Moreover, reduction can be easily performed using this method, and it requires short operative time, helps achieve great reduction, less radiation exposures, and is cost-effective.

Nasal Fractures

This article outlines current methods in the evaluation and management of nasal fractures including clinical workup, imaging, and treatment.

A new approach to recording nasal fracture in skeletonized individuals

OBJECTIVE

This work describes a new method for recording nasal fracture in skeletonized individuals, suitable for use in biocultural studies of violence and fracture in past societies.

METHODS

The method consists in recording the 'side of fracture', 'side of deviation', 'type of fracture', 'other facial fractures', and stage of 'bone remodeling'.

RESULTS

A lateral impact force to the facial area is typical of interpersonal violence. This may result in a unilateral nasal fracture and/or a laterally deviated nose. Given the predominance of right-handedness in human populations, side of fracture and, especially, side of deviation, may be useful indices of interpersonal violence. As regards fracture type, although a distal fracture of the nasal bones is the most common type, their comminution may be associated with higher impact forces. The presence of other facial fractures may also be an indicator of high-energy impacts.

CONCLUSIONS

Different patterns of nasal trauma may be consistent with different etiologies.

SIGNIFICANCE

The method is focused at improving our ability to distinguish the direction and type of impact that caused the injury and, in particular, whether, at a population or sub-group level, such injuries are likely to be predominantly due to violence or to other causes.

LIMITATIONS

Well healed fractures of the nasal bones or injury to the septum may be difficult to identify. Also, it is not possible to confirm if nasal and other facial fractures are temporally concurrent.

SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

To test this method using skeletal collections with known trauma history or 3D prints of modern nasal injuries of known etiologies.

Long-term postoperative satisfaction and complications in nasal bone fracture patients according to fracture type, site, and severity

Background

It is difficult to completely fix nasal bone fractures with closed reduction, as it is often accompanied by septal cartilage damage, and this often results in postoperative secondary deformities. Thus, patients are often reluctant to undergo closed reduction surgery. The present study aimed to evaluate aesthetic and functional satisfaction, as well as satisfaction with and complications of closed reduction, according to nasal bone fracture type.

Methods

The subjects were patients who underwent closed reduction under general anesthesia from January 2017 to December 2018. Based on the modified Murray classification, patients were classified into five groups according to the fracture site, septal fracture, and deviation. A total of 211 patients were sent a web-based survey on postoperative satisfaction and complications, as well as intention for revision and cosmetic surgery. Sixty-one patients (28.9%) responded.

Results

There were no significant differences in aesthetic and functional satisfaction or satisfaction with closed reduction according to the fracture type, site, or severity. Postoperative functional complications developed in 14 of 61 patients (22.95%). With 10 out of 24 (41.67%) patients (p = 0.044), the bilateral fracture with septal fracture or prominent septal deviation type had a higher incidence of complications than the other types.

Conclusion

The incidence of complications is higher for bilateral fracture with septal fracture or prominent septal deviation compared to the other nasal bone fracture types. Therefore, long-term follow-up after closed reduction surgery for this fracture type can aid in establishing additional postoperative treatment plans and improving patient satisfaction.

Clinical Analysis of Nasal Bone Fracture in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Dorsal Augmentation Using Silicone Implants: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

There are no studies about the treatment of nasal bone fractures in patients with dorsal augmentations using silicone implants. We aimed to describe the characteristics of nasal bone fracture in patients who underwent rhinoplasty and compare the difference between closed reduction and conservative treatment of nasal bone fractures in patients with a history of rhinoplasty.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and June 2018, a total of 463 patients were admitted to our center for nasal bone fracture; 17 patients with nasal bone fractures who underwent rhinoplasty were included, of which, five underwent closed reduction in the nasal bone and 12 underwent conservative treatment. Three of 12 patients who were initially treated conservatively underwent a secondary rhinoplasty for esthetic improvements. All patients were classified according to fracture site and the presence of a nasal septal fracture-in accordance with the modified Murray classification-and were analyzed for the correlation between fracture type and disease course.

RESULTS

The nasal bone fracture types per computed tomography findings were unilateral (n = 13), bilateral (n = 4), septal (n = 1), and M-type (n = 1). No significant differences in fracture site (P > 0.05) and the presence of a nasal septal fracture (P > 0.05) were found between the groups. Fracture type did not significantly differ among patients who underwent closed reduction, conservative treatment without secondary rhinoplasty, and secondary rhinoplasty (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite risking traumatic capsular rupture, implant removal is seldom required and closed reduction is recommended if visible deviations are present; otherwise, only conservative treatment is recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Lateral nasal wall abscess following manipulation of fractured nasal bones

Nasal fracture accounts for over 50% of facial fractures and is a frequent presentation to ear, nose and throat emergency clinics. Optimal management of nasal injuries with deformity is by manipulation under anaesthetic and should be offered when appropriate. A healthy 27-year-old woman presented with a lateral nasal wall mass with purulent discharge 1 month following manipulation. CT imaging revealed a mass arising from fragments of the nasal bone, consistent with an abscess. Bone fragments and purulent material were initially debrided, with a subsequent formal excision of a persistent granuloma performed with an excellent cosmetic outcome. This appears to be the first description of a granuloma resulting from a closed reduction-manipulation of a nasal fracture.

Correlation Between the Existing Classifications of Nasal Bone Fractures and Subjective Patient Satisfaction

Since the nose is at the center of the face, small changes to it can cause a big overall change. Therefore, a nasal fracture needs to be operated on when deformity is expected. Although many taxonomies have been developed for nasal bone fractures, no study has aimed to predict individual patient satisfaction. Herein, the authors tried to determine any correlation between the existing classifications of nasal bone fractures and subjective patient satisfaction. A retrospective study and telephone survey were conducted in 149 patients who underwent closed reduction for a pure nasal bone fracture. Pretraumatic, prereduction, and postoperative patient satisfactions were measured on a numerical scale from 1 to 5. The difference between pretraumatic and prereduction satisfactions was calculated to confirm the change in short-term satisfaction after trauma. The difference between pretraumatic and preoperative satisfactions was measured to determine change in long-term satisfaction postoperatively. The Stranc Robertson classification, modified Murray classification, and the presence of septal fracture were used to classify fractures. Independent and Jonckheere-Terpstra t tests were used in statistical analysis. Only 86 of 149 were included in the study. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction among frontal/lateral (P = 0.70, 0.56), frontal I/II (P = 1.00, 0.24), and lateral I/II groups (P = 0.57, 0.67) according to the Stranc Robertson classification. Septal fracture (P = 0.21, 0.44) and the modified Murray classification (P = 0.14, 0.47) also had no effect on satisfaction. Existing classification systems have the advantage of reflecting and distinguishing the characteristics of fractures, but there is a limit in their ability to reflect subjective patient satisfaction.

The Diagnosis and Management of Facial Bone Fractures

Appropriate medical care for a patient with a facial fracture can not only optimize aesthetic outcomes but also prevent the potential morbidity and mortality of delayed treatment. In this article, we focus on the clinical presentations, physical examination findings, diagnostic imaging, consultations, and follow-up that patients with facial fractures need related to their emergency department management. Specifically, we address the nuances of evaluating frontal, orbital, nasal, maxillofacial, and mandibular fractures.

Correction of Nasal Fractures

Nasal fractures are the most frequently fractured facial bone from blunt facial trauma resulting in a significant number of patients seeking treatment. Proper evaluation and treatment in the acute setting can minimize secondary surgeries, lower overall health care costs, and increase patient satisfaction. Nasal fracture management, however, varies widely between surgeons. The open treatment of isolated nasal fractures is a particularly controversial subject. This review seeks to describe the existing literature in isolated nasal fracture management.

The accuracy of different methods for diagnosing septal deviation in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty: A prospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of different diagnostic tests in predicting nasal septum deformities during preoperative planning for septorhinoplasty.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent septorhinoplasty between June 2011 and August 2012 were included (n = 30) and underwent a protocol of diagnostic tests, including nasal speculoscopy, craniofacial computed tomography (CT), three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the nasal septum by CT and nasal endoscopy. A modified Guyuron classification of septal deformities was used for classifying the septal deviations. Direct surgical assessment of the nasal septum during open septorhinoplasty was the reference standard with which each of the diagnostic tests was compared. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of each test were calculated.

RESULTS

The preoperative diagnosis was nasal bone fracture in 11 patients, nasal septal fracture in 15 and post-traumatic nasal deformity in four. For type A deviations (localised), craniofacial CT showed the highest performance with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. For type B septal deformations (C shape), nasal endoscopy (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 87.5%; PPV, 87.7%; and NPV, 100%) showed the highest performance. For type C deformities (S shape), nasal endoscopy (sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 100%; PPV, 100%; and NPV, 87%) showed the highest performance. The accuracy for nasal endoscopy was 27/30 (90%), 26/30 (87%) for craniofacial CT, 22/30 (73%) for 3D reconstruction and 10/28 (36%) for speculoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal endoscopy and craniofacial CT were more accurate and precise than nasal speculoscopy and 3D reconstruction for preoperative evaluation of the nasal septum, thus enabling more appropriate surgical planning for septorhinoplasty.

Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of nasal fractures

INTRODUCTION

This study examined the diagnostic value of ultrasound and radiography compared with clinical examinations as the gold standard method to determine whether ultrasound can be used for early diagnosis of nasal fracture.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted on 128 patients with clinical signs of nasal fracture. Radiography in all patients was performed by 2 different radiologists on Waters and lateral view with a 10-MHz ultrasound probe, and clinical examinations were done by an ENT specialist. Radiography and ultrasound findings were recorded and compared with the final diagnosis which was based on clinical examinations. Results were analyzed with different statistical methods to determine sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

RESULTS

In the assessment of fracture with ultrasound, sensitivity was 84%, specificity 75%, accuracy 82%, positive predictive value 91%, and negative predictive value 61%. In the assessment of fracture on lateral view radiography, sensitivity was 50%, specificity 72%, accuracy 55%, positive predictive value 84%, and negative predictive value 32%. On Waters view radiography, sensitivity was 53%, specificity 65%, accuracy 56%, positive predictive value 82%, and negative predictive value 31%. On lateral-waters view radiography, sensitivity was 64%, specificity 58%, accuracy 62%, positive predictive value 82%, and negative predictive value 34%. Fracture diagnosis by ultrasound was significantly better as compared with radiography (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The nasal bone ultrasound study is a useful method in determining the nasal fracture and radiography can be replaced with ultrasound in early diagnosis of fracture.

The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Midface Fractures - Level 3 Tutorial

This tutorial outlines the details of the AOCMF image-based classification system for fractures of the midface at the precision level 3. The topography of the different midface regions (central midface-upper central midface, intermediate central midface, lower central midface-incorporating the naso-orbito-ethmoid region; lateral midface-zygoma and zygomatic arch, palate) is subdivided in much greater detail than in level 2 going beyond the Le Fort fracture types and its analogs. The level 3 midface classification system is presented along with guidelines to precisely delineate the fracture patterns in these specific subregions. It is easy to plot common fracture entities, such as nasal and naso-orbito-ethmoid, and their variants due to the refined structural layout of the subregions. As a key attribute, this focused approach permits to document the occurrence of fragmentation (i.e., single vs. multiple fracture lines), displacement, and bone loss. Moreover, the preinjury dental state and the degree of alveolar atrophy in edentulous maxillary regions can be recorded. On the basis of these individual features, tooth injuries, periodontal trauma, and fracture involvement of the alveolar process can be assessed. Coding rules are given to set up a distinctive formula for typical midface fractures and their combinations. The instructions and illustrations are elucidated by a series of radiographic imaging examples. A critical appraisal of the design of this level 3 midface classification is made.

The Retrospective Study of Closed Reduction of Nasal Bone Fracture

Purpose:

This study was conducted in order to investigate the therapeutic effect of closed reduction according to a classification in patients with nasal bone fracture.

Methods:

The study was conducted retrospectively on 186 patients with a mean age of 38 years (range: 7 to 80 years). All patients were diagnosed by clinical and radiologic examination, and then classified according to Hwang’s classification by computed tomography. The patients were further classified by their age, gender, causes of fracture, operation timing after fracture, concurrent facial bone fracture, and complications. All patients underwent the same reduction and treatment protocol and were then followed up regularly for at least three months.

Results:

The cause of the fracture was slip down, and the highest prevalence was shown in the 20s. The mean operation timing after fracture was 4.1 days (range: 1 to 14 days), and it tended to be longer in the case of defected septal bone or more severe fracture. The most common concurrent facial bone fracture was orbital blow-out fracture, and zygomaticomaxillary complex and maxillary fracture occured frequently. The largest number of complications occurred in class III and IIBs patients, and the main complication was postoperative pain.

Conclusion:

Results of nasal bone closed reduction on the 186 patients showed that serious complications rarely occurred. Closed reduction is generally an effective treatment for nasal bone fracture. However, in the case of severe concurrent septal bone fracture or comminuted fracture with depression, open reduction should be considered. Further study with a larger number of patients and further classification is required.

Utility of computed tomography scans in predicting need for surgery in nasal injuries

In many centers, computed tomography (CT) scan is preferred over plain film radiographs in the setting of acute nasal injury because CT scan is thought to be more sensitive in predicting nasal bone fracture. However, the usefulness of CT scans in predicting the need for surgery in acute nasal injury has not been well-studied. We conducted a retrospective review of 232 patients with known nasal bone fracture and found very similar rates of surgery in patients with a diagnosis of nasal fracture by CT scan as by nasal radiographs (41 and 37%, respectively). This suggests that experienced clinical examination remains the gold standard for determining the need for surgery in isolated nasal trauma, regardless of CT findings.

Acquired defects of the nose and naso-orbitoethmoid (NOE) region

Nasal injuries coupled with midface fractures of the orbit and ethmoids constitute a nasoorbitoethmoid (NOE) fracture pattern, which is typically the most challenging facial fracture to repair. Hard and soft tissue defects of this region may require advanced reconstruction techniques, including local rotational flaps, free tissue transfer, and even prosthetics. The restoration of form and function dictates treatment, and the success of primary repair is paramount, because secondary correction is challenging in this area of the midface. Because of the complex nature of this region, this discussion is divided into hard tissue defects, with a focus on trauma, and soft tissue defects, with a focus on oncology.

Evaluation and reduction of nasal trauma

Nasal trauma plays a large and important role in the field of craniofacial trauma. The resulting aesthetic, structural, and functional sequelae associated with these injuries necessitate a thorough understanding of the topic. This includes an appreciation for the unique anatomic features of the region, the important aspects of the initial history and examination, nasal injury classification, and subsequent treatment timing and options. While a large body of literature has accumulated on the topic, the purpose of this article is to focus on both clinically relevant information and pearls of management. Additionally, age-specific concerns, secondary procedures, and nasal fracture grafting, will be addressed as well.

A new approach to the treatment of nasal bone fracture: radiologic classification of nasal bone fractures and its clinical application

PURPOSE

A radiologic examination is required in the treatment of nasal bone fracture to determine the fracture condition. Thus, there is an increasing need for radiologic classification of nasal bone fractures that can be applied to clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Computed tomography was performed in 125 patients with nasal bone fractures to determine which axial view best showed the entire nasal view. The obtained axial view was then used as a reference for classification. The length from the top to the base of the nasal bone was divided into upper, middle, and lower levels, after which the fracture location was determined. If the fracture spanned the boundaries of these levels, it was classified as the total level. Subsequently, the fracture was subclassified based on the fracture direction and pattern and the concurrent fracture.

RESULTS

Radiologic examination of patients with nasal bone fracture showed that nasal bone fracture was frequently found at the total, middle, upper, and lower levels, in that order. Nasal bone fractures at the upper level showed lower frequencies of complication and reoperation than the fractures at the other levels, whereas nasal bone fractures at the total level showed the highest frequencies of complication and reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Radiologic classification can be useful for preoperative and postoperative evaluations of nasal bone fractures and can be helpful in understanding such fractures because it can efficiently predict the prognosis of a fracture.

Comparison of high-resolution ultrasonography and computed tomography in the diagnosis of nasal fractures

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the value of high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) and computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of nasal fractures.

METHODS

Facial CT and HRUS examinations performed on 140 consecutive patients (103 male and 37 female; age range, 2-74 years; mean, 26 years) with nasal trauma between October 2004 and April 2007 were retrospectively evaluated. Sonograms were obtained with a hockey stick probe (15-7 MHz linear array transducer). All patients also underwent facial CT and conventional radiography. The nasal fracture detection rates for HRUS, CT, and conventional radiography were compared with the clinical and surgical diagnosis. Nasal fractures were classified into high- and low-grade groups according to severity. They were also compared with the CT findings of all 280 lateral nasal bones and with HRUS findings as the reference standard.

RESULTS

The accuracy rates for HRUS, CT, and conventional radiography in detecting nasal fractures were 100%, 92.1%, and 78.6%, respectively. Compared with HRUS, CT revealed only 196 of 233 lateral nasal bone fractures; its accuracy was 80%. In high-grade fractures, the accuracy of CT was 87%, but it decreased to 68% in low-grade fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with HRUS, CT had lower accuracy, especially in low-grade nasal fractures. Thus, HRUS is a reliable diagnostic tool for the evaluation of nasal fractures.

Nasal trauma and the deviated nose

As the most prominent facial feature, the nose carries an increased risk of traumatic injury. Nasal fracture is the most common bone injury of the adult face and frequently results from motor vehicle accidents, sports-related injuries, and altercations. Although often initially considered minor, nasal fracture may eventually result in significant cosmetic or functional defects. Optimal management of nasal trauma in the acute setting is critical in minimizing secondary nasal deformities. In recent years, numerous guidelines have been described to refine and optimize acute nasal trauma management. However, restoration of pretraumatic form and function remains a challenge. Commonly the product of a poorly addressed underlying structural injury, posttraumatic nasal deformity requiring subsequent rhinoplasty or septorhinoplasty remains in as many as 50 percent of cases. In this article, the authors review the anatomic, diagnostic, and management considerations as well as discuss their own experience in approaching nasal trauma and the deviated nose.

A clinically applicable reporting system for the diagnosis of facial fractures

A clinically applicable, comprehensive reporting system for the diagnosis of facial fractures was developed with three guiding principles: (1) preservation of classical anatomical terminology and nomenclature, (2) facilitation of uniform interpretation of radiographs between radiologists and (3) non-redundant diagnostic descriptions of complex fractures, in a manner that correlates with treatment modality. Twenty-two fracture types (17 simple fracture types and 5 complex fracture types) are included in the system. Each patient's fracture pattern is described by listing the component fractures present. A short narrative (modifying description) is provided after each fracture listed. Simple fractures that help to comprise more complex fractures are not listed separately, but are described within the modifying description of the complex fracture they help to comprise. When components of multiple complex fractures are present, a hierarchy of complex fractures dictates which fracture is described first. Additional complex fractures are only described separately when they do not share common components. In all other cases, the second (lower order) complex fracture is best described by simply listing the component (simple or complex) fractures that are not accounted for in the higher order complex fracture. Adoption of this reporting system should improve communication between emergency medicine physicians, radiologists and surgeons.

Analysis of nasal bone fractures; a six-year study of 503 patients

The aim of this study is to classify the nasal bone fractures based on computed tomography (CT) analysis and patterns of the nasal bone fractures, and review 503 cases treated between 1998-2004 at the Department of Plastic Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, South Korea. The age, sex, etiology, associated injuries, pattern of fractures and treatments were reviewed and a radiographic study was analyzed. Plain simple radiographs of lateral and Waters view of the nasal bones combined with computed tomography scans were done. Nasal bone fractures were classified into six types: Type I) Simple without displacement; Type II) Simple with displacement/without telescoping; IIA; Unilateral; IIAs) Unilateral with septal fracture; IIB) Bilateral; IIBs) Bilateral with septal fracture; Type III) Comminuted with telescoping or depression. Diagnosis of nasal bone fractures were made positively by plain x-ray films in 82% of cases, negative finding was 9.5% and 8.5% of cases were suspicious of the fractures. Reliability of the plain film radiographs of the nasal bone fracture was 82% in this study. In the most of the fractured nasal bones (93%) the closed reduction was done, open reduction in 4% and no surgical intervention in 3%. Nasal reduction was carried out in average 6.5 days post the injury. The patterns of the nasal bones fractures classified by CT findings were type IIA (182 cases, 36%), IIBs (105 cases, 21%), IIB (90 cases, 18%), IIAs (66 cases, 13%), I (39 cases, 8%) and III (21 cases, 4.3%). We think the CT is necessary for diagnosing nasal bone fracture because the reliability of the plain film was only 82%.

Management of nasal bone fractures

This review discusses treatment options for nasal fracture, a common condition due mainly to road accidents, sport injuries, and physical confrontations. Being frequently associated with multiple trauma, many broken noses are not promptly diagnosed and treated, leading to secondary nasal deformities and chronic obstructions. A description of nasal anatomy is followed by considerations on the pathogenesis of nasal fracture and its clinical assessment. Each patient's history must be recorded (cause of trauma, previous facial injuries, prior nasal deformity, or obstruction) and careful physical examination guides the choice of treatment (open vs closed reduction), its timing, and the type of anesthesia required. Adequate follow-up is essential. Manipulation under local anesthesia is an effective first-line treatment for simple nasal fractures and should become a standard practice, but any associated septal injury can be responsible for postoperative nasal deformity and obstruction so other options may need to be considered.

Pre- and postoperative x-ray and computed tomography evaluation in acute nasal fracture

Between January 1997 and July 2003, 156 acute nasal fractures were treated by closed reduction in Ishikiri-Seiki Hospital. For all patients, x-ray and computed tomography (CT) taken pre- and postoperatively were used to classify fractures and evaluate postoperative conditions. Acute nasal fractures requiring surgery were classified into the following 5 types. Unilateral type (U), bilateral type (B), frontal type (F), laterofrontal type (L), and comminuted type (C). Postoperative conditions were classified as good, fair, or poor. On statistical analysis, it was found that reduction is easier in the U, F, B, L, and C types in order. Furthermore, it was found that in the U, B, and F types, reduction can be performed after swelling has subsided, but in the L and L+C types, reduction should be performed earlier. On follow-up x-ray and CT, there was no significant difference between the postoperative evaluation and follow-up evaluation. A few overreduced cases improved, but correct reduction was preferable to overreduction. Accurate preoperative understanding of the fracture type and postoperative evaluation by x-ray and CT are necessary to obtain good results and to decrease secondary deformity caused by poor primary reduction.

Septal fracture in simple nasal bone fracture

SUMMARY

Nasal bone fractures are the most common type of facial fractures. Previous studies have shown that most nasal fractures involve the septum, which can provide an obstacle to the successful reduction of nasal bone fractures. In particular, septal fractures in combination with simple nasal bone fractures are usually unrecognized and untreated at the time of injury. Furthermore, systemized treatment protocols and diagnostic tools for septal fractures in the case of simple nasal bone fracture have not previously been presented. In this study, the clinical findings of septal fractures in cases of simple nasal bone fracture were correlated with symptoms, signs, and computed tomography findings and assessed statistically. The patterns of septal fractures in simple nasal bone fractures were assessed by direct vision via hemitransfixion incision. Of the 52 patients with simple nasal bone fracture who presented over a 3-year period and were included in this study, 10 were female and 42 were male, with an average age of 33.8 years (age range, 18 to 61 years). Fifty of these patients (96.2 percent) showed septal fractures, and septoplasty or submucosal resection was performed on 41 patients (78.8 percent) who manifested severe septal fractures of perioperative septal grade 3 or higher. Closed reduction of the nasal bone fracture only was performed on the remaining 11 patients. Among the signs evident at physical examination, mucosal tearing was found to be statistically significant for septal fracture. Computed tomography was found to be very helpful in diagnosing septal fracture but could not predict its severity accurately (Spearman correlation coefficient between computed tomography septal grading and perioperative septal grading, 33.5 percent). Therefore, computed tomography could not be used as a definitive diagnostic modality for septal fractures in terms of deciding whether septoplasty or submucous resection was needed. It is evident that septal fractures are frequent in simple nasal bone fractures that are not combined with other facial bone fractures. This study confirms that there are differences between radiologic findings and perioperative findings. To reduce the incidence of posttraumatic nasal deformity, meticulous physical examinations with subsequent septoplasty or submucosal resection are needed in the treatment of simple nasal bone fracture.

The closed reduction of nasal fractures: an evaluation of two techniques

Two techniques of closed reduction and fixation of nasal fractures are reported and the results compared. Both patients' and surgeon's postoperative evaluations of these techniques were favorable.

Local versus general anaesthetic in the management of the fractured nose

Displaced fractured noses are usually manipulated under general anesthetic. The appearances of fractured noses were assessed and the airways measured by rhinomanometry before and after nasal manipulation in 29 patients. Seventeen received a local anaesthetic (LA) and 12 a general anaesthetic (GA) for the manipulation. Patients were generally pleased with the outcome and there were no significant differences between results in the 2 groups. Bony manipulation did not affect the nasal airway. Local anaesthesia was acceptable to all but one patient. The benefits, including those of cost and safety, of local anaesthetic for manipulation of almost all fractured noses are discussed.