Comparison of the effects of antipsychotic drugs on the schedule-controlled behavior of squirrel monkeys and pigeons

Olanzapine and risperidone disrupt conditioned avoidance responding by selectively weakening motivational salience of conditioned stimulus: further evidence

Suppression of conditioned avoidance response is a preclinical behavioral index of antipsychotic activity. Previous work shows that olanzapine and risperidone disrupt avoidance response elicited by a less salient conditioned stimulus (CS2) to a greater extent than avoidance elicited by a more salient stimulus (CS1), suggesting that antipsychotic drugs may have a weakening action on motivational salience of stimuli. In the present study, we further examined this mechanism of antipsychotic action, focusing on the possible impact of baseline difference of CS1 and CS2 response rates on the avoidance-disruptive effect of olanzapine and risperidone. Rats were first trained to acquire avoidance responding in a procedure in which the number of CS2 trials (i.e. 20) was twice the number of CS1 trials (i.e. 10), but the percentage of CS2-shock pairing was set at 25% lower (15 trials out of 20) than the percentage of CS1-shock pairing (20 trials out of 20). They were then tested daily under olanzapine (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg, sc) or risperidone (0.33 and 1.0 mg/kg, sc) for 5 consecutive days. Repeated olanzapine and risperidone treatment dose-dependently disrupted avoidance responding to both CS1 and CS2. Both drugs at the high dose disrupted the CS2 avoidance to a greater extent than the CS1 avoidance. In the final challenge test, rats previously treated with olanzapine were tested under risperidone (0.33 mg/kg), whereas rats previously treated with risperidone were tested under olanzapine (0.5 mg/kg). Results show that rats previously treated with risperidone 1.0mg/kg group made significantly fewer avoidance responses than the vehicles under olanzapine at 0.5 mg/kg. These findings confirm that olanzapine and risperidone disrupt avoidance response primarily by selectively attenuating the motivational salience of the CS. The present study also suggests that there is a generality of antipsychotic drug experience that is mediated by a shared interoceptive drug state mechanism.

Structural and functional evolution of the basal ganglia in vertebrates

While a basal ganglia with striatal and pallidal subdivisions is 1 clearly present in many extant anamniote species, this basal ganglia is cell sparse and receives only a relatively modest tegmental dopaminergic input and little if any cortical input. The major basal ganglia influence on motor functions in anamniotes appears to be exerted via output circuits to the tectum. In contrast, in modern mammals, birds, and reptiles (i.e., modern amniotes), the striatal and pallidal parts of the basal ganglia are very neuron-rich, both consist of the same basic populations of neurons in all amniotes, and the striatum receives abundant tegmental dopaminergic and cortical input. The functional circuitry of the basal ganglia also seems very similar in all amniotes, since the major basal ganglia influences on motor functions appear to be exerted via output circuits to both cerebral cortex and tectum in sauropsids (i.e., birds and reptiles) and mammals. The basal ganglia, output circuits to the cortex, however, appear to be considerably more developed in mammals than in birds and reptiles. The basal ganglia, thus, appears to have undergone a major elaboration during the evolutionary transition from amphibians to reptiles. This elaboration may have enabled amniotes to learn and/or execute a more sophisticated repertoire of behaviors and movements, and this ability may have been an important element of the successful adaptation of amniotes to a fully terrestrial habitat. The mammalian lineage appears, however, to have diverged somewhat from the sauropsid lineage with respect to the emergence of the cerebral cortex as the major target of the basal ganglia circuitry devoted to executing the basal ganglia-mediated control of movement.

Treatment of schizophrenia: a clinical and preclinical evaluation of neuroleptic drugs

Forty years after the first clinical report on the effectiveness of chlorpromazine in psychiatric patients, neuroleptic drugs are still the most widely used drugs in the treatment of schizophrenia. Indeed, there are no other drugs which have proven to be as effective in the treatment of this severe psychiatric disorder. Yet, there are still many unresolved problems relating to neuroleptic drugs. The present review gives a comprehensive overview of our knowledge (and our lack of knowledge) with respect to the clinical and preclinical effects of neuroleptic drugs and tries to integrate this knowledge in order to identify the neuronal mechanisms underlying the therapeutic and side effects of neuroleptic drugs.

Schedule-controlled brain self-stimulation: has it utility for behavioral pharmacology?

We review evidence that schedule-controlled intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) has properties in common with conventional reinforcements, such as food and water, but unlike the latter, animals will respond for ICSS for long periods of time at a near-constant rate. Schedule-controlled ICSS has proven to be more sensitive to drug-induced changes than has ICSS on a continuous reinforcement schedule, and it permits a more fine-grained analysis of the pattern of responding that results in the reinforcement. Evidence is accumulating that the schedule of ICSS itself leads to neurochemical changes in areas of the brain, such as the nucleus accumbens, in which reward processes occur. Results obtained from schedule-controlled ICSS would complement those obtained by drug self-administration studies which generally use intermittent reinforcement. A systematic examination of ICSS schedules at different brain sites would greatly facilitate our interpretation of drug effects and this would have utility for behavioral pharmacology.

Molindone: effects in pigeons responding under conditional discrimination tasks

Pigeons were trained to respond under three conditional discrimination procedures; 1) a fixed-consecutive-number procedure with (FCN 8-SD) and without (FCN 8) an added external discriminative stimulus, 2) a delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) procedure using 0-sec, 2-sec and 8-sec delay intervals, and 3) a repeated acquisition of behavioral chains (RA) procedure using a four-link response chain with three stimulus keys. The atypical neuroleptic agent molindone decreased accuracy under the FCN 8 at doses that had no effect on accuracy under the FCN 8-SD. Under the DMTS procedure, molindone-induced decreases in accuracy were directly related to the delay interval, with the largest relative decrements obtained at the 8-sec delay and the smallest at the 0-sec delay. Under the RA procedure, molindone decreased accuracy at doses that had little or no effect on the number of correct responses emitted. Relative to control values, molindone-induced decreases in accuracy were smallest under the DMTS and FCN 8-SD procedures and largest under the FCN 8 and RA procedures. The differential effects obtained with molindone under each of these procedures illustrate the need to employ a variety of assays when determining the behavioral actions of neuroleptics. In addition, this battery of behavioral tests may provide a useful tool for assessing the different neurochemical actions of neuroleptic compounds.

Differential effects of neuroleptic drugs on the delayed matching-to-sample performance of pigeons

The effects of clozapine, thiothixene, sulpiride, chlorpromazine and loxapine were examined in pigeons responding under a delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) procedure using 0-, 2- and 8-sec delay intervals. Chlorpromazine (3-100 mg/kg), thiothixene (0.03-1.7 mg/kg), clozapine (0.1-5.6 mg/kg) and loxapine (0.1-10 mg/kg) produced dose-related decreases in the percent of correct responses (accuracy). With the exception of chlorpromazine, the relative magnitude of the accuracy-decreasing effects were unrelated to the length of the delay interval and the nondrug levels of accuracy. In contrast to these accuracy-decreasing effects, sulpiride (3-300 mg/kg) failed to decrease accuracy across the range of doses evaluated. Chlorpromazine, loxapine and clozapine increased response rates at low doses and then decreased response rates as the dose was increased. Thiothixene and sulpiride only decreased response rates in a dose-dependent fashion. The order of potency for the rate-suppressing effects of these drugs was thiothixene greater than clozapine = loxapine greater than chlorpromazine greater than sulpiride. The results of the present investigation suggest that, despite similar dopamine antagonist properties, neuroleptics produce qualitatively different effects in pigeons responding under DMTS procedures.

Effects of buspirone differ from those of gepirone and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on unpunished responding of pigeons

Under several behavioral procedures, such as punished responding and drug discrimination, the effects of the atypical anxiolytic buspirone are similar to those of its analogue gepirone, and to those of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT. Similarities in the effects of these compounds occur despite the fact that buspirone produces strong dopaminergic actions, whereas both gepirone and 8-OH-DPAT effects mainly appear to be serotonergically mediated. When keypeck responding of pigeons was maintained under a multiple 3-min fixed-interval, 30-response fixed ratio schedule of food presentation, responding under both the fixed-interval and fixed-ratio schedules was decreased over a range of buspirone doses (0.3-5.6 mg/kg). As has been reported with many antipsychotic compounds, performance under the fixed-interval schedule was more sensitive to the rate-decreasing effects of buspirone. In contrast, both gepirone (0.03-3.0 mg/kg) and 8-OH-DPAT (0.03-1.0 mg/kg) increased responding under the two schedules. Differences in the effects of buspirone from the other compounds in this study, compared to the similar effects of these drugs obtained using other procedures, emphasize the importance of the specific behavior as a determinant of drug action. The multiple fixed-interval, fixed-ratio schedule may be useful for delineating the relative balance of dopaminergic and serotonergic effects produced by drugs that are less apparent using other behavioral procedures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of clozapine on fixed-consecutive-number responding in rats: a comparison to other neuroleptic drugs

The effects of clozapine and several other neuroleptic drugs were examined in rats responding under fixed-consecutive-number (FCN) schedules with minimum response requirements of 4 and 8. Under these schedules, rats were trained to respond either 8 or more times or 4 or more times on one lever, and then respond once on a second lever. In one component of these schedules, an external discriminative stimulus was presented following the completion of the response requirement on the first lever, whereas no stimulus change was programmed under the other. Under the FCN 8 schedule without the external discriminative stimulus, clozapine produced large dose-dependent decreases in accuracy (percent of reinforced response runs), whereas molindone produced small decreases in accuracy. Neither clozapine or molindone, however, altered accuracy under the FCN 4 without the external discriminative stimulus. Under these same schedules, loxapine, chlorpromazine, haloperidol and thioridazine produced small increases in accuracy at intermediate doses without affecting accuracy at the low and high doses. None of the neuroleptics evaluated produced accuracy-altering effects under the FCN schedules with the external discriminative stimulus. In general, all of these drugs decreased response rates in a dose-dependent fashion. The order of potency for the rate-decreasing effects of these drugs was loxapine greater than haloperidol greater than molindone greater than clozapine = chlorpromazine greater than thioridazine. Thus, the effects of clozapine on accuracy under the FCN schedules without the external discriminative stimulus differed qualitatively from those of other neuroleptic agents.

Effects of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and MK-771 on schedule-controlled behavior of squirrel monkeys, rabbits and pigeons

The effects of TRH (0.001-10.0 mg/kg) and a more potent TRH analog, MK-771 (0.001-5.6 mg/kg), were studied on comparable schedule-controlled performances of squirrel monkeys, rabbits and pigeons. Responding was maintained in the presence of different stimuli by a multiple fixed-ratio (FR), fixed-interval (FI) schedule of food presentation (monkeys and pigeons) or 0.25% saccharin solution (rabbits). Generally, TRH and MK-771 produced decreases in responding under both schedules and in all three species. TRH and MK-771 were roughly equipotent in the squirrel monkey, whereas in the pigeon and rabbit MK-771 was approximately 20 times more potent than TRH in decreasing responding to 50 percent of control levels. The duration of action of doses of TRH and MK-771 that reduced responding to 50 percent of control was approximately 3 hr in the squirrel monkey; recovery of performance occurred twice as fast under the FR schedules. With the pigeon, TRH effects that produced 50 percent decreases in responding lasted over 6 hours, whereas behaviorally comparable doses of MK-771 lasted about 4 hours. With few exceptions, TRH and MK-771 appear to produce similar effects of schedule-controlled behavioral performances of the squirrel monkey, rabbit and pigeon. Compared to the effects of other behaviorally-active substances under these procedures, TRH and MK-771 exert a distinctive array of effects.