Evaluation of surgical staging in stage I low malignant potential ovarian tumors

Impact of surgical restaging on recurrence in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The benefits of restaging surgery for patients with a borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) discovered on initial surgery are debatable. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the role of restaging surgery on recurrence in patients with BOTs.

STUDY DESIGN

We systematically reviewed published studies comparing restaging surgery and incomplete surgery in BOT patients from January 1985 to December 2017. Endpoints were recurrence and mortality rates. Study design features that possibly affected participant selection, reporting of recurrence and death, and manuscript publication were assessed. For pooled estimates of the effect of restaging surgery on recurrence, fixed-effect meta-analytical models were used.

RESULTS

Of the 577 articles initially selected, four retrospective observational studies (Restaging group: 166 patients; Non-Restaging group: 394 patients) met our research criteria. No significant differences in terms of recurrence between the two groups were observed (pooled Peto Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.88; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-1.92). The number of deaths was insufficient for statistical analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis based on retrospective studies, suggests that restaging surgery does not significantly reduce recurrence in patients with BOT.

[Borderline Ovarian Tumours: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Therapeutic Management of Early Stages]

OBJECTIVES

To provide guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (CNGOF), based on the best evidence available, concerning early stage borderline ovarian tumors (BOT).

METHODS

Bibliographical search in French and English languages by consultation of Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, and international databases.

RESULTS

Considering management of early stage BOT, if surgery is possible without a risk of tumor rupture, the laparoscopic approach is recommended compared to laparotomy (Grade C). In BOT, it is recommended to take all the measures to avoid tumor rupture, including the peroperative decision of laparoconversion (Grade C). In BOT, extraction of the surgical specimen using an endoscopic bag is recommended (Grade C). In case of early stage, uni or bilateral BOT, suspected in preoperative imaging in a postmenopausal patient, bilateral adnexectomy is recommended (Grade B). In cases of bilateral BOT and desire of fertility preservation, a bilateral cystectomy is recommended (Grade B). In case of mucinous BOT and desire of fertility preservation, it is recommended to perform a unilateral adnexectomy (Grade C). In case of endometrioid BOT and desire of fertility preservation, it is not possible to establish a recommendation of treatment choice between cystectomy and unilateral adnexectomy. In case of mucinous BOT at definitive histological analysis in a woman of childbearing age who had an initial cystectomy, surgical revision for unilateral adnexectomy is recommended (Grade C). In the case of serous BOT with definitive histological analysis in a woman of childbearing age who has had an initial cystectomy, it is not recommended to repeat surgery for adnexectomy in the absence of residual suspicious lesion during initial surgery and/or on postoperative imaging (referent ultrasound or pelvic MRI) (Grade C). An omentectomy is recommended for complete initial surgical staging when BOT is diagnosed on extemporaneous analysis or suspected on preoperative radiological elements (Grade B). There is no data in the literature to recommend the type of omentectomy to be performed. If restaging surgery is decided for a presumed early stage BOT, an omentectomy is recommended (Grade B). Multiple peritoneal biopsies are recommended for complete initial surgical staging when BOT is diagnosed on extemporaneous or suspected on preoperative radiological elements (Grade C). In case of restaging surgery for a presumed early stage BOT, exploration of the abdominal cavity should be complete and peritoneal biopsies should be performed on suspicious areas or systematically (Grade C). A primary peritoneal cytology is recommended in order to achieve complete initial surgical staging when BOT is suspected on preoperative radiological elements (Grade C). In case of restaging surgery for presumed early stage BOT, a first peritoneal cytology is recommended (Grade C). For early serous or mucinous BOT, it is not recommended to perform a systematic hysterectomy (Grade C). For early stage endometrioid BOT, and in the absence of a desire to maintain fertility, hysterectomy is recommended for initial surgery or if restaging surgery is indicated (Grade C). For endometrioid-type early stage BOT, if there is a desire for fertility preservation, the uterus may be retained subject to good evaluation of the endometrium by imaging and endometrial sampling (Grade C). In case of surgery (initial or restaging if indicated) for early stage BOT, it is recommended to evaluate the macroscopic appearance of the appendix (Grade B). In case of surgery (initial or restaging if indicated) for early stage BOT, appendectomy is recommended only in case of macroscopically pathological appearance of the appendix (Grade C). Pelvic and lumbar aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended for initial surgery or restaging surgery for early stage BOT regardless of histologic type (Grade C). In case of BOT diagnosed on definitive histology, the indication of restaging surgery should be discussed in Multidisciplinary Collaborative Meeting. For presumed early stage BOT, it is recommended to use the laparoscopic approach to perform restaging surgery (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended for serous BOT with micropapillary appearance and unsatisfactory abdominal cavity inspection during initial surgery (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended in case of mucinous BOT if only a cystectomy has been performed or the appendix has not been visualized, then a unilateral adnexectomy will be performed (Grade C). If a restaging surgery is decided in the management of a presumed early stage BOT, the actions to be carried out are as follows: a peritoneal cytology (Grade C), an omentectomy (there is no data in the literature recommending the type of omentectomy to be performed) (Grade B), a complete exploration of the abdominal cavity with peritoneal biopsies on suspect areas or systematically (Grade C), visualization of the appendix± the appendectomy in case of pathological macroscopic appearance (Grade C), unilateral adnexectomy in case of mucinous TFO (Grade C).

Identification of factors that impact recurrence in patients with borderline ovarian tumors

Background

The lack of consensus around best practices for management of borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) is, in part, to the lack of available data and of clarity in interpreting relationships among various factors that impact outcomes. The objective of this study was to identify clinicopathological factors that impact prognosis of patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) and to address features of this disease with the objective of providing clarity in decision making around management of BOT.

Results

A total of 178 BOT patients were included in this study, with a median age of 43 years and a median follow-up time of 37 months. Thirty-two (18.0%) recurrences and 5 (2.8%) deaths were observed in this study group. Multivariate analysis showed that fertility-preserving surgery (P = 0.0223 for bilateral cystectomy) and invasive implants (P = 0.0030) were significantly associated with worse PFS, whereas lymphadenectomy (P = 0.0129) was related to improved PFS. No factors were found to be associated with OS due to the limited number of deaths. In addition, patients with serous BOT more commonly had abnormal levels of CA125, while patients with mucinous BOT more commonly had abnormal levels of CEA. Patients with abnormal levels of CA125, or CA19-9, or HE4 had significantly larger tumor sizes.

Conclusions

Our study reveals the impact of certain types of fertility-preserving surgery, lymphadenectomy and invasive implants on PFS of BOT patients. Blood cancer markers may be associated with histology and size of BOT. Our findings may assist in selection of optimum treatment for BOT patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13048-017-0316-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Staging procedures in patients with mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary do not reveal peritoneal or omental disease

OBJECTIVES

Staging in case of a borderline tumor of the ovary (BOT) is a controversial issue. Upstaging is not uncommon, but this occurs especially with presumed stage I serous borderline tumors. There are only a few documented cases of BOTs of non-serous histology that were not confined to the ovary. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of non-invasive and invasive implants in the omentum and other (extra)pelvic peritoneal surfaces in patients with a mucinous BOT (mBOT).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in three hospitals in the Netherlands. All patients with a histopathological diagnosis of mBOT diagnosed from January 1st 1990 to December 1st 2015 were identified and included when the inclusion criteria were met.

RESULTS

In total, 74 patients were included. Of these 74 patients, 46 (62.2%) underwent a staging procedure. In 12 (26.1%) patients, only omental tissue was obtained, in 32 (69.6%) patients, omental tissue and peritoneal biopsies were obtained and in two (4.3%) patients, only peritoneal biopsies were obtained. No implants were seen upon microscopic examination in any of the patients. Two patients (3%) developed a recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Because no extra-ovarian disease was found, staging procedures in the case of an mBOT may be omitted. However, the actual perioperative decision for staging or not should be taken in the context of a frozen section diagnosis, which is not always accurate and straightforward. Recurrence with malignant disease is rare after mBOT. The value of post-treatment surveillance seems limited after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Management, prognosis and reproductive outcomes of borderline ovarian tumor relapse during pregnancy: from diagnosis to potential treatment options

BACKGROUND

fertility sparing surgery is the first option for treatment of childbearing age women affected by borderline ovarian tumor (BOT). This review put in evidence the benefits and the risks of conservative surgery procedure. Moreover, the literature review is aimed to analyze the possibility of fertility sparing surgery in BOTs and to define a standard treatment in the management of this pathology during pregnancy.

METHODS

systematic analysis of the relevant literature for fertility sparing during pregnancy for BOT, accessed through MEDLINE (1982-2015), bibliographies, and interactions with investigators. The data were assimilated into a rigorous and objective contemporary description, enriched by prospective, controlled, and evidence-based studies.

RESULTS

there are not many studies about BOT during pregnancy. It can reasonably assumed that after the diagnosis of a suspected BOT during the third trimester of pregnancy, an attitude of close surveillance could be adopted. To the best of our knowledge, we report the only case in literature focused about the treatment and management of borderline ovarian tumor relapse detected during pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

basing on our experience and on literature reported, the conservative management of BOT during gestation up to delivery could be considered feasible. The conservative debulking surgery should be performed at the time of cesarean section in a third referral center for gynecologic oncology.

New Pointers for Surgical Staging of Borderline Ovarian Tumors

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) is similar to that of ovarian cancer apart from lymphadenectomy. However, the complete procedure including peritoneal washing, infracolic omentectomy and random peritoneal biopsies remains a subject of controversy especially in presumed early stage BOTs. To evaluate the prognostic value of complete surgical staging on recurrence rates, recurrence free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in a multicentre cohort of BOTs.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentre study included 428 patients with BOTs diagnosed from January 1980 to December 2008. Survival estimates were based on Kaplan-Meier calculations and RFS defined as the time from the date of surgery to the date of recurrence.

RESULTS

The median time of follow-up was 94.9 months (range: 60.00-207.3). The overall recurrence rate was 23.8 %. There was no difference in 5-year RFS between patients with and without complete surgical staging 78.1 % (95 % CI 68.9-88.6) and 70.9 % (95 % CI 64.6-77.8), (p = 0.0806). In the whole cohort, 5-year OS was higher for patients with complete surgical staging 98.4 % (95 % CI 96.8-1.0) and 93.8 % (95 % CI 88.1-1), (p = 0.0182) but this difference was not significant for patients with FIGO stage I 98.6 % (95 % CI 96.7-1) and 92.7 % (95 % CI 83.4-1.0), p = 0.1275, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete staging surgery should be considered as a cornerstone treatment for patients with advanced stage BOT but not for those with stage I disease.

A meta-analysis on the impact of platinum-based adjuvant treatment on the outcome of borderline ovarian tumors with invasive implants

BACKGROUND

Treatment of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) remains contentious, and there is no consensus regarding therapy for BOTs with invasive implants (BOTi). The benefits of platinum-based adjuvant treatment were evaluated in patients with BOTi at primary diagnosis.

METHODS

The PubMed database was systematically searched for articles using the following terms: ((borderline) OR (low malignant potential) AND (ovarian)) AND ((tumor) OR (cancer)) AND (invasive implants) AND ((follow-up) OR (survival) OR (treatment) OR (chemotherapy) OR (adjuvant treatment) OR (surgery) OR (surgical treatment)).

RESULTS

We identified 27 articles including 3,124 patients, 181 with invasive implants. All studies provided information regarding mortality or recurrence rates. Central pathological examination was performed in 19 studies. Eight studies included more than 75% stage I patients; 7 included only advanced-stage patients, and 14 included only serous BOT. The pooled recurrence estimates for both treatment groups (adjuvant treatment: 44.0%, upfront surgery: 21.3%) did not differ significantly (p = .114). A meta-analysis of the 6 studies providing separate mortality data for both treatment groups favored surgical treatment only, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (.05 < p < .1; odds ratio: 0.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.09-1.71; p = .086). We were unable to pool the results of the included studies because not all studies registered events in both treatment groups. Egger's regression indicated low asymmetry of the studies (p = .39), and no heterogeneity was found (I(2) = 0%).

CONCLUSION

We did not find evidence supporting platinum-based adjuvant therapy for BOT with invasive implants.

The value of random biopsies, omentectomy, and hysterectomy in operations for borderline ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVE

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are treated surgically like malignant ovarian tumors with hysterectomy, salpingectomy, omentectomy, and multiple random peritoneal biopsies in addition to removal of the ovaries. It is, however, unknown how often removal of macroscopically normal-appearing tissues leads to the finding of microscopic disease. To evaluate the value of random biopsies, omentectomy, and hysterectomy in operations for BOT, the macroscopic and microscopic findings in a cohort of these patients were reviewed retrospectively.

MATERIALS

Women treated for BOT at Odense University Hospital from 2007 to 2011 were eligible for this study. Data were extracted from electronic records. Intraoperative assessment of tumor spread (macroscopic disease) and the microscopic evaluation of removed tissues were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

The study included 75 patients, 59 (78.7%) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I, 9 (12%) in stage II, and 7 (9.3%) in stage III. The histologic subtypes were serous (68%), mucinous (30.7%), and Brenner type (1.3%). Macroscopically radical surgery was performed in 62 patients (82.7%), and 46 (61.3%) received complete staging. The surgeon's identification of macroscopic tumor spread to the contralateral ovary and the peritoneum had a sensitivity of 88% and 69.2% and a specificity of 90.2% and 92.5%, respectively. The macroscopic assessment of the uterine surface, the omentum, and the pelvic and para-aortal lymph nodes was not a good predictor of microscopic disease. During follow-up, 4 patients (5.3%) relapsed with no relation to surgical radicality or the extent of staging procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Ovaries and peritoneal surfaces with a macroscopically normal appearance rarely contain a microscopic focus of BOT.

Borderline tumours of the ovary, current controversies regarding their diagnosis and treatment

Borderline ovarian tumours generally affect women of reproductive age. The positive prognosis is related to the fact that over 80% of cases are diagnosed at an early stage of the disease. Although radical surgery is the standard of care for this disease, fertility-sparing surgery can be performed in selected cases. Since it was first described in 1929, the knowledge of the molecular and histologic characteristics has been significantly improved. In this review, advances in the clinical behaviour, pathologic characteristics, prognostics factors, and different strategies of treatment are discussed.

Borderline ovarian tumour: pathological diagnostic dilemma and risk factors for invasive or lethal recurrence

By comparison with ovarian carcinomas, borderline ovarian tumours are characterised clinically by superior overall survival, even in women with peritoneal spread. In this Review, we aimed to clarify the histological and clinical factors potentially defining a high-risk group in whom disease is likely to evolve to invasive disease. Invasive peritoneal implants (in serous borderline ovarian tumours) and residual disease after surgery were the two factors clearly identified. Other factors are controversial owing to increased risk of invasive recurrence: micropapillary patterns in serous borderline ovarian tumour, intraepithelial carcinoma in mucinous lesions, stromal microinvasion in serous lesions, and use of cystectomy in mucinous borderline ovarian tumours. The pathologist has a pivotal role in assessment of the borderline nature of ovarian tumours and in identification of high-risk criteria, most of which are histological. But, reproducibility of the histological interpretation of some of these potential criteria--eg, classification of peritoneal implants (particularly in desmoplastic subtype), stromal microinvasion, micropapillary patterns, and intraepithelial carcinoma in mucinous borderline ovarian tumours--remains unclear, and should be investigated.

The role of restaging borderline ovarian tumors: single institution experience and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are a histological category of epithelial ovarian tumors and 70% of them are early diagnosed (stage I). Since early stage is the most important prognostic factor, restaging procedure could be justified. This study aims to evaluate the role of restaging surgery in the management of patients with borderline ovarian tumors referred to our Institution after being incompletely surgically staged in other hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with BOT who were referred to our centre to undergo restaging procedure. From December 1995 to May 2008, 186 patients were treated for BOT and 70 patients met the inclusion criteria. Data collected included patients' age, primary and re-staging surgery details, FIGO stage after first and second procedure, pathological findings, and follow-up data.

RESULTS

FIGO stage after primary surgery was IA in 46 patients (68.6%), IB in 7 patients (10.4%), IC in 12 patients (17.9%, 6 due to ruptured cyst), IIA in 1 patient (1.4%), IIB in 1 patient (1.4%), III B in 2 patients (2.8%), and IIIC in 1 patient (1.4%). Among stage I patients (representing 97% of all patients), 12.3% (8 patients) were up-staged. The upstaging rate among serous tumors was 16.2%, and 4% among mucinous tumors. The mean follow-up time was 60.4 months from restaging surgery (SD 30.6 months). We observed 8 primary recurrences of the disease and 3 second recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in terms of overall survival between patients who were upstaged and those who were not. Restaging procedure does not seem to have a significant impact on the management of patients diagnosed with borderline ovarian tumors, especially in mucinous subtype and apparent FIGO stage higher than I.

Systematic evaluation of the intraoperative tumor pattern in patients with borderline tumor of the ovary

OBJECTIVE

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are rare entities with excellent prognosis depending on tumor stage and presence of invasive implants. There are limited data regarding the intraoperative tumor pattern, the actual base of optimal treatment planning. We conducted a systematic evaluation of the macroscopic and microscopic tumor spreads in patients with BOTs with special focus on the diagnosis of invasive and noninvasive lesions.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and July 2008, data of patients with BOTs were evaluated using a systematic and validated documentation tool (intraoperative mapping of ovarian cancer). Surgical outcome and pathological findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients underwent surgery for BOT. Mean (SD) age was 47.76 (15.9) years. In 6 patients (11.8%), surgery was performed for recurrence. Complete tumor resection was achieved in 47 patients (92.15%), whereas mean (SD) operative time was 126.34 (73.4) minutes. Pathologic evaluation identified 12 patients (23.53%) with mucinous and 39 patients (76.47%) with serous histologic diagnoses. Twenty-nine (56.86%) and 22 patients (43.13%) were found to have unilateral and bilateral ovarian involvements, respectively. Sixteen patients (31.37%) presented extraovarian involvement into the peritoneum (23.5%), omentum (17.7%), uterus (7.84%), sigmoid (7.8%), lymph nodes (7.8%), ileum (3.9%), mesentery (5.9%), and appendix (1.96%). Twenty patients (39.2%) had implants; of those, 9 (17.64%) and 11 patients (21.6%) have invasive and noninvasive lesions, respectively. Eight of the 9 patients with positive peritoneal cytology were associated with the presence of peritoneal implants; 3 of them with invasive character.

CONCLUSIONS

Borderline ovarian tumors require a systematic surgical evaluation to verify or exclude extrapelvic tumor lesions and allow further clinical relevant differentiation between invasive and noninvasive implants.

Laparoscopic fertility-sparing staging in unexpected early stage ovarian malignancies

OBJECTIVE

To assess feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing laparoscopic staging in women affected by unexpected ovarian cancer desiring to preserve their fertility.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

University clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Twenty-seven patients already operated on elsewhere for a presumably benign ovarian cyst.

INTERVENTION(S)

Laparoscopic fertility-sparing staging operations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Perioperative and survival data, reproductive outcome.

RESULT(S)

Histologic findings after first surgery: 12 low malignant potential neoplasms, 11 invasive epithelial ovarian carcinomas,1 sex-cord stromal, and 3 germ cell neoplasms. Fertility-sparing staging consisted of exploration of the peritoneal cavity, peritoneal washing cytology, multiple peritoneal biopsies, omolateral adnexectomy (except in borderline tumors), omentectomy, omolateral or bilateral pelvic and aortic lymph node sampling (except in borderline tumors, well differentiated, mucinous, and granulosa cell (GC) neoplasms), endometrial biopsy, appendectomy in mucinous type. Overall, seven patients (26%) were upstaged. Six patients received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Two term pregnancies occurred. After a median follow-up of 20 months all patients are alive; one patient has FIGO stage Ic clear cell carcinoma, which recurred 8 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION(S)

Laparoscopic fertility-sparing staging in early ovarian malignancies is feasible and safe in selected and counseled patients and should be performed in experienced gynecological oncology centers trained in endoscopic procedures.

Laparoscopy in the treatment of ovarian tumours of low malignant potential

Laparoscopy is increasingly used by gynaecologists for the investigation of adnexal masses. Uncertainty exists whether ovarian tumours of low malignant potential can effectively be treated by laparoscopy, whether staging bears a benefit for all patients, whether port-site metastases are a problem and how long patients need to be followed up after surgery. This review summarises the evidence to address these important questions.

Laparoscopic restaging of borderline ovarian tumors

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and relevance of laparoscopic restaging surgery for women with borderline ovarian tumors.

METHODS

From March 2001 to February 2006, 42 women referred for borderline ovarian tumors after laparoscopy or laparotomy underwent a laparoscopic restaging operation. Of these women, 37 (88%) had undergone conservative surgery including unilateral cystectomy (n = 16), bilateral cystectomy (n = 1), and unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (n = 20). The remaining five women (12%) had undergone radical surgery, including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) (n = 4) and hysterectomy with BSO (n = 1). Intraoperative rupture occurred in 13 cases.

RESULTS

All 42 restaging operations were performed via the laparoscopic approach. There were no intraoperative complications, no laparoconversions, and no postoperative complications. Laparoscopic restaging identified two persistent borderline ovarian tumors (12%) in women who had initially undergone cystectomy. Seven women were upstaged (16.6%) because of positive cytology (n = 2), peritoneal biopsy (n = 2), or omentum (n = 3). Among the 28 women with initial Federation International of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage Ia disease, the final stage was Ia for 24 women, Ib for 2 women, IIIa for 1 woman, and IIIc for 1 woman. Among the 12 women with initial stage Ic disease, 11 kept the same stage and 1 was upstaged to IIIc. The woman with initial stage IIa disease was upstaged to IIb, and the woman with initial stage IIc disease was upstaged to IIIc. The risk of upstaging was significantly higher among women with serous borderline tumors. Upstaging occurred in women with both initial stages I and II disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic restaging operations for women with borderline ovarian tumors. Cystectomy was associated with a risk of persistent lesions. The risk of upstaging was higher for women with serous borderline ovarian tumors and women with initial FIGO stage I or II disease.

Is complete surgical staging necessary in patients with stage I mucinous epithelial ovarian tumors?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact on prognosis of complete surgical staging in patients with stage I mucinous epithelial ovarian tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients with stage I mucinous epithelial tumors apparently confined to ovaries treated in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, from 1990 through 2005.

RESULTS

Of 264 patients treated during this time period, 62 (23.5%) had complete and 202 (76.5%) had incomplete initial surgical staging. No patient with clinically apparent stage I borderline tumor was upstaged, 5 of 85 patients with invasive mucinous cancer was upstaged due to positive peritoneal cytology and there was no upstaged patient owing to occult lymph node metastasis. No recurrence was observed in the completely staged and 2 (1.4%) in the incompletely staged group among the patients with borderline tumor developed relapse. Three (11.5%) recurrences in the completely staged and four (6.8%) in the incompletely staged group among the patients with invasive cancer were observed, and the difference was not statistically significant. We also observed no significant differences between two groups in progression-free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Complete surgical staging could probably be omitted in patients with stage I mucinous epithelial tumors.

Borderline tumours of the ovary and fertility

Standard management of borderline ovarian tumours (BOT) is historically radical and based on hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and peritoneal staging. But, as 1/3 of BOTs are diagnosed in patients aged less than 40 years, treatments preserving fertility-potential (with preservation of the uterus and at least part of one ovary) has seen great developments in the last decade. Such treatments increase the rate of recurrences (between 15% and 35% depending on the type of conservative surgery), but without any impact on patient survival as most recurrent diseases are of the borderline type, easily curable and with excellent prognosis. The spontaneous pregnancy rate is nearly 50%. In case of persistent infertility, it seems that the use of ovarian induction or in vitro fertilization procedures could be proposed in selected cases. Follow-up is essential and based on clinical examination and routine ultrasonography. The interest of completion surgery (removal of the retained ovary) in patients who obtained pregnancy remains debated. In conclusion, conservative management of at least part of one ovary and uterus could be safely proposed at least to patients with early stage BOT, in order to preserve fertility-potential. The rate of recurrence is increased but without any impact on survival.

Serous and mucinous borderline (low malignant potential) tumors of the ovary

The prognosis for stage I serous borderline ovarian tumors (SBOTs) is thought to be excellent, despite rare, late recurrences. The behavior of advanced-stage SBOTs primarily depends on the invasiveness vs noninvasiveness of associated extraovarian implants. Pelvic and abdominal lymph node involvement and foci of microinvasion do not seem to adversely affect prognosis. Serous tumors with a micropapillary and/or cribriform growth pattern seem to be more frequently bilateral and exophytic and manifest at an advanced stage with a higher incidence of invasive implants than typical SBOTs. Molecular data suggest that such tumors may represent an intermediate stage in the typical SBOT-invasive low-grade serous carcinoma progression. Limited experience with endocervical (müllerian)-type mucinous borderline tumors shows a possible relation to SBOTs in clinicopathologic features and biologic behavior Intestinal-type mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (I-MBOTs) and well-differentiated mucinous carcinomas manifest at stage I in most cases; the prognosis is excellent. Mucinous tumors associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei are almost always secondary to similar tumors of the appendix or other gastrointestinal sites and should not be diagnosed as high-stage I-MBOTs. Rare primary ovarian mucinous tumors associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei are those arising in mature cystic teratomas. Advanced-stage ovarian mucinous carcinomas typically show frank, infiltrative-type invasion; the prognosis is poor.

Fertility and recurrence results of conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the fertility and recurrence outcomes in women treated with fertility-sparing surgery for borderline ovarian tumors.

METHODS

A total of 142 patients with borderline ovarian tumors managed surgically from 1993 to 2004 were identified from gynecologic oncology and pathology files of SSK Ankara Maternity and Women's Health Teaching Hospital. Sixty-two of those patients who had conservative surgery were eligible for the study. Information was acquired by retrospective medical record review and patient interview.

RESULTS

The observed recurrence rates after radical and fertility-sparing surgery were 0.0% and 6.5%, respectively. Four patients from the conservative surgery group developed recurrence, in contrast to none of the patients from the non-conservative surgery group. No disease-related deaths occurred in any group. In the conservatively managed group, ten women had successful pregnancies, with a total of 10 live births and 3 abortions. The mean duration of follow-up for the conservative surgery group was 44.3 months (range, 3-128).

CONCLUSION

Fertility-sparing surgery for borderline ovarian tumors should be considered for women in the reproductive age group who desire preservation of fertility. Recurrence is noted significantly more often after this type of treatment and close follow-up is needed to detect recurrent disease.

The Role of Laparoscopy in Ovarian Tumors of Low Malignant Potential and Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer

Although it is feasible today to perform laparoscopic surgical staging and treatment of ovarian low malignant potential tumors and early-stage ovarian cancer safely, it is still generally agreed that a patient with ovarian cancer should have a laparotomy. Concerns related to laparoscopy in managing gynecologic malignancy include the accuracy of intraoperative diagnosis, inadequate resection, significance of tumor spillage, improper or delay in surgical staging, delay in therapy, and the possibility of port-site metastasis. On the other hand, laparoscopy has the advantages of being a minimally invasive surgery, with shorter hospitalization, decreased postoperative pain, and quicker return to normal daily activities. We review the current literature discussing the consequences of laparoscopic surgery in ovarian tumors of low malignant potential and early-stage ovarian cancer.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to list the concerns related to laparoscopic management of ovarian malignancies, to outline the accuracy of the diagnosis of low malignant potential (LMP) ovarian tumors on frozen section, and to summarize the data on the effect of capsule rupture on overall prognosis for patients with ovarian cancer.

Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of a French multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy in the management of women with borderline ovarian tumors remains controversial. We therefore evaluated the adequacy of initial laparoscopic staging according to FIGO guidelines, by comparison with laparotomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a French retrospective multicenter study of 358 women with borderline ovarian tumors, we compared epidemiological characteristics, sonographic findings, serum tumor marker levels, and surgical and histological parameters between women undergoing laparoscopy and women undergoing laparotomy.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-nine (41.6%) of the 358 women underwent laparoscopy. Mean age, mean gestity and parity, and mean tumor size were higher in the laparotomy group. Forty-two women (28.2%) underwent laparoconversion, mainly for suspected ovarian cancer or large tumor volume. Conservative treatment and cyst rupture were more frequent in the laparoscopy group than in the laparoconversion and laparotomy groups (P < 0.0001). The rate of complete staging was lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparoconversion and laparotomy groups (P < 0.0001), with no difference between these latter two groups. No difference in the recurrence rate was noted between the groups, but a higher recurrence rate was observed after conservative treatment (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors is associated with a higher rate of cyst rupture and incomplete staging. Recurrence was more frequent after conservative treatment. Whatever the surgical route, the rate of complete initial staging was low, emphasizing the need to respect treatment guidelines for borderline ovarian tumors.

Impact of surgical staging in patients with macroscopic “stage I” ovarian borderline tumours: analysis of a continuous series of 101 cases

The aim of this study was to assess the patient's clinical outcome following complete or incomplete surgical staging in cases treated for an early stage low-malignant-potential ovarian tumour (LMPOT). One-hundred and one patients treated between 1965 and 1998 for a early stage I LMPOT were reviewed according to whether the initial surgical staging was complete (Group 1/defined by peritoneal cytology + peritoneal biopsies + infracolic omentectomy) or incomplete (Group 2/omission of at least one of the peritoneal staging procedures described above). Complete and incomplete surgical stagings were carried out in 48 (48%) and 53 (52%) patients, respectively. Four (8%) LMPOT recurrences were observed in Group 2, all following conservative management, but there were no recurrences in Group 1. No relapses with invasive carcinoma or peritoneal disease and no tumour-related deaths were observed. The absence of complete peritoneal staging in patients with an apparent "stage I" LMPOT increased the recurrence rate. However, this surgical restaging (in cases of incomplete initial surgery) does not modify the survival of patients with apparent "stage I" LMPOT misdiagnosed during the initial surgery. This procedure could probably be omitted: (1) if the peritoneum is clearly reported as "normal" during the initial surgery; (2) in the absence of a micropapillary pattern; and (3) if the patient agrees to be carefully followed-up.

Advanced-stage serous borderline tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathological study of 49 cases

There is controversy about patient outcomes and pathological parameters of prognostic significance in patients with stage II or stage III ovarian serous borderline tumors. Forty-nine cases of stage II and III ovarian serous borderline tumors were identified on review of the medical records at Vancouver Hospital and British Columbia Cancer Agency for the period from 1979 to 1996. Pathological features assessed included presence of micropapillary architecture, tumor cell DNA content (ploidy), and characteristics of the extraovarian implants, including invasiveness and mitotic activity. Clinical follow-up information (3-17 years of follow-up) was obtained for 48 patients. Fifteen patients had stage II tumors and 34 had stage III tumors. Fourteen patients experienced tumor recurrence 1 to 8 (mean 3.5) years after presentation and of these, six patients died of disease (2, 3, 4, 7, 10, and 11 years after presentation). Patients with gross residual disease, as assessed by the surgeon, more frequently experienced a recurrence compared with patients without gross residual disease, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (0.05<p<0.1). The patients who died of disease all had stage III tumors. Patients with invasive implants had a significantly worse outcome than patients with noninvasive implants (p<0.005). Other pathological features (ploidy, micropapillary architecture, invasiveness of implants, mitotic activity of implants) were not significantly predictive of tumor recurrence or death. No single pathological feature or combination of features was present in all patients who subsequently died of disease. In conclusion, the prognosis for patients with advanced-stage serous borderline tumors in this population-based study is very favorable, with only six patients ultimately dying of progressive disease. The combination of stage (stage III) and invasiveness of extraovarian implants identifies a small subset of patients with advanced-stage serous borderline tumors with a significantly worse prognosis, who may benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Evaluation of restaging in clinical stage 1A low malignant potential ovarian tumours

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to evaluate whether restaging clinical stage 1A low malignant potential (LMP) tumours previously incompletely staged in a non-gynaecology oncology centre yields useful information for management and prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was undertaken of all patients with LMP tumours treated at the Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer (QCGC) from 1982-2000.

RESULTS

Fifty-six (69%) of the 81 patients referred with a provisional stage 1A diagnosis underwent a second operation for staging purposes. Four (7%) out of the 56 patients who underwent restaging had their tumours upstaged. A single patient out of the 25 patients who did not undergo restaging had disease recurrence and died as a result. The mean follow-up for all patients in the study was 60 months.

CONCLUSION

It is hard to justify routine surgical restaging for patients with a LMP ovarian tumour apparently confined to a single ovary At the very least, hundreds of patients with clinical stage 1A tumours will need to be restaged before a single patient will have data that will change management. Consequently the morbidity of routine restaging is difficult to justify for such a small clinical gain.

Clinical management potential tumours of low malignancy

Approximately 3000 American women are diagnosed with borderline ovarian tumours annually. Common signs and symptoms include abdominal/pelvic pain and a palpable adnexal mass. Pelvic sonography may be helpful, although not specific, in the diagnosis. Serum CA 125 is abnormal in only about 50% of patients. Primary surgery is the principal treatment; it consists of resection of the primary tumour(s) (frequently in the form of fertility-sparing surgery), frozen-section analysis and consideration of comprehensive surgical staging. The role of surgical staging remains unclear; further research is necessary. For patients with stage I disease, surgery alone is the standard. For patients with stage II-IV disease (with non-invasive or invasive peritoneal implants), the role of post-operative therapy remains unclear. Approximately 20-30% of the latter will relapse, frequently after several years. Most so-called recurrences are low-grade carcinomas. Potential predictive or prognostic factors include age, FIGO stage, residual disease and the micropapillary pattern. After fertility-sparing surgery, most patients retain normal reproductive function.

Fertility and tumor recurrence rate after conservative laparoscopic management of young women with early-stage borderline ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic conservative surgery in young women with borderline ovarian tumors who want to preserve their childbearing potential, and to assess whether pregnancy influences the recurrence rate during the follow-up evaluation period.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Center for Reconstructive Pelvic Endosurgery, Reproductive Medicine Unit, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Italy.

PATIENT(S)

Nineteen women (mean age 27.4 +/- 4.7) with borderline ovarian tumors who underwent laparoscopy between January 1995 and January 1998. All of the women wanted to preserve their fertility.

INTERVENTION(S)

A standardized conservative laparoscopic approach and a strict follow-up schedule.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

A complete preoperative examination.

RESULT(S)

Follow-up evaluations (mean 42 +/- 19 months) were made available to all patients. Among 19 patients, 10 attempted pregnancy and 6 conceived spontaneously. All six pregnancies went to term and the disease did not affect the gestation or the follow-up period after the pregnancy (24.5 +/- 15.7 months).

CONCLUSION(S)

Conservative laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors is a potentially safe alternative in young women who want to retain their childbearing potential. Fertility and pregnancy outcome remain excellent in these women. Our preliminary data seem to indicate that the recurrence rate after pregnancy is not influenced by this approach.

Surgery for borderline tumor of the ovary

The five-year survival for women with Stage I borderline tumors is about 95% to 97%, but because of late recurrence the 10-year survival is only 70% to 95%. The five-year survival for Stage II-III patients is 65% to 87%. A more correct staging procedure, classification of true serous implants, and agreement on how the presence of gelatinous ascites in mucinous tumors contributes to cancer stage might change the distribution of stage and survival data by stage for women with borderline tumors in the future. Independent prognostic factors for patients with borderline tumors without residual tumor after primary surgery are: DNA ploidy, morphometry, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, histologic type, and age. Different types of surgery and chemotherapy were not independent prognostic factors. Questions which should be addressed include the following: 1) Have patients with borderline tumors been over treated in general, and how should these patients be treated? 2) In which group of patients is fertility-sparing surgery advisable? 3) Do patients with borderline tumors benefit from adjuvant treatment? And 4) How is the high-risk patient defined?

Contemporary surgical management of borderline ovarian tumors: a survey of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review the current practice patterns regarding the surgical management of borderline ovarian tumors.

METHODS

A one-page survey was mailed to the members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (SGO), using the directory of the Society. The survey addressed the demographics of the respondent and the recommended staging procedure for presumed early-stage disease.

RESULTS

Of the 660 surveys mailed, 274 (42%) were returned. Ninety-seven percent (267/274) of respondents advocate surgical staging. Of this group, 96% (257/267) perform peritoneal washings, 97% (259/267) sample the omentum, and 92% (245/267) submit random peritoneal biopsies. Eighty-eight percent (235/267) perform lymph node sampling: paraaortic biopsies by 89% (210/235) and pelvic biopsies by 97% (228/235). Of this latter group, 91% sample the external iliac chain, 82% submit hypogastric nodal tissue, and 70% remove obturator lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

Diversity exists in the surgical management of borderline ovarian tumors among members of the SGO who responded to this survey. Efforts to ensure a consistent approach to the management of borderline ovarian tumors are warranted.

Ovarian serous borderline tumors: a critical review of the literature with emphasis on prognostic indicators

BACKGROUND

The behavior of ovarian serous borderline tumors (SBTs) and significance of various prognostic factors are unclear and difficult to evaluate because of inconsistencies and confusion in the literature. Recent studies have suggested that the morphological features of the primary tumor (presence or absence of micropapillary features) and the peritoneal "implants" (presence or absence of invasive features) can reliably subclassify SBTs into benign and malignant types. The aim of the current review was to test two hypotheses. First, that the alleged malignant behavior of SBTs is poorly documented, and second, that the morphological features of the primary ovarian tumors and the associated peritoneal implants are sufficient to separate SBTs into benign and malignant types, thereby obviating the need for the category.

METHODS

245 studies reporting approximately 18,000 patients with borderline ovarian tumors were reviewed. After excluding series that lacked clinical follow-up or were not analyzable for other reasons, there remained 97 reports that included 4,129 patients. In addition to recurrences and survival, we evaluated the type of peritoneal implants, microinvasion, lymph node involvement, late recurrences, and progression to carcinoma, as these features have served as the underpinning of the concept of "borderline malignancy" or "low malignant potential."

RESULTS

Among 4,129 patients with SBTs reviewed, the recurrence rate after a mean follow-up of 6.7 years was 0.27% per year for stage I tumors, the disease-free survival was 98.2%, and the overall disease-specific survival rate was 99.5%. For patients with advanced-stage tumors, the recurrence rate was 2.4% per year. However, the majority (69%) of reported recurrences were not pathologically documented, and only 26 cases (8.4% of all recurrences) were documented to have recurred from an adequately sampled ovarian tumor. The most reliable prognostic indicator for advanced stage tumors was the type of peritoneal implant. After 7.4 years of follow-up, the survival of patients with noninvasive peritoneal inplants was 95.3%, as compared with 66% for invasive implants (P < .0001). Microinvasion in the primary ovarian tumor was associated with a 100% survival rate at 6.7 years, and lymph node involvement was associated with a 98% survival rate at 6.5 years. The few reported cases of stage IV disease, progression to invasive carcinoma, and very late (>20 years) recurrences were poorly documented. The survival for all stages among approximately 373 patients in 6 prospective randomized trials followed for a mean of 6.7 years was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Surgical pathological stage and subclassification of extraovarian disease into invasive and noninvasive implants are the most important prognostic indicators for SBTs. Survival for stage I tumors is virtually 100%. Survival for advanced stage tumors with noninvasive implants is 95.3%, whereas survival for tumors with invasive implants is 66%. Invasive implants behave as carcinomas and are most likely metastatic. The precise nature of so-called noninvasive implants is not clear, but they behave in a benign fashion. The presence of a micropapillary architecture in the primary ovarian tumor is a strong predictor of invasive implants. These data support the recommendation that ovarian tumors with a micropapillary architecture be designated "micropapillary serous carcinomas," and those lacking these features, "atypical proliferative serous tumors."

The management of borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary

The histopathological diagnosis and treatment of borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary (BTO) still pose problems to both pathologists and gynecologists. BTO is a disease of younger, fertile females and generally has an excellent prognosis. A minority of patients, however, succumb to this disease. A review of the literature is given addressing aspects of epidemiology, histology, treatment and prognosis, resulting in a proposal for the management of serous and mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary.

Clinical relevance of retroperitoneal involvement from epithelial ovarian tumors of borderline malignancy

Rota SM, Zanetta G, Ieda N, Rossi R, Chiari S, Perego P, Mangioni C. Clinical relevance of retroperitoneal involvement from epithelial ovarian tumors of borderline malignancy. Ovarian tumors of borderline malignancy have an outstanding prognosis. The need for aggressive surgical staging is questionable and the need for retroperitoneal node sampling is debated. From 1982 to 1996, 81 women underwent surgical staging including retroperitoneal sampling. Three patients (3.7%) with serous tumor had microscopic nodal involvement. Retroperitoneal metastases were found in two intraperitoneal stage I tumors and in one stage IIIA tumor. Positive nodes were found in 1/31 (3.2%) women undergoing sampling of para-aortic nodes and in 2/69 (2.8%) women undergoing sampling of pelvic nodes. With a median follow-up of 79 months we observed five recurrences, but none involved the retroperitoneum. The three patients with positive nodes remain alive without disease. Among 236 patients with diagnosis of borderline tumor but without sampling of the nodes, we observed one retroperitoneal recurrence (0.4%) in a serous tumor. There are no indications for retroperitoneal sampling of mucinous borderline tumors. For serous tumors this procedure should only be performed as a part of prospective trials. The clinical relevance of retroperitoneal involvement in borderline tumors appears minimal and does not justify routine aggressive surgery.

Contemporary treatment of borderline ovarian tumors

In conclusion, the prognosis for women with stage I borderline tumors is excellent. Surgery alone is the recommended treatment. For young patients, fertility-sparing surgery is optimal, with a small percentage eventually developing tumor in the contralateral ovary. For patients with advanced stage borderline tumors, 10-30% will relapse and approximately 10% will die of tumor. This risk is clearly higher for those with invasive peritoneal implants. Several controversies exist, including the classification of advanced stage serous borderline tumors and the issue of postoperative treatment. Future studies involving larger series and molecular biomarkers will hopefully elucidate the biologic behavior and optimal therapy for this interesting group of tumors.

The accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors

A retrospective study of 316 ovarian neoplasms which had frozen section evaluation between January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1995 was conducted to determine the accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms. The frozen section results were compared with final diagnoses from paraffin sections. The frozen section diagnosis was accurate in 95.2% of all cases and inaccurate in 4.8%. The positive predictive value of a positive (or malignant) frozen section was 100%, the negative predictive value of a negative (or benign) frozen section was 98.2%. The sensitivity for malignant tumors as 87%. For tumors of borderline malignancy, the sensitivity and specificity were 60% and 98.6% respectively. Of the false negative frozen section diagnoses, 73% (8 cases) occurred in tumors of borderline malignancy. We concluded that with the exception of the sensitivity for the diagnosis of tumors of borderline malignancy, the sensitivity and specificity of frozen section diagnosis for benign and overtly malignant ovarian neoplasms are high.

Low malignant potential ovarian tumours: a review of 175 consecutive cases

Epithelial ovarian tumours of low malignant potential (LMP) are known to have a generally good prognosis, although there is not universal agreement on all aspects of treatment. We report a series of 175 patients with LMP ovarian tumours referred to the Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer between January, 1982 and December, 1993. Stage I disease accounted for 142 cases, with only 1 patient dead from disease at 293 months. Twenty nine patients in this group had conservative surgery with 1 recurrence only (in the contralateral ovary) giving a recurrence rate of 3.5%. Survival and treatment data for other stages are presented, and the current literature reviewed. It is suggested that early stage disease may be treated conservatively depending upon the patient's desire to retain reproductive capacity. While adjuvant therapy is not recommended, long-term follow-up is indicated. More advanced disease should be debulked to the smallest practical volume. The role of lymphadenectomy has been questioned, as survival has not been shown to be affected by treatment decisions made as a result of knowing the lymph node status. Whilst some centres give platinum-based adjuvant therapy, the evidence that it is beneficial is not supported by any prospective randomized trials.

A trend toward more conservative surgery in gynecologic oncology

A trend toward more conservative surgical intervention is evident in the current management of many gynecologic malignancies. The trend to manage vulvar carcinoma has moved away from the standard en bloc radical vulvectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy and now consists of more limited excision of the primary tumor as well as of the regional lymph nodes. In preinvasive cervical carcinoma, conization is preferred instead of hysterectomy. The possibility for a more conservative surgical approach is also being explored for the treatment of selected early stage and advanced or recurrent cervical carcinomas. Although the primary surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma remains unchanged, the necessity to perform (in all cases) the more extensive procedure required for staging purposes is being challenged. In early stage borderline ovarian tumors, not only adnexectomy but cystectomy alone is considered acceptable and reexploration for staging purposes may be unwarranted. In stage IA invasive carcinoma, adnexectomy of the involved side only is probably also sufficient. In advanced ovarian carcinoma, the more aggressive cytoreduction involving multiple organ resection is being restrained. Secondary debulking is performed only on a selective basis and the routine performance of second-look laparotomy has been given up.

Borderline ovarian tumors

Borderline tumor of the ovary (BOT) is an epithelial tumor with a low rate of growth and a low potential to invade or metastasize. This tumor often is associated with a significantly better prognosis than epithelial ovarian cancer. Most tumors are either serous or mucinous in histology and present as early stage lesions. However, stage III lesions with peritoneal implants are not uncommon. Patients with early stage lesions have an excellent prognosis. Patients with higher stage lesions have a worse prognosis. Long-term follow-up of patients with BOT is required since the tumor can recur up to 20 years after the initial diagnosis. Recently, investigators have begun to identify subsets of patients with a worse prognosis, such as patients with aneuploid tumors. Treatment for early stage lesions is surgical and conservative surgery can be accomplished successfully in younger patients who desire to maintain fertility. Treatment for later stage lesions has been approached in a variety of ways. All approaches initially begin with maximal cytoreductive surgery. Studies suggest that early stage disease should be managed with surgery alone. Conflicting results on the usefulness of adjuvant therapy for patients with later stage disease have been obtained. At this time, the usefulness of adjuvant therapy for advanced disease remains undetermined. Further understanding of the basis of the disease and analysis of specific higher risk subsets might identify patients in whom adjuvant therapy could be tested in the setting of controlled clinical trials.

Current concepts in management of epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential

Approximately 15 percent of epithelial ovarian tumors are tumors of LMP. Epithelial stratification, cellular atypia, mitotic activity, and abscence of ovarian stromal invasion set the histopathological criteria for diagnosis. Serous and mucinous tumors of LMP represent 80 to 95% of all cases. These tumors occur in patients at a younger age than those with invasive cancer and many times in fertile women who have not accomplished their family planning yet. Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential carry a favorable prognosis in comparison to invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. The recurrence rate after surgery for these tumors ranges from 10 percent to 30 percent, occurring as late as 10 or more years after presentation. The majority of patients (80-92 percent) with ovarian tumors of LMP present with stage I disease. Peritoneal implants display a range of histologic appearances, ranging from benign glands to those with features of invasive disease. Tumor markers such as CA-125 are not as useful in tumors of LMP as in invasive ovarian carcinoma. Elevated CA-125 are found only in patients with advanced serous tumors of LMP; thus, other markers such as transvaginal Doppler measurements of vascular resistant index has been suggested for possible differentiation between a benign and LMP ovarian tumors before surgery. Primary conservative surgery consisting of unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is considered to be an appropriate treatment for young women with stage Ia ovarian tumors of LMP who wish to retain their fertility potential. Up to 70 percent of women who underwent conservative surgery subsequently conceive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Accuracy of frozen-section (intraoperative consultation) diagnosis of ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVE

Frozen-section evaluation of ovarian tumors can be used to establish a histopathologic diagnosis and guide the surgeon to perform the appropriate surgical procedure. A retrospective study was conducted to determine the accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis of ovarian tumors.

STUDY DESIGN

Frozen- and permanent-section diagnoses were divided into three categories (benign, borderline, and malignant). The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values, and 95% percent confidence intervals of each frozen-section diagnosis were determined.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-three ovarian tumors that underwent frozen-section evaluation between June 1983 and June 1993 were studied. The final histopathologic diagnosis was 61.1% benign, 7.6% borderline, and 31.3% malignant. Frozen section was accurate in 92.7% of all cases and inaccurate in 7.3%. The sensitivity for malignant tumors was 92.5% tumors (95% confidence intervals 87.7% to 97.2%), the sensitivity for borderline tumors was 44.8% (95% confidence interval 26.4% to 63.2%). The specificity for benign tumors was 92.0% (95% confidence interval 88.6% to 95.4%) but increased to 97.9% (95% confidence interval 96.1% to 99.7%) if borderline tumors were excluded. The positive predictive value and 95% confidence intervals were 92.0% (88.6% to 95.4%) for benign tumors, 65% (43.6% to 86.5%) for borderline tumors, and 99.1% (97.3% to 100.0%) for malignant tumors. Thirteen of 16 (81%) ovarian lymphomas and tumors metastatic to the ovary were correctly identified by intraoperative frozen section. The sensitivity for borderline serous tumors was 64.3% and for borderline mucinous tumors 30.8% (p = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

With the exception of borderline tumors, the sensitivity and specificity of frozen-section diagnosis of ovarian tumors are high. Borderline tumors remain difficult to accurately diagnose at frozen section because of the extensive sampling required. Frozen-section diagnoses have important implications regarding the type and extent of surgery performed at the initial operation.