Effects of D1 and D2 dopamine antagonists on behavior of polydipsic rats

Chronic ∆-9-tetrahydrocannabinol administration delays acquisition of schedule-induced drinking in rats and retains long-lasting effects

RATIONALE

Schedule-induced drinking (SID) is a behavioural phenomenon characterized by an excessive and repetitive drinking pattern with a distinctive temporal distribution that has been proposed as a robust and replicable animal model of compulsivity. Despite cannabis currently being the most widely consumed illicit drug, with growing interest in its clinical applications, little is known about the effects of ∆-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on SID.

OBJECTIVES

The effects of chronic and acute THC administration on SID acquisition, maintenance and extinction were studied, as were the effects of such administrations on the distinctive temporal distribution pattern of SID.

METHODS

THC (5 mg/kg i.p.), or the corresponding vehicle, was administered to adult Wistar rats for 14 days in a row. Subsequently, THC effects on SID acquisition were tested during 21 sessions using a 1-h fixed-time 60-s food delivery schedule. Acute effects of THC were also evaluated after SID development. Finally, two extinction sessions were conducted to assess behavioural persistence.

RESULTS

The results showed that previous chronic THC treatment delayed SID acquisition and altered the distinctive behavioural temporal distribution pattern during sessions. Moreover, acute THC administration after SID development decreased SID performance in animals chronically pre-treated with the drug. No great persistence effects were observed during extinction in animals pre-treated with THC.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that chronic THC affects SID development, confirming that it can disrupt learning, possibly causing alterations in time estimation, and also leads to animals being sensitized when they are re-exposed to the drug after long periods without drug exposure.

The Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis, Homeostatic Satiety, and Compulsions: What Can We Learn From Polydipsia?

A compulsive phenotype characterizes several neuropsychiatric illnesses - including but not limited to - schizophrenia and obsessive compulsive disorder. Because of its perceived etiological heterogeneity, it is challenging to disentangle the specific neurophysiology that precipitates compulsive behaving. Using polydipsia (or non-regulatory water drinking), we describe candidate neural substrates of compulsivity. We further postulate that aberrant neuroplasticity within cortically projecting structures [i.e., the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST)] and circuits that encode homeostatic emotions (thirst, hunger, satiety, etc.) underlie compulsive drinking. By transducing an inaccurate signal that fails to represent true homeostatic state, cortical structures cannot select appropriate and adaptive actions. Additionally, augmented dopamine (DA) reactivity in striatal projections to and from the frontal cortex contribute to aberrant homeostatic signal propagation that ultimately biases cortex-dependent behavioral selection. Responding becomes rigid and corresponds with both erroneous, inflexible encoding in both bottom-up structures and in top-down pathways. How aberrant neuroplasticity in circuits that encode homeostatic emotion result in the genesis and maintenance of compulsive behaviors needs further investigation.

The amphetamine sensitization model of schizophrenia symptoms and its effect on schedule-induced polydipsia in the rat

RATIONALE

Amphetamine enhances dopamine (DA) transmission and induces psychotic states or exacerbates psychosis in at-risk individuals. Amphetamine sensitization of the DA system has been proposed as a rodent model of schizophrenia-like symptoms. In humans, excessive nonphysiologic drinking or primary polydipsia is significantly associated with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. In rodents, nonphysiologic drinking can be induced by intermittent presentation of food in the presence of a drinking spout to a hungry animal; this phenomenon is termed, "schedule-induced polydipsia" (SIP).

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the effects of amphetamine sensitization on SIP.

METHODS

We injected rats with amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg) daily for 5 days. Following 4 weeks of withdrawal, animals were food restricted and exposed to the SIP protocol (noncontingent fixed-time 1-min food schedule) for daily 2-h sessions for 24 days.

RESULTS

Results showed that previously amphetamine-injected animals drank more in the SIP protocol and drank more than controls when the intermittent food presentation schedule was removed.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that hyperdopaminergia associated with schizophrenia may contribute to the development of polydipsia in this population. Whether animals that develop SIP have DA dysfunction or aberrant activity of other circuits that modulate DA activity has yet to be clearly defined.

Applications of schedule-induced polydipsia in rodents for the study of an excessive ethanol intake phenotype

Schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP) is generated by subjecting a highly motivated animal to a sub-optimal rate of food reinforcement while also providing access to a fluid. SIP is one of several adjunctive (or displacement) behaviors that are expressed in an exaggerated form that is deemed 'excessive.' This feature makes SIP an attractive model for studying an excessive ethanol drinking phenotype in rodents. Multiple experimental variables are crucial for the full manifestation of adjunctive drinking, including the degree of food deprivation, the inter-pellet interval selected, and the size of the food reward offered. Although these variables were extensively studied and optimized for water polydipsia in rats, a similarly customized approach to ethanol SIP and application of the procedure in mice have largely been curtailed in favor of the default variable values historically used for water SIP in rats. Further, ethanol SIP also requires careful consideration of variables such as taste and ethanol concentration. Investigation of the stress axis and neurochemical systems such as dopamine and serotonin in mediating adjunctive drinking stemmed from two leading hypotheses regarding the underlying mechanisms of SIP generation: 1) SIP as a coping strategy to mitigate stress associated with the aversive environmental condition, and 2) SIP as a displacement of reward in a highly motivated animal. Ethanol SIP is a powerful model of excessive intake because it can generate an ethanol-dependent state and sustain frequent and intoxicating levels of blood ethanol with voluntary oral consumption. The required food deprivation and the loss of the excessive drinking phenotype following removal of the generator schedule are the two main limitations of the model. Future utility of ethanol SIP will be enhanced by more fully dissecting the underlying hormonal and neurochemical mechanisms and optimizing experimental variables for ethanol SIP on a per species and strain basis.

Schedule-induced polydipsia as a model of compulsive behavior: neuropharmacological and neuroendocrine bases

BACKGROUND

Schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP), characterized by the development of excessive drinking under intermittent food-reinforcement schedules, has been proposed as a successful model for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), schizophrenia, and alcohol abuse.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to review the main findings and current thinking regarding the use of SIP for compulsivity assessment and evaluate its contribution to improving our knowledge of the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying the excessive behavior manifested in SIP relevant to compulsive behavior disorders.

METHODS

The literature reviews SIP procedure and surveys main findings about its neurobehavioral basis and pharmacology relevant to its possible status as a model for compulsive disorders. Specifically, we reviewed effects of antipsychotics and serotoninergic drugs used in the treatment of OCD and schizophrenia. We also considered individual differences in SIP and its relevance as a possible compulsivity endophenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

SIP represents an animal model of non-regulatory and excessive drinking that may be valid for studying the psychopharmacology of the compulsive phenotype and modeling different psychopathologies from compulsivity spectrum disorders.

Poor inhibitory control and neurochemical differences in high compulsive drinker rats selected by schedule-induced polydipsia

RATIONALE

Schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP), characterized by the development of excessive drinking under intermittent food reinforcement schedules, has been proposed as a model for obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia and drug abuse.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to investigate if individual differences in SIP reflect psychopathological behavioural traits related to lack of inhibitory control and reactivity to novelty, and if these differences have neurochemical correlates.

METHODS

Outbred Wistar rats were selected for being either high (HD) or low (LD) drinkers according to their SIP behaviour. We tested locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and inhibitory control on the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT), under baseline vs. extinction conditions and following challenge with D: -amphetamine (saline, 0.5 or 1 mg/kg). Post-mortem analyses of the monoaminergic levels in different brain regions were also analysed.

RESULTS

Compared to LD animals, HD rats exhibiting SIP acquisition showed no differences in spontaneous locomotor reactivity to novelty. On the 5-CSRTT, HD rats showed a greater increase in perseverative responses under extinction, a trend towards elevated premature responses on baseline, and a significantly greater elevation of premature responses to D: -amphetamine 0.5 mg/kg. The HD animals also exhibited increased serotonin activity in the amygdala, and correlational analyses between the rate of drinking on SIP and monoamine levels also revealed altered dopaminergic mesolimbic function.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show that HD rats selected by SIP exhibit compulsive and impulsive behaviour based on measures of performance on the five-choice serial reaction time task and associated with changes in monoaminergic systems in limbic-striatal circuitry.

Haloperidol both prevents and reverses quinpirole-induced nonregulatory water intake, a putative animal model of psychogenic polydipsia

RATIONALE

Polydipsia is a severe complication of long-term schizophrenia and, despite its unknown pathogenesis, is empirically treated with typical or atypical antipsychotics. In the rat, nonregulatory water intake is induced by repeated administration of amphetamine-like compounds or by the D2/3 agonist, quinpirole.

OBJECTIVE

This study is aimed at determining the potential activity of antipsychotic compounds with different affinities for D2 receptors in preventing and/or reversing quinpirole-induced polydipsia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with five injections of quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) to induce polydipsia. The oral effects of haloperidol, olanzapine, clozapine, and ST2472 on QNP-induced polydipsia were analyzed in the following two schedules. In the preventive schedule, haloperidol (0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mg/kg), olanzapine (1.5, 3, and 6 mg/kg), ST2472 (1 and 2 mg/kg), and clomipramine (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) were given in combination with quinpirole from day 1 to day 5. In the reversal schedule, rats showing quinpirole-induced polydipsia on the third day received haloperidol (0.4 mg/kg), olanzapine (1.5 and 3 mg/kg), clozapine (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg), ST2472 (1, 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg), and clomipramine (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) before quinpirole on days 4 and 5.

RESULTS

Haloperidol both prevented and reversed quinpirole-induced polydipsia, whereas olanzapine and ST2472 only reversed it. Clomipramine prevented but did not reverse quinpirole-induced polydipsia, and clozapine did not reverse it either.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that, once developed, polydipsia is governed by dopaminergic D2 mechanisms. In contrast, either an increase in the serotoninergic tone or an inhibition of D2 receptors can modulate the development of quinpirole-induced excessive drinking.

Animal models with potential applications for screening compounds for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

The availability of an animal model for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is necessary for the development of novel pharmacological treatments. To be useful, the model must be predictive of clinical performance, possess characteristic criteria and distinguish anti-OCD from antidepressant compounds. Due to the lack of OCD models useful for drug discovery, all compounds currently used for OCD were developed first as antidepressants. In this article, we discuss the relative merits of: stereotypic behaviours (canine acral lick, feather picking, amphetamine- and 5-HT-induced stereotypy); adjunctive and displacement behaviours (schedule-induced polydipsia, wheel running, resident-intruder grooming); anxiolytic tests (separation and shock-induced ultrasonic vocalisation and marble burying); and depression tests (inescapable shock-induced escape and immobility in forced swim) as potential OCD models. We conclude that adjunctive and displacement behaviours, and in particular schedule-induced polydipsia, may prove to be the best models for compulsive behaviour in animals that can be used for the discovery of novel anti-OCD agents.

The role of adrenoreceptors in control of stereotyped oral behavior in restricted-fed fowls

Effects on environmentally induced oral stereotypies (object pecking and drinker-directed activity) of preferential antagonists and agonists of adrenoreceptor subtypes were examined in individually caged broiler breeder fowls subjected to chronic food restriction. Three drugs in each category were injected intravenously at three doses, and their effects compared with a saline control treatment. With the antagonists, object pecking was suppressed more by prazosin (alpha 1) and propranolol (beta) than by yohimbine (alpha 2), while drinker-directed activity showed delayed stimulation with yohimbine and propranolol. With the agonists, drinker-directed activity was suppressed more by clonidine (alpha 2) than by isoproterenol (beta) and phenylephrine (alpha 1), while object pecking was inhibited by the high doses of clonidine and isoproterenol but showed delayed stimulation with the low dose of clonidine and (nonsignificantly) the high dose of phenylephrine. Initial suppression of both oral stereotypies by the high doses of yohimbine and isoproterenol, and high and medium doses of clonidine, may have been due to sedation, because in those instances it coincided with increased sitting, an activity not normally seen. Increased standing with clonidine and the medium dose of yohimbine may also reflect sedation. When there were no significant increases in sitting or standing to indicate sedation, responses of both stereotypies were essentially the same with all three adrenoreceptor subtypes; i.e., object pecking was inhibited by the antagonist but not the agonist, while drinker-directed activity was inhibited by the agonist but not the antagonist. It is concluded that alpha 1, alpha 2, and beta adrenoreceptors are all implicated in expression of these stereotypes, and that the two activities may be differentially controlled.

Naltrexone, dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists, and food intake in rats: 1. Food deprivation

Different forms of food intake are reduced by both agonists and antagonists of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors as well as general opioid antagonists. The present study evaluated whether deprivation (24 h)-induced food intake was altered following systemic administration of either the D1 agonist, SKF-38393, the D1 antagonist, SCH-23390, the D2 agonist, quinpirole, or the D2 antagonist, haloperidol, alone or in combination with the general opioid antagonist, naltrexone. Both SKF-38393 (5-10 mg/kg) and SCH-23390 (100-200 micrograms/kg) significantly and dose dependently reduced deprivation-induced intake. Whereas quinpirole (0.5-1 mg/kg) failed to alter deprivation-induced intake, haloperidol increased deprivation-induced intake at low (50 micrograms) doses and decreased intake at higher (100-500 micrograms/kg) doses. Naltrexone (2.5-10 mg/kg) significantly inhibited deprivation-induced intake. When naltrexone was paired with behaviorally ineffective doses of either SCH-23390 (2.5-100 micrograms/kg), quinpirole (0.01-1 mg/kg), or haloperidol (50 micrograms/kg), the degree of reduction of deprivation-induced intake was significantly greater than that produced by naltrexone alone. Pairing naltrexone with SKF-38393 produced reductions of deprivation-induced intake comparable to that of naltrexone alone.

Influence of pharmacological manipulation of dopamine and opioid receptor subtypes on stereotyped behaviour of restricted-fed fowls

Effects on environmentally induced oral stereotypes (object pecking and drinker directed activity) of antagonists and agonists of dopamine and opioid receptor subtypes were examined in individually caged broiler breeder fowls subjected to chronic food restriction. Three drugs in each category were injected intravenously at three doses, and their effects compared with those of a saline control treatment. With dopamine antagonists, inhibition of both stereotypes was most marked with haloperidol (D2), intermediate with clozapine (D4), and lowest with SCH 23390 (D1). Increased sitting with the high doses of these three drugs may reflect sedation. With dopamine agonists, SKF 38393 (D1) suppressed both stereotypes slightly, quinpirole (D3) did so consistently and potently, possibly reflecting preferential presynaptic action, while bromocriptine (D2) inhibited drinker-directed activity consistently, but its initial suppression of object pecking changed to delayed stimulation with the high dose. This biphasic effect of bromocriptine may reflect change from pre- to postsynaptic action. Two of the opioid antagonists, naltrexone (mu) and MR 2266 (kappa, but also mu), inhibited object pecking partially, while naltrindole (delta) and the opioid agonists fentanyl (mu), BUBU (delta), and PD 117302 (kappa) had delayed and minor effects. These results suggest that expression of object pecking, but not necessarily drinker-directed activity, depends more on activation of D2 dopamine receptors than D1 receptors, the role of D3 and D4 receptors is less clear, and activation of mu and possibly kappa opioid receptors may play a contributory role.

Effect of clozapine upon schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP) resembles neither the actions of dopamine D1 nor D2 blockade

The effects of clozapine (CLOZ) upon acquired schedule-induced polydipsia in rats were compared to the effects of the dopamine (DA) D1 antagonist SCH 23390 (SCH) and the DA D2 antagonist raclopride (RAC). All three compounds suppressed water consumption, but only SCH and RAC decreased drinking efficiency. SCH was the only compound with an effect on panel pressing (PP), causing suppression even at a dose without effect upon water intake. SCH also affected the temporal pattern of licking (TPL) at all doses, while clozapine, 10 mg/kg, only affected the pattern acutely, and raclopride was without effect. In conclusion, PP and the TPL are more sensitive to D1 than D2 blockade. While PP and the TPL are more sensitive than water intake to D1 blockade, the opposite is true for D2 blockade. It is possible to differentiate between DA D1/D2 antagonists and CLOZ in this model, focusing upon reduction in water consumption, with and without reduction in drinking efficiency. Furthermore, it is possible to differentiate between D1 and D2 blockade by analyzing water consumption, PP and the TPL.