Effect of salbutamol on gastroesophageal reflux in healthy volunteers and patients with asthma

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Asthma: A Narrative Review

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined by retrograde reflux of gastric contents to the esophagus leading to various signs and symptoms that range from heartburn/regurgitation to the development of extraesophageal respiratory syndromes like asthma. Although a cause-effect relationship has been proposed, evidence suggests that these two entities share a complex mechanism that may be reciprocal to each other. The understanding of the underlying mechanisms is imperial due to the fact that asthmatic patients may benefit from reflux therapy with subsequent improvement in pulmonary function testing and quality of life. This study has revised available literature in order to provide evidence for a nexus between GERD and asthma based on clinical correlation, pathophysiology, and pharmacologic management.

Extra-esophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma: understanding this interplay

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition that develops when there is reflux of stomach contents, which typically manifests as heartburn and regurgitation. These esophageal symptoms are well recognized; however, there are extra-esophageal manifestations of GERD, which include asthma, chronic cough, laryngitis and sinusitis. With the rising incidence of asthma, there is increasing interest in identifying how GERD impacts asthma development and therapy. Due to the poor sensitivity of endoscopy and pH monitoring, empiric therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is now considered the initial diagnostic step in patients suspected of having GERD-related symptoms. If unresponsive, diagnostic testing with pH monitoring off therapy and/or impedance/pH monitoring on therapy, may be reasonable in order to assess for baseline presence of reflux with the former and exclude continued acid or weakly acid reflux with the latter tests. PPI-unresponsive asthmatics, without overt regurgitation, usually have either no reflux or causes other than GERD. In this group, PPI therapy should be discontinued. In those with GERD as a contributing factor acid suppressive therapy should be continued as well as optimally treating other etiologies requiring concomitant treatment. Surgical fundoplication is rarely needed but in those with a large hiatal hernia, moderate-to-severe reflux by pH monitoring surgery might be helpful in eliminating the need for high-dose acid suppressive therapy.

Lung function in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease and respiratory symptoms

The aim of this study was to investigate lung function in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) who present respiratory symptoms suggestive of the possibility of co-morbid asthma. The study encompassed 20 patients (9 women and 11 men; age range from 11 to 68 years) diagnosed with GERD and presenting with chronic cough and other non-specific periodic respiratory complaints. The control group consisted of closely gender and age-matched 20 subjects without any gastrointestinal or respiratory symptoms. All patients and control subjects were tested for lung function, which encompassed spirometric and flow-volume variables. We found that none of the GERD patients had lung function abnormalities characteristic of asthma. There were, however, decreases in forced expired volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity, and in maximal instantaneous forced expiratory flows in the GERD patients compared with the healthy subjects. We conclude that cough accompanying GERD is unlikely to be associated with the presence of co-morbid asthma, but rather suggests a mild airway inflammation developing as a sequel of GERD. The corollary is that chronic cough should prompt physician's attention to consider diagnostic work-up toward the possibility of GERD.

The effects of nebulized albuterol on esophageal function in asthmatic patients

PURPOSE

Albuterol reduces lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in normal volunteers, although the effects of albuterol on esophageal function in asthmatic patients are not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of nebulized albuterol on lower esophageal function in asthmatic patients. Symptoms and a methacholine challenge test were used to identify asthmatic patients who were then enrolled in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, crossover trial. Changes in esophageal function in response to nebulized albuterol or placebo were evaluated over two sessions spaced 1 week apart.

RESULTS

Albuterol induced a dose-dependent drop in lower esophageal sphincter basal pressure with a threshold dose as low as 2.5 mg. Albuterol did not affect the amplitude of esophageal contractions.

CONCLUSIONS

Nebulized albuterol induces a dose-dependent reduction in LES basal pressure in asthmatic patients. These effects raise the possibility that gastroesophageal reflux may occur after bronchodilator therapy.

Clinical implications of gastroesophageal reflux disease and swallowing dysfunction in COPD

The intimate anatomical and physiologic relationship between the upper airway and esophagus consists of complex interactions between various muscles and nerves with both voluntary and involuntary patterns of control. Alterations in this harmonic relationship can lead to swallowing abnormalities ranging from dysphagia to gross aspiration, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chronic cough. There is a paucity of data regarding pathologic alterations in the upper airway-esophageal relationship in patients with COPD. The association between GERD and respiratory symptoms is well recognized in the setting of asthma; however, the nature of this relationship remains controversial. The association of GERD and COPD is even less clear. A review of the limited data on GERD and swallowing abnormalities in patients with COPD indicate that prevalence of GERD and esophageal disorders in patients with COPD is higher than in the normal population. However, its contribution to respiratory symptoms, bronchodilator use and pulmonary function in patients with COPD remains unknown. Although dysphagia and swallowing dysfunction on videofluoroscopic swallow evaluation are common in patients with COPD, their role as exacerbators of COPD remains to be elucidated. Further clinical research is necessary to evaluate the role of GERD and swallowing dysfunction in both stable and acute exacerbation of COPD.

Extraesophageal manifestations of GERD

The association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and extraesophageal disease is often referred to as extraesophageal reflux (EER). This article reviews EER, discussing epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment with a focus on the most studied and convincing EER disorders-asthma, cough, and laryngitis. Although EER comprises a heterogeneous group of disorders, some general characterizations can be made, as follows. First, although GERD's association with extraesophageal diseases is well-established, definitive evidence of causation has been more elusive, rendering epidemiological data scarce. Secondly, regarding the pathogenesis of EER, 2 basic models have been proposed: direct injury to extraesophageal tissue by acid and pepsin exposure or injury mediated through an esophageal reflex mechanism. Third, because heartburn and regurgitation are often absent in patients with EER, GERD may not be suspected. Even when GERD is suspected, the diagnosis may be difficult to confirm. Although endoscopy and barium esophagram remain important tools for detecting esophageal complications, they may fail to establish the presence of GERD. Even when GERD is diagnosed by endoscopy or barium esophagram, causation between GERD and extraesophageal symptoms cannot be determined. Esophageal pH is the most sensitive tool for detecting GERD, and it plays an important role in EER. However, even pH testing cannot establish GERD's causative relationship to extraesophageal symptoms. In this regard, effective treatment of GERD resulting in significant improvement or remission of the extraesophageal symptoms provides the best evidence for GERD's pathogenic role. Finally, EER generally requires more prolonged and aggressive antisecretory therapy than typical GERD requires.

Effects of bronchial obstruction on lower esophageal sphincter motility and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with asthma

The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and asthma remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of bronchial obstruction on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) motility and reflux in patients with asthma. LES motility and esophageal pH were assessed in eight subjects with intermittent asthma and eight healthy volunteers during three consecutive 30-minute periods: baseline, methacholine-induced bronchospasm, and after inhalation of the beta2-agonist salbutamol. Healthy subjects inhaled 2 mg of methacholine, whereas subjects with asthma inhaled the dose of methacholine causing a 15% fall in FEV(1), as determined by a previous methacholine challenge. LES motility, esophageal pH, and FEV(1) were not significantly different between the three periods in healthy subjects. In patients with asthma, methacholine induced a 21.9 +/- 2.6% decrease in FEV(1) and a concomitant increase in the rate of transient LES relaxation (TLESR) and reflux episodes. Inhalation of salbutamol decreased the rate of TLESRs but not the number of reflux episodes. We conclude that in patients with asthma, methacholine-induced bronchospasm increases the rate of TLESR and the number of reflux episodes. These results support the belief that, in asthma, bronchial obstruction may be responsible for reflux or may aggravate reflux through a mechanism that remains to be further clarified.

The effects of an inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonist on lower esophageal function: a dose-response study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Albuterol, a beta(2)-adrenergic agonist that is commonly used to treat asthma, reduces bronchial smooth muscle tone. The pharmacodynamics of inhaled albuterol on esophageal function were studied in healthy volunteers.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover design.

SETTING

An academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Nine healthy volunteers (five men, four women; age, 22 to 30 years).

INTERVENTIONS

Albuterol (2.5 to 10 mg) or placebo was given via nebulizer. Volunteers were studied at two sessions, 1 week apart, using a 6-cm manometry assembly and a low-compliance pneumohydraulic pump. The percentage of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, the frequency of transient LES relaxations (TLESRs), and the amplitude, duration, and propagation velocity of esophageal contractions were measured at 5 and 10 cm above the LES. Dependent measures were evaluated using two-way, repeated-measures analysis of variance.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Albuterol therapy reduced LES basal tone in a dose-dependent manner (baseline, 17.0 +/- 2.6 mm Hg; at 10 mg, 8.9 +/- 2.1 mm Hg; p = 0.01). The frequency of TLESRs was not different from placebo (not significant). Albuterol reduced the amplitude of esophageal contractions at 5 cm above the LES (baseline, 72.5 +/- 18.6 mm Hg; at 10 mg, 48.8 +/- 10.0 mm Hg; p<0.05). A significant reduction in esophageal body contractile amplitudes was noted at 10 cm (F[1,6] = 7.05; p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled albuterol reduced LES basal tone and contractile amplitudes in the smooth muscle esophageal body in a dose-dependent manner. Inhaled beta(2)-agonists may increase the likelihood of acid reflux in a subset of patients who receive cumulative dosing.

Gastroesophageal reflux and asthma: are they related?

The relationship between asthma and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is controversial. This paper reviews the evidence for an association between them, the effect of asthma on GER, and the effects of GER and antireflux therapy on asthma. The association between the two conditions seems firm but studies of the effects of GER on asthma and asthma on GER are contradictory. Critical review suggests that GER affects asthma symptoms but not pulmonary function. Antireflux therapy improves asthma symptoms and reduces medication requirements but does not improve pulmonary function. The paradox of GER causing asthma symptoms but not changing pulmonary function may be explained by its increasing minute ventilation rather than triggering bronchospasm.

Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in children and adolescents with severe asthma

BACKGROUND

The ability of gastroesophageal reflux disease to provoke asthma is controversial. Recent reports have suggested that reflux to the proximal esophagus may be especially likely to aggravate asthma, but the prevalence of proximal reflux in children and adolescents is poorly documented. It is also unclear how sensitive and specific the commonly used tests of reflux, barium swallow, and scintiscan are compared with pH probe studies in young patients. There is limited information on the effectiveness of the combination of H2 blockers and prokinetic agents in controlling reflux in children.

OBJECTIVE

There were three objectives in this study: (1) to determine the prevalence of both proximal and distal gastroesophageal reflux in asthmatic children and adolescents; (2) to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of barium swallow and scintiscan studies; and (3) to determine the effectiveness of standard antireflux pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

A 24-hour, 2-channel pH probe study was carried out in 79 asthmatic children aged 2 to 17 years. The prevalence of abnormal proximal and distal gastroesophageal reflux was calculated from the findings. In 63 of these patients, barium swallow and Technetium99 scintiscan were carried out and the findings used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of these studies relative to pH probe. In 11 subjects a follow-up, 24-hour pH probe was carried out after at least 3 weeks of therapy with an H2 blocker and prokinetic agent to determine the efficacy of therapy.

RESULTS

There was abnormal proximal esophageal reflux in 64.5% of subjects and abnormal distal reflux in 73.4%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of barium swallow were 46.1%, 83.3%, 82% and 51%, respectively. Those of scintiscan were 15%, 72.7%, 50% and 32%, respectively. Of 11 subjects studied by repeat pH probe, 10 had persistent abnormal reflux.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal reflux into the proximal esophagus occurs in the majority of asthmatic children with difficult-to-control disease. The barium swallow and scintiscan compare poorly with pH probe in diagnosing reflux. Treatment of reflux with recommended does of H2 blockers and prokinetic agents has a high failure rate, and follow-up studies are essential.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and asthma

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GOR) and asthma are both common medical conditions that often co-exist. Studies using oesophageal manometry and 24 h ambulatory pH monitoring have shown that up to 80% of asthmatics have abnormal GOR. A number of mechanisms whereby GOR may trigger asthma have been proposed, and it is believed that acid reflux may stimulate vagal receptors in the lower oesophagus causing reflex bronchoconstriction. However, GOR may be worsened by asthma causing abnormal diaphragm mechanics and by its treatment. Formal evaluation of GOR should be considered a part of asthma assessment, particularly if asthmatic symptoms are precipitated by factors known to trigger GOR such as reclining, alcohol ingestion, and the use of theophylline. Twenty-four hour ambulatory intra-oesophageal pH monitoring remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of GOR. Medical therapy with anti-reflux medications, such as acid suppressive agents and prokinetic agents may improve both GOR and asthma control. In those who fail medical therapy, anti-reflux surgery may be warranted in some.