Defective platelet aggregation in uremia is transiently worsened by hemodialysis

Cardiac Surgery Outcomes in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis Versus Peritoneal Dialysis

Rationale & Objective

We sought to compare outcomes of patients receiving dialysis after cardiothoracic surgery on the basis of dialysis modality (intermittent hemodialysis [HD] vs peritoneal dialysis [PD]).

Study Design

This was a retrospective analysis.

Setting & Participants

In total, 590 patients with kidney failure receiving intermittent HD or PD undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and/or valvular cardiac surgery at Cleveland Clinic were included.

Exposure

The patients received PD versus HD (intermittent or continuous).

Outcomes

Our primary outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, days in the intensive care unit, the number of intraoperative blood transfusions, postsurgical pericardial effusion, and sternal wound infection, and a composite of the following 4 in-hospital events: death, cardiac arrest, effusion, and sternal wound infection.

Analytical Approach

We used χ2, Fisher exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, and t tests, Kaplan-Meier survival, and plots for analysis.

Results

Among the 590 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, 62 (11%) were receiving PD, and 528 (89%) were receiving intermittent HD. Notably, 30-day Kaplan-Meier survival was 95.7% (95% CI: 93.9-97.5) for HD and 98.2% (95% CI: 94.7-100) for PD (P = 0.30). In total, 75 patients receiving HD (14.2%) and 1 patient receiving PD (1.6%) had a composite of 4 in-hospital events (death, cardiac arrest, effusion, and sternal wound infection) (P = 0.005). Out of 62 patients receiving PD, 16 (26%) were converted to HD.

Limitations

Retrospective analyses are prone to residual confounding. We lacked details about nutritional data. Intensive care unit length of stay was used as a surrogate for volume status control. Patients have been followed in a single health care system. The HD cohort outnumbered the PD cohort significantly.

Conclusions

When compared with PD, HD does not appear to improve outcomes of patients with kidney failure undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Patients receiving PD had a lower incidence of a composite outcome of 4 in-hospital events (death, cardiac arrest, pericardial effusion, and sternal wound infections).

Efficacy and safety of Apixaban for the prevention of thrombosis in arteriovenous grafts

This research aims to fill a vital gap in existing studies by evaluating the efficacy and safety of Apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, in the prevention of arteriovenous graft (AVG) thrombosis, thereby offering substantial insights into alternative anticoagulant options for hemodialysis patients. Conducted as a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, this study involved end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who had recently received polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Participants were assigned to receive either Apixaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily or a placebo. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of graft thrombosis, while secondary outcomes focused on the incidence and severity of bleeding. Analytical methods included Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox proportional hazards models, and conventional statistical tests. With 96 patients enrolled, the study found that Apixaban significantly reduced the incidence of AVG thrombosis compared to placebo (16.7% vs. 62.5%, P < 0.0001). Notably, this reduction in thrombosis incidence was not accompanied by an increase in bleeding events, thus affirming the safety profile of Apixaban as established in prior research. Apixaban is identified as an efficacious alternative to traditional anticoagulants in the prevention of AVG thrombosis among hemodialysis patients, representing a notable advancement in the care of individuals with ESRD. The results of this study support further investigations into the optimal dosing strategies specifically tailored for this patient demographic.

Use of direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism treatment at extremes of body weight, renal and liver function: an illustrated review

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been a welcome addition to clinical practice due to the practical advantages they confer over traditional anticoagulants. In many countries, DOACs are now used as first-line treatment for the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Traditional anticoagulants allow for a degree of individualization, either through monitoring the international normalized ratio in the case of vitamin-K antagonists or through dose titration according to bodyweight in the case of low-molecular-weight heparin. However, the use of fixed doses and removal of the need for routine monitoring has created uncertainty in prescribing DOACs for patients at the extremes of bodyweight, renal function, and patients with liver impairment, who were not well represented in the DOAC licensing clinical trials. The discipline of pharmacokinetics is concerned with the movement of drugs through the body. Although the extremes of bodyweight and renal and liver function will influence the pharmacokinetics of DOACs, are these changes significant enough to affect clinical outcomes of bleeding and thrombosis? In other words, can the fixed-dosing strategy of DOACs accommodate these differences in physiology? In this review, we recap key pharmacokinetic principles for drug dosing; review venous thromboembolism trial and real-world data on patients prescribed DOACs at the extremes of bodyweight, renal function, and liver function; relate this to the pharmacokinetic properties of DOACs; and summarize the state of the field and current unknowns.

Choosing the right chronic medication for hemodialysis patients. A short ABC for the dialysis nephrologist

BACKGROUND

Adapting drug treatments for patients on hemodialysis with multiple chronic pathologies is a complex affair. When prescribing a medication, the risk-benefit analysis usually focuses primarily on the indication of the drug class prescribed. However, the pharmacokinetics of the chosen drug should also be taken into account. The purpose of our review was to identify the drugs to be favored in each therapeutic class, according to their safety and pharmacokinetic profiles, for the most common chronic diseases in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

METHODS

We conducted a narrative review of the literature using Medline and Web of Science databases, targeting studies on the most commonly-prescribed drugs for non-communicable diseases in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

RESULTS

The search identified 1224 articles, 95 of which were further analyzed. The main classes of drugs included concern the cardiovascular system (anti-hypertensives, anti-arrhythmics, anti-thrombotics, hypocholesterolemics), the endocrine and metabolic pathways (anti-diabetics, gastric anti-secretory, anticoagulant, thyroid hormones, anti-gout) and psychiatric and neurological disorders (antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics and anti-epileptics).

CONCLUSION

We report on the most often prescribed drugs for chronic pathologies in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Most of them require adaptation, and in some cases one better alternative stands out among the drug class. More pharmacokinetic data are needed to define the pharmacokinetics in the various dialysis techniques.

Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: CODE-AF Registry

PURPOSE

Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), including end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis, increases thromboembolic risk among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study examined the comparative safety and efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared to warfarin or no oral anticoagulant (OAC) in AF patients with advanced CKD or ESRD on dialysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using data from the COmparison study of Drugs for symptom control and complication prEvention of AF (CODE-AF) registry, 260 non-valvular AF patients with advanced CKD (defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73/m²) or ESRD on dialysis were enrolled from June 2016 to July 2020. The study population was categorized into DOAC, warfarin, and no OAC groups; and differences in major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism (SE), myocardial infarction/critical limb ischemia (CLI), and death were assessed.

RESULTS

During a median 24 months of follow-up, major or CRNM bleeding risk was significantly reduced in the DOAC group compared to the warfarin group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.93, p=0.043]. In addition, the risk of composite adverse clinical outcomes (major or CRNM bleeding, stroke/SE, myocardial infarction/CLI, and death) was significantly reduced in the DOAC group compared to the no OAC group (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.91, p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

Among AF patients with advanced CKD or ESRD on dialysis, DOAC was associated with a lower risk of major or CRNM bleeding compared to warfarin and a lower risk of composite adverse clinical outcomes compared to no OAC. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02786095).

Hemoperitoneum complicating an oocyte puncture in a chronic hemodialysis patient

We report the case of a 31-year-old patient on chronic hemodialysis for 17 years, after two failed kidney grafts, presently on daily home hemodialysis. She underwent follicle puncture for oocyte retrieval in the context of an in vitro fertilization program. This procedure was complicated by hemoperitoneum, requiring transfusion of 2 units of packed red blood cells and 2 units of fresh-frozen plasma, as well as an emergency laparoscopy to drain the hemoperitoneum and perform local hemostasis of the ovarian bleeding. This complication occurred following the patient's routine hemodialysis session, performed with the usual systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin. The evolution was favorable and there was no recurrence of bleeding or sequelae. A later hematology workup did not reveal any pathology of hemostasis that might have favored bleeding. This case may underline how, even though assisted reproductive procedures are increasingly performed in patients on dialysis, special care should be taken when these procedures are performed in this fragile population.

The use of a low-flux hemo-dialyzer is associated with impaired platelet aggregation in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis

In patients with chronic hemodialysis (HD), both abnormal thrombotic and bleeding events are commonly observed. Uremic platelet dysfunction is one of the important attributing factors. Moreover, HD may also result in aggregation dysfunction of platelets during the therapeutic procedure. However, how the HD process affects platelet and coagulation function is unknown and dialyzer membrane flux could have an impact on it. We aimed to compare the impacts of low-flux and high-flux HD on the platelet function of patients undergoing chronic HD. This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the HD unit of E-Da hospital in Taiwan. A total of 78 patients with maintenance HD three times per week for more than one year, including 40 with high- and 38 with low-flux hemodialysis, were recruited. Their platelet functions were evaluated using an in vitro platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) before and after the HD session. Of the 78 patients undergoing HD, 60 (76%) had prolonged pre-dialysis collagen/epinephrine (CEPI) and collagen/adenosine diphosphate closure times. Those receiving low-flux dialyzer had a significant increase in CEPI closure time (pre-dialysis 212.3 ± 62.1 seconds. post-dialysis 241.5 ± 64.3 seconds, P = .01), but not collagen/adenosine diphosphate closure time, after HD. After adjusting confounding factors, only the low-flux dialyzer demonstrated an independent association with the prolonged CEPI closure time after HD therapy (odds ratio = 23.31, 95% CI: 1.94-280.61, P = .01). We observed that impaired platelet aggregation is prevalent in patients undergoing chronic HD. Therefore, the use of low-flux dialyzers may further worsen platelet aggregation after dialysis. Patients with uremic bleeding diathesis should take precautions. We suggest that further studies using flow cytometry should be conducted to explore the mechanism of dialysis flux and platelet activity during HD.

Platelet thrombus formation in patients with end-stage renal disease before and after hemodialysis as measured by the total thrombus-formation analysis system

Background

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving hemodialysis (HD) often experience bleeding. However, mechanisms behind this bleeding tendency are incompletely understood but may involve platelet dysfunction. We, therefore, studied platelet-dependent thrombus formation in flowing whole blood inside a microchip coated with collagen, and its association with circulating von Willebrand factor (VWF).

Methods

Blood samples were obtained in 22 patients before and after HD. The area under the 10 min flow pressure curve in a microchip (AUC10) reflecting total platelet thrombogenicity was measured, using the Total Thrombus-formation Analysis System (T-TAS01). AUC10 < 260 indicates platelet dysfunction. VWF activity and antigen in plasma were also assayed.

Results

VWF levels were moderately elevated and increased further after HD (P < 0.01 or lower). In contrast, AUC10 before and after HD was < 260 in 17/22 patients and < 130 in 15/22 patients, with no statistically significant difference in pre- vs post-HD measurements, indicating reduced platelet thrombogenicity, but with some variability as 5/22 patients showed normal platelet responsiveness. AUC10 and VWF activity or antigen levels in plasma were not correlated, either before or after HD.

Conclusions

Most ESRD patients display moderate-to-severe platelet dysfunction as assessed by shear-induced platelet-dependent thrombus formation with T-TAS01. HD does not influence platelet function despite HD-induced elevations in VWF. T-TAS01 should be further evaluated as a tool in the assessment of bleeding risk in patients on HD.

Graphical abstract

Safety and utility of kidney biopsy in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2

AIM

Kidney biopsy (KBx) is the gold standard for evaluation of kidney disease, but is associated with a higher risk of complications in patients with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We studied the safety and utility of KBx in patients with eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 .

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients with eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 , who were planned for a KBx and consented to participate were prospectively enrolled. Patients with solitary/transplant kidney or acute kidney injury were excluded. Haemoglobin was checked on the day of KBx and repeated 18-24 h later along with a screening ultrasound. Post-KBx complications were noted and their risk-factors analysed. The utility of the KBx was graded as effecting significant, some, or no change to subsequent management.

RESULTS

Of the 126 patients included, 75% were male, 27.7% were diabetic, and the median eGFR was 13.5 ml/min/1.73m2 . Major complications occurred in 5.6%. Peri-renal haematomas were detected in 37.3%, and haematomas ≥2 cm were significantly more frequent in those with eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 (29.2% vs. 13%, p = .032). Dialysis was a risk factor, while pre KBx blood transfusion, diabetes and higher serum albumin were protective against any complication. KBx was more likely to make a significant difference in management in those with eGFR 15-29 ml/min/1.73m2 (44.1% vs. 11.1%, p < .001). Increasing age, lower serum creatinine and albumin were independently associated with KBx utility.

CONCLUSION

KBx is relatively safe in severe kidney disease but its risk to benefit balance needs to be carefully considered when eGFR is <15 ml/min/1.73m2 .

Does Hemodialysis Need to be Initiated to Improve Platelet Function in CKD G5 Patients? A Pilot Prospective, Observational Cohort Study

Introduction:

We previously showed that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage G4-5 have normal bleeding times. This made us question whether hemodialysis (HD) initiation was really necessary solely to improve platelet function.

Methods:

In this prospective observational study, two 5 ml citrated blood samples and one 2 ml EDTA blood sample were collected from incident HD patients fulfilling inclusion criteria prior to HD initiation (baseline sample) and after three sessions of short duration, low flow, counter-current HD. In each instance, one sample was used to perform Collagen adenosine diphosphate closure time (CADPCT) using the Platelet function analyzer (PFA 200, normal range 68-142 seconds) and the second for light transmission aggregometry (LTA) with ADP as agonist (normal ≥50%).

Results:

This study included 20 patients between October 2017 and February 2019. Overall, and in the subgroup with normal baseline CADPCT or LTA, there was no statistically significant improvement after HD. However, of the 30% of patients who had an abnormal baseline CADPCT, 50% attained a normal value after three HD sessions, and the overall reduction in CADPCT in this group was statistically significant (P = 0.02). Of those with a baseline normal CADPCT, 21% developed abnormal prolongation post HD.

Conclusion:

HD for the sole purpose of improving platelet function is only of benefit in the subgroup of patients with an abnormal CADPCT at baseline, with close to 50% normalizing their platelet function after three sessions of low flow, short duration, counter-current HD.

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Renal Disease

Over the past decade, there have been tremendous advancements in anticoagulation therapies for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes compared with warfarin overall, the decision to anticoagulate and the choice of appropriate agent in patients with AF and concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are a particularly complex issue. CKD and ESRD increase both the risk of stroke and bleeding, and since all of the NOACs undergo various levels of renal clearance, renal dysfunction inevitably affects the pharmacokinetics of the drug in each patient. Furthermore, the randomized controlled clinical trials of each NOAC versus warfarin often did not include patients with advanced CKD or ESRD. In this focused review, we describe the available evidence supporting the use of NOACs for prevention of stroke in patients with AF with concomitant advanced CKD or ESRD. Although questions of safety and appropriate use of these new agents in CKD and ESRD remain, NOACs offer a significant step forward in the anticoagulation management of at-risk patients with AF.

Nonvitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in chronic kidney disease patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As in the general population, in CKD patients AF is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism and stroke. However, CKD patients, especially those on renal replacement therapy (RRT), also exhibit an increased risk of bleeding, especially from the gastrointestinal tract. Oral anticoagulation is the most effective form of thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF presenting increased risk of stroke. Limited evidence on efficacy, the increased risk of bleeding as well as some concern regarding the use of warfarin in CKD, has often resulted in the underuse of anticoagulation CKD patients. A large body of evidence suggests that non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) significantly reduce the risk of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin in normal renal function subjects. Hence, they are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. However, NOACs metabolism is largely dependent on the kidneys for elimination and little is known in patients with creatinine clearance <25ml/min who were excluded from all pivotal phase 3 NOACs trials. This review focuses on the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance 15-49ml/min) and those on dialysis.

Warfarin Use and Risk of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Meta-Analysis

In spite of the substantial burden of atrial fibrillation and associated elevated ischemic stroke risk in patients undergoing hemodialysis, the role of warfarin in these high-risk patients remains uncertain. Our objective was to clarify the association between warfarin use and risk of stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing dialysis.PubMed and Embase from January 1966 to January 2015 were searched to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were cohort studies, patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing hemodialysis, and reported quantitative estimates of the multivariate adjusted relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for future stroke associated with warfarin use. We identified 8 studies, with a total of 9539 participants and 706 stroke events. Three studies reported total stroke as primary endpoint and other studies reported ischemic stroke as primary endpoint. Pooling the results showed that warfarin use was associated with higher risk of any stroke (RR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.13-1.99). By stroke type, warfarin was not significantly linked to risk of ischemic stroke (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.65-1.57, P = 0.97), but was related to greater hemorrhagic stroke risk (RR 2.30, 95% CI: 1.62-3.27). Warfarin heightened overall bleeding risk (RR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03-1.56), but not death (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.37-1.21).Among patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing hemodialysis, use of warfarin is associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke, but did not increase overall mortality.

Effectiveness and Safety of Warfarin in Dialysis Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

In routine practice, warfarin is widely used in dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) for stroke prevention though the ratio of risks to benefits remains unclear. Recent cohort studies investigating the association between warfarin use and the risks of stroke and bleeding in dialysis patients with AF present conflicting results. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of warfarin use in patients with AF undergoing dialysis. Three databases PubMed, EMBASE, and OVID were searched from their inception to August 2015. Observational studies which assessed the ischemic stroke or bleeding risk of warfarin use in dialysis patients with AF were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% con&filig;dence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed based on the Cochrane Q-statistic test and the I statistic. Metaregression analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. A total of 11 eligible studies with 25,407 patients were included in the analysis. Warfarin use, in comparison with no-warfarin use, was not associated with a lower risk for ischemic stroke (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.66-1.35). Sensitivity analyses found results to be robust. Metaregression analysis showed that demographic feature, clinical characteristics, or study-level variable had no impact of warfarin use on stroke risk. In addition, warfarin use was associated with a 27% higher risk for bleeding (95% CI 1.04-1.54). Overall, warfarin use did not have a significant association with reduced mortality (95% CI 0.96-1.11). It appears that warfarin use is not beneficial in reducing stroke risk, but with a high risk for bleeding in dialysis patients with AF. Randomized trials are needed to determine the risk-benefit ratio of warfarin in dialysis patients with AF.

Management of atrial fibrillation in chronic kidney disease: double trouble

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a very well-established link with cardiovascular disease. Below stage 3 CKD (glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min), there is a progressive increase in both total mortality and cardiovascular-specific mortality as kidney function declines; indeed, it is more likely for a patient with CKD stage 3 to die of cardiovascular disease than to progress to CKD stage 4 and beyond. Arrhythmia is particularly common in patients with CKD. Depending on the study and measurement used, the prevalence of patients with CKD with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) is quoted at 7% to 18%, rising to 12% to 25% for those older than 70 years. These rates are up to 2 to 3 times higher than in the general population. Of all patients with AF, 10% to 15% will have CKD. However, not all standard rate and rhythm methods are suitable for this population and those that are tend to be less effective. Meanwhile, anticoagulation has long been a thorny subject, with much conflicting evidence around the balance between bleeding and stroke risk. To help clarify this, we first highlight the challenges of performing evidence-based medicine in the patient with renal disease, and then review recent and emerging research to suggest an approach to the management of patients with renal disease who have AF. We also review the potential role of the different new oral anticoagulant drugs in CKD.

No difference in bleeding risk between subcutaneous enoxaparin and heparin for thromboprophylaxis in end-stage renal disease

Enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight form of heparin, is not approved for use in dialysis patients in the United States, because it is eliminated through the kidneys and could therefore accumulate and cause inadvertent bleeding. Accordingly, it is unknown if enoxaparin is as safe to prescribe as subcutaneous heparin for thromboprophylaxis in patients with chronic renal failure. Here we conducted a retrospective comparative effectiveness study in a large population of chronic maintenance dialysis patients initiated with subcutaneous injections of enoxaparin or heparin for thromboprophylaxis. The primary study end point was hospitalization or death related to bleeding, with a secondary end point of venous thromboembolism. Among 7721 dialysis patients started on subcutaneous enoxaparin or heparin at doses for thromboprophylaxis, the crude rate for bleeding requiring hospitalization or resulting in death was 15.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.7-18.2) events per 100 patient-years in the enoxaparin group, which did not differ from the heparin group in which the crude rate was 16.2 (95% CI 14.0-18.7) events per 100 patient-years. In risk factor-adjusted Poisson models, enoxaparin was not associated with more bleeding in comparison to heparin (risk ratio, 0.98; 95% CI 0.78-1.23). The risk of venous thromboembolism was not associatively worse with enoxaparin (risk ratio, 0.77; 95% CI 0.49-1.22). Thus, in dialysis patients, daily enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis was not associated with increased serious bleeding or less effective compared to subcutaneous heparin.

End-stage renal disease is associated with worse outcomes in hospitalized patients with peptic ulcer bleeding

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at increased risk of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). To our knowledge, there are no population-based studies of the impact of ESRD on PUB.

OBJECTIVE

To determine nationwide impact of ESRD on outcomes of hospitalized patients with PUB.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Hospitals from a 2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

PATIENTS

We used the International Classification of Diseases, the 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify patients who had a primary discharge diagnosis of PUB.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

In-hospital mortality, length of stay, and hospitalization charges.

INTERVENTIONS

Comparison of PUB outcomes in patients with and without ESRD.

RESULTS

Of a total of 102,525 discharged patients with PUB, 3272 had a diagnosis of both PUB and ESRD, whereas 99,253 had a diagnosis of PUB alone without ESRD. The mortality of ESRD patients with PUB was significantly higher than that of the control group without ESRD (4.8% vs 1.9%, P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, patients with PUB and ESRD had greater mortality than patients admitted to the hospital with PUB alone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-3.4), were more likely to undergo surgery (aOR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7), and had a longer hospital stay (aOR 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-2.9). These patients also incurred higher hospitalization charges ($54,668 vs $32,869, P < .01) compared with patients with PUB alone.

LIMITATIONS

Administrative data set.

CONCLUSIONS

ESRD is associated with a significant health care burden in hospitalized patients with PUB. The presence of ESRD contributes to a higher mortality rate, longer hospital stay, and increased need for surgery.

Comparison of safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Anti-Thrombotic Strategy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bivalirudin vs Heparin study)

Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is as effective as unfractionated heparin (UFH), with decreased bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bivalirudin versus UFH in selected PCI patients at high bleeding risk. Four hundred one consecutive patients who underwent PCI fulfilling ≥ 1 enrollment criterion (age >75 years, chronic renal failure, and diabetes mellitus) were randomized to bivalirudin (bolus 0.75 mg/kg followed by infusion during the procedure; n = 198) or UFH (75 IU/kg; n = 203). In the overall population, 39% were aged >75 years, 22% had renal failure, 63% had diabetes, and 29% had acute coronary syndromes. The primary efficacy end point was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization). The primary safety end point was the occurrence of any bleeding or entry-site complications after PCI. All patients were preloaded with clopidogrel 600 mg. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used at the operators' discretion. Thirty-day major adverse cardiac event rates were 11.1% in the bivalirudin group and 8.9% in the UFH group (p = 0.56); the primary efficacy end point was reached mainly because of periprocedural myocardial infarction; 1 patient in the bivalirudin group had stent thrombosis. Occurrence of the primary safety end point was 1.5% in the bivalirudin group and 9.9% in the UFH group (p = 0.0001); this benefit was essentially driven by the prevention of entry-site hematomas >10 cm (0.5% vs 6.9%, p = 0.002). In conclusion, Anti-Thrombotic Strategy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bivalirudin vs Heparin (ARMYDA-7 BIVALVE) indicates that bivalirudin, compared with UFH, causes significantly lower bleeding and has a similar incidence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with older age, diabetes mellitus, or chronic renal failure who undergo PCI.

Risk factors influencing the outcome of peptic ulcer bleeding in end stage renal diseases after initial endoscopic haemostasis

Background and Aims:  Patients suffering from peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding who have end-stage renal disease (ESRD) may encounter more adverse outcomes. The primary objective is to investigate the risk factors that influence the outcomes of ESRD and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with PU bleeding after successful initial endoscopic haemostasis. Methods:  A total of 540 patients with PU bleeding after initial endoscopic haemostasis in a tertiary hospital were investigated retrospectively. They were sorted into three groups after randomised age-matched adjustment: ESRD group (n = 90), CKD group (n = 90) and control group (n = 360). Main outcome measurements were rebleeding, requirement for blood transfusion and surgery, length of hospital stay and mortality. Results:  The rebleeding rates were 43% for the ESRD group vs. 21% for the CKD group vs. 12% for the control group (overall p = < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed the predictors of rebleeding were ESRD, time to endoscope, and non-high-dose proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) users. The risk factors for bleeding-related mortality were presence of moderate degree of CKD and ESRD group, time to endoscope, and Rockall score. All-cause mortality was related to presence of moderate degree of CKD and ESRD group, platelet count, time to endoscope, Rockall score and length of hospital stay. Conclusions:  ESRD patients who suffered from PU bleeding were at risk of excessive rebleeding and mortality with frequent occurrence of delayed rebleeding. This study suggests that early endoscopy for initial haemostasis and high-dose intravenous PPI are associated with the reduction of rebleeding risk especially in patients with high Rockall scores.

A real world report on intravenous high-dose and non-high-dose proton-pump inhibitors therapy in patients with endoscopically treated high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding

Background and Study Aims. The optimal dose of intravenous proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for the prevention of peptic ulcer (PU) rebleeding remains controversial. This study aimed to understand the real world experiences in prescribing high-dose PPI and non-high-dose PPI for preventing rebleeding after endoscopic treatment of high-risk PU. Patients and Methods. A total of 220 subjects who received high-dose and non-high-dose pantoprazole for confirmed acute PU bleeding that were successfully treated endoscopically were enrolled. They were divided into rebleeding (n = 177) and non-rebleeding groups (n = 43). Randomized matching of the treatment-control group was performed. Patients were randomly selected for non-high-dose and high-dose PPI groups (n = 44 in each group). Results. Univariate analysis showed, significant variables related to rebleeding were female, higher creatinine levels, and higher Rockall scores (≧6). Before case-control matching, the high-dose PPI group had higher creatinine level, higher percentage of shock at presentation, and higher Rockall scores. After randomized treatment-control matching, no statistical differences were observed for rebleeding rates between the high-dose and non-high-dose groups after case-control matching. Conclusion. This study suggests that intravenous high-dose pantoprazole may not be superior to non-high-dose regimen in reducing rebleeding in high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic therapy.

Intravenous non-high-dose pantoprazole is equally effective as high-dose pantoprazole in preventing rebleeding among low risk patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer after initial endoscopic hemostasis

BACKGROUND

Many studies have shown that high-dose proton-pumps inhibitors (PPI) do not further reduce the rate of rebleeding compared to non-high-dose PPIs but we do not know whether intravenous non-high-dose PPIs reduce rebleeding rates among patients at low risk (Rockall score < 6) or among those at high risk, both compared to high-dose PPIs. This retrospective case-controlled study aimed to identify the subgroups of these patients that might benefit from treatment with non-high-dose PPIs.

METHODS

Subjects who received high dose and non-high-dose pantoprazole for confirmed acute PU bleeding at a tertiary referral hospital were enrolled (n = 413). They were divided into sustained hemostasis (n = 324) and rebleeding groups (n = 89). The greedy method was applied to allow treatment-control random matching (1:1). Patients were randomly selected from the non-high-dose and high-dose PPI groups who had a high risk peptic ulcer bleeding (n = 104 in each group), and these were then subdivided to two subgroups (Rockall score ≥ 6 vs. < 6, n = 77 vs. 27).

RESULTS

An initial low hemoglobin level, serum creatinine level, and Rockall score were independent factors associated with rebleeding. After case-control matching, the significant variables between the non-high-dose and high-dose PPI groups for a Rockall score ≥ 6 were the rebleeding rate, and the amount of blood transfused. Case-controlled matching for the subgroup with a Rockall score < 6 showed that the rebleeding rate was similar for both groups (11.1% in each group).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous non-high-dose pantoprazole is equally effective as high-dose pantoprazole when treating low risk patients with a Rockall sore were < 6 who have bleeding ulcers and high-risk stigmata after endoscopic hemostasis.

Prothrombotic changes in platelet, endothelial and coagulation function following hemodialysis

PURPOSE

Patients on hemodialysis (HD) have an increased risk of thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction and vascular access thrombosis. The study hypothesis is that a single session of dialysis leads to platelet, endothelial and coagulation activation. Our aim is to determine the effect of a single HD session on prothrombotic vascular biomarkers before and after a single session of hemodialysis.

METHODS

Blood samples were taken from the vascular access of 55 patients immediately before and after a hemodialysis session. Platelet function was assessed by (1) flow cytometric measurement of P-selectin expression and fibrinogen binding +/- ADP stimulation, (2) Ultegra rapid platelet function assay (RPFA) using the agonists thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) and arachidonic acid (AA), (3) soluble P-selectin, and (4) soluble CD40L. Coagulation (thrombin-antithrombin III [TAT] and D-dimer), endothelial von Willebrand factor (vWF) and high sensitivity C-Reactive protein (hsCRP) were assessed by ELISA.

RESULTS

Unfractionated heparin was given to all patients during dialysis and 30 patients (55%) were on antiplatelet agents. Post-hemodialysis there were significant increases in unstimulated platelet P-selectin (p=.037), stimulated P-selectin (p<.001), soluble P-selectin (p<.001) and soluble CD40L (p=.036). Stimulated platelet fibrinogen binding was increased post-hemodialysis (p<.001) but unstimulated fibrinogen binding was unchanged. TRAP- (p<.001] and AA-(p=.009) stimulated aggregation were reduced post-hemodialysis. There were increases post-hemodialysis in TAT (p<.001), D-dimer (p<.001), vWF (p<.001) and hsCRP (p=.011).

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that despite heparin therapy, a single session of HD induced increases in platelet, endothelial, and coagulation activation. More effective medical strategies to reduce the prothrombotic state of patients on hemodialysis should be investigated.

Peptic ulcer bleeding outcomes adversely affected by end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and peptic ulcer disease (PUD) bleeding may be at high risk of bleeding complications.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of patients with ESRD and PUD bleeding.

DESIGN

ESRD patients with PUD bleeding were evaluated retrospectively.

SETTING

Two tertiary, university-affiliated hospitals.

PATIENTS

A total of 150 PUD bleeding patients were evaluated in 3 groups; end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on dialysis (ESRD group) (n = 50) were age matched with patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not requiring dialysis (CKD group) (n = 50) and those with normal kidney function (normal group) (n = 50).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Rebleeding, transfusions, length of hospitalization, mortality.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed significant predictors of rebleeding to be ESRD and high-risk stigmata. The ESRD group had an odds ratio (OR) of 3.8 (95% CI, 1.4-10.5; P = .008) for rebleeding compared with the normal group, and an OR of 3.8 (95% CI, 1.4-10.3; P = .01) compared with the CKD group. The mean number of (+/- SD) transfusions was higher in the ESRD group (6.3 +/- 5.7 units) than in the normal group (3.6 +/- 3.9 units; P = .01). The mean length of hospitalization was higher in the ESRD group than in the normal group (34.0 vs 16.6 days; P = .01). A greater level of comorbidity was the only significant predictor of mortality (OR 6.0; 95% CI, 2.9-12.3; P = .001).

LIMITATION

Retrospective study.

CONCLUSION

ESRD dialysis patients with PUD bleeding have greater rebleeding than patients not on dialysis. ESRD patients should be managed as a high-risk group.

Warfarin use associates with increased risk for stroke in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation

Use of warfarin, clopidogrel, or aspirin associates with mortality among patients with ESRD, but the risk-benefit ratio may depend on underlying comorbidities. Here, we investigated the association between these medications and new stroke, mortality, and hospitalization in a retrospective cohort analysis of 1671 incident hemodialysis patients with preexisting atrial fibrillation. We followed patient outcomes from the time of initiation of dialysis for an average of 1.6 yr. Compared with nonuse, warfarin use associated with a significantly increased risk for new stroke (hazard ratio 1.93; 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 2.90); clopidogrel or aspirin use did not associate with increased risk for new stroke. Analysis using international normalized ratio (INR) suggested a dose-response relationship between the degree of anticoagulation and new stroke in patients on warfarin (P = 0.02 for trend). Warfarin users who received no INR monitoring in the first 90 d of dialysis had the highest risk for stroke compared with nonusers (hazard ratio 2.79; 95% confidence interval 1.65 to 4.70). Warfarin use did not associate with statistically significant increases in all-cause mortality or hospitalization. In conclusion, warfarin use among patients with both ESRD and atrial fibrillation associates with an increased risk for stroke. The risk is greatest in warfarin users who do not receive in-facility INR monitoring.

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet usage associates with mortality among hemodialysis patients

Many prescribe anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications to prevent thromboembolic events and access thrombosis in dialysis patients despite limited evidence of their efficacy in this population. This retrospective cohort study examined whether use of warfarin, clopidogrel, and/or aspirin affected survival in 41,425 incident hemodialysis patients during 5 yr of follow-up. The prescription frequencies for warfarin, clopidogrel, and aspirin were 8.3, 10.0, and 30.4%, respectively, during the first 90 d of initiating chronic hemodialysis. Compared with the 24,740 patients receiving none of these medications, Cox proportional hazards analysis suggested that exposure to these medications was associated with increased risk for mortality (warfarin hazard ratio [HR] 1.27 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18 to 1.37]; clopidogrel HR 1.24 [95% CI 1.13 to 1.35]; and aspirin HR 1.06 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.11]). The increased mortality associated with warfarin or clopidogrel use remained in stratified analyses. A covariate- and propensity-adjusted time-varying analysis, which accounted for longitudinal changes in prescription, produced similar results. In addition, matching for treatment facility and attending physician revealed similar associations between prescription and mortality. We conclude that warfarin, aspirin, or clopidogrel prescription is associated with higher mortality among hemodialysis patients. Given the possibility of confounding by indication, randomized trials are needed to determine definitively the risk and benefit of these medications.

Differential effects of dialysis and ultrafiltrate from individuals with CKD, with or without diabetes, on platelet phosphatidylserine externalization

Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk of cardiovascular events and have elevated externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS; which propagates thrombus formation) in a small subpopulation of platelets. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of 1) removing uremic toxins by hemodialysis on PS externalization in patients with either CKD or CKD and DM and 2) ultrafiltrate (UF) from these individuals on PS externalization in healthy platelets. PS externalization was quantified by a fluorescence-activated cell sorter using annexin V in platelet-rich plasma. PS externalization was elevated threefold in CKD patients and returned to basal values during 3-h hemodialysis. In contrast, it was elevated fivefold in individuals with CKD and DM and was still threefold above control after 3-h treatment. UF significantly increased PS externalization in a small subpopulation of platelets from healthy controls. The effect of UF from individuals with CKD and DM was significantly greater than that from patients with CKD alone, and the responses were partially inhibited by the protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ) inhibitor rottlerin and the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A/2Creceptor antagonist ritanserin. The data suggest that uremic toxins present in UF mediate PS externalization in a small subpopulation of platelets, at least in part, via the 5-HT2A/2Creceptor and PKCδ and demonstrate that DM further enhances platelet PS externalization in CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis. This may explain, at least in part, the additional increase in vascular damage observed in CKD patients when DM is present.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia complicating hemodialysis

Hemodialysis complicated by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare event requiring anticoagulation with direct-thrombin inhibitors. Contaminant calcific uremic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis) further complicates this situation due to the possibility that warfarin anticoagulation may exacerbate skin necrosis. The authors report a patient with renal failure and calciphylaxis who developed HIT after starting hemodialysis. She was successfully treated with Argatroban.

Acquired platelet dysfunction

Acquired platelet dysfunction is encountered frequently in clinical practice. The usual clinical presentation is that of mucosal bleeding, epistaxis, or superficial epidermal bleeds. Often, the dysfunctional platelets are related to a medication or a systemic disorder. Normally, when platelets are exposed to damaged endothelium, they adhere to the exposed basement membrane collagen and change their shape from smooth disks to spheres with pseudopodia. Then, they secrete the contents of their granules, a process referred to as the release reaction. Additional platelets form aggregates on those platelets that have adhered to the vessel wall. As a result, the primary hemostatic plug is formed, and bleeding is arrested. This article reviews the various forms of acquired platelet dysfunction that result in decreased platelet aggregation, adhesion, or secretion.

Reduction in platelet activation by citrate anticoagulation does not prevent intradialytic hemodynamic instability

BACKGROUND

The etiology of intradialytic hemodynamic instability is multifactorial. Of the various factors involved, a rise in core temperature seems to be crucial. In this respect, the bioincompatibility of hemodialysis (HD) treatment might play an important role. The application of cool dialysate reduces the number of periods of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) considerably. In rats, roller pump perfusion caused hypotension by shear stress induced platelet aggregation and subsequent serotonin release. During clinical HD, citrate anticoagulation abolished platelet activation almost completely. Hence, citrate anticoagulation might reduce IDH, whereas the beneficial effect of cool dialysate might be partly explained by reduced platelet activation.

METHODS

In the present study, blood pressure, IDH episodes, platelet activation, platelet aggregation, and serotonin release were studied crossover in 10 patients during HD with dalteparin anticoagulation at normal and low dialysate temperatures and during HD with citrate.

RESULTS

Citrate strongly reduced platelet activation, but did not improve IDH. The blood pressure was best preserved during cool-temperature HD, despite manifest platelet activation. Platelet activation was not accompanied by a rise in the plasma serotonin concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Three major conclusions can be drawn: (1) it is unlikely that platelet activation and subsequent serotonin release underlie IDH in the clinical situation; (2) the protective effects of cool dialysate on IDH appear to be independent of HD-induced platelet activation, and (3) extrapolating results from rat experiments to the human situation requires uppermost prudence.

Evidence-based treatment recommendations for uremic bleeding

Uremic bleeding syndrome is a recognized consequence of renal failure and can result in clinically significant sequelae. Although the pathophysiology of the condition has yet to be fully elucidated, it is believed to be multifactorial. This article is a review of both the normal hemostatic and homeostatic mechanisms that operate within the body to prevent unnecessary bleeding, as well as an in-depth discussion of the dysfunctional components that contribute to the complications associated with uremic bleeding syndrome. As a result of the multifactorial nature of this syndrome, prevention and treatment options can include one or a combination of the following: dialysis, erythropoietin, cryoprecipitate, desmopressin, and conjugated estrogens. Here, these treatment options are compared with regard to their mechanism of action, and onset and duration of efficacy. An extensive review of the clinical trials that have evaluated each treatment is also presented. Lastly, we have created an evidence-based treatment algorithm to help guide clinicians through most clinical scenarios, and answered common questions related to the management of uremic bleeding.

Propyl gallate-induced platelet aggregation in patients with end-stage renal disease: The influence of the haemodialysis procedure

BACKGROUND

Platelet dysfunction is a well-established disturbance in haemodialysis (HD) patients. Propyl gallate is a synthetic platelet activator with the property to stimulate platelet aggregation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of a single haemodialysis session on propyl gallate-induced platelet aggregation.

METHODS

Thirty-nine HD patients were enrolled in the study and 20 healthy volunteers were studied as controls. Cellulose diacetate (CD) dialysers were used in 20 patients and polysulphone dialysers in 19. HD was performed via an A-V fistula in 27 patients and via an i.v. catheter in 12. Erythropoietin was administered in 37 patients (epoietin-alpha in 24 and darbepoietin in 13). Thirty-four were receiving the low-molecular-weight heparin tinzaparin. Propyl gallate slide aggregometry was used for evaluating platelet aggregation.

RESULTS

In HD patients, platelet aggregation was impaired before as well as after the HD session. No effect of the HD procedure, type of vascular access, adequacy of HD or type of erythropoietin on the propyl gallate-induced platelet aggregation was detected. Platelet aggregation was higher when CD dialyser was used. A negative correlation between the time needed for platelet aggregation to occur and tinzaparin dose was found.

CONCLUSION

Propyl gallate-induced platelet aggregation in HD patients is impaired. Platelet aggregation was higher in patients dialysed with CD membrane than in those dialysed with polysulphone membrane. The higher the dose of tinzaparin, the higher the platelet aggregation. The clinical significance of the above results needs further evaluation.

Thrombosis in end-stage renal disease

Although renal failure has classically been associated with a bleeding tendency, thrombotic events are common among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A variety of thrombosis-favoring hematologic alterations have been demonstrated in these patients. In addition, "nontraditional" risk factors for thrombosis, such as hyperhomocysteinemia, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and malnutrition, are present in a significant proportion of chronic dialysis patients. Hemodialysis (HD) vascular access thrombosis, ischemic heart disease, and renal allograft thrombosis are well-recognized complications in these patients. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are viewed as rare in chronic dialysis patients, but recent studies suggest that this perception should be reconsidered. Several ESRD treatment factors such as recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) administration, dialyzer bioincompatibility, and calcineurin inhibitor administration may have prothrombotic effects. In this article we review the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of thrombosis in ESRD and evaluate the evidence that chronic renal failure or its management predisposes to thrombotic events.

Biphasic effects of hemodialysis on platelet reactivity in patients with end-stage renal disease: a potential contributor to cardiovascular risk

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is rampant in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and increased platelet reactivity may contribute. This study is designed to determine effects of hemodialysis in patients with ESRD on platelet reactivity per se.

METHODS

Platelet reactivity was determined by flow cytometry in 36 patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. Blood was obtained from arterial and venous ends of the hemodialysis circuit at the beginning and end of the dialysis session. Platelet reactivity was defined with respect to capacity to bind fibrinogen (activation of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa) and expression of P-selectin in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP; 0, 0.2, and 1.0 micromol/L). Comparison studies were performed with 55 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and 38 healthy subjects.

RESULTS

Platelet reactivity was increased by exposure to the dialysis circuit (capacity to bind fibrinogen: arterial, 28% +/- 13%; venous, 47% +/- 20%; P < 0.001). Despite this effect, surface expression of P-selectin in response to 1 micromol/L of ADP was lower at the end of the dialysis session (arterial blood at its onset, 40% +/- 16%; arterial blood at its conclusion, 24% +/- 15%; P < 0.05). Confocal microscopy showed increased nonspecific association of fibrinogen with platelets after dialysis, suggesting that increased aggregation after dialysis may be secondary to effects of dialysis on fibrinogen binding, rather than on platelet reactivity. Platelet reactivity was increased similarly in patients with ESRD and those with CAD compared with healthy subjects.

CONCLUSION

Although interaction between platelets and the dialysis circuit increases platelet reactivity, continued dialysis decreases platelet reactivity.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome in children: platelet aggregation and membrane glycoproteins

PURPOSE

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the fibrin-platelet thrombosis at the microcirculation level in the different clinical conditions of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). The relationships between platelet structure and function during the first 4 weeks of evolution of the disease were studied to understand the mechanism of platelet alteration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Coagulation parameters, platelet counts, and aggregation were studied in 49 children, and membrane glycoproteins (GPs) in 20 of the 49 children (mean age, 17 months) with HUS (Group 2) were studied during the first 4 weeks of evolution of the disease.

RESULTS

No disseminated intravascular coagulation was found in patients with recurrent or persistent thrombocytopenia. Platelet aggregation was sequentially performed during the first weeks of evolution. All patients had a functional decrease in the acute period of HUS. Platelet GPs GPIb, GPIIbIIIa, GPIIb, and GPIIIa were evaluated. GPIIbIIIa complex presented low level and never reached normal values during the first 4 weeks of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Platelet alterations are probably caused by multiple mechanisms: "exhausted" platelets, structural membrane alterations caused by arginine-glycine-aspartic peptide blockade, or diminished or nonfunctional membrane GPIb and GPIIbIIIa complexes.

The role of flow cytometry in improving biocompatibility in transfusion medicine

In transfusion medicine, blood and blood components, donors and patients are increasingly confronted with biomaterials. The need to understand the response of human blood to contact with these artificial surfaces has led to multiple studies on the biocompatibility of biomaterials. Up to this time, these investigations have predominantly been performed using physical, immunological and biochemical methods. Many of these approaches are useful in investigating the multiple factors involved in blood-biomaterial interactions. However, they always reflect the overall behaviour of whole cellular populations in local or systemic reactions. The application of multiparameter flow cytometry, on the other hand, provides insight into antigenic expression and changes at the single-cell level. Therefore, the technique of flow cytometry represents a new and powerful way of analysing and improving the biocompatibility of these materials in blood-contacting applications in this field.

Flow cytometric analysis of platelet membrane antigens during and after continuous-flow plateletpheresis

BACKGROUND

The influence, extent, and duration of changes in platelet antigen expression caused by blood-biomaterial interaction in plateletpheresis were assessed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-two apheresis donors were studied by using two automated continuous-flow apheresis devices. Blood samples were taken before, during, and for 4 days after extracorporeal circulation. The platelet surface expression of glycoproteins CD41a, CD42b, CD62p, and CD63 was analyzed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Over the course of plateletpheresis, there was a significant increase in mean channel fluorescence intensity (MCFI) of CD62p, from 25.1 +/- 7.9 (mean +/- SD) to 50.4 +/- 28.9, and of CD63, from 22.3 +/- 6.5 to 33.3 +/- 13.2. There was a significant decrease in CD41a expression as measured by the MCFI, from 1129.8 +/- 125.0 to 1066.6 +/- 102.2, and in CD42b MCFI, from 329.6 +/- 49.4 to 321.4 +/- 52.0. The two apheresis devices showed different platelet activation kinetics, but the overall MCFI of CD62p and CD63 did not significantly diverge after 60 minutes of apheresis. CD62p and CD63 expression as measured by the MCFI returned to preapheresis levels during the follow-up period in 25 and 25 of 44 procedures, respectively, within 24 hours; in 10 and 13 of 44 procedures after 48 hours; in 7 and 3 of 44 procedures after 72 hours; and in 2 and 3 of 44 procedures on Day 5.

CONCLUSION

The varying kinetics of expression, as measured by the MCFI, of platelet antigens CD62p, CD63, CD41a, and CD42b during extracorporeal circulation may be useful for biocompatibility testing. Activated platelets continue to circulate in donors for several days after cytapheresis, which suggests that a sufficient interval between apheresis procedures is necessary to avoid the collection of activated platelets.

In vivo evaluation of platelet activation by different cellulosic membranes

This study was undertaken to evaluate platelet activation in vivo induced by different cellulosic membranes by measuring the expression of P-selectin on the platelet surface during hemodialysis in 9 uremic patients. Hollow fiber dialyzers of similar surface with different cellulosic membranes (Cuprophan, cellulose acetate, cellulose triacetate, and Hemophan) were evaluated and compared to a synthetic membrane (polysulfone). Blood samples were obtained before hemodialysis and from the efferent and afferent limbs 5 min after the beginning of dialysis. P-selectin exposure was evaluated by flow cytometry (FACScan) using a monoclonal antibody (RUU 2.17). The percentage of platelets expressing P-selectin before hemodialysis and the percentage from the arterial line during hemodialysis were similar. All membranes evaluated induced platelet activation (estimated as the increase in percentage of platelets expressing P-selectin in samples obtained from the venous line with respect to the arterial line). Cuprophan induced more platelet activation than any other membrane (p < 0.05). The activation induced by cellulose acetate and cellulose triacetate membranes was also higher than that observed with Hemophan (p < 0.05). Hemophan-induced platelet activation was similar to that of polysulfone. These results indicate that all cellulosic membranes induce platelet activation during hemodialysis although there are quantitative differences among them. While Cuprophan induced the highest degree of platelet activation, Hemophan was the only cellulosic membrane that showed a degree of platelet activation similar to the biocompatible membrane polysulfone.

Increased reticulated platelets in dialysis patients

The purpose of this study was to measure the percent reticulated platelets and platelet counts in patients on chronic hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and normal volunteers. The relationship between the percent reticulated platelets and the platelet count can then be used to determine the rate of platelet turnover. Platelet rich plasma was obtained, platelets were fixed and incubated with thiazole orange and analyzed for the percent reticulated platelets by flow cytometry. Normal controls had a mean of 2.77 +/- 0.17% reticulated platelets while peritoneal dialysis patients had a mean percent reticulated platelets of 6.92 +/- 0.68 (P < 0.00001). Chronic hemodialysis patients had a mean percent reticulated platelets of 8.21 +/- 0.36 (P < 0.00001 vs. normal controls and P = 0.05 vs. peritoneal dialysis patients). Platelet counts did not differ significantly among the three groups. The identity of reticulated platelets was confirmed in experiments measuring platelet specific glycoproteins, experiments using RNase, and in mixing experiments with normal and uremic platelets and plasma. We conclude that dialysis patients have a marked increase in circulating reticulated platelets compared to normal controls, indicating accelerated platelet turnover. Increased platelet activation and turnover may contribute to the qualitative platelet dysfunction observed in dialysis patients.

Uremic patients have decreased shear-induced platelet aggregation mediated by decreased availability of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptors

Bleeding and platelet dysfunction are prominent features of uremia. Sh ear-induced platelet aggregation (SIPA) involves the interaction of von Willebrand factor (vWF) with platelet membrane glycoproteins (GP) Ib and IIb-IIIa, the same receptor-ligand pair involved in in vivo adhesion and aggregation of platelets in the arterial circulation. We have used a modified rotational cone-plate viscometer to measure SIPA and calcium flux in platelets. Flow cytometric analysis of the surface expression of GP Ib and IIb-IIIa was performed using flourescein isothiocyanate-conjugated monoclonal antibodies CD42b and CD41a, respectively. Uremic patients showed decreased SIPA (controls, 43% +/- 2% [mean +/- SEM]; chronic renal failure patients, 36% +/- 3%; chronic hemodialysis patients, 26% +/- 2%; P < 0.001) along with a decrease in GP IIb-IIIa (controls, chronic renal failure patients, and chronic hemodialysis patients, 840 +/- 25, 649 +/- 42, 661 +/- 38 mean flourescence intensity, respectively; P < 0.0001). Glycoprotein Ib in uremic patients was not significantly different from normal. Chronic hemodialysis patients also demonstrated increased platelet-bound fibrinogen (P < 0.001) and platelet-bound vWF (p < 0.01). Calcium flux and thromboxane B(2) generation during SIPA of uremic platelets was normal. However, uremic plasma showed twice the normal concentration of vWF (P < 0.001) and sodium dodecyl sulfate agarose gel electrophoresis revealed the presence of fibrinogen fragments. Mixing experiments demonstrated an inhibitory effect of uremic plasma on SIPA of normal platelets (decreased from 39% +/- 3% at baseline to 31% +/- 3% after incubation in uremic plasma) along with an activation-independent increase in platelet-bound fibrinogen and platelet-bound vWF. When uremic platelets were incubated in normal plasma, their SIPA increased from 12% +/- 5% at baseline to 18% +/- 4% after incubation in normal plasma; (P = 0.002), although it did not return to normal. These results suggest that the uremic platelet dysfunction results from decreased GP IIb-IIa availability due to receptor occupancy by fibrinogen fragments (and possibly vWF fragments).