CA-15.3, TPA and MCA as markers for breast cancer

Paradoxical mitotic exit induced by a small molecule inhibitor of APC/CCdc20

The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is a ubiquitin ligase that initiates anaphase and mitotic exit. APC/C is activated by Cdc20 and inhibited by the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), which delays mitotic exit when the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is activated. We previously identified apcin as a small molecule ligand of Cdc20 that inhibits APC/C^Cdc20 and prolongs mitosis. Here we find that apcin paradoxically shortens mitosis when SAC activity is high. These opposing effects of apcin arise from targeting of a common binding site in Cdc20 required for both substrate ubiquitination and MCC-dependent APC/C inhibition. Furthermore, we found that apcin cooperates with p31^comet to relieve MCC-dependent inhibition of APC/C. Apcin therefore causes either net APC/C inhibition, prolonging mitosis when SAC activity is low, or net APC/C activation, shortening mitosis when SAC activity is high, demonstrating that a small molecule can produce opposing biological effects depending on regulatory context.

Analytical and clinical evaluation of a new tumor marker in breast cancer: CA 27.29

Evaluation of a radioimmunoassay for a new tumor marker, named CA 27.29, recently proposed for use in breast cancer patients, is reported in this study. After considering the analytical performance, the clinical study was directed to a control group of 66 apparently healthy subjects (Controls), a group of 25 women with benign breast disease (BBD) and a group of 164 breast cancer patients divided into primary before any treatment (M-), in follow-up with no evidence of disease (NED) and presence of metastases (M+). When compared to CA 15.3, our results showed similar sensitivity of both markers with a slightly lower specificity for CA 27.29. In some cases, however, CA 27.29 elevation appears earlier than CA 15.3 as a sign of metastases. We thus propose their associated use.

Intensive post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients with tumour markers: CEA, TPA or CA15.3 vs MCA and MCA-CA15.3 vs CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel in the early detection of distant metastases

Background

In breast cancer current guidelines do not recommend the routine use of serum tumour markers. Differently, we observed that CEA-TPA-CA15.3 (carcinoembryonic (CEA) tissue polypeptide (TPA) and cancer associated 115D8/DF3 (CA15.3) antigens) panel permits early detection and treatment for most relapsing patients. As high sensitivity and specificity and different cut-off values have been reported for mucin-like carcinoma associated antigen (MCA), we compared MCA with the above mentioned tumour markers and MCA-CA15.3 with the CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel.

Methods

In 289 breast cancer patients submitted to an intensive post-operative follow-up with tumour markers, we compared MCA (cut-off values, ≥ 11 and ≥ 15 U/mL) with CEA or CA15.3 or TPA for detection of relapse. In addition, we compared the MCA-CA15.3 and CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panels.

Results

Distant metastases occurred 19 times in 18 (6.7%) of the 268 patients who were disease-free at the beginning of the study. MCA sensitivity with both cut-off values was higher than that of CEA or TPA or CA15.3 (68% vs 10%, 26%, 32% and 53% vs 16%, 42%, 32% respectively). With cut-off ≥ 11 U/mL, MCA showed the lowest specificity (42%); with cut-off ≥ 15 U/mL, MCA specificity was similar to TPA (73% vs 72%) and lower than that of CEA and CA15.3 (96% and 97% respectively). With ≥ 15 U/mL MCA cut-off, MCA sensitivity increased from 53% to 58% after its association with CA15.3. Sensitivity of CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel was 74% (14 of 19 recurrences). Eight of the 14 recurrences early detected with CEA-TPA-CA15.3 presented as a single lesion (oligometastatic disease) (5) or were confined to bony skeleton (3) (26% and 16% respectively of the 19 relapses). With ≥ 11 U/mL MCA cut-off, MCA-CA15.3 association showed higher sensitivity but lower specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value than the CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel.

Conclusion

At both the evaluated cut-off values serum MCA sensitivity is higher than that of CEA, TPA or CA15.3 but its specificity is similar to or lower than that of TPA. Overall, CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel is more accurate than MCA-CA15.3 association and can "early" detect a few relapsed patients with limited metastatic disease and more favourable prognosis. These findings further support the need for prospective randomised clinical trial to assess whether an intensive post-operative follow-up with an appropriate use of serum tumour markers can significantly improve clinical outcome of early detected relapsing patients.

Value of carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratins for the detection of recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative serial assay of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratins for the detection of recurrent disease in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma after radical surgery.

METHODS: Between 1993 and 2000, 120 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent radical surgery in the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Federal University of São Paulo-Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil. Periodic postoperative evaluation was performed by assaying markers in peripheral serum, colonoscopy and imaging examination. Presence of CEA was detected using the Delfia^® method with 5 μg/L threshold, and cytokeratins using the LIA-mat^® TPA-M Prolifigen^® method with 72 U/L threshold.

RESULTS: In the first postoperative year, patients without recurrent disease had normal levels of CEA (1.5 ± 0.9 μg/L) and monoclonal tissue polypeptide antigen-M (TPA-M, 64.4 ± 47.8 U/L), while patients with recurrences had high levels of CEA (6.9 ± 9.8 μg/L, P < 0.01) and TPA-M (192.2 ± 328.8 U/L, P < 0.05). During the second postoperative year, patients without tumor recurrence had normal levels of CEA (2.0 ± 1.8 μg/L) and TPA-M (50.8 ± 38.4 U/L), while patients with recurrence had high levels of CEA (66.3 ± 130.8 μg/L, P < 0.01) and TPA-M (442.7 ± 652.8 U/L, P < 0.05). The mean follow-up time was 22.3 mo. There was recurrence in 23 cases. Five reoperations were performed without achieving radical excision. Rises in tumor marker levels preceded identification of recurrences: CEA in seven (30%) and TPA-M in eleven individuals (48%).

CONCLUSION: Intensive follow-up by serial assay of CEA and cytokeratins allows early detection of colorectal neoplasm recurrence.

Cytokeratins and carcinoembryonic antigen in diagnosis, staging and prognosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the serum levels of cytokeratins and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in diagnosis, staging and prognosis of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS: The sample consisted of 169 patients. One hundred blood donors formed the control group. Radical surgery was performed on 120 patients, with an average follow-up duration of 22.3 mo. Relapses occurred in 23 individuals after an average of 18.09 mo. CEA was assayed via the Delfia^® method with a limit of 5 ng/mL. Cytokeratins were assayed via the LIA-mat^® TPA-M Prolifigen^® method with a limit of 72 U/L.

RESULTS: In the diagnosis of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, CEA showed a sensitivity of 56%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 94%, a negative predictive value of 50% and an accuracy of 76.8%. TPA-M had a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 96%, a positive predictive value of 97%, a negative predictive value of 66% and an accuracy of 93.6%. The elevation of one of the markers was shown to have a sensitivity of 76.9%, a specificity of 91%, a positive predictive value of 93.5%, a negative predictive value of 70% and an accuracy of 83.6%. There was no variation in the levels of the markers according to the degree of cell differentiation while there was an elevation in their concentrations in accordance with the increase in neoplastic dissemination. There was a statistically significant difference between the patients with stage IV lesions and those with stages I, II and III tumors. With regard to CEA, the average level was 14.2 ng/mL in patients with stage I lesions, 8.5 ng/mL in patients with stage II lesions, 8.0 ng/mL in patients with stage III lesions and 87.7 ng/mL in patients with stage IV lesions. In relation to TPA-M, the levels were 153.1 U/L in patients with stage I tumors, 106.5 U/L in patients with stage II tumors, 136.3 U/L in patients with stage III tumors and 464.3 U/L in patients with stage IV tumors. There was a statistical difference in patients with a high CEA level in relation to a shorter survival (P<0.05). However, there was no correlation between patients with high TPA-M levels and prognostic indices of patients undergoing radical surgery.

CONCLUSION: Cytokeratins demonstrate a greater sensitivity than CEA in the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma. There is an increase in the sensitivity of the markers with tumor dissemination. Cytokeratins cannot identify the worse prognosis in patients undergoing radical surgery. Cytokeratins constitute an advance in the direction of a perfect tumor marker in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.

Overexpression of human carcinoma-associated antigen in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

CONTEXT

Human carcinoma-associated antigen (HCA) is a mucin protein whose level is increased in the sera of patients with a variety of carcinomas. We have previously shown that prostatic carcinoma overexpresses HCA in comparison to benign prostatic tissue. To our knowledge, expression of HCA in other tumors has not been reported previously.

OBJECTIVE

The current study was designed to determine if HCA is overexpressed in urothelial carcinoma (UCa) of the bladder.

DESIGN

Forty cystectomy specimens with UCa were selected, of which 27 cases had invasive UCa, 21 cases had a noninvasive component, and 36 cases had benign urothelium. Seven cystectomy specimens with benign conditions were chosen as controls. Anti-HCA monoclonal antibody HAE3 was used for immunohistochemical staining. Results were recorded as positive (> or =5% of cells staining and staining intensity 2+ or 3+) or negative (<5% of cells staining or staining intensity <2+) and analyzed using the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

HAE3 staining was positive in 67% of invasive UCa, 29% of noninvasive UCa, but only 5% of benign urothelium specimens. The difference in HCA expression between benign urothelium and UCa and that between invasive and noninvasive UCa was statistically significant (P =.008). No statistically significant difference was found between low-grade and high-grade noninvasive papillary UCa (P =.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Human carcinoma-associated antigen is selectively overexpressed in a significant number of cases of UCa of the bladder, suggesting the potential utility of monitoring the serum and/or urine levels of HCA in monitoring patients with HCA-positive UCa for recurrence or progression.

Monitoring different stages of breast cancer using tumour markers CA 15-3, CEA and TPA

The ability of the tumour markers Cancer Antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), and Tissue Polypeptide Antigen (TPA) to signal progression in breast cancer patients was investigated in this study. Marker interpretation considered the analytical variation, intra-individual biological variation, and the rate of increase. Patient cohorts were as follows: (A) 90 stage II breast cancer patients who were monitored postoperatively, (B) 204 recurrent breast cancer patients who were monitored during first-line chemotherapy, and (C) 112 patients who were monitored during the time period after first-line chemotherapy. The sensitivity for progression was 44% (cohort A), 69% (cohort B), and 68% (cohort C) without any false progression signals. Marker lead-times exceeded 3 months in 20% (cohort A) and 27% (cohort C) of patients. Marker lead-times were 1-6 months among 33% of the patients receiving first-line chemotherapy (cohort B). Trials are necessary to determine whether tumour marker-guided therapy has any prognostic impact. The data suggest that tumour marker information may be used to stop ineffective treatments and reduce unnecessary adverse effects.

Description of a Computer Program to Assess Cancer Antigen 15.3, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Tissue Polypeptide Antigen Information during Monitoring of Metastatic Breast Cancer

It is time-consuming to process and compare the clinical and marker information registered during monitoring of breast cancer patients. To facilitate the assessment, we developed a computer program for interpreting consecutive measurements. The intraindividual biological variation, the analytical precision profile, the cutoff limit, and the detection limit for each marker are entered and stored in the program. The assessment procedure for marker signals considers the analytical and biological variation of the applied markers. The software package contains a database that can store the interpretation of the measurements as evaluation codes together with patient demographics, information about treatment type, dates for treatment periods, control periods, and evaluation codes for clinical activity of disease. The consecutive concentrations for a patient are imported temporarily into the program from outside sources and presented graphically. Marker concentrations to be compared are selected with the computer mouse and the significance of the difference is calculated by the program. The program has an option for calculating the lead time of marker signals vs clinical information. The program facilitates the monitoring of individual breast cancer patients with tumor marker measurements. It may also be implemented in trials investigating the utility of potential new markers in breast cancer as well as in other malignancies.

Progression Criteria for Cancer Antigen 15.3 and Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Metastatic Breast Cancer Compared by Computer Simulation of Marker Data

Background: We investigated the utility of computer simulation models for performance comparisons of different tumor marker assessment criteria to define progression or nonprogression of metastatic breast cancer.

Methods: Clinically relevant values for progressive cancer antigen 15.3 and carcinoembryonic antigen concentrations were combined with representative values for background variations in a computer simulation model. Fifteen criteria for assessment of longitudinal tumor marker data were obtained from the literature and computerized. Altogether, 7200 different patients, each based on 50 measurements, were simulated. With a sampling interval of 4 weeks, the monitoring period for each event was ∼3.8 years.

Results: Modulation of the background variation, the starting concentrations, and the cutoffs enabled identification of criteria that were robust against false-positive signals of progression.

Conclusions: The computer simulation model is a fast, effective, and inexpensive approach for comparing the diagnostic potential of assessment criteria during clinically relevant conditions of steady-state and progressive disease. The model systems can be used to generate tumor marker assessment criteria for a variety of malignancies and to compare and optimize their diagnostic performance.

Serum markers for monitoring of prostatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Serum TPS (tissue polypeptide-specific antigen) has been observed to be characteristic of carcinoma proliferation, and increased levels of TPS seem to be closely related to tumor progression. In this study we wanted to evaluate the importance of the tumor-marker TPS in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with prostatic carcinoma, and to compare it with prostate-specific antigen (PSA).

METHODS

We considered 39 patients with clinically confined disease, who underwent neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and thereafter radical prostatectomy, and 45 patients who did not undergo surgery and underwent hormonal adjuvant therapy alone. PSA and TPS were measured at the time of diagnosis and at regular intervals in the follow-up; TPS was measured in a control group of patients as well.

RESULTS

We were able to observe that, in untreated patients, PSA correlates with clinical stage, increasing with increasing tumor stage; a similar correlation was not observed when considering TPS. After androgen ablation we observed a decrease in PSA, but the serum values of TPS remained higher, suggesting that activity still exists inside the tumor. The evaluation of TPS appeared to be of particular interest in the follow-up after radical prostatectomy, especially in patients undergoing hormonal therapy; in fact, we were able to observe that relapse of the disease can be suspected early by the increase of TPS in hormonally treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We assert that TPS can add useful information on the state of neoplastic illness, especially in patients following adjuvant androgen-suppressive hormonal therapy, after radical prostatectomy; serial measurements of this marker could be useful in the early diagnosis of a relapse.

The correlation of CA15.3 and TPS with tumor course in patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study was performed to determine the correlation of CA15.3 and TPS with disease course in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Levels of CA15.3 and tissue polypeptide antigen using the M3 monoclonal antibody (TPS) were determined in the serum of 60 patients with metastatic breast cancer. CA15.3 and TPS were measured at two assay times.

RESULTS

A change of more than 25% in the serum level of CA15.3 or TPS was highly correlated with tumor response. The association between response and change in marker levels was stronger for CA15.3 (P = 0.0001) than for TPS (P = 0.0005). Distinct mismatches between marker changes and the tumor response were observed for both CA15.3 and TPS.

CONCLUSION

CA15.3 and TPS are useful in the determination of response to treatment. Because of observed disagreement, marker changes can only be regarded as indicative of disease course.

Clinical evaluation of potential usefulness of CEA, CA 15-3, and MCA in follow-up of breast cancer patients

The potential usefulness of MCA, CA 15-3 and CEA in monitoring of breast cancer patients was evaluated in 135 female patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer. The patients were classified into two groups as follows: group of patients with no evidence of disease, NED; and group of patients with progressive disease, PD. In total, 2106 measurements of CEA, CA 15-3, and MCA were performed using an enzyme immunoassay. Serum levels of all three markers in the NED group differed significantly from those of patients with PD. The observed differences in the sensitivity and specificity of CEA, CA 15-3, and MCA tests were not significant. The serum concentrations of a particular marker correlated well with the concentrations of the other two markers, except when CEA was correlated with MCA or CA 15-3 in NED group patients. The elevation of tumor markers preceded by some 7 months the clinical evidence of dissemination, and marker levels reflected at a high percentage the response to therapy in PD patients. Therefore, this clinical study confirmed that MCA, CA 15-3 and also CEA are suited to discriminate between disease and disease-free periods, and also validated the usefulness of markers for treatment response monitoring.

Clinical value of CA 15-3, mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen, tumor polypeptide antigen, and carcinoembryonic antigen in monitoring early breast cancer patients

A total of 209 postsurgical breast cancer patients were prospectively monitored with simultaneous serum level estimations of CA 15,3, mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen (MCA), tumor polypeptide antigen (TPA), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA); 141 (67.5%) were free of recurrence and 68 (32.5%) developed metastases during the follow-up. The mean values of tested tumor markers differed significantly in those with progressive disease compared with those free of disease recurrence. The sensitivity of tumor markers were CA 15-3, 68.2%; CEA, 34.1%; MCA, 72.7%; and TPA, 72.7%. The combination of CA 15-3 with TPA or MCA with TPA showed a trend for improved sensitivity of both markers (p = 0.06), with no specific loss of specificity (p = 0.11). The addition of CEA to CA 15-3 or MCA does not provide additional information for clinical evaluation. Patients with elevated tumor marker determinations had significantly shorter survival than those with values within the normal range. Two serial, progressively increasing values of tumor markers during the follow-up strongly predict recurrence. This study indicates that the comeasurement of CA 15-3 with TPA or MCA with TPA is justifiable in monitoring breast cancer patients postoperatively.

Value of CA 15.3 in breast cancer and comparison with CEA and TPA: a study of specificity in disease-free follow-up patients and sensitivity in patients at diagnosis of the first metastasis

The specificity and sensitivity of a tumor marker (TM) are important in establishing its potential clinical utility for a specific type of neoplasm. CA 15.3 is a TM specific for breast cancer; it is defined by two monoclonal antibodies (DF3 and 115D8), whose specificity, in disease-free follow-up patients, and sensitivity, in patients at diagnosis of first metastasis, have been evaluated in the present study and compared with those of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA). Serum concentrations of all three TMs were quantified in 618 individuals: 80 healthy controls, 421 patients with local breast cancer who became free of disease following locoregional treatment, and 117 patients with disseminated disease at diagnosis of metastasis. Radioimmunoassay (RIA) was the method employed, and the cut-off values obtained were 30 U/ml for CA 15.3, 5 ng/ml for CEA, and 120 U/I for TPA. The results showed CA 15.3 and CEA specificities to be analogous (95.7 and 95.5%, respectively). TPA specificity (81.9%) was lower (p < 0.001). During adjuvant therapy, CA 15.3 serum levels were seen to increase, followed by a normalization of concentration after terminating therapy. On the other hand, CA 15.3 and TPA sensitivities (64.1 and 67.5%, respectively) were greater than for CEA (44.4%, p < 0.01). It is concluded that CA 15.3 is a useful TM for breast cancer, as it offers a greater sensitivity than CEA and a higher specificity than TPA. Combining CA 15.3 and CEA fails to increase CA 15.3 sensitivity, while combining CA 15.3 with TPA increases false-positives and so likewise offers no additional benefit.

Serum tumor marker kinetics and the clinical course of patients with advanced breast cancer

Serum carcinoembryonic antigens (CEA), CA 15-3, and tissue polypeptide antigens (TPA) have been used in monitoring the clinical course of patients with breast cancer. However, recent reports have suggested that the serial levels of these markers during therapy do not always correlate with the response to therapy. To clarify the usefulness of the serial combination assay of these markers in monitoring the clinical course of patients during therapy, we investigated the relationship between the initial changes and the kinetic patterns of the markers after therapy and the objective responses. When an increase or decrease of over 20% in these markers is taken to be significant, then the initial changes in all three markers significantly correlated with the therapeutic responses (P < 0.01). Five distinct kinetic patterns in the marker levels were observed. A paradoxical kinetic pattern of CEA and CA 15-3 levels--that is, an "initial surge and subsequent drop"--was seen in one-third of the responders. The TPA levels tended to exhibit a "steady decline" pattern in those responders. The sensitivity and specificity of the kinetic patterns to predict the clinical courses were significantly higher than those obtained from the analysis of initial changes. These findings thus suggest that adequate knowledge of the unique kinetics of each marker may help to make a more accurate prediction of the therapeutic responses.

Interval breast cancers are not biologically distinct--just more difficult to diagnose

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer diagnosed within 1 year of a negative annual screening examination is called interval breast cancer (IBC) and is considered to be a more virulent subtype of disease.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical data on 24 women who were diagnosed as having IBC while participating in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project at Ellis Fischel Cancer Hospital and the Women's Cancer Control Program screening project in Columbia, Missouri, between 1974 and 1992. We reinterpreted mammograms from the visit prior to the diagnosis of IBC for possible misdiagnosis, changes suggestive of malignancy, and Wolfe's patterns. Archival paraffin blocks from 19 patients were used to determine qualitative expression of tumor markers.

RESULTS

Observed 5-, 8-, and 10-year survival rates were identical to published data for patients with non-IBC. Seventy-four percent of the mammograms evidenced dysplastic Wolfe's patterns (P2 and DY), and one patient was found retrospectively to have shown evidence of cancer which was missed. Compared to breast cancers in general, fewer IBC tumors expressed tumor markers associated with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival rates and tumor marker expressions in this retrospective cohort suggest that IBC tumors are not more biologically aggressive than noninterval tumors. They are more difficult to diagnose both by physical examination and mammography.

Serum CA549 in primary breast cancer: comparison with CA15.3 and MCA

We carried out a comparison of three commonly used mucin markers, CA549, CA15.3 and MCA. Serum samples from 184 healthy women and 237 patients with primary breast cancer were evaluated. The markers were measured using commercially available immunometric assays. Like CA15.3 and MCA, CA549 was significantly associated with tumour size and lymph node status, being an effective indicator of tumour bulk. CA549 was significantly correlated with both CA15.3 and MCA. Positive/negative concordance rate was very good (93.7%) between CA549 and MCA. Conversely, CA15.3 was positive and CA549 negative in 20.4% of cases. Axillary status was not significantly different in the latter group of patients and in cases in which CA15.3 and CA549 showed concordant results. From the present findings we draw the following major conclusions: 1. CA549 and MCA are highly correlated and their association should not provide additional information; however, they should not be considered interchangeable since they may behave differently in individual cases. 2. CA549 and CA15.3, although well correlated, are discordant in a significant number of cases. Longitudinal studies are needed to verify the usefulness of the association between the two markers. 3. The three evaluated mucin markers are not interchangeable in individual patients; if a patient is monitored with a marker, she should be followed up with the same marker.

Treatment of disease-negative but mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen-positive breast cancer patients with tamoxifen: preliminary results of a prospective controlled randomized trial

Increasing levels of tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen, mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen (MCA), CA 15.3, and monoclonal antibody H23 in breast cancer patients following the treatment of the primary disease and adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy reflect subclinical development of metastatic disease. Overt metastatic disease is usually incurable and prolongation of life at this stage is impossible, and the treatment is only palliative. The efficacy of tamoxifen, a least-toxic agent, in the treatment of early and minimal metastatic disease detected only by increasing serum levels of MCA was studied prospectively in a randomized study. Our preliminary, albeit encouraging, results showed that the rate of relapse within a median follow-up period of 11 months was 24.1% in the control arm as compared with 0% in the tamoxifen arm (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.012). None of the patients with a relapse had positive progesterone receptors (PR). We may carefully conclude that early treatment may be warranted in young patients with negative PR and continuously increasing serum levels of the marker.

[CA 15-3 and breast cancer]

The precise clinical value of CA 15-3 antigen has yet to be determined. With no role in screening for early breast cancer and, even if CA 15-3 seems to be correlated with bulky initial tumor burden, it appears to have no independent prognostic value. The clinical interest of CA 15-3 remains the early detection of the first recurrence. In this regard, more than 75% of first recurrences (all sites included) are associated with a significant rise in CA 15-3 levels, with a particular sensitivity for bone, liver, and lung metastases but which appears lower for locoregional recurrences. More sensitive and specific than CEA, and this whatever the site of recurrence, the rise of CA 15-3 may precede the clinically or radiologically diagnostic of recurrence by a mean lead time from 6 to 9 months. Furthermore CA 15-3 is a reliable marker for clinical course and seems to be of potential interest in monitoring disease follow-up during therapy. In the situation of a clinically isolated elevation of CA 15-3, which investigations, if any, have to be done?, and if negative must do we initiate a treatment for a "biological recurrence"? All these questions remain still opened, and today on consensual attitude can be recommended. In this issue, only results of well-designed prospective trials could help us to determine more rationally, an optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.

A novel method for monitoring high-risk breast cancer with tumor markers: CA 15.3 compared to CEA and TPA

BACKGROUND

An early and reliable diagnosis of metastatic spread has increased interest in serum tumor markers. This study investigated the ability of CA 15.3, CEA, and TPA to identify, predict, and exclude metastases in bone/viscera during adjuvant treatment and follow-up of high-risk breast cancer.

METHODS

Ninety females with high-risk breast cancer were included in the study. Response evaluation was based upon clinical examination, x-rays or histology and elaborated marker criteria.

RESULTS

During the marker monitoring period, metastases in four patients were confined to skin or lymph nodes, 21 developed metastases to bone/viscera, and 65 females had no evidence of metastases. CA 15.3, CEA, and TPA correctly classified 48%, 10%, and 19% of the patients with metastases in bone/viscera, and 100%, 94%, and 98% without. Following CA 15.3, CEA, and TPA recurrence, 100%, 33%, and 60% of the patients developed metastases in bone/viscera. Metastases in bone/viscera were excluded in 86%, 76%, and 79% of patients without CA 15.3, CEA, and TPA recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Only CA 15.3 gave reliable information about recurrence. Metastases in bone/viscera were identified in 10 of the 21 patients with CA 15.3. There was no false-positive CA 15.3 information on the 65 patients without clinical recurrence. The PVneg (86%) indicated that when CA 15.3 did not signal recurrence, metastases to bone/viscera were not likely.

Tissue Polypeptide Antigen Immunostaining in Fine Needle Aspirates from Solid Breast Nodules

the purpose of this study was to determine the role of Tissue Polypeptide Antigen (TPA) immunostaining in the evaluation of aspiration smears from solid breast nodules and to discuss its possible clinical applications. Seventy-one cytologic specimens were studied; 52 were carcinomas, 15 fibroadenomas and 4 fibrocystic dysplasia. TPA was visualized with the peroxidaseantiperoxidase method, using 3-3 ‘diaminobenzidine as chromogen and hematoxylin as counterstaining. The incidence of TPA-positive aspiration smears was 88.5% in the carcinomas and 26.7% in the fibroadenomas. The four cases of fibrocystic dysplasia showed variable behaviour. The intensity of the TPA staining varied from – to + + + and was most frequently high in the carcinomas. The results of this research show a good correlation between a diagnosis of carcinoma and TPA positivity in fine needle aspirates of solid breast nodules.

Clinical use of tumor markers in oncology

The perfect tumor marker would be one that was produced solely by a tumor and secreted in measurable amounts into body fluids, it should be present only in the presence of cancer, it should identify cancer before it has spread beyond a localized site (i.e., be useful in screening), its quantitative amount in bodily fluids should reflect the bulk of tumor, and the level of the marker should reflect responses to treatment and progressive disease. Unfortunately, no such marker currently exists, although a number of useful but imperfect markers are available. The predominant contemporary markers are discussed here by chemical class, as follows: glycoprotein markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), and prostate specific antigen (PSA); mucinous glycoproteins, including CA 15-3, CA 19-9, mucinous-like cancer antigen and associated antigens, and CA 125; enzymes, including prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), neuron specific enolase (NSE), lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH), and placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP); hormones and related endocrine molecules, including calcitonin, thyroglobulin, and catecholamines; and, molecules of the immune system, including immunoglobulins and beta-2-microglobulin. The biologic properties of each group of tumor markers are discussed, along with our assessment of their role in clinical medicine today.

Serial serum MCA measurements in the follow-up of breast cancer patients

Mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen (MCA) was serially assayed in 58 women with histologically proven breast cancer after their treatment for primary disease. MCA sensitivity and specificity were 87.5% and 76.9%, respectively, and the positive predictive value 82.4%. 10 patients had elevated MCA and no evidence of disease (NED) during their follow-up, of whom 4 finally developed overt metastases. The 4 had a mean (S.D.) MCA value of 46.48 (18.26) U/ml during the lead time, versus 18.76 (2.69) U/ml in the other 6, who are still at high risk for developing overt metastases. Raised levels of MCA in patients with NED create a dilemma of "treat" versus "wait and see". Early treatment of patients with serially uprising MCA levels should be evaluated in a prospective randomised study to assess its ability to prevent or delay the development of overt metastatic disease and influence survival.