Chapter 8 What do amacrine cells do?

The temporal structure of transient ON/OFF ganglion cell responses and its relation to intra-retinal processing

A subpopulation of transient ON/OFF ganglion cells in the turtle retina transmits changes in stimulus intensity as series of distinct spike events. The temporal structure of these event sequences depends systematically on the stimulus and thus carries information about the preceding intensity change. To study the spike events' intra-retinal origins, we performed extracellular ganglion cell recordings and simultaneous intracellular recordings from horizontal and amacrine cells. Based on these data, we developed a computational retina model, reproducing spike event patterns with realistic intensity dependence under various experimental conditions. The model's main features are negative feedback from sustained amacrine onto bipolar cells, and a two-step cascade of ganglion cell suppression via a slow and a fast transient amacrine cell. Pharmacologically blocking glycinergic transmission results in disappearance of the spike event sequence, an effect predicted by the model if a single connection, namely suppression of the fast by the slow transient amacrine cell, is weakened. We suggest that the slow transient amacrine cell is glycinergic, whereas the other types release GABA. Thus, the interplay of amacrine cell mediated inhibition is likely to induce distinct temporal structure in ganglion cell responses, forming the basis for a temporal code.

Retinal GABA(A) receptors participate in the regulation of circadian responses to light

A role for retinal gamma-aminobutyric acid Type A (GABA(A)) receptors in the regulation of circadian responses to light was examined. Intraocular injections of the GABA(A) antagonist, bicuculline, were performed during the early (Circadian Time [CT] 13.5) and late subjective night (CT 20), followed by a light pulse. Bicuculline significantly decreased the magnitude of phase delays induced by light to 65%, whereas it had no effect on phase advances. To explore the nature of the inhibition elicited by bicuculline, an intensity-response curve was performed. Intraocular injections of bicuculline inhibited phase delays only when induced by high-saturating light illuminances (20 and 100 lux). No effect was observed at light intensities < or = 5 lux. These results suggest that retinal GABA(A) receptors modulate the responsivity of the circadian system to light.

Correlations between cholinergic neurons and muscarinic m2 receptors in the rat retina

Acetylcholine is well established as the neurotransmitter of starburst amacrine cells in the vertebrate retina but their function is poorly understood. We compared the distribution of muscarinic m2 receptors in the rat retina with the localization of the starburst cell processes. mAChR2 immunoreactivity appeared in a central band in the inner plexiform layer, which did not co-localize with the processes of the cholinergic amacrine cells. We found co-labelling of VAChT and ChAT making it highly unlikely that there are undetected cholinergic neurons in rat retina. Most mAChR2 receptors were located far from the cholinergic neurons, suggesting that most of them are unlikely to be associated with conventional cholinergic synapses.

Processing of color- and noncolor-coded signals in the gourami retina. II. Amacrine cells

The same set of stimuli and analytic methods that was used to study the dynamics of horizontal cells () was applied to a study of the response dynamics and signal processing in amacrine cells in the retina of the kissing gourami, Helostoma rudolfi. The retina contains two major classes of amacrine cells that could be identified from their morphology: C and N amacrine cells. C amacrine cells had a two-layered dendritic field, whereas N cells had a monolayered dendritic field. Both types of amacrine cell were tracer-coupled but coupling was more extensive in the N amacrine cells. Responses from C amacrine cells lacked a DC component and had a small linear component that was <10% in terms of mean square error (MSE); the second-order component often accounted for >50% of the modulation response. The C amacrine cells did not show any characteristic color coding under any stimulus condition. Most responses of N cells to a pulsatile stimulus consisted of a series of depolarizing transient potentials and steady illumination did not generate any DC potential in these cells. The response to a white-noise modulated input was composed of well-defined first- and second-order components and, possibly, higher-order components. The response evoked by a red or green white-noise-modulated stimulus given alone was not color coded. Modulated red illumination in the presence of a green illumination elicited a color-coded response from >70% of N amacrine cells. Color information was carried not only by the polarity but also by the dynamics of the first-order component. No convincing evidence was obtained to indicate that the second-order component might be involved in color processing. Some N amacrine cells produced a well-defined (second-order) interaction kernel to show that the temporal sequence of red and green stimuli was a parameter to be considered. In a complex cell such as an amacrine cell, responses evoked by a pulsatile stimulus given in darkness and by modulation of a mean luminance could be very different in terms of their characteristics. It was not always possible to predict the response evoked by one stimulus from observing the cell's response to another stimulus. This is because, in N cells, a flash-evoked (nonsteady state) response is composed largely of nonlinear components whereas a modulation (steady state) response is composed of linear as well as nonlinear components.

Dopaminergic and GABAergic retinal cell populations in mammals

A number of modern techniques now allow histologists to characterize subpopulations of retinal neurons by their neurotransmitters. The morphologies and connections of these chemically defined neurons can be analyzed precisely at both light and electron microscope levels and lead to a better understanding of retinal circuitry. The dopaminergic neurons form a loose population of special wide-field amacrine cells bearing intraretinal axons within the inner plexiform layer. One subtype, the interplexiform cell, sends an axon to the outer plexiform and outer nuclear layers. The number of interplexiform cells is variable throughout mammalian species. The GABAergic neurons form a dense and heterogeneous population of amacrine cells branching at all levels of the inner plexiform layer. The presence of GABA in horizontal cells seems to be species-dependent. Close relationships occur between dopaminergic and GABAergic cells. GABA antagonizes a number of dopaminergic actions by inhibiting both the release and synthesis of dopamine. This inhibition can be supported by GABA synapses onto dopaminergic cells, but GABA can also diffuse to its targets. Finally, GABA is also contained and synthesized in dopaminergic cells. This colocalization might be the basis of an intracellular modulation of dopamine by GABA.

Unique distribution of somatostatin-immunoreactive cells in the retina of the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri)

Somatostatin-like immunoreactive cells in the tree shrew retina were studied with the monoclonal antibody S8 against the neuropeptide somatostatin 14. As in some other mammals, immunoreactive somata are exclusively found in the ganglion cell layer. Immunoreactive processes form a sparse main plexus in the inner plexiform layer near the border of the inner nuclear layer; fewer additional processes are found closer to the ganglion cell layer. With retrograde labelling of retinal ganglion cells by injections of the tracer Fast Blue into the superior colliculus and lateral geniculate body and counterstaining of the retinae with S8, approximately 5% of the immunoreactive somata were double-labelled at any retinal location. The vast majority of somatostatin-like immunoreactive cells are thus displaced amacrine cells. Their somata are distributed over the entire retina. Their population density is highest in the temporal retina, with peak densities of approximately 5000 cells/mm2 near the central area and a steep density gradient. In the remaining retina densities are 200-400 cells/mm2, falling to approximately 100 cells/mm2 at the retinal margins. This is in stark contrast to the somatostatin-like immunoreactive cells in other mammalian retinae which have densities of 10-40 cells/mm2 and are confined to restricted retinal regions (inferior retina and/or retinal margin).

Neuropeptide Y immunoreactivity identifies a regularly arrayed group of amacrine cells within the cat retina

Retinal amacrine cells can be divided into subgroups on the basis of morphological properties and chemical content. It is likely that these subgroups have specific connections and serve unique functional roles within the inner plexiform layer. In the present study we show that immunoreactivity to neuropeptide Y (NPY) identifies a group of amacrine cells (165,000-170,000) within the adult cat retina. This is the largest group of peptide-containing amacrine cells identified to date in the cat retina. These neurons have small cell bodies and are regularly spaced at all retinal eccentricities examined. The density of NPY-immunoreactive cells, as well as their regular spacing, suggests that these neurons form a specific subgroup of the amacrine cell class and are likely to serve a unique role in the transfer of visual information through the inner plexiform layer.