Contextual dependence of steroid receptor function on an androgen-responsive enhancer

Hormone-dependent medial preoptic/lumbar spinal cord/autonomic coordination supporting male sexual behaviors

Testosterone (T) can act directly through neural androgen receptors (AR) to facilitate male sexual behavior; however, T's metabolites also can play complicated and interesting roles in the control of mating. One metabolite, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) binds to AR with significantly greater affinity than that of T. Is that important behaviorally? Another metabolite, estradiol (E), offers a potential alternative route of facilitating male mating behavior by acting through estradiol receptors (ER). In this review we explore the roles and relative importance of T as well as E and DHT at various levels of the neuroaxis for the activation of male sex behavior in common laboratory animals and, when relevant research findings are available, in man.

Androgen regulation of the TMPRSS2 gene and the effect of a SNP in an androgen response element

More than 50% of prostate cancers have undergone a genomic reorganization that juxtaposes the androgen-regulated promoter of TMPRSS2 and the protein coding parts of several ETS oncogenes. These gene fusions lead to prostate-specific and androgen-induced ETS expression and are associated with aggressive lesions, poor prognosis, and early-onset prostate cancer. In this study, we showed that an enhancer at 13 kb upstream of the TMPRSS2 transcription start site is crucial for the androgen regulation of the TMPRSS2 gene when tested in bacterial artificial chromosomal vectors. Within this enhancer, we identified the exact androgen receptor binding sequence. This newly identified androgen response element is situated next to two binding sites for the pioneer factor GATA2, which were identified by DNase I footprinting. Both the androgen response element and the GATA-2 binding sites are involved in the enhancer activity. Importantly, a single nucleotide polymorphism (rs8134378) within this androgen response element reduces binding and transactivation by the androgen receptor. The presence of this SNP might have implications on the expression and/or formation levels of TMPRSS2 fusions, because both have been shown to be influenced by androgens.

Characterization of cis elements of the probasin promoter necessary for prostate-specific gene expression

BACKGROUND

The androgen-regulated probasin (PB) promoter has been used extensively to target transgenes to the prostate in transgenic mice; however, limited data exist on the mechanism that dictates prostate-specific gene expression. Tissue-specific gene expression involves synergistic effects among transcription factors associated in a complex bound to cis-acting DNA elements.

METHODS

Using comprehensive linker scan mutagenesis, enzyme mobility shift and supershift assays, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and transgenic animal studies, we have extensively characterized the prostate-specific PB promoter.

RESULTS

We identified a series of nonreceptor transcription factors that are bound to the prostate-specific rat PB promoter. These factors include several ubiquitously distributed proteins known to participate in steroid receptor-mediated transcription. In addition, we identified two tissue-specific DNA elements that are crucial in directing prostate-specific PB expression, and confirmed the functional importance of both elements in transgenic animal studies. These two elements are functionally interchangeable and can be bound by multiple protein complexes, including the forkhead transcription factor FoxA1, a "pioneer factor" that has a restricted distribution to some cells type that are ectoderm and endoderm in origin. Using transgenic mice, we further demonstrate that the minimal PB promoter region (-244/-96 bp) that encompasses these tissue-specific elements results in prostate-specific gene expression in transgenic mice, contains androgen receptor and FoxA1-binding sites, as well as ubiquitous transcription factor binding sites.

CONCLUSION

We propose that these sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, including tissue-restricted and ubiquitous factors, create the first level of transcriptional control, which responds to intracellular pathways that directs prostate-specific gene expression.

Functional interplay between two response elements with distinct binding characteristics dictates androgen specificity of the mouse sex-limited protein enhancer

Many of the aspects involved in steroid-specific transcriptional regulation are still unsolved to date. We describe here the detailed characterization of the mouse sex-limited protein enhancer as a paradigm for androgen-specific control of gene expression. By deletion analysis, we delineate the minimal enhancer region displaying androgen sensitivity and specificity. We also show that each of the three hormone response elements (HRE), which constitute this minimal enhancer region, is essential but not sufficient for its functionality. When investigated as isolated elements, HRE1 is inactive and HRE3 is a potent androgen response element as well as GRE. Only the non-canonical HRE2 (5-TGGTCAgccAGTTCT-3') is capable of conferring an androgen-specific transcriptional response to a heterologous promoter. This finding is correlated with the fact that HRE2 is recognized in binding assays in vitro by the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of the androgen but not the glucocorticoid receptor, while HRE3 is recognized by both DBDs. Differential binding of the androgen receptor to HRE2 in the context of the enhancer was analyzed in more detail in footprinting assays in vitro. In transient transfection experiments using chimeric receptors, the inability of the glucocorticoid receptor to transactivate via the slp-ARU as well as the isolated slp-HRE2 was rescued by the replacement of its DNA-binding domain with that of the androgen receptor. Our data suggest that the functional interplay between the weak, but highly androgen-specific HRE2 and the adjacent strong, but non-selective HRE3 is the major determinant in the generation of androgen specificity of transcriptional response via the sex-limited protein enhancer.

Dependence of selective gene activation on the androgen receptor NH2- and COOH-terminal interaction

The agonist-induced androgen receptor NH(2)- and COOH-terminal (N/C) interaction is mediated by the FXXLF and WXXLF NH(2)-terminal motifs. Here we demonstrate that agonist-dependent transactivation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and probasin enhancer/promoter regions requires the N/C interaction, whereas the sex-limited protein gene and mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat do not. Transactivation of PSA and probasin response regions also depends on activation function 1 (AF1) in the NH(2)-terminal region but can be increased by binding an overexpressed p160 coactivator to activation function 2 (AF2) in the ligand binding domain. The dependence of the PSA and probasin enhancer/promoters on the N/C interaction for transactivation allowed us to demonstrate that in the presence of androgen, the WXXLF motif with the sequence (433)WHTLF(437) contributes as an inhibitor to AR transactivation. We further show that like the FXXLF and LXXLL motifs, the WXXLF motif interacts in the presence of androgen with AF2 in the ligand binding domain. Sequence comparisons among species indicate greater conservation of the FXXLF motif compared with the WXXLF motif, paralleling the functional significance of these binding motifs. The data provide evidence for promoter-specific differences in the requirement for the androgen receptor N/C interaction and in the contributions of AF1 and AF2 in androgen-induced gene regulation.

Androgen receptor interactions with Oct-1 and Brn-1 are physically and functionally distinct

POU domain proteins interact positively or negatively with steroid hormone receptors, depending on the precise array of these and other factors assembled on target gene promoters. Octamer transcription factor 1 (Oct-1), a ubiquitous POU factor, is implicated in androgen induction of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene based on protein-DNA interaction studies. However, direct evidence for a role of Oct-1 in the hormone response has been difficult to obtain. Brain 1 (Brn-1), another POU factor, is more tissue-specific, expressing in brain and also in kidney, which is a major site of Slp synthesis. We compared the interaction of the androgen receptor (AR) with Oct-1 and Brn-1 to reveal the more likely candidate for regulation of Slp. In transfection, addition of either Oct-1 or Brn-1 reduced AR activation, regardless of the presence of an octamer-like sequence in the enhancer, suggesting interference was indirect. However, when the octamer-like element was changed to a consensus octamer site, Brn-1, but not Oct-1, strongly enhanced androgen activation. This correlated with Brn-l's preference for the consensus octamer sequence in DNA binding assays. Direct interaction of AR with glutathione-S-transferase-(GST)-fused Oct-1 was DNA-dependent, while Brn-l-AR association was not. Chimeric Brn-1 and Oct-1 POU domains demonstrated that the DNA-dependent AR interaction relied on the origin of the POU homeodomain. However, in the context of full-length Brn-1 and Oct-1 chimeric proteins, the POU homedomain was not sufficient to confer the distinct behaviors of these factors in vivo, but instead revealed the importance of an N-terminal transactivation domain in Brn-1. These results demonstrate that functional interaction of Oct-1 and Brn-1 with AR is determined by the precise sequence of the octamer binding site, and by differential interaction of the POU factors with AR and other components of the transcriptional machinery.

Oct-1 preferentially interacts with androgen receptor in a DNA-dependent manner that facilitates recruitment of SRC-1

Gene regulation by steroid hormone receptors depends on the particular character of the DNA response element, the array of neighboring transcription factors, and recruitment of coactivators that interface with the transcriptional machinery. We are studying these complex interactions for the androgen-dependent enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene. This enhancer has, in addition to multiple androgen receptor (AR)-binding sites, a central region (FPIV) with a binding site for the ubiquitous transcription factor Oct-1 that appears crucial for hormonal regulation in vivo. To examine the role of Oct-1 in androgen-specific gene activation, we tested the interaction of Oct-1 with AR versus glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in vivo and in vitro. Oct-1 coimmunoprecipitated from cell lysates with both AR and GR, but significant association with AR required both proteins to be DNA-bound. This was confirmed by sensitivity of the protein association to treatment with ethidium bromide or micrococcal nuclease. Addition of DNA to micrococcal nuclease-treated samples restored interaction, even when binding sites were on separate DNA molecules, suggesting association was due to direct protein-protein interaction and not indirect tethering via the DNA. AR/GR chimeras revealed that interaction of the N and C termini of AR was required to communicate the DNA-bound state that enhances interaction with Oct-1. Protease digestion assays of hormone-bound receptors revealed further conformational changes in the ligand binding domain of AR, but not GR, upon DNA binding. Furthermore, these conformational changes led to increased interaction with the coactivator SRC-1, via the NID 4 domain, suggesting DNA binding facilitates recruitment of SRC-1 by the AR-Oct-1 complex. Altogether, these results suggest that the precise arrangement of binding sites in the Slp enhancer ensures proper hormonal response by imposing differential interactions between receptors and Oct-1, which in turn contributes to SRC-1 recruitment to the promoter.

The androgen receptor (AR) amino-terminus imposes androgen-specific regulation of AR gene expression via an exonic enhancer

Androgen and glucocorticoid receptor (AR, GR), two closely related members of the nuclear receptor superfamily, can recognize a similar cis-acting DNA sequence, or hormone response element (HRE). Despite this apparent commonality, these receptors regulate distinct target genes in vivo. The AR gene itself is regulated by AR but not GR in a variety of cell types, including osteoblast-like cells, as shown here. To understand this specificity, we first identified the DNA sequences responsible for androgen-mediated up-regulation of AR messenger RNA. A 6.5-kb region encompassing exon D, intron 4, and exon E of the AR gene contains four exonic HREs and exhibits cell type-specific, AR-mediated transcriptional enhancement when placed upstream of a heterologous promoter and reporter gene. A 350-bp fragment consisting of just exons D and E exhibits the same cell- and androgen-specificity as the 6.5-kb region, as well as the native AR gene. Consistent with a role for the exonic HREs, androgen regulation via this intragenic enhancer requires the HREs as well as a functional receptor DNA binding domain. A panel of AR/GR chimeric receptors was used to test which AR domains (amino-terminal, DNA binding or ligand binding) confer androgen-specific regulation of the 350-bp enhancer. Only chimeric receptors containing the amino-terminus of AR induced reporter gene activity from the AR gene enhancer. Further, a constitutively active AR consisting of only the AR amino-terminus and DNA binding domain (AA phi) retained the capacity to activate the internal responsive region, unlike a constitutively active chimera harboring the GR amino-terminus and AR DNA binding domain (GA phi). Thus, the AR amino terminus is the sole determinant for androgen-specific regulation of the AR gene internal enhancer. These findings support a model in which the amino termini of ARs bound to HREs within the AR gene interact with an exclusive auxiliary factor(s) to elicit androgen-specific regulation of AR messenger RNA. This is the first example of androgen-specific response in which the necessary and sufficient distinguishing capacity resides within the AR amino terminus.

Functional interaction of human Cdc37 with the androgen receptor but not with the glucocorticoid receptor

Cdc37 is a molecular chaperone closely associated with the folding of protein kinases. Results from studies using a yeast model system showed that it was also important for activation of the human androgen receptor (AR). Based on results from the yeast model system (Fliss, A. E., Fang, Y., Boschelli, F., and Caplan, A. J. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 2501-2509), we initiated studies to address whether AR and Cdc37 interact with each other in animal cell systems. Our results show that Cdc37 binds to AR but not to glucocorticoid receptors (GR) synthesized in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. This binding occurs via the ligand-binding domain of the AR in a manner that is partially dependent on Hsp90 and the presence of hormone. Further studies using the yeast system showed that Cdc37 is not interchangeable with Hsp90, suggesting that it functions at a distinct step in the activation pathway. Expression of a dominant negative form of Cdc37 in animal cells down-regulates full-length AR but has very little effect on an AR truncation lacking the ligand-binding domain or full-length GR. These results reveal differences in the mechanisms by which AR and GR become active transcription factors and strengthen the notion that Cdc37 has a wider range of polypeptide clients than was realized previously.

Change of specificity mutations in androgen-selective enhancers. Evidence for a role of differential DNA binding by the androgen receptor

The androgen and glucocorticoid receptors recognize identical DNA motifs, leaving unanswered the question of how steroid specificity of transcriptional regulation is established in cells containing both receptors. Here, we provide evidence that subtle differences in low affinity DNA recognition might be a crucial element in the generation of steroid-specific responses. Here we identify simple hormone response elements in the mouse sex-limited protein enhancer and the human secretory component androgen response unit to be essential for the androgen specificity of both enhancers. We describe specific in vitro binding to these motifs by the DNA-binding domain of the androgen but not the glucocorticoid receptor. Both elements can be considered partial direct repeats of the 5'-TGTTCT-3' core binding motif. In addition, we show that specific point mutations in their left half-sites, essentially changing the nature of the repeats, strongly enhance the glucocorticoid sensitivity of the respective enhancers, whereas they have no effect on their androgen responsiveness. Accordingly, these mutations allow specific binding of the glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding domain to both elements in vitro. With these experiments, we demonstrate that differential recognition by the androgen receptor of nonconventional steroid response elements is, at least in some cases, an important mechanism in androgen-specific transcriptional regulation.

Differential regulation of testosterone vs. 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone by selective androgen response elements

There are two major physiological androgens, testosterone (T), and 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), which induce different responses in mammals. These androgens regulate the target gene transcription via binding to and activating the same androgen receptor (AR). The molecular mechanisms that differ between these two very close androgens through the same AR protein to target the distinct genomic responses remain unknown. Using yeast genetic selection, we identified two kinds of androgen response elements (ARE), which could respond differentially to T vs. DHT. These two AREs also show different T- vs. DHT-induced AR transactivation in mammalian Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells in terms of copy number and comparisons with the classic mouse mammary tumor virus ARE. Together, our results suggest that the selective ARE sequence may play an important role in the differential T- vs. DHT-induced AR transactivation.

AML3/CBFalpha1 is required for androgen-specific activation of the enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene

A complex 120-base pair enhancer, derived from the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene, is activated solely by the androgen receptor (AR) in specific tissues, although it contains a hormone response element recognized by several steroid receptors. The generation of this transcriptional specificity has been ascribed to the interactions of the receptor with tissue-specific nonreceptor factors bound to accessory sites within the enhancer. Protein-DNA interaction assays revealed two factors binding the 5' part of the enhancer that differ widely in abundance between cells showing AR-specific activation of the Slp element compared with those that also permit activation by glucocorticoid receptor (GR). The factor designated B formed a complex centered on the sequence TGTGGT, a core motif recognized by members of the AML/CBFalpha transcription factor family. This complex was competed by a high affinity binding site specific for AML/CBFalpha and was specifically supershifted by an antibody to AML3/CBFalpha1, placing factor B within the AML3/CBFalpha1 subclass. Interestingly, this factor was shown to bind to a second site in the 3' part of the enhancer, positioned between the two critical AR binding sites. Transfection studies revealed that AML1-ETO, a dominant-negative AML/CBFalpha construct, abrogated AR induction of the enhancer, but not of simple hormone response elements. Furthermore, overexpression of AML3/CBFalpha1 could rescue the AML1-ETO repression. Finally, glutathione S-transferase-AML/CBFalpha fusion proteins demonstrated direct interaction between AML/CBFalpha and steroid receptors. Although this interaction was equivalent between AML1/CBFalpha2 and AR or GR, AML3/CBFalpha1 showed stronger interaction with AR than with GR. These data demonstrate that AML3/CBFalpha1 is functionally required for hormonal induction of the Slp enhancer and that direct, preferential protein-protein interactions may contribute to AR-specific activation. These results demonstrate an intriguing role of AML3/CBFalpha1 in steroid- as well as tissue-specific activation of target genes.

Estrogenic and antiestrogenic activities of 16alpha- and 2-hydroxy metabolites of 17beta-estradiol in MCF-7 and T47D human breast cancer cells

The comparative mitogenic activities of 17beta-estradiol (E2) and four metabolites, 2-hydroxyestradiol (2-OHE2), 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1), 16alpha-hydroxyestradiol (16alpha-OHE2) and 16alpha-hydroxyestrone (16alpha-OHE1) were determined in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive MCF-7 and T47D human breast cancer cells. E2 (1 nM) induced a 7- to 13-fold increase in cell number in both cell lines compared to untreated cells and the mitogenic potencies of 16alpha-OHE1 or 16alpha-OHE2 were comparable to or greater than E2. In contrast, 2-OHE1 and 2-OHE2 were weak mitogens in both cell lines and in cells cotreated with 1 nM E2 and 100 or 1000 nM 2-OHE1 or 2-OHE2, there was a significant inhibition of hormone-induced cell proliferation. The comparative ER agonist/antagonist activities of E2 and the metabolites on transactivation were determined in T47D cells transiently transfected with constructs containing promoter inserts from the cathepsin D (pCD) and creatine kinase B (pCKB) genes. E2, 16alpha-OHE2 and 16alpha-OHE1 induced reporter gene activity in both MCF-7 or T47D cells transfected with pCKB or pCD. In contrast, 2-OHE1 and 2-OHE2 did not exhibit ER agonist activity for these transactivation assays, but in cells cotreated with E2 plus 2-OHE1 or 2-OHE2, there was a significant decrease in the hormone-induced response. These results demonstrate that 16alpha-OHE1/16alpha-OHE2 exhibit estrogenic activities similar to that observed for E2, whereas the 2-catecholestrogens are weak ER agonists (cell proliferation) or antagonists (cell proliferation and transactivation).

Multiple receptor domains interact to permit, or restrict, androgen-specific gene activation

A critical problem within transcription factor families is how diverse regulatory programs are directed by highly related members. Androgen and glucocorticoid receptors (AR, GR) recognize a consensus DNA hormone response element (HRE), but they activate target genes with precise specificity, largely dependent on the promoter and cell context. We have assessed the role of different receptor domains in hormone-specific response by testing chimeras of AR and GR for their ability to activate the androgen-specific enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene. Although all of the mutant receptors activated simple HREs, only a few activated the androgen-specific element. One component shared by receptors functional on the AR-specific target was the AR DNA binding domain. Activation was not due to differential DNA affinity but rather to the AR DNA binding domain escaping suppression directed at the GR DNA binding domain in this enhancer context. A further mechanism increasing specific activation was cooperation of receptors at multiple and weak HREs, which was accentuated in the presence of both the AR N terminus and ligand binding domain. These domains together increased recognition of weak HREs, as demonstrated by in vitro DNase I footprinting and transactivation of mutant enhancers. Further, AR N-terminal subdomains reported to interact directly with the ligand binding domain relieved an inhibitory effect imposed by that domain. Therefore, functions intrinsic to AR augment steroid-specific gene activation, by evading negative regulation operating on the domains of other receptors and by enhancing cooperativity through intra- and inter-receptor domain interactions. These subtle distinctions in AR and GR behavior enforce transcriptional specificity established by the context of nonreceptor factors.

Regulatory capacity of an androgen-specific enhancer of the mouse Slp gene in transgenic mice

Different steroid hormone receptors can activate transcription from the same hormone response element (HRE) in vitro, but in vivo the effects of each hormone on gene activity are distinct. To determine sequences mediating androgen-specific response in a physiological setting, we placed the androgen-responsive mouse sex-limited protein gene (Slp) enhancer before a tkCAT reporter in transgenic mice. The enhancer contains a consensus HRE plus accessory factor binding sites that act in concert to direct transcription in response to androgen. A 160 bp fragment, C'delta2, is responsive to several steroids in transfection; in transgenic mice, this enhancer was active in several tissues of male and female mice, in four of six transgenic lines. In striking contrast, C'delta9, a 120 bp sub-fragment of C'delta2 that responds only to androgen in transfection, showed activity in testes, prostate and kidney, where it was strongly androgen-inducible in females. However, expression was obtained in only one transgenic line. Multimerization of the C'delta9 enhancer conferred expression in prostate, but again in only one line. The greater penetrance of C'delta2 expression was not driven by glucocorticoids, as adrenalectomy had little effect, but may be dependent on the NF-kappaB-like element absent from the C'delta9 fragment. That two transgenic lines showed expression in androgen target sites driven by enhancers that are androgen-specific in vitro suggested that activation of this enhancer, when it could occur, was in response to androgen. The dramatically different behavior of the two related enhancer sequences underscores the importance of chromosomal context to the activity and specificity of regulatory elements.

Androgen-dependent protein interactions within an intron 1 regulatory region of the 20-kDa protein gene

The 20-kDa protein gene is androgen regulated in rat ventral prostate. Intron 1 contains a 130-base pair complex response element (D2) that binds androgen (AR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) but transactivates only with AR in transient cotransfection assays in CV1 cells using the reporter vector D2-tkCAT. To better understand the function of this androgen-responsive unit, nuclear protein interactions with D2 were analyzed by DNase I footprinting in ventral prostate nuclei of intact or castrated rats and in vitro with ventral prostate nuclear protein extracts from intact, castrated, and testosterone-treated castrated rats. Multiple androgen-dependent protected regions and hypersensitive sites were identified in the D2 region with both methods. Mobility shift assays with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides spanning D2 revealed specific interactions with ventral prostate nuclear proteins. Four of the D2-protein complexes decreased in intensity within 24 h of castration. UV cross-linking of the androgen-dependent DNA binding proteins identified protein complexes of approximately 140 and 55 kDa. The results demonstrate androgen-dependent nuclear protein-DNA interactions within the complex androgen response element D2.

Involvement of an octamer-like sequence within a crucial region of the androgen-dependent Slp enhancer

Androgen dependence of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene is conferred by an enhancer encompassing a consensus hormone response element (HRE) and sites for several nonreceptor factors. The footprint IV (FPIV) region of the enhancer plays a key role in hormone- and tissue-specific response, both in vitro and in vivo. We characterized FPIV-binding factors by methylation interference analysis and UV cross-linking of several complexes evident in gel mobility-shift assays. The footprinting analysis revealed that distinct base contacts within the multiple nuclear protein-DNA complexes occurred primarily within a sequence similar to an octamer transcription factor (Oct-1) binding site. With additional data on approximate molecular weights from UV cross-linking, several plausible candidates were tested for their DNA binding and functional activity at FPIV. Oct-like protein binding in gel-shift assays with several cell and tissue extracts was evident using specific competitors and antibodies, but was lower in affinity for FPIV than for an Oct-1 consensus site. Site-directed mutation of the FPIV sequence to a consensus Oct-1 element within the Slp enhancer context increased Oct-1 binding in vitro, but greatly reduced hormonal induction in vivo. This suggested that Oct-1 is not directly involved in response, or alternatively, that Oct-1 bound to the lower-affinity site interacts with neighboring factors significantly differently than Oct-1 bound to a consensus sequence. A sequence overlapping the Oct-like element that was similar to a hepatic nuclear factor-4 (HNF-4) site showed no ability to bind HNF-4 in vitro, nor the related orphan receptor, chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter factor (COUP-TF). Intriguingly, however, expression of COUP-TF in transfection had a dramatic inhibitory effect on response of the androgen-specific enhancer (C' delta9), but did not affect other enhancer configurations that can also be induced by glucocorticoid (C 'delta2). This underscores that, despite extensive sequence identity of C' delta9 and C' delta2, components of the androgen-specific transcription complex differ significantly from that of one that is more generally steroid responsive.

Steroid hormone responsiveness of a family of closely related mouse proviral elements

Regulation of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene in unusual in that hormone response is conferred by the 5' LTR of an upstream inserted provirus, dubbed the imposon (imp1). In a search for additional genes whose regulation has been affected by retrotransposition events, we isolated two partial proviral elements by stringent screening of a mouse genomic library. One clone (imp2) contained a portion of the envelope gene and a 3' LTR that was nearly identical to the 3' LTR of imp1; this similarity extended to insertion into a B1 repetitive element. The second proviral clone (imp3) contained a 5' LTR and associated coding sequences, but lacked its 3' LTR; the LTR of imp3 differed by 12% from the imp1 sequence. To assess potential hormone response, proviral enhancer regions cloned into reporter vectors were tested in transfection. The imp2 enhancer was similar in behavior to imp1, conferring both androgen and glucocorticoid induction in one fragment context and an androgen-specific response in another. In contrast, the imp3 enhancer allowed high expression in the absence of hormone and was less responsive to steroids in general and androgen in particular. These three proviral elements define a small family of steroid responsive proviruses in the mouse genome, and at least one member has had a lasting impact on an endogenous gene's regulation.