Lipid biosynthesis and deposition in genetically lean and fat chickens. Comparative in vivo studies with 14C acetate

Hepatic lipogenesis in broiler chickens with different fat deposition during embryonic development

In order to identify the genes involved in the fatness variability, we studied the expression of several genes implicated in the hepatic lipid metabolism of broiler chickens with different fat deposition patterns during embryonic development. The mRNA expression of acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACC), fatty acid synthase (FAS), malic enzyme (ME) and apolipoprotein B100 (apoB100) genes were determined using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Samples of livers were collected from Arbor Acres (AA) and Sanhuang (SH) chickens on day 9, 14 and 19 of embryonic development as well as at hatching. This study showed that hepatic triglyceride (TG) level was found to increase suddenly during day 14 of embryonic development, to gradually increase thereafter, and to remain relatively constant at hatching. FAS gene expression in AA and SH broilers occurred prior to hatching and at hatching. The gene was expressed more in the former breed. ACC gene expression was observed beginning at the earlier development stage of days 9. No breed difference was observed in ME and apoB gene expression. This study indicated that the expression of lipogenic enzyme genes of the liver in broiler chickens exhibited scheduling during embryogenesis. The ACC gene started to express earlier than the FAS gene during embryonic development. This suggested that embryonic liver synthesized fatty acid, and breed difference was noticed prior to hatching.

Genetic linkage and expression analysis of SREBP and lipogenic genes in fat and lean chicken

To identify the genes directly responsible, through DNA polymorphism, for the difference in fatness observed between a lean and a fat chicken line, we studied five genes (ACL, ACC, FAS, ME, SCD1) encoding key enzymes involved in liver fatty acid synthesis and secretion. Genetic linkage was tested between polymorphic sites in the genes and the fatness trait segregating in an F2 design obtained by inter-crossing the two fat and lean lines. Despite a confirmation of a higher mRNA level in the fat birds, no genetic linkage of the gene alleles with the phenotype could be found. As a test of the implication of upstream regulatory transcription factors, SREPB genes were also studied. The lack of genetic linkage of SREBP genes with fatness shows that these genes are not directly responsible through polymorphism for fatness variability in our model. Moreover, the similar SREBP mRNA levels observed between the two lines led us to exclude also transcriptional factors regulating the two SREBP genes as being directly responsible for fatness variability. However, the genes involved in post-translational modifications of SREBPs remain candidates to investigate. These results emphasised the interest to perform expression and genetic linkage studies jointly, to progress in identifying the genetic origin of variability of a quantitative trait.

Identifying genes involved in the variability of genetic fatness in the growing chicken

A precise knowledge of the genome involved in the expression of a quantitative trait could provide a useful tool in breeding programs; molecular genetic methods are capable of yielding this kind of information. An experimental procedure is presented here for identifying genes whose expression is related to weight variability of abdominal adipose tissue in the growing chicken. Quantitative traits are the result of metabolic pathways exhibiting some major regulation stages that are controlled genetically. These steps involve genes that may act as "major genes". With regard to chicken fat metabolism, most fatty acids are synthesized in the liver and incorporated into very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles before their secretion into the plasma. Accordingly, the present study focused on the expression of liver genes. The mRNA of lipogenic enzymes (acetyl-coenzyme-A carboxylase, fatty acid synthase, malic enzyme, and delta 9-desaturase) were analyzed. Also studied were apoprotein (apo)A1, apoVLDL-II, and apoB mRNA from 9-wk-old male chickens from two lines selected for high and low abdominal fat pads. Significant differences for apoA1 mRNA levels occurred between fat and lean birds. Moreover, the total quantity of mRNA provided an accurate estimation of the abdominal fat pad (r = .74 with P < .05).

Effect of different dietary levels of protein on fat deposition in broilers divergently selected for high or low abdominal adipose tissue

1. Male broilers selected for high (HF) or low (LF) abdominal fat were fed from 8 to 53 d of age on diets containing different concentrations of protein: according to N.R.C. (1984) recommendations (IP), 14% lower (LP) or 14% higher (HP). 2. The growth of LF birds fed on the LP diet was depressed until 35 d of age, but did not differ from the other groups later on. 3. The HF birds had heavier adipose tissues (AT) (g/kg body weight) than the LF birds. Significant line by diet interactions indicated a difference in magnitude of the response of the lines to dietary protein content. 4. Fat concentration of the AT and skin was higher, and in the tibia lower in the HF than in the LF birds. The fat concentration in liver and in breast muscle was not affected by line or by diet. 5. The ratio of saturated plus monoenoic fatty acids to polyenoic fatty acids, considered as an index of fat synthesis, was higher in the abdominal adipose tissue (AAT) of HF compared with LF birds. In AAT, liver and in breast muscle, this ratio was inversely related to dietary protein content.

Hepatic lipogenesis in genetically lean and fat chickens. In vitro studies

1. Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase, malic enzyme, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase and delta 9-desaturase activity was measured in liver extracts from 5- to 11-week-old genetically lean or fat chickens. 2. A significant difference between the two lines of chickens was shown as concerns desaturating activity only, which was 45% higher in the fat animals than in the lean ones. 3. This result is consistent with the hypothesis of a higher rate of lipoprotein processing and secretion in the liver of the fat line chickens.