Lumbosacral spinal neurons in the cat that are candidates for being activated by collaterals from the spinocervical tract

Spinal cord transection modifies neuronal nitric oxide synthase expression in medullar reticular nuclei and in the spinal cord and increases parvalbumin immunopositivity in motoneurons below the site of injury in experimental rabbits

Using immunohistochemistry, we detected the expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in ventral medullary gigantocellular reticular nuclei and in the lumbosacral spinal cord 10 days after thoracic transection in experimental rabbits. We tried to determine whether neurons located below the site of injury are protected by the calcium binding protein parvalbumin (PV). Changes of nNOS immunoreactivity (IR) in spinal cord were correlated with the level of nNOS protein in dorsal and ventral horns. Ten days after transection, nNOS was upregulated predominantly in lateral gigantocellular nuclei. In the spinal cord, we revealed a significant increase of nNOS protein in the dorsal horn. This is consistent with a higher density of punctate and fiber-like immunostaining for nNOS in laminae III-IV and the up-regulation of nNOS-IR in neurons of the deep dorsal horn. After surgery, the perikarya of motoneurons remained nNOS immunonegative. Contrary to nNOS, the PV-IR was upregulated in α-motoneurons and small-sized neurons of the ventral horn. However, its expression was considerably reduced in neurons of the deep dorsal horn. The findings indicate that spinal transection affects nNOS and PV in different neuronal circuits.

The calcium binding proteins calbindin, parvalbumin, and calretinin have specific patterns of expression in the gray matter of cat spinal cord

Calcium binding proteins (CBPs) regulate intracellular levels of calcium (Ca(2+)) ions. CBPs are particularly interesting from a morphological standpoint, because they are differentially expressed in certain sub-populations of cells in the nervous system of various species of vertebrate animals. However, knowledge on the cellular regulation governing such cell-specific CBP expression is still incomplete. In this work on the L7 segment of the cat spinal cord, we analyzed the localization and morphology of neurons expressing the CBPs calbindin-28 KD (CB), parvalbumin (PV), and calretinin (CR), and co-expressing CB and PV, CB and CR, and PV and CR. Single CBP-positive ((+)) neurons showed specific distributions: (1) CB was present in small neurons localized in laminae I, II, III and X, in small to medium size neurons in laminae III-VI, and in medium to large neurons in laminae VI-VIII; (2) PV was present in small size neurons in laminae III and IV and in medial portions of laminae V and VI, medium neurons and in lamina X at the border with lamina VII, in medium to large neurons in laminae VII and VIII; (3) CR labeling was detected in small size neurons in laminae I, II, III and VIII, in medium to large size neurons in laminae I and III-VII, and in small to medium size neurons in lamina X. Double labeled neurons were a small minority of the CBP(+) cells. Co-expression of CB and PV was seen in 1 to 2% of the CBP(+) cells, and they were detected in the ventral and intermediate portions of lamina VII and in lamina X. Co-localization of CB and CR was present in 0.3% of the cells and these cells were localized in lamina II. Double labeling for PV and CR occurred in 6% of the cells, and the cells were localized in ventral part of lamina VII and in lamina VIII. Overall, these results revealed distinct and reproducible patterns of localization of the neurons expressing single CBPs and co-expressing two of them. Distinct differences of CBP expression between cat and other species are discussed. Possible relations between the cat L7 neurons expressing different CBPs with the neurons previously analyzed in cat and other animals are suggested.

Afferent pain pathways: a neuroanatomical review

Painful experience is a complex entity made up of sensory, affective, motivational and cognitive dimensions. The neural mechanisms involved in pain perception acts in a serial and a parallel way, discriminating and locating the original stimulus and also integrating the affective feeling, involved in a special situation, with previous memories. This review examines the concepts of nociception, acute and chronic pain, and also describes the afferent pathways involved in reception, segmental processing and encephalic projection of pain stimulus. The interaction model of the cerebral cortex areas and their functional characteristics are also discussed.

Effects of upper cervical spinal cord stimulation on neurons in the lumbosacral enlargement of the cat: spinothalamic tract neurons

Extracellular microelectrode recordings were made from deep spinothalamic tract neurons in the lumbosacral spinal cord of cats anaesthetized with chloralose and paralyzed with gallamine triethiodide. The effects of upper cervical spinal cord stimulation were tested on 43 spinothalamic tract neurons, by stimulation of the ipsilateral dorsolateral funiculus at C3 and rostral C1 using five or six shocks at 333 Hz. The strength of cervical stimulation was adjusted so that the C3 shock was above threshold for antidromic activation of spinocervical tract neurons but the same strength of shock applied at C1 was below threshold for the same neurons. Four of the 43 spinothalamic cells (9%) were not influenced by upper cervical stimulation. The remaining 39 spinothalamic tract cells (91%) were all excited from the upper cervical cord. Twenty-seven of these (63%) were excited more strongly from C3 than from C1, 4 (9%) were excited more strongly from C1 than from C3, and the remaining eight cells (19%) showed no significant differences between their responses to stimulation at C1 and C3. There were no obvious differences between those spinothalamic tract neurons showing differential effects from C1 and C3 and those showing no such effects. The neuronal systems possibly responsible for the differential effects from C3 and C1 on spinothalamic tract neurons are discussed. We conclude that the most likely candidate system for the greater excitation from C3 compared with C1 is the subset of spinocervical tract neurons with axon collaterals in the lumbosacral enlargement and that the spinothalamic tract is a further ascending path, in addition to the postsynaptic dorsal column path, that receives excitatory input from spinocervical axon collaterals. The greater excitation from C1 compared with C3 is interpreted as due to excitation from C1 and a mixture of excitation and inhibition from C3. The responsible neuronal systems seem likely to be either the spinocervical neurons with axon collaterals operating on the spinothalamic tract via inhibitory interneurons, or cells in the lateral cervical nucleus with axons descending to the lumbosacral cord.