Bromodeoxyuridine-mediated radiosensitization in human glioma: the effect of concentration, duration, and fluoropyrimidine modulation

Comparison of the bromodeoxyuridine-mediated sensitization effects between low-LET and high-LET ionizing radiation on DNA double-strand breaks

The incorporation of halogenated pyrmidines such as bromo- and iodo-deoxyuridines (BrdU, IdU) into DNA as thymidine analogs enhances cellular radiosensitivity when high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is not used. Although it is known that high-LET ionizing radiation confers fewer biological effects resulting from halogenated pyrimidine incorporation, the exact mechanisms of reduced radiosensitivity with high-LET radiation are not clear. We investigated the radiosensitization effects of halogenated pyrimidines with high-LET radiation using accelerated carbon and iron ions. Cells synchronized into the G1 phase after unifilar (1 cell cycle) and bifilar (2 cell cycles) substitution with 10 µM BrdU were exposed to various degrees of LET with heavy ions and X-rays. We then carried out a colony formation assay to measure cell survival. The γ-H2AX focus formation assay provided a measure of DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation and repair kinetics. Chromosomal aberration formations for the first post-irradiation metaphase were also scored. For both low-LET X-rays and carbon ions (13 keV/µm), BrdU incorporation led to impaired DNA repair kinetics, a larger initial number of DNA DSBs more frequent chromosomal aberrations at the first post-irradiated metaphase, and increased radiosensitivity for cell lethality. The enhancement ratio was higher after bifilar substitution. In contrast, no such synergistic enhancements were observed after high-LET irradiation with carbon and iron ions (70 and 200 keV/µm, respectively), even after bifilar substitution. Our results suggest that BrdU substitution did not modify the number and quality of DNA DSBs produced by high-LET radiation. The incorporation of halogenated pyrimidines may produce more complex/clustered DNA damage along with radicals formed by low-LET ionizing radiation. In contrast, the severity of damage produced by high-LET radiation may undermine the effects of BrdU and account for the observed minimal radiosensitization effects.

Single-strand-specific radiosensitization of DNA by bromodeoxyuridine

The effects of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) substitution for thymidine on gamma-ray-induced strand breakage were determined in single- and double-stranded oligonucleotides and double-stranded oligonucleotides containing a mismatched bubble region. BrdUrd does not sensitize complementary double-stranded DNA to gamma-ray-induced strand breakage, but it greatly sensitizes single-stranded DNA. However, when the BrdUrd is present in a single-stranded bubble of a double-stranded oligonucleotide, the non-base-paired nucleotides adjacent to the BrdUrd as well as several unpaired sites on the opposite unsubstituted strand are strongly sensitized. The radiosensitization properties of BrdUrd result primarily from the electrophilic nature of the bromine, making it a good leaving group and leading to the irreversible formation of the uridine-yl radical (dUrd(.)) or the uridine-yl anion (dUrd(-)) upon addition of an electron. The radiolytic loss of the bromine atom is greatly suppressed in double-stranded compared to single-stranded DNA. Thus we propose that the radiosensitization effects of bromouracil in vivo will likely be limited to single-strand regions such as found in transcription bubbles, replication forks, DNA bulges and the loop region of telomeres. Our results may have profound implications for the clinical use of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) as a radiosensitizer as well as for the development of targeted radiosensitizers.

IUdR polymers for combined continuous low-dose rate and high-dose rate sensitization of experimental human malignant gliomas

Local polymeric delivery enhances IUdR radiosensitization of human malignant gliomas (MG). The combined low-dose rate (LDR) (0.03 Gy/h) and fractionated high-dose rate (HDR) treatments result in cures of experimental MGs. To enhance efficacy, we combined polymeric IUdR delivery, LDR, and HDR for treatments of both subcutaneous and intracranial MGs. In vitro: Cells (U251 MG) were trypsinized and replated in triplicate 1 day prior to LDR irradiation in media either without (control) or with 10 microM IUdR. After 72 hr, LDR irradiation cells were acutely irradiated (1.1 Gy/min) with increasing (0, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, or 10 Gy) single doses. Implantable IUdR polymers [(poly(bis(p-carboxyphenoxy)-propane) (PCPP): sebaic acid (PCPP:SA), 20:80] (50% loading; 10 mg) were synthesized. In vivo: For flank vs. intracranial tumors, mice had 6 x 10(6) subcutaneous vs. 2 x 10(5) intracranial cells. For intracranial or subcutaneous MGs, mice had intratumoral blank (empty) vs. IUdR polymer treatments. One day after implantation, mice had immediate external LDR (3 cGy/h x 3 days total body irradiation) or HDR (2 Gy BID x 4 days to tumor site) or concurrent treatments. For the in vitro IUdR treatments, LDR resulted in a striking increase in cell-killing when combined with HDR. For the in vivo LDR treatments of flank tumors, the growth delay was greater for the IUdR vs. blank polymer treatments. For the combined LDR and HDR, the IUdR treatments resulted in a dramatic decrease in tumor volumes. On day 60 the log V/V0 were -1.7 +/- 0.22 for combined LDR + HDR + IUdR polymer (P < 0.05 vs. combined LDR + HDR + blank polymer). Survival for the intracranial controls was 22.9 +/- 1.2 days. For the blank polymer + LDR vs. blank polymer + LDR + HDR treatments, survival was 25.3 +/- 1.7 (P = NS) vs. 48.1 +/- 3.5 days (P < 0.05). For IUdR polymer + LDR treatment survival was 27.3 +/- 2.3 days (P = NS). The most striking improvement in survival followed the IUdR polymer + LDR + HDR treatment: 66.0 + 6.4 days (P < 0.05 vs. blank polymer + LDR + HDR). The polymeric IUdR delivery plus combined continuous LDR and HDR treatments results in growth delay and improved survival in animals bearing the MG xenografts. This treatment may hold promise for the treatment of human MGs.

Synthetic, implantable polymers for local delivery of IUdR to experimental human malignant glioma

PURPOSE

Recently, polymeric controlled delivery of chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival of patients with malignant glioma. We evaluated whether we could similarly deliver halogenated pyrimidines to experimental intracranial human malignant glioma. To address this issue we studied the in vitro release from polymers and the in vivo drug delivery of IUdR to experimental human U251 glioblastoma xenografts.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In vitro: To measure release, increasing (10%, 30%, 50%) proportions of IUdR in synthetic [(poly(bis(p-carboxyphenoxy)-propane) (PCPP):sebacic acid (SA) polymer discs were serially incubated in buffered saline and the supernatant fractions were assayed. In vivo: To compare local versus systemic delivery, mice bearing flank xenografts had intratumoral or contralateral flank IUdR polymer (50% loading) treatments. Mice bearing intracranial (i.c.) xenografts had i.c. versus flank IUdR polymer treatments. Four or 8 days after implantation of polymers, mice were sacrificed and the percentage tumor cells that were labeled with IUdR was measured using quantitative microscopic immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In vitro: Increasing percentage loadings of IUdR resulted in higher percentages of release: 43.7 + 0.1, 70.0 + 0.2, and 90.2 + 0.2 (p < 0.001 ANOVA) for the 10%, 30%, and 50% loadings, respectively. In vivo: For the flank tumors, both the ipsilateral and contralateral IUdR polymers resulted in similarly high percentages labeling of the tumors versus time. For the ipsilateral IUdR polymers, the percentage of tumor cellular labeling after 4 days versus 8 days was 45.8 +/- 7.0 versus 40.6 +/- 3.9 (p = NS). For the contralateral polymer implants, the percentage of tumor cellular labeling were 43.9 +/- 10.1 versus 35.9 +/- 5.2 (p = NS) measured 4 days versus 8 days after implantation. For the i.c. tumors treated with extracranial IUdR polymers, the percentage of tumor cellular labeling was low: 13.9 +/- 8.8 and 11.2 +/- 5.7 measured 4 and 8 days after implantation. For the i.c. tumors having the i.c. IUdR polymers, however, the percentage labeling was comparatively much higher: 34.3 +/- 4.9 and 35.3 +/- 4.0 on days 4 and 8, respectively. For the i.c. tumors, examination of the percentage cellular labeling versus distance from the implanted IUdR polymer showed that labeling was highest closest to the polymer disc.

CONCLUSION

Synthetic, implantable biodegradable polymers provide the local, controlled release of IUdR and result in the high, local delivery of IUdR to experimental intracranial human malignant glioma. This technique holds promise for the local delivery of IUdR for radiosensitization of human brain tumors.

Implantable biodegradable polymers for IUdR radiosensitization of experimental human malignant glioma

PURPOSE

The potential of halogenated pyrimidines for the radiosensitization of human malignant gliomas remains unrealized. To assess the role of local delivery for radiosensitization, we tested a synthetic, implantable biodegradable polymer for the controlled release of 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IUdR) both in vitro and in vivo and the resultant radiosensitization of human malignant glioma xenografts in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In vitro: To measure release, increasing (10%, 30%, 50%) proportions (weight/weight) of IUdR in the polyanhydride [(poly(bis(p-carboxyphenoxy)-propane) (PCPP): sebacic acid (SA) (PCPP : SA ratio 20:80)] polymer discs were incubated (1 ml phosphate-buffered saline, 37 degrees C). The supernatant fractions were serially assayed using high performance liquid chromatography. To measure modulation of release, polymer discs were co-loaded with 20 microCi 5-125-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (125-IUdR) and increasing (10%, 30%, or 50%) proportions of D-glucose. To test radiosensitization, cells (U251 human malignant glioma) were sequentially exposed to increasing (0 or 10 microM) concentrations of IUdR and increasing (0, 2.5, 5.0, or 10 Gy) doses of acute radiation. In vivo. To measure release, PCPP : SA polymer discs having 200 microCi 125-IUdR were surgically placed in U251 xenografts (0.1-0.2 cc) growing in the flanks of nude mice. The flanks were reproducibly positioned over a collimated scintillation detector and counted. To measure radiosensitization, PCPP : SA polymer discs having 0% (empty) or 50% IUdR were placed in the tumor or contralateral flank. After five days, the tumors were acutely irradiated (500 cGy x 2 daily fractions).

RESULTS

In vitro: Intact IUdR was released from the PCPP : SA polymer discs in proportion to the percentage loading. After 4 days the cumulative percentages of loaded IUdR that were released were 43.7 +/- 0.1, 70.0 +/- 0.2, and 90.2 +/- 0.2 (p < 0.001 ANOVA) for the 10, 30, and 50% loadings. With 0, 10, 30, or 50% D-glucose co-loading, the cumulative release of 125-IUdR from PCPP : SA polymers was 21, 70, 92, or 97% (p < 0.001), respectively, measured 26 days after incubation. IUdR radiosensitized U251 cells in vitro. Cell survival (log10) was -2.02 +/- 0.02 and -3.68 +/- 0.11 (p < 0.001) after the 10 Gy treatment and no (control) or 10 microM IUdR exposures, respectively. In vivo: 125-IUdR Release: The average counts (log10 cpm +/- SEM) (hours after implant) were 5.2 +/- 0.05 (0.5), 4.3 +/- 0.07 (17), 3.9 +/- 0.08 (64), and 2.8 +/- 0.06 (284). Radiosensitization: After intratumoral implantation of empty polymer or intratumoral 50% IUdR polymer, or implantation of 50% IUdR polymers contralateral to tumors the average growth delays of tumors to 4 times the initial volumes were 15.4 +/- 1.8, 20.1 + 0.1, and 20.3 + 3.6 (mean + SEM) days, respectively (p = 0.488 one-way ANOVA). After empty polymer and radiation treatments, no tumors regressed and the growth delay was 31.1 + 2.1 (p = 0.046 vs. empty polymer alone) days. After implantation of 50% IUdR polymers either contralateral to the tumors or inside the tumors, followed by radiation, tumors regressed; growth delays to return to the initial average volumes of 14.0 + 3.6 or 24.2 + 0.2 (p < 0.01) days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Synthetic, implantable biodegradable polymers hold promise for the controlled release and local delivery of IUdR for radiosensitization of gliomas.

Survival improvement in anaplastic astrocytoma, combining external radiation with halogenated pyrimidines: final report of RTOG 86-12, Phase I-II study

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the toxicity and tumor efficacy of the halopyrimidine IUdR as a chemical modifier of radiation response in patients with malignant glioma. The preliminary results published in 1993 demonstrated no real advantage in the group of patients with glioblastoma. However, a benefit appeared to be evolving in the group of patients with Anaplastic Astrocytoma (AA). We are now presenting the results on the long-term follow-up of patients with AA.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between August 1987 and October 1991, 79 patients were entered in a prospective study with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. Twenty-one of 79 were AA. The study was designed to have a fixed dose of radiation consisting of 60.16 Gy in 32 fractions in 6.5 weeks but varying the dose schedule of IUdR, delivered in a continuous intravenous infusion of long (96 h) or short (48 and 24 h) duration, every week for the 6.5 weeks of radiation treatment.

RESULTS

The last AA patient was entered in March 1991. Ninety-five percent of the AA patients were under 59 years of age and 86% had a Karnofsky score 80. Thirty-eight percent had a tumor diameter of less than 5 cm and 52% had a tumor diameter between 5-10 cm. Seventy-six percent had partial or total tumor resection. The toxicity of this treatment was acceptable and has already been published elsewhere. At the time of this report, 14 out of 21 patients with AA are dead. The median survival, calculated from the Kaplan-Meier, is 3.2 years. Thirty-three percent of the patients have survived 5 years. These results compare favorably with the best results reported in the literature with postoperative external radiation plus chemotherapy, median survival time (MST) of 3 years, and previous Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) experience with radiation alone, MST of 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings in patients with AA corroborate the improved therapeutic results published recently when combining external radiation with "long" infusion of i.v. BUdR and indicate the need to proceed with randomized Phase III studies utilizing halogenated pyrimidines and radiation. One such study has already been activated, RTOG # 94-04.