Ethanol-induced free radical injury to the hepatocyte glucagon receptor

Alcohol and liver cancer

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the eighth most frequent cancer in the world, accounting for approximately 500,000 deaths per year. Unlike many malignancies, hepatocellular carcinoma occurs predominantly within the context of known risk factors, with hepatic cirrhosis being the most common precursor to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. After ethanol ingestion, the liver represents the major site of metabolism. Ethanol metabolism by alcohol dehydrogenase leads to the generation of acetaldehyde and free radicals that bind rapidly to numerous cellular targets, including components of cell signaling pathways and DNA. In addition to direct DNA damage, acetaldehyde depletes glutathione, an antioxidant involved in detoxification. Chronic ethanol abuse leads to induction of hepatocyte microsomal cytochrome P450 2E1, an enzyme that metabolizes ethanol to acetaldehyde and, in doing so, causes further free radical production and aberrant cell function. Cytochrome P450 2E1-dependent ethanol metabolism is also associated with activation of procarcinogens, changes in cell cycle, nutritional deficiencies, and altered immune system responses. The identification of oxidative stress in mediating many deleterious effects of ethanol in the liver has led to renewed interest in the use of dietary antioxidants as therapeutic agents. Included in this group are S-adenosyl-L-methionine and plant-derived flavanoids.

Activation of the human aldehyde oxidase (hAOX1) promoter by tandem cooperative Sp1/Sp3 binding sites: identification of complex architecture in the hAOX upstream DNA that includes a proximal promoter, distal activation sites, and a silencer element

Aldehyde oxidase (AOX) is a member of the molybdenum iron-sulfur flavoproteins and is of interest for its role in clinical drug metabolism and as a source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) potentially involved in human pathology. The ROS derived from AOX contribute significantly to alcohol-induced hepatotoxicity. Therefore, expression of AOX could determine both the susceptibility of certain cells and tissues to clinically important pharmacologic agents and the levels of ROS produced under certain pathophysiological conditions. Although some pharmacologic agents regulate AOX enzyme activity, very little is known about the activation or regulation of the human AOX gene (hAOX). In the present study, we sought to identify features in the upstream DNA of hAOX that could confer regulation of the gene, to locate and characterize the basal promoter apparatus activating hAOX, and to identify transcription factors that could mediate activation or regulation. We transfected promoter fusion constructs into epithelial cells from the lung and the mammary gland that express AOX in cell culture. The hAOX gene was found to possess a structurally complex region in the upstream DNA that contained sequences for a proximal promoter, enhancer sites, and silencer elements. In addition, we identified an essential role for the transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3 in the proximal promoter. Unexpectedly, hAOX was activated in lung and mammary epithelial cells by indistinguishable mechanisms. These observations reveal a potentially complex mode of hAOX gene expression in epithelial cells that is dependent on Spl and Sp3 transcription factors.

Functional interactions between oxidative stress, membrane Na(+) permeability, and cell volume in rat hepatoma cells

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Oxidative stress leads to a rapid initial loss of liver cell volume, but the adaptive mechanisms that serve to restore volume have not been defined. This study aimed to evaluate the functional interactions between oxidative stress, cell volume recovery, and membrane ion permeability.

METHODS

In HTC rat hepatoma cells, oxidative stress was produced by exposure to H(2)O(2) or D-alanine plus D-amino acid oxidase (40 U/mL).

RESULTS

Oxidative stress resulted in a rapid decrease in relative cell volume to 0.85 +/- 0.06. This was followed by an approximately 100-fold increase in membrane cation permeability and partial volume recovery to 0.97 +/- 0.05 of original values. The volume-sensitive conductance was permeable to Na(+) approximately K(+) >> Tris(+), and whole-cell current density at -80 mV increased from -1.2 pA/pF at 10(-5) mol/L H(2)O(2) to -95.1 pA/pF at 10(-2) mol/L H(2)O(2). The effects of H(2)O(2) were completely inhibited by dialysis of the cell interior with reduced glutathione, and were markedly enhanced by inhibition of glutathione synthase.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the presence of dynamic functional interactions between cell volume, oxidative stress, and membrane Na(+) permeability. Stress-induced Na(+) influx may represent a beneficial adaptive response that partially restores cell volume over short periods, but sustained cation influx could contribute to the increase in intracellular [Na(+)] and [Ca(2+)] associated with cell injury and necrosis.

Alcohol-induced breast cancer: a proposed mechanism

Alcohol consumption increases the risk for breast cancer in women by still undefined means. Alcohol metabolism is known to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), and breast cancer is associated with high levels of hydroxyl radical (*OH) modified DNA, point mutations, single strand nicks, and chromosome rearrangement. Furthermore, ROS modification of DNA can produce the mutations and DNA damage found in breast cancer. Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) are expressed and regulated in breast tissues and aldehyde oxidase (AOX) may be present as well. Mammary gland XOR is an efficient source of ROS. Recently, hepatic XOR and AOX were found to generate ROS in two ways from alcohol metabolism: by acetaldehyde consumption and by the intrinsic NADH oxidase activity of both XOR and AOX. The data obtained suggests that: (1) expression of ADH and XOR or AOX in breast tissue provides the enzymes that generate ROS; (2) metabolism of alcohol produces acetaldehyde and NADH that can both be substrates for XOR or AOX and thereby result in ROS formation; and (3) ROS generated by XOR or AOX can induce the carcinogenic mutations and DNA damage found in breast cancer. Accumulation of iron coupled with diminished antioxidant defenses in breast tissue with advancing age provide additional support for this hypothesis because both result in elevated ROS damage that may exacerbate the risk for ROS-induced breast cancer.

Ethanol inhibits hepatocyte proliferation in insulin receptor substrate 1 transgenic mice

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Long-term ethanol consumption is known to impair the ability of the liver to regenerate, but the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Multiple growth factors promote hepatocyte proliferation, some of which involve the insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1)-mediated signal transduction pathway. To explore effects of ethanol on the IRS-1 signal liver growth in vivo, studies in transgenic mice overexpressing IRS-1 in the liver were performed because these mice show constitutive activation of the downstream signal transduction pathways leading to enhanced hepatocyte proliferation.

METHODS

Tyrosyl phosphorylation of IRS-1 and subsequent protein-protein interactions were examined in liver lysates from animals fed ethanol or control diet. Activity of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) was assessed by specific enzymatic assays. Hepatocyte proliferation was measured by incorporation of [3H]thymidine into liver DNA.

RESULTS

Tyrosyl phosphorylation of IRS-1, association of IRS-1 with PI3K, and activation of downstream PI3K and MAPK pathways were greatly reduced as a result of long-term ethanol consumption. Ethanol virtually abolished the enhanced hepatocyte DNA synthesis induced by expression of the IRS-1 transgene.

CONCLUSIONS

Altered transmission of growth signals through the IRS-1-mediated signal transduction cascade may represent a molecular mechanism of how ethanol inhibits hepatocyte proliferation.

Ethanol-induced cell death by lipid peroxidation in PC12 cells

Free radical generation is hypothesized to be the cause of alcohol-induced tissue injury. Using fluorescent cis-parinaric acid and TBARS, lipid peroxidation was shown to be increased in the presence of trace amounts of free ferrous ion in PC12 cells. This increase in lipid peroxidation was enhanced by ethanol in a dose dependent manner and also correlated with loss of cell viability, as measured by increased release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Resveratrol, a potent antioxidant, had a protective effect against lipid peroxidation and cell death. These findings strongly suggest that ethanol-induced tissue injury and cell death is a free radical mediated process, and may be important in alcohol-related premature aging and other degenerative diseases.

Ethanol-induced emesis in the house musk shrew, Suncus murinus

Ethanol-induced emesis were investigated using Suncus murinus and the emetogenic mechanisms of ethanol were compared with those of cisplatin. Intraperitoneal injection of ethanol caused dose-dependent emesis with ED50 value of 22.3% (v/v) when injection volume was adjusted to 4 ml/kg. Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous injection of acetaldehyde also caused dose-dependent emesis (ED50 = 3.5% (v/v) with an extremely shorter latency (6% i.p.: 1.0 +/- 0.3 min cf. 40% ethanol: 13.0 +/- 1.9 min). Neither ethanol nor acetaldehyde caused emetic responses when injected intracerebroventricularly. Pretreatment with disulfiram, an inhibitor of liver aldehyde dehydrogenase, potentiated the emetogenic effects of ethanol. Surgical abdominal vagotomy, which blocks cisplatin-induced emesis completely, did not prevent ethanol-induced emesis. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, which also cause complete inhibition of cisplatin-induced emesis, did not affect the responses. However, ethanol-induced emesis was prevented by the pretreatment with 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetrarin hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT) and N-(2-mercaptopropionyl)-glycine (MPG) dose-dependently. The tackykinin NK1 receptor antagonist (+)-(2S, 3S)-3-(2-methoxybenzylamino)-2-phenyl-piperidine (CP-99,994) also attenuated ethanol-induced emesis. Taken together, these results suggest that 1) acetaldehyde is probably responsible for ethanol-induced emesis, 2) active site for ethanol maybe peripheral, 3) ethanol-induced emesis is mediated by free radicals, and 4) mechanism of ethanol-induced emesis and that caused by cisplatin are different in many respects, although in some they are similar and that the precise pathways remain to be identified. Therefore, the tolerance to emetogenic effects of cisplatin in alcoholic patients cannot be explained as a simple cross desensitization of the pathway.