Clinical significance of serum S100 in metastatic malignant melanoma

Inflammatory landscape in Xeroderma pigmentosum patients with cutaneous melanoma

Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a DNA repair disease that predisposes to early skin cancers as cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma microenvironment contains inflammatory mediators, which would be interesting biomarkers for the prognosis or for the identification of novel therapeutic targets. We used a PCR array to evaluate the transcriptional pattern of 84 inflammatory genes in melanoma tumors obtained from XP patients (XP-Mel) and in sporadic melanoma (SP-Mel) compared to healthy skin. Commonly expressed inflammatory genes were further explored via GTEx and GEPIA databases. The differentially expressed inflammatory genes in XP were compared to their expression in skin exposed to UVs, and evaluated on the basis of the overall survival outcomes of patients with melanoma. Monocyte subsets of patients with SP-Mel, XP and healthy donors were also assessed. PCR array data revealed that 34 inflammatory genes were under-expressed in XP-Mel compared to SP-Mel. Differentially expressed genes that were common in XP-Mel and SP-Mel were correlated with the transcriptomic datasets from GEPIA and GTEx and highlighted the implication of KLK1 and IL8 in the tumorigenesis. We showed also that in XP-Mel tumors, there was an overexpression of KLK6 and KLK10 genes, which seems to be associated with a bad survival rate. As for the innate immunity, we observed a decrease of intermediate monocytes in patients with SP-Mel and in XP. We highlight an alteration in the immune response in XP patients. We identified candidate biomarkers involved in the tumorigenesis, and in the survival of patients with melanoma. Intermediate monocyte's in patients at risk could be a prognostic biomarker for melanoma outcome.

Optimal surveillance strategies for patients with stage 1 cutaneous melanoma post primary tumour excision: three systematic reviews and an economic model

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the UK, with rates continuing to rise, resulting in considerable burden to patients and the NHS.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of current and alternative follow-up strategies for stage IA and IB melanoma.

REVIEW METHODS

Three systematic reviews were conducted. (1) The effectiveness of surveillance strategies. Outcomes were detection of new primaries, recurrences, metastases and survival. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk-of-Bias 2.0 tool. (2) Prediction models to stratify by risk of recurrence, metastases and survival. Model performance was assessed by study-reported measures of discrimination (e.g. D-statistic, Harrel's c-statistic), calibration (e.g. the Hosmer-Lemeshow 'goodness-of-fit' test) or overall performance (e.g. Brier score, R ²). Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). (3) Diagnostic test accuracy of fine-needle biopsy and ultrasonography. Outcomes were detection of new primaries, recurrences, metastases and overall survival. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Review data and data from elsewhere were used to model the cost-effectiveness of alternative surveillance strategies and the value of further research.

RESULTS

(1) The surveillance review included one randomised controlled trial. There was no evidence of a difference in new primary or recurrence detected (risk ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 1.31). Risk of bias was considered to be of some concern. Certainty of the evidence was low. (2) Eleven risk prediction models were identified. Discrimination measures were reported for six models, with the area under the operating curve ranging from 0.59 to 0.88. Three models reported calibration measures, with coefficients of ≥ 0.88. Overall performance was reported by two models. In one, the Brier score was slightly better than the American Joint Committee on Cancer scheme score. The other reported an R ² of 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.49). All studies were judged to have a high risk of bias. (3) The diagnostic test accuracy review identified two studies. One study considered fine-needle biopsy and the other considered ultrasonography. The sensitivity and specificity for fine-needle biopsy were 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 0.97) and 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 0.97), respectively. For ultrasonography, sensitivity and specificity were 1.00 (95% confidence interval 0.03 to 1.00) and 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.96 to 0.99), respectively. For the reference standards and flow and timing domains, the risk of bias was rated as being high for both studies. The cost-effectiveness results suggest that, over a lifetime, less intensive surveillance than recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence might be worthwhile. There was considerable uncertainty. Improving the diagnostic performance of cancer nurse specialists and introducing a risk prediction tool could be promising. Further research on transition probabilities between different stages of melanoma and on improving diagnostic accuracy would be of most value.

LIMITATIONS

Overall, few data of limited quality were available, and these related to earlier versions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging. Consequently, there was considerable uncertainty in the economic evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite adoption of rigorous methods, too few data are available to justify changes to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations on surveillance. However, alternative strategies warrant further research, specifically on improving estimates of incidence, progression of recurrent disease; diagnostic accuracy and health-related quality of life; developing and evaluating risk stratification tools; and understanding patient preferences.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018086784.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol 25, No. 64. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

The utility of initial staging PET-CT as a baseline scan for surveillance imaging in stage II and III melanoma

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the utility of whole-body PET-CT for the initial staging and subsequent surveillance imaging of patients with completely resected stage II and stage III melanoma.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective review of patients who received perioperative whole-body PET-CT from January 1, 2005 to December 1, 2019 within three months of initial melanoma diagnosis was performed.

RESULTS

Of 258 total patients with completely resected melanoma who had a PET-CT within 3 months after their melanoma diagnosis, 113 had stage II and 145 had stage III melanoma. PET-CT detected distant metastasis in 3 (2.7%) of 113 stage II patients and 7 (4.8%) of 145 stage III patients. 179 of 258 patients had adequate follow-up time to determine whether they received surveillance cross-sectional imaging and whether they had a melanoma recurrence. 143 (79.9%) received subsequent surveillance imaging, 74 of whom developed a recurrence. In 64 (86.5%) of 74 cases, recurrence was detected by routine surveillance. 26 (34.2%) of 76 stage II and 65 (63.1%) of 103 stage III patients developed a recurrence. The median time to recurrence among the 179 patients for stage II and III was 16.3 and 13.0 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that baseline staging with whole-body PET-CT rarely provides information that changes initial management. Rather, the value of the initial PET-CT is as a baseline for subsequent surveillance scans. Therefore, it may be premature to discourage cross-sectional imaging for patients with stage II and III melanoma without supportive evidence or a reliable biomarker of recurrent disease.

Circulating MicroRNA Biomarkers in Melanoma: Tools and Challenges in Personalised Medicine

Effective management of melanoma depends heavily on early diagnosis. When detected in early non-metastatic stages, melanoma is almost 100% curable by surgical resection, however when detected in late metastatic stages III and IV, 5-year survival rates drop to ~50% and 10–25%, respectively, due to limited efficacy of current treatment options. This presents a pressing need to identify biomarkers that can detect patients at high risk of recurrence and progression to metastatic disease, which will allow for early intervention and survival benefit. Accumulating evidence over the past few decades has highlighted the potential use of circulating molecular biomarkers for melanoma diagnosis and prognosis, including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fragments. Since 2010, circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been increasingly recognised as more robust non-invasive biomarkers for melanoma due to their structural stability under the harsh conditions of the blood and different conditions of sample processing and isolation. Several pre-analytical and analytical variables challenge the accurate quantification of relative miRNA levels between serum samples or plasma samples, leading to conflicting findings between studies on circulating miRNA biomarkers for melanoma. In this review, we provide a critical summary of the circulating miRNA biomarkers for melanoma published to date.

Prognostic Value of Serum S-100B in Malignant Melanoma

Aims and Background

Although there is no established tumor marker of proven value for patients with melanoma, high serum levels of S-100B protein have been found in patients with melanoma and distant metastases. This study was performed to assess the prognostic value of this marker.

Methods and Study Design

Serum S-100B protein was measured by means of the LIA-mat System 300 (Sangtec S-100B LIA, AB Sangtec Medical, Bromma, Sweden) in 85 patients with melanoma.

Results

Mean serum S-100B protein was 0.075 μg/L (range, 0.001-0.470) in 66 patients with non-metastatic melanoma (stage I-III) versus 0.441 μg/L (range, 0.001-16.840) in 19 patients with metastatic melanoma (stage IV) (P <0.001, Mann Whitney U test). The median follow-up time was 329 days. Serum levels above 0.150 μg/L were found in 10 of patients with non-metastatic melanoma (15.2%) and in 17 of 19 patients with metastatic disease (89.4%). Median survival was 256 days for the 27 patients with serum S-100B levels above 0.150 μg/L versus 561 days for the 58 patients with normal values (P <0.3973).

Conclusion

Serum S-100B is a useful tumor marker in melanoma.

Fluorescent peptide biosensor for monitoring CDK4/cyclin D kinase activity in melanoma cell extracts, mouse xenografts and skin biopsies

Melanoma constitutes the most aggressive form of skin cancer, which further metastasizes into a deadly form of cancer. The p16(INK4a)-Cyclin D-CDK4/6-pRb pathway is dysregulated in 90% of melanomas. CDK4/Cyclin D kinase hyperactivation, associated with mutation of CDK4, amplification of Cyclin D or loss of p16(INK4a) leads to increased risk of developing melanoma. This kinase therefore constitutes a key biomarker in melanoma and an emerging pharmacological target, however there are no tools enabling direct detection or quantification of its activity. Here we report on the design and application of a fluorescent peptide biosensor to quantify CDK4 activity in melanoma cell extracts, skin biopsies and melanoma xenografts. This biosensor provides sensitive means of comparing CDK4 activity between different melanoma cell lines and further responds to CDK4 downregulation by siRNA or small-molecule inhibitors. By affording means of monitoring CDK4 hyperactivity consequent to cancer-associated molecular alterations in upstream signaling pathways that converge upon this kinase, this biosensor offers an alternative to immunological identification of melanoma-specific biomarkers, thereby constituting an attractive tool for diagnostic purposes, providing complementary functional information to histological analysis, of particular utility for detection of melanoma onset in precancerous lesions. This is indeed the first fluorescent peptide biosensor which has been successfully implemented to monitor kinase activity in skin samples and melanoma tumour xenografts. Moreover by enabling to monitor response to CDK4 inhibitors, this biosensor constitutes an attractive companion assay to identify compounds of therapeutic relevance for melanoma.

The Prognostic and Predictive Value of Melanoma-related MicroRNAs Using Tissue and Serum: A MicroRNA Expression Analysis

The overall 5-year survival for melanoma is 91%. However, if distant metastasis occurs (stage IV), cure rates are < 15%. Hence, melanoma detection in earlier stages (stages I–III) maximises the chances of patient survival. We measured the expression of a panel of 17 microRNAs (miRNAs) (MELmiR-17) in melanoma tissues (stage III; n = 76 and IV; n = 10) and serum samples (collected from controls with no melanoma, n = 130; and patients with melanoma (stages I/II, n = 86; III, n = 50; and IV, n = 119)) obtained from biobanks in Australia and Germany. In melanoma tissues, members of the ‘MELmiR-17’ panel were found to be predictors of stage, recurrence, and survival. Additionally, in a minimally-invasive blood test, a seven-miRNA panel (MELmiR-7) detected the presence of melanoma (relative to controls) with high sensitivity (93%) and specificity (≥ 82%) when ≥ 4 miRNAs were expressed. Moreover, the ‘MELmiR-7’ panel characterised overall survival of melanoma patients better than both serum LDH and S100B (delta log likelihood = 11, p < 0.001). This panel was found to be superior to currently used serological markers for melanoma progression, recurrence, and survival; and would be ideally suited to monitor tumour progression in patients diagnosed with early metastatic disease (stages IIIa–c/IV M1a–b) to detect relapse following surgical or adjuvant treatment.

•

A seven-miRNA panel (MELmiR-7) detected the presence of melanoma with high sensitivity (93%) and specificity (≥ 82%).

•

In serially collected stage IV specimens, members of the ‘MELmiR-7’ panel confirmed tumour progression in 100% of cases.

•

The ‘MELmiR-7’ panel is superior to currently used serological markers for melanoma progression, recurrence, and survival.

Use of S-100B to evaluate therapy effects during bevacizumab induction treatment in AJCC stage III melanoma

AIM

To investigate the feasibility of using bevacizumab to improve the survival of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III melanoma patients, we investigated how a single bevacizumab treatment affected nodal disease and a panel of biomarkers in clinically fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT)-staged, stage III melanoma patients, prior to therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND).

METHODS

Four weeks before TLND, nine patients (median age 50, range 28.8-62.1 years; two male, seven female) with palpable lymph node metastases received 7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab. Before and after this treatment, all patients were assessed by measurements of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) by FDG-PET scan, and serum S-100B and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). After TLND, the dissection specimen was analyzed for number of removed lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, and tumor necrosis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 15.5 (2.2-32.9) months. Histopathological analysis revealed tumor necrosis in six patients, of whom five had an S-100B decline and one had an unchanged S-100B level after bevacizumab. The other three patients showed an S-100B increase and no necrosis. Tumor necrosis was correlated with S-100B decrease (P = 0.048). No association was found between necrosis and the markers SUVmax and LDH. No wound healing disturbances were encountered.

CONCLUSION

Tumor necrosis in dissection specimens was associated with declining S-100B levels, while elevated S-100B was only found in cases with no necrosis. Bevacizumab might be useful in treating AJCC stage III melanoma patients prior to TLND, and S100-B appears to be a useful marker for assessment of treatment effects.

GNAS1 T393C polymorphism and disease progression in patients with malignant melanoma

Background

Once metastasized, despite a variety of therapeutic options, the prognosis of patients with malignant melanoma (MM) is still poor. Therefore, the search for reliable markers to identify patients with high risk of disease progression is of high clinical importance. We have recently shown that TT genotypes of the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) T393C in the gene GNAS1 are significantly associated with better outcome in a variety of carcinomas.

Patients

In the present study we assessed whether the T393C SNP is also related to the clinical course in MM. 328 patients with MM were retrospectively genotyped and genotypes were correlated with clinical outcome.

Results

While the allele frequency in the MM group (fC 0.52) did not significantly differ from that of healthy blood donors, the T393C SNP was associated with tumor progression of MM. Carriers of the C-allele showed a significantly more severe tumor progression as estimated from the time period to develop metastasis (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-3.2, p = 0.017). Proportions of 5-year metastasis-free intervals were 87.1% for TT genotypes and 66.0% for C-allele carriers. Moreover, multivariable Cox regression analysis including tumor stage and melanoma subtype proved the T393C polymorphism to be an independent factor for metastasis (p = 0.012).

Conclusions

In summary, the GNAS1 T393C SNP represents a genetic host factor for predicting tumor progression also in patients with MM; genotyping of this SNP may contribute to better define patients who could benefit from an early individualized therapy.

Biomarkers of metastatic melanoma

Melanoma, one of the most aggressive forms of human cancer, has undergone an alarming increase in incidence in recent years. Early detection is a prerequisite for proper diagnosis and therapy orientation. Soluble biomarkers are an important tool for early diagnosis. Markers that are associated with melanocyte functions imply the enzymes involved in melanin synthesis and the melanin-related metabolites. Proteins such as autocrine melanocyte cell growth factor and melanoma metastasis suppressor have gained attention in the biomarkers domain. The antimelanoma immune response elicited in patients can not only provide new biomarkers but important therapeutic approaches in specific treatments. All the molecules generated during the metastasis process, invasion of neighboring tissue, angiogenesis, invading lymphatic/blood vessels and establishing new tumors at a distant site, are targets for biomarker discovery.

S-100B concentrations predict disease-free survival in stage III melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Elevation of the tumor marker S-100B in melanoma patients is a highly specific indicator of recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The role of S-100B in disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated in stage III melanoma patients (staged with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography [FDG-PET] and computed tomography [CT]) with palpable lymph node metastases who underwent therapeutic lymph node dissection. S-100B and LDH were measured on the day before surgery (d = -1) and on days 1, 2, and 7 postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to study factors associated with preoperative elevation of S-100B. Univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate (Cox regression) survival analyses were performed to identify factors associated with DFS.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2008, 56 patients (median age 57, range 24-93) years, 27 males (48%) and 29 females (52%) entered the study. Preoperative S-100B elevation was found in 27 patients (48%) and elevated LDH in 20 patients (36%). No association was found between these two markers at any time. Multivariate analysis showed that elevated S-100B preoperatively (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, P = .03) was associated with DFS. S-100B elevation was associated with increased tumor size (odds ratio [OR] 3.40; P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Elevated S-100B preoperatively in patients with optimally staged clinical stage III melanoma is associated with decreased disease-free survival. S100-B could be used as a prognostic marker in the stratification of new adjuvant trials to select stage III melanoma patients for adjuvant systematic treatment.

Serologic and immunohistochemical prognostic biomarkers of cutaneous malignancies

Biomarkers are important tools in clinical diagnosis and prognostic classification of various cutaneous malignancies. Besides clinical and histopathological aspects (e.g. anatomic site and type of the primary tumour, tumour size and invasion depth, ulceration, vascular invasion), an increasing variety of molecular markers have been identified, providing the possibility of a more detailed diagnostic and prognostic subgrouping of tumour entities, up to even changing existing classification systems. Recently published gene expression or proteomic profiling data relate to new marker molecules involved in skin cancer pathogenesis, which may, after validation by suitable studies, represent future prognostic or predictive biomarkers in cutaneous malignancies. We, here, give an overview on currently known serologic and newer immunohistochemical biomarker molecules in the most common cutaneous malignancies, malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma and cutaneous lymphoma, particularly emphasizing their prognostic and predictive significance.

Molecular diagnostics in melanoma

Molecular pathology is rapidly evolving, featuring continuous technologic improvements that offer novel clinical opportunities for the recognition of disease predisposition, for identifying sub-clinical disease, for more accurate diagnosis, for selecting efficacious and non-toxic therapy, and for monitoring of disease outcome. Currently, the identification and prognosis of primary cutaneous melanoma is based on histologic factors (tumor depth and ulceration) and clinical factors (number of lymph node and/or distant metastases). However, metastasis can occur in patients with thin melanomas, and sentinel lymph node biopsy does not identify all patients at risk for distant metastasis. New markers exist that correlate with melanoma progression, which may aid in melanoma identification, prognostication, and detection of minimal residual disease/early recurrence. Moreover, not many therapeutic options exist for melanoma as no regimen prolongs survival. Emerging data with investigational therapies suggest that certain markers might play a crucial role in identifying patients who will respond to therapy or show utility in the monitoring the response to therapy. Herein, molecular diagnostics that can potentially benefit the individual melanoma patient will be discussed.

Tumor type M2 pyruvate kinase (TuM2-PK) as a novel plasma tumor marker in melanoma

Proliferating cells express the pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2 (M2-PK). This enzyme exists as an active tetramer and an inactive dimer. The dimeric form is predominantly found in tumor cells and is therefore termed Tumor M2-PK (TuM2-PK). TuM2-PK molecules are released into the peripheral blood and may hereby function as a marker of tumor load in cancer patients. Our study was aimed to investigate TuM2-PK as a potential plasma marker in melanoma patients compared to the well-established serum marker S100beta. We measured the concentration of TuM2-PK in plasma and S100beta in corresponding serum samples from 300 melanoma patients and 53 healthy controls using a sandwich ELISA and an immunoluminometric assay, respectively. Plasma concentrations of TuM2-PK were significantly increased in melanoma patients compared to healthy controls (9.30 U/ml vs. 7.20 U/ml; p = 0.0036) and correlated with tumor load (p < 0.0005) and disease stage (p < 0.0005). Patients with elevated plasma TuM2-PK (cut-off = 15 U/ml) presented a reduced overall (p < 0.000005) and progression-free (p = 0.023) survival. Multivariate analysis revealed plasma TuM2-PK and serum S100beta as independent predictors of overall survival in metastasized patients. Neither plasma TuM2-PK nor serum S100beta showed prognostic relevance for tumor-free patients. Although the sensitivity and specificity to predict disease progression or death was higher for serum S100beta compared to plasma TuM2-PK, the combination of both markers improved the estimation of prognosis compared to that of serum S100beta alone.

Serum Protein S-100 Predicts Clinical Outcome in Patients with Melanoma Treated with Adjuvant Interferon – Comparison with Tyrosinase RT-PCR

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical value of the determination of serum S-100 protein as a single tumor marker or in combination with tyrosinase RT-PCR in patients with melanoma receiving adjuvant interferon.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were tested for serum S-100 protein luminoimmunometric assay and for blood tyrosinase mRNA (RT-PCR), before starting interferon and every 2-3 months thereafter.

RESULTS

One hundred and six patients (stage IIA, 27; IIB, 19; III, 49; and IV, 11) were included in the study. Median follow-up was 51 months (range 2-76). In the univariate analysis, under treatment S-100 > or =0.15 microg/l and a positive RT-PCR correlated with a lower disease-free survival and overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis, clinical stage, under therapy positive RT-PCR and S-100 levels > or =0.15 mug/ml, were independent prognostic factors for OS. The hazard ratio for OS was 3.9 (95% CI, 1.67-9.15; p = 0.004) and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.05-4.6; p = 0.016) for S-100 > or =0.15 microg/l and positive RT-PCR, respectively. When both techniques where combined, a positive RT-PCR indicated a poorer clinical outcome only in patients with S-100 <0.15 microg/l.

CONCLUSIONS

S-100 > or =0.15 microg/l and a positive RT-PCR during adjuvant interferon therapy indicate a high risk of death in resected melanoma patients. S-100 determination has a higher positive predictive value than RT-PCR, while tyrosinase RT-PCR adds prognostic information in patients with S-100 <0.15 microg/l.

Multicenter evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of the Elecsys S100 immunoassay in patients with malignant melanoma

The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the technical and clinical performance of the Elecsys S100 electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and to assess its utility as a tumor marker in patients with malignant melanoma. Imprecision studies yielded within-run coefficients of variation (CVs) of 0.7-2.0% and between-day CVs of 1.0-6.4%. Serum samples that were distributed to 11 participating laboratories for a comparability analysis resulted in excellent recoveries of 93-105% related to the median for all laboratories. The functional sensitivity of the assay was determined to be below 0.02 microg/L. The lot-to-lot reproducibility of Elecsys S100 was tested by analyzing 110 sera with three different reagent lots on an E2010 analyzer. This lot-to-lot comparison showed excellent correlation, with a coefficient of 0.99. A 95th percentile cut-off value of 0.10 microg/L was calculated from values measured in 206 healthy individuals. Using this cut-off value, sensitivity of 41% was found, with positive and negative predictive values of 0.50 and 0.91, respectively. Method comparison with the Sangtec 100 luminescence immunoassay, run on two different analyzers, showed correlation with coefficients ranging from 0.76 to 0.95. A comparison of S100 values obtained with both tests showed identical patterns in 68 serial samples from 15 patients with malignant melanoma during follow-up. These findings indicate that serial measurements with the Elecsys S100 assay are useful for the follow-up and monitoring of therapy in patients with malignant melanoma.

Serummarker des malignen Melanoms

Tumor markers in the serum of cancer patients have an important role in clinical diagnosis and in prognosis, and also in the monitoring of the patients' disease and response to therapy over time. The serum markers currently available for melanoma have only limited clinical use. Those most widely used in clinical applications are S100-beta, melanoma inhibitory activity, and lactate dehydrogenase; there are close correlations between the serum concentrations of these and tumor load. Regular determination of S100-beta and MIA levels during follow-up can therefore be used for early detection of a tumor relapse in melanoma patients, increased serum concentrations of these marker proteins being indicative of tumor growth. Patients with distant metastases from melanoma who present with elevated serum levels of S100-beta, MIA, or LDH have poorer overall survival than do patients whose serum concentrations are within normal ranges. These three markers can also be used to monitor the course of disease and therapy outcome in patients with distant metastases. Since there are no marker proteins for melanoma that are not dependent on tumor load, it is not currently possible to forecast the survival of patients who are tumor free after surgery. Serum markers are also not suitable for screening or for the diagnosis of primary melanomas.

Search for melanoma markers in plasma and serum samples

Fourteen blood samples from patients with melanoma and eleven blood samples from healthy subjects were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry. The study was focussed on species of low molecular weight, in the range 800-5000 Da, present in plasma and sera. While for healthy subjects plasma samples lead to the production of a higher number of ionic species, for melanoma patients a high number of diagnostic ions, present with high frequency and with quite high relative abundance, are present in particular in serum samples and to a lesser extent also in plasma. Since plasma samples are obtained more easily in comparison to sera, it is possible to suggest that also plasma can be used for these studies.

Clinical value of protein S100 and melanoma-inhibitory activity (MIA) in malignant melanoma

Serum protein S100 and melanoma-inhibitory protein (MIA) have been described as useful tumor markers for malignant melanoma. In this study, these two serum proteins were compared in 48 patients with melanoma at different stages of disease. Serum concentrations of S100 and MIA were measured by immunoradiometric and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, respectively. We found that the cut-off values were 17.4 ng/ml for MIA and 0.09 microg/l for S100. Five patients had stage I-II, 22 had stage III, and 21 had stage IV disease. Serum levels of two markers were elevated with metastatic disease (p < 0.05). Sensitivities of the MIA were found higher compared with S100 in patients with extensive (M1c) metastatic disease and with chemotherapy nonresponders (p > 0.05). We showed a trend for worsened outcome in patients with elevated MIA level in univariate analysis. MIA was found to be more sensitive and is a potential prognostic marker for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma in comparison with S100.

Biomarkers in melanoma: staging, prognosis and detection of early metastases

Currently, melanoma remains a surgical disease since early detection and excision of thin melanomas offers the best chance of a cure. Despite intensive clinical investigation, no effective systemic therapies exist for metastatic melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has greatly aided the staging and prognostic evaluation of primary cutaneous melanoma, however, approximately a third of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanomas present without prior regional lymph node involvement. Additional prognostic biomarkers exist which help determine the risk of advanced melanoma but the accuracy for each current marker is less than 100%. A greater understanding of the biology of melanomas and the development of new methods to identify patients with early (subclinical) metastatic disease may allow for selective and more effective therapy for patients at-risk for advanced disease. In this paper, current and novel potentially more accurate biomarkers for the staging and prognostic evaluation of melanoma patients, and for the detection of subclinical metastases are reviewed.

Serum S100B is suitable for prediction and monitoring of response to chemoimmunotherapy in metastatic malignant melanoma

Serum S100B and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were evaluated for their ability to predict response in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma and to determine their usefulness in monitoring the results of chemoimmunotherapy. Levels were studied in 53 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma receiving chemoimmunotherapy and in 19 control patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving a similar immunotherapy regimen. The serum S100B level was elevated in 81% of the patients before treatment. Marker levels were significantly higher in patients who did not respond (n = 22). Patients with S100B levels >or= 1.0 microg/l were less likely to obtain remission or stable disease than the group with normal or moderately elevated serum concentrations (P < 0.01). After treatment, 17 of the 31 (55%) patients with stable or responsive disease had a S100B serum level below the cut-off point versus only one of the 22 (5%) patients in the group with progressive disease. For LDH the proportions of patients were 17 out of 31 (55%) and nine out of 22 (41%), respectively. In 15 melanoma patients there was a transient rise in the level of serum S100B at the beginning of systemic therapy. All 19 patients in the control group had an initial serum S100B level <or= 0.16 microg/l, but nine showed a transient rise during immunotherapy. In conclusion, S100B levels are of value for predicting the response to and for monitoring patients during chemoimmunotherapy.

Clinical evaluation of 5-S-cysteinyldopa testing using a new and optimized detection system as a tumour marker for malignant melanoma

5-S-cysteinyldopa (5-S-CD) has been described as a tumour marker for the detection of human metastatic melanoma. We investigated the clinical utility of a new and optimized method to detect 5-S-CD by analysing 207 plasma samples derived from 138 patients with clinical stage I/II ( = 60), III ( = 32) or IV ( = 46) melanoma. Control groups consisted of 27 patients with non-melanoma skin diseases and 30 healthy volunteers. 5-S-CD plasma levels were determined using a new analytical technique based on a fully automated solid phase extraction coupled online to a novel high performance liquid chromatography method. In all the samples from the healthy control subjects 5-S-CD plasma concentrations were below 2.0 microg/l. Increased 5-S-CD-levels (>/=2.0 microg/l) were found in 52%, 67% and 81% of the plasma samples from patients with stages I/II, III and IV malignant melanoma, respectively. The mean values of 5-S-CD were found to rise with increasing tumour stage. Among 27 samples from patients with non-melanoma skin disease, slightly elevated 5-S-CD levels between 2.3 and 2.6 microg/l were found in only four samples from patients with multiple dysplastic naevi. In conclusion, our improved analytical technique provides a high sensitivity in all stages of the disease and represents a useful technique for monitoring melanoma patients.

Soluble HLA-DR is a potent predictive indicator of disease progression in serum from early-stage melanoma patients

Despite numerous therapeutic options, the prognosis of malignant melanoma, once metastasized, is still poor. Thus, the search for reliable methods to identify patients with high risk of disease progression as early as possible is of major importance. In our study, we analyzed the predictive value of soluble HLA-DR (sHLA-DR) in comparison to S100-beta in serum from 183 melanoma patients of different stages of disease and with or without current therapy using immunosorbent assays. sHLA-DR serum levels of 121 healthy individuals served as controls. We found significantly (p < 0.0005) reduced sHLA-DR serum levels in melanoma patients (0.70 +/- 0.08 SEM microg/ml) compared to controls (1.49 +/- 0.10 SEM microg/ml). Reduced sHLA-DR and increased S100-beta levels were associated with advanced disease stages and tumor load. S100-beta was increased under cytostatic therapy (p < 0.0005), whereas sHLA-DR was not influenced by therapy modalities. Univariate analysis showed an association of sHLA-DR < 0.3 microg/ml and S100-beta > 0.12 microg/l with poor overall (p = 0.021 and p = 0.0009) and progression-free survival (p < 0.0005 and p = 0.0025). Multivariate analysis revealed disease stage (p = 0.0093) and tumor burden (p < 0.0005) as independent predictive factors for overall survival, and sHLA-DR (p = 0.0007) and tumor burden (p = 0.0015) for progression-free survival. In contrast to S100-beta, sHLA-DR serum concentrations < 0.3 microg/ml were strongly associated (p = 0.0001) with poor progression-free survival in a subgroup of 60 nonmetastasized patients. In conclusion, our results suggest sHLA-DR as a potent prognostic serum marker in melanoma patients superior to S100-beta in helping to identify early-stage patients at high risk of disease progression.

Serum S100 concentrations are not useful in predicting micrometastatic disease in cutaneous malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND

S100 protein is an acidic calcium binding protein that is expressed by melanoma cells. Elevated serum values of S100 have been described in metastatic disease and it has been suggested that it may be used as an adjunct to staging and monitoring of treatment. Micrometastatic disease in the sentinel lymph node can be demonstrated by sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and the sentinel node status is known to be the most important predictor of relapse.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether serum S100 concentrations could predict the presence of micrometastatic disease.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with primary cutaneous melanoma > 1 mm were recruited from referrals to the Melanoma clinic. All patients had serum S100 concentrations evaluated prior to undergoing SNB. Serum S100 concentrations were established using an immunoluminometric method. Sentinel nodes were identified using a dual technique with both radiolabelled colloid (residual from preoperative lymphoscintigraphy) and blue dye according to the MD Anderson Cancer Center protocol. Results Nine of these 31 patients had evidence of micrometastatic disease on SNB. The mean serum S100 concentration of those with positive SNBs was 0.027 microg L-1 compared with 0.045 microg x L(-1) in patients with negative SNBs (normal < 0.14 microg x L(-1)). No patient in the study demonstrated raised concentrations of serum S100.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that serum S100 concentrations do not predict the presence of micrometastatic melanoma in sentinel nodes in primary cutaneous melanoma.

Are responses to therapy of metastasized malignant melanoma reflected by decreasing serum values of S100beta or melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA)?

In metastatic melanoma S100beta as well as melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA) are elevated in the serum in the majority of patients. Elevation has been found to correlate with shorter survival, and changes in these parameters in the serum during therapy were recently reported to predict therapeutic outcome in advanced disease. However, the value of these markers with respect to other possible markers by multivariate analysis has not yet been proven for individual patients. In this prospective study, S100beta and MIA were measured in the serum of 67 consecutive patients before and following treatment. Analysing both the sensitivity and the specificity of the serum parameters by the areas under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, decreases in S100beta and MIA during therapy were associated with response to therapy, while increases indicated progressive disease. Unexpectedly, the individual diagnostic value of changes in tumour markers during therapy was not superior to one-point measurements at restaging. Moreover, S100beta and MIA were not superior to the conventional parameters lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein (CRP) on multiple logistic regression analysis. Applying classification and regression trees (CARTs), one-point measurements of CRP was shown to be the most relevant overall parameter.

Quantification of melanoma-associated molecules in plasma/serum of melanoma patients

Tumor markers for metastatic melanoma have, so far, been infrequently used. Although there is good evidence from several studies that protein S-100B serum measurement could serve as a valid marker for micro- and/or macrometastasis, the S-100B-LIAmat test has not been established as part of national and international recommendations for the care of melanoma patients. Future studies should focus on early detection of metastatic disease with S-100B compared to routine clinical, laboratory and technical evaluations. Furthermore, preliminary, interesting results on the predictive value of S-100B for the monitoring of metastatic patients during treatment should be verified in multicenter trials. The same considerations are true for melanoma-inhibitory activity (MIA), a new and interesting tool for the detection of metastatic melanoma. However, available data on the clinical use of on the MIA-ELISA are too limited to speculate on an even higher sensitivity and specificity than reported for S-100B. Melanin metabolites are candidates for valid melanoma markers, too. Quantification of 5-S-cysteinyldopa from blood or urine of melanoma patients has not been transferred from the laboratory to daily routine due to several technical problems in the assessment of this particular molecule. Cytokines, adhesion molecules and metalloproteinases are shed from melanoma cells into the serum, but these cells are not the only source of elevated serum levels. Several inflammatory conditions are responsible for high serum concentrations of these molecules. In general, they are not sensitive and specific enough to serve as "melanoma markers."

Serological markers for melanoma

We present a review of current literature concerning the significance of serological markers in melanoma patients. Results for cytokines, cytokine receptors, cell adhesion molecules, S100 protein, melanoma inhibitory activity, tissue-specific reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, neurone-specific enolase, lipid-bound sialic acid and melanin metabolites such as 5-S-cysteinyldopa and 6-hydroxy-5-methoxyindole-2-carboxylic acid are discussed. For most of these substances, serum levels are more pronounced in the more advanced stages of disease. Therefore, these markers seem to have no place in the early detection of melanoma. On the other hand, sensitivity in the advanced stages of disease seems to be < 100%, compromising their use as a new staging procedure. Some markers show promising results as a possible prognostic factor in the early detection of disease progression or in the prediction of therapy outcome. If confirmed by further studies, this could direct future therapeutic strategies and could help to select patients who would benefit most from more aggressive (adjuvant) therapies. In addition, the study of some of these substances could add to the knowledge of tumour biology and immunology.

Protein profiles in sera of patients with malignant cutaneous melanoma

Seventeen samples of sera from patients with malignant cutaneous melanoma at various stages and 14 samples from healthy subjects were analysed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry. Results highlighted the presence of several protein species at molecular weights lower than 30000 Da, presumably originating from proteolysis, in the sera of the patients with melanoma. These species were completely absent in healthy subjects. In particular, the presence and abundance of species with molecular weights in the range 2500-3500 Da exhibit significant variations related to the different clinical stages of the disease.

S-100 protein in peripheral blood: a marker for melanoma metastases: a prospective 2-center study of 570 patients with melanoma

BACKGROUND

S-100 protein, commonly used in the immunohistochemical diagnosis of malignant melanoma and melanoma metastases, has recently been introduced as a tumor marker in peripheral blood.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective, observational, 2-center study evaluates S-100 in peripheral blood of patients with melanoma as a marker for metastasis.

METHODS

With application of an immunoluminometric assay, S-100 levels in 1396 samples of 570 patients with melanoma and 53 control subjects were measured in a blinded manner.

RESULTS

The cut-off level for patients with melanoma without medical history of metastases versus patients with newly occurring lymph node, visceral, and/or brain metastases was 0.114 microg/L, with a sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval, 86.4%-98.5%) and a specificity of 91% (95% confidence interval, 87.7%-93.6%). False-negative results included patients with unknown primary melanoma and those with amelanotic melanoma metastases.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that S-100 in the peripheral blood of patients with melanoma could serve as a marker indicating new melanoma metastases and could help to monitor the course of the disease.

S100-Beta, melanoma-inhibiting activity, and lactate dehydrogenase discriminate progressive from nonprogressive American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV melanoma

PURPOSE

Monitoring advanced malignant melanoma, serum levels of S100-beta (S100beta) and melanoma-inhibiting activity (MIA) were assessed for the ability to discriminate progressive from nonprogressive disease. S100beta and MIA were supposed to be superior to conventional variables, such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients with stage IV malignant melanoma according to the criteria of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) were included in the study. Results of restaging examinations were used as an independent reference standard for diagnosing progressive disease, and S100beta, MIA, LDH level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were determined in venous blood just before restaging. Sensitivities and specificities of the parameters were calculated by logistic regression analysis. Discrimination ability was assessed by Somers' D(xy) rank correlation and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC).

RESULTS

All tested serum parameters were significantly elevated in patients with progressive disease. The highest sensitivities according to the established thresholds were found for S100beta and MIA (91% and 88%, respectively). LDH had the highest specificity (92%). ESR was dropped from the analysis because of low specificity. In calculating Somers' D(xy) and ROC-AUC values, S100beta, MIA, and LDH showed high discrimination ability. By multiple logistic regression, LDH was identified to be the only statistically significant marker for progressive disease. S100beta and MIA did not provide additional significant information because of their high correlation with LDH with respect to clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Elevated serum levels of S100beta, MIA, and LDH indicate current disease progression in AJCC stage IV melanoma. LDH was the most relevant overall parameter.

Predictive value of serum S100B for monitoring patients with metastatic melanoma during chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy

In the immunohistology of malignant melanoma the use of polyclonal antibodies against protein S100 is well established. Recently, it was shown that S100B, a subunit of the S100 protein family, is detectable in the serum of melanoma patients and correlates with the stage of the disease in patients with metastatic melanoma. In the present study, the first evaluation of a large number of treatment observations (n = 77) in 64 different patients during chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy for advanced metastatic melanoma (stage IV) is presented. All patients received treatment according to standardized protocols comprising 8 weeks of treatment followed by routine staging procedures to evaluate therapeutic outcome. In 13 patients with tumour enlargement after first-line therapy, a second-line treatment was subsequently given. S100B immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) tests were performed before, during and after treatment at scheduled time points. In the interim analysis at 4 weeks 29 of 37 (78%) patients with tumour progression during treatment showed a raised S100B level. In the final analysis at 8 weeks, 31 of these 37 patients (84%) demonstrated rising S100B values (P < 0.001). Patients who responded to treatment (stable or regressing metastatic disease) showed constant or declining S100B levels in 38 of 40 patients (95%) at the interim analysis, at 8 weeks this was further increased to 39 of 40 patients (98%; P < 0.001). Thus, the use of S100B for monitoring treatment is adequate in the majority of cases. Our observations are of great interest for therapeutic trials of adjuvant and palliative therapies as the rise of S100B levels might indicate that re-staging and/or changes in therapy strategies should be chosen.

[Managing cutaneous melanoma]

Cutaneous melanoma represents the main cause of death among skin cancers. Early diagnosis gives, for the time being, the only possibility for high rate of curative treatment. Diagnosis is based on pathological findings, and at primary tumor stage. Breslow thickness of the lesion is the best prognostic index. At local stage of the disease, treatment is precisely codified by international recommendations and consensus conferences. Follow-up after surgical treatment is also well codified. Treatment of lymph node invasion or metastatic disease is, on the other hand, less codified. Despite recent advances, especially in immunotherapy, treatment of advanced stages of melanoma remains difficult.

Laboratory tests and imaging studies in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma

Laboratory tests and imaging studies are often ordered for asymptomatic patients with malignant melanomas (MMs) in an effort to detect subclinical metastatic disease. However, their sensitivity and specificity for detecting cryptic metastases are not well established. A review of the literature on laboratory tests and imaging studies for MM metastases was undertaken to address the usefulness of such investigations in asymptomatic patients with MM in AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer system of classification) stages I, II, and III. A review of the pertinent literature since 1966 was conducted through MEDLINE, Medica, and Cancerlit. Laboratory tests and imaging studies revealed occult MM metastases in only a small number of the thousands of reported patients with putative AJCC stage I, II, and III MM. However, for those diagnosed with limited metastases, surgical removal with or without immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy can lead to long-term remissions in some patients. For patients with asymptomatic AJCC stage I or II disease, chest roentgenograms (CXR) and blood lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels may be obtained at low cost and prove to be of benefit if metastases are identified. For patients with AJCC stage III disease, computed tomographic (CT) scans of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis (especially when the primary cutaneous site of the melanoma is below the waist) may be considered for detecting metastatic MM. Other tests, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain, may be ordered based on symptoms or physical findings. In the future, technologically improved techniques and newer methods may prove cost-effective for detecting treatable asymptomatic MM metastases. Furthermore, improvement in treatments will also influence the indications for the search for occult MM metastases. At this time there is a need for an international consensus conference on laboratory tests and imaging studies for occult melanoma metastases.

S-100 and NSE as serum markers in melanoma

S-100 protein and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) have recently been proposed as serum markers for melanoma. In this study NSE and S-100 serum levels were assayed by commercial IRMA methods in 53 patients with melanoma. The overall prevalence of abnormal marker levels was similar for NSE (26%) and S-100 (30%). The 24 patients in stages I and II had uniformly normal S-100 levels, but abnormal NSE levels were observed in 3 out of the 12 patients in stage II (33%) and in 1 out of 12 in stage I. NSE appears thus to be the marker of choice in the early stages, where its increase points to disease progression. In patients in stages III and IV the prevalence of abnormal values was 34% for NSE and 55% for S-100 (p = < 0.05). In the latter group diagnostic sensitivity increased to 62% if isolated elevation of each marker was considered. In patients with advanced stage disease, both NSE and S-100 should be assayed.

Laboratory tests and imaging studies in patients with cutaneous malignant melanomas: a survey of experienced physicians

BACKGROUND

The presence or absence of metastases is important in determining prognosis and treatment options for patients with malignant melanoma (MM). Laboratory tests and imaging studies are ordered for patients with MMs but without symptoms in an effort to detect occult metastases. However, which laboratory tests and imaging studies to order and how often to reorder them is not well established.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine which tests and studies are ordered by physicians with major responsibilities for the care of patients with MM.

METHODS

Physicians were surveyed by questionnaire about the laboratory tests and imaging studies they ordered for MM stages 0, I, II, and III.

RESULTS

Of the 35 physicians queried, 30 (86%) responded to the survey. The majority of physicians order tests as follows: no tests for MM in situ; roentgenography of the chest with or without initial lactic acid dehydrogenase/liver function tests for stages I, II, and III and during follow-up for stages IB, II, and III (more frequently as the Breslow thickness increases); and baseline computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging scans of the chest, abdomen/pelvis, and brain for stage III.

CONCLUSION

Although the pattern of ordering examinations was similar for the majority of respondents, there was significant variability among experienced physicians in ordering laboratory tests and imaging studies in the search for occult metastases in patients with asymptomatic MM. The laboratory tests and imaging studies ordered and their frequency depend on the stage of the MM and sometimes on other risk factors.