The leucine-responsive regulatory protein: more than a regulator?

Ready or Not: Microbial Adaptive Responses in Dynamic Symbiosis Environments

In mutually beneficial and pathogenic symbiotic associations, microbes must adapt to the host environment for optimal fitness. Both within an individual host and during transmission between hosts, microbes are exposed to temporal and spatial variation in environmental conditions. The phenomenon of phenotypic variation, in which different subpopulations of cells express distinctive and potentially adaptive characteristics, can contribute to microbial adaptation to a lifestyle that includes rapidly changing environments. The environments experienced by a symbiotic microbe during its life history can be erratic or predictable, and each can impact the evolution of adaptive responses. In particular, the predictability of a rhythmic or cyclical series of environments may promote the evolution of signal transduction cascades that allow preadaptive responses to environments that are likely to be encountered in the future, a phenomenon known as adaptive prediction. In this review, we summarize environmental variations known to occur in some well-studied models of symbiosis and how these may contribute to the evolution of microbial population heterogeneity and anticipatory behavior. We provide details about the symbiosis between Xenorhabdus bacteria and Steinernema nematodes as a model to investigate the concept of environmental adaptation and adaptive prediction in a microbial symbiosis.

Nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli: putting molecular data into a systems perspective

We present a comprehensive overview of the hierarchical network of intracellular processes revolving around central nitrogen metabolism in Escherichia coli. The hierarchy intertwines transport, metabolism, signaling leading to posttranslational modification, and transcription. The protein components of the network include an ammonium transporter (AmtB), a glutamine transporter (GlnHPQ), two ammonium assimilation pathways (glutamine synthetase [GS]-glutamate synthase [glutamine 2-oxoglutarate amidotransferase {GOGAT}] and glutamate dehydrogenase [GDH]), the two bifunctional enzymes adenylyl transferase/adenylyl-removing enzyme (ATase) and uridylyl transferase/uridylyl-removing enzyme (UTase), the two trimeric signal transduction proteins (GlnB and GlnK), the two-component regulatory system composed of the histidine protein kinase nitrogen regulator II (NRII) and the response nitrogen regulator I (NRI), three global transcriptional regulators called nitrogen assimilation control (Nac) protein, leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), and cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (Crp), the glutaminases, and the nitrogen-phosphotransferase system. First, the structural and molecular knowledge on these proteins is reviewed. Thereafter, the activities of the components as they engage together in transport, metabolism, signal transduction, and transcription and their regulation are discussed. Next, old and new molecular data and physiological data are put into a common perspective on integral cellular functioning, especially with the aim of resolving counterintuitive or paradoxical processes featured in nitrogen assimilation. Finally, we articulate what still remains to be discovered and what general lessons can be learned from the vast amounts of data that are available now.

Recognition of DNA by the helix-turn-helix global regulatory protein Lrp is modulated by the amino terminus

The AsnC/Lrp family of regulatory proteins links bacterial and archaeal transcription patterns to metabolism. In Escherichia coli, Lrp regulates approximately 400 genes, over 200 of them directly. In earlier studies, lrp genes from Vibrio cholerae, Proteus mirabilis, and E. coli were introduced into the same E. coli background and yielded overlapping but significantly different regulons. These differences were seen despite amino acid sequence identities of 92% (Vibrio) and 98% (Proteus) to E. coli Lrp, including complete conservation of the helix-turn-helix motifs. The N-terminal region contains many of the sequence differences among these Lrp orthologs, which led us to investigate its role in Lrp function. Through the generation of hybrid proteins, we found that the N-terminal diversity is responsible for some of the differences between orthologs in terms of DNA binding (as revealed by mobility shift assays) and multimerization (as revealed by gel filtration, dynamic light scattering, and analytical ultracentrifugation). These observations indicate that the N-terminal tail plays a significant role in modulating Lrp function, similar to what is seen for a number of other regulatory proteins.

Reconstruction of Escherichia coli transcriptional regulatory networks via regulon-based associations

Background

Network reconstruction methods that rely on covariance of expression of transcription regulators and their targets ignore the fact that transcription of regulators and their targets can be controlled differently and/or independently. Such oversight would result in many erroneous predictions. However, accurate prediction of gene regulatory interactions can be made possible through modeling and estimation of transcriptional activity of groups of co-regulated genes.

Results

Incomplete regulatory connectivity and expression data are used here to construct a consensus network of transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli (E. coli). The network is updated via a covariance model describing the activity of gene sets controlled by common regulators. The proposed model-selection algorithm was used to annotate the likeliest regulatory interactions in E. coli on the basis of two independent sets of expression data, each containing many microarray experiments under a variety of conditions. The key regulatory predictions have been verified by an experiment and literature survey. In addition, the estimated activity profiles of transcription factors were used to describe their responses to environmental and genetic perturbations as well as drug treatments.

Conclusion

Information about transcriptional activity of documented co-regulated genes (a core regulon) should be sufficient for discovering new target genes, whose transcriptional activities significantly co-vary with the activity of the core regulon members. Our ability to derive a highly significant consensus network by applying the regulon-based approach to two very different data sets demonstrated the efficiency of this strategy. We believe that this approach can be used to reconstruct gene regulatory networks of other organisms for which partial sets of known interactions are available.

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) acts as a virulence repressor in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a global gene regulator that influences expression of a large number of genes including virulence-related genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. No systematic studies examining the regulation of virulence genes by Lrp have been reported in Salmonella. We report here that constitutive expression of Lrp [lrp(Con)] dramatically attenuates Salmonella virulence while an lrp deletion (Deltalrp) mutation enhances virulence. The lrp(Con) mutant caused pleiotropic effects that include defects in invasion, cytotoxicity, and colonization, whereas the Deltalrp mutant was more proficient at these activities than the wild-type strain. We present evidence that Lrp represses transcription of key virulence regulator genes--hilA, invF, and ssrA--in Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) and 2 (SPI-2), by binding directly to their promoter regions, P(hilA), P(invF), and P(ssrA). In addition, Western blot analysis showed that the expression of the SPI-1 effector SipA was reduced in the lrp(Con) mutant and enhanced in the Deltalrp mutant. Computational analysis revealed putative Lrp-binding consensus DNA motifs located in P(hilA), P(invF), and P(ssrA). These results suggest that Lrp binds to the consensus motifs and modulates expression of the linked genes. The presence of leucine enhanced Lrp binding to P(invF) in vitro and the addition of leucine to growth medium decreased the level of invF transcription. However, leucine had no effect on expression of hilA and ssrA or on cellular levels of Lrp. In addition, Lrp appears to be an antivirulence gene, since the deletion mutant showed enhanced cell invasion, cytotoxicity, and hypervirulence in BALB/c mice.

Postgenomic adventures with Rhodobacter sphaeroides

This review describes some of the recent highlights taken from the studies of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1. The review is not intended to be comprehensive, but to reflect the bias of the authors as to how the availability of a sequenced and annotated genome, a gene-chip, and proteomic profile as well as comparative genomic analyses can direct the progress of future research in this system.

The role of high affinity non-specific DNA binding by Lrp in transcriptional regulation and DNA organization

Transcriptional regulatory proteins typically bind specific DNA sequences with approximately 10(3)-10(7)-fold higher affinity than non-specific DNA and this discrimination is essential for their in vivo function. Here we show that the bacterial leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) does not follow this trend and has a approximately 20-400-fold binding discrimination between specific and non-specific DNA sequences. We suggest that the dual function of Lrp to regulate genes and to organize DNA utilizes this unique property. A approximately 20-fold decrease in binding affinity from specific DNA is dependent upon cryptic binding sites, including the sequence GN(2-3)TTT and A-tracts. Removal of these sites still results in high binding affinity, only approximately 70-fold weaker than that of specific sites. Similar to Lrp's binding of specific sites in the pap and ilvIH promoters, Lrp binds cooperatively to non-specific DNA; thus, protein/protein interactions are important for both specific and non-specific DNA binding. When considering this cooperativity of Lrp binding, the binding selectivity to specific sites may increase to a maximum of approximately 400-fold. Neither leucine nor the pap-specific local regulator PapI alter Lrp's non-specific binding affinity or cooperative binding of non-specific DNA. We hypothesize that Lrp combines low sequence discrimination and relatively high intracellular protein concentrations to ensure its ability to regulate the transcription of specific genes while also functioning as a nucleoid-associated protein. Modeling of Lrp binding data and comparison to other proteins with regulatory and nucleoid-associated properties suggests similar mechanisms.

Structure of the Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein Lrp reveals a novel octameric assembly

The structure of Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) co-crystallized with a short duplex oligodeoxynucleotide reveals a novel quaternary assembly in which the protein octamer forms an open, linear array of four dimers. In contrast, structures of the Lrp homologs LrpA, LrpC and AsnC crystallized in the absence of DNA show that these proteins instead form highly symmetrical octamers in which the four dimers form a closed ring. Although the DNA is disordered within the Lrp crystal, comparative analyses suggest that the observed differences in quaternary state may arise from DNA interactions during crystallization. Interconversion of these conformations, possibly in response to DNA or leucine binding, provides an underlying mechanism to alter the relative spatial orientation of the DNA-binding domains. Breaking of the closed octamer symmetry may be a common essential step in the formation of active DNA complexes by all members of the Lrp/AsnC family of transcriptional regulatory proteins.

Identification of the Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae leucine-responsive regulatory protein and its involvement in the regulation of in vivo-induced genes

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is a gram-negative bacterial pathogen that causes a severe hemorrhagic pneumonia in swine. We have previously shown that the limitation of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) is a cue that induces the expression of a subset of A. pleuropneumoniae genes identified as specifically induced during infection of the natural host animal by using an in vivo expression technology screen. Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a global regulator and has been shown in Escherichia coli to regulate many genes, including genes involved in BCAA biosynthesis. We hypothesized that A. pleuropneumoniae contains a regulator similar to Lrp and that this protein is involved in the regulation of a subset of genes important during infection and recently shown to have increased expression in the absence of BCAAs. We report the identification of an A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 gene encoding a protein with similarity to amino acid sequence and functional domains of other reported Lrp proteins. We further show that purified A. pleuropneumoniae His6-Lrp binds in vitro to the A. pleuropneumoniae promoter regions for ilvI, antisense cps1AB, lrp, and nqr. A genetically defined A. pleuropneumoniae lrp mutant was constructed using an allelic replacement and sucrose counterselection method. Analysis of expression from the ilvI and antisense cps1AB promoters in wild-type, lrp mutant, and complemented lrp mutant strains indicated that Lrp is required for induction of expression of ilvI under BCAA limitation.

Epigenetic gene regulation in the bacterial world

Like many eukaryotes, bacteria make widespread use of postreplicative DNA methylation for the epigenetic control of DNA-protein interactions. Unlike eukaryotes, however, bacteria use DNA adenine methylation (rather than DNA cytosine methylation) as an epigenetic signal. DNA adenine methylation plays roles in the virulence of diverse pathogens of humans and livestock animals, including pathogenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Vibrio, Yersinia, Haemophilus, and Brucella. In Alphaproteobacteria, methylation of adenine at GANTC sites by the CcrM methylase regulates the cell cycle and couples gene transcription to DNA replication. In Gammaproteobacteria, adenine methylation at GATC sites by the Dam methylase provides signals for DNA replication, chromosome segregation, mismatch repair, packaging of bacteriophage genomes, transposase activity, and regulation of gene expression. Transcriptional repression by Dam methylation appears to be more common than transcriptional activation. Certain promoters are active only during the hemimethylation interval that follows DNA replication; repression is restored when the newly synthesized DNA strand is methylated. In the E. coli genome, however, methylation of specific GATC sites can be blocked by cognate DNA binding proteins. Blockage of GATC methylation beyond cell division permits transmission of DNA methylation patterns to daughter cells and can give rise to distinct epigenetic states, each propagated by a positive feedback loop. Switching between alternative DNA methylation patterns can split clonal bacterial populations into epigenetic lineages in a manner reminiscent of eukaryotic cell differentiation. Inheritance of self-propagating DNA methylation patterns governs phase variation in the E. coli pap operon, the agn43 gene, and other loci encoding virulence-related cell surface functions.

Structural insight into gene transcriptional regulation and effector binding by the Lrp/AsnC family

The Lrp/AsnC family of transcriptional regulatory proteins is found in both archaea and bacteria. Members of the family influence cellular metabolism in both a global (Lrp) and specific (AsnC) manner, often in response to exogenous amino acid effectors. In the present study we have determined both the first bacterial and the highest resolution structures for members of the family. Escherichia coli AsnC is a specific gene regulator whose activity is triggered by asparagine binding. Bacillus subtilis LrpC is a global regulator involved in chromosome condensation. Our AsnC-asparagine structure is the first for a regulator-effector complex and is revealed as an octameric disc. Key ligand recognition residues are identified together with a route for ligand access. The LrpC structure reveals a stable octamer supportive of a topological role in dynamic DNA packaging. The structures yield significant clues to the functionality of Lrp/AsnC-type regulators with respect to ligand binding and oligomerization states as well as to their role in specific and global DNA regulation.

Role of LrpC from Bacillus subtilis in DNA transactions during DNA repair and recombination

Bacillus subtilis LrpC is a sequence-independent DNA-binding and DNA-bending protein, which binds both single-stranded (ss) and double-stranded (ds) DNA and facilitates the formation of higher order protein–DNA complexes in vitro. LrpC binds at different sites within the same DNA molecule promoting intramolecular ligation. When bound to separate molecules, it promotes intermolecular ligation, and joint molecule formation between a circular ssDNA and a homologous ssDNA-tailed linear dsDNA. LrpC binding showed a higher affinity for 4-way (Holliday) junctions in their open conformation, when compared with curved dsDNA. Consistent with these biochemical activities, an lrpC null mutant strain rendered cells sensitive to DNA damaging agents such as methyl methanesulfonate and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide, and showed a segregation defect. These findings collectively suggest that LrpC may be involved in DNA transactions during DNA repair and recombination.

Photometric assay for measuring the intracellular concentration of branched-chain amino acids in bacteria

The changes in intracellular pool of branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) regulate different physiological processes in bacteria. Up to date, the only available photometric test for measuring BCAA concentration was adapted for blood and plasma samples in diagnostic purposes. We have modified this method for use on bacterial cells, and tested its applicability on several model organisms: Lactococcus lactis, Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli.

Biphasic excitation by leucine in Escherichia coli chemotaxis

Leucine concentration jumps (applied by photolysis of inert derivatives) triggered swim or tumble responses in Escherichia coli mutants lacking Tsr or Tar, respectively. Wild-type E. coli bacteria were attracted in spatial assays when the initial leucine concentration difference was 5 to 120 micro M but were repulsed when it was over 0.5 mM. Their responses to concentration jumps confirmed earlier deductions regarding biphasic excitation.

The Lrp family of transcriptional regulators

Genome analysis has revealed that members of the Lrp family of transcriptional regulators are widely distributed among prokaryotes, both bacteria and archaea. The archetype Leucine-responsive Regulatory Protein from Escherichia coli is a global regulator involved in modulating a variety of metabolic functions, including the catabolism and anabolism of amino acids as well as pili synthesis. Most Lrp homologues, however, appear to act as specific regulators of amino acid metabolism-related genes. Like most prokaryotic transcriptional regulators, Lrp-like regulators consist of a DNA-binding domain and a ligand-binding domain. The crystal structure of the Pyrococcus furiosus LrpA revealed an N-terminal domain with a common helix-turn-helix fold, and a C-terminal domain with a typical alphabeta-sandwich fold. The latter regulatory domain constitutes a novel ligand-binding site and has been designated RAM. Database analysis reveals that the RAM domain is present in many prokaryotic genomes, potentially encoding (1) Lrp-homologues, when fused to a DNA-binding domain (2) enzymes, when fused as a potential regulatory domain to a catalytic domain, and (3) stand-alone RAM modules with unknown function. The architecture of Lrp regulators with two distinct domains that harbour the regulatory (effector-binding) site and the active (DNA-binding) site, and their separation by a flexible hinge region, suggests a general allosteric switch of Lrp-like regulators.

High resolution contact probing of the Lrp-like DNA-binding protein Ss-Lrp from the hyperthermoacidophilic crenarchaeote Sulfolobus solfataricus P2

Ss-Lrp, from Sulfolobus solfataricus, is an archaeal homologue of the global bacterial regulator Lrp (Leucine-responsive regulatory protein), which out of all genome-encoded proteins is most similar to Escherichia coli Lrp (E-value of 5.6 e-14). The recombinant protein has been purified as a 68 kDa homotetramer. The specific binding of Ss-Lrp to its own control region is suggestive of negative autoregulation. A high resolution contact map of Ss-Lrp binding was established by DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting, small non-intercalating groove-specific ligand-binding interference, and various base-specific premodification and base removal binding interference techniques. We show that Ss-Lrp binds one face of the DNA helix and establishes the most salient contacts with two major groove segments and the intervening minor groove, in a region that overlaps the TATA-box and BRE promoter elements. Therefore, Ss-Lrp most likely exerts autoregulation by preventing promoter recognition by TBP and TFB. Moreover, the results demonstrate profound Ss-Lrp induced structural alterations of sequence stretches flanking the core contact site, and reveal that the deformability of these regions significantly contributes to binding selectivity.

Conjugal transfer of the virulence plasmid of Salmonella enterica is regulated by the leucine-responsive regulatory protein and DNA adenine methylation

Host-encoded functions that regulate the transfer operon (tra) in the virulence plasmid of Salmonella enterica (pSLT) were identified with a genetic screen. Mutations that decreased tra operon expression mapped in the lrp gene, which encodes the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). Reduced tra operon expression in an Lrp- background is caused by lowered transcription of the traJ gene, which encodes a transcriptional activator of the tra operon. Gel retardation assays indicated that Lrp binds a DNA region upstream of the traJ promoter. Deletion of the Lrp binding site resulted in lowered and Lrp-independent traJ transcription. Conjugal transfer of pSLT decreased 50-fold in a Lrp- background. When a FinO- derivative of pSLT was used, conjugal transfer from an Lrp- donor decreased 1000-fold. Mutations that derepressed tra operon expression mapped in dam, the gene encoding Dam methyltransferase. Expression of the tra operon and conjugal transfer remain repressed in an Lrp- Dam- background. These observations support the model that Lrp acts as a conjugation activator by promoting traJ transcription, whereas Dam methylation acts as a conjugation repressor by activating FinP RNA synthesis. This dual control of conjugal transfer may also operate in other F-like plasmids such as F and R100.

Structure of the Lrp-regulated serA promoter of Escherichia coli K-12

Expression of the Escherichia coli serA gene is activated in vivo by the product of the lrp gene, leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), an effect partially reversed by L-leucine. We show here that serA is transcribed from two promoters, P1 45 bp upstream of the translation start site, and P2 92 bp further upstream. Lrp binds to a long AT-rich sequence from -158 to -82 from the start of the coding region, i.e. upstream of P1 and overlapping P2. It activates transcription from P1 and represses expression from P2. A second regulator, cAMP/CRP, activates P2, an effect that is largely inhibited by Lrp, such that catabolite repressor protein (Crp) and Lrp are rival activators of serA transcription.

Modulation of Lrp action in Escherichia coli by leucine: effects on non-specific binding of Lrp to DNA

Lrp is a global regulator of metabolism in Escherichia coli that helps cells respond to changes in environmental conditions. The action of Lrp as a transcriptional activator or repressor is sometimes affected by whether the medium contains exogenous leucine. The abundance of Lrp in cells is relatively high (about 15 microM in monomer), and given the relatively high Lrp binding affinity in vitro for specific binding sites (nanomolar apparent dissociation constants), the expectation is that all binding sites will be saturated with Lrp in vivo. Here we consider the fraction of the total Lrp in cells that is free and the fraction that is bound to DNA. Using minicell-producing strains, we measured the distribution of Lrp between cytoplasm and nucleoid in cells grown under different nutritional conditions and in cells in different phases of growth. In E. coli cells grown in minimal medium to mid-log phase, the ratio of free to DNA-bound Lrp was about 0.67. This ratio decreased about threefold when the cells were grown in minimal medium supplemented with leucine. Our results also confirmed the previous finding that growth rate regulates lrp expression by as much as three to fourfold. Growth rate-regulated lrp expression, along with changes in the extent of non-specific binding, influences the level of free Lrp in vivo over a 16-fold range. We propose that the net effect of these processes is to regulate the relative concentrations of free Lrp hexadecamer and leucine-bound octamer, leading to promoter selection in response to environmental conditions.

Leucine-regulated self-association of leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) from Escherichia coli

Lrp is a global regulatory protein in Escherichia coli that activates expression of more than a dozen operons and represses expression of another dozen. For some operons, exogenous leucine reduces the extent of Lrp action, for others it potentiates the effect of Lrp, and for yet other operons it has no effect. In an effort to understand how leucine affects Lrp-mediated expression, we examined Lrp self-association and the effect of leucine on self-association using light scattering, chemical cross-linking, and analytical ultracentrifugation. The following results were obtained. (i) Lrp self-associates to a hexadecamer and octamer with the predominant species being hexadecamer at microM concentrations. (ii) Lrp undergoes a leucine-induced dissociation of hexadecamer to octamer. (iii) A mutant Lrp lacking 11 amino acid residues at the C terminus does not form higher-order oligomers, suggesting that the C terminus is involved in subunit association. (iv) At nM concentrations, Lrp dissociates to a dimer. It is proposed that leucine regulates the equilibrium between Lrp oligomers and thus Lrp occupancy of sites within different operons, leading to diverse regulatory patterns.

Global versus local regulatory roles for Lrp-related proteins: Haemophilus influenzae as a case study

Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein) plays a global regulatory role in Escherichia coli, affecting expression of dozens of operons. Numerous lrp-related genes have been identified in different bacteria and archaea, including asnC, an E. coli gene that was the first reported member of this family. Pairwise comparisons of amino acid sequences of the corresponding proteins shows an average sequence identity of only 29% for the vast majority of comparisons. By contrast, Lrp-related proteins from enteric bacteria show more than 97% amino acid identity. Is the global regulatory role associated with E. coli Lrp limited to enteric bacteria? To probe this question we investigated LrfB, an Lrp-related protein from Haemophilus influenzae that shares 75% sequence identity with E. coli Lrp (highest sequence identity among 42 sequences compared). A strain of H. influenzae having an lrfB null allele grew at the wild-type growth rate but with a filamentous morphology. A comparison of two-dimensional (2D) electrophoretic patterns of proteins from parent and mutant strains showed only two differences (comparable studies with lrp(+) and lrp E. coli strains by others showed 20 differences). The abundance of LrfB in H. influenzae, estimated by Western blotting experiments, was about 130 dimers per cell (compared to 3,000 dimers per E. coli cell). LrfB expressed in E. coli replaced Lrp as a repressor of the lrp gene but acted only to a limited extent as an activator of the ilvIH operon. Thus, although LrfB resembles Lrp sufficiently to perform some of its functions, its low abundance is consonant with a more local role in regulating but a few genes, a view consistent with the results of the 2D electrophoretic analysis. We speculate that an Lrp having a global regulatory role evolved to help enteric bacteria adapt to their ecological niches and that it is unlikely that Lrp-related proteins in other organisms have a broad regulatory function.

Bacillus subtilis LrpC is a sequence-independent DNA-binding and DNA-bending protein which bridges DNA

Genetic evidence suggests that the Bacillus subtilis lrpC gene product participates in cell growth and sporulation. The purified LrpC protein, which has a predicted molecular mass of 16.4 kDa, is a tetramer in solution. LrpC binds with higher affinity ( K (app) approximately 80 nM) to intrinsically curved DNA than to non-curved DNA ( K (app) approximately 700 nM). DNase I footprinting and the supercoiling of relaxed circular plasmid DNA in the presence of topoisomerase I revealed that LrpC induces DNA bending and constrains DNA supercoils in vitro. The LrpC protein cooperatively increases DNA binding of the bona fide DNA-binding and DNA-bending protein Hbsu. LrpC forms inter- and intramolecular bridges on linear and supercoiled DNA molecules, resulting in a large network and DNA compactation. Collectively, these findings suggest that LrpC is an architectural protein and that its activities could provide a means to modulate DNA transactions.

Twelve species of the nucleoid-associated protein from Escherichia coli. Sequence recognition specificity and DNA binding affinity

The genome of Escherichia coli is composed of a single molecule of circular DNA with the length of about 47,000 kilobase pairs, which is associated with about 10 major DNA-binding proteins, altogether forming the nucleoid. We expressed and purified 12 species of the DNA-binding protein, i.e. CbpA (curved DNA-binding protein A), CbpB or Rob (curved DNA-binding protein B or right arm of the replication origin binding protein), DnaA (DNA-binding protein A), Dps (DNA-binding protein from starved cells), Fis (factor for inversion stimulation), Hfq (host factor for phage Q(beta)), H-NS (histone-like nucleoid structuring protein), HU (heat-unstable nucleoid protein), IciA (inhibitor of chromosome initiation A), IHF (integration host factor), Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein), and StpA (suppressor of td(-) phenotype A). The sequence specificity of DNA binding was determined for all the purified nucleoid proteins using gel-mobility shift assays. Five proteins (CbpB, DnaA, Fis, IHF, and Lrp) were found to bind to specific DNA sequences, while the remaining seven proteins (CbpA, Dps, Hfq, H-NS, HU, IciA, and StpA) showed apparently sequence-nonspecific DNA binding activities. Four proteins, CbpA, Hfq, H-NS, and IciA, showed the binding preference for the curved DNA. From the apparent dissociation constant (K(d)) determined using the sequence-specific or nonspecific DNA probes, the order of DNA binding affinity were determined to be: HU > IHF > Lrp > CbpB(Rob) > Fis > H-NS > StpA > CbpA > IciA > Hfq/Dps, ranging from 25 nM (HU binding to the non-curved DNA) to 250 nM (Hfq binding to the non-curved DNA), under the assay conditions employed.

Escherichia coli Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein) does not directly regulate expression of the leu operon promoter

Studies by R. Lin et al. (J. Bacteriol. 174:1948-1955, 1992) suggested that the Escherichia coli leu operon might be a member of the Lrp regulon. Their results were obtained with a leucine auxotroph; in leucine prototrophs grown in a medium lacking leucine, there was little difference in leu operon expression between lrp(+) and lrp strains. Furthermore, when leuP-lacZ transcriptional fusions that lacked the leu attenuator were used, expression from the leu promoter varied less than twofold between lrp(+) and lrp strains, irrespective of whether or not excess leucine was added to the medium. The simplest explanation of the observations of Lin et al. is that the known elevated leucine transport capacity of lrp strains (S. A. Haney et al., J. Bacteriol. 174:108-115, 1992) leads to very high intracellular levels of leucine for strains grown with leucine, resulting in the superattenuation of leu operon expression.

An Lrp-type transcriptional regulator from Agrobacterium tumefaciens condenses more than 100 nucleotides of DNA into globular nucleoprotein complexes

The PutR protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens positively regulates expression of the putA gene in response to exogenous proline, resulting in the utilization of proline as a source of carbon and nitrogen. PutR activity required a region of DNA extending more than 106 nt upstream of the putA transcription start site. Purified PutR bound to this region with high degree of affinity and repressed expression of the putR promoter in vitro. PutR also activated the putA promoter in vitro in the presence of proline, though less strongly than in whole cells. PutR protected a DNA interval extending from nucleotides -30 to -140, but protected only one helical face over most of this interval, suggesting that it may bind only to this face of the DNA. The addition of proline caused a slight decrease in binding affinity and altered DNase I protection patterns along the entire length of the binding site. PutR-DNA complexes were found by atomic force microscopy to be globular rather than elongated. Although the DNA fragment in these complexes was 190 nm in length, the length of the visible DNA was only 150 nm, indicating that 40 nm of DNA (115 nt) must be condensed with protein. PutR caused a net bend of this binding site, and under some conditions, proline shifted the center of this bend by one helical turn.

Comparison of the sensitivities of two Escherichia coli genes to in vivo variation of Lrp concentration

Transcription of the Escherichia coli genes serA and gltBDF depends on the leucine-responsive regulatory protein, Lrp, and is very much decreased in an lrp mutant. By the use of an Lrp-deficient host and the lrp gene cloned under a plasmid-borne arabinose pBAD promoter, we varied the amount of Lrp present in the cell and showed that both genes were transcribed in proportion to the amount of Lrp synthesized. The affinity of serA for Lrp was four to five times greater than the affinity of gltD. Overproduction of Lrp was lethal to the cell.

Cloning and identification of the Sulfolobus solfataricus lrp gene encoding an archaeal homologue of the eubacterial leucine-responsive global transcriptional regulator Lrp

The lrp gene of the extreme thermophilic archaeon Sulfolofus solfataricus, encoding a homologue of the eubacterial global leucine-responsive regulatory protein, was identified by DNA sequencing and sequence comparisons on a 6.9-kb genomic fragment cloned into Escherichia coli. The S. solfataricus Lrp subunit is a 155-aa polypeptide that bears between 24.5 and 29% sequence identity with eubacterial regulatory proteins of the Lrp/AsnC family and 30.6% and 25.8% with the archaeal homologues of respectively Methanococcus jannaschii and Pyrococcus furiosus. Transcription initiation from the strong S. solfataricus lrp promoter was analyzed by primer extension mapping. The abundance of the S. solfataricus lrp messenger strongly suggests that this protein might function in archaea as a global transcriptional regulator and genome organizer, as proposed for E. coli Lrp, rather than as a local, specific regulatory protein. Our findings suggest the presence of a eubacterial type of regulatory mechanism in archaea, a situation that is noteworthy indeed, since the transcriptional machinery of archaea is more closely related to that of eukaryotes, whereas these latter apparently do not possess a homologue of Lrp.

Clues and consequences of DNA bending in transcription

This review attempts to substantiate the notion that nonlinear DNA structures allow prokaryotic cells to evolve complex signal integration devices that, to some extent, parallel the transduction cascades employed by higher organisms to control cell growth and differentiation. Regulatory cascades allow the possibility of inserting additional checks, either positive or negative, in every step of the process. In this context, the major consequence of DNA bending in transcription is that promoter geometry becomes a key regulatory element. By using DNA bending, bacteria afford multiple metabolic control levels simply through alteration of promoter architecture, so that positive signals favor an optimal constellation of protein-protein and protein-DNA contacts required for activation. Additional effects of regulated DNA bending in prokaryotic promoters include the amplification and translation of small physiological signals into major transcriptional responses and the control of promoter specificity for cognate regulators.

A nucleoprotein activation complex between the leucine-responsive regulatory protein and DNA upstream of the gltBDF operon in Escherichia coli

The global regulator Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein), in some cases modulated by its co-regulator leucine, has been shown to regulate more than 40 genes and operons in Escherichia coli. Leucine modulates Lrp regulation of leucine-responsive operons. The level of sensitivity of these operons to leucine varies greatly, but the basis for this variation is only partially understood. One operon controlled by Lrp that is relatively insensitive to leucine is gltBDF, which includes genes specifying the large (GltB) and small (GltD) subunits of glutamate synthase. Earlier gel mobility shift assays have demonstrated that Lrp binds to a fragment of DNA containing the gltBDF promoter region. To further define the nature of this Lrp-gltBDF interaction, DNase I footprinting experiments were performed. The results indicate that Lrp binds cooperatively to three sites quite far upstream, spanning the region from -140 to -260 base-pairs relative to the start of transcription. Phased hypersensitivity is observed throughout the entire binding region, suggesting that Lrp bends the DNA. To determine the relative importance of these three sites for the transcriptional activation of gltBDF, a series of site-directed mutations was generated. The effects of these mutations on Lrp binding were determined both by DNase I footprinting and by quantitative mobility shift assays, while their effects on transcription in vivo were examined by measuring beta-galactosidase activity levels of chromosomal gltB::lacZ operon fusions. Our results indicate that all three sites are required for maximal gene expression, as is the proper phasing of the sites with one another and with the start of transcription. Our results suggest that Lrp binds a central palindromic site, interacting predominantly with the major groove of its DNA target, and that additional dimers bind to flanking sites to form a nucleoprotein activation complex.

Metabolic regulation of lrp gene expression in Escherichia coli K-12

Expression of the lrp gene is regulated in part by the nutrients available to the cell, and is decreased in rich medium, in glucose minimal media enriched with amino acids, and in minimal medium with alternative carbon sources, such as acetate and succinate. When Lrp production is increased in a given medium, expression of its target genes is also increased. However, when the medium is changed from glucose to acetate, the response of the target genes is governed by many factors.

Use of an in vivo titration method to study a global regulator: effect of varying Lrp levels on expression of gltBDF in Escherichia coli

Most studies of global regulatory proteins are performed in vitro or involve phenotypic comparisons between wild-type and mutant strains. We report the use of strains in which the gene for the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (lrp) is transcribed from isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible promoters for the purpose of continuously varying the in vivo concentration of Lrp. To obtain a broad range of Lrp concentrations, strains were employed that contained the lrp fusion either in the chromosome (I. C. Blomfield, P. J. Calie, K. J. Eberhardt, M. S. McClain, and B. I. Eisenstein, J. Bacteriol. 175:27-36, 1993) or on a multicopy plasmid. Western blot (immunoblot) analysis with polyclonal antiserum to Lrp confirmed that Lrp levels could be varied more than 70-fold by growing the strains in glucose minimal 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) medium containing different amounts of IPTG. Expression of an Lrp-regulated gltB::lacZ operon fusion was measured over this range of Lrp concentrations. beta-Galactosidase activity rose with increasing Lrp levels up to the level of Lrp found in wild-type strains, at which point expression is maximal. The presence of leucine in the medium increased the level of Lrp necessary to achieve half-maximal expression of the gltB::lacZ fusion, as predicted by earlier in vitro studies (B. R. Ernsting, J. W. Denninger, R. M. Blumenthal, and R. G. Matthews, J. Bacteriol. 175:7160-7169, 1993). Interestingly, levels of Lrp greater than those in wild-type cells interfered with activation of gltB::lacZ expression. The growth rate of cultures correlated with the intracellular Lrp concentration: levels of Lrp either lower or higher than wild-type levels resulted in significantly slower growth rates. Thus, the level of Lrp in the cell appears to be optimal for rapid growth in minimal medium, and the gltBDF control region is designed to give maximal expression at this Lrp level.

Discovery and molecular characterization of a plasmid localized in Buchnera sp. bacterial endosymbiont of the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi

We have identified and completely sequenced a novel plasmid isolated from the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. Evidence which suggests that the plasmid occurs localized within the bacterial endosymbionts is presented. The plasmid contains the four genes that constitute the entire leucine operon. This fact makes it really unique since most plasmids are dispensable and lack genes that encode essential anabolic functions. Four more phloem-feeding aphid species also seem to contain homologous plasmids. Although further work is necessary, we hypothesize that this plasmid has appeared during the evolution of the symbiotic association between the aphid and the bacterial endosymbiont. The fact that this plasmid contains the entire leucine operon can be related to physiological evidence showing that the aphid host's diet of plant phloem is deficient in essential amino acids.

Identification of Lrp-regulated genes by inverse PCR and sequencing: regulation of two mal operons of Escherichia coli by leucine-responsive regulatory protein

We have used the technique of inverse PCR to identify Escherichia coli chromosomal genes carrying Lrp-regulated inserts. This technique revealed that malT, malEFG, and malB-lamB-malK are all activated two- to fivefold by Lrp and confirmed that Lrp regulates expression of the leuDBCA and livHJKG operons. lacZ transcription is also increased in the presence of Lrp. However, the growth rate of the Lrp mutant on maltose and lactose is not decreased by Lrp deficiency.

The arginine repressor of Escherichia coli

This review tells the story of the arginine repressor of Escherichia coli from the time of its discovery in the 1950s until the present. It describes how the research progressed through physiological, genetic, and biochemical phases and how the nature of the repressor and its interaction with its target sites were unraveled. The studies of the repression of arginine biosynthesis revealed unique features at every level of the investigations. In the early phase of the work they showed that the genes controlled by the arginine repressor were scattered over the linkage map and were not united, as in other cases, in a single operon. This led to the concept of the regulon as a physiological unit of regulation. It was also shown that different alleles of the arginine repressor could result in either inhibition of enzyme formation, as in E. coli K-12, or in stimulation of enzyme formation, as in E. coli B. Later it was shown that the arginine repressor is a hexamer, whereas other repressors of biosynthetic pathways are dimers. As a consequence the arginine repressor binds to two palindromic sites rather than to one. It was found that the arginine repressor not only acts in the repression of enzyme synthesis but also is required for the resolution of plasmid multimers to monomers, a completely unrelated function. Finally, the arginine repressor does not possess characteristic structural features seen in other prokaryotic repressors, such as a helix-turn-helix motif or an antiparallel beta-sheet motif. The unique features have sustained continuous interest in the arginine repressor and have made it a challenging subject of investigation.

In vivo footprinting analysis of Lrp binding to the ilvIH promoter region of Escherichia coli

An in vivo footprinting analysis of the ilvIH regulatory region of Escherichia coli showed that the transcription activator Lrp binds to six sites, scattered over 250 bp upstream of the transcriptional start point. When Lrp-mediated activation was impaired by the presence of exogenous leucine, only one promoter-distal site (site 2) was partially protected by Lrp binding. Equilibrium dialysis experiments showed the formation of an Lrp-leucine complex in vitro. These results suggest that leucine negatively affects ilvIH transcription because its interaction with Lrp reduces the efficiency of binding of the regulatory protein to the promoter region.

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein, a global regulator of metabolism in Escherichia coli

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) regulates the expression of more than 40 genes and proteins in Escherichia coli. Among the operons that are positively regulated by Lrp are operons involved in amino acid biosynthesis (ilvIH, serA)), in the biosynthesis of pili (pap, fan, fim), and in the assimilation of ammonia (glnA, gltBD). Negatively regulated operons include operons involved in amino acid catabolism (sdaA, tdh) and peptide transport (opp) and the operon coding for Lrp itself (lrp). Detailed studies of a few members of the regulon have shown that Lrp can act directly to activate or repress transcription of target operons. A substantial fraction of operons regulated by Lrp are also regulated by leucine, and the effect of leucine on expression of these operons requires a functional Lrp protein. The patterns of regulation are surprising and interesting: in some cases activation or repression mediated by Lrp is antagonized by leucine, in other cases Lrp-mediated activation or repression is potentiated by leucine, and in still other cases leucine has no effect on Lrp-mediated regulation. Current research is just beginning to elucidate the detailed mechanisms by which Lrp can mediate such a broad spectrum of regulatory effects. Our view of the role of Lrp in metabolism may change as more members of the regulon are identified and their regulation characterized, but at this point Lrp seems to be important in regulating nitrogen metabolism and one-carbon metabolism, permitting adaptations to feast and to famine.

Promoters responsive to DNA bending: a common theme in prokaryotic gene expression

The early notion of DNA as a passive target for regulatory proteins has given way to the realization that higher-order DNA structures and DNA-protein complexes are at the basis of many molecular processes, including control of promoter activity. Protein binding may direct the bending of an otherwise linear DNA, exacerbate the angle of an intrinsic bend, or assist the directional flexibility of certain sequences within prokaryotic promoters. The important, sometimes essential role of intrinsic or protein-induced DNA bending in transcriptional regulation has become evident in virtually every system examined. As discussed throughout this article, not every function of DNA bends is understood, but their presence has been detected in a wide variety of bacterial promoters subjected to positive or negative control. Nonlinear DNA structures facilitate and even determine proximal and distal DNA-protein and protein-protein contacts involved in the various steps leading to transcription initiation.

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein and deoxyadenosine methylase control the phase variation and expression of the sfa and daa pili operons in Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli operons daa and sfa encode F1845 and S pili, respectively. In this paper we show that the expression of these operons is under phase variation control at a transcriptional level. The transcription of both operons is dependent on the global regulator leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) and deoxyadenosine methylase (Dam). Lrp is required for methylation protection of two GATC sites located within conserved DNA sequences in the regulatory regions of these operons. These GATC sites are differentially methylated, establishing a methylation pattern which is characteristic of either the phase ON or phase OFF state. We also show that Lrp binds to the daa and sfa regulatory regions and that this binding is modulated by the methylation of the GATC sites. These results indicate that the phase variation of the daa and sfa operons is regulated by a mechanism involving differential binding of Lrp owing to methylation of GATC sites in the regulatory region, which is similar to the mechanism that controls phase variation of the pap operon.

Complex transcriptional control of the sigma s-dependent stationary-phase-induced and osmotically regulated osmY (csi-5) gene suggests novel roles for Lrp, cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein-cAMP complex, and integration host factor in the stationary-phase response of Escherichia coli

osmY (csi-5) is a representative of a large group of sigma s-dependent genes in Escherichia coli that exhibit both stationary-phase induction and osmotic regulation. A chromosomal transcriptional lacZ fusion (csi-5::lacZ) was used to study the regulation of osmY. We show here that in addition to sigma s, the global regulators Lrp, cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein-cAMP complex (cAMP-CRP), and integration host factor (IHF) are involved in the control of osmY. All three regulators negatively modulate the expression of osmY, and they act independently from sigma s. Stationary-phase induction of osmY in minimal medium can be explained by stimulation by sigma s combined with a relief of Lrp repression. Stationary-phase induction of osmY in rich medium is mediated by the combined action of sigma s, Lrp, cAMP-CRP, and IHF, with the latter three proteins acting as transition state regulators. The transcriptional start site of osmY was determined and revealed an mRNA with an unusual long nontranslated leader of 244 nucleotides. The regulatory region is characterized by a sigma 70-like -10 promoter region and contains potential binding sites for Lrp, CRP, and IHF. Whereas sigma s, Lrp, CRP, and IHF are clearly involved in stationary-phase induction, none of these regulators is essential for osmotic regulation of osmY.